Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor administration ameliorates liver regeneration in animal model of fulminant hepatic failure and encephalopathy

Efficacy of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Acute on Chronic Liver Failure: A Systematic Review and Survival Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) mostly occurs when there is an acute insult to the liver in patients with pre-existing liver disease, and it is characterized by a high mortality rate. Various therapeutic approaches have been used thus far, with orthotopic liver transplantation being the only definitive cure. Clinical trials and meta-analyses have investigated the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize bone marrow-derived stem cells. Some studies have suggested that G-CSF may have a significant role in the management and survival of patients with ACLF. However, the results are conflicting, and the efficacy of G-CSF still needs to be confirmed.

AIM

The aim was to assess the efficacy of G-CSF in patients with ACLF.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched until May 2023 for randomized controlled trials investigating the use of G-CSF in adult patients with ACLF. Outcome measures were the effects of G-CSF on overall survival, changes in liver disease severity scores, complications of cirrhosis, other G-CSF-related adverse effects, and all-cause mortality. The study's protocol has been registered with Prospero (CRD42023420273).

RESULTS

Five double-blind randomized controlled trials involving a total of 421 participants met the inclusion criteria. The use of G-CSF demonstrated a significant effect on overall survival (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.95, and I2 48%), leading to a decreased mortality (LogOR-0.97, 95% CI -1.57 to -0.37, and I2 37.6%) and improved Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores (SMD -0.87, 95% CI -1.62 to -0.13, and I2 87.3%). There was no correlation between the improvement of the Child-Pugh score and the use of G-CSF(SMD -2.47, 95% CI -5.78 to 0.83, and I2 98.1%). The incidence of complications of cirrhosis did not decrease significantly with G-CSF treatment (rate ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.01, and I2 90%). A qualitative synthesis showed that the use of G-CSF is safe.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of G-CSF has demonstrated a positive impact on overall survival, liver function, and the MELD score. The presence of heterogeneity in the included studies prohibits conclusive recommendations.

Review article: Emerging and current management of acute-on-chronic liver failure

BACKGROUND

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a clinically and pathophysiologically distinct condition from acutely decompensated cirrhosis and is characterised by systemic inflammation, extrahepatic organ failure, and high short-term mortality.

AIMS

To provide a narrative review of the diagnostic criteria, prognosis, epidemiology, and general management principles of ACLF. Four specific interventions that are explored in detail are intravenous albumin, extracorporeal liver assist devices, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, and liver transplantation.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Cochrane databases for articles published up to July 2023.

RESULTS

Approximately 35% of hospital inpatients with decompensated cirrhosis have ACLF. There is significant heterogeneity in the criteria used to diagnose ACLF; different definitions identify different phenotypes with varying mortality. Criteria established by the European Association for the Study of the Liver were developed in prospective patient cohorts and are, to-date, the most well validated internationally. Systemic haemodynamic instability, renal dysfunction, coagulopathy, neurological dysfunction, and respiratory failure are key considerations when managing ACLF in the intensive care unit. Apart from liver transplantation, there are no accepted evidence-based treatments for ACLF, but several different approaches are under investigation.

CONCLUSION

The recognition of ACLF as a distinct entity from acutely decompensated cirrhosis has allowed for better patient stratification in clinical settings, facilitating earlier engagement with the intensive care unit and liver transplantation teams. Research priorities over the next decade should focus on exploring novel treatment strategies with a particular focus on which, when, and how patients with ACLF should be treated.

Future Approaches and Therapeutic Modalities for Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) results from an acute decompensation of cirrhosis due to exogenous insult. The condition is characterized by a severe systemic inflammatory response, inappropriate compensatory anti-inflammatory response, multisystem extrahepatic organ failure, and high short-term mortality. Here, the authors evaluate the current status of potential treatments for ACLF and assess their efficacy and therapeutic potential.

Emerging Pharmacotherapies in Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis

The incidence of alcoholic-associated hepatitis (AH) is increasing. The treatment options for severe AH (sAH) are scarce and limited to corticosteroid therapy which showed limited mortality benefit in short-term use only. Therefore, there is a dire need for developing safe and effective therapies for patients with sAH and to improve their high mortality rates.This review article focuses on the current novel therapeutics targeting various mechanisms in the pathogenesis of alcohol-related hepatitis. Anti-inflammatory agents such as IL-1 inhibitor, Pan-caspase inhibitor, Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase-1, and CCL2 inhibitors are under investigation. Other group of agents include gut-liver axis modulators, hepatic regeneration, antioxidants, and Epigenic modulators. We describe the ongoing clinical trials of some of the new agents for alcohol-related hepatitis.

Conclusion

A combination of therapies was investigated, possibly providing a synergistic effect of drugs with different mechanisms. Multiple clinical trials of novel therapies in AH remain ongoing. Their result could potentially make a difference in the clinical course of the disease. DUR-928 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor had promising results and further trials are ongoing to evaluate their efficacy in the large patient sample.

Combination of G-CSF and a TLR4 inhibitor reduce inflammation and promote regeneration in a mouse model of ACLF

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is characterised by high short-term mortality, systemic inflammation, and failure of hepatic regeneration. Its treatment is a major unmet medical need. This study was conducted to explore whether combining TAK-242, a Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4) antagonist, with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), could reduce inflammation whilst enhancing liver regeneration.

METHODS

Two mouse models of ACLF were investigated. Chronic liver injury was induced by carbon tetrachloride; lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or galactosamine (GalN) were then administered as extrahepatic or hepatic insults, respectively. G-CSF and/or TAK-242 were administered daily. Treatment durations were 24 hours and 5 days in the LPS model and 48 hours in the GalN model.

RESULTS

In a mouse model of LPS-induced ACLF, treatment with G-CSF was associated with significant mortality (66% after 48 hours vs. 0% without G-CSF). Addition of TAK-242 to G-CSF abrogated mortality (0%) and significantly reduced liver cell death, macrophage infiltration and inflammation. In the GalN model, both G-CSF and TAK-242, when used individually, reduced liver injury but their combination was significantly more effective. G-CSF treatment, with or without TAK-242, was associated with activation of the pro-regenerative and anti-apoptotic STAT3 pathway. LPS-driven ACLF was characterised by p21 overexpression, which is indicative of hepatic senescence and inhibition of hepatocyte regeneration. While TAK-242 treatment mitigated the effect on senescence, G-CSF, when co-administered with TAK-242, resulted in a significant increase in markers of hepatocyte regeneration.

CONCLUSION

The combination of TAK-242 and G-CSF inhibits inflammation, promotes hepatic regeneration and prevents mortality in models of ACLF; thus, this combination could be a potential treatment option for ACLF.

LAY SUMMARY

Acute-on-chronic liver failure is associated with severe liver inflammation and poor short-term survival. Therefore, effective treatments are urgently needed. Herein, we have shown, using mouse models, that the combination of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (which can promote liver regeneration) and TAK-242 (which inhibits a receptor that plays a key role in inflammation) could be effective for the treatment of acute-on-chronic liver failure.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) in 2022: have novel treatment paradigms already arrived?

INTRODUCTION

Acute-on-chronic failure (ACLF) is a recognized syndrome in patients with chronic liver disease and is characterized by acute decompensation, organ failure(s), and a high short-term mortality. ACLF is often triggered by ongoing alcohol consumption, gastrointestinal bleeding and/or infections, and is pathophysiologically characterized by uncontrolled systemic inflammation coupled with paradoxical immunoparesis. Patients with ACLF require prompt and early recognition. Management requires extensive utilization of clinical resources often including escalation to intensive care.

AREAS COVERED

Currently, there are no specific targeted treatments for established ACLF, and management revolves around treating underlying precipitants and providing organ support. In this article, we review the epidemiology and pathophysiology of ACLF and summarize recent advances in management strategies of this syndrome, focusing specifically on novel emerging therapies.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

ACLF is a challenging condition with rapid clinical course, high short-term mortality and varying clinical phenotypes. Management of ACLF is broadly focused on supportive care often in an intensive care setting with liver transplantation proving to be an increasingly relevant and effective rescue therapy. This disease has clear pathogenesis and epidemiological burden, thus distinguishing it from decompensated cirrhosis; there is clear clinical need for the development of specific and nuanced therapies to treat this condition.

Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Accelerates the Recovery of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure by Promoting M2-Like Transition of Monocytes

Background and Aim

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) has a high mortality rate. The role of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in ACLF remains controversial. Monocytes/macrophages are core immune cells, which are involved in the initiation and progression of liver failure; however, the effect of G-CSF on monocytes/macrophages is unclear. The study aimed to verify the clinical efficacy of G-CSF and explore the effect of it on monocytes in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related ACLF (HBV-ACLF) paitents.

Methods

We performed a large randomized controlled clinical trial for the treatment of HBV-ACLF using G-CSF. A total of 111 patients with HBV-ACLF were prospectively randomized into the G-CSF group (5 μg/kg G-CSF every day for 6 days, then every other day until day 18) or the control group (standard therapy). All participants were followed up for at least 180 days. The relationship between monocyte count and mortality risk was analyzed. The effect of G-CSF on the phenotype and function of monocytes from patients with HBV-ACLF was evaluated using flow cytometry in vivo and in vitro experiments.

Results

The survival probability of the G-CSF group at 180 days was higher than that of the control group (72.2% vs. 53.8%, P = 0.0142). In the G-CSF-treated group, the monocyte counts on days 0 and 7 were independently associated with an evaluated mortality risk in the fully adjusted model (Model 3) [at day 0: hazard ratio (HR) 95% confidence interval (CI): 15.48 (3.60, 66.66), P = 0.0002; at day 7: HR (95% CI): 1.10 (0.50, 2.43), P=0.8080]. Further analysis showed that after treatment with G-CSF in HBV-ACLF patients, the expression of M1-like markers (HLA-DR and CD86) in monocytes decreased (HLA-DR: P = 0.0148; CD86: P = 0.0764). The expression of MerTK (M2-like marker) increased (P = 0.0002). The secretion of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 from monocytes decreased without lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation (TNF-α: P < 0.0001; IL-6: P= 0.0025; IL-10: P = 0.0004) or with LPS stimulation (TNF-α: P = 0.0439; P = 0.0611; IL-10: P = 0.0099). Similar effects were observed in vitro experiments.

Conclusion

G-CSF therapy confers a survival benefit to patients with HBV-ACLF. G-CSF can promote the anti-inflammatory/pro-restorative phenotype (M2-like) transition of monocytes, which may contribute to the recovery of ACLF.

Emerging Therapies for Alcoholic Hepatitis

The incidence of alcoholic hepatitis is increasing while the mortality rate remains high. The single current available therapy for severe alcoholic hepatitis is administration of corticosteroids for patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis, which has demonstrated limited benefits, providing a short-term mortality benefit with a marginal response rate. There is a need for developing safe and effective therapies. This article reviews novel therapies targeting various mechanisms in the pathogenesis of alcoholic hepatitis, such as the gut-liver axis, inflammatory cascade, oxidative stress, and hepatic regeneration. Current ongoing clinical trials for alcoholic hepatitis also are described.

The Current Status of Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor to Treat Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) have a devastating prognosis and therapeutic options are limited. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilizes immune and stem cells and possess immune-modulatory and proregenerative capacities. In this review, we aim to define the current evidence for the treatment with G-CSF in end-stage liver disease. Several smaller clinical trials in patients with different severity grades of end-stage liver disease have shown that G-CSF improves survival and reduces the rate of complications. Adequately powered multicenter European trials could not confirm these beneficial effects. In mouse models of ACLF, G-CSF increased the toll-like receptor (TLR)-mediated inflammatory response which led to an increase in mortality. Adding a TLR4 signaling inhibitor allowed G-CSF to unfold its proregenerative properties in these ACLF models. These data suggest that G-CSF requires a noninflammatory environment to exert its protective properties.

Insights into the Role of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis

Alcohol use disorder is the predominant cause of chronic liver disease globally. The standard of care for the treatment of alcoholic hepatitis, corticosteroids, has been shown to provide a therapeutic response in ∼60% of carefully selected patients with a short-term survival benefit. The patients who do not respond to steroids, or are ineligible due to infections or very severe disease, have little options other than liver transplantation. There is, thus, a large unmet need for new therapeutic strategies for this large and sick group of patients. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been shown to favorably modulate the intrahepatic immune milieu and stimulate the regenerative potential of the liver. Initial studies have shown encouraging results with G-CSF in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis. It has also been found to help steroid nonresponsive patients. There is, however, a need for careful selection of patients, regular dose monitoring and close observation for adverse events of G-CSF. In this review, we analyze the basis of the potential benefits, clinical studies, cautions and challenges in the use of G-CSF in alcoholic hepatitis.

Approaches for patients with very high MELD scores

In the era of the "sickest first" policy, patients with very high model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores have been increasingly admitted to the intensive care unit with the expectation that they will receive a liver transplant (LT) in the absence of improvement on supportive therapies. Such patients are often admitted in a context of acute-on-chronic liver failure with extrahepatic failures. Sequential assessment of scores or classification based on organ failures within the first days after admission help to stratify the risk of mortality in this population. Although the prognosis of severely ill cirrhotic patients has recently improved, transplant-free mortality remains high. LT is still the only curative treatment in this population. Yet, the increased relative scarcity of graft resource must be considered alongside the increased risk of losing a graft in the initial postoperative period when performing LT in "too sick to transplant" patients. Variables associated with poor immediate post-LT outcomes have been identified in large studies. Despite this, the performance of scores based on these variables is still insufficient. Consideration of a patient's comorbidities and frailty is an appealing predictive approach in this population that has proven of great value in many other diseases. So far, local expertise remains the last safeguard to LT. Using this expertise, data are accumulating on favourable post-LT outcomes in very high MELD populations, particularly when LT is performed in a situation of stabilization/improvement of organ failures in selected candidates. The absence of "definitive" contraindications and the control of "dynamic" contraindications allow a "transplantation window" to be defined. This window must be identified swiftly after admission given the poor short-term survival of patients with very high MELD scores. In the absence of any prospect of LT, withdrawal of care could be discussed to ensure respect of patient life, dignity and wishes.

Treatment of AECHB and Severe Hepatitis (Liver Failure)

This chapter describes the general treatment and immune principles and internal management for AECHB and HBV ACLF, including ICU monitoring, general supportive medications/nutrition/nursing, immune therapy, artificial liver supportive systems, hepatocyte/stem cell, and liver transplant, management for special populations, frequently clinical complications and the utilization of Chinese traditional medicines.

Early clinical indicators of severe hepatitis B include acratia, gastrointestinal symptoms, a daily increase in serum bilirubin >1 mg/dL, toxic intestinal paralysis, bleeding tendency and mild mind anomaly or character change, and the presence of other diseases inducing severe hepatitis. Laboratory indicators include T-Bil, PTA, cholinesterase, pre-albumin and albumin. The roles of immune indicators (such as IL-6, TNF-α, and fgl2), gene polymorphisms, HBV genotypes, and gene mutations as early clinical indicators.

Intensive Care Unit monitor patients with severe hepatitis include intracranial pressure, infection, blood dynamics, respiratory function, renal function, blood coagulation function, nutritional status and blood purification process. Nursing care should not only include routine care, but psychological and special care (complications).

Nutrition support and nursing care should be maintained throughout treatment for severe hepatitis. Common methods of evaluating nutritional status include direct human body measurement, creatinine height index (CHI) and subject global assessment of nutrition (SGA). Malnourished patients should receive enteral or parenteral nutrition support.

Immune therapies for severe hepatitis include promoting hepatocyte regeneration (e.g. with glucagon, hepatocyte growth factor and prostaglandin E1), glucocorticoid suppressive therapy, and targeting molecular blocking. Corticosteroid treatment should be early and sufficient, and adverse drug reactions monitored. Treatments currently being investigated are those targeting Toll-like receptors, NK cell/NK cell receptors, macrophage/immune coagulation system, CTLA-4/PD-1 and stem cell transplantation.

In addition to conventional drugs and radioiodine, corticosteroids and artificial liver treatment can also be considered for severe hepatitis patients with hyperthyreosis. Patients with gestational severe hepatitis require preventive therapy for fetal growth restriction, and it is necessary to choose the timing and method of fetal delivery. For patients with both diabetes and severe hepatitis, insulin is preferred to oral antidiabetic agents to control blood glucose concentration. Liver toxicity of corticosteroids and immune suppressors should be monitored during treatment for severe hepatitis in patients with connective tissue diseases including SLE, RA and sicca syndrome. Patient with connective tissue diseases should preferably be started after the antiviral treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues.

An artificial liver can improve patients’ liver function; remove endotoxins, blood ammonia and other toxins; correct amino acid metabolism and coagulation disorders; and reverse internal environment imbalances. Non-bioartificial livers are suitable for patients with early and middle stage severe hepatitis; for late-stage patients waiting for liver transplantation; and for transplanted patients with rejection reaction or transplant failure. The type of artificial liver should be determined by each patient’s condition and previous treatment purpose, and patients should be closely monitored for adverse reactions and complications. Bio- and hybrid artificial livers are still under development.

MELD score is the international standard for choosing liver transplantation. Surgical methods mainly include the in situ classic type and the piggyback type; transplantation includes no liver prophase, no liver phase or new liver phase. Preoperative preparation, management of intraoperative and postoperative complications and postoperative long-term treatment are keys to success.

Severe hepatitis belongs to the categories of “acute jaundice”, “scourge jaundice”, and “hot liver” in traditional Chinese medicine. Treatment methods include Chinese traditional medicines, acupuncture and acupoint injection, external application of drugs, umbilical compress therapy, drip, blow nose therapy, earpins, and clysis. Dietary care is also an important part of traditional Chinese medicine treatment.

Effects of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor on Patients with Liver Failure: a Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

It remains controversial whether granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prolongs survival in liver failure (LF) patients. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of G-CSF on patients with LF.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify English language randomized controlled trials comparing G-CSF with control therapy published before14 February 2015. A meta-analysis was performed to examine changes in liver function and patient survival. The association was tested using odds ratio (OR) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials were eligible for the meta-analysis. Significant amelioration of prothrombin time and total bilirubin in LF patients was attributed to G-CSF therapy (OR, -0.064; 95% CI,-0.481 to 0.353; p< 0.001; and OR, -0.803; 95% CI, -1.177 to -0.430; p = 0.000, respectively). Treatment with G-CSF resulted in improved Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores (OR, -1.741; 95% CI, -2.234 to -1.250; p = 0.000; and OR, -0.830, 95% CI, -1.194 to -0.465; p = 0.000, respectively). A lower incidence of sepsis was found in patients treated with G-CSF (RR, 0.367; 95% CI, 0.158 to 0.854; p = 0.020). G-CSF therapy significantly increased survival rate in LF patients (RR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.517 to 3.338; p = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis indicate that G-CSF treatment in patients with LF significantly improved liver function, reduced the incidence of sepsis, and prolonged short-term survival.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in severe alcoholic hepatitis: a randomized pilot study

OBJECTIVES

Severe alcoholic hepatitis has high short-term mortality. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that treatment of patients with alcoholic hepatitis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) might mobilize bone marrow-derived stem cells and promote hepatic regeneration and thus improve survival.

METHODS

Forty-six patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis were prospectively randomized in an open study to standard medical therapy (SMT) plus G-CSF (group A; n=23) at a dose of 5 μg/kg subcutaneously every 12 h for 5 consecutive days or to SMT alone (group B; n=23) at a tertiary care center. We assessed the mobilization of CD34(+) cells on day 6, Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), and modified Maddrey's discriminant function (mDF) scores, and survival until day 90.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant increase in the number of CD34(+) cells in peripheral blood in group A as compared with group B (P=0.019) after 5 days of G-GSF therapy. There was a significant reduction in median Δ change% in CTP, MELD, and mDF at 1, 2, and 3 months in group A as compared with group B (P<0.05). There was marked improvement in survival in group A as compared with group B (78.3% vs. 30.4%; P=0.001) at 90 days.

CONCLUSIONS

G-CSF is safe and effective in the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells and improves liver function as well as survival in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis.

G-CSF therapy for severe alcoholic hepatitis: targeting liver regeneration or neutrophil function?

Severe alcoholic hepatitis is a life-threatening liver disease. Although corticosteroid treatment is recommended and improves survival, mortality remains high and 35% of patients die within 6 months. There is no available medical treatment for patients who do not respond to corticosteroids. A new randomized pilot trial shows that the administration of the cytokine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) improves liver function and 3-month survival in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis. These results suggest a new therapeutic approach for severe alcoholic hepatitis.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilizes CD34(+) cells and improves survival of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) develops in patients with chronic liver disease and has high mortality. Mobilization of bone marrow-derived stem cells with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) could promote hepatic regeneration.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with ACLF were randomly assigned to groups given 5 μg/kg G-CSF subcutaneously (12 doses; group A, n = 23) or placebo (group B, n = 24) plus standard medical therapy. We assessed survival until day 60; Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores; and the development of other related complications.

RESULTS

After 1 week of treatment, group A had higher median leukocyte and neutrophil counts than group B (P < .001). Sixteen patients in group A (69.6%) and 7 in group B (29%) survived; the actuarial probability of survival at day 60 was 66% versus 26%, respectively (P = .001). Treatment with G-CSF also reduced CTP scores in group A by a median of 33.3% compared with an increase of 7.1% in group B (P = .001), along with MELD (median reduction of 15.3% compared with an increase of 11.7% in group B; P = .008) and SOFA scores (median reduction of 50% compared with an increase of 50% in group B; P = .001). The percentages of patients who developed hepatorenal syndrome, hepatic encephalopathy, or sepsis were lower in group A than in group B (19% vs 71% [P = .0002], 19% vs 66% [P = .001], and 14% vs 41% [P = .04], respectively). After 1 month of treatment, G-CSF increased the number of CD34(+) cells in the liver (by 45% compared with 27.5% in group B; P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

G-CSF therapy more than doubles the percentage of patients with ACLF who survive for 2 months; it also significantly reduces CTP, MELD, and SOFA scores and prevents the development of sepsis, hepatorenal syndrome, and hepatic encephalopathy.

Management of Liver Failure: From Transplantation to Cell-Based Therapy

The severe shortage of deceased donor organs has driven a search for alternative methods of treating liver failure. In this context, cell-based regenerative medicine is emerging as a promising interdisciplinary field of tissue repair and restoration, able to contribute to improving health in a minimally invasive fashion. Several cell types have allowed long-term survival in experimental models of liver injury, but their therapeutic potential in humans should be regarded with deep caution, because few clinical trials are currently available and the number of patients enrolled so far is too small to assess benefits versus risks. This review summarizes the current literature on the physiological role of endogenous stem cells in liver regeneration and on the therapeutic benefits of exogenous stem cell administration with specific emphasis on the potential clinical uses of mesenchymal stem cells. Moreover, critical points that still need clarification, such as the exact identity of the stem-like cell population exerting the beneficial effects, as well as the limitations of stem cell-based therapies, are discussed.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment ameliorates liver injury and improves survival in rats with D-galactosamine-induced acute liver failure

Only liver transplantation is currently available therapy for the patients with acute liver failure (ALF). This study was designed to determine whether administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has therapeutic efficacy in animals with ALF. Female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were intraperitoneally injected with a single dose of d-galactosamine (d-GalN, 1.4g/kg) to induce ALF. After 2h, the rats were randomized to receive G-CSF (50μg/kg/day), or saline vehicle injection for 5 days. Rats were observed for survival and assessed for liver injury by serum alanine transaminase (ALT) measurement and histological analysis. CD34+ cells in bone marrow were assessed by flow cytometry. CD34+ cells and Ki-67+ hepatocytes in liver tissue were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. In the ALF model, 5-day survival after d-GalN injection was 33.3% (10/30), while G-CSF administration following d-GalN resulted in 53.3% (16/30) survival (p=0.027). G-CSF treated rats had lower ALT level and less hepatic injury compared with saline vehicle rats. The increases of CD34+ cells in bone marrow and liver tissue and Ki-67+ cells in liver tissue in G-CSF treated rats were higher than those in saline rats. No correlation was observed between CD34+ cells and Ki-67+ hepatocytes in liver tissue in both G-CSF and vehicle rats. It is suggested that G-CSF increases survival rate, decreases liver injury and enhances hepatocyte proliferation in rats with d-GalN-induced ALF possibly through actions including but not limiting to CD34+ cell mobilization, and that G-CSF may be of potential value in treating ALF.

Advances in the regulation of liver regeneration

Liver regeneration is known to be a process involving highly organized and ordered tissue growth triggered by the loss of liver tissue, and remains a fascinating topic. A large number of genes are involved in this process, and there exists a sequence of stages that results in liver regeneration, while at the same time inhibitors control the size of the regenerated liver. The initiation step is characterized by priming of quiescent hepatocytes by factors such as TNF-α, IL-6 and nitric oxide. The proliferation step is the step during which hepatocytes enter into the cell cycle's G1 phase and are stimulated by complete mitogens including HGF, TGF-α and EGF. Hepatic stimulator substance, glucagon, insulin, TNF-α, IL-1 and IL-6 have also been implicated in regulating the regeneration process. Inhibitors and stop signals of hepatic regeneration are not well known and only limited information is available. Furthermore, the effects of other factors such as VEGF, PDGF, hypothyroidism, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, heat shock proteins, ischemic-reperfusion injury, steatosis and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on liver regeneration are also systematically reviewed in this article. A tissue engineering approach using isolated hepatocytes for in vitro tissue generation and heterotopic transplantation of liver cells has been established. The use of stem cells might also be very attractive to overcome the limitation of donor liver tissue. Liver-specific differentiation of embryonic, fetal or adult stem cells is currently under investigation.

Serum levels of platelet-derived growth factor-BB and vascular endothelial growth factor as prognostic factors for patients with fulminant hepatic failure

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In animal models for acute liver injury, the administration of some angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) are shown to reduce liver injury and improve liver proliferative capacity. The aim of the present study was to assess the role of angiogenic factors in fulminant hepatic failure (FHF).

METHODS

Serum levels of nine angiogenic factors (angiopoietin-2, follistatin, G-CSF, hepatocyte growth factor [HGF], interleukin-8, leptin, platelet-derived growth factor [PDGF]-BB, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 and VEGF) were measured using the Bio-Plex Protein Array System in 30 patients, 17 of whom were diagnosed with FHF, 13 with acute hepatitis (AH), and 20 controls.

RESULTS

Serum levels of PDGF-BB and VEGF were lower in FHF patients than AH patients and controls (PDGF-BB; 2050±1572 pg/mL vs 4521±2419 pg/mL vs 8506±5500 pg/mL, VEGF; 39±38 pg/mL vs 144±122 pg/mL vs 205±121 pg/mL). By using univariate logistic regression models, serum levels of PDGF-BB and VEGF were associated with poor outcomes. Serum PDGF-BB levels were strongly correlated with serum VEGF levels (r=0.70). Furthermore, serum PDGF-BB levels were significantly correlated with platelet counts (r=0.79), PT activity (r=0.37) and D.Bil/T.Bil ratio (r=0.50), while serum VEGF levels were significantly correlated with platelet counts (r=0.68) and PT activity (r=0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

We consider that serum levels of PDGF-BB and VEGF are worth investigating as biomarkers for predicting outcomes of FHF patients.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in 48 patients with end-stage chronic liver diseases

The only presently viable treatment for end-stage liver disease is whole organ transplantation. However, there are insufficient livers available. The aim of the present study is to provide autologous bone marrow-derived stem cells as a potential therapeutic for patients with end-stage cirrhosis. This is a retrospective chart review of autologous stem cell treatment in 48 patients, 36 with chronic end-stage hepatitis C-induced liver disease and 12 with end-stage autoimmune liver disease. For all patients, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered to mobilize their hematopoietic stem cells. Following leukapheresis, CD34(+) stem cells were isolated, amplified, and partially differentiated in culture, then reinjected into each subject via their hepatic artery or portal vein. Treatment was generally well tolerated with the expected moderate but transient bone pain from G-CSF in less than half of the patients. Three patients had serious treatment-related complications, and only 20.8% of these end-stage liver disease patients died during 12 months of follow up. For all patients there was a statistically significant decrease in ascites. There was clinical and biochemical improvement in a large percentage of patients who received the transplantation. In the viral group, there were marked changes in albumin (p = 0.0003), bilirubin (p = 0.04), INR (p = 0.0003), and ALT levels (p = 0.02). In the autoimmune group, values also improved significantly for albumin (p = 0.001), bilirubin (p = 0.002), INR (p = .0005), and ALT levels (p = 0.003). These results suggest that autologous CD34(+) stem cell transplantation may be safely administered and appears to offer some therapeutic benefit to patients with both viral and autoimmune-induced end-stage liver disease.

G-CSF enhanced SDF-1 gradient between bone marrow and liver associated with mobilization of peripheral blood CD34+ cells in rats with acute liver failure

The role of stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) in modulating massive liver damage is not well known. In this study, expression of SDF-1 in bone marrow and liver was investigated in rats with acute liver failure (ALF) when mobilized using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). ALF was induced in rats by D-galactosamine (D-GalN). Starting after 2 hours following D-GalN induction, the animals were injected with G-CSF 50 microg/kg daily or saline as placebo for 5 days. The percentages of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood and the expression of SDF-1 in bone marrow and liver were then determined. The percentages of peripheral CD34+ cells demonstrated a transient increase in placebo rats following D-GalN induction and a significant increase in rats after G-CSF administration. SDF-1 expression showed a transient decrease in bone marrow and a transient increase in liver tissue from placebo rats. However, a significant decrease of SDF-1 expression in bone marrow and a remarkable increase in liver tissue were observed in animals from the G-CSF group. It was concluded that G-CSF can enhance the reduced expression of SDF-1 in bone marrow and increased expression in liver in ALF rats, forming a greater SDF-1 gradient, and chemoattracting CD34+ cells' migration from bone marrow to an injured liver.

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor induces proliferation of hepatic progenitors in alcoholic steatohepatitis: a randomized trial

Liver failure is the major cause of death in alcoholic steatohepatitis (ASH). In experimental hepatitis, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilizes hematopoietic stem cells, induces liver regeneration, and improves survival. We studied the short-term effects of G-CSF on CD34+ stem cell mobilization, liver cell proliferation, and liver function in patients with ASH. Twenty-four patients (mean age 54 years) with alcoholic cirrhosis [Child-Turcotte-Pugh score 10 (7-12)] and concomitant biopsy-proven ASH [Maddrey score 36 (21-60)] were randomized to standard care associated with 5 days of G-CSF (10 microg/kg/day, group A, n = 13) or standard care alone (group B, n = 11). Serial measurement of CD34+ cells, liver tests, cytokines [hepatocyte growth factor (HGF); tumor necrosis factor alpha; tumor necrosis factor-R1; interleukin-6; alfa-fetoprotein], and (13)C-aminopyrine breath tests were performed. Proliferating hepatic progenitor cells [HPC; double immunostaining (Ki67/cytokeratin 7)], histology, and neutrophils were assessed on baseline and day 7 biopsies. Abstinent alcoholic patients with cirrhosis served as controls for immunohistochemistry. G-CSF was well tolerated. At day 7, both CD34+ cells (+747% versus -6%, P < 0.003), and HGF (+212% versus -7%, P < 0.03) increased in group A but not in group B. Cytokines and aminopyrine breath test changes were similar between groups. On repeat biopsy, a >50% increase in proliferating HPC was more frequent in group A than in group B (11 versus 2, P < 0.003). Changes in Ki67+/cytokeratin 7+ cells correlated with changes in CD34+ cells (r = 0.65, P < 0.03). Neutrophils and histological changes were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

G-CSF mobilizes CD34+ cells, increases HGF, and induces HPC to proliferate within 7 days of administration. Larger trials would be required to determine whether these changes translate into improved liver function.

Stem cell-based therapy in gastroenterology and hepatology

Protagonists of a new scientific era, stem cells are promising tools on which regenerative medicine relies for the treatment of human pathologies. Stem cells can be obtained from various sources, including embryos, fetal tissues, umbilical cord blood, and also terminally differentiated organs. Once forced to expand and differentiate into functional progenies, stem cells may become suitable for cell replacement and tissue engineering. The manipulation and/or stimulation of adult stem cells seems to be particularly promising, as it could improve the endogenous regenerative potential without risks of rejection and overcome the ethical and political issues related to embryonic stem cell research. Stem cells are already leaving the bench and reaching the bedside, despite an incomplete knowledge of the genetic control program driving their fate and plasticity. In gastroenterology and hepatology, the first attempts to translate stem cell basic research into novel therapeutic strategies have been made for the treatment of several disorders, such as inflammatory bowel diseases, diabetes mellitus, celiachy and acute or chronic hepatopaties. Nonetheless, critical aspects need to be further addressed, including the long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of cell-based treatments, as well as their carcinogenic potential. Aim of this review is to summarize the state-of-the-arts on gastrointestinal and hepatic stem cells and on stem cell-based therapies in gastroenterology and hepatology, highlighting both the benefits and the potential risks of these new tools for the treatment and prevention of human diseases.

Synergistic effect of erythropoietin but not G-CSF in combination with curcumin on impaired liver regeneration in rats

INTRODUCTION

The effect of erythropoietin (Epo) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or in combination with the hepatoprotective antioxidant curcumin (Cur) was evaluated in a model of delayed liver regeneration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sprague Dawley rats underwent 70% liver resection with simultaneous cecal ligation and puncture and were randomised to five groups: no treatment, G-CSF (100 microg/kg), Epo (1,000 IU/kg), each alone or in combination with Cur (100mg/kg). Twenty-four hours after surgery, blood and tissue samples were collected. Markers of liver regeneration (liver weight, mitotic index, Ki-67 index), function (bilirubin, bile flow) and hepatocellular damage (liver enzymes, histomorphology) were determined. In addition, cytokine expression and hepatic glutathione concentrations were measured.

RESULTS

Liver regeneration was not improved by G-CSF or Epo monotherapy. Epo more effectively increased liver weight and regeneration markers, but the difference was not significant. Whereas liver regeneration was slightly inhibited in the G-CSF plus Cur group, Epo plus Cur significantly improved liver regeneration. This was accompanied by reduced oxidative stress. Liver function and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines were comparable in all treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

In the present model, Epo, at a relatively low dosage, did not improve liver regeneration. However, the combination of Epo and Cur showed a synergistic effect with highly significant stimulation of liver regeneration.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor impairs liver regeneration in mice through the up-regulation of interleukin-1beta

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Stem cell induction via granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration is utilized in the treatment of various diseases. Therefore, we examined the effect of G-CSF administration to a liver fibrosis model induced by dimethylnitrosamine (DMN).

METHODS

ICR mice were subcutaneously injected with either G-CSF (150microg/kg) or saline at days 0, 3, 7 and 10. Subacute liver injury was established by intraperitoneal injection of DMN (10mg/kg) on three consecutive days of each week.

RESULTS

G-CSF administration significantly decreased the survival rate of mice treated with DMN. There was no difference in the degree of liver injury or fibrosis between either group of mice. However, assessment by proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) revealed that the G-CSF-treated mice experienced a greater degree of inhibition of liver cell proliferation than the control mice. Interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) mRNA expression increased in the livers of G-CSF-treated mice. PCNA staining and analysis of cell cycle-related proteins also revealed that passive immunization with anti-IL-1beta-neutralizing antibody improved the impaired hepatocellular regeneration and resulted in an improved survival rate of mice treated with G-CSF and DMN.

CONCLUSIONS

G-CSF administration suppressed liver cell proliferation through the up-regulation of IL-1beta expression in DMN-induced liver injury.

Safety and efficacy profile of G-CSF therapy in patients with acute on chronic liver failure

BACKGROUND/AIM

We aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment in patients with acute on chronic liver failure and the effect of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on the expression level of CXCR4, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and very late activation antigen 4.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with acute on chronic liver failure were randomised to receive standard therapy, standard therapy+granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (5 microg/kg/day for 6 days) and standard therapy+granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (15 microg/kg/day s.c. for 6 days). Data on CD34+cell mobilisation were compared to age-matched peripheral blood haematopoietic stem cell donors treated with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. On day third of treatment, the expression level of CXCR4, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and very late activation antigen 4 was analysed in mobilised CD34+ cells.

RESULTS

CD34 cell count increased after the second day of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor injection in both treatment groups compared to the linear increase observed in control. After the fifth day the increase was significantly higher in healthy donors versus patients with acute on chronic liver failure. A decrease in the expression of CXCR4, very late activation antigen 4 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor compared to premobilisation values was observed. No major side effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment is able to induce CD34 mobilisation in patients with acute on chronic liver failure. The expression pattern of CXCR4, very late activation antigen 4 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor suggests that these molecules are involved in the granulocyte-colony stimulating factor-induced stem cell mobilisation.

Effects of granulocyte colony stimulating-factor in a rat model of acute liver injury

BACKGROUND/AIM

Controversial experimental observations suggest that granulocyte colony stimulating-factor may promote hepatic regeneration after hepatectomy and chemical injury either by directly stimulating adult liver cells or facilitating the mobilization of bone marrow cells and their homing to the liver. We investigated whether different schedules of granulocyte colony stimulating-factor administration protect against experimental acute liver injury.

METHODS

Acute liver injury was induced in Sprague-Dawley fed rats by injecting a single intraperitoneal dose of carbon tetrachloride. Recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating-factor or vehicle was given daily after intoxication (4 days) or before (7 days) and after carbon tetrachloride administration. Liver injury and regeneration were assessed 2 and 4 days after damage. Bone marrow cells mobilization was evaluated by the white blood cell count and the assessment of circulating clonogenic haematopoietic progenitors (colony forming unit-cells).

RESULTS

In this experimental model, although granulocyte colony stimulating-factor induced the significant mobilization of colony forming unit-cells, the study cytokine had no effect on liver injury (serum alanine amino transaminase level and necrotic index) and liver regeneration (mitotic index and bromodeoxyuridine incorporation), regardless of the administration schedule.

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not support the conclusion that: (1) granulocyte colony stimulating-factor exerts a protective effect against toxic-induced, non-lethal acute liver injury and (2) promotes hepatocyte regeneration.

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor promotes liver repair and induces oval cell migration and proliferation in rats

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hepatic regeneration is a heterogeneous phenomenon involving several cell populations. Oval cells are considered liver stem cells, a portion of which derive from bone marrow (BM). Recent studies have shown that granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) may be effective in facilitating liver repair. However, it remains unclear if G-CSF acts by mobilizing BM cells, or if it acts locally within the liver microenvironment to facilitate the endogenous restoration program. In the present study, we assessed the involvement of G-CSF during oval cell activation.

METHODS

Dipeptidyl-peptidase-IV-deficient female rats received BM transplants from wild-type male donors. Four weeks later, rats were subjected to the 2-acetylaminofluorene/partial hepatectomy model of oval cell-mediated liver regeneration, followed by administration of either nonpegylated G-CSF or pegylated G-CSF. Control animals did not receive further treatments after surgery. The magnitude of oval cell reaction, the entity of BM contribution to liver repopulation, as well as the G-CSF/G-CSF-receptor expression levels were evaluated. In addition, in vitro proliferation and migration assays were performed on freshly isolated oval cells.

RESULTS

Oval cells were found to express G-CSF receptor and G-CSF was produced within the regenerating liver. G-CSF administration significantly increased both the magnitude of the oval cell reaction, and the contribution of BM to liver repair. Finally, G-CSF acted as a chemoattractant and a mitogen for oval cells in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that G-CSF facilitates hepatic regeneration by increasing the migration of BM-derived progenitors to the liver, as well as enhancing the endogenous oval cell reaction.

Serum levels of stem cell factor and thrombopoietin are markedly decreased in fulminant hepatic failure patients with a poor prognosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Hematopoietic growth factors including stem cell factor (SCF), thrombopoietin (TPO) and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) have a potential role in inducing bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells to move into the circulation, and the association of these factors with liver regeneration has received a lot of attention recently. The aim of this study was to determine the serum levels of such factors in patients with acute liver injury.

METHODS

The subjects were 25 patients with acute hepatitis (AH) who had a favorable prognosis and 26 patients with fulminant hepatitis (FH), of whom 11 were alive and 15 had died. Sixty-six healthy subjects matched for age and sex served as controls. Serum samples were collected before treatment, and the levels of SCF, TPO and G-CSF were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbant assays.

RESULTS

The levels of SCF and TPO were significantly lower in FH patients than in AH patients and the controls, and were also significantly lower in the FH patients who died, compared to the surviving patients. The G-CSF levels did not differ among them.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that low serum levels of SCF and TPO may be linked to poor prognosis in patients with severe liver injury.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor supports liver regeneration in a small-for-size liver remnant mouse model

Experimental partial hepatectomy of more than 80% of the liver weight bears an increased mortality in rodents, due to impaired hepatic regeneration in small-for-size liver remnants. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) promotes progenitor cell expansion and mobilization and also has immunomodulatory properties. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of systemically administered G-CSF on liver regeneration and animal survival in a small-for-size liver remnant mouse model. Mice were preconditioned daily for 5 days with subcutaneous injections of 5 microg G-CSF or aqua ad injectabile. Subsequently, 83% partial hepatectomy was performed by resecting the median, the left, the caudate, and the right inferior hepatic lobes in all animals. Daily sham or G-CSF injection was continued. Survival was significantly better in G-CSF-treated animals (P < 0.0001). At 36 and 48 h after microsurgical hepatic resection, markers of hepatic proliferation (Ki67, BrdU) were elevated in G-CSF-treated mice compared to sham injected control animals (P < 0.0001) and dry liver weight was increased (P < 0.05). G-CSF conditioning might prove to be useful in patients with small-for-size liver remnants after extended hepatic resections due to primary or secondary liver tumors or in the setting of split liver transplantation.

Administration of granulocyte colony stimulating factor after liver transplantation leads to an increased incidence and severity of ischemic biliary lesions in the rat model

AIM: Recently it has been reported that granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) can induce hypercoagulability in healthy bone marrow donors. It is conceivable that the induction of a prothrombotic state in a recipient of an organ graft with already impaired perfusion might cause further deterioration in the transplanted organ. This study evaluated whether G-CSF treatment worsens liver perfusion following liver transplantation in the rat model.

METHODS: A non-arterialized rat liver transplantation model was employed to evaluate the effect of G-CSF treatment on the liver in a syngeneic and allogeneic strain combination. Study outcomes included survival time and liver damage as investigated by liver enzymes and liver histology. Observation times were 1 d, 1 wk and 12 wk.

RESULTS: Rats treated with G-CSF had increased incidence and severity of biliary damage following liver transplantation. In these animals, hepatocellular necrosis was accentuated in the centrilobular region. These lesions are indicative of impaired perfusion in G-CSF treated animals.

CONCLUSION: G-CSF should be used with caution in recipients of liver transplantation, as treatment might enhance preexisting, undetected perfusion problems and ultimately lead to ischemia induced biliary complications.

Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Aggravates Rather than Regenerates Emphysematous Lungs in Mice

BACKGROUND

Lung regeneration is an innovative strategy that may cure pulmonary emphysema. The bone marrow (BM) harbors pulmonary stem cells. Hematopoietic cytokine-driven mobilization of BM cells may thus support lung regeneration.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine whether systemic administration of macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) leads to the regeneration of lungs in a murine model of elastase-induced emphysema.

METHODS

C57BL/6J mice were administered elastase intratracheally. Four weeks later, in the absence or presence of elastase treatment, mice were intraperitoneally given either M-CSF or saline on days 1-5 each week for 3 weeks. Lung tissue was harvested 24 h after the last injection.

RESULTS

M-CSF administration without prior elastase did not affect the mean linear intercept, surface area, or surface area/lung volume. In contrast, M-CSF administration following elastase injury caused a greater increase in the mean linear intercept and greater decreases in surface area and surface area/lung volume than saline administration following elastase, indicating that M-CSF aggravated emphysema. This aggravation of emphysema was accompanied by accumulation of pulmonary alveolar macrophages (AMs) expressing metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 and MMP-12. M-CSF stimulated AMs to express MMPs in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that M-CSF administration does not support lung regeneration but rather aggravates the lung destruction associated with elastase injury.

Hematopoietic stem cells mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor partly contribute to liver graft regeneration after partial orthotopic liver transplantation

On the basis of the recently recognized potential of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) to give rise to hepatocytes, we investigated whether HSCs mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or G-CSF per se could contribute to faster recovery and promote tissue reparation after rats' (cross-sex) partial orthotopic liver transplantation (PLTx). Sex-mismatched (female to male) syngeneic rat PLTx was established. The recipients were repeatedly administrated recombinant G-CSF for 5 consecutive days before (G-CSF + PLTx group) and after PLTx (PLTx + G-CSF group). Compared with those in PLTx group, CD34+ cells in peripheral blood and portal tract region increased from day 1 to 7 after transplantation in G-CSF + PLTx group and from day 3 to 14 after transplantation in PLTx + G-CSF group, respectively, which suggested that CD34+ HSCs were mobilized and migrated into liver graft. Compared with that in G-CSF + PLTx and PLTx groups, there was a higher survival rate in the PLTx + G-CSF group. On day 3 after surgery, the level of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase were lower, whereas the mitosis index, proliferating cell nuclear antigen-positive nuclei, bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation, and graft-to-recipient weight ratio were higher in the PLTx + G-CSF group. In contrast, these parameters had no significant difference between G-CSF + PLTx and PLTx groups. To define the origin of proliferating cells reconstituting liver after injury, sry+ (sex-determining region for Y chromosome) and sry+/cytokeratin 19+ (CK19) cells were quantitated. Higher percentage of sry+ and sry+/CK19+ cells in PLTx + G-CSF was detected than in G-CSF + PLTx groups on day 14 after surgery, although the liver engraftment rate still remained rather low. Some of the sry+/CK19+ cells in the portal tract areas were similar to hepatic oval cells/cholangiocytes. In conclusion, G-CSF administration after PLTx greatly improved survival rate and liver regeneration of partial graft, partly by its mobilizing HSCs into the injured liver to differentiate into hepatocytes through hepatic oval cells'/cholangiocytes' engraftment.

Granulocyte colony stimulating factor accelerates regeneration and attenuates injury of partial liver allograft in rats

AIM: To investigate the effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on the rege-neration of partial liver allograft in rats.

METHODS: Rat models with 50% partial liver transplantation (PLTx) were established, followed by administration of either saline or G-CSF for 5 consecutive days. Livers and serum samples were harvested 1 3, 5, 7 and 14 d after PLTx. GRWR (graft-recipient weight ratio) and serum biochemical parameters were calculated or measured, and the expression of PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) was detected by immunohistochemistry (SABC).

RESULTS: As compared with that in control group, the survival rate of liver allograft was significantly higher (90% vs 60%, χ²= 5.03, P < 0.05) in G-CSF groups. Three days after PLTx, liver regeneration reached the peak in both groups. In comparison with those in the controls, GRWR was increased (P < 0.05), and the level of aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were lower (3 d: t = 17.61, P < 0.05; t = 20.16, P < 0.05; 5 d: t = 15.64, P < 0.05; t = 23.08, P < 0.05); the level of albumin (ALB) (3 d: 36.2 ± 4.7 vs 29.5 ± 3.4, P < 0.05; 5 d: 43.2 ± 4.1 vs 33.8 ± 3.9, P < 0.05) and the expression of PCNA (t = 23.08, P < 0.05) were higher 3 and 5 d after PLTx in G-CSF groups.

CONCLUSION: G-CSF can promote the regeneration and alleviate the injury of partial liver allograft in rats.