Biventricular pacing in end-stage heart failure improves functional capacity and left ventricular function

Evolution and prognosis of tricuspid and mitral regurgitation following cardiac implantable electronic devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Significant changes in tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and mitral regurgitation (MR) post-cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are increasingly recognized. However, uncertainty remains as to whether the risk of CIED-associated TR and MR differs with right ventricular pacing (RVP) via CIED with trans-tricuspid RV leads, compared with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), conduction system pacing (CSP), and leadless pacing (LP). The study aims to synthesize extant data on risk and prognosis of significant post-CIED TR and MR across pacing strategies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases published until 31 October 2023. Significant post-CIED TR and MR were defined as ≥ moderate. Fifty-seven TR studies (n = 13 723 patients) and 90 MR studies (n = 14 387 patients) were included. For all CIED, the risk of post-CIED TR increased [pooled odds ratio (OR) = 2.46 and 95% CI = 1.88-3.22], while the risk of post-CIED MR reduced (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58-0.94) after 12 and 6 months of median follow-up, respectively. Right ventricular pacing via CIED with trans-tricuspid RV leads was associated with increased risk of post-CIED TR (OR = 4.54, 95% CI = 3.14-6.57) and post-CIED MR (OR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.18-4.26). Binarily, CSP did not alter TR risk (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.13-1.02), but significantly reduced MR (OR = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.03-0.62). Cardiac resynchronization therapy did not significantly change TR risk (OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.55-2.17), but significantly reduced MR with prevalence pre-CRT of 43%, decreasing post-CRT to 22% (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.40-0.61). There was no significant association of LP with post-CIED TR (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.83-1.59) or MR (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 0.72-2.39). Cardiac implantable electronic device-associated TR was independently predictive of all-cause mortality [pooled hazard ratio (HR) = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.40-1.90] after median of 53 months. Mitral regurgitation persisting post-CRT independently predicted all-cause mortality (HR = 2.00, 95% CI = 1.57-2.55) after 38 months.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that, when possible, adoption of pacing strategies that avoid isolated trans-tricuspid RV leads may be beneficial in preventing incident or deteriorating atrioventricular valvular regurgitation and might reduce mortality.

[History of cardiac resynchronization therapy : 30 years of electrotherapeutic management for heart failure]

The first permanent biventricular pacing system was implanted more than 30 years ago. In this article, the historical development of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), starting with the pathophysiological concept, followed by the initial "proof of concept" studies and finally the large prospective-randomized studies that led to the implementation of CRT in heart failure guidelines, is outlined. Since the establishment of CRT, both an expansion of indications, e.g., for patients with mild heart failure and atrial fibrillation, but also the return to patients with broad QRS complex and left bundle branch block who benefit most of CRT has evolved. New techniques such as conduction system pacing will have major influence on pacemaker therapy in heart failure, both as an alternative or adjunct to CRT.

Physiologic Pacing Targeting the His Bundle and Left Bundle Branch: a Review of the Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Conduction system pacing (CSP) has emerged as a means to preserve or restore physiological ventricular activation via pacing at the His bundle or at more distal targets in the conduction system, including the left bundle branch area. This review examines strengths, weaknesses, and clinical applications of CSP performed via these approaches.

RECENT FINDINGS

His bundle pacing (HBP) has been successfully utilized for standard bradyarrhythmia indications and for QRS correction among patients receiving devices for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Limitations of HBP pacing have included implant complexity and rising pacing thresholds over time. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) appears to deliver similar physiological benefits with shorter implant times and more stable thresholds. More recently, hybrid systems utilizing HBP or LBBAP in combination with left ventricular leads have been used to treat heart failure (HF) patients, and may be useful in multilevel or mixed conduction blocks. There is growing interest in CSP for bradycardia and HF indications, although high quality data with randomized controlled trials are needed to help guide future treatment paradigms.

Vectorcardiographic QRS area as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a good treatment for heart failure accompanied by ventricular conduction abnormalities. Current ECG criteria in international guidelines seem to be suboptimal to select heart failure patients for CRT. The criteria QRS duration and left bundle branch block (LBBB) QRS morphology insufficiently detect left ventricular activation delay, which is required for benefit from CRT. Additionally, there are various definitions for LBBB, in which each one has a different association with CRT benefit and is prone to subjective interpretation. Recent studies have shown that the objectively measured vectorcardiographic QRS area identifies left ventricular activation delay with higher accuracy than any of the current ECG criteria. Indeed, various studies have consistently shown that a high QRS area prior to CRT predicts both echocardiographic and clinical improvement after CRT. The beneficial relation of QRS area with CRT-outcome was largely independent from QRS morphology, QRS duration, and patient characteristics known to affect CRT-outcome including ischemic etiology and sex. On top of QRS area prior to CRT, the reduction in QRS area after CRT further improves benefit. QRS area is easily obtainable from a standard 12-lead ECG though it currently requires off-line analysis. Clinical applicability will be significantly improved when QRS area is automatically determined by ECG equipment.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients: tough road but clear future

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) based on biventricular pacing (BVP) is an invaluable intervention currently used in heart failure (HF) patients. The therapy involves electromechanical dyssynchrony, which can not only improve heart function and quality of life but also reduce hospitalization and mortality rates. However, approximately 30% to 40% of patients remain unresponsive to conventional BVP in clinical practice. In the recent years, extensive research has been employed to find a more physiological approach to cardiac resynchronization. The His-Purkinje system pacing (HPSP) including His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) may potentially be the future of CRT. These technologies present various advantages including offering an almost real physiological pacing, less complicated procedures, and economic feasibility. Additionally, other methods, such as isolated left-ventricular pacing and multipoint pacing, may in the future be important but non-mainstream alternatives to CRT because currently, there is no strong evidence to support their effectiveness. This article reviews the current situation and latest progress in CRT, explores the existing technology, and highlights future prospects in the development of CRT.

His Bundle Pacing in Heart Failure-Concept and Current Data

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

His bundle pacing (HBP) has continued to emerge as a viable alternative to both right ventricular pacing (RVP) and cardiac resynchronization therapy. In recent years, a considerable amount of research has been published with regard to using HBP to treat congestive heart failure (CHF) and this article presents a concise yet comprehensive review of this literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies have demonstrated that HBP is useful for CHF patients who are non-responders to biventricular pacing (BiVP) or have a history of previously failed coronary sinus lead placement, right/left bundle branch block cardiomyopathy, or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Additionally, HBP is useful in patients with an indication for pacing who are expected to have a RVP burden exceeding 20%. The theoretical benefit of utilizing the native His Purkinje system to excite cardiac tissue is appealing as it can result in true cardiac resynchronization. Limited studies have shown its benefit in reducing heart failure symptoms and improving cardiac function. Larger randomized clinical trials and further investments into developing better technologies are highly desired to make its clinical use sustainable in the long run.

Updated Clinical Evidence for Effective Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Congestive Heart Failure and Timing of Implant

Investigative works of the past 20 years have compiled extensive data on the effectiveness and implications of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure. Since then, CRT has become a well-accepted and widely adapted adjunctive therapy for patients with heart failure with ventricular dyssynchrony. This overview discusses the updated knowledge on the benefits afforded with CRT and reviews the major clinical trials that have established CRT at its current practice. Based on the data, the indications of CRT and the timing of appropriate implant of CRT devices with respect to heart failure status will be presented.

Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing/Leadless Pacing

Several clinical trials have established the role of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure, impaired left ventricular function and dyssynchrony. Challenges to traditional therapy include coronary sinus anatomy and failure to respond. Left ventricular endocardial pacing could overcome anatomic constraints, provide more flexibility, and allow for more physiologic activation. Cases and case series have demonstrated the promise of the approach. Preclinical studies support the superior hemodynamic effects of left ventricular endocardial pacing. Leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing is a recent innovation that is undergoing prospective testing. Successful delivery may be associated with clinical response and positive cardiac structural remodeling.

Technology Advances to Improve Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: What Clinicians Should Know

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a well-established treatment for symptomatic heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, prolonged QRS duration, and abnormal QRS morphology. The ultimate goals of modern CRT are to improve the proportion of patients responding to CRT and to maximize the response to CRT in patients who do respond. While the rate of CRT nonresponders has moderately but progressively decreased over the last 20 years, mostly in patients with left bundle branch block, in patients without left bundle branch block the response rate is almost unchanged. A number of technological advances have already contributed to achieve some of the objectives of modern CRT. They include novel lead design (the left ventricular quadripolar lead, and multipoint pacing), or the possibility to go beyond conventional delivery of CRT (left ventricular endocardial pacing, His bundle pacing). Furthermore, to improve CRT response, a triad of actions is paramount: reducing the burden of atrial fibrillation, reducing the number of appropriate and inappropriate interventions, and adequately predicting heart failure episodes. As in other fields of cardiology, technology and innovations for CRT delivery have been at the forefront in transforming-improving-patient care; therefore, these innovations are discussed in this review.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with mild heart failure is a reversal therapy

This systematic review with meta-analysis sought to determine the efficacy, safety of implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in mild heart failure (HF). Medline, Embase, Elsevier, and Sciences online database as well as Google scholar literature were used for selecting appropriate studies with randomized controlled design. The literature search of all major databases retrieved 2035 studies. After screening, a total of 10 trials were identified that reported outcomes of interest. Pooled analysis was performed on left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (P < 0.001), LV end-diastolic volume (P < 0.001), LV end-systolic volume (P < 0.001), LV end-diastolic diameter (P < 0.001), LV end-systolic diameter (P < 0.001), incidence of progression of heart failure (P < 0.001), mortality (P = 0.06), infection (P = 0.1), and pneumothorax (P = 0.08). Overall, implantation of CRT in patients with asymptomatic and mild HF resulted in improved cardiac function, decreased progression of HF, trend to decrease of mortality in short to long-term follow-up.

Low Intensity Epicardial Pacing During the Absolute Refractory Period Augments Left Ventricular Function Mediated by Local Catecholamine Release

BACKGROUND

Biventricular epicardial (Epi) pacing can augment left ventricular (LV) function in heart failure. We postulated that these effects might involve catecholamine release from local autonomic nerve activation. To evaluate this hypothesis we applied low intensity Epi electrical stimuli during the absolute refractory period (ARP), thus avoiding altered activation sequence.

METHODS

Anesthetized pigs (n = 6) were instrumented with an LV pressure (LVP) transducer, left atrial (LA) and LV Epi pacing electrodes, and sonomicrometer segment length (SL) gauges placed proximal and remote to the LV stimulation site. A catheter was placed into the great cardiac vein adjacent to the LV pacing site for norepinephrine (NE) analysis. During LA pacing at constant rate, 3 pulses (0.8 milliseconds, 2-3x threshold) were applied to the LV Epi electrodes during the ARP. An experimental run consisted of baseline, stimulation (10 minutes), and recovery (5 minutes), repeated 3 times before and after β1 - receptor blockade (BB, metoprolol).

RESULTS

ARP stimulation produced significant increases in cardiac function reflected by elevated LVP, LV, dP/dtmax , and reduced time to LV dP/dtmax . This was accompanied by increased coronary NE levels and increases in LVP versus SL loop area in the remote myocardial segment. In contrast, the proximal segment exhibited early shortening and decreased loop area. BB abolished the changes in SL and LV function despite continued NE release.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that ARP EPI stimulation induces NE release mediating augmented global LV function. This effect may contribute to the beneficial effect of biventricular Epi pacing in heart failure in some patients.

Why QRS Duration Should Be Replaced by Better Measures of Electrical Activation to Improve Patient Selection for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a well-known treatment modality for patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction accompanied by a ventricular conduction delay. However, a large proportion of patients does not benefit from this therapy. Better patient selection may importantly reduce the number of non-responders. Here, we review the strengths and weaknesses of the electrocardiogram (ECG) markers currently being used in guidelines for patient selection, e.g., QRS duration and morphology. We shed light on the current knowledge on the underlying electrical substrate and the mechanism of action of CRT. Finally, we discuss potentially better ECG-based biomarkers for CRT candidate selection, of which the vectorcardiogram may have high potential.

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with chronic heart failure

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is common treatment for congestive heart failure (HF) with decreased LV function and wide QRS complex. Its foundations are set in the understanding of the pathophysiology of ventricular dyssynchrony. Over the last several decades, CRT has evolved through changes in implantation techniques, device and lead design, imaging modalities and our growing clinical experience. This review article will discuss the vast clinical experience that has led to current guidelines recommendations for CRT in patients with mild-to-severe HF. In addition, the article will also discuss recent evidence of benefits of CRT in patients beyond the guidelines. The article will also address the issue of non-responders, optimisation of CRT, postimplant evaluation and remote monitoring.

Strategies to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) emerged 2 decades ago as a useful form of device therapy for heart failure associated with abnormal ventricular conduction, indicated by a wide QRS complex. In this Review, we present insights into how to achieve the greatest benefits with this pacemaker therapy. Outcomes from CRT can be improved by appropriate patient selection, careful positioning of right and left ventricular pacing electrodes, and optimal timing of electrode stimulation. Left bundle branch block (LBBB), which can be detected on an electrocardiogram, is the predominant substrate for CRT, and patients with this conduction abnormality yield the most benefit. However, other features, such as QRS morphology, mechanical dyssynchrony, myocardial scarring, and the aetiology of heart failure, might also determine the benefit of CRT. No single left ventricular pacing site suits all patients, but a late-activated site, during either the intrinsic LBBB rhythm or right ventricular pacing, should be selected. Positioning the lead inside a scarred region substantially impairs outcomes. Optimization of stimulation intervals improves cardiac pump function in the short term, but CRT procedures must become easier and more reliable, perhaps with the use of electrocardiographic measures, to improve long-term outcomes.

A study of mechanical optimization strategy for cardiac resynchronization therapy based on an electromechanical model

An optimal electrode position and interventricular (VV) delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves its success. However, the precise quantification of cardiac dyssynchrony and magnitude of resynchronization achieved by biventricular (BiV) pacing therapy with mechanical optimization strategies based on computational models remain scant. The maximum circumferential uniformity ratio estimate (CURE) was used here as mechanical optimization index, which was automatically computed for 6 different electrode positions based on a three-dimensional electromechanical canine model of heart failure (HF) caused by complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB). VV delay timing was adjusted accordingly. The heart excitation propagation was simulated with a monodomain model. The quantification of mechanical intra- and interventricular asynchrony was then investigated with eight-node isoparametric element method. The results showed that (i) the optimal pacing location from maximal CURE of 0.8516 was found at the left ventricle (LV) lateral wall near the equator site with a VV delay of 60 ms, in accordance with current clinical studies, (ii) compared with electrical optimization strategy of E_RMS, the LV synchronous contraction and the hemodynamics improved more with mechanical optimization strategy. Therefore, measures of mechanical dyssynchrony improve the sensitivity and specificity of predicting responders more. The model was subject to validation in future clinical studies.

Event-free survival following CRT with surgically implanted LV leads versus standard transvenous approach

BACKGROUND

While surgical epicardial lead placement is performed in a subset of cardiac resynchronization therapy patients, data comparing survival following surgical versus transvenous lead placement are limited. We hypothesized that surgical procedures would be associated with increased mortality risk.

METHODS

Long-term event-free survival was assessed for 480 consecutive patients undergoing surgical (48) or percutaneous (432) left ventricle (LV) lead placement at our institution from January 2000 to September 2008.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics were similar between groups. While there was no statistically significant difference in overall event-free survival (P = 0.13), when analysis was restricted to surgical patients with isolated surgical lead placement (n = 28), event-free survival was significantly lower in surgical patients (P = 0.015). There appeared to be an early risk (first approximately 3 months postimplantation) with surgical lead placement, primarily in LV lead-only patients. Event rates were significantly higher in LV lead-only surgical patients than in transvenous patients in the first 3 months (P = 0.006). In proportional hazards analysis comparing isolated surgical LV lead placement to transvenous lead placement, adjusted hazard ratios were 1.8 ([1.1,2.7] P = 0.02) and 1.3 ([1.0,1.7] P = 0.07) for the first 3 months and for the full duration of follow-up, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated surgical LV lead placement appears to carry a small but significant upfront mortality cost, with risk extending beyond the immediate postoperative period. Long-term survival is similar, suggesting those surviving beyond this period of early risk derive the same benefit as coronary sinus lead recipients. Further work is needed to identify risk factors associated with early mortality following surgical lead placement.

Comparison of chronic biphasic pacing versus cathodal pacing of the right ventricle on left ventricular function in sheep after myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

The physiological effects of biphasic pacing have not been studied in compromised hearts.

METHODS

Myocardial infarction was induced in 12 sheep by high coronary artery ligation. Perioperative mortality was 33%. The surviving eight animals exhibited increased left ventricular volume and reduced percent fractional shortening. Two weeks after the infarction, sheep were implanted with atrial-triggered, right ventricular pacemaker systems capable of pacing with cathodal (cathodal pulse) and biphasic (anodal pulse followed by cathodal pulse) waveforms, and randomly assigned to an initial mode. At 3-month intervals, or whenever pacing was lost for any reason, the pacing system was switched to the alternative mode. Cardiac function was assessed at 2- to 3-week intervals through the use of echocardiograms. Successful pacing was confirmed over an average of 8 weeks in each mode.

RESULTS

Cathodal pulsing had neither beneficial nor deleterious effect on the diminished cardiac performance induced by myocardial infarction. When compared to the cathodal mode, biphasic pulsing improved cardiac performance as reflected by decrease of diastolic and systolic ventricular volumes, reduction in left ventricular systolic diameter, and increases in percent fractional shortening. When compared to the unpaced state after the myocardial infarction, the percent fractional shortening was significantly increased by biphasic pacing. Concordant trends in improvement in the other cardiac parameters were also observed for the biphasic mode. No ventricular tachyarrhythmias or mortality was associated with biphasic stimulation.

CONCLUSION

When compared to cathodal pacing, myocardial biphasic pacing has no safety issues in sheep that have undergone a large myocardial infarction. Importantly, biphasic pulsing elicited significant benefits in cardiac performance.

Trials on the effect of cardiac resynchronization on arterial blood pressure in patients with heart failure

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) increases cardiac performance in patients with heart failure, but its effect on arterial pressure is not well established. To determine the effect of CRT on systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse pressure (PP) a systematic review using standard nomenclatures for CRT was done in Scopus (MEDLINE and Embase), Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, National Institutes of Health http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov database, and bibliography of select meta-analyses for studies evaluating CRT in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Two independent investigators extracted the articles based on predefined criteria. The primary outcome was difference in arterial pressure parameters from baseline to after CRT in nonrandomized cohort trials. This was then validated by comparing the change in arterial pressure between CRT and medical therapy groups in randomized controlled trials. A random-effects model was used for analyses. Analyses of 15 nonrandomized studies showed that CRT resulted in an increase (from baseline) in SBP by 4.4 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8 to 8.0, p = 0.02), no change in DBP (p = 0.21), and an increase in PP by 2.8 mm Hg (95% CI 1.0 to 4.6, p = 0.003). Results from the 3 randomized controlled trials were concordant with an increase in SBP by 3.9 mm Hg (95% CI 1.1 to 6.8, p = 0.007), no effect on DBP (p = 0.40), and an increase in PP by 4.3 mm Hg (95% CI 4.1 to 4.5, p <0.001) compared to medical therapy. In conclusion, CRT is associated with a modest increase in SBP and PP in patients with heart failure.

Primary Results From the SmartDelay Determined AV Optimization: A Comparison to Other AV Delay Methods Used in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (SMART-AV) Trial

Background

One variable that may influence cardiac resynchronization therapy response is the programmed atrioventricular (AV) delay. The SmartDelay Determined AV Optimization: A Comparison to Other AV Delay Methods Used in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (SMART-AV) Trial prospectively randomized patients to a fixed empirical AV delay (120 milliseconds), echocardiographically optimized AV delay, or AV delay optimized with SmartDelay, an electrogram-based algorithm.

Methods and Results

A total of 1014 patients (68% men; mean age, 66±11 years; mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 25±7%) who met enrollment criteria received a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator, and 980 patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio. All patients were programmed (DDD-60 or DDDR-60) and evaluated after implantation and 3 and 6 months later. The primary end point was left ventricular end-systolic volume. Secondary end points included New York Heart Association class, quality-of-life score, 6-minute walk distance, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and left ventricular ejection fraction. The medians (quartiles 1 and 3) for change in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6 months for the SmartDelay, echocardiography, and fixed arms were −21 mL (−45 and 6 mL), −19 mL (−45 and 6 mL), and −15 mL (−41 and 6 mL), respectively. No difference in improvement in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6 months was observed between the SmartDelay and echocardiography arms ( P =0.52) or the SmartDelay and fixed arms ( P =0.66). Secondary end points, including structural (left ventricular end-diastolic volume and left ventricular ejection fraction) and functional (6-minute walk, quality of life, and New York Heart Association classification) measures, were not significantly different between arms.

Conclusions

Neither SmartDelay nor echocardiography was superior to a fixed AV delay of 120 milliseconds. The routine use of AV optimization techniques assessed in this trial is not warranted. However, these data do not exclude possible utility in selected patients who do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT00677014.

Surgical ventricular restoration: an operation to reverse remodeling - the basic science (part I)

Congestive heart failure as a consequence of ischemic heart disease is an increasing medical problem. Notwithstanding the huge advances in the medical and conventional surgical management of heart failure, eventual outcomes remain suboptimal. This 2 part article outlines the magnitude of the problem, the limitations of conventional therapies as they exist, and the use of newer procedures that directly address the restoration of ventricular pump function.

The first part of the article deals with the pathology of different facets of the remodeling process, and the unique anatomy, geometry and flow dynamics as they pertain to ventricular function in the normal as well as the failing heart. It then details the limitations of conventional therapy, thereby laying the basis for the need and evolution of newer surgical procedures and ends with the selection of patients for ventricular restoration procedures and the pitfalls in the choice of patients for such newer techniques.

SmartDelay determined AV optimization: a comparison of AV delay methods used in cardiac resynchronization therapy (SMART-AV): rationale and design

BACKGROUND

The clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for patients with moderate-to-severely symptomatic heart failure, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and ventricular conduction delay is established. However, some patients do not demonstrate clinical improvement following CRT. It is unclear whether systematic optimization of the programmed atrioventricular (AV) delay improves the rate of clinical response.

METHODS

SMART-AV is a randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, three-armed trial that will investigate the effects of optimizing AV delay timing in heart failure patients receiving CRT + defibrillator (CRT-D) therapy. A minimum of 950 patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio using randomly permuted blocks within each center programmed to either DDD or DDDR with a lower rate of 60. The study will include echocardiographic measurements of volumes and function [e.g., left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV)], biochemical measurements of plasma biomarker profiles, and functional measurements (e.g., 6-minute hall walk) in CRT-D patients who are enrolled and randomized to fixed AV delay (i.e., 120 ms), AV delay determined by electrogram-based SmartDelay, or an AV delay determined by echocardiography (i.e., mitral inflow). Patients will be evaluated prior to initiation of CRT, 3 and 6 months post-implant. The primary endpoint is the relative change in LVESV at 6 months between the groups. Patient enrollment commenced in May 2008 and the study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov.

CONCLUSION

SMART-AV is a randomized, clinical trial designed to evaluate three different methods of AV delay optimization to determine whether systematic AV optimization is beneficial for patients receiving CRT for 6 months post-implant.

Effects of left ventricular lead positions and coronary venous microanatomy on cardiac pacing parameters

We describe effects of pacing lead position and cardiac microanatomy on electrical pacing parameters. Passive fixation transvenous pacing leads were implanted in anterior interventricular veins in isolated swine hearts (n = 6). Electrical pacing parameters were measured in 3 implant positions (5 implant sites each): touching myocardial side of venous wall, not touching venous wall, and touching epicardial side of venous wall. After perfusion fixing hearts, veins were sectioned perpendicular to vein's length from base to apex. Slides were prepared and analyzed for measurement of vein wall thickness/circumference, and distances between vein walls and myocardium. Average pacing thresholds were greater when pacing leads were free-floating (5.45 +/- 3.29 V) or oriented in epicardial positions (6.81 +/- 2.96 V) compared with myocardial positions (3.79 +/- 3.46 V; P = not significant). Vein circumferences were significantly larger in basal regions (8.31 +/- 2.28 mm) compared with mid (6.90 +/- 1.46 mm) and apical (6.40 +/- 1.92 mm) regions (P < .05). Variability in pacing thresholds and impedances indicates that pacing lead placement in left ventricular coronary veins significantly affects electrical pacing parameters.

Biventricular pacing: impact on exercise-induced increases in mitral insufficiency in patients with chronic heart failure

INTRODUCTION

Mitral regurgitation (MR) in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients frequently worsens with exercise. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces MR at rest, but its effects on exercise-induced worsening of MR are incompletely explored. The present study examined the influence of CRT on MR during submaximal exercise in CHF patients.

METHODS

Eleven patients with CHF who were treated with CRT underwent echocardiography while performing steady-state exercise during four conduction modes (intrinsic rhythm, right ventricular [RV], biventricular [BiV] and left ventricular [LV] pacing). Measurements of MR were jet area planimetry, effective regurgitant orifice area, peak MR flow rate and regurgitant volume.

RESULTS

At rest and during exercise, there were no differences in dyssynchrony between intrinsic rhythm and RV pacing. BiV and LV pacing reduced dyssynchrony at rest and during exercise compared with intrinsic conduction and RV pacing, and there were no differences in the magnitude of these effects between these two pacing modes. At rest, RV pacing increased MR compared with intrinsic conduction (MR regurgitant volume; P<0.05), whereas BiV and LV pacing reduced MR (reductions in effective regurgitant orifice area and jet area; P<0.02, and MR flow rate; P<0.05 with BiV pacing from intrinsic conduction). MR significantly increased on exercise with intrinsic rhythm and RV pacing, whereas with LV and BiV pacing, there were no significant exercise-induced increases in any MR variable. There were relationships between changes in measures of dyssynchrony and reductions in MR at rest and during exercise.

CONCLUSIONS

CRT reduces MR at rest and during exercise, and prevents exercise-induced MR. Reductions in MR during exercise correlate with improvements in dyssynchrony.

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy: evidence based benefits and patient selection

Despite the improvement in pharmacologic treatment of heart failure, many patients continue to have severe persistent symptoms, and their prognosis remains poor. One of the most recent advances in heart failure management is the concept of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with right and left ventricular pacing. Large clinical trials have demonstrated morbidity and mortality benefits of CRT in patients with moderate to severe drug refractory heart failure (New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV), and ejection fraction < or = 35% with QRS duration > or = 120 ms. Despite the documented benefits, 20-30% of patients selected to have CRT do not respond to this treatment. Echocardiography will probably play a more important role in better selecting patients with mechanical dyssynchrony who are more likely to respond to CRT. This article reviews the available evidence for CRT as well as the way to select responders to this rather invasive therapy.

[Electrotherapy of cardiac failure]

Intracardiac conduction disturbances, mostly manifested as a left bundle branch block (LBBB), are common findings in cardiac failure and associated with a poor prognosis. LBBB is a marker of disease progression and also leads to worsened cardiac hemodynamics by dyssynchronous contraction that can accelerate progression of the underlying disease. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can reduce the negative effects of these disturbances leading to improvement in hemodynamics and long-term improvement in cardiopulmonary exercise tolerance, reduction of left ventricular volumes and functional mitral regurgitation. Prospective multicenter studies, such as the CARE-HF and COMPANION trials have demonstrated reduced mortality with CRT or combined treatment with defibrillator capability (CRT-D). Thus, CRT has been adopted in the current guidelines of cardiology societies. Nevertheless, there are a number of open issues with CRT, such as the high number of non-responders or the value of CRT in patients with atrial fibrillation, narrow QRS complex and mild cardiac failure or asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction. In addition, the question whether every CRT patient needs a device with defibrillating capabilities is not fully resolved, at least for patients with dilative cardiomyopathy.

A futuristic perspective on clinical studies of cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heart failure is a major public health problem. Many heart failure patients have electrical and mechanical ventricular dyssynchrony, which are risk factors for death in heart failure patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cardiac resynchronization therapy, by stimulating both ventricles, is a strategy to improve ventricular dyssynchrony.

SUMMARY

This paper describes the historic development of this therapy; reviews the results of completed clinical cardiac resynchronization therapy studies, and discusses ongoing and future studies.

Heart failure in older adults

Heart failure affects approximately 5 million Americans, half of whom are at least 75 years of age, and is the leading cause of hospital admission among older adults. Additionally, the prevalence of heart failure is increasing, largely owing to the aging of the population. Heart failure in older adults differs in many respects from heart failure that occurs during middle age, including an increased proportion of women, increasing prevalence of heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function, and a marked increase in the number of coexisting medical conditions. In light of these factors, this article reviews the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features, and treatment of heart failure in older adults.

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy in heart failure: Current status

Cardiac resynchronization in heart failure already has a history of 12 years. However, the major advances have been the result of large multi center trials dating from 2001. In all these trials patients with a LVEF < or = 35% were included, and a QRS above 120 msec. Follow up was from 3-36 months. The majority of these trials showed a positive effect in reduction of composite and points of death or hospitalization for major cardiovascular events. Many of these trials also showed a diminution of left ventricular and systolic diameter or volume. Even in NYHA class II patients an improvement was seen. Some unanswered questions still remain as regards the agreement on electrical or electromechanical dyssynchrony criteria. There is a number of patients with "wide" QRS who do not improve and conversely a number of patients with a narrow QRS who witness improvement. The benefit in patients with atrial fibrillation also remains unanswered. Finally the value of this modality in patients with mild heart failure or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, NYHA class I-II remains to be determined in large on going trials. Another question is whether biventricular or left ventricular patient is preferable. Finally whether biventricular patient should be complemented by a defibrillator insertion is being currently studied. Cardiac resynchronization therapy along or in combination with an ICD improves symptoms, reduces major morbidity and mortality in patients with a left ventricular EF<35%, ventricular dilatation and a QRS > or = 120 msec in NYHA class III-IV. Further indications are currently being examined.