A phase II trial of palliative docetaxel plus 5-fluorouracil for squamous-cell cancer of the head and neck

Response Rate of Cisplatin Plus Docetaxel as Primary Treatment in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma (Squamous Cell Types)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the response rate of Cisplatin plus Docetaxel in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It was a longitudinal study, conducted at the Department of Medical Oncology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center, Karachi, Pakistan from December 2018 to June 2019. One hundred patients of age 14-66 years of age of either gender with histologically proven Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, Stage III and IV (locally advanced) with no distant metastases were included in the study. Patients who were declared unresectable by the otolaryngologist and those with delayed appointment for radiation were given 3 cycles of Induction Chemotherapy with Cisplatin and Docetaxel, both at a dose of 75mg/m2 3 weekly. After 3 cycles, CT scan was repeated to assess the clinical response. Those patients who had partial or complete response as per RECIST criteria were re-assessed by the otolaryngologist and were planned for surgery if disease became resectable while other patients were referred for Concurrent Chemo-Radiation Therapy (CCRT). SPSS version 23 was used to analyze data.

RESULTS

The partial response was achieved in majority of the patients after Induction Chemotherapy with Docetaxel and Cisplatin (62%) with a complete response in 12 %. However, 22% showed progression of the disease, and 4% showed stable disease. The most frequent side effects observed were diarrhea (62%) and neutropenia (57%).

CONCLUSION

Induction chemotherapy with Cisplatin and Docetaxel is a promising regimen with good response and favorable toxicity profile and can be considered as a potentially effective outpatient regimen for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck.

A Review of the Literature of Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatments of Invasive Squamous Cells Carcinoma

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is an increasing public health problem. It is a primary malignant skin tumor with Malpighian differentiation and together with basal cell carcinoma is classified among nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs). cSCC usually occurs on photoexposed areas, such as the head, the neck, and the extremities, and its incidence increases with age. Invasive forms of this skin tumor tend to be more aggressive showing a higher metastatic potential, usually regarding regional lymph nodes. Treatment options for invasive cSCCs include both surgical and nonsurgical options. The therapeutic choice depends on several factors, such as anatomic location, risk factors for tumor recurrence, age, and health status of the patient. This review aims to provide an overview of the current evidence on therapeutic surgical and nonsurgical management of invasive cSCC.

Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Docetaxel Combination in Patients with Previously Treated Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Purpose. To explore the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine and docetaxel (GEMDOC) in previously treated patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients and Methods. Patients with advanced SCCHN previously pretreated with one or two lines of palliative chemotherapy were treated with gemcitabine and docetaxel until disease progression. Results. Thirty-six patients were enrolled, and 29 were response evaluable. 16 (55%) experienced clinical benefit (response or stable disease). Six (21%) patients achieved partial response (PR), none achieved complete response (CR), and the overall response rate (ORR) was 21% (95% CI: 0.10–0.38). Ten (28%) patients had stable disease. The median response duration (RD) for the 6 PR patients was 3.2 months (80% CI: 2.0–6.1 months). Median overall survival was 4.2 months (95% CI: 2.4–7.0 months). Among the 33 treated patients: 13 (39%) patients had grade 3-4 anemia, 10 (30%) had grade 3-4 neutropenia. Conclusion. The study drugs were relatively safe, and the clinical benefit (PR + SD) rate was 55%. However, the efficacy objective for this regimen was not met. Given the good safety profile, further investigation of this regimen with the addition of a targeted agent may lead to better efficacy.

Docetaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head And Neck

OBJECTIVES

This phase II study was conducted to assess the efficacy of docetaxel plus gemcitabine in locally recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty patients with pharynx or larynx cancer were included and treated with an intravenous infusion of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 8 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 day 1 and day 8 every 3 weeks for 6 cycles.

RESULTS

Among the 40 patients included, 17 had metastatic disease and 18 had received prior chemotherapy. Thirty-two patients were assessable for response. The overall response rate was 20.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.0%-35.7%), with 8 (20.0%) partial responses. Thirteen patients (32.5%) had stable disease, whereas 11 patients (27.5%) had progressive disease. The median response duration was 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.8-7.2). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed in 18 patients (45.0%). Three treatment-related deaths due to infection were reported.

CONCLUSION

The docetaxel and gemcitabine combination is an active treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer. However, this regimen is associated with a high hematologic toxicity. A new schedule of administration must be explored.

Chemotherapy options for patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

The purpose of this review is to provide readers with guidance concerning treatment of patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) in the context of clinical trial data. We discuss issues surrounding the treatment of patients with SCCHN, with an emphasis on recommendations based on results from phase II and III clinical trials published since 1980. Many options exist for the treatment of patients with SCCHN. The most important decisions involve determining which patients are in need of treatment and which are most likely to benefit from treatment. Although many chemotherapy treatments have been shown to induce responses, survival improvement remains an unfulfilled goal. Definitive data do not exist on the effects of chemotherapy on quality of life or progression-free survival as measures of clinical benefit in this setting. Performance status, history of prior treatment, extent of tumor, and need for palliation are the most important factors in the decision to treat a patient with chemotherapy for incurable SCCHN. Single-agent treatment with conventional doses of methotrexate remains a standard for most patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic SCCHN. Cisplatin plus fluorouracil, cisplatin plus a taxane, and single-agent taxane are the most widely studied alternatives. There is a need for further trials with end points other than overall survival or tumor response in this patient population. Guidelines for patient selection and treatment options are provided.

Taxanes in head and neck cancer

Paclitaxel and docetaxel are cytotoxic agents that act on the microtubule system and cause cell death. They are active in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region. They can be combined with other cytotoxic agents and radiotherapy with acceptable toxicity. This article reviews of both docetaxel and paclitaxel data in this patient population. Taxanes do not yet have a a license for use in the standard treatment of patients with head and neck cancer in Europe.

Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin/docetaxel versus cisplatin/5-fluorouracil for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A randomised phase II study

A combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF) is considered the standard induction chemotherapy regimen for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The present study compares the efficacy and safety of a new combination of cisplatin/docetaxel versus the PF regimen. A total of 83 chemotherapy-naive patients with locally advanced SCCHN were randomised to receive every 21 d (i) docetaxel 85 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 and cisplatin 40 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 2 (arm A) or (ii) cisplatin 100 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 followed by 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 in 24 h continuous infusion for 5 d (arm B). A total of 287 cycles (range 1-3 per patient) were administered. Among 76 patients evaluable for response, the overall response rate in arm A was 70% (complete response (CR) 26%, partial response (PR) 44%) and in arm B 69% (CR 16%, PR 54%), respectively. Median survival in arm A was 7.6 months (95% CI: 5.8-11.1) and 9.9 months (95% CI: 7.4-14.6) for arm B. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicity in arm A was neutropaenia (34.1%) and diarrhoea (9.8%) versus mucositis (29.3%) and neutropaenia (19.5%) in arm B. Both schedules present a similar efficacy, with different but acceptable toxicity patterns.

Enhancement of Ad-p53 Therapy with Docetaxel in Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this project was to determine the mechanisms in which docetaxel enhances Ad-p53 tumor suppressive effects in head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND

In advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), the 5-year survival rate is less than 40%. Because patients with advanced HNSCC have a high rate of local-regional failure (40-60%) with existing treatment modalities, aggressive local therapy approaches need to be developed. Previous data show that docetaxel or Ad-p53 alone have significant anti-tumor activity in HNSCC. Before testing whether a combination approach (Ad-p53 and docetaxel) could be developed in clinical trials, preclinical experiments were performed.

METHODS

The p53 gene was overexpressed in 2 head and neck squamous carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines, HN30 and HN12, and a murine Balb/c mucoepidermoid carcinoma (BMEC) cell line. Docetaxel's enhancement of adenoviral transduction (bGAL expression), coxsakie-adenovirus receptor (CAR) expression, and Ad-p53 induction of apoptosis (Annexin V expression) were measured. The modulation of regulators in the cell cycle, apoptosis and signal transduction pathways were measured using Western blot.

RESULTS

Docetaxel increased adenoviral transduction, which was dependent on the dose of docetaxel and levels of Ad-bGAL. The enhanced viral transduction was due in part to the upregulation of the CAR protein. Pretreatment with docetaxel enhanced Ad-p53-induced apoptosis through increased expression of exogenous p53. Together, the combination of docetaxel and Ad-p53 altered expression of key regulators in the cell cycle, apoptosis and signal transduction pathways with an increase in the expression of p53, bax, cleaved PARP, cleaved caspase-3 and phosphorylation of c-Jun at position at Ser. Cyclin A and B1 expression were down regulated by docetaxel and Ad-p53. When comparing the docetaxel-resistant to sensitive cell lines, the altered expression of p27 and skp1 by docetaxel and Ad-p53 were dissimilar between these cell lines.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel enhanced Ad-p53 transduction and increased expression of exogenous p53 gene transfer, apoptosis, and antitumor mechanisms. These results support a clinical combination of docetaxel with p53 gene therapy in patients with head and neck cancer.

Docetaxel Plus 5-Fluorouracil in Locally Recurrent and/or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

This phase II study evaluated docetaxel-5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in locally recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients were divided into 2 cohorts--those previously treated with chemotherapy and those nonpretreated--that received docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (day 1) plus 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2/day (days 1-5 every 3 weeks). Of 63 patients entered, 20 (31.7%) were pretreated and 43 (68.3%) were nonpretreated. Fifty-nine patients (93.7%) had received prior radiotherapy. After inclusion of 20 patients, the 5-FU dose was reduced to 750 mg/m2/day due to unacceptable toxicity. The overall response rate (ORR) was 20.6% on radiologic review (22.2%, investigator assessment). Pretreated patients achieved an ORR of 25.0% versus 18.6% for nonpretreated patients. This unexpected finding was partly attributed to differences in patient characteristics between the groups. Overall major grade 3 to 4 toxicities comprised neutropenia (66.6%), febrile neutropenia (31.7%), and mucositis (31.7%). Grade 3 to 4 toxicities were lower at the reduced 5-FU dose (750 mg/m2/day): Febrile neutropenia declined from 40.0% to 27.9%; mucositis declined from 55.0% to 20.9%. Three treatment-related deaths occurred (2 with 5-FU 750 mg/m2/day, 1 with 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2/day). Docetaxel-5-FU appears active in locally recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN with acceptable toxicity at the dose of 5-FU 750 mg/m2.

Docetaxel induction therapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) are often treated with induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, but to date without major impact on survival. The combination of cisplatin-5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (PF) has been used as standard induction therapy; however, poor patient survival has stimulated investigation into new agents with potential activity in SCCHN. Docetaxel has significant single-agent activity in SCCHN and has been investigated in combination with PF regimens as induction therapy. The results of six phase II studies of docetaxel-PF regimens (TPF) as induction in locally advanced SCCHN patients are reviewed and reported. Consistently, high 2-year survival rates and overall response rates were demonstrated across the phase II trials in the range 42-82 and 71-100%, respectively. The toxicity profile seen with TPF-based regimens was acceptable. The primary toxicity was neutropenia, which together with gastrointestinal complaints accounted for the majority of adverse events. Given the encouraging phase II experience with TPF-based regimens, two large-scale phase III studies comparing TPF-based regimens with standard PF regimens are underway. The results have significant potential for validating the findings of the phase II studies, demonstrating improved survival and overall response of patients treated with docetaxel-based induction chemotherapy.

A phase II trial of cisplatin and vinorelbine in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the response rate and the toxicity of cisplatin plus vinorelbine in patients with this condition.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Forty-two patients were included. Therapy consisted of cisplatin, 100 mg/m(2) on day 1, and vinorelbine, 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, given every 21 days. Therapy was continued up to six courses or progressive disease.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-nine courses were given (median, three per patient). Dose reduction was applied in 13% of courses and 43% of patients. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia appeared in 11% of courses and 35% of the patients. One patient died of febrile neutropenia. Ten percent of patients attained a complete response, and 23% attained a partial response (overall 33%, 95%CI 19%-47%). The median duration of response and median survival were 6 months. Twenty-four percent of patients remain alive at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of cisplatin and vinorelbine is moderately active in patients with recurrent or metastatic carcinomas of the head and neck and avoids the inconvenience of prolonged infusions of 5-fluorouracil.

Docetaxel alone or orally combined with 5-fluorouracil and its derivatives: effects on mouse mammary tumor cell line MM2 in vitro and in vivo

Although docetaxel (Taxotere; TXT), a taxoid anticancer drug, is clinically and experimentally very effective against breast cancer, its antitumor effect is of very short duration. We addressed whether 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and its derivatives can act synergistically with TXT against mammary tumors, with placing particular stress on their use by oral route. Mouse mammary tumor cell line, MM2, was propagated in culture and as ascites in mice. Carmofur (HCFU) and doxifluridine (5'-DFUR) were used as 5-FU derivatives. In vitro, the cytotoxic effects of antitumor drugs on MM2 cells were examined by MTS assay. In vivo, mice inoculated i.p. with MM2 cells were treated with i.p. injection of TXT and/or oral administration of 5-FU or its derivatives, and observed for curing tumor. In vitro, the synergistic effects were observed in the combination of TXT and 5-FU or HCFU, but not in that of TXT and 5'-DFUR. In vivo, all of these combinations cured tumors far more effectively than TXT alone. The discrepant result of the combination of TXT and 5'-DFUR between in vitro and in vivo was ascribed to up-regulation of pyrimidine phosphorylase in tumor cells in vivo by TXT. Thus, 5-FU, its masked compounds like HCFU and its prodrugs like 5'-DFUR can act synergistically with TXT in the therapy of cancer even when administered by the oral route.