1
|
Ajithkumar T, Avanzo M, Yorke E, Tsang DS, Milano MT, Olch AJ, Merchant TE, Dieckmann K, Mahajan A, Fuji H, Paulino AC, Timmermann B, Marks LB, Bentzen SM, Jackson A, Constine LS. Brain and Brain Stem Necrosis After Reirradiation for Recurrent Childhood Primary Central Nervous System Tumors: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:655-668. [PMID: 38300187 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Reirradiation is increasingly used in children and adolescents/young adults (AYA) with recurrent primary central nervous system tumors. The Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) reirradiation task force aimed to quantify risks of brain and brain stem necrosis after reirradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic literature search using the PubMed and Cochrane databases for peer-reviewed articles from 1975 to 2021 identified 92 studies on reirradiation for recurrent tumors in children/AYA. Seventeen studies representing 449 patients who reported brain and brain stem necrosis after reirradiation contained sufficient data for analysis. While all 17 studies described techniques and doses used for reirradiation, they lacked essential details on clinically significant dose-volume metrics necessary for dose-response modeling on late effects. We, therefore, estimated incidences of necrosis with an exact 95% CI and qualitatively described data. Results from multiple studies were pooled by taking the weighted average of the reported crude rates from individual studies. RESULTS Treated cancers included ependymoma (n = 279 patients; 7 studies), medulloblastoma (n = 98 patients; 6 studies), any CNS tumors (n = 62 patients; 3 studies), and supratentorial high-grade gliomas (n = 10 patients; 1 study). The median interval between initial and reirradiation was 2.3 years (range, 1.2-4.75 years). The median cumulative prescription dose in equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD22; assuming α/β value = 2 Gy) was 103.8 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy). Among 449 reirradiated children/AYA, 22 (4.9%; 95% CI, 3.1%-7.3%) developed brain necrosis and 14 (3.1%; 95% CI, 1.7%-5.2%) developed brain stem necrosis with a weighted median follow-up of 1.6 years (range, 0.5-7.4 years). The median cumulative prescription EQD22 was 111.4 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy) for development of any necrosis, 107.7 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy) for brain necrosis, and 112.1 Gy (range, 100.2-117 Gy) for brain stem necrosis. The median latent period between reirradiation and the development of necrosis was 5.7 months (range, 4.3-24 months). Though there were more events among children/AYA undergoing hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated reirradiation, the differences were not statistically significant (P = .46). CONCLUSIONS Existing reports suggest that in children/AYA with recurrent brain tumors, reirradiation with a total EQD22 of about 112 Gy is associated with an approximate 5% to 7% incidence of brain/brain stem necrosis after a median follow-up of 1.6 years (with the initial course of radiation therapy being given with conventional prescription doses of ≤2 Gy per fraction and the second course with variable fractionations). We recommend a uniform approach for reporting dosimetric endpoints to derive robust predictive models of late toxicities following reirradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thankamma Ajithkumar
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Michele Avanzo
- Division of Medical Physics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico Aviano IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Derek S Tsang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael T Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Arthur J Olch
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Thomas E Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Karin Dieckmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Hiroshi Fuji
- National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Lawrence B Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Soren M Bentzen
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Radiation Oncology, and University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Adolph JE, Fleischhack G, Tschirner S, Rink L, Dittes C, Mikasch R, Dammann P, Mynarek M, Obrecht-Sturm D, Rutkowski S, Bison B, Warmuth-Metz M, Pietsch T, Pfister SM, Pajtler KW, Milde T, Kortmann RD, Dietzsch S, Timmermann B, Tippelt S. Radiotherapy for Recurrent Medulloblastoma in Children and Adolescents: Survival after Re-Irradiation and First-Time Irradiation. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1955. [PMID: 38893076 PMCID: PMC11171022 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16111955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Revised: 05/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy (RT) involving craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is important in the initial treatment of medulloblastoma. At recurrence, the re-irradiation options are limited and associated with severe side-effects. METHODS For pre-irradiated patients, patients with re-irradiation (RT2) were matched by sex, histology, time to recurrence, disease status and treatment at recurrence to patients without RT2. RESULTS A total of 42 pre-irradiated patients with RT2 were matched to 42 pre-irradiated controls without RT2. RT2 improved the median PFS [21.0 (CI: 15.7-28.7) vs. 12.0 (CI: 8.1-21.0) months] and OS [31.5 (CI: 27.6-64.8) vs. 20.0 (CI: 14.0-36.7) months]. Concerning long-term survival after ten years, RT2 only lead to small improvements in OS [8% (CI: 1.4-45.3) vs. 0%]. RT2 improved survival most without (re)-resection [PFS: 17.5 (CI: 9.7-41.5) vs. 8.0 (CI: 6.6-12.2)/OS: 31.5 (CI: 27.6-NA) vs. 13.3 (CI: 8.1-20.1) months]. In the RT-naïve patients, CSI at recurrence improved their median PFS [25.0 (CI: 16.8-60.6) vs. 6.6 (CI: 1.5-NA) months] and OS [40.2 (CI: 18.7-NA) vs. 12.4 (CI: 4.4-NA) months]. CONCLUSIONS RT2 could improve the median survival in a matched cohort but offered little benefit regarding long-term survival. In RT-naïve patients, CSI greatly improved their median and long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas E. Adolph
- Department of Pediatrics III, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (CTNBS), University Hospital of Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany; (G.F.); (S.T.); (L.R.); (C.D.); (S.T.)
| | - Gudrun Fleischhack
- Department of Pediatrics III, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (CTNBS), University Hospital of Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany; (G.F.); (S.T.); (L.R.); (C.D.); (S.T.)
| | - Sebastian Tschirner
- Department of Pediatrics III, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (CTNBS), University Hospital of Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany; (G.F.); (S.T.); (L.R.); (C.D.); (S.T.)
| | - Lydia Rink
- Department of Pediatrics III, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (CTNBS), University Hospital of Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany; (G.F.); (S.T.); (L.R.); (C.D.); (S.T.)
| | - Christine Dittes
- Department of Pediatrics III, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (CTNBS), University Hospital of Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany; (G.F.); (S.T.); (L.R.); (C.D.); (S.T.)
| | - Ruth Mikasch
- Department of Pediatrics III, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (CTNBS), University Hospital of Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany; (G.F.); (S.T.); (L.R.); (C.D.); (S.T.)
| | - Philipp Dammann
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany;
| | - Martin Mynarek
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Center for Obstetrics and Pediatrics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (M.M.); (D.O.-S.); (S.R.)
- Mildred Scheel Cancer Career Center HaTriCS4, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Denise Obrecht-Sturm
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Center for Obstetrics and Pediatrics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (M.M.); (D.O.-S.); (S.R.)
| | - Stefan Rutkowski
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Center for Obstetrics and Pediatrics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (M.M.); (D.O.-S.); (S.R.)
| | - Brigitte Bison
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany;
| | - Monika Warmuth-Metz
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany;
| | - Torsten Pietsch
- Institute of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, University Hospital of Bonn, 53105 Bonn, Germany;
| | - Stefan M. Pfister
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (S.M.P.); (K.W.P.)
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- Hopp Children’s Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristian W. Pajtler
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (S.M.P.); (K.W.P.)
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- Hopp Children’s Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Till Milde
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- Hopp Children’s Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit (CCU) Pediatric Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rolf-Dieter Kortmann
- Department of Radio-Oncology, University Leipzig, 04129 Leipzig, Germany; (R.-D.K.); (S.D.)
| | - Stefan Dietzsch
- Department of Radio-Oncology, University Leipzig, 04129 Leipzig, Germany; (R.-D.K.); (S.D.)
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany;
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany;
| | - Stephan Tippelt
- Department of Pediatrics III, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (CTNBS), University Hospital of Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany; (G.F.); (S.T.); (L.R.); (C.D.); (S.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang E, Gutkin PM, Oh J, Pollom E, Soltys SG, Grant GA, Prolo LM, Chang S, Li G, Fisher PG, Partap S, Campen CJ, Gibbs IC, Hiniker SM. Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent pediatric brain tumors: clinical outcomes and toxicity. Neurosurg Focus 2022; 53:E2. [DOI: 10.3171/2022.8.focus22361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Recurrence of brain tumors in children after the initial course of treatment remains a problem. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of reirradiation using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with recurrent pediatric primary brain tumors.
METHODS
This IRB-approved retrospective review included pediatric patients with recurrent primary brain tumors treated at Stanford University from 2000 to 2019 using frameless SRS. Time to local failure (LF) and distant intracranial failure (DIF) were measured from the date of SRS and analyzed using competing risk analysis. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS
In total, 37 patients aged 2–24 years (median age 11 years at recurrence) were treated for 48 intracranial tumors. Ependymoma (38%) and medulloblastoma (22%) were the most common tumor types. The median (range) single fraction equivalent dose of SRS was 16.4 (12–24) Gy. The median (range) follow-up time was 22.9 (1.5–190) months. The median OS of all patients was 36.8 months. Eight of 40 (20%) lesions with follow-up imaging locally recurred. The 2-year cumulative incidence of LF after reirradiation with SRS was 12.8% (95% CI 4.6%–25.4%). The 2-year cumulative incidence of DIF was 25.3% (95% CI 12.9%–39.8%). The median PFS was 18 months (95% CI 8.9–44). Five (10.4%) patients developed toxicities potentially attributed to SRS, including cognitive effects and necrosis.
CONCLUSIONS
Reirradiation using SRS for recurrent pediatric brain tumors appears safe with good local control. Innovations that improve overall disease control should continue because survival outcomes after relapse remain poor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elyn Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford
| | | | - Justin Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford
| | - Erqi Pollom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford
| | - Scott G. Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford
| | - Gerald A. Grant
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford; and
| | - Laura M. Prolo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford; and
| | - Steven Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford; and
| | - Gordon Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford; and
| | - Paul G. Fisher
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Sonia Partap
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Cynthia J. Campen
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Iris C. Gibbs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hill RM, Plasschaert SLA, Timmermann B, Dufour C, Aquilina K, Avula S, Donovan L, Lequin M, Pietsch T, Thomale U, Tippelt S, Wesseling P, Rutkowski S, Clifford SC, Pfister SM, Bailey S, Fleischhack G. Relapsed Medulloblastoma in Pre-Irradiated Patients: Current Practice for Diagnostics and Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:126. [PMID: 35008290 PMCID: PMC8750207 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Relapsed medulloblastoma (rMB) accounts for a considerable, and disproportionate amount of childhood cancer deaths. Recent advances have gone someway to characterising disease biology at relapse including second malignancies that often cannot be distinguished from relapse on imaging alone. Furthermore, there are now multiple international early-phase trials exploring drug-target matches across a range of high-risk/relapsed paediatric tumours. Despite these advances, treatment at relapse in pre-irradiated patients is typically non-curative and focuses on providing life-prolonging and symptom-modifying care that is tailored to the needs and wishes of the individual and their family. Here, we describe the current understanding of prognostic factors at disease relapse such as principal molecular group, adverse molecular biology, and timing of relapse. We provide an overview of the clinical diagnostic process including signs and symptoms, staging investigations, and molecular pathology, followed by a summary of treatment modalities and considerations. Finally, we summarise future directions to progress understanding of treatment resistance and the biological mechanisms underpinning early therapy-refractory and relapsed disease. These initiatives include development of comprehensive and collaborative molecular profiling approaches at relapse, liquid biopsies such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as a biomarker of minimal residual disease (MRD), modelling strategies, and the use of primary tumour material for real-time drug screening approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca M. Hill
- Wolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (S.C.C.); (S.B.)
| | - Sabine L. A. Plasschaert
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (S.L.A.P.); (M.L.); (P.W.)
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Christelle Dufour
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 94800 Villejuif, France;
| | - Kristian Aquilina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London WC1N 3JH, UK;
| | - Shivaram Avula
- Department of Radiology, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L12 2AP, UK;
| | - Laura Donovan
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK;
| | - Maarten Lequin
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (S.L.A.P.); (M.L.); (P.W.)
| | - Torsten Pietsch
- Institute of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany;
| | - Ulrich Thomale
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Stephan Tippelt
- Department of Pediatrics III, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (CTNBS), University Hospital of Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Pieter Wesseling
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (S.L.A.P.); (M.L.); (P.W.)
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Rutkowski
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Steven C. Clifford
- Wolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (S.C.C.); (S.B.)
| | - Stefan M. Pfister
- Hopp Children’s Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon Bailey
- Wolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (S.C.C.); (S.B.)
| | - Gudrun Fleischhack
- Department of Pediatrics III, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (CTNBS), University Hospital of Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Prasad D, Vern-Gross T, Wolden S. Radiosurgery, reirradiation, and brachytherapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68 Suppl 2:e28531. [PMID: 33818888 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Radiosurgery and brachytherapy are potentially useful treatment techniques that are sparingly applied in pediatric oncology. They are often used in the setting of reirradiation for recurrent or metastatic tumors. Reirradiation in children with recurrent tumors is complicated by the tolerance of critical organs and the potential risks for overall long-term dose-dependent complications. We review the current literature available in support of reirradiation and the use of radiosurgery and brachytherapy in pediatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dheerendra Prasad
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center and Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, New York
| | | | - Suzanne Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Janssens GO, Mandeville HC, Timmermann B, Maduro JH, Alapetite C, Padovani L, Horan G, Lassen-Ramshad Y, Dieckmann K, Ruebe C, Thorp N, Gandola L, Ajithkumar T, Boterberg T. A rapid review of evidence and recommendations from the SIOPE radiation oncology working group to help mitigate for reduced paediatric radiotherapy capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic or other crises. Radiother Oncol 2020; 148:216-222. [PMID: 32342872 PMCID: PMC7184972 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To derive evidence-based recommendations for the optimal utilisation of resources during unexpected shortage of radiotherapy capacity. METHODS AND MATERIALS We have undertaken a rapid review of published literature on the role of radiotherapy in the multimodality treatment of paediatric cancers governing the European practise of paediatric radiotherapy. The derived data has been discussed with expert paediatric radiation oncologists to derive a hierarchy of recommendations. RESULTS The general recommendations to mitigate the potential detriment of an unexpected shortage of radiotherapy facilities include: (1) maintain current standards of care as long as possible (2) refer to another specialist paediatric radiotherapy department with similar level of expertise (3) prioritise use of existing radiotherapy resources to treat patients with tumours where radiotherapy has the most effect on clinical outcome (4) use chemotherapy to defer the start of radiotherapy where timing of radiotherapy is not expected to be detrimental (5) active surveillance for low-grade tumours if appropriate and (6) consider iso-effective hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens only for selected patients with predicted poor prognosis. The effectiveness of radiotherapy and recommendations for prioritisation of its use for common and challenging paediatric tumours are discussed. CONCLUSION This review provides evidence-based treatment recommendations during unexpected shortage of paediatric radiotherapy facilities. It has wider applications for the optimal utilisation of facilities, to improve clinical outcome in low- and middle-income countries, where limited resources continue to be a challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert O Janssens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands; Princess Maxima Centre for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Henry C Mandeville
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom; The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany
| | - John H Maduro
- Princess Maxima Centre for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Claire Alapetite
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Proton Center, Institut Curie, France
| | - Laetitia Padovani
- Aix-Marseille University, Oncology Radiotherapy Department, CRCM Inserm, UMR1068, CNRS UMR7258, AMU UM105, Genome Instability and Carcinogenesis, APHM, France
| | - Gail Horan
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | | | - Karin Dieckmann
- Department of Radiotherapy Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Ruebe
- Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Nicky Thorp
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, United Kingdom; The Proton Beam Therapy Centre, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Lorenza Gandola
- Pediatric Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Thankamma Ajithkumar
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
| | - Tom Boterberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Franceschi E, Hofer S, Brandes AA, Frappaz D, Kortmann RD, Bromberg J, Dangouloff-Ros V, Boddaert N, Hattingen E, Wiestler B, Clifford SC, Figarella-Branger D, Giangaspero F, Haberler C, Pietsch T, Pajtler KW, Pfister SM, Guzman R, Stummer W, Combs SE, Seidel C, Beier D, McCabe MG, Grotzer M, Laigle-Donadey F, Stücklin ASG, Idbaih A, Preusser M, van den Bent M, Weller M, Hau P. EANO-EURACAN clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of post-pubertal and adult patients with medulloblastoma. Lancet Oncol 2020; 20:e715-e728. [PMID: 31797797 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30669-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) and EUropean RAre CANcer (EURACAN) guideline provides recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of post-pubertal and adult patients with medulloblastoma. The guideline is based on the 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the CNS and on scientific developments published since 1980. It aims to provide direction for diagnostic and management decisions, and for limiting unnecessary treatments and cost. In view of the scarcity of data in adults with medulloblastoma, we base our recommendations on adult data when possible, but also include recommendations derived from paediatric data if justified. Our recommendations are a resource for professionals involved in the management of post-pubertal and adult patients with medulloblastoma, for patients and caregivers, and for health-care providers in Europe. The implementation of this guideline requires multidisciplinary structures of care, and defined processes of diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Franceschi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda USL, Bologna, Italy; IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy
| | - Silvia Hofer
- Division of Medical Oncology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Alba A Brandes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda USL, Bologna, Italy; IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy
| | - Didier Frappaz
- Department of Neuro-Oncology and Institut d'Hématologie et d'Oncologie Pédiatrique, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | - Jacoline Bromberg
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Volodia Dangouloff-Ros
- Paediatric Radiology Department, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Paris, France; UMR 1163, Imagine Institute, Paris, France
| | - Nathalie Boddaert
- Paediatric Radiology Department, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Paris, France; UMR 1163, Imagine Institute, Paris, France
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Steven C Clifford
- Wolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Dominique Figarella-Branger
- Aix-Marseille Univ, APHM, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, CHU Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France
| | - Felice Giangaspero
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomopathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Mediterranean Neurological Institute, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Christine Haberler
- Institute of Neurology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Torsten Pietsch
- Department of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumour Reference Center, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | - Kristian W Pajtler
- KiTZ Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg, Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, DKFZ German Cancer Research Center, DKTK German Cancer Consortium, and Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan M Pfister
- KiTZ Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg, Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, DKFZ German Cancer Research Center, DKTK German Cancer Consortium, and Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Raphael Guzman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, University Hospital and University Children's Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Walter Stummer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Clemens Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Dagmar Beier
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Martin G McCabe
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Michael Grotzer
- Department of Oncology, Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Florence Laigle-Donadey
- Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Paris, France
| | - Ana S Guerreiro Stücklin
- Department of Oncology, Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ahmed Idbaih
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris, France
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin van den Bent
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Peter Hau
- Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit and Department of Neurology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cuccia F, Mortellaro G, Ognibene L, Craparo G, Lo Casto A, Ferrera G. Salvage Re-irradiation Options in Adult Medulloblastoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. In Vivo 2020; 34:1283-1288. [PMID: 32354920 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Medulloblastoma is a rare tumor of adult age, while it occurs more frequently in children. Given the rarity, there is a lack of evidence for the treatment of recurrent disease. Few data are available about salvage re-irradiation collecting very heterogeneous series. CASE REPORT A 51-year-old male presented with headache, nausea, double vision, and gait disorders. A contrast-enhanced brain-MRI showed the presence of multifocal medulloblastoma. After surgery, adjuvant craniospinal radiotherapy was performed, chemotherapy was stopped due to toxicity. After 27 months, a new MRI and a Methionine-PET revealed a late pontocerebellar relapse; multidisciplinary board decided for a SBRT treatment. The second course of RT was well tolerated and 14 months later, the patient is alive in good general conditions, with no evidence of disease. CONCLUSION Our experience supports the use of salvage stereotactic radiotherapy as a safe and effective treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cuccia
- Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy .,Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Lucia Ognibene
- Radiotherapy Unit, San Gaetano Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine Center, Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Lo Casto
- Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo - Section of Radiology - Di.Bi.Med., Palermo, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chandy E, Taylor H, Gaito S, Wells E, Jones C, Meehan C, Burland H, Stone J, Snowball C, Mashru J, Riddell C, Hon Y, Welsh L, Saran F, Mandeville H. Hypofractionated Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Recurrent or Oligometastatic Tumours in Children and Young Adults. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:316-326. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
10
|
Tsang DS, Sarhan N, Ramaswamy V, Nobre L, Yee R, Taylor MD, Hawkins C, Bartels U, Huang A, Tabori U, Hodgson DC, Bouffet E, Laperriere N. Re-irradiation for children with recurrent medulloblastoma in Toronto, Canada: a 20-year experience. J Neurooncol 2019; 145:107-114. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03272-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 08/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
11
|
Outcomes of salvage re-irradiation in recurrent medulloblastoma correlate with age at initial diagnosis, primary risk-stratification, and molecular subgrouping. J Neurooncol 2019; 144:283-291. [PMID: 31236820 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03225-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report outcomes of salvage re-irradiation (re-RT) in recurrent/progressive medulloblastoma (MB). METHODS Medical records of patients treated with curative-intent re-RT as multi-modality management for recurrent/progressive MB between 2008 and 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS A total of 28 patients (median age 18 years at index diagnosis) were included. Molecular subgrouping was done using real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) based on the differential expression of select set of 12 protein coding genes and 9 microRNAs. Fifteen of 17 (88%) patients with sonic hedgehog (SHH)-MB developed isolated local recurrence within the index tumor-bed, while 5 of 7 (72%) patients with Group 4 MB developed localized relapse outside the posterior fossa. Diffuse neuraxial dissemination was seen in 2 patients with SHH-MB, and one each of Group 4 and wingless (WNT)-MB. Molecular subgrouping was not known in 3 patients. The dose and volume of re-RT was based on site and patterns of relapse, comprising unifocal in 18 (64%), multi-focal in 3 (11%), and repeat craniospinal irradiation (re-CSI) in 7 (25%) patients. Median interval from primary irradiation to re-RT was 49.5 months (range 24-98 months) with median cumulative biologically effective dose of 117 Gy (range 78-132 Gy). All patients received platinum-based salvage chemotherapy either before or after re-RT. One patient developed symptomatic radiation necrosis following re-CSI. At a median follow-up of 24 months (range 6-84 months), 2-year post-re-RT progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 46% and 51% respectively. Younger age (< 18 years) at index diagnosis, primary risk stratification (standard-risk) and molecular subgrouping (Group 4) were associated with significantly better post-re-RT outcomes. CONCLUSION Salvage re-RT provides good local control and encouraging survival outcomes with acceptable toxicity in selected patients with recurrent/progressive MB.
Collapse
|
12
|
Radiotherapy Advances in Paediatric Medulloblastoma Treatment. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:171-181. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2018] [Revised: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
13
|
Tsang D, Laperriere N. Re-irradiation for Paediatric Tumours. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:191-198. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Revised: 05/29/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
14
|
Radiosurgery or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy after craniospinal irradiation in children and adults with medulloblastoma and ependymoma. Childs Nerv Syst 2019; 35:267-275. [PMID: 30515559 PMCID: PMC6351705 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-018-4010-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the results and tolerance of radiosurgery/hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy performed after craniospinal irradiation for recurrent tumor. METHODS Fourteen patients aged 3-46 years, diagnosed with medulloblastoma (10), anaplastic ependymoma (3), and primitive neuroectodermal tumor (1). All patients had craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with the total dose of 30.6-36 Gy and boost to 53.9-60 Gy either during primary or during second-line treatment. Twelve patients were irradiated with a single dose of 6-15 Gy (median 14.5 Gy). One received three fractions of 5 Gy and one six fractions of 5 Gy. In statistical analysis, the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used. The overall survival was calculated from the date of the end of stereotactic radiosurgery to the date of death or last contact. RESULTS Recurrences were diagnosed after the median time of 16 months after the end of primary treatment. Eleven patients died during the follow-up. The follow-up for the 3 patients still alive was 6.7, 40.5, and 41.4 months, respectively. One- and 2-year overall survival (OS) was 70% and 39%. Patients who had ECOG performance status of 0 at the time of diagnosis of the disease trended to have better 2-year OS compared to those evaluated as ECOG 1 (p = 0.057). Treatment results were evaluable in 12 patients. Local control (stabilization or regression of the lesion) was achieved in 9 (75%). Overall disease progression was 67%. No patient developed radiation-induced necrosis. The treatment was well tolerated and no serious adverse effects were observed. Eleven patients were given steroids as a prevention of brain edema and four of them needed continuation of this treatment afterwards. In 7 patients, symptoms of brain edema were observed during the first weeks after reirradiation. CONCLUSIONS Stereotactic radiosurgery or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is an effective treatment method of the local recurrence after CSI and can be performed safely in heavily pre-treated patients.
Collapse
|
15
|
Waxweiler TV, Amini A, Vinogradskiy Y, Yeh N, Foreman NK, Hankinson TC, Liu AK. Hypofractionated re-irradiation to the brainstem in children with recurrent brain tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2017; 64. [PMID: 28342300 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2016] [Accepted: 10/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
To characterize radiation necrosis following hypofractionated brainstem re-irradiation in pediatric patients, we reviewed 23 cases with 28 tumors invading or abutting brainstem and treated with hypofractionated re-irradiation from 2004 to 2014. Re-irradiation delivered total doses of 16-30 Gy in two to five fractions. The most commons regimens used were 24 Gy in three fractions and 25 Gy in five fractions. At median follow-up of 12.8 months, median overall survival was 14.7 months and eight in-field recurrences were detected (median time 10.5 months). Five patients experienced symptomatic brainstem necrosis, and all having received 24 Gy in three fractions. Hypofractionated brainstem re-irradiation may be safer in five fractions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy V Waxweiler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Yevgeniy Vinogradskiy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Norman Yeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Nicholas K Foreman
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Todd C Hankinson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Arthur K Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhuang H, Zheng Y, Wang J, Chang JY, Wang X, Yuan Z, Wang P. Analysis of risk and predictors of brain radiation necrosis after radiosurgery. Oncotarget 2016; 7:7773-9. [PMID: 26675376 PMCID: PMC4884953 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.6532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2015] [Accepted: 11/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study, we examined the factors contributing to brain radiation necrosis and its predictors of patients treated with Cyberknife radiosurgery. A total of 94 patients with primary or metastatic brain tumours having been treated with Cyberknife radiotherapy from Sep. 2006 to Oct. 2011 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Skull based tracking was used to deliver radiation to 104 target sites. and the prescribed radiation doses ranged from 1200 to 4500 cGy in 1 to 8 fractions with a 60% to 87% isodose line. Radiation necrosis was confirmed by imaging or pathological examination. Associations between cerebral radiation necrosis and factors including diabetes, cardio-cerebrovascular disease, target volume, isodose line, prescribed dosage, number of fractions, combination with whole brain radiation and biologically equivalent dose (BED) were determined by logistic regression. ROC curves were created to measure the predictive accuracy of influence factors and identify the threshold for brain radiation necrosis. Our results showed that radiation necrosis occurred in 12 targets (11.54%). Brain radiation necrosis was associated by BED, combination with whole brain radiotherapy, and fractions (areas under the ROC curves = 0.892±0.0335, 0.650±0.0717, and 0.712±0.0637 respectively). Among these factors, only BED had the capability to predict brain radiation necrosis, and the threshold dose was 7410 cGy. In conclusion, BED is the most effective predictor of brain radiation necrosis, with a dose of 7410 cGy being identified as the threshold.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongqing Zhuang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy and Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin, China
| | - Yi Zheng
- Daqing Oilfield General Hospital, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Junjie Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Peking University 3rd Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiaoguang Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy and Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhiyong Yuan
- Department of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy and Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin, China
| | - Ping Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy and Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Medulloblastoma accounts for nearly 10% of all childhood brain tumors. These tumors occur exclusively in the posterior fossa and have the potential for leptomeningeal spread. Treatment includes a combination of surgery, radiation therapy (in patients >3 years old). Patients >3 years old are stratified based on the volume of postoperative residual tumor and the presence or absence of metastases into "standard risk" and "high risk" categories with long-term survival rates of approximately 85% and 70%, respectively. Outcomes are inferior in infants and children younger than 3 years with exception of those patients with the medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity histologic subtype. Treatment for medulloblastoma is associated with significant morbidity, especially in the youngest patients. Recent molecular subclassification of medulloblastoma has potential prognostic and therapeutic implications. Future incorporation of molecular subgroups into treatment protocols will hopefully improve both survival outcomes and posttreatment quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan E Millard
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin C De Braganca
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gultekin M, Cengiz M, Sezen D, Zorlu F, Yildiz F, Yazici G, Hurmuz P, Ozyigit G, Akyol F, Gurkaynak M. Reirradiation of Pediatric Tumors Using Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2016; 16:195-202. [PMID: 27352857 DOI: 10.1177/1533034616655952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for reirradiation of recurrent pediatric tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS The study included 23 pediatric patients who were reirradiated using hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the radiation oncology department between January 2008 and November 2013. In total, 33 tumors were treated-27 (82%) cranial and 6 (18%) extracranial. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy was administered due to recurrent disease in 31 (94%) tumors and residual disease in 2 (6%) tumors. The median total dose was 25 Gy (range: 15-40 Gy), and the median follow-up was 20 months (range: 2-68 months). RESULTS The 1-year and 2-year local control rates in the entire study population were 42% and 31%, respectively. The median local control time was 11 months (range: 0-54 months) following hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. The patients with tumor response after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy had significantly longer local control than the patients with post-hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy tumor progression (21 vs 3 months, P < .001). Tumor volume <1.58 cm3 was correlated (not significantly) with better local control (23 vs 7 months, P = .064). CONCLUSION Reirradiation of pediatric tumors using hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is a safe and effective therapeutic approach. This treatment modality should be considered as a treatment option in selected pediatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melis Gultekin
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Cengiz
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Duygu Sezen
- 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Faruk Zorlu
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ferah Yildiz
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gozde Yazici
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Pervin Hurmuz
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Ozyigit
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fadil Akyol
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Murat Gurkaynak
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ghose A, Morris JC, Breneman JC, Essell J, Wang J, Benzaquen S. Medulloblastoma in an Adult With Late Extraneural Metastases to the Mediastinum. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep 2014; 2:2324709614532798. [PMID: 26425604 PMCID: PMC4528885 DOI: 10.1177/2324709614532798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Medulloblastoma, although the most common brain tumor of childhood, is exceedingly rare in adults. These tumors have a propensity for local recurrence and to metastasize along the leptomeninges; however, extraneural metastases are very rare and typically occur in the bone or bone marrow. We have not come across any case in literature of medulloblastoma with mediastinal metastases in an adult. Case Presentation. We report a case of medulloblastoma in a 38-year-old lady who was treated with surgery followed by craniospinal radiation. Ten years later she presented with hoarseness from true vocal cord paralysis. She was diagnosed to have infiltrating metastases of her medulloblastoma to the mediastinum, which was confirmed by biopsy. There was no local recurrence. This was treated with chemotherapy followed by stem cell rescue, and she remained progression free for 2 years. Conclusion. Medulloblastomas are rare in adults and can present with late extraneural metastases following treatment. Although most common reported sites are bone and bone marrow, late metastases to other unexpected areas like the mediastinum are possible too and warrant awareness. This can be treated with chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue in a young patient with good performance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - James Essell
- Oncology Hematology Care Inc, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Jiang Wang
- University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Management of recurrent medulloblastoma in adult patients: a systematic review and recommendations. J Neurooncol 2013; 115:1-8. [PMID: 23877361 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-013-1206-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2013] [Accepted: 07/12/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Medulloblastoma accounts for almost one-third of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) cancers, but is very rare in the adult population. As a result, adult patients with medulloblastoma are often treated according to therapies developed for children with similarly staged disease at diagnosis, based on the assumption that adult and pediatric tumors have similar properties. The purpose of this review was to summarize the evidence and to make recommendations for the management of recurrent disease in adult patients with medulloblastoma. We conducted a systematic literature search to find publications addressing treatment of recurrent medulloblastoma in adults. Current treatment strategies for adult patients with relapsed medulloblastoma are based on the results of retrospective case series and published consensus recommendations, and include maximal safe re-resection where possible, combined with chemotherapy and/or re-irradiation. We describe the results of 13 publications involving 66 adult patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) plus stem cell transplantation for recurrent medulloblastoma. HDCT with stem cell transplantation may be a treatment option for a small proportion of adult patients who are unlikely to benefit from conventional chemotherapy and who are fit and have their disease recurrence contained within the CNS. Potential cases in which stem cell transplantation is being considered should be discussed at a multidisciplinary tumor board which includes involvement by hematologic oncologists and transplant specialists.
Collapse
|
21
|
Response to bevacizumab, irinotecan, and temozolomide in children with relapsed medulloblastoma: a multi-institutional experience. Childs Nerv Syst 2013; 29:589-96. [PMID: 23296323 PMCID: PMC3963487 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-012-2013-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2012] [Accepted: 12/19/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chemotherapy for relapsed medulloblastoma has been inadequate, and most patients succumb to disease. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed nine cases of relapsed medulloblastoma treated with bevacizumab, irinotecan, ± temozolomide. Patients received one to three prior therapeutic regimens. Five patients received 10 mg/kg bevacizumab and 125-150 mg/m(2) irinotecan IV every 2 weeks, with temozolomide, starting at a median dose of 150 mg/m(2) orally for 5 days monthly. Two patients received bevacizumab and irinotecan, but not temozolomide, due to provider preference. Two of nine patients received 15 mg/kg bevacizumab IV, 90 mg/m(2) irinotecan orally for five consecutive days, 100 mg/m(2)/day temozolomide IV for 5 days, and 1.5 mg/m(2) vincristine IV, each administered every 21 days. RESULTS Median time to progression was 11 months. Median overall survival was 13 months. Objective tumor response at 3 months was 67 %, including six patients with partial response (PR) and three patients with stable disease (SD). At 6 months, objective response was 55 %, with two patients with PR and three with complete response. Additionally, one patient had SD and three had PD. Two patients remain alive and progression free at 15 and 55 months; another is alive with disease at 20 months. Toxicities included two patients with grade III neutropenia, two with grade III thrombocytopenia, one with grade III elevation of liver function tests, and one patient with grade III diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS The combination of bevacizumab and irinotecan, with or without temozolomide, produces objective responses with minimal toxicity in children with recurrent medulloblastoma. Prospective clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of this strategy.
Collapse
|
22
|
Pérez-Espejo MA, Tobarra-González BM, Piqueras-Pérez CJ, Sola-Pérez J, Torroba A, Sánchez-Salinas A, Moraleda-Jiménez JM, de la Fuente-Muñoz I, García-Fernández R, López-Soler F, Martínez-Lage JF, Fernández-Pérez J. [Radiosurgery as adjuvant treatment of a recurrent adult medulloblastoma. Ultra-early response]. Neurocirugia (Astur) 2011; 22:554-7. [PMID: 22167285 DOI: 10.1016/s1130-1473(11)70109-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The role of radiosurgery after multimodality treatment of recurrent desmoplastic adult medulloblastoma is analyzed. The ultra-early clinical and pathological response of this tumor to adjunctive radiosurgery is stressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Pérez-Espejo
- Servicios de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario Virgen Arrixaca, Murcia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Reirradiation and concomitant metronomic temozolomide: an efficient combination for local control in medulloblastoma disease? J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2011; 33:600-4. [PMID: 22042276 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0b013e3182331eaf] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most common malignant pediatric brain tumor and a rare adulthood tumor. Twenty percent to 30% of patients relapses and displays a poor prognosis. The management of recurrent disease represents a medical challenge as salvage therapy with high-dose chemotherapy is disappointing. We report a pilot study of reirradiation and concomitant metronomic temozolomide of MB focal recurrence. Five patients from 10 to 27 years old at time of first diagnosis were treated initially with upfront radiation therapy at full dose. They relapsed focally and progressed under chemotherapy with a time recurrence ranged from 2 to 15 years after initial diagnosis. Patients were then treated with 3-dimensional conformal reirradiation focused on the relapsed disease with a median dose of 28 Gy (1.8 Gy per fraction) and concomitant temozolomide (75 mg/m/d) alone or as part of a multidrug metronomic regimen. Five complete responses were obtained at the end of metronomic radiochemotherapy. The median follow-up was 28 months. At last follow-up, 3 patients progressed outside radiation field under maintenance chemotherapy, and 1 is free of disease. Only 1 patient relapsed in the reirradiation field. No neurological toxicity was observed. These results indicate a possible radiosensitizing effect of concomitant metronomic temozolomide with radiation therapy. This association could play a role in the management of high-risk MB patient with oligometastasis disease to increase local control.
Collapse
|
24
|
Reirradiation of relapsed brain tumors in children. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2011; 17:32-7. [PMID: 24376994 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2011.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2011] [Revised: 09/06/2011] [Accepted: 10/07/2011] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to evaluate toxicity and response to fractionated reirradiation (FR) of relapsed primary brain tumors in children. BACKGROUND The treatment options for recurrent brain tumors in children previously irradiated are limited. Reirradiation is performed with fear due to the cumulative late CNS toxicity and the lack of a significant chance of cure. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2008 and 2009, eight children with a median age of 14.5 years with a diagnosis of a recurrent brain tumor underwent reirradiation. Initially, all patients were treated with surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The median time to the first recurrence after the initial treatment was 19.5 months. Intervals between radiotherapy courses were in the range of 5-51 mos. All retreatments were carried out with 3D image-based conformal methods. The total prescription dose was 40 Gy in a fraction of 5 × 2 Gy/week. The total cumulative dose ranged from 65 to 95 Gy (median: 75 Gy). The median cumulative biologically effective dose was 144 Gy (range: 126-181 Gy). RESULTS The median overall survival and progression free survival measured from the beginning of reirradiation was 17.5 and 6.5 months, respectively. During the first evaluation, four patients showed a complete or partial response, two did not respond radiologically. Two children were progressive at the time of reirradiation. Among children with progression that occurred during the first year after reirradiation, only two progressed in the treatment area. The repeated irradiation was well tolerated by all patients. No late complications have been observed. CONCLUSION In the absence of other treatment possibilities, the fractionated reirradiation with highly conformal three-dimensional planning could be a therapeutic choice in case of recurrent brain tumors in children. The control of craniospinal dissemination remains to be the main problem.
Collapse
|
25
|
Bakst RL, Dunkel IJ, Gilheeney S, Khakoo Y, Becher O, Souweidane MM, Wolden SL. Reirradiation for recurrent medulloblastoma. Cancer 2011; 117:4977-82. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2010] [Revised: 02/02/2011] [Accepted: 02/28/2011] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
26
|
Mueller S, Chang S. Pediatric brain tumors: current treatment strategies and future therapeutic approaches. Neurotherapeutics 2009; 6:570-86. [PMID: 19560746 PMCID: PMC5084192 DOI: 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2009] [Revised: 04/11/2009] [Accepted: 04/13/2009] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Pediatric CNS tumors are the most common solid tumors of childhood and the second most common cancer after hematological malignancies accounting for approximate 20 to 25% of all primary pediatric tumors. With over 3,000 new cases per year in the United States, childhood CNS tumors are the leading cause of death related to cancer in this population. The prognosis for these patients has improved over the last few decades, but current therapies continue to carry a high risk of significant side effects, especially for the very young. Currently a combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy is often used in children greater than 3 years of age. This article will outline current and future therapeutic strategies for the most common pediatric CNS tumors, including primitive neuroectodermal tumors such as medulloblastoma, as well as astrocytomas and ependymomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Mueller
- Department of Neurology, Division of Child Neurology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Merchant TE, Boop FA, Kun LE, Sanford RA. A retrospective study of surgery and reirradiation for recurrent ependymoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 71:87-97. [PMID: 18406885 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2007] [Revised: 09/05/2007] [Accepted: 09/12/2007] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report disease control for patients with recurrent ependymoma (EP) treated with surgery and a second course of radiation therapy (RT(2)). PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-eight pediatric patients (median age, 2.7 years) with initially localized EP at the time of definitive RT underwent a second course of RT after local (n = 21), metastatic (n = 13), or combined (n = 4) failure. Reirradiation included radiosurgery (n = 6), focal fractionated reirradiation (n = 13), or craniospinal irradiation (CSI; n = 19). RESULTS Initial time to failure was 16 months, and median age at second treatment was 4.8 years. Radiosurgery resulted in significant brainstem toxicity and one death (median dose, 18 Gy). Progression-free survival ratio was greater than unity for 4 of 6 patients; there was one long-term survivor. Three of 13 patients treated using focal fractionated reirradiation (median combined dose, 111.6 Gy) experienced metastasis. The CSI was administered to 12 patients with metastatic failure, 3 patients with local failure, and 4 patients with combined failure. The 4-year event-free survival rate was 53% +/- 20% for 12 patients with metastatic failure treated with CSI. Failure after CSI was observed in 1 of 3 patients with a history of local failure and 3 of 4 patients with a history of combined failure. CONCLUSION Patients with locally recurrent EP experience durable local tumor control, but remain at risk of metastasis. Patients with metastatic EP failure may receive salvage therapy that includes a component of CSI. Durability of disease control and long-term effects from this approach require further follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas E Merchant
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Division of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Saran F, Baumert BG, Creak AL, Warrington AP, Ashley S, Traish D, Brada M. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of recurrent or residual medulloblastoma/PNET. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008; 50:554-60. [PMID: 17941071 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.21382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of locally recurrent or residual central nervous system (CNS) primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1991 and 2005, 12 patients with locally recurrent medulloblastoma and two patients with residual supratentorial PNET were treated with hypofractionated stereotactic conformal radiotherapy (SCRT). Nine patients were treated for first recurrence, two patients after the 2nd, and one patient after 3rd recurrence. Median age at diagnosis was 20 years (range: 4-35 years) and median age at SCRT 25 years (range: 7-41 years). Nine of 12 patients underwent resection at recurrence and 13 patients received at least one cycle of chemotherapy prior to SCRT. All received focal SCRT (30-40 Gy/6-8 #) using non-coplanar arcs (n = 6) or fixed conformal non-coplanar fields (n = 8). RESULTS Median overall survival was 29 months (95% CI: 6-51 months) and median progression-free survival was 12 months (95% CI: 5-19 months). Local progression-free survival at 1 and 3 years was 80% (95% CI: 55-100%) and 48% (95% CI: 11-85%). Causes of death were recurrent CNS disease (n = 7), herpes encephalitis (n = 1), and metastatic PNET outside the CNS (n = 1). CONCLUSION Hypofractionated SCRT provides effective local control with acceptable toxicity for patients with recurrent localized PNET. However, overall long-term disease control is rare and limited by the occurrence of CSF mediated relapses, which thus could benefit from intensive systemic chemotherapy as part of the primary relapse strategy even in local recurrences. Larger multi-national studies will be necessary to assess the value of such combined treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Saran
- Neuro-oncology Unit and the Academic Unit of Radiotherapy and Oncology, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kalapurakal JA, Goldman S, Stellpflug W, Curran J, Sathiaseelan V, Marymont MH, Tomita T. Phase I study of intraoperative radiotherapy with photon radiosurgery system in children with recurrent brain tumors: preliminary report of first dose level (10 Gy). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 65:800-8. [PMID: 16580791 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2005] [Revised: 12/30/2005] [Accepted: 01/02/2006] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the preliminary results after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with the photon radiosurgery system in children with recurrent brain tumors treated at the first dose level (10 Gy) of a Phase I protocol. METHODS AND MATERIALS A Phase I IORT dose escalation protocol was initiated at Children's Memorial Hospital to determine the maximal tolerated IORT dose in children with recurrent brain tumors. RESULTS Fourteen children have received IORT thus far. Eight had been previously irradiated. Thirteen children had ependymoma. The median follow-up was 16 months. Three patients (21%) developed radiation necrosis on follow-up MRI scans 6 to 12 months after IORT. They had not been previously irradiated and had received 10 Gy to a depth of 5 mm. One required surgery and the other two had resolution of their lesions without treatment. All 3 patients were asymptomatic at the last follow-up. No other late toxicity was observed at the last follow-up visit. Eight patients (57%) had tumor control within the surgical bed after IORT. CONCLUSION Our findings have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of IORT to a dose of 10 Gy to 2 mm in children with previously irradiated brain tumors. IORT to a dose of 10 Gy at 5 mm was associated with a greater complication rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Kalapurakal
- Division of Radiation, Oncology Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abe M, Tokumaru S, Tabuchi K, Kida Y, Takagi M, Imamura J. Stereotactic radiation therapy with chemotherapy in the management of recurrent medulloblastomas. Pediatr Neurosurg 2006; 42:81-8. [PMID: 16465076 DOI: 10.1159/000090460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2005] [Accepted: 07/13/2005] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Medulloblastomas are highly lethal tumors when they recur. Very few patients survive with conventional treatment. This report documents the preliminary study results of a treatment for recurrent medulloblastomas consisting of stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) with chemotherapy. Four patients had local recurrence without apparent metastases and 8 patients had metastases with or without local recurrence. Twelve patients with 18 lesions underwent SRT as a single session (n=8) or in a hypofractionated manner (n=10) using a gamma knife or modified linear accelerator. All patients then received systemic chemotherapy. Five patients were treated with one to two sequential courses of high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. The reduction in tumor size after SRT was often remarkable. Fourteen of 18 lesions treated disappeared 1-6 months after SRT. Two of 4 patients who had local recurrences without apparent metastasis at the time of SRT are alive without evidence of disease 70 and 72 months after SRT, respectively. In contrast, all 8 patients with metastasis had new lesions either in the spinal canal or on the surface of the brain outside the target area of SRT. Median progression-free survival and overall survival from the time of SRT were 9 and 19 months, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS and overall survival at 3 years were 17 and 25%, respectively. One patient had brainstem edema after SRT causing bulbar palsy and quadriparesis. One patient died of toxicity of chemotherapy. Our experience suggests that local recurrence can be controlled by SRT with chemotherapy but survival of patients with metastases can not be improved effectively by SRT in conjunction with aggressive chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masamitsu Abe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, and Department of Neurosurgery, Komaki City Hospital, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Saran F. New technology for radiotherapy in paediatric oncology. Eur J Cancer 2004; 40:2091-105. [PMID: 15341984 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2003] [Revised: 11/26/2003] [Accepted: 12/03/2003] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Saran
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Brandes AA, Paris MK. Review of the prognostic factors in medulloblastoma of children and adults. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2004; 50:121-8. [PMID: 15157661 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2003.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/01/2003] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Medulloblastoma (MB) is rare in adults, accounting for 1% of all primary tumours of the central nervous system (CNS). Based on the assumption that the disease pattern in adults is similar to that in children, adults with medulloblastoma are treated using paediatric protocols. Thanks to progress made in recent years, long-term survival is now possible, with overall ranging from 50 to 60% at 5 years and 40 to 50% at 10 years. However, effective therapy may have devastating long-term side effects, including neuro-psychic and neuro-endocrine sequelae and cognitive dysfunction, especially in young adults. Great interest has been expressed in new biological and molecular prognostic factors, which, combined with clinical variables, may allow a more satisfactory stratification of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alba A Brandes
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital, Via Gattamelata 64, 35100 Padova, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|