Monitoring of motor evoked potentials with high intensity repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation during spinal surgery

Intraoperative responses of motor evoked potentials to the novel intravenous anesthetic remimazolam during spine surgery: a report of two cases

Background

Remimazolam is a novel short-acting benzodiazepine characterized by metabolism independent from organ function. We report intraoperative MEP responses of two patients who underwent spine surgery under general anesthesia using remimazolam.

Case presentation

In case 1, MEP monitoring was successfully performed with the use of a fixed dose of remimazolam at 0.5 mg/kg/h and remifentanil at 0.2 μg/kg/min. In case 2, an increasing dose of remimazolam from 0.5 to 1.5 mg/kg/h during the operation did not affect MEP signals. In both cases, remimazolam was titrated to maintain the values of entropy electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring at 40–60.

Conclusions

General anesthesia using remimazolam and remifentanil can be a valuable alternative for spine surgery with MEP monitoring by EEG to assess the optimal dose.

Warning thresholds on the basis of origin of amplitude changes in transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring for cervical compression myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from consecutive patients undergoing transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential (TCE-MEP: compound muscle action potentials) monitoring during cervical spine surgery. OBJECTIVE.: To divide the warning threshold of TCE-MEP amplitude changes on the basis of origin into the spinal tract and spinal segments and decide warning thresholds for each.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The parameter commonly used for the warning threshold in TCE-MEP monitoring is wave amplitude, but amplitude changes have not been examined by anatomical origin.

METHODS

Intraoperative TCE-MEP amplitude changes were reviewed for 357 patients with cervical myelopathy. Most of the patients were monitored by transcranial electrical stimulated spinal-evoked potential combined with TCE-MEP. The warning threshold of TCE-MEP was taken as waveform disappearance. For each patient, amplitude changes were separated, according to origin, into the spinal tract and spinal segments and compared with clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Assessable TCE-MEP waves were obtained in 350 cases. Disappearance of TCE-MEP waves, which were innervated by the spinal levels exposed to the surgical invasion, was seen in 11 cases. Disappearance of TCE-MEPs, which were innervated by the spinal levels inferior to them, was seen in 43 cases. There was no postoperative motor deficit in those cases. However, such deficits caused by spinal segment injury were seen in 2 cases, which showed that intraoperative amplitude decreased to 4.5% and 27%.

CONCLUSION

If we had established the warning threshold as 30% of the control amplitude, we would likely have prevented both cases of postoperative motor deficits, but 106 (30.3%) cases would have become positive cases. If we had established the warning threshold separately as wave disappearance for the spinal tract and 30% of the control amplitude for the spinal segments, sensitivity and specificity would have been 100% and 83.7%, respectively. Dividing the warning threshold on the basis of origin of amplitude changes could reduce false-positive cases and prevent intraoperative injuries.

Transcranial Electrocortical Stimulation to Monitor the Facial Nerve Motor Function During Cerebellopontine Angle Surgery

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to investigate the success rate of using the facial motor evoked potential (FMEP) of orbicularis oculi and oris muscles for facial nerve function monitoring with use of a stepwise protocol, and its usefulness in predicting facial nerve outcome during cerebellopontine angle (CPA) surgeries.

METHODS

FMEPs were recorded intraoperatively from 60 patients undergoing CPA surgeries. Transcranial electrocortical stimulation (TES) was performed using corkscrew electrodes positioned at hemispheric montage (C3/C4 and CZ). The contralateral abductor pollicis brevis muscle was used as the control response. Stimulation was always applied contralaterally to the affected side using 1, 3, or 5 rectangular pulses ranging from 200 to 600 V with 50 μs of pulse duration and an interstimulus interval of 2 ms. Facial potentials were recorded from needles placed in the orbicularis oculi and oris muscles.

RESULTS

FMEP from the orbicularis oris and oculi muscles could be reliably monitored in 86.7% and 85% of the patients, respectively. The immediate postoperative facial function correlated significantly with the FMEP ratio in the orbicularis oculi muscle at 80% amplitude ratio (P = .037) and orbicularis oris muscle at 35% ratio (P = .000). FMEP loss was always related to postoperative facial paresis, although in different degrees.

CONCLUSION

FMEPs can be obtained reliably by using TES with 3 to 5 train pulses. Stable intraoperative FMEPs can predict a good postoperative outcome of facial function. However, further refinements of this technique are necessary to minimize artifacts and to make this method more reliable.

Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 15: electrophysiological monitoring and lumbar fusion

Based on the medical evidence provided by the literature reviewed, there does not appear to be support for the hypothesis that any form of intraoperative monitoring improves patient outcomes following lumbar decompression or fusion procedures for degenerative spinal disease. Evidence does indicate that a normal evoked EMG response is predictive for intrapedicular screw placement (high NPV for breakout). The presence of an abnormal EMG response does not, however, exclude intrapedicular screw placement (low PPV). The majority of clinically apparent postoperative nerve injuries are associated with intraoperative changes in SSEP and/or DSEP monitoring. For this reason, changes in DSEP/SSEP monitoring appear to be sensitive to nerve root injury. There is a high-false positive rate, however, and changes in DSEP and SSEP recordings are frequently not related to nerve injury. A normal study has been shown to correlate with the lack of a significant postoperative nerve injury. There is no substantial evidence to indicate that the use of intraoperative monitoring of any kind provides useful information to the surgeon in terms of assessing the adequacy of nerve root decompression at the time of surgery.