Retrograde migration of starch in the genital tract of rabbits

Talc and human cancer: a systematic review of the experimental animal and mechanistic evidence

The potential carcinogenicity of talc has been evaluated in many studies in humans and experimental animals published in the scientific literature over the last several decades, with a number of these studies reporting no associations between talc exposure and any type of cancer. In order to fully understand the current state of the science regarding the potential for talc to induce human cancers, we conducted a comprehensive and systematic review of the available experimental animal and mechanistic evidence (in conjunction with a systematic review of the epidemiology evidence in a companion analysis) to evaluate whether it supports talc as being carcinogenic to humans. We considered study quality and its impact on the interpretation of results and evaluated all types of cancer and all exposure routes. We also evaluated the evidence on the potential for talc to migrate in the body to potential tumor sites. We identified seven experimental animal carcinogenicity studies and 11 mechanistic studies of talc to systematically review. We found that several of the experimental animal carcinogenicity studies of talc have limitations that preclude their sensitivity to detect increases in tumor incidence. Regardless, the studies cover multiple exposure routes, species, and exposure durations, and none indicate that talc is a carcinogen in experimental animals except in rats under conditions of extremely high exposure that likely resulted in lung particle overload, a nonspecific effect of high exposures to poorly soluble particles, and not from any carcinogenic properties of talc. Lung particle overload leading to lung tumor formation has only been observed in rats and not in any other species, including humans. The mechanistic studies indicate that talc is not genotoxic or mutagenic, but can induce some effects that could be events on a possible pathway to carcinogenicity, mainly at high exposures or in in vitro studies with exposures of unclear relevance in vivo, but these effects are not consistent across studies and cell types. This systematic review of the experimental animal carcinogenicity and mechanistic evidence for talc indicates that an association between talc exposure and cancer is not expected in humans. Talc carcinogenicity is not plausible in any species except rats, and only when the exposure conditions are high enough to induce lung particle overload, which is not relevant to human exposures.

A critical review of talc and ovarian cancer

The association between perineal talc use and ovarian cancer has been evaluated in several epidemiology studies. Some case-control studies reported weak positive associations, while other case-control and three large prospective cohort investigations found this association to be null. A weight-of-evidence evaluation was conducted of the epidemiology, toxicity, exposure, transport, in vitro, and mechanistic evidence to determine whether, collectively, these data support a causal association. Our review of the literature indicated that, while both case-control and cohort studies may be impacted by bias, the possibility of recall and other biases from the low participation rates and retrospective self-reporting of talc exposure cannot be ruled out for any of the case-control studies. The hypothesis that talc exposure induces ovarian cancer is only supported if one discounts the null results of the cohort studies and the fact that significant bias and/or confounding are likely reasons for the associations reported in some case-control investigations. In addition, one would need to ignore the evidence from animal experiments that show no marked association with cancer, in vitro and genotoxicity studies that did not indicate a carcinogenic mechanism of action for talc, and mechanistic and transport investigations that did not support the retrograde transport of talc to the ovaries. An alternative hypothesis that talc does not produce ovarian cancer, and that bias and confounding contribute the reported positive associations in case-control studies, is better supported by the evidence across all scientific disciplines. It is concluded that the evidence does not support a causal association between perineal talc use and ovarian cancer.

The effect of talc particles on phagocytes in co-culture with ovarian cancer cells

Talc and titanium dioxide are naturally occurring water-insoluble mined products usually available in the form of particulate matter. This study was prompted by epidemiological observations suggesting that perineal use of talc powder is associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer, particularly in a milieu with higher estrogen. We aimed to test the effects of talc vs. control particles on the ability of prototypical macrophage cell lines to curb the growth of ovarian cancer cells in culture in the presence of estrogen. We found that murine ovarian surface epithelial cells (MOSEC), a prototype of certain forms of ovarian cancer, were present in larger numbers after co-culture with macrophages treated to a combination of talc and estradiol than to either agent alone or vehicle. Control particles (titanium dioxide, concentrated urban air particulates or diesel exhaust particles) did not have this effect. Co-exposure of macrophages to talc and estradiol has led to increased production of reactive oxygen species and changes in expression of macrophage genes pertinent in cancer development and immunosurveillance. These findings suggest that in vitro exposure to talc, particularly in a high-estrogen environment, may compromise immunosurveillance functions of macrophages and prompt further studies to elucidate this mechanism.

Safety Assessment of Talc as Used in Cosmetics

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel (Panel) assessed the safety of talc for use in cosmetics. The safety of talc has been the subject of much debate through the years, partly because the relationship between talc and asbestos is commonly misunderstood. Industry specifications state that cosmetic-grade talc must contain no detectable fibrous, asbestos minerals. Therefore, the large amount of available animal and clinical data the Panel relied on in assessing the safety of talc only included those studies on talc that did not contain asbestos. The Panel concluded that talc is safe for use in cosmetics in the present practices of use and concentration (some cosmetic products are entirely composed of talc). Talc should not be applied to the skin when the epidermal barrier is missing or significantly disrupted.

Glove powder reduction and alternative approaches

This article addresses the role of glove powder in facilitating allergic reactions to natural rubber latex (NRL) and to the chemical additives in synthetic and NRL gloves as well as its role in eliciting postsurgical complications. Various dusting powders have been used historically to prevent gloves from sticking to each other and to facilitate donning. All have manifested adverse consequences for health care professionals and patients. Manufacturing methods for powder reduction and elimination are presented. The recently developed ASTM methods for the quantitation of powder on powder-free and powdered gloves are reviewed along with the new ASTM maximum powder limits for all medical gloves. Caution must be exercised when methods of protein and powder reduction are implemented to minimize the possibility of creating other adverse consequences.

Post-operative consequences of glove powder used pre-operatively in the vagina in the rabbit model

This study was undertaken to determine if a retrograde migration of glove powder (Biosorb(TM)) from the vagina into the abdominal cavity in combination with a subsequent intra-abdominal trauma could affect the development of adhesions. A rabbit model was used with one control and one test group. A total of 50 mg Biosorb(TM) was deposited intravaginally in the test cases before ovulation was induced. Three days later a laparotomy with a small standardized surgical trauma was carried out on the left Fallopian tube and the ipsilateral peritoneum. Ten days later the extent of intra-abdominal adhesions was evaluated. The presence of starch particles in cell smears and biopsies was also investigated. Significant differences in the formation of adhesions were found between the control and the test cases (P < 0.001). In the test group there were dense adhesions and in four cases the Fallopian tube was completely attached to the peritoneal wall. In the control cases only loose minor adhesions were found. This study indicates that the number of starch particles migrating from the vagina to the abdominal cavity is sufficient to enhance significantly the formation of post-operative adhesions. We therefore suggest that powder-free medical or surgical gloves should be used in obstetrics and gynaecology.