A research induction group for clients entering a mental health research project: a replication study

Algorithm-Driven Substance Use Disorder Treatment for Inner-City Clients With Serious Mental Illness and Multiple Impairments

ABSTRACT

Mental health clients with serious mental illness in urban settings experience multiple chronic stresses related to poverty, unemployment, discrimination, homelessness, incarceration, hospitalization, posttraumatic stress disorder, pain syndromes, traumatic brain injury, and other problems. Substance use disorder exacerbates these difficulties. This study examined the efficacy of algorithm-driven substance use disorder treatments for 305 inner-city mental health clients with multiple challenges. Researchers assessed substance use quarterly using a combination of standardized self-reports and case manager ratings. Of the 305 multiply impaired clients who began treatment, 200 (66%) completed 2 years of treatment. One fourth (n = 53) of the completers were responders who developed abstinence and improved community function; one half (n = 97) were partial responders, who reduced substance use but did not become abstinent; and one fourth (n = 50) were nonresponders. Evidence-based interventions for substance use disorder can be effective for multiply impaired, inner-city clients, but numerous complications may hinder recovery.

Effectiveness of Psychiatric Rehabilitation Approaches for Employment of People with Severe Mental Illness

The authors review studies of (a) traditional psychiatric rehabilitation (including clubhouse programs and approaches offering an array of employment options) and (b) supported employment approaches for helping people with severe mental illness gain and maintain competitive employment. Based on the results of this review, the authors conclude that the effectiveness of traditional psychiatric rehabilitation in helping people gain competitive employment cannot be conclusively determined at this point. On the other hand, research on the effectiveness of supported employment was consistently positive. The authors recommend that further research be conducted on model definition, intermediate vocational options, interaction between client characteristics and program models, and long-term outcomes.

Who benefits from supported employment: a meta-analytic study

AIMS

This meta-analysis sought to identify which subgroups of clients with severe mental illness (SMI) benefited from evidence-based supported employment.

METHODS

We used meta-analysis to pool the samples from 4 randomized controlled trials comparing the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model of supported employment to well-regarded vocational approaches using stepwise models and brokered services. Meta-analysis was used to determine the magnitude of effects for IPS/control group differences within specific client subgroups (defined by 2 work history, 7 sociodemographic, and 8 clinical variables) on 3 competitive employment outcomes (obtaining a job, total weeks worked, and job tenure).

RESULTS

The findings strongly favored IPS, with large effect sizes across all outcomes: 0.96 for job acquisition, 0.79 for total weeks worked, and 0.74 for job tenure. Overall, 90 (77%) of the 117 effect sizes calculated for the 39 subgroups exceeded 0.70, and all 117 favored IPS.

CONCLUSIONS

IPS produces better competitive employment outcomes for persons with SMI than alternative vocational programs regardless of background demographic, clinical, and employment characteristics.

Does competitive employment improve nonvocational outcomes for people with severe mental illness?

The authors examined the cumulative effects of work on symptoms, quality of life, and self-esteem for 149 unemployed clients with severe mental illness receiving vocational rehabilitation. Nonvocational measures were assessed at 6-month intervals throughout the 18-month study period, and vocational activity was tracked continuously. On the basis of their predominant work activity over the study period, participants were classified into 4 groups: competitive work, sheltered work, minimal work, and no work. The groups did not differ at baseline on any of the nonvocational measures. Using mixed effects regression analysis to examine rates of change over time, the authors found that the competitive work group showed higher rates of improvement in symptoms; in satisfaction with vocational services, leisure, and finances; and in self-esteem than did participants in a combined minimal work-no work group. The sheltered work group showed no such advantage.

Work interest as a predictor of competitive employment: policy implications for psychiatric rehabilitation

Consumers with serious mental illness (N = 166) enrolling in two community-based mental health programs, a vocational Program of Assertive Community Treatment and a clubhouse certified by the International Center for Clubhouse Development (ICCD), were asked about their interest in work. About one third of the new enrollees expressed no interest in working. Equivalent supported employment services were then offered to all participants in each program. Stated interest in work and receipt of vocational services were statistically significant predictors of whether a person would work and how long it would take to get a job. Two thirds of those interested in work and half of those with no initial interest obtained a competitive job if they received at least one hour of vocational service. Once employed, these two groups held comparable jobs for the same length of time. These findings demonstrate the importance of making vocational services continuously available to all people with serious mental illness, and the viability of integrating these services into routine mental health care.