1
|
Nower L, Blaszczynski A, Anthony WL. Clarifying gambling subtypes: the revised pathways model of problem gambling. Addiction 2022; 117:2000-2008. [PMID: 34792223 PMCID: PMC9299878 DOI: 10.1111/add.15745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The pathways model is a highly cited etiological model of problem gambling. In the past two decades, a number of studies have found support for the model's utility in classifying gambling subtypes. The aims of this paper were to refine empirically the model subtypes and to revise and update the model based on those findings. DESIGN AND MEASUREMENT Observational study using data collected from treatment-seeking problem gamblers using the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) and the Gambling Pathways Questionnaire (GPQ). SETTING Treatment clinics in Canada, Australia and the United States. PARTICIPANTS A convenience sample of 1168 treatment-seeking problem gamblers, aged 18 years or older. FINDINGS Empirically validated risk factors were analyzed using latent class analyses, identifying a three-class solution as the best-fitting model. Those in the largest class (class 1: 44.3%, n = 517) reported the lowest levels of all etiological risk factors. Participants in class 2 (39.5%, n = 461) reported the highest rates of anxiety and depression, both before and after gambling became a problem, as well as childhood maltreatment, and a high level of gambling for stress-coping. Those in class 3 (16.3%, n = 190) reported high levels of impulsivity; risk-taking, including sexual risk-taking; antisocial traits; and coping to provide meaning in life and to alleviate stress. CONCLUSIONS The revised pathways model of problem gambling includes three classes of gamblers similar to the three subtypes in the original pathways model, but class 3 in the revised pathways model is distinct from class 2, showing higher levels of risk-taking and antisocial traits and gambling motivated by a desire for meaning/purpose and/or to alleviate stress. Class 2 in the revised pathways model demonstrates high levels of childhood maltreatment as well as gambling for stress-coping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lia Nower
- Center for Gambling StudiesRutgers University, School of Social WorkNew BrunswickNJUSA
| | - Alex Blaszczynski
- Gambling Research Unit, School of PsychologyUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - Wen Li Anthony
- Center for Gambling StudiesRutgers University, School of Social WorkNew BrunswickNJUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Charting a path towards a public health approach for gambling harm prevention. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG 2021; 29:37-53. [PMID: 33432287 PMCID: PMC7787930 DOI: 10.1007/s10389-020-01437-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Aim Gambling harm is a serious public health issue affecting the health, financial security, and social well-being of millions of people and their close relations around the world. Despite its population health implications, gambling harm is not typically viewed and treated as a public health policy issue. This paper critically reviews the evolution of the public health perspective on gambling harm. It also considers how gambling harm can be operationalized within a public health model. Methods A critical historical review of the emerging public health perspective on gambling harm was conducted. Key documents covering three decades of development were reviewed and appraised through a process of deliberation and debate over source impact in the fields of research, policy, and programming internationally. Results The first decade mainly focused on identifying gambling harm and framing the public health issue. The second decade featured the expansion of health assessment and emerging areas of policy and program development. The third decade saw an increased focus on public health frameworks that advanced understanding of harm mechanics and impact. As reflected by the essential functions of a general public health model, gambling harm prevention efforts emphasize health promotion over other key functions like health assessment and surveillance. Conclusion Gambling harm is a public health issue requiring greater attention to health assessment and surveillance data development.
Collapse
|
3
|
Hilbrecht M, Baxter D, Abbott M, Binde P, Clark L, Hodgins DC, Manitowabi D, Quilty L, SpÅngberg J, Volberg R, Walker D, Williams RJ. The Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling: A revised framework for understanding gambling harm. J Behav Addict 2020; 9:190-205. [PMID: 32554839 PMCID: PMC8939413 DOI: 10.1556/2006.2020.00024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling moves beyond a symptoms-based view of harm and addresses a broad set of factors related to the risks and effects of gambling harmfully at the individual, family, and community levels. Coauthored by international research experts and informed by multiple stakeholders, Gambling Research Exchange (GREO) facilitated the framework development in 2013 and retains responsibility for regular updates and mobilization. This review article presents information about the revised version of the Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling completed in late 2018. METHODS We describe eight interrelated factors depicted in the framework that represent major themes in gambling ranging from the specific (gambling environment, exposure, gambling types, and treatment resources) to the general (cultural, social, psychological, and biological influences). After outlining the framework development and collaborative process, we highlight new topics for the recent update that reflect changes in the gambling landscape and prominent discourses in the scientific community. Some of these topics include social and economic impacts of gambling, and a new model of understanding gambling related harm. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS We address the relevance of the CFHG to the gambling and behavioral addictions research community. Harm-based frameworks have been undertaken in other areas of addiction that can both inform and be informed by a model dedicated to harmful gambling. Further, the framework brings a multi-disciplinary perspective to bear on antecedents and factors that co-occur with harmful gambling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margo Hilbrecht
- Gambling Research Exchange, Guelph, ON, Canada,Deptartment of Recreation & Leisure Studies, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada,Corresponding author. Gambling Research Exchange, 55 Wyndham St. N., Suite 204A, Guelph, ON, N1H 7T8, Canada E-mail: . Tel.: +1 519 763 8049, x101
| | | | - Max Abbott
- Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Per Binde
- School of Global Studies, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Luke Clark
- Centre for Gambling Research at UBC, Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - David C. Hodgins
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Darrel Manitowabi
- School of Northern and Community Studies, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - Lena Quilty
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Rachel Volberg
- School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Douglas Walker
- Department of Economics, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Robert J. Williams
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|