Superiority of high-dose platinum (cisplatin and carboplatin) compared to carboplatin alone in combination chemotherapy for small-cell lung carcinoma: a prospective randomised trial of 280 consecutive patients

Pushing the boundaries of innovation: the potential of ex vivo organ perfusion from an interdisciplinary point of view

Ex vivo machine perfusion (EVMP) is an emerging technique for preserving explanted solid organs with primary application in allogeneic organ transplantation. EVMP has been established as an alternative to the standard of care static-cold preservation, allowing for prolonged preservation and real-time monitoring of organ quality while reducing/preventing ischemia-reperfusion injury. Moreover, it has paved the way to involve expanded criteria donors, e.g., after circulatory death, thus expanding the donor organ pool. Ongoing improvements in EVMP protocols, especially expanding the duration of preservation, paved the way for its broader application, in particular for reconditioning and modification of diseased organs and tumor and infection therapies and regenerative approaches. Moreover, implementing EVMP for in vivo-like preclinical studies improving disease modeling raises significant interest, while providing an ideal interface for bioengineering and genetic manipulation. These approaches can be applied not only in an allogeneic and xenogeneic transplant setting but also in an autologous setting, where patients can be on temporary organ support while the diseased organs are treated ex vivo, followed by reimplantation of the cured organ. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the differences and similarities in abdominal (kidney and liver) and thoracic (lung and heart) EVMP, focusing on the organ-specific components and preservation techniques, specifically on the composition of perfusion solutions and their supplements and perfusion temperatures and flow conditions. Novel treatment opportunities beyond organ transplantation and limitations of abdominal and thoracic EVMP are delineated to identify complementary interdisciplinary approaches for the application and development of this technique.

[Prevention, Diagnosis, Therapy, and Follow-up of Lung Cancer - Interdisciplinary Guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Cancer Society - Abridged Version]

The current S3 Lung Cancer Guidelines are edited with fundamental changes to the previous edition based on the dynamic influx of information to this field:The recommendations include de novo a mandatory case presentation for all patients with lung cancer in a multidisciplinary tumor board before initiation of treatment, furthermore CT-Screening for asymptomatic patients at risk (after federal approval), recommendations for incidental lung nodule management , molecular testing of all NSCLC independent of subtypes, EGFR-mutations in resectable early stage lung cancer in relapsed or recurrent disease, adjuvant TKI-therapy in the presence of common EGFR-mutations, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in resected lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, obligatory evaluation of PD-L1-status, consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy in patients with PD-L1-pos. tumor, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition in patients withPD-L1 ≥ 50% stage IIIA and treatment options in PD-L1 ≥ 50% tumors independent of PD-L1status and targeted therapy and treatment option immune chemotherapy in first line SCLC patients.Based on the current dynamic status of information in this field and the turnaround time required to implement new options, a transformation to a "living guideline" was proposed.

First-line chemotherapy in metastatic small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)

The overall treatment results in metastatic small-cell lung cancer have not been changed in the last decades. The prognosis of the disease is still poor with median survival times of less than one year and nearly no chance of cure. This article intends to summarize the current status of treatment in m-SCLC and especially focuses on the aspects of choice of drugs and efforts of treatment intensification either by dose escalation or shortening of treatment intervals. Furthermore the currently available data about the activity of newer drugs, including taxanes and topoisomerase I inhibitors are reported. These cytostatic agents widen the therapeutic options in the treatment of SCLC and will hopefully improve the outcome of the patients in the next years.

Long-term survival in SCLC after treatment with paclitaxel, carboplatin and etoposide--a phase II study

PURPOSE

We evaluated the toxicity and feasibility of adding paclitaxel to a standard platinum/etoposide regimen in the first-line treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-nine patients with limited disease (LD) or extensive disease without distant metastases (ED I) were treated in this multi-centered phase II trial between April 1996 and June 1997. Paclitaxel administration (175 mg/m(2) by a 1 h intravenous infusion) was immediately followed by a 30 min infusion of carboplatin at an area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of 5 on day 1 and etoposide 50 mg orally twice daily (bid) was given on days 2-8. Courses were repeated every 21 days. Patients who had an objective response continued treatment for a maximum of 6 courses.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were assessable for response. Overall response rate (RR) was 82.1% with 17.8% complete remissions and 64.3% partial remissions. Median survival for LD patients was 20.5 months with a 1 year survival rate of 71.4% and a 3 year survival rate of 21.4%. Median survival of ED I patients was 11 months with a 1 year survival rate of 31.3% and a 3 year survival rate of 3.1%. Overall median survival was 18.1 months with a 1 year survival rate of 56.8% and a 3 year survival rate of 14.8%. Median progression-free intervals were 12.3 months for patients with LD stage of the disease and 8 months with ED I stage. Grade 3/4 toxicity was primarily hematologic. Grade 3/4 leucopenia occurred in 16.0% of courses and febrile episodes were detected in 0.3% of courses. Non-hematologic toxicities were uncommon. Grade 3 GI-tract toxicities or peripheral neuropathy appeared in less than 1% of the courses. Toxicities were detected according to WHO toxicity criteria.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel can be added at full dose (175 mg/m(2)) to a carboplatin/etoposide combination while maintaining a tolerable toxicity profile. Efficacy data, RR, progression-free interval and survival in both, extensive and limited stage patients compare favorably with other reported data. This new regimen will be further evaluated in comparison to standard regimens in a phase III trial.

Phase II study of carboplatin and 1-h intravenous etoposide and paclitaxel in a novel sequence as first-line treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of paclitaxel, carboplatin and etoposide when administered in combination to previously-untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients (n=95) with limited-stage disease (LSD; n=45) or extensive-stage disease (ESD; n=50) from 14 Spanish hospitals were entered into the study. Etoposide was administered 80 mg/m(2)/day intravenous (i.v.) on days 1, 2 and 3, paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 3 and carboplatin area-under-the-concentration-time-curve=6; i.v. on day 3, of a 3-week cycle, and repeated for up to 6 cycles.

RESULTS

The overall response (OR) rate was 74% (n=70; 32 complete, 38 partial). Although the OR in LSD and ESD patients was similar (73 vs 74%, respectively), the percentage complete response was significantly higher among the former (49 vs 20%). The main toxicities were grade 3-4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (62 and 18%, respectively) and there were 3 toxic deaths. Other toxicities were rare or easily manageable. Disease-free survival and overall survival rates at 1 year were 53 and 70% in LSD and 18 and 39% in ESD patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that the combination of paclitaxel, etoposide and carboplatin has an anti-tumour activity in SCLC that is comparable to other combination regimens, and is well tolerated.

A phase II randomised trial comparing the cisplatin-etoposide combination chemotherapy with or without carboplatin as second-line therapy for small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

A phase II randomised trial was performed with patients with SCLC to determine if the addition of carboplatin to cisplatin-etoposide might improve the response rate in second-line therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-five eligible patients were randomised: 31 for CE (cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) on days 1-3) and 34 for CCE (carboplatin 200 mg/m(2) on day 1, cisplatin 30 mg/m(2) on days 2-3, etoposide 100 mg/m(2) on days 1-3).

RESULTS

Eighty-two per cent of these patients had an objective response to first-line therapy and, among responders, 63% had a treatment-free interval of >3 months after previous therapy. The best response rates were 29% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13-45] and 47% (95% CI 30-64) for CE and CCE, respectively, with median survival times of 4.3 and 7.6 months. Dose-intensity analysis revealed a significant improvement in the relative dose-intensity and etoposide absolute dose-intensity for CE. Toxicity was tolerable and comparable between the two study arms.

CONCLUSION

CCE appears to be associated with a high objective response rate. The phase II randomised study design suggests that a comparison between the two regimens in a phase III trial would be interesting, but will probably be difficult to perform for reasons of accrual.