Genetic Counseling and Screening Issues in Familial Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Genetic Factors Involved in Cardiomyopathies and in Cancer

Cancer therapy-induced cardiomyopathy (CCM) manifests as left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and heart failure (HF). It is associated withparticular pharmacological agents and it is typically dose dependent, but significant individual variability has been observed. History of prior cardiac disease, abuse of toxics, cardiac overload conditions, age, and genetic predisposing factors modulate the degree of the cardiac reserve and the response to the injury. Genetic/familial cardiomyopathies (CMY) are increasingly recognized in general populations with an estimated prevalence of 1:250. Association between cardiac and oncologic diseases regarding genetics involves not only the toxicity process, but pathogenicity. Genetic variants in germinal cells that cause CMY (LMNA, RAS/MAPK) can increase susceptibility for certain types of cancer. The study of mutations found in cancer cells (somatic) has revealed the implication of genes commonly associated with the development of CMY. In particular, desmosomal mutations have been related to increased undifferentiation and invasiveness of cancer. In this article, the authors review the knowledge on the relevance of environmental and genetic background in CCM and give insights into the shared genetic role in the pathogenicity of the cancer process and development of CMY.

Return of genetic results in the familial dilated cardiomyopathy research project

The goal of the Familial Dilated Cardiomyopathy (FDC) Research Project, initiated in 1993, has been to identify and characterize FDC genetic cause. All participating individuals have been consented for the return of genetic results, an important but challenging undertaking. Since the inception of the Project we have enrolled 606 probands, and 269 of these had 1670 family members also enrolled. Each subject was evaluated for idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) and pedigrees were categorized as familial or sporadic. The coding regions of 14 genes were resequenced in 311 to 324 probands in five studies. Ninety-two probands were found to carry nonsynonymous rare variants absent in controls, and with Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment of 1988 (CLIA) compliant protocols, relevant genetic results were returned to these probands and their consented relatives by study genetic counselors and physicians in 353 letters. In 10 of the 51 families that received results >1 year ago, at least 23 individuals underwent CLIA confirmation testing for their family's rare variant. Return of genetic results has been successfully undertaken in the FDC Research Project. This report describes the methods utilized in the process of returning research results. We use this information as a springboard for providing guidance to other genetic research groups and proposing future directions in this arena.

Update 2011: clinical and genetic issues in familial dilated cardiomyopathy

A great deal of progress has recently been made in the discovery and understanding of the genetics of familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDC). A consensus has emerged that with a new diagnosis of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC), the clinical screening of first-degree family members will reveal FDC in at least 20% to 35% of those family members. Point mutations in 31 autosomal and 2 X-linked genes representing diverse gene ontogeny have been implicated in causing FDC but account for only 30% to 35% of genetic causes. Next-generation sequencing methods have dramatically decreased sequencing costs, making clinical genetic testing feasible for extensive panels of dilated cardiomyopathy genes. Next-generation sequencing also provides opportunities to discover additional genetic causes of FDC and IDC. Guidelines for evaluation and testing of FDC and IDC are now available, and when combined with FDC genetic testing and counseling, will bring FDC/IDC genetics to the forefront of cardiovascular genetic medicine.

Clinical and genetic issues in dilated cardiomyopathy: a review for genetics professionals

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), usually diagnosed as idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC), has been shown to have a familial basis in 20-35% of cases. Genetic studies in familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDC) have shown dramatic locus heterogeneity with mutations identified in >30 mostly autosomal genes showing primarily dominant transmission. Most mutations are private missense, nonsense or short insertion/deletions. Marked allelic heterogeneity is the rule. Although to date most DCM genetics fits into a Mendelian rare variant disease paradigm, this paradigm may be incomplete with only 30-35% of FDC genetic cause identified. Despite this incomplete knowledge, we predict that DCM genetics will become increasingly relevant for genetics and cardiovascular professionals. This is because DCM causes heart failure, a national epidemic, with considerable morbidity and mortality. The fact that early, even pre-symptomatic intervention can prevent or ameliorate DCM, coupled with more cost-effective genetic testing, will drive further progress in the field. Ongoing questions include: whether sporadic (IDC) disease has a genetic basis, and if so, how it differs from familial disease; which gene-specific or genetic pathways are most relevant; and whether other genetic mechanisms (e.g., DNA structural variants, epigenetics, mitochondrial mutations and others) are operative in DCM. We suggest that such new knowledge will lead to novel approaches to the prevention and treatment of DCM.

Clinical and genetic issues in dilated cardiomyopathy: a review for genetics professionals

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), usually diagnosed as idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC), has been shown to have a familial basis in 20-35% of cases. Genetic studies in familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDC) have shown dramatic locus heterogeneity with mutations identified in >30 mostly autosomal genes showing primarily dominant transmission. Most mutations are private missense, nonsense or short insertion/deletions. Marked allelic heterogeneity is the rule. Although to date most DCM genetics fits into a Mendelian rare variant disease paradigm, this paradigm may be incomplete with only 30-35% of FDC genetic cause identified. Despite this incomplete knowledge, we predict that DCM genetics will become increasingly relevant for genetics and cardiovascular professionals. This is because DCM causes heart failure, a national epidemic, with considerable morbidity and mortality. The fact that early, even pre-symptomatic intervention can prevent or ameliorate DCM, coupled with more cost-effective genetic testing, will drive further progress in the field. Ongoing questions include: whether sporadic (IDC) disease has a genetic basis, and if so, how it differs from familial disease; which gene-specific or genetic pathways are most relevant; and whether other genetic mechanisms (e.g., DNA structural variants, epigenetics, mitochondrial mutations and others) are operative in DCM. We suggest that such new knowledge will lead to novel approaches to the prevention and treatment of DCM.

Familial dilated cardiomyopathy secondary to dystrophin splice site mutation

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) encompasses a heterogeneous group of disorders, posing significant diagnostic challenges. Genetic etiologies underlie an important subset of DCM, including 20 genes and 5 X-linked disorders to date. We report a family with a rare dystrophin gene alteration, identified after evaluation of asymptomatic children whose extended family history included cardiomyopathy, premature cardiac death, or cardiac transplantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Record review, clinical evaluations, and DNA samples were obtained from members of a 5-generation pedigree with early onset DCM. Five of 6 affected males experienced death or cardiac transplant in their second or third decades. No affected individuals had skeletal muscle weakness before acute cardiac decompensation. Dystrophin gene analysis of an affected family member revealed sequence alteration at the conserved 5' splice site of exon 1 of the muscle-specific isoform of dystrophin (IVS1 +1 G>T) and co-segregated with cardiac disease in this family.

CONCLUSIONS

Young males presenting with apparent isolated cardiomyopathy or acute myocarditis may harbor dystrophin mutations without overt skeletal muscle pathology. The etiology of familial risk was not evident in this pedigree before retrospective cardiovascular genetics assessment, highlighting ongoing diagnostic challenges and limitations of standardized screening panels (which do not include dystrophin) in patients with "idiopathic" DCM.

Progress with genetic cardiomyopathies: screening, counseling, and testing in dilated, hypertrophic, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy

This review focuses on the genetic cardiomyopathies: principally dilated cardiomyopathy, with salient features of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy, regarding genetic etiology, genetic testing, and genetic counseling. Enormous progress has recently been made in identifying genetic causes for each cardiomyopathy, and key phenotype and genotype information is reviewed. Clinical genetic testing is rapidly emerging with a principal rationale of identifying at-risk asymptomatic or disease-free relatives. Knowledge of a disease-causing mutation can guide clinical surveillance for disease onset, thereby enhancing preventive and treatment interventions. Genetic counseling is also indicated for patients and their family members regarding the symptoms of their cardiomyopathy, its inheritance pattern, family screening recommendations, and genetic testing options and possible results.

Genetic evaluation of cardiomyopathy--a Heart Failure Society of America practice guideline

Substantial progress has been made recently in understanding the genetic basis of cardiomyopathy. Cardiomyopathies with known genetic cause include hypertrophic (HCM), dilated (DCM), restrictive (RCM), arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) and left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC). HCM, DCM, and RCM have been recognized as distinct clinical entities for decades, whereas ARVD/C and LVNC are relative newcomers to the field. Hence the clinical and genetic knowledge for each cardiomyopathy varies, as do the recommendations and strength of evidence.

Genetic testing and genetic counseling in cardiovascular genetic medicine: overview and preliminary recommendations

In this emerging era of cardiovascular genetic medicine, increasing responsibility will be placed on cardiovascular practitioners to be aware of the latest clinical genetic testing methods and the knowledge base needed to interpret genetic test results. Some cardiovascular specialists will develop the expertise within the field to order genetic testing and interpret results, while other practitioners will refer patients to centers of excellence in cardiovascular genetic medicine. A previous article in the Cardiovascular Genetic Medicine: Clinical Perspectives and Future Applications series(1) highlighted an increasing recognition of the cardiomyopathies (hypertrophic [HCM], dilated [DCM], arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia [ARVD]) and channelopathies (long QT syndrome [LQTS] and others) as genetic diseases, and focused on the importance of a targeted family history as a critical part of patient evaluation. The goal of this article, second in the series, is to provide a general framework for understanding the principles of genetic testing and genetic counseling. We review the growing number of genetic tests currently available to cardiac specialists, the selection of an appropriate test, and the numerous genetic counseling issues raised by the testing process. We also provide our preliminary recommendations for genetic testing in cardiovascular genetic medicine.

Lamin A/C truncation in dilated cardiomyopathy with conduction disease

BACKGROUND

Mutations in the gene encoding the nuclear membrane protein lamin A/C have been associated with at least 7 distinct diseases including autosomal dominant dilated cardiomyopathy with conduction system disease, autosomal dominant and recessive Emery Dreifuss Muscular Dystrophy, limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 1B, autosomal recessive type 2 Charcot Marie Tooth, mandibuloacral dysplasia, familial partial lipodystrophy and Hutchinson-Gilford progeria.

METHODS

We used mutation detection to evaluate the lamin A/C gene in a 45 year-old woman with familial dilated cardiomyopathy and conduction system disease whose family has been well characterized for this phenotype 1.

RESULTS

DNA from the proband was analyzed, and a novel 2 base-pair deletion c.908_909delCT in LMNA was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Mutations in the gene encoding lamin A/C can lead to significant cardiac conduction system disease that can be successfully treated with pacemakers and/or defibrillators. Genetic screening can help assess risk for arrhythmia and need for device implantation.

A novel lamin A/C mutation in a family with dilated cardiomyopathy, prominent conduction system disease, and need for permanent pacemaker implantation

BACKGROUND

The LMNA gene, which encodes the nuclear envelope protein lamin A/C, is thought to be the most common of 8 autosomal disease genes implicated in familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDC). Each family reported to date has a unique mutation and variable degrees of cardiac conduction system, dilated cardiomyopathy, or skeletal muscle disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Coding regions of the LMNA gene were screened in 12 biological members of a family with dilated cardiomyopathy and conduction system disease. A novel missense mutation (Leu215Pro) in exon 4 was identified in 8 subjects. Disease was manifested as brady- and tachyarrhythmias, often necessitating permanent pacemaker implantation, and later onset of dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure. No features of skeletal muscle disease were noted. The high percentage of affected individuals who needed pacemaker therapy (88%) was a unique characteristic of this family compared with other FDC families with LMNA mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful examination of clinical data in families with FDC and LMNA mutations may reveal subtle genotype-phenotype correlations. Knowledge of such correlations may help to further define the mechanisms of disease in LMNA-associated FDC and can assist in the monitoring of disease for at-risk family members.

Periodic rescreening is indicated for family members at risk of developing familial dilated cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the role of clinical rescreening of family members at risk for familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDC).

BACKGROUND

Familial dilated cardiomyopathy is a genetic cardiomyopathy that usually is transmitted in an autosomal dominant pattern and may underlie from one-quarter to one-half of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) diagnoses. Thus, FDC may present with advanced heart failure (HF) or sudden cardiac death (SCD). Because FDC may respond to medical intervention, we have previously recommended that screening of first-degree relatives (parents, siblings, children) of patients diagnosed with IDC be undertaken to rule out FDC, and that with a diagnosis of FDC in the kindred, unaffected but at-risk family members be rescreened every three to five years. METHODS; Follow-up screening (history, examination, electrocardiogram, echocardiography) of a large family with FDC was performed six years after initial screening. Of 68 family members who underwent rescreening, two (one with left ventricular enlargement only, one with a left bundle branch block) presented with advanced HF and SCD, respectively. Two additional subjects, asymptomatic at initial screening, were also affected with FDC at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable vigilance for disease presentation and progression is indicated in at-risk members of a kindred with FDC, especially those with incipient FDC.

Cardiac troponin T lysine 210 deletion in a family with dilated cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

The gene for cardiac troponin T (TNNT2) is 1 of 7 autosomal disease genes implicated in familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDC). Identical deletions in exon 13 of TNNT2 have been reported in 2 families with FDC, but little is known about the frequency of this deletion among patients with FDC and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) and the associated phenotype.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Exon 13 of the cardiac troponin T gene was sequenced in 61 subjects with FDC and 53 subjects with IDC. A 3-base pair deletion (DeltaLys210), identified in 1 family with at least 7 clinically affected family members, is reported. Age of disease onset and disease severity varied widely among affected individuals; phenotypic findings included dilated cardiomyopathy, sudden cardiac death, conduction system disease including atrial fibrillation and atrioventricular block, and heart failure. Sudden-onset, rapidly progressive disease was observed in younger individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac troponin T exon 13 lysine deletions can cause FDC of varying severity and are an important but uncommon cause of FDC.

Novel lamin A/C mutations in two families with dilated cardiomyopathy and conduction system disease

BACKGROUND

The LMNA gene, one of 6 autosomal disease genes implicated in familial dilated cardiomyopathy, encodes lamins A and C, alternatively spliced nuclear envelope proteins. Mutations in lamin A/C cause 4 diseases: Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy, limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 1B, Dunnigan-type familial partial lipodystrophy, and dilated cardiomyopathy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two 4-generation white families with autosomal dominant familial dilated cardiomyopathy and conduction system disease were found to have novel mutations in the rod segment of lamin A/C. In family A a missense mutation (nucleotide G607A, amino acid E203K) was identified in 14 adult subjects; disease was manifest as progressive conduction disease in the fourth and fifth decades. Death was caused by heart failure. In family B a nonsense mutation (nucleotide C673T, amino acid R225X) was identified in 10 adult subjects; disease was also manifest as progressive conduction disease but with earlier onset (third and fourth decades), ventricular dysrhythmias, left ventricular enlargement, and systolic dysfunction. Death was caused by heart failure and sudden cardiac death. Skeletal muscle disease was not observed in either family.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel rod segment mutations in lamin A/C cause variable conduction system disease and dilated cardiomyopathy without skeletal myopathy.