The effect of raising gastric pH with ranitidine on the absorption and elimination of theophylline from a sustained-release theophylline tablet

A novel in situ gel formulation of ranitidine for oral sustained delivery

The main purpose of this study was to develop a novel, in situ gel system for sustained delivery of ranitidine hydrochloride. Ranitidine in situ gels at 0.2%, 0.5%, and 1.0% gellan gum concentration (w/v) were prepared, respectively, and characterized in terms of preparation, viscosity and in vitro release. The viscosity of the gellan gum formulations in solution increased with increasing concentrations of gellan gum. In vitro study showed that the release of ranitidine from these gels was characterized by an initial phase of high release (burst effect) and translated to the second phase of moderate release. Single photon emission computing tomography technique was used to evaluate the stomach residence time of gel containing ^99mTc tracer. The animal experiment suggested in situ gel had feasibility of forming gels in stomach and sustained the ranitidine release from the gels over the period of at least 8 h. In conclusion, the in situ gel system is a promising approach for the oral delivery of ranitidine for the therapeutic effects improvement.

Effect of meal and antisecretory agents on the pharmacokinetics of danoprevir/ritonavir in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of a low- and high-fat meal and co-administration of ranitidine or omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted danoprevir (DNVr).

METHODS

In this randomised, open-label, cross-over study, healthy subjects received a single dose of DNVr. In group 1, DNVr was administered while fasting or with a low-fat or high-fat meal. In group 2, DNVr was administered alone or with ranitidine 150 mg (single dose) or omeprazole 40 mg (multiple doses).

KEY FINDINGS

Group 1 (n = 16): relative to fasting conditions, food slightly prolonged absorption but did not alter the extent of absorption. DNV area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), and plasma concentration 12 h after administration (C12h) geometric mean ratios (GMR%) (90% confidence interval (CI)) with a low-fat meal were 92.3 (80.2-106), 61.8 (51.0-74.9) and 95.2 (80.9-112), versus fasting conditions, and with a high-fat meal 99.5 (86.4-115), 58.9 (48.5-71.6) and 101 (86.0-119). Group 2 (n = 13): ranitidine or omeprazole had no clinically significant effect on DNV pharmacokinetics. DNV AUC0-∞, Cmax and C12h GMR% (90% CI) with ranitidine: 81.9 (68.3-98.1), 104 (86.9-123) and 87.5 (69.3-111), and with omeprazole: 83.0 (67.4-102), 92.7 (70.6-122) and 93.3 (65.6-133).

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of clinically relevant effects of food, ranitidine or omeprazole on DNVr pharmacokinetics suggests that DNVr can be administered without regard to meals and in combination with H2 antagonists or proton pump inhibitors.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of theophylline to assess noncompliance in therapy

OBJECTIVE

To report a case showing patient noncompliance, supported by outcomes of pharmacokinetic analysis of theophylline as a surrogate drug.

CASE SUMMARY

A 45-year-old woman with severe hypertension was treated with a variety of oral antihypertensive drugs, but there was no improvement in her elevated blood pressure. Since we suspected that her intestinal drug absorption capacity was impaired, a theophylline absorption test was performed. When oral theophylline was given to the patient in tablet form, the apparent bioavailability was only 20%, which agreed with our hypothesis. However, the bioavailability of theophylline given in liquid form was almost 100%, and theophylline in tablet form was confirmed to be fully bioavailable when the test was performed under supervision by medical staff.

DISCUSSION

The almost complete bioavailability of oral theophylline indicated that there was no impairment in intestinal absorption capacity. The low bioavailability of theophylline observed after tablet administration in the first trial was apparently a result of noncompliance, because the staff did not supervise administration to ensure that tablets were swallowed. Thus, the low response to antihypertensive therapy was attributed to patient noncompliance in taking the drugs, despite her insistence to the contrary.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of theophylline was a novel approach to evaluating the absorbability of orally administered drugs in a patient suspected of poor compliance with therapy. A great difference in theophylline bioavailability between the supervised and unsupervised trials was strongly indicative of patient noncompliance. The possibility of impaired absorption was virtually ruled out.

Effect of increasing gastric pH with famotidine on the absorption and oral pharmacokinetics of the inotropic agent vesnarinone

The effect of famotidine, an H2 receptor blocker, on the oral absorption and pharmacokinetics of the novel agent vesnarinone was investigated after oral administration of 60 mg vesnarinone with and without pretreatment with intravenous famotidine. The single-blind, randomized, two-way crossover study was conducted in 12 volunteers, with a washout period of 7 days between the two treatments. A pH monitor was used to ensure that gastric pH of the subjects was < or = 3 in the absence of and > or = 5 in the presence of famotidine. A significant decrease in maximum concentration (Cmax) and increase in time to Cmax (tmax) was observed for vesnarinone during treatment with famotidine, whereas area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was similar for both treatments. The physicochemical properties of the drug support the above observations. Therefore, therapies that increase gastric pH will affect the rate but not the extent of absorption of vesnarinone or the safety or efficacy profile of vesnarinone.

The safety of ranitidine in over a decade of use

BACKGROUND

Ranitidine hydrochloride (Zantac) is one of the most extensively studied and widely used drugs of all time. This has provided an excellent opportunity to define its safety profile.

METHODS

Data from 189 controlled clinical trials in which more than 26,000 patients received daily doses of ranitidine for 4 weeks or more were reviewed. More than 80% of patients were treated with up to 300 mg ranitidine daily; the remaining patients received doses of up to 1200 mg daily. Eighty-seven trials were placebo controlled. Analyses of post-marketing surveillance and a database of all spontaneously reported adverse events were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall in the clinical trial programme adverse events were reported by 20% of those receiving ranitidine compared with 27% of those receiving placebo. The pattern of events was similar in all treatment groups with no evidence of dose-related toxicity in regimens encompassing an eightfold range of therapeutic doses. Similarly in a programme of studies designed to evaluate a dose of ranitidine of 75 mg for non-prescription (over-the-counter) use in the treatment of heartburn, ranitidine was not associated with an adverse event profile distinct from that of placebo. Analysis of spontaneously reported adverse event data allowed identification of rare idiosyncratic events.

CONCLUSIONS

Review of data from a large population of controlled clinical trials with analyses of postmarketing surveillance studies and spontaneously reported adverse events confirmed the excellent safety profile of ranitidine.