Torsade de pointes after pipamperone intoxication

Therapeutic drug monitoring of common antipsychotics

The aim of this review is to provide information for interpreting outcome results from monitoring of antipsychotics in biological samples. A brief overview of the working mechanisms, pharmacological effects, drug interactions, and analytical methods of classical and atypical antipsychotics is given. Nineteen antipsychotics were selected based on their importance in the worldwide market as follows: amisulpride, aripiprazole, asenapine, bromperidol, clozapine, flupenthixol, haloperidol, iloperidone, lurasidone, olanzapine, paliperidone, perphenazine, pimozide, pipamperone, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, sulpiride, and zuclopenthixol. A straightforward relationship between administered dose, plasma or serum concentration, clinical outcome, or adverse effects is often lacking. Nowadays, focus lies on therapeutic drug monitoring and individualized therapy to find adequate treatment, to explain treatment failure or nonresponse, and to check patient compliance. However, extensive research in this field is still mandatory.

QTc prolongation by psychotropic drugs and the risk of Torsade de Pointes

INTRODUCTION

Many psychotropic drugs can delay cardiac repolarization and thereby prolong the rate-corrected QT interval (QTc). A prolonged QTc often arouses concern in clinical practice, as it can be followed, in rare cases, by the life-threatening polymorphic ventricular tachyarrhythmia called torsade de pointes (TdP).

METHOD

We searched PubMed for pertinent literature on the risk of QTc prolongation and/or TdP associated with commonly used psychotropic drugs.

RESULTS

Thioridazine and ziprasidone confer the highest risk of QTc prolongation and/or TdP. There is also a clinically significant risk associated with haloperidol given intravenously in high doses. TdP has been reported in a few cases in association with the use of newer antipsychotic drugs (mainly quetiapine and amisulpride), most of the tri- and tetracyclic antidepressants, and the selective monoamine reuptake inhibitors citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and venlafaxine. As a rule, however, QTc prolongation and/or TdP occur only in the presence of multiple additional risk factors, such as age over 65 years, pre-existing cardiovascular disease, bradycardia, female sex, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, a supratherapeutic or toxic serum concentration, or the simultaneous administration of other drugs that delay repolarization or interfere with drug metabolism.

CONCLUSION

Before prescribing a psychotropic drug, the physician should carefully assess its risks and benefits to avoid this type of adverse reaction, particularly when additional risk factors are present. The ECG and electrolytes should be regularly monitored in patients taking psychotropic drugs.

Risiken von Antipsychotika im Alter, speziell bei Demenzen 1Prof. Dr. Hans Gutzmann zum 60. Geburtstag gewidmet

Antipsychotika werden häufig zur Behandlung von herausforderndem Verhalten bei Demenz eingesetzt. Antipsychotika der zweiten Generation («atypische Neuroleptika») spielen dabei mittlerweile eine größere Rolle als die älteren Substanzen. Der nur mäßigen Wirksamkeit stehen schwerwiegende Risiken gegenüber: so ist unter allen Antipsychotika die Mortalität insgesamt erhöht, aber auch das Risiko für plötzlichen Herztod, Schlaganfallereignisse oder venöse Thrombosen. Die Unterschiede zwischen Antipsychotika der ersten und der zweiten Generation sind dabei gering: hochpotente Antipsychotika der ersten Generation führen häufiger zu extrapyramidalmotorischen Symptomen, unter Antipsychotika der zweiten Generation ist das allgemeine Mortalitätsrisiko wahrscheinlich etwas geringer, andererseits wahrscheinlich venöse Thrombosen und metabolische Nebenwirkungen häufiger. Für die übrigen Nebenwirkungen bestehen keine gesicherten Unterschiede. Angesichts der großen Heterogenität der Antipsychotika erscheint der Nutzen einer pauschalen Aufteilung in Antipsychotika der ersten und zweiten Generation fragwürdig. Für die Auswahl einer Substanz sind substanzspezifische Nebenwirkungen, Dosierung, Aufdosierungsgeschwindigkeit sowie Beachtung von Komorbidität, Kontraindikationen und Arzneimittelinteraktionen in Relation zum individuellen Patienten erheblich wichtiger als die Wahl nach bloßer pauschaler Zuordnung zu einer dieser beiden Gruppen. Am wichtigsten ist aber, dass Antipsychotika nur bei klarer Indikation zur Anwendung kommen!

The QT interval and psychotropic medications in children: recommendations for clinicians

The use of psychotropic medications in children has increased significantly in the last few years. There have been several case reports of sudden death in children taking specific psychotropic medications. Fears that these deaths might have been caused by ventricular arrhythmias have been enhanced by reports of electrocardiographic abnormalities, including prolongation of the QTc interval, in patients taking these medications. Several factors including genetic susceptibility, pre-existing cardiac disease, abnormalities of drug clearance and concomitant use of other medications known to affect the QTc interval can increase the susceptibility of the heart to conduction abnormalities. This article discusses the potential of particular psychotropic drugs to prolong the QTc interval in children, and examines other factors that may contribute to conduction abnormalities. We aim to provide clear clinical recommendations for the prescription of these drugs and the monitoring of children taking them.

Antipsychotikainduzierte QT-Verlängerung

Prolongation of myocardial repolarisation, i.e. lengthening of the QT interval on surface electrocardiogram, has been recognised as a side effect of many drugs, including antipsychotics. In predisposed individuals, abnormal excessive QT prolongation and severe ventricular arrhythmias (the ventricular tachycardia type 'torsade de pointes', or TdP) may occur. In almost all cases, additional factors are present that increase the propensity of patients to develop TdP, such as serum hypokalemia, the combination of drugs prolonging repolarisation, overdosing, intoxication, and factors interfering with drug metabolism and excretion. Serum hypokalemia and/or bradycardia may induce TdP alone, in the absence of drugs prolonging the QT interval. Experimental studies demonstrate that prolongation of myocardial repolarisation is a class effect of neuroleptics. Clinically, the extent to which individual drugs prolong the QT interval varies. Among the antipsychotics, thioridazine has the greatest propensity to induce abnormal QT prolongations and TdP. Case reports of TdP with other antipsychotics have been published. Physicians prescribing physicians these drugs must be aware that they can induce proarrhythmia in individual cases. They should also be aware of the circumstances which are necessary for abnormal QT prolongation and TdP to develop. Patients should be monitored with regard to these risk factors before and during drug treatment.

Different regulation of rat 5-HT(2A) and rat 5-HT(2C) receptors in NIH 3T3 cells upon exposure to 5-HT and pipamperone

The 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors belong to the same subtype of the G-protein coupled receptor family and have several agonist and antagonist ligands in common. To gain more insight into the differences in the regulation of the two receptors, we studied the effect of agonist and antagonist pre-treatment on radioligand receptor binding and 5-HT-induced inositol phosphate formation on rat 5-HT(2A) and rat 5-HT(2C) receptors stable expressed in NIH 3T3 cells. We compared short (15 min) and prolonged (48 h) pre-treatment of the cells with the natural agonist, 5-HT and with the antagonist pipamperone, which can be readily washed out. The rat 5-HT(2C) receptor showed an agonist-induced down-regulation (decrease in B(max) of labelled agonist and antagonist binding) and desensitisation (decrease in 5-HT-induced inositol phosphate formation and potency of 5-HT). Antagonist pre-treatment induced an increase in rat 5-HT(2C) receptor-mediated inositol phosphate formation as well as increased agonist and antagonist radioligand binding. These findings are consistent with the classical model of G-protein coupled receptor regulation. In contrast, the rat 5-HT(2A) receptor expressed in the same host cell behaved differently, unlike the classical model. Pre-treatment with 5-HT for 15 min and 48 h did not change receptor levels measured by radioligand binding, but the signal transduction response (inositol phosphate formation) was significantly reduced. Pre-treatment with the antagonist pipamperone for 15 min and 48 h caused an increase in antagonist radioligand binding but a reduction in agonist radioligand binding and a decrease in inositol phosphate formation and potency of 5-HT. Hence, the rat 5-HT(2A) receptor apparently undergoes agonist desensitisation without down-regulation of the total receptor number. Antagonist pre-treatment causes a paradoxical desensitisation, possibly by uncoupling of the receptor from G-proteins. The uncoupled receptor does not bind 5-HT in the nanomolar range but retains its antagonist binding properties. Paradoxical antagonist-induced desensitisation of rat 5-HT(2A) receptors has also been observed in vivo.