1
|
Aarons GA, Sklar M, Ehrhart MG, Roesch S, Moullin JC, Carandang K. Randomized trial of the leadership and organizational change for implementation (LOCI) strategy in substance use treatment clinics. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTION TREATMENT 2024; 165:209437. [PMID: 38866139 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 04/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation represents a strategic change that requires alignment of leadership and support throughout organizations. Leadership and Organizational Change for Implementation (LOCI) is a multifaceted implementation strategy that aims to improve implementation leadership and climate within organizations through iterative cycles of leadership and climate assessment and feedback, leadership training and coaching, and strategic planning with upper-level leaders. This study tested the effects of LOCI on transformational and implementation leadership, implementation climate, implementation citizenship behavior, and EBP reach. METHODS A multiple cohort, cluster randomized trial tests the effect of LOCI in 60 clinics across nine behavioral health organizations in California and Arizona, USA. The study randomized clinics within organizations to either LOCI or a leadership training webinar control condition in three consecutive cohorts. Repeated web-based surveys of direct service providers (nLOCI = 201, nControl = 179) assessed leadership, implementation climate, and implementation citizenship over time. Multilevel autoregressive modeling was the primary statistical analysis such that providers (level-1) were nested within clinics (level-2). The study predicted between-condition differences at 4-, 8-, and 12-month follow-up assessments. Provider engagement in a fidelity monitoring process assessed reach of motivational interviewing (i.e., number of sessions recorded/submitted for fidelity coding). An independent sample t-test explored between condition differences in motivational interviewing reach. RESULTS Results indicated between condition differences at 4 months for implementation leadership, implementation climate, and implementation citizenship behavior such that greater improvements were evidenced in the LOCI condition compared to the control condition. Reach of MI was significantly greater in the LOCI vs control condition such that LOCI providers were significantly more likely to engage in the fidelity monitoring process (chi-square (1, n = 370) = 5.59, p = .018). CONCLUSIONS LOCI was developed based on organizational theories of strategic leadership and climate to affect organizational change processes that communicate that innovation implementation is expected, supported, and recognized as a value of the organization. The LOCI implementation strategy resulted in more positive hypothesized outcomes compared to the control condition. Organizational change strategies have utility for implementing health innovations in complex, multilevel contexts and for greater sustainment of facilitative leader behaviors, strategic implementation climate, and improved implementation outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov gov (NCT03042832, 2 February 2017; retrospectively registered).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory A Aarons
- University of California San Diego, Department of Psychiatry, 9500 Gilman Drive (0812), La Jolla, CA 92093-0812, United States of America; UC San Diego Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute Dissemination and Implementation Science Center, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States of America; Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, 3665 Kearny Villa Rd., Suite 200N, San Diego, CA 92123, United States of America.
| | - Marisa Sklar
- University of California San Diego, Department of Psychiatry, 9500 Gilman Drive (0812), La Jolla, CA 92093-0812, United States of America; UC San Diego Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute Dissemination and Implementation Science Center, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States of America; Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, 3665 Kearny Villa Rd., Suite 200N, San Diego, CA 92123, United States of America.
| | - Mark G Ehrhart
- University of Central Florida, Department of Psychology, United States of America.
| | - Scott Roesch
- San Diego State University, Department of Psychology, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182-4611, United States of America.
| | - Joanna C Moullin
- Curtin University, School of Population Health, Kent Street, Bentley, Western Australia 6102, Australia
| | - Kristine Carandang
- University of California San Diego, Department of Psychiatry, 9500 Gilman Drive (0812), La Jolla, CA 92093-0812, United States of America; Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, 3665 Kearny Villa Rd., Suite 200N, San Diego, CA 92123, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Simes D, Shochet I, Murray K, Gill DJ. Practice-based insights from specialized clinicians into youth suicide risk assessment and psychotherapy: A qualitative study. Psychother Res 2024; 34:972-990. [PMID: 37748115 DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2023.2253360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: The experience of frontline clinicians is an underutilized source of knowledge about improving youth suicide intervention. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of highly experienced, specialized mental health clinicians on the practical application of risk assessment, stabilization, and treatment and their experience of working in this practice area.Method: Data were collected from seven focus groups with 28 clinicians and analyzed using consensual qualitative research methods.Results: Four domains emerged, describing 1) youth suicide intervention as relationally focused and attachment-informed, 2) the need for flexible and tailored care balancing individual and family intervention in the context of family complexity and fractured relationships, 3) a nuanced, therapeutic approach to managing the complexity and uncertainty of adolescent suicide risk, and 4) working in youth suicide intervention as emotionally demanding and facilitated or hampered by the organizational and systems context.Conclusion: The importance of harnessing family systems and attachment-informed approaches to alliance, risk assessment, and treatment was emphasized, along with the parallel need for systemic clinician support and consideration of the potential negative consequences of administrative and risk management protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Simes
- School of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
- New South Wales Health, Australia
| | - Ian Shochet
- School of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kate Murray
- School of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fortney JC, Curran GM, Lyon AR, Check DK, Flum DR. Similarities and Differences Between Pragmatic Trials and Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trials. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:1735-1743. [PMID: 38627320 PMCID: PMC11254859 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08747-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
Pragmatism in clinical trials is focused on increasing the generalizability of research findings for routine clinical care settings. Hybridism in clinical trials (i.e., assessing both clinical effectiveness and implementation success) is focused on speeding up the process by which evidence-based practices are developed and adopted into routine clinical care. Even though pragmatic trial methodologies and implementation science evolved from very different disciplines, Pragmatic Trials and Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trials share many similar design features. In fact, these types of trials can easily be conflated, creating the potential for investigators to mislabel their trial type or mistakenly use the wrong trial type to answer their research question. Blurred boundaries between trial types can hamper the evaluation of grant applications, the scientific interpretation of findings, and policy-making. Acknowledging that most trials are not pure Pragmatic Trials nor pure Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trials, there are key differences in these trial types and they answer very different research questions. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the similarities and differences of these trial types for funders, researchers, and policy-makers. In addition, recommendations are offered to help investigators choose, label, and operationalize the most appropriate trial type to answer their research question. These recommendations complement existing reporting guidelines for clinical effectiveness trials (TIDieR) and implementation trials (StaRI).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John C Fortney
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Systems Research, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Geoffrey M Curran
- College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Aaron R Lyon
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Devon K Check
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David R Flum
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lyon AR, Liu FF, Connors EH, King KM, Coifman JI, Cook H, McRee E, Ludwig K, Law A, Dorsey S, McCauley E. How low can you go? Examining the effects of brief online training and post-training consultation dose on implementation mechanisms and outcomes for measurement-based care. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:79. [PMID: 35869500 PMCID: PMC9306246 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00325-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Initial training and ongoing post-training consultation (i.e., ongoing support following training, provided by an expert) are among the most common implementation strategies used to change clinician practice. However, extant research has not experimentally investigated the optimal dosages of consultation necessary to produce desired outcomes. Moreover, the degree to which training and consultation engage theoretical implementation mechanisms-such as provider knowledge, skills, and attitudes-is not well understood. This study examined the effects of a brief online training and varying dosages of post-training consultation (BOLT+PTC) on implementation mechanisms and outcomes for measurement-based care (MBC) practices delivered in the context of education sector mental health services. METHODS A national sample of 75 clinicians who provide mental health interventions to children and adolescents in schools were randomly assigned to BOLT+PTC or control (services as usual). Those in BOLT+PTC were further randomized to 2-, 4-, or 8-week consultation conditions. Self-reported MBC knowledge, skills, attitudes, and use (including standardized assessment, individualized assessment, and assessment-informed treatment modification) were collected for 32 weeks. Multilevel models were used to examine main effects of BOLT+PTC versus control on MBC use at the end of consultation and over time, as well as comparisons among PTC dosage conditions and theorized mechanisms (skills, attitudes, knowledge). RESULTS There was a significant linear effect of BOLT+PTC over time on standardized assessment use (b = .02, p < .01), and a significant quadratic effect of BOLT+PTC over time on individualized assessment use (b = .04, p < .001), but no significant effect on treatment modification. BOLT + any level of PTC resulted in higher MBC knowledge and larger growth in MBC skill over the intervention period as compared to control. PTC dosage levels were inconsistently predictive of outcomes, providing no clear evidence for added benefit of higher PTC dosage. CONCLUSIONS Online training and consultation in MBC had effects on standardized and individualized assessment use among clinicians as compared to services as usual with no consistent benefit detected for increased consultation dosage. Continued research investigating optimal dosages and mechanisms of these established implementation strategies is needed to ensure training and consultation resources are deployed efficiently to impact clinician practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05041517 . Retrospectively registered on 10 September 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron R. Lyon
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| | - Freda F. Liu
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| | - Elizabeth H. Connors
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, 389 Whitney Avenue, Office 106, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
| | - Kevin M. King
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Guthrie Hall, Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Jessica I. Coifman
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| | - Heather Cook
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| | - Erin McRee
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| | - Kristy Ludwig
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| | - Amy Law
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Graduate Medical Education, University of Washington, Learning Gateway, Box 358220, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
| | - Shannon Dorsey
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Guthrie Hall, Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Elizabeth McCauley
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dabkowski E, Porter JE. An exploration into suicide prevention initiatives for mental health nurses: A systematic literature review. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2021; 30:610-623. [PMID: 33856744 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Mental health and suicide prevention are national health priorities in Australia, with research currently focussed towards the ZERO Suicide (ZS) initiative. The aim of this review was to evaluate the impact of suicide prevention programmes, in particular the ZS prevention initiative. A systematic review using the PRISMA guidelines was conducted using six EBSCO Host databases; Academic Search Complete, Australian/New Zealand Reference Centre, CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, and APA Psyc Articles. The data extracted from the eligible papers were analysed using a thematic approach. The final data set consisted of fourteen (n = 14) peer-reviewed articles meeting the eligibility criteria, which included quantitative (n = 10), mixed methods (n = 2), and qualitative studies (n = 2). Results indicated variances between suicide prevention programmes with some papers examining single workshops and others assessing multimodal, organizational interventions. Five major themes were produced from this review including measuring the success of suicide prevention programmes, improvements to the delivery of suicide prevention programmes, barriers to implementing changes, cultural considerations, and further research required for suicide prevention programmes. This review concludes that further long-term research is required to evaluate the implementation and efficacy of suicide prevention programmes in health care. Cultural awareness in suicide prevention training is another area that may benefit from further research. A growing body of evidence establishes the need for multimodal and organizational approaches for suicide prevention initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elissa Dabkowski
- Collaborative Evaluation Unit, School of Health, Federation University Australia, Churchill, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joanne E Porter
- Collaborative Evaluation Unit, School of Health, Federation University Australia, Churchill, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dillon CB, Saab MM, Meehan E, Goodwin MJ, Murphy M, Heffernan MS, Greaney MS, Kilty C, Hartigan I, Chambers D, Twomey U, Horgan A. Staff awareness of suicide and self-harm risk in healthcare settings: A mixed-methods systematic review. J Affect Disord 2020; 276:898-906. [PMID: 32739708 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Suicide risk screening in healthcare settings plays a significant role in suicide prevention. Healthcare staff who are poorly informed about self-harm and suicide risk are less likely to identify and subsequently screen at-risk individuals. This mixed-method systematic review aimed to appraise and synthesise evidence from studies that explored and promoted healthcare staff's knowledge and awareness of suicide and self-harm risk in healthcare settings. METHODS Electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, APA PsycARTICLES, Psychology and behavioural Science Collection, ERIC, and SocINDEX), the Cochrane Library, and various grey literature databases were searched for relevant studies. The level of evidence and methodological quality of the included studies were assessed. RESULTS Eighteen empirical studies were included. Levels of knowledge about suicide and self-harm risk varied significantly across the reviewed studies. Face-to-face group training and educational programmes, digital or online educational programmes, and an educational poster campaign were amongst the strategies used to promote awareness of suicide and self-harm risk, with the majority marginally succeeding in doing so. LIMITATIONS The reviewed studies were heterogeneous in terms of design, interventions, and outcome measures which made it difficult to make comparisons. The overall level of scientific evidence was classified as being relatively low. The lack of blinding and lack of a control group were amongst the limitations for experimental studies. CONCLUSIONS Long-term, routine face-to-face group training programmes should be established to educate healthcare staff about suicide risk across all professions and in specific patient groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina B Dillon
- Environmental Research Institute/School of Public Health, University College Cork, Ireland.
| | - Mohamad M Saab
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Ireland
| | - Elaine Meehan
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Ireland
| | - Mr John Goodwin
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Ireland
| | - Margaret Murphy
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Ireland
| | | | | | - Caroline Kilty
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Ireland
| | - Irene Hartigan
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Ireland
| | | | - Una Twomey
- Health Service Executive Southern Area, Ireland
| | - Aine Horgan
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|