Population pharmacokinetic analysis of the major metabolites of capecitabine

Evaluation of bioequivalence and safety analysis of capecitabine tablets and Xeloda® under postprandial dosing conditions in Chinese patients with solid tumor

OBJECTIVES

To compare the pharmacokinetic and safety of the test group capecitabine tablets (0.5 g) and the reference group capecitabine tablets (0.5 g).

METHODS

This study was registered at www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn under the registration number CTR20220138. 48 subjects with solid tumor were recruited and randomized to receive either the test group or the reference group at a dose of 2 g per cycle for three cycles of the entire trial.

RESULTS

The point estimate of the geometric mean ratio of Cmax for the subject and reference groups was 1.0670, which was in the range of 80.00%-125.00%. And the upper limit of 95% confidence interval was -0.0450 < 0. The statistics of geometric mean ratio of AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ (test group/reference group) and their 90% confidence intervals were in the range of 80.00%-125.00%, thus the test group was bioequivalent to the reference group under the conditions of this postprandial test. There were no major or serious adverse events. Conclusion: The pharmacokinetic profiles of capecitabine under postprandial conditions were consistent between the two groups. The two groups were bioequivalent and had a similar favorable safety profile in Chinese patients with solid tumor.

Influence of age on pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites in older adults with cancer: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Capecitabine is an oral chemotherapy prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with unpredictable toxicity, especially in older adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of capecitabine and its metabolites in younger adults (< 70 years) and older adults (≥ 70 years) receiving capecitabine for solid cancer.

METHODS

Eligible participants receiving capecitabine had 2 venous samples collected on day 14 of cycle 1 and cycle 2 of their treatment. Capecitabine and metabolite concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. A Bayesian estimation approach was used to generate individual estimates of PK parameters for 5-FU. A linear mixed-effect analysis of variance (ANOVA) model was used to compare dose-normalised log-transformed PK parameters between age groups. Correlations were determined by linear regression and logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of the total 26 participants, 58% were male with a median age of 67 years (range, 37-85) with 54% aged < 70 years and 46% aged ≥ 70 years. Participants aged ≥ 70 years, compared to those aged < 70 years, had a greater 5-FU exposure based on area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 17% (90% CI 103-134%; 0.893 vs. 0.762 mg h/L) and 14% increase in maximal concentration, C_max (90% CI 82.1-159%; 0.343 vs. 0.300 mg/L). The 5-FU C_max was positively associated with time up and go (TUG) (Pearson's correlation 0.77, p = 0.01), but not other geriatric assessment domains or severe toxicity.

CONCLUSION

5-FU exposure was significantly increased in older adults compared to younger adults receiving equivalent doses of capecitabine, and is a possible cause for increased toxicity in older adults.

Impact of chronological age on efficacy and safety of fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab in older non-frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a combined analysis of individual data from two phase II studies of patients aged >75 years

OBJECTIVE

Many clinical trials for older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have been conducted, and fluoropyrimidine and bevacizumab are standard treatments. However, the relationship between age and the efficacy and safety of this treatment is unclear in older metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

METHODS

Individual data from two phase II studies on older (≥75 years), non-frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with uracil-tegafur/leucovorin or S-1 combined with bevacizumab were collected. Patient characteristics were evaluated with multiple regression analyses for survival outcomes, using the Cox proportional hazard model and linear regression analyses for the worst grade of adverse events.

RESULTS

We enrolled 102 patients with a median age of 80 years (range, 75-88 years). Of the 70 patients who died, seven (10%) died of causes unrelated to disease or treatment. The study treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 19 patients (18.6%), with 63% aged ≥85 years. The adverse event that most commonly resulted in treatment discontinuation was grade 2 fatigue (21%). Chronological age was not associated with progression-free survival (Hazard ratio, 1.03; P = 0.40) or overall survival (Hazard ratio, 1.02; P = 0.65). Age was weakly associated with non-hematologic adverse events (regression coefficient [R], 0.27; P = 0.007), especially fatigue (R, 0.23; P = 0.02) and nausea (R, 0.19; P = 0.06), but not with hematologic (R, 0.05; P = 0.43) or bevacizumab-related (R, -0.06; P = 0.56) adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab was age-independent in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer aged ≥75 years, and attention should be paid to non-hematologic adverse events as age increases.

Worse capecitabine treatment outcome in patients with a low skeletal muscle mass is not explained by altered pharmacokinetics

Background

A low skeletal muscle mass (SMM) has been associated with increased toxicity and shorter survival in cancer patients treated with capecitabine, an oral prodrug of 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU). Capecitabine and its metabolites are highly water‐soluble and, therefore, more likely to distribute to lean tissues. The pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with a low SMM could be changed, for example, by reaching higher maximum plasma concentrations. In this study, we aimed to examine whether the association between a low SMM and increased toxicity and shorter survival could be explained by altered PK of capecitabine and its metabolites.

Methods

Previously, a population PK model of capecitabine and metabolites in patients with solid tumors was developed. In our analysis, we included patients from this previous analysis for which evaluable abdominal computed tomography (CT)‐scans were available. SMM was measured on CT‐scans, by single slice evaluation at the third lumbar vertebra, using the Slice‐o‐Matic software. The previously developed population PK model was extended with SMM as a covariate, to assess the association between SMM and capecitabine and metabolite PK.

Results

PK and SMM data were available from 151 cancer patients with solid tumors. From the included patients, 55% had a low SMM. No relevant relationships were found between SMM and the PK parameters of capecitabine and, the active and toxic metabolite, 5‐FU. SMM only correlated with the PK of the, most hydrophilic, but inactive and non‐toxic, metabolite α‐fluoro‐β‐alanine (FBAL). Patients with a low SMM had a smaller apparent volume of distribution and lower apparent clearance of FBAL.

Conclusions

No alterations in PK of capecitabine and the active and toxic metabolite 5‐FU were observed in patients with a low SMM. Therefore, the previously identified increased toxicity and shorter survival in patients with a low SMM, could not be explained by changes in pharmacokinetic characteristics of capecitabine and metabolites.

Evaluation of ABC gene polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of capecitabine in colorectal patients: Implications for dosing recommendations

AIMS

The aims are to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of capecitabine (CAP) and its main metabolites after the oral administration of CAP in colorectal cancer patients with different polymorphisms of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) gene and a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model capable of accounting for the neutropenic effects, and to optimize the dosing strategy based on the polymorphisms of the ABC gene and/or the administration regimen as a single agent or in combination.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer were included, with 432 plasma levels of CAP, 5'-desoxi-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and 370 neutrophil observations. Capecitabine doses ranged from 1250 to 2500 mg/m² /24 h. Plasma measurements of CAP, 5'-DFUR and 5-FU were obtained at 1, 2 and 3 hours post administration. Neutrophil levels were measured between day 15 and day 24 post administration.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic model incorporates oxaliplatin as a covariate on absorption lag time, rs6720173 (ABCG5 gene) on clearance of 5'-DFUR (182% increase for mutated rs6720173) and rs2271862 (ABCA2 gene) on clearance of 5-FU (184% increase for mutated rs2271862). System- (Circ₀ = 3.54 × 10⁹ cells/mL, MTT = 204 hours and γ = 6.0 × 10^-2 ) and drug-related (slope [SLP] = 3.1 × 10^-2 mL/mg). Co-administration of oxaliplatin resulted in a 2.84-fold increase in SLP. The predicted exposure thresholds to G3/4 neutropenia in combination and monotherapy were 26 and 70 mg·h/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model characterized the time course of capecitabine and its metabolites in plasma. Dose recommendations of capecitabine in patients with mutated and wild allele for single nucleotide polymorphisms rs2271862 of ≤3000 and ≤2400 mg/m² /24 h in monotherapy and ≤1750 and ≤600 mg/m² /24 h in combination with oxaliplatin, respectively, have been proposed.

Pharmacokinetics of Capecitabine and Four Metabolites in a Heterogeneous Population of Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Analysis

Capecitabine is an oral prodrug of the anticancer drug 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU). The primary aim of this study was to develop a pharmacokinetic model for capecitabine and its metabolites, 5′‐deoxy‐5‐fluorocytidine (dFCR), 5′‐deoxy‐5‐fluorouridine (dFUR), 5‐FU, and fluoro‐β‐alanine (FBAL) using data from a heterogeneous population of cancer patients (n = 237) who participated in seven clinical studies. A four‐transit model adequately described capecitabine absorption. Capecitabine, dFCR, and FBAL pharmacokinetics were well described by two‐compartment models, and dFUR and 5‐FU were subject to flip‐flop pharmacokinetics. Partial and total gastrectomy were associated with a significantly faster capecitabine absorption resulting in higher capecitabine and metabolite peak concentrations. Patients who were heterozygous polymorphic for a genetic mutation encoding dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, the DPYD*2A mutation, demonstrated a 21.5% (relative standard error 11.2%) reduction in 5‐FU elimination. This comprehensive population model gives an extensive overview of capecitabine and metabolite pharmacokinetics in a large and heterogeneous population of cancer patients.

Meningeal metastasis of a malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: A case report and literature review

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma is a very rare tumor originating from the peritoneal serous mesothelium. Meningeal metastasis of malignant peritoneal is even more rare. Here, we reported a case of a 60-year-old female patient with a history of exposure to asbestos for 10 years who presented with massive peritoneal effusion followed by disorder of consciousness and symptoms of cranial nerve injury. The patient was diagnosed as peritoneal mesothelioma with meningeal metastasis through neurological symptoms, cytological finding of cerebrospinal fluid combined with cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The patient received systemic chemotherapy and total craniospinal irradiation. The follow up visits showed that the survival time of patient after diagnosis of meningeal metastasis from peritoneal mesothelioma was 5 months. To our knowledge, this is the first case of menigeal metastasis of peritoneal mesothelioma. We hope this particular case may be helpful in providing some experience to the treatment of peritoneal mesothelioma with meningeal metastasis.

Association Between Serum Folate Level and Toxicity of Capecitabine During Treatment for Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Folate level was proposed to be a predictor for fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. We conducted a prospective study to determine the association between serum and red-cell folate and capecitabine-related toxicity in patients with colorectal cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligibility criteria included diagnosis of colorectal cancers; eligible patients who were scheduled to undergo capecitabine monotherapy or capecitabine-oxaliplatin (CAPOX) for adjuvant or palliative purposes. Exclusion criteria included concomitant radiotherapy or chemotherapy other than capecitabine or CAPOX and creatinine clearance <30 mL/min. Fasting serum and red-cell folate were measured prior to chemotherapy. Capecitabine was administered at 2,500 mg/m² per day (monotherapy) or 2,000 mg/m² per day (CAPOX) for 14 days every 3 weeks. The toxicity of the first four cycles was documented by clinical investigators who were blinded to folate levels.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were recruited, of whom 126 were eligible; 40 patients had capecitabine alone, and 86 patients received CAPOX. The rates of grade 2 and grade 3 toxicity were 63.5% and 14.3%, respectively. Nausea and vomiting were the most common grade ≥2 adverse event (47.7%), followed by hand-foot syndrome (25.4%), diarrhea (23.1%), and neutropenia (22.3%). Combination with oxaliplatin (odds ratio [OR], 2.77; p = .043) and serum folate (OR, 10.33; p = .002) were independent predictors of grade ≥2 toxicity. Red-cell folate was not predictive of toxicity. For every 10 nmol/L increment in serum folate, the risk of grade ≥2 toxicity increased by 9%.

CONCLUSION

Serum folate level, but not red-cell folate, was associated with higher rate of grade ≥2 toxicity during capecitabine-based treatment. Excessive folate intake may be avoided before and during capecitabine-based chemotherapy.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This is the first prospective study to evaluate the association between serum folate level and capecitabine-related toxicity in patients with colon cancers. It shows that higher serum folate level is associated with increased risks of moderate to severe toxicity during capecitabine-based treatment. Excessive folate intake should be avoided before and during capecitabine-based chemotherapy.

A pediatric brain tumor consortium phase II trial of capecitabine rapidly disintegrating tablets with concomitant radiation therapy in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase II study of oral capecitabine rapidly disintegrating tablets given concurrently with radiation therapy (RT) to assess progression-free survival (PFS) in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Children 3-17 years with newly diagnosed DIPG were eligible. Capecitabine, 650 mg/m² /dose BID (maximum tolerated dose [MTD] in children with concurrent radiation), was administered for 9 weeks starting the first day of RT. Following a 2-week break, three courses of capecitabine, 1,250 mg/m² /dose BID for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest, were administered. As prospectively designed, 10 evaluable patients treated at the MTD on the phase I trial were included in the phase II analyses. The design was based on comparison of the PFS distribution to a contemporary historical control (n = 140) with 90% power to detect a 15% absolute improvement in the 1-year PFS with a type-1 error rate, α = 0.10.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were evaluable for the phase II objectives. Capecitabine and RT was well tolerated with low-grade palmar plantar erythrodyesthesia, increased alanine aminotransferase, cytopenias, and vomiting the most commonly reported toxicities. Findings were significant for earlier progression with 1-year PFS of 7.21% (SE = 3.47%) in the capecitabine-treated cohort versus 15.59% (SE = 3.05%) in the historical control (P = 0.007), but there was no difference for overall survival (OS) distributions (P = 0.30). Tumor enhancement at diagnosis was associated with shorter PFS and OS. Capecitabine was rapidly absorbed and converted to its metabolites.

CONCLUSION

Capecitabine did not improve the outcome for children with newly diagnosed DIPG.

Pharmacokinetics of Selected Anticancer Drugs in Elderly Cancer Patients: Focus on Breast Cancer

Background: Elderly patients receiving anticancer drugs may have an increased risk to develop treatment-related toxicities compared to their younger peers. However, a potential pharmacokinetic (PK) basis for this increased risk has not consistently been established yet. Therefore, the objective of this study was to systematically review the influence of age on the PK of anticancer agents frequently administered to elderly breast cancer patients. Methods: A literature search was performed using the PubMed electronic database, Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and available drug approval reviews, as published by EMA and FDA. Publications that describe age-related PK profiles of selected anticancer drugs against breast cancer, excluding endocrine compounds, were selected and included. Results: This review presents an overview of the available data that describe the influence of increasing age on the PK of selected anticancer drugs used for the treatment of breast cancer. Conclusions: Selected published data revealed differences in the effect and magnitude of increasing age on the PK of several anticancer drugs. There may be clinically-relevant, age-related PK differences for anthracyclines and platina agents. In the majority of cases, age is not a good surrogate marker for anticancer drug PK, and the physiological state of the individual patient may better be approached by looking at organ function, Charlson Comorbidity Score or geriatric functional assessment.

Pharmacokinetics and exposure-effect relationships of capecitabine in elderly patients with breast or colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

The aims of the present study were (1) to investigate the impact of great age on pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites and (2) to evaluate the exposure-effect relationship of capecitabine in elderly patients.

METHODS

Data collected from 20 elderly patients (75-92 years old) with breast or colorectal cancer who received oral capecitabine were analyzed. In order to study the old age effect on pharmacokinetics, data collected from two phase I studies involving 40 younger adults (<75 years old) with metastatic cancer who received oral capecitabine were added in the database. The population pharmacokinetic analysis was based on a four-compartment model describing the sequence of capecitabine and three of its metabolites.

RESULTS

The absorption rate constant was found lower in the oldest patient group (≥75 years) compared with the youngest group, and the constant rate elimination of the 5-fluorouracil metabolite was found decreased over time (i.e., after 2 consecutive weeks of capecitabine administration). This time effect was not found different between the two age groups. In elderly patients, the exposure-safety analysis showed, from the second cycle of chemotherapy, significantly higher median exposures of capecitabine and its metabolites (5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine and 5-fluorouracil) in patients who experienced hand-foot syndrome compared with patients who did not.

CONCLUSION

This study puts forward new arguments for the treatment of elderly cancer patients who could benefit from capecitabine chemotherapy with acceptable toxicity.

Evaluation of 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetic models and therapeutic drug monitoring in cancer patients

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) remains the cornerstone of all currently applied regimens for the treatment of patients with cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, breast, and head and neck. Unfortunately, a large variation in the clearance of 5-FU has been observed between patients, suggesting that some patients might receive nonoptimal 5-FU doses. However, therapeutic drug monitoring of 5-FU has been shown to result in reduced intra- and inter-individual variability in 5-FU plasma levels and pharmacokinetically guided dose adjustments of 5-FU-containing therapy results in a significantly improved efficacy and tolerability. To date, compartmental Michaelis-Menten elimination-based modeling has proven to be a sensitive and accurate tool for analyzing the pharmacokinetics of 5-FU and to identify patients with a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency. These Michaelis-Menten models also allow the use of a limited sampling strategy and offer the opportunity to predict a priori the 5-FU plasma concentrations in patients receiving adapted doses of 5-FU.

A retrospective observational study on the use of capecitabine in patients with severe renal impairment (GFR <30 mL/min) and end stage renal disease on hemodialysis

Capecitabine (Xeloda) is an orally administered precursor of 5'deoxy-5-fluorouridine, which is a preferentially activated to 5-fluorouracil in tumors. It is used in the treatment of colorectal, gastric, and breast cancers. Based on a single Phase II trial, which included a total of 4 patients with severe renal impairment (GFR <30 mL/min), the manufacturer issued a 'Dear Doctor' letter contraindicating the use of capecitabine in these patients since a high rate of grade 3 and 4 adverse events were observed and because these patients tolerated shorter treatment durations.(1) We retrospectively studied 12 patients with a GFR <30 mL/min, including 2 patients with end stage renal disease on hemodialysis, who received capecitabine for mean duration of 7.1 months (1-26 months). The mean serum creatinine at the time of initiation of the drug was 2.63 mg/dL (1.8-6.4 mg/dL) and mean GFR was 20.9 mL/min (8-29 mL/min). Two patients remained on capecitabine after they progressed to end stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis (HD) for an additional 17 and 6 months, respectively. Most patients reported grade 1 and 2 adverse effects (AE), 2 patients reported grade 3 diarrhea and one patient died while on treatment with capecitabine. The starting dose ranged from 250 to 1000 mg/m(2), given twice daily at variable intervals. Dose modifications, with reductions of up to 50% of the starting dose, were made following reports of AEs. Serum tumor marker levels and/or follow up imaging studies were available on 9 patients. Response to capecitabine was documented in 4 patients, stable disease in 2, and disease progression in 3. We conclude that, with close monitoring of their clinical and chemical data, and with dose modification based on reported AEs, capecitabine can be safely administered to patients with severe renal impairment, including patients on hemodialysis.

Capecitabine: have we got the dose right?

In the past 5-10 years there has been a growing trend for substituting conventional 5-fluorouracil with the oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, in chemotherapy regimens. This regimen change is based on evidence of the efficacy equivalence of these two drugs and the lack of an increase in overall toxic effects when capecitabine is used. Many investigators in different parts of the world have determined their own starting dose for capecitabine, usually based on their experience of toxic events within the population of patients they treat. This starting dose is usually between 1,000-1,250 mg/m(2), which is generally administered twice daily for 14 days followed by 7 days rest. This Review summarizes why there may indeed not be a universally applicable starting dose for capecitabine because of interpatient differences in basic physiology, pharmacogenomics and diet. This article also explores which of these factors contribute to the observed inter-regional geographical variation in capecitabine toxicity, and explains why even within a region various factors should prompt a clinician to modify the starting dose.

Recent developments in the clinical pharmacology of classical cytotoxic chemotherapy

Advances in analytical methods, imaging techniques and an increased understanding of the influence of pharmacogenetic factors have added to our knowledge of the pharmacology of many chemotherapeutic agents. Extending the use of these approaches to pharmacodynamic end-points, together with the application of population-based modelling techniques, offers the potential to develop truly individualized therapy in the future.

Weekday on-weekend off oral capecitabine: a phase I study of a continuous schedule better simulating protracted fluoropyrimidine therapy

BACKGROUND

Although protracted intravenous 5-fluorouracil is superior to bolus regimens in terms of tumour exposure to the drug during DNA synthesis as well as activity and safety, the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine is administered intermittently. In this phase I study, we investigated an alternative, dose-intense continuous regimen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Oral capecitabine was administered twice daily continuously with weekend breaks, in patients with advanced solid tumours refractory to standard therapy. Dose escalation proceeded from 1,331 to 2,510 mg/m(2) daily. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) consisted of any grade-3 or 4 adverse event except for alopecia and skin toxicity resolving within 7 days.

RESULTS

Twenty-five heavily pretreated patients participated in the study. No DLT occurred in the first four cohorts. Two out of four patients developed grade III diarrhoea in the fourth week of capecitabine at 2,510 mg/m(2) (DLT). The most common toxic episodes during all cycles of treatment were grade 1-2 fatigue, skin erythema, abdominal cramps, nausea, constipation and neutropenia. Disease regression was seen in three and stabilisation with clinical benefit in ten patients (clinical benefit response 54%). Pharmacokinetic studies of capecitabine and metabolites in four patients at 2,250 mg/m(2 )daily showed rapid absorption, short plasma half-lives with the exception of FBAL and absence of accumulation or conversion saturation during the course of therapy. At this dose, administered dose intensity in eight patients was 99.3% of the planned one.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekday on-weekend off capecitabine maximizes cytotoxic impact on tumour cells during S-phase by safely simulating protracted fluoropyrimidine therapy at a recommended dose (2,250 mg/m(2)) close to that of the intermittent schedule and clearly higher than the continuous one of 1,331 mg/m(2).

Capecitabine: effective oral fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy

Fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy, principally with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), has been a standard of care for a range of solid tumours for many years. Capecitabine, a precursor of 5-FU, is an oral fluoropyrimidine cytotoxic agent developed with the aim of providing a more effective, less toxic alternative to 5-FU, with the added advantage of oral administration. In clinical trials, capecitabine has proven to be an effective substitute for 5-FU in colorectal and breast cancer, and has become an accepted standard treatment in these tumours, both as a single agent and as a component of combination chemotherapy. It is also effective in a number of other solid tumours and as a radiosensitising agent. Capecitabine has significantly less serious toxicity than 5-FU when used alone or in combination with other cytotoxic agents. It has been shown to be resource saving in comparison with accepted standard comparator regimens in breast and colorectal cancer. Ongoing and future clinical trials will continue to examine, and are likely to expand, the role of capecitabine in the treatment of breast and colorectal cancer, as well as a number of other malignancies, both in the advanced palliative and adjuvant curative settings. This will involve the use of capecitabine as a single agent and increasingly in combination with other new anticancer agents.

Palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia due to docetaxel–capecitabine therapy is treated with vitamin E without dose reduction

Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) is a distinctive and relatively frequent toxic reaction related to some chemotherapeutic agents. Doxorubicin, cytarabine, docetaxel, fluorouracil, and capecitabine are the most frequently implicated agents. Recently, taxanes, especially docetaxel, have been widely used in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). A high percentage of PPE has been seen in patients undergoing this combination therapy. PPE seems to be dose dependent and both peak drug concentration and total cumulative dose determine its occurrence. Withdrawal or dose reduction of the implicated drug usually gives rise to amelioration of the symptoms. Supportive treatments such as topical wound care, elevation, and cold compresses may help to relieve the pain. Use of systemic corticosteroids, pyridoxine (vitamin B6), blood flow reduction, and, recently, topical 99% dimethyl-sulfoxide have been used with variable outcomes. Vitamin E treatment has not been published before, especially without dose reduction of docetaxel-capecitabine therapy. Here we present five MBC patients treated with docetaxel-capecitabine combination therapy in whom PPE was observed during the clinical follow-up period. In all patients grade 2-3 PPE was observed. Vitamin E therapy was started at 300 mg/day p.o. without dose reduction of therapy and after 1 week of treatment PPE began to disappear. We suggest that it could be of interest to consider vitamin E as a preventive drug when drugs with a strong association with PPE are going to be administered.

Pharmacokinetic Modelling of 5-FU Production from Capecitabine—A Population Study in 40 Adult Patients with Metastatic Cancer

AIMS

To model the biotransformation steps of 5-FU production from capecitabine and identify patient characteristics that may influence the drug disposition.

METHODS

Blood samples and demographic data were collected from two phase I studies in which adult patients received oral capecitabine for various malignancies. Capecitabine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (5'-DFCR), 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR) and 5-fluorouracile (5-FU) concentration-time data were analysed via a population approach using NONMEM.

RESULTS

Forty patients and 75 pharmacokinetic time-courses were available for analysis. Capecitabine pharmacokinetics was ascribed to a one compartment model from which 5'-DFCR, 5'-DFUR and 5-FU were sequentially produced. Capecitabine oral absorption was characterized by a rapid first order input (K(a)=2.1 +/- 0.3 hr(-1)) with a lag time (0.28 +/- 0.11 hr), but related inter-occasion (IOV) and inter-subject (ISV) variabilities for these parameters, 167% and 110%, indicated that this oral absorption was highly variable. The capecitabine CL (CL10 = 218+/- 18 L/hr, ISV = 18%) and 5'-DFUR elimination rate constant (K34 = 5.3 +/- 2.0 hr(-1), ISV = 25%) were influenced by total bilirubin (BILT). The elimination rate constant of plasma 5-FU (K40) was 66 +/- 24 hr(-1) (ISV = 34%). The final pharmacokinetic model was validated using 2000 bootstrap runs and provided non-parametric statistics of the parameters (median, 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles).

CONCLUSIONS

This study supported the possibility of modelling a complex sequential metabolic pathway which produces pharmacologicaly active compounds from a prodrug. Only BILT significantly influenced the pharmacokinetics but this effect was not considered as relevant for dosing adjustment.

Modelling and Simulation in the Development and use of Anti-Cancer Agents: An Underused Tool?

To help identify the role of modelling and simulation in the development of anti-cancer agents, their main advantages and the obstacles to their rational use, an expert meeting was organized by COST B15. This manuscript presents a synthesis of views expressed at that meeting and indicates future directions. The manuscript also shows some examples where modelling and simulation have proven to be of relevant value in the drug development process for anti-cancer agents.

Management of hand-foot syndrome in patients treated with capecitabine (Xeloda)

Comparative trials of capecitabine (Xeloda) versus 5-FU/LV in metastatic colorectal cancer have shown that hand-foot syndrome (HFS) was the only clinical adverse event occurring more frequently with capecitabine. Most patients with HFS present with dysesthesia, usually with a tingling sensation in the palms and soles of the hands and feet. This can progress in 3-4 days to burning pain plus well-defined symmetric swelling and erythema. The hands tend to be more commonly affected than the feet, and might even be the only area affected in some patients. HFS can interfere with the general activities of daily living, especially when blistering, moist desquamation, severe pain or ulceration occurs. While HFS is manageable, if ignored it can progress rapidly. However, dose interruption and reduction of capecitabine usually leads to a rapid reversal of signs and symptoms without long-term consequences. Nurses play a key role in educating patients how to recognise HFS, when to interrupt treatment and how to adjust the dose to maintain effective therapy with capecitabine over the long term. It is particularly important that patients and nurses are aware that dose interruption/reduction does not affect the overall antitumour efficacy of capecitabine.

Review article: chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a common, highly lethal disease that is rising in incidence. Chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been shown to prolong survival in advanced pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine improves major symptoms and survival outcomes compared with bolus 5-FU. Many novel small molecules are being widely and actively researched. These compounds are based on classical mechanisms of action as well as biological therapies targeting novel cellular survival pathways, and include fluoropyrimidines, nucleoside cytidine analogues, platinum analogues, topoisomerase-inhibitors, antimicrotubule agents, proteasome inhibitors, vitamin D analogues, arachidonic acid pathway inhibitors, histone deacytylator inhibitors, farnesyltransferase inhibitors and epidermal growth factor receptor therapies. Adjuvant chemotherapy has also demonstrated the best survival outcomes following resection compared to other adjuvant or neo-adjuvant strategies such as radiation-based treatments. These benefits are superimposed on the dramatic increase in resectability rates and reduction in post-operative mortality achieved by centralisation of treatment in high-volume speciality centres. Newer 'small-molecule' drugs as well as the latest 'large-molecule' biological agents hold considerable promise for the future. Real advances are anticipated over the next five years but are dependent on large randomised controlled trials for success.

Clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in new drug development: the capecitabine experience

Preclinical studies, along with Phase I, II, and III clinical trials demonstrate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and efficacy of a new drug under well controlled circumstances in relatively homogeneous populations. However, these types of studies generally do not answer important questions about variability in specific factors that predict pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PKPD) activity, in turn affecting safety and efficacy. Semi-physiological and clinical PKPD modeling and simulation offer the possibility of utilizing data obtained in the laboratory and the clinic to make accurate characterizations and predictions of PKPD activity in the target population, based on variability in predictive factors. Capecitabine is an orally administered pro-drug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), designed to exploit tissue-specific differences in metabolic enzyme activities in order to enhance efficacy and safety. It undergoes extensive metabolism in multiple physiologic compartments, and presents particular challenges for predicting pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic activity in humans. Clinical and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) and pharmacodynamic models were developed to characterize the activity of capecitabine and its metabolites, and the clinical consequences under varying physiological conditions such as creatinine clearance or activity of key metabolic enzymes. The results of the modeling investigations were consistent with capecitabine's rational design as a triple pro-drug of 5-FU. This paper reviews and discusses the PKPD and PBPK modeling approaches used in capecitabine development to provide a more thorough understanding of what the key predictors of its PBPK activity are, and how variability in these predictors may affect its PKPD, and ultimately, clinical outcomes.

Population pharmacokinetics and concentration-effect relationships of capecitabine metabolites in colorectal cancer patients

AIMS

To assess the relationship between systemic exposure to capecitabine metabolites and parameters of efficacy and safety in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer from two phase III studies.

METHODS

Concentration-effect analyses were based on data from 481 patients (248 males, 193 females; age range 27-86 years) in two phase III studies. Plasma concentration-time data for 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine (FBAL) were obtained from sparse blood samples collected within the time windows 0.5-1.5 h, 1.5-3.0 h, and 3.0-5.0 h after capecitabine administration (1250 mg m(-2)) on the first day of cycles 2 (day 22) and 4 (day 64), respectively. Systemic exposure based on plasma concentrations of capecitabine and its metabolites was determined using individual parameter estimates derived from a population pharmacokinetic model constructed for this purpose in NONMEM. Logistic regression analysis was conducted for selected safety parameters (all treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events, treatment-related grade 3-4 diarrhoea, grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (HFS) and grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinaemia) and for tumour response. Cox regression analysis was used for the analysis of time-to-event data (time to disease progression and duration of survival).

RESULTS

Statistically significant relationships between covariates and PK parameters were found as follows. A doubling of alkaline phosphatase activity was associated with a 11% decrease in 5-FU clearance and a 12% increase in its AUC. A 50% decrease in creatinine clearance was associated with a 35% decrease in FBAL clearance, a 53% increase in its AUC, a 24% decrease in its volume of distribution, and a 41% increase in its Cmax. A 30% increase in body surface was associated with a 24% increase in the volume of distribution of FBAL and a 19% decrease in its Cmax. There was a broad overlap in systemic drug exposure between patients regardless of the occurrence of treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events or response to treatment, leading to weak relationships between systemic exposure to capecitabine metabolites and the safety and efficacy parameters. Of 42 concentration-effect relationships investigated, only five achieved statistical significance. Thus, we obtained a positive association between the AUC of FBAL and grade 3-4 diarrhoea (P = 0.035), a positive association between the AUC of 5-FU and grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinaemia (P = 0.025), a negative association between the Cmax of FBAL and grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinaemia (P = 0.014), a negative association between the AUC of 5-FU (in plasma) and time to disease progression (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.626, P = 0.0056), and a positive association between the Cmax of 5'-DFUR and survival (HR = 0.938, P = 0.0048). Additionally, there were inconsistencies when concentration-effect relationships were compared across the two studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic exposure to capecitabine and its metabolites in plasma is poorly predictive of safety and efficacy. The present results have no clinical implications for the use of capecitabine and argue against the value of therapeutic drug monitoring for dosage adjustment.