Bundle branch reentry tachycardia: why is the HV interval often longer than in sinus rhythm? The critical role of anisotropic conduction

Upper turnaround point in a reentry circuit of the idiopathic left posterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia

BACKGROUND

The anatomic extent of the reentry circuit in idiopathic left posterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia (LPF-VT) is yet to be fully elucidated. We hypothesized that entrainment mapping could be used to delineate the reentry circuit of an LPF-VT, especially including the upper turnaround point.

METHODS

Twenty-three consecutive LPF-VT patients (mean age, 29 ± 9 years, 18 males) were included. We performed overdrive pacing with entrainment attempts at the left bundle branch (LBB) and the left His bundle (HB) region.

RESULTS

Overdrive pacing from the LBB region showed concealed fusion in all 23 patients (post-pacing interval [PPI], 322.1 ± 64.3 ms; tachycardia cycle length [TCL], 319.0 ± 61.6 ms; PPI-TCL, 3.1 ± 4.6 ms) with a long stimulus-to-QRS interval (287.9 ± 58.0 ms, approximately 90% of the TCL). Pacing from the same LBB region at a slightly faster pacing rate showed manifest fusion with antidromic conduction to the LBB and minimal in-and-out time to the LBB potential (PPI-TCL, 21.3 ± 13.7 ms). Overdrive pacing from the left HB region showed manifest fusion with a long PPI-TCL (53.9 ± 22.5 ms).

CONCLUSIONS

Our pacing study results suggest that the upper turnaround point in a reentry circuit of the LPF-VT may extend to the proximal His-Purkinje conduction system near the LBB region but below the left HB region. The LPF may constitute the retrograde limb of the reentry circuit.

Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia Involving the His-Purkinje System: Fascicular and Bundle Branch Reentrant Ventricular Tachycardia

The Purkinje system has been found to mediate several monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (VTs). These include fascicular VTs and bundle branch reentrant (BBR) VTs. Previous studies have revealed that VTs involving the His-Purkinje system are composed of multiple discrete subtypes that are best differentiated by their mechanism, drug effect, VT morphology, and successful ablation site. Recognition of the heterogeneity of these VTs and their unique characteristics should facilitate the appropriate diagnosis and therapy and help guide catheter ablation therapy. In this article, we focus on the latest updates of the mechanisms underlying left ventricle fascicular VTs and BBR-VTs as well as the latest catheter ablation techniques.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

[Bundle branch reentry VT : Diagnosis, mapping, and ablation]

Macroreentry in the His-Purkinje system can result in sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) termed bundle branch reentry VT. Bundle branch reentry is usually associated with His-Purkinje disease and depressed left ventricular function. In the case of typical bundle branch reentry, the right bundle is activated in the anterograde direction and ventricular depolarization begins at the distal end of the right bundle on the ventricular septum generating a typical left bundle branch block QRS morphology. However, atypical surface ECGs can also be found in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and involvement of the right ventricle complicating the diagnosis of bundle branch reentry VT. It is important to diagnose bundle branch reentry VT because patients with bundle branch reentry VT may suffer from a high rate of serial implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) interventions based on VT recurrences due to immediate reinitiation of the arrhythmia. Ablation of the right bundle branch easily cures bundle branch reentry VT and can prevent frequent ICD interventions. After ablation of bundle branch reentry VT, mortality remains high due to the severe left ventricular dysfunction in many patients, and the patients are candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D).

Mapping and ablation procedures for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia

INTRODUCTION

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) may occur in the presence or absence of structural heart disease. Given that the management of VT hinges on the presence of symptoms and risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD), the main treatment goals are elimination of symptoms (including frequent implantable cardioverter defibrillator [ICD] therapies) and prevention of SCD. Unfortunately, medical management is suboptimal in a significant proportion of patients. As such, ablative therapy plays a prominent role in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we will discuss various VT disorders that are encountered in patients with and without structural heart disease. Further, we will highlight salient features regarding mapping and ablation of the various VT syndromes. Finally, we will discuss what lies on the horizon for VT ablation. Expert commentary: Meticulous mapping should aim to find the region that is most likely to be successful and least likely to result in a complication. Although recognition of the various mechanisms of VT, familiarity with different methods to mapping and ablation, and awareness of potential limitations of current approaches is critical, a thorough understanding of the fundamental principles and nuances of each facet within EP is required to ensure optimal outcomes for our patients.

Monomorphic and polymorphic ventricular tachycardias arising from the His–Purkinje system: what do we know?

Monomorphic and polymorphic Purkinje-related ventricular tachycardias (VTs) may occur in patients with and without underlying structural heart disease. Monomorphic Purkinje-related VTs can be divided into different entities: verapamil-sensitive left fascicular VTs; bundle branch reentry tachycardias (BBRT); interfascicular VTs and focal Purkinje VTs. The most frequent fascicular VT is left posterior fascicular VT, characterized by macro-reentry within the posterior Purkinje network. However, the reentry may also be located in the anterior Purkinje network (left anterior fascicular VT). BBRT is also a macro-reentry-tachycardia, utilizing both the right and the left bundle branch as the antegrade and the retrograde limb and is often associated with pre-existing conduction disturbances in the specific conduction system. Interfascicular VT is rare and characterized by a macro-reentry within the left fascicles. BBRT and interfascicular VT may also occur in the same patient. In contrast to the mentioned macro-reentry mechanisms there are focal Purkinje-related VTs arising from the anterior or posterior Purkinje system. Focal Purkinje triggered premature ventricular contractions originating from the distal Purkinje arborization in patients without a structural heart disease, as well as in patients with known ischemic heart disease or an underlying channelopathy such as Brugada syndrome may induce polymorphic VTs. Catheter ablation is an effective treatment option for both monomorphic as well as polymorphic Purkinje-related VTs, often resulting in noninducibility and freedom from VT recurrence. A systematic analysis of the surface ECG and the intracardiac electrograms is essential for successful ablation of these heterogeneous and potentially curable VTs.