1
|
Schütte W, Gütz S, Nehls W, Blum TG, Brückl W, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Büttner R, Christopoulos P, Delis S, Deppermann KM, Dickgreber N, Eberhardt W, Eggeling S, Fleckenstein J, Flentje M, Frost N, Griesinger F, Grohé C, Gröschel A, Guckenberger M, Hecker E, Hoffmann H, Huber RM, Junker K, Kauczor HU, Kollmeier J, Kraywinkel K, Krüger M, Kugler C, Möller M, Nestle U, Passlick B, Pfannschmidt J, Reck M, Reinmuth N, Rübe C, Scheubel R, Schumann C, Sebastian M, Serke M, Stoelben E, Stuschke M, Thomas M, Tufman A, Vordermark D, Waller C, Wolf J, Wolf M, Wormanns D. [Prevention, Diagnosis, Therapy, and Follow-up of Lung Cancer - Interdisciplinary Guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Cancer Society - Abridged Version]. Pneumologie 2023; 77:671-813. [PMID: 37884003 DOI: 10.1055/a-2029-0134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
The current S3 Lung Cancer Guidelines are edited with fundamental changes to the previous edition based on the dynamic influx of information to this field:The recommendations include de novo a mandatory case presentation for all patients with lung cancer in a multidisciplinary tumor board before initiation of treatment, furthermore CT-Screening for asymptomatic patients at risk (after federal approval), recommendations for incidental lung nodule management , molecular testing of all NSCLC independent of subtypes, EGFR-mutations in resectable early stage lung cancer in relapsed or recurrent disease, adjuvant TKI-therapy in the presence of common EGFR-mutations, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in resected lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, obligatory evaluation of PD-L1-status, consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy in patients with PD-L1-pos. tumor, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition in patients withPD-L1 ≥ 50% stage IIIA and treatment options in PD-L1 ≥ 50% tumors independent of PD-L1status and targeted therapy and treatment option immune chemotherapy in first line SCLC patients.Based on the current dynamic status of information in this field and the turnaround time required to implement new options, a transformation to a "living guideline" was proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Schütte
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Krankenhaus Martha Maria Halle-Dölau, Halle (Saale)
| | - Sylvia Gütz
- St. Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Leipzig, Abteilung für Innere Medizin I, Leipzig
| | - Wiebke Nehls
- Klinik für Palliativmedizin und Geriatrie, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring
| | - Torsten Gerriet Blum
- Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Berlin
| | - Wolfgang Brückl
- Klinik für Innere Medizin 3, Schwerpunkt Pneumologie, Klinikum Nürnberg Nord
| | | | - Reinhard Büttner
- Institut für Allgemeine Pathologie und Pathologische Anatomie, Uniklinik Köln, Berlin
| | | | - Sandra Delis
- Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Berlin
| | | | - Nikolas Dickgreber
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Thoraxonkologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Klinikum Rheine
| | | | - Stephan Eggeling
- Vivantes Netzwerk für Gesundheit, Klinikum Neukölln, Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, Berlin
| | - Jochen Fleckenstein
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes und Medizinische Fakultät der Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg
| | - Michael Flentje
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg
| | - Nikolaj Frost
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Infektiologie/Pneumologie, Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
| | - Frank Griesinger
- Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg
| | | | - Andreas Gröschel
- Klinik für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Clemenshospital, Münster
| | | | | | - Hans Hoffmann
- Klinikum Rechts der Isar, TU München, Sektion für Thoraxchirurgie, München
| | - Rudolf M Huber
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik V, Thorakale Onkologie, LMU Klinikum Munchen
| | - Klaus Junker
- Klinikum Oststadt Bremen, Institut für Pathologie, Bremen
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- Klinikum der Universität Heidelberg, Abteilung Diagnostische Radiologie, Heidelberg
| | - Jens Kollmeier
- Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Berlin
| | | | - Marcus Krüger
- Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, Krankenhaus Martha-Maria Halle-Dölau, Halle-Dölau
| | | | - Miriam Möller
- Krankenhaus Martha-Maria Halle-Dölau, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Halle-Dölau
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Kliniken Maria Hilf, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Mönchengladbach
| | | | - Joachim Pfannschmidt
- Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin
| | - Martin Reck
- Lungeclinic Grosshansdorf, Pneumologisch-onkologische Abteilung, Grosshansdorf
| | - Niels Reinmuth
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Thorakale Onkologie, Asklepios Lungenklinik Gauting, Gauting
| | - Christian Rübe
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Homburg
| | | | | | - Martin Sebastian
- Medizinische Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt
| | - Monika Serke
- Zentrum für Pneumologie und Thoraxchirurgie, Lungenklinik Hemer, Hemer
| | | | - Martin Stuschke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen
| | - Michael Thomas
- Thoraxklinik am Univ.-Klinikum Heidelberg, Thorakale Onkologie, Heidelberg
| | - Amanda Tufman
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik V, Thorakale Onkologie, LMU Klinikum München
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Halle, Halle
| | - Cornelius Waller
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg
| | | | - Martin Wolf
- Klinikum Kassel, Klinik für Onkologie und Hämatologie, Kassel
| | - Dag Wormanns
- Evangelische Lungenklinik, Radiologisches Institut, Berlin
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tanaka LF, Figueroa SH, Popova V, Klug SJ, Buttmann-Schweiger N. The Rising Incidence of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2023; 120:59-64. [PMID: 36471648 PMCID: PMC10080225 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of early-onset (diagnosis before age 50) colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is increasing in some high-income countries. In this study, we examined the trends in EO-CRC incidence in Germany. METHODS We obtained data on CRC (ICD-10 C18-C20) incidence from the Centre for Cancer Registry Data (excluding cases reported via death certificate only) and on mortality from the official cause of death statistics for 1999-2018 from registries with sufficient incidence coverage. To assess time trends for persons aged 20-49 we calculated the average annual percent changes (AAPC) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The incidence analyses were stratified by sex, site (proximal colon, distal colon, rectum), age group (20-29, 30-39, and 40-49) and tumor size (T). RESULTS EO-CRC accounted for 5.1% (9529 cases) of all colorectal cancers in the selected German regions. The EO-CRC incidence rose annually by 1.16% (95% CI: [0.51; 1.81]) in men and 1.32% [0.80; 1.84] in women. The incidence of proximal colon cancer increased in both sexes (men: AAPC = 3.26 [2.00; 4.53]; women: AAPC = 2.99 [2.17; 3.83]), while the incidence of distal colon cancer remained unchanged. CONCLUSION The incidence of EO-CRC in Germany is rising. The reasons are probably multifactorial, reflecting the changing prevalence of early life exposure to risk and protective factors.
Collapse
|
3
|
Groeben C, Koch R, Kraywinkel K, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Baunacke M, Borkowetz A, Thomas C, Huber J. Development of Incidence and Surgical Treatment of Penile Cancer in Germany from 2006 to 2016: Potential Implications for Future Management. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:9190-9198. [PMID: 34120266 PMCID: PMC8591000 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10189-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Penile cancer is a rare disease and surgical treatment often entails a significant impact on quality of life. The aim of this study was to analyze trends in surgical treatment patterns in Germany. METHODS We analyzed data from the nationwide German hospital billing database and the German cancer registry from 2006 to 2016. All penile cancer cases with penile surgery or lymph node dissection (LND) were included. We also analyzed the distribution of cases, extent of surgery, and length of hospital stay, stratified for annual caseload. The geographical distribution of centers for 2016 was presented. RESULTS During the investigated timespan, tumor incidences increased from 748 to 971 (p = 0.001). We identified 11,353 penile surgery cases, increasing from 886 to 1196 (p < 0.001), and 5173 cases of LND, increasing from 332 to 590 (p < 0.001). Cases of partial amputation increased from 45.8 to 53.8% (p < 0.001), while total amputation remained stable at 11.2%. Caseload in high-volume hospitals increased from 9.0 to 18.8% for penile surgery (p < 0.001) and from 0 to 13.1% for LND (p < 0.001). The increase in LND caseload was caused by an increase in inguinal LND, from 297 to 505 (p < 0.001), with increasing sentinel LND, from 14.2 to 21.9% (p = 0.098). The assessment of geographical distribution of cases in Germany revealed extensive areas without sufficient coverage by experienced centers. CONCLUSIONS We saw consistent increases in penile surgery and LND, with a growing number of cases in high-volume hospitals, and, accordingly, an increase in tumor incidence. The increasing use of inguinal LND and organ-preserving surgery reflect the adaptation of current guidelines; however, geographical distribution of experienced centers could be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christer Groeben
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Rainer Koch
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Klaus Kraywinkel
- National Center for Cancer Registry Data, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Martin Baunacke
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Angelika Borkowetz
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christian Thomas
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Johannes Huber
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Thamm R, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Fiebig J, Poethko-Müller C, Prütz F, Sarganas G, Neuhauser H. [Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among children and adolescents in Germany-an overview]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2021; 64:1483-1491. [PMID: 34731291 PMCID: PMC8563819 DOI: 10.1007/s00103-021-03448-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Hintergrund SARS-CoV-2-Antikörperstudien ergänzen und erweitern die Erkenntnisse aus der Meldestatistik laborbestätigter COVID-19-Fälle um Informationen zu unentdeckten Fällen. Ziel der Arbeit Der vorliegende Beitrag fasst bisherige Ergebnisse zur SARS-CoV-2-Prävalenz aus seroepidemiologischen Studien in Deutschland zusammen, die sich auf Kinder und Jugendliche konzentrieren, und ergänzt die bereits vorliegende Übersicht zur Seroprävalenz bei Erwachsenen und speziell bei Blutspendenden in Deutschland. Material und Methoden Die Ergebnisse der Übersichtsarbeit beruhen auf einer fortlaufenden systematischen Recherche in Studienregistern, Literaturdatenbanken, von Preprint-Veröffentlichungen und Medienberichten seroepidemiologischer Studien in Deutschland sowie deren Ergebnissen. Ergebnisse Mit Stand 17.09.2021 sind uns 16 deutsche seroepidemiologische Studien, die sich auf Kinder und Jugendliche konzentrieren, bekannt geworden. Für 9 dieser Studien liegen Ergebnisse vor. Für fast alle untersuchten Settings lag die SARS-CoV-2-Seroprävalenz für Kinder im Kita- und Grundschulalter in der ersten COVID-19-Welle deutlich unter 1 % und für Jugendliche unter 2 %. Im Verlauf der Pandemie wurden höhere Seroprävalenzen von bis zu 8 % für Kinder im Grundschulalter ermittelt. Diskussion Ergebnisse von SARS-CoV-2-Antikörperstudien bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland liegen bislang erst in geringem Umfang und basierend auf lokal-regionalen, nichtrepräsentativen Stichproben vor. In künftigen Studien gilt es, einerseits abzuschätzen, welcher Anteil der Kinder und Jugendlichen bereits eine Infektion hatte oder geimpft ist. Zum anderen gilt es, die Verbreitung körperlicher und psychischer Beeinträchtigungen im Nachgang einer Infektion zu untersuchen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roma Thamm
- Abteilung Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut, General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - Nina Buttmann-Schweiger
- Abteilung Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut, General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Julia Fiebig
- Abteilung Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut, General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Christina Poethko-Müller
- Abteilung Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut, General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Franziska Prütz
- Abteilung Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut, General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Giselle Sarganas
- Abteilung Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut, General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Hannelore Neuhauser
- Abteilung Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut, General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Groeben C, Koch R, Kraywinkel K, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Baunacke M, Borkowetz A, Thomas C, Huber J. ASO Author Reflections: How Many Centers Do We Need for High-Quality Penile Cancer Surgery in Germany? An Analysis of Total Population Data from 2006 to 2016. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:9199-9200. [PMID: 34132952 PMCID: PMC8590994 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10306-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christer Groeben
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Rainer Koch
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Klaus Kraywinkel
- National Center for Cancer Registry Data, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Martin Baunacke
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Angelika Borkowetz
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christian Thomas
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Johannes Huber
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Woopen H, Rolf C, Braicu EI, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Barnes B, Baum J, Pietzner K, Kraywinkel K, Sehouli J. Secondary malignancies in long-term ovarian cancer survivors: results of the 'Carolin meets HANNA' study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:709-712. [PMID: 33649156 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the rate of secondary malignancies in long-term survivors with ovarian cancer. METHODS Long-term survivors with ovarian cancer (survival ≥8 years after initial diagnosis) with multiple malignancies were identified within the Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer and our study 'Carolin meets HANNA - Holistic Analyses of Long-term Survivors with Ovarian Cancer'. RESULTS Of a total of 225 long-term survivors with ovarian cancer, 36 patients (16%) had at least one more cancer diagnosis before, concomitant with, or after, ovarian cancer. Median age was 52.5 years (range 37-79). A total of 60% were diagnosed with stage III/IV and most tumors were high-grade (88.6%), as well as of serous histology (63.9%). Median overall survival was 10 years (range 8-19). Secondary cancer after ovarian cancer was found in 17 long-term survivors (7.6%). Breast cancer was the most frequent secondary malignancy. Median duration between diagnosis of primary ovarian cancer and secondary cancer diagnosis was 78.5 months (range 12-220). BRCA was tested in 11 patients with seven patients being BRCA1 and one patient BRCA2 positive. Secondary cancers were detected by screening in 35.3% and self-detected in 29.4% of patients (breast self-examination). CONCLUSION A secondary malignancy was diagnosed in 7.6% of long-term survivors. Routine follow-up and cancer screening should be performed in long-term ovarian cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Woopen
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charite-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Rolf
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charite-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elena Ioana Braicu
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charite-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Benjamin Barnes
- Centre for Cancer Registry Data, Robert Koch Institut, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joanna Baum
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charite-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus Pietzner
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charite-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus Kraywinkel
- Centre for Cancer Registry Data, Robert Koch Institut, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charite-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hoebel J, Busch MA, Grabka MM, Zinn S, Allen J, Göfêwald A, Wernitz J, Goebel J, Steinhauer HW, Siegers R, Schroder C, Kuttig T, Butschalowsky H, Schlaud M, Rosario AS, Brix J, Rysina A, Glemser A, Neuhauser H, Stahlberg S, Kneuer A, Hey I, Schaarschmidt J, Fiebig J, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Wilking H, Michel J, Nitsche A, Wieler LH, Schaade L, Ziese T, Liebig S, Lampert T. Seroepidemiological study on the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Germany: Study protocol of the CORONA-MONITORING bundesweit' study (RKI-SOEP study). J Health Monit 2021; 6:2-16. [PMID: 35585914 PMCID: PMC8832365 DOI: 10.25646/7853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has spread rapidly across Germany. Infections are likely to be under-recorded in the notification data from local health authorities on laboratory-confirmed cases since SARS-CoV-2 infections can proceed with few symptoms and then often remain undetected. Seroepidemiological studies allow the estimation of the proportion in the population that has been infected with SARS-CoV-2 (seroprevalence) as well as the extent of undetected infections. The ‘CORONA-MONITORING bundesweit’ study (RKI-SOEP study) collects biospecimens and interview data in a nationwide population sample drawn from the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP). Participants are sent materials to self-collect a dry blood sample of capillary blood from their finger and a swab sample from their mouth and nose, as well as a questionnaire. The samples returned are tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies and SARS-CoV-2 RNA to identify past or present infections. The methods applied enable the identification of SARS-CoV-2 infections, including those that previously went undetected. In addition, by linking the data collected with available SOEP data, the study has the potential to investigate social and health-related differences in infection status. Thus, the study contributes to an improved understanding of the extent of the epidemic in Germany, as well as identification of target groups for infection protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Hoebel
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | - Markus A Busch
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | - Markus M Grabka
- German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin, Socio-Economic Panel
| | - Sabine Zinn
- German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin, Socio-Economic Panel.,Humboldt University Berlin Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
| | - Jennifer Allen
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | - Antje Göfêwald
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | - Jörg Wernitz
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | - Jan Goebel
- German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin, Socio-Economic Panel
| | | | - Rainer Siegers
- German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin, Socio-Economic Panel
| | - Carsten Schroder
- German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin, Socio-Economic Panel.,Freie Universität Berlin School of Business and Economics
| | - Tim Kuttig
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | - Hans Butschalowsky
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | - Martin Schlaud
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | | | | | | | | | - Hannelore Neuhauser
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | - Silke Stahlberg
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | - Antje Kneuer
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | - Isabell Hey
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | - Jörg Schaarschmidt
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | - Julia Fiebig
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | | | - Hendrik Wilking
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology
| | - Janine Michel
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens
| | - Andreas Nitsche
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens
| | - Lothar H Wieler
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Institute Leadership.,Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Methodology and Research Infrastructure
| | - Lars Schaade
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens.,Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Institute Leadership
| | - Thomas Ziese
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | - Stefan Liebig
- German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin, Socio-Economic Panel
| | - Thomas Lampert
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Medenwald D, Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A, Kapsner LA, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Hopff S, Schmidt H, Vordermark D. Onkologische Versorgungsforschung in Deutschland. Forum 2021; 36:492-496. [PMCID: PMC8522174 DOI: 10.1007/s12312-021-00996-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Neben der prospektiven Versorgungsforschung mit ihrem qualitativen und quantitativen Ansatz sind retrospektive Datenquellen essenziell zur Beurteilung von Prozessen im Gesundheitswesen. In Deutschland ermöglichen strukturelle Veränderungen in den Krebsregistern bzw. die Etablierung neuer Datenquellen interessante Möglichkeiten für die Versorgungsforschung. So wurde mit der Medizininformatik-Initiative eine Vernetzung klinischer Einrichtungen aufgebaut, womit sich schnelle, sektorübergreifende und lebensnahe Analysen realisieren lassen. Durch die Neustrukturierung der Krebsregister sollen bevölkerungsbasierte Erhebungen im onkologischen Bereich vereinfacht und die Detailtreue der Daten erhöht werden. Die Folgen der COVID-19-Pandemie (Coronavirus-Krankheit 2019) im onkologischen Bereich lassen sich dabei über das neu geschaffene Nationale Pandemie Kohorten Netz (NAPKON), ein Zusammenschluss universitärer und nichtuniversitärer Gesundheitsdienstleister, abbilden. Durch die Einbeziehung der Akteure im Gesundheitswesen und unter der Mitwirkung prospektiver Studien lässt sich damit ein umfassendes Bild des onkologischen Versorgungsgeschehens in Deutschland zeichnen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Medenwald
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120 Halle (Saale), Deutschland
- AG Onkologische Versorgungsforschung, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Deutschland
| | | | - Lorenz A. Kapsner
- Medizinisches Zentrum für Informations- und Kommunikationstechnik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
- Radiologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Deutschland
| | | | - Sina Hopff
- Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Heike Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120 Halle (Saale), Deutschland
- Institut für Gesundheits- und Pflegewissenschaft, Medizinische Fakultät, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Deutschland
- AG Lebensqualität, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Deutschland
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120 Halle (Saale), Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Poethko-Müller C, Prütz F, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Fiebig J, Sarganas G, Seeling S, Thamm R, Baumann J, Hamouda O, Offergeld R, Schaade L, Lampert T, Neuhauser H. German and international studies on SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence. J Health Monit 2020; 5:2-15. [PMID: 35146294 PMCID: PMC8734155 DOI: 10.25646/7024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Since the beginning of the year 2020, the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has spread globally at a tremendous pace. Studies on the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the population help estimate the number of people that have already been infected. They also allow an estimate of the number of undetected infections i.e. infections that do not appear in data on officially reported cases. The interpretation of study results needs to consider bias from selective sampling and the diagnostic test properties. To promote networking and co-operation between scientists, the Robert Koch Institute has compiled an overview of the seroepidemiological studies conducted in Germany on its website, which is regularly updated. The RKI conducts searches, for example of press releases, study registry entries or preprint server publications, and contacts the lead investigators of these studies. Of the 40 studies contacted so far, 24 have already provided information (as of 25.06.2020). We can differentiate between studies of the general population, of selected population groups such as healthcare workers, or of ongoing cohorts. This article provides an overview of such studies from Germany, but also of selected international studies. A special focus is set on studies of children and adolescents, which are now of particular interest due to the planned reopening of childcare facilities and schools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Franziska Prütz
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | | | - Julia Fiebig
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | - Giselle Sarganas
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | - Stefanie Seeling
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | - Roma Thamm
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | - Jan Baumann
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Centre for International Health Protection
| | - Osamah Hamouda
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology
| | - Ruth Offergeld
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology
| | - Lars Schaade
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Vice president
| | - Thomas Lampert
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| | - Hannelore Neuhauser
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kraywinkel K, Buttmann-Schweiger N. Epidemiologie bösartiger Tumoren der Speiseröhre in Deutschland unter Berücksichtigung der histologischen Typen. Onkologe 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s00761-020-00735-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
ZusammenfassungIm vorliegenden Beitrag werden erstmals für Deutschland Inzidenz- und Überlebensraten für die beiden wesentlichen Formen des Speiseröhrenkarzinoms präsentiert, basierend auf den Daten der bevölkerungsbezogenen Krebsregister. Für beide Geschlechter ist seit 1999 ein Anstieg der altersstandardisierten Inzidenzraten der Adenokarzinome zu erkennen, während die Raten für Plattenepithelkarzinome (SCC) bei Frauen stagnieren und bei Männern zuletzt rückläufig sind. Zuletzt (2016) überwogen in Deutschland die Adenokarzinome mit 3340 Fällen gegenüber 3030 Plattenepithelkarzinomen. Knapp jede fünfte (Adeno-Ca.) bzw. jede dritte Neuerkrankung (SCC) trat bei Frauen auf. Die Verteilung der Tumorstadien war für beide Formen bei Frauen etwas günstiger als bei Männern, für das Plattenepithelkarzinom lagen auch die relativen Überlebensraten für Frauen höher. Auch unabhängig vom Tumorstadium wiesen Adenokarzinome eine etwas günstigere Prognose auf, dies galt vor allem im frühen Stadium (UICC I). Über 10 Jahre haben sich die relativen 5‑Jahres-Überlebensraten um 4,1 (Adeno-Ca.) bzw. 2,0 Prozentpunkte (SCC) verbessert.
Collapse
|
11
|
Hoffmann W, Latza U, Baumeister SE, Brünger M, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Hardt J, Hoffmann V, Karch A, Richter A, Schmidt CO, Schmidtmann I, Swart E, van den Berg N. Guidelines and recommendations for ensuring Good Epidemiological Practice (GEP): a guideline developed by the German Society for Epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 2019; 34:301-317. [PMID: 30830562 PMCID: PMC6447506 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-019-00500-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2018] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To revise the German guidelines and recommendations for ensuring Good Epidemiological Practice (GEP) that were developed in 1999 by the German Society for Epidemiology (DGEpi), evaluated and revised in 2004, supplemented in 2008, and updated in 2014. METHODS The executive board of the DGEpi tasked the third revision of the GEP. The revision was arrived as a result of a consensus-building process by a working group of the DGEpi in collaboration with other working groups of the DGEpi and with the German Association for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, the German Society of Social Medicine and Prevention (DGSMP), the German Region of the International Biometric Society (IBS-DR), the German Technology, Methods and Infrastructure for Networked Medical Research (TMF), and the German Network for Health Services Research (DNVF). The GEP also refers to related German Good Practice documents (e.g. Health Reporting, Cartographical Practice in the Healthcare System, Secondary Data Analysis). RESULTS The working group modified the 11 guidelines (after revision: 1 ethics, 2 research question, 3 study protocol and manual of operations, 4 data protection, 5 sample banks, 6 quality assurance, 7 data storage and documentation, 8 analysis of epidemiological data, 9 contractual framework, 10 interpretation and scientific publication, 11 communication and public health) and modified and supplemented the related recommendations. All participating scientific professional associations adopted the revised GEP. CONCLUSIONS The revised GEP are addressed to everyone involved in the planning, preparation, execution, analysis, and evaluation of epidemiological research, as well as research institutes and funding bodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Hoffmann
- Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, Institute for Community Medicine, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Ute Latza
- Unit "Prevention of Work-Related Disorders", Division "Work and Health", BAuA: Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Noeldnerstr. 40-42, 10317, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian E Baumeister
- Chair of Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, UNIKA-T Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
- Independent Research Group Clinical Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Martin Brünger
- Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Juliane Hardt
- Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
- Clinical Research Unit (CRU), Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Biometry und Clinical Epidemiology (iBikE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Verena Hoffmann
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - André Karch
- Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), Brunswick, Germany
| | - Adrian Richter
- Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | | | - Irene Schmidtmann
- Institute for Medical Biometrics, Epidemiology and Informatics, (IMBEI), University Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Enno Swart
- Institute for Social Medicine and Health Economics (ISMG), Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Neeltje van den Berg
- Unit "Prevention of Work-Related Disorders", Division "Work and Health", BAuA: Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Noeldnerstr. 40-42, 10317, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Poethko-Müller C, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Takla A. Corrigendum: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination of girls in Germany. Results of the cross-sectional KiGGS Wave 2 study and trends. J Health Monit 2019; 3:86. [PMID: 35377587 PMCID: PMC8852775 DOI: 10.25646/6804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2018-102.2.].
Collapse
|
14
|
Poethko-Müller C, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Takla A. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination of girls in Germany. Results of the cross-sectional KiGGS Wave 2 study and trends. J Health Monit 2018; 3:79-86. [PMID: 35586146 PMCID: PMC8852778 DOI: 10.17886/rki-gbe-2018-102.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Since 2007, the Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) has recommended that all girls receive vaccinations against the human papillomavirus (HPV) in order to reduce the disease burden of cervical cancer. Persistent infections with high-risk HPV subtypes increase a woman's risk of developing cancer. In the second wave of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS Wave 2, 2014-2017), 42% of 2,958 11- to 17-year-old girls reported that they had received at least one HPV vaccination, and 31.4% reported a full HPV vaccination. 45.3% of 14- to 17-year-old girls reported a complete series of HPV vaccinations. Compared to the figures reported in KiGGS Wave 1 five years ago, HPV vaccination coverage has therefore remained stable. A vaccination coverage below 50% in girls is too low to exploit the potential of HPV vaccination to reduce cervical cancer rates in Germany.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Poethko-Müller
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring,Corresponding author Dr Christina Poethko-Müller, Robert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, General-Pape-Str. 62–66, D-12101 Berlin, Germany, E-mail:
| | | | - Anja Takla
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Starker A, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Krause L, Barnes B, Kraywinkel K, Holmberg C. [Cancer screening in Germany: availability and participation]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2018; 61:1491-1499. [PMID: 30406892 DOI: 10.1007/s00103-018-2842-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In Germany, approximately 227,000 women and 249,000 men developed cancer in 2014, and nearly 223,000 patients died from the disease that year. Many cancers are curable or have a very good prognosis when they are diagnosed at an early stage. This is where the concept of early detection examinations comes into play.This article describes the current conditions of and participation in examinations for the early detection of cervical, breast, skin, prostate, and colon cancer as provided by Germany's statutory health services. Participation was derived from claims data from the statutory health insurance system as well as from Germany's mammography screening program (MSP). The survey "German Health Update" (GEDA 2014/2015-EHIS) served as an additional data source. According to the claims data and considering the intended intervals, participation quotas among insured persons who are entitled to participate lie between 16% (colonoscopy) and 48% (Pap test). In 2015, 51.5% of invited women participated in the MSP. The results according to self-reports of the GEDA survey lie in part substantially higher. The results according to the claims data, the MSP, as well as the self-reports suggest that a large part of the population utilizes the examinations. Colon and cervical cancer examinations will be expanded as organized and quality-assured early detection programs with regular invitations and information on benefits and risks. These efforts should contribute to reaching eligible people who have thus far not participated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Starker
- Abteilung für Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut, General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - Nina Buttmann-Schweiger
- Abteilung für Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut, General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Laura Krause
- Abteilung für Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut, General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Benjamin Barnes
- Abteilung für Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut, General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Klaus Kraywinkel
- Abteilung für Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Robert Koch-Institut, General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Christine Holmberg
- Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Starker A, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Kraywinkel K, Kuhnert R. The utilization of colonoscopy in Germany. J Health Monit 2017; 2:76-81. [PMID: 37168126 PMCID: PMC10165909 DOI: 10.17886/rki-gbe-2017-126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is one of the three most common cancers in German adults. There are several legally based examinations for the early detection of colorectal cancer. People aged 50 to 54 years can have a faecal blood test annually. From the age of 55, this test is offered every two years as part of cancer screening, or alternatively a preventive colonoscopy, which can be repeated after ten years if the findings are inconspicuous. However, colonoscopies are also carried out to clarify complaints or other diseases (curative colonoscopy). In the GEDA 2014/2015-EHIS study, the respondents provided the date of their last colonoscopy. No data was collected on the reason why this colonoscopy was performed. 57% of women and 61% of men aged 55 years or older reported that they had a colonoscopy within the last 10 years. New legal regulations envisage the expansion of colorectal cancer screening and its development into an organised, quality-assured early detection programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Starker
- Corresponding author Anne Starker, Robert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, General-Pape-Str. 62–66, D-12101 Berlin, Germany, E-mail:
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Buttmann-Schweiger N, Deleré Y, Klug SJ, Kraywinkel K. Cancer incidence in Germany attributable to human papillomavirus in 2013. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:682. [PMID: 29037233 PMCID: PMC5644114 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3678-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2016] [Accepted: 10/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is estimated that a total of 120,000 new cancer cases in men and in women in more developed countries could be avoided if exposure to HPV was prevented. We used the nationwide pool of German population-based cancer registry data to estimate the burden of HPV-attributable cancer in this population for the year 2013. METHODS Incident cases of cervical cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, oropharynx (OP), as well as of the vulva, vagina and penis were classified as potentially HPV-associated and identified from the nationwide cancer registry data-pool. We calculated the incidence and proportions of cancer with potentially HPV-associated morphologies. Estimation of the HPV-attributable incidence was based on prevalence-estimates of viral DNA in tumor cells in the respective sites, as provided from the international literature. RESULTS From the overall 15,936 incident cases of anogenital and OP cancers in 2013, 6239 female and 1358 male cancer cases were estimated to be attributable to HPV. The majority of HPV-attributable cases were contributed by cervical cancer (70.9% of female cancers) and oropharyngeal cancer (46.9% of male cancers). CONCLUSIONS Even if most HPV-attributable cases were contributed by cervical cancer, anogenital cancer at sites other than the cervix, and oropharyngeal cancer substantially contribute to the burden of HPV-associated cancer. Our nationwide cancer registry data-analyses provide the baseline for long-term population-based monitoring of vaccination-effects on cancer incidence in Germany.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Buttmann-Schweiger
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin, Germany. .,Cancer Epidemiology, University Cancer Center Dresden, University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. .,Robert Koch-Institut, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, German Centre for Cancer Registry Data, General Pape-Straße 62-68, 12101, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Yvonne Deleré
- General practitioner, Rudower Str. 60, 12524, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefanie J Klug
- Cancer Epidemiology, University Cancer Center Dresden, University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Epidemiology, Department for Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Klaus Kraywinkel
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Buttmann-Schweiger N, Barnes B, Woopen H, Braicu I, Pietzner K, Sehouli J. Retrospective study of long-term epithelial ovarian cancer survivors: clinical data and population-based cancer registry data. Das Gesundheitswesen 2017. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - B Barnes
- Robert Koch-Institut, Zentrum für Krebsregisterdatem (ZfKD), Berlin
| | - H Woopen
- Universitätsmedizin Berlin Charité, Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Zentrum für onkologische Chirurgie, Berlin
| | - I Braicu
- Universitätsmedizin Berlin Charité, Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Zentrum für onkologische Chirurgie, Berlin
| | - K Pietzner
- Universitätsmedizin Berlin Charité, Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Zentrum für onkologische Chirurgie, Berlin
| | - J Sehouli
- Universitätsmedizin Berlin Charité, Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Zentrum für onkologische Chirurgie, Berlin
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wienecke A, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Barnes B, Kraywinkel K. Trends in incident esophageal cancer by histologic subtypes in Germany 2003 – 2013. Das Gesundheitswesen 2017. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1605972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A Wienecke
- Robert Koch-Institut, Zentrum für Krebsregisterdaten, Berlin
| | | | - B Barnes
- Robert Koch-Institut, Zentrum für Krebsregisterdaten, Berlin
| | - K Kraywinkel
- Robert Koch-Institut, Zentrum für Krebsregisterdaten, Berlin
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kraywinkel K, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Benjamin B. Der Bericht zum Krebsgeschehen in Deutschland: Eine neue Form der Gesundheitsberichterstattung für Krebserkrankungen. Das Gesundheitswesen 2017. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1605773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- K Kraywinkel
- Robert Koch-Institut, Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Berlin
| | | | - B Benjamin
- Robert Koch-Institut, Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsmonitoring, Berlin
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Buttmann-Schweiger N, Grube M, Zeeb H. Open Access publizieren in den Gesundheitswissenschaften. Das Gesundheitswesen 2017. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1605885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - M Grube
- DGEpi-Initiative, besser forschen, Berlin
| | - H Zeeb
- DGEpi-Initiative, besser forschen, Berlin
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Scheidt-Nave C, Ziese T, Fuchs J, Plass D, Achoki T, Leach-Kemon K, Speyer P, Heisel WE, Gakidou E, Vos T, Forouzanfar MH, Schmidt JC, Stein CE, Scheidt-Nave C, von der Lippe E, Barnes B, Busch MA, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Fuchs J, Heidemann C, Kraywinkel K, Nowossadeck E, Ziese T, Buchholz U, an der Heiden M, Eckmanns T, Haller S, Forouzanfar MH, Plass D, Tobollik M, Kallweit D, Wintermeyer D, Scheidt-Nave C, Ziese T, Fuchs J, Plass D. Proceedings of the International Workshop ‘From Global Burden of Disease Studies to National Burden of Disease Surveillance'. BMC Proc 2016. [PMCID: PMC4965834 DOI: 10.1186/s12919-016-0005-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
I1 Introduction and aims of the workshop Christa Scheidt-Nave, Thomas Ziese, Judith Fuchs, Dietrich Plass S1 History, concept, and current results of GBD for Germany Tom Achoki, Katherine Leach-Kemon, Peter Speyer, William E. Heisel, Emmanuela Gakidou, Theo Vos S2 Methodology of the GBD 2013 Study–Mortality, Morbidity, Risk-Factors Mohammad Hossein Forouzanfar S3 National burden of disease surveillance examples of good practice: the case of Public Health England Jürgen C. Schmidt S4 Critical aspects of the burden of disease methodology and country-specific challenges Claudia E. Stein S5 Non-communicable disease surveillance in Germany – public health and data challenges Christa Scheidt-Nave, Elena von der Lippe, Benjamin Barnes, Markus Busch, Nina Buttmann-Schweiger, Judith Fuchs, Christin Heidemann, Klaus Kraywinkel, Enno Nowossadeck, Thomas Ziese S6 Different approaches in estimating the burden of communicable diseases using the examples of the healthcare associated infections and influenza Udo Buchholz, Matthias an der Heiden, Tim Eckmanns, Sebastian Haller S7 Behavioral and environmental attributable risk estimation Mohammad Hossein Forouzanfar S8 Environmental Burden of Disease (EBD) in Germany – past achievements and future perspectives Dietrich Plass, Myriam Tobollik, Dagmar Kallweit, Dirk Wintermeyer C1 Conclusions of the workshop Christa Scheidt-Nave, Thomas Ziese, Judith Fuchs, Dietrich Plass
Collapse
|
23
|
Buttmann-Schweiger N, Klug SJ, Luyten A, Holleczek B, Heitz F, du Bois A, Kraywinkel K. Incidence patterns and temporal trends of invasive nonmelanotic vulvar tumors in Germany 1999-2011. A population-based cancer registry analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0128073. [PMID: 26020540 PMCID: PMC4447423 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2014] [Accepted: 04/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Time trends on the incidence and characteristics of invasive vulvar cancer in Germany have so far been studied in few local population- and hospital based tumor registries. We aimed to provide an overview on recent developments of vulvar cancer in Germany, using population-based cancer registry data. METHODS We analyzed the data on vulvar cancer of eight population-based German cancer registries for the period 1999-2011. ICD-10 codes and ICD-O-3 morphology codes were used to select site and histologic types. The annual percentage change was calculated on age-adjusted incidence rates with a joinpoint regression model. RESULTS A total of 12,711 registered cases of invasive carcinoma of the vulva were included in the analyses, hereof were 12,205 of squamous cell origin. Age-standardized incidence rates of vulvar cancer annually increased by 6.7% (95% confidence limits: 5.6-7.9) from 1.7 per 100,000 women in 1999 to 3.6 per 100,000 women in 2011. An increase was observed among women of all ages, and especially between 30 and 69 years of age. CONCLUSION The annual incidence of invasive carcinoma of the vulva nearly doubled in the past decade in Germany, considerably exceeding the rates observed in other Western European countries. A combination of changes in risk factors, and documentation practice might have contributed to the observed substantial increase in vulvar cancer incidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Buttmann-Schweiger
- Robert Koch-Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, German Centre for Cancer Registry Data, Berlin, Germany
- Cancer Epidemiology, University Cancer Centre Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefanie J. Klug
- Cancer Epidemiology, University Cancer Centre Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alexander Luyten
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | | | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Klaus Kraywinkel
- Robert Koch-Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, German Centre for Cancer Registry Data, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Luyten A, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Luyten K, Mauritz C, Reinecke-Lüthge A, Pietralla M, Meijer CJLM, Petry KU. Early detection of CIN3 and cervical cancer during long-term follow-up using HPV/Pap smear co-testing and risk-adapted follow-up in a locally organised screening programme. Int J Cancer 2014; 135:1408-16. [PMID: 24519782 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2013] [Accepted: 01/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
We evaluated compliance with human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and risk-adapted patient pathways and monitored changes in high-grade cervical disease during long-term follow-up. Women aged >30 years attending routine screening for cervical cancer were managed according to results from first-round screening tests (cytology and high-risk HPV; Hybrid Capture 2). Between February 2006 and January 2011, 19,795 of 19,947 women agreed to participate, of whom 4,067 proceeded to a second screening round 5 years after recruitment. Predefined endpoints were compliance, grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer (CIN3+), new HPV infection, HPV persistence and abnormal smears in round 2. A total of 765 of 19,795 women (3.9%) in round 1 and 41 of 4,067 (1.0%) in round 2 were referred for colposcopy. Compliance rates with colposcopy were 93.1 and 92.7%, respectively, while histological assessment was performed in 680 of 712 (95.5%) and 36 of 38 (94.7%), respectively. CIN3+ rates were 172 of 19,795 (0.87%; 95% confidence intervals: 0.7-1.0) in round 1 and 2 of 4,064 (0.05%; 95% confidence intervals: 0.006-0.2) in round 2; the difference was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test, p<0.001). After 5 years, the incidence of new HPV infection was 124 of 3,906 (3.2%) and HPV persistence was observed in 22 of 161 (13.7%). Locally organised HPV/cytology co-testing is feasible and acceptable to women. Risk-adapted management rapidly detected a high rate of prevalent CIN3+, while the subsequent long-term risk of new high-grade cervical disease was surprisingly low. It remains unclear if this phenomenon is explained by CIN3 mostly occurring early in life or by modifying the natural course of HPV infection with colposcopy and histological assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Luyten
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|