A prospective economic evaluation of basiliximab (Simulect) therapy following renal transplantation

Efficacy and safety of basiliximab as initial immunosuppression in liver transplantation: A single center study

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

The interleukin-2 receptor antagonist; basiliximab is used to allow delayed introduction of Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) after liver transplantation and thus delay their renal insult. However, there is only little evidence for the safety and the efficacy of this regimen. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of basiliximab induction in liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 89 patients who were classified into two groups: standard triple immunosuppression (IS) regimen of steroid, tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n = 47) and induction IS regimen of basiliximab, low dose steroids and MMF with delayed introduction of CNI (n = 42). All patients were followed after liver transplantation for at least six months or until death.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patient survival, graft dysfunction, infection rate or type, or wound healing between both groups. The acute rejection rate was equivalent in both groups. Renal dysfunction in the first six months post-transplant was less in the basiliximab group in comparison to the other group (7.1% and 19.1% respectively).

CONCLUSION

Basiliximab-induced IS protocol is a safe regimen that reduces medium-term renal dysfunction and achieves similar survival without increasing the acute rejection or infection rate in liver transplantation recipients.

A call for transplant stewardship: The need for expanded evidence-based evaluation of induction and biologic-based cost-saving strategies in kidney transplantation and beyond

Rising expenditures threaten healthcare sustainability. While transplant programs are typically considered profitable, transplant medications are expensive and frequently targeted for cost savings. This review aims to summarize available literature supporting cost-containment strategies used in solid organ transplant. Despite widespread use of these tactics, we found the available evidence to be fairly low quality. Strategies mainly focus on induction, particularly rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG), given its significant cost and the lack of consensus surrounding dosing. While there is higher-quality evidence for high single-dose rATG, and dose-rounding protocols to reduce waste are likely low risk, more aggressive strategies, such as dosing rATG by CD3+ target-attainment or on ideal-body-weight, have less robust support and did not always attain similar efficacy outcomes. Extrapolation of induction dosing strategies to rejection treatment is not supported by any currently available literature. Cost-saving strategies for supportive therapies, such as IVIG and rituximab also have minimal literature support. Deferral of high-cost agents to the outpatient arena is associated with minimal risk and increases reimbursement, although may increase complexity and cost-burden for patients and infusion centers. The available evidence highlights the need for evaluation of unique patient-specific clinical scenarios and optimization of therapies, rather than simple blanket application of cost-saving initiatives in the transplant population.

Basiliximab: efficacy and safety evaluation in kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Basiliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha chain of interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R). When administered intravenously at a dosage of 20 mg at the time of transplantation and 4 days later, basiliximab saturates the alpha chain of IL-2R for 4 weeks.

AREAS COVERED

This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of basiliximab in kidney transplantation. Randomized controlled trials showed that basiliximab can significantly reduce the incidence of acute rejection without increasing the risk of adverse events. When compared with other antibodies used for induction, basiliximab showed efficacy and safety profiles similar to daclizumab, another monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha chain of IL-2R. In comparison with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulins (rATG), basiliximab showed a similar efficacy. However, in patients at higher risk of rejection, rATG proved to be more effective. No serious safety problems related to basiliximab have been reported.

EXPERT OPINION

There is a solid evidence that basiliximab can significantly decrease the risk of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients without increasing adverse events. This can allow decreased dosage or avoidance of glucocorticoids and reduced dosage of calcineurin inhibitors. On the basis of efficacy, tolerability, ease of administration, and cost effectiveness, basiliximab may be considered the drug of choice for the prophylaxis of acute rejection in standard renal transplant recipients.

Selection of induction therapy in kidney transplantation

Currently available immunosuppressive agents can be classified into three categories: induction agents, maintenance therapy, and treatment for rejection. This review article will focus on induction immunosuppression. There are three antibodies which are used for induction therapy: the lymphocyte-depleting agents - anti-thymocyte globulin and alemtuzumab, and basiliximab which is nondepleting. Historically, immunosuppressant selection was solely based on efficacy for prevention of rejection. In the current era of transplantation, it is now common practice in the transplant community to select induction therapy on the basis of risk-benefit considerations for each patient. This article will focus on the efficacy of available induction agents and the selection of induction agent based on donor and recipient risk factors.

The role of basiliximab in the evolving renal transplantation immunosuppression protocol

Basiliximab is a chimeric mouse-human monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha chain of the interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor on activated T lymphocytes. It was shown in phase III trials to reduce the number and severity of acute rejection episodes in the first year following renal transplantation in adults and children, with a reasonable cost-benefit ratio. The drug does not increase the incidence of opportunistic infections or malignancies above baseline in patients treated with conventional calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression. In the field of renal transplantation, basiliximab does not increase kidney or patient survival, despite the reduction in the number of rejection episodes. Basiliximab may reduce the incidence of delayed graft function. In comparison with lymphocyte-depleting antibodies basiliximab appears to have equal efficacy in standard immunological risk patients. Recently, IL-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies have been used with the objective of reducing or eliminating the more toxic elements of the standard immunosuppression protocol. Several trials have incorporated basiliximab in protocols designed to avoid or withdraw rapidly corticosteroids, as well as protocols which substitute target-of-rapamycin (TOR) inhibitors for calcineurin inhibitors.

Induction treatment with monoclonal antibodies for heart transplantation

Individualization of induction therapy for heart transplantation (HT) is needed, given that only patients at significant risk for fatal rejection seem to present a favorable risk-benefit ratio. The question whether monoclonal interleukin 2 antagonists or antilymphocyte antibodies should be recommended remains unanswered. As most studies suggest that they have similar efficacy in preventing acute rejection, other variables related to safety or management costs should be taken into account. The cytokine release syndrome, associated with the use of OKT3, complicates management of HT patient. The experience in our center with 2 consecutive cohorts, treated with basiliximab (BAS) and OKT3, respectively, suggests that the use of BAS is associated, in addition to similar immunosuppressive efficacy and better safety profile than OKT3, with simpler patient management during the initial hospital stay, which could be associated with a reduction in posttransplant costs. Because few centers continue to use OKT3 as induction therapy in HT, more studies comparing cost-effectiveness of BAS vs polyclonal antilymphocyte antibodies (ATG) are needed.

Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (IL2Ra) are used as induction therapy for prophylaxis against acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Use of IL2Ra has increased steadily since their introduction, but the proportion of new transplant recipients receiving IL2Ra differs around the globe, with 27% of new kidney transplant recipients in the United States, and 70% in Australasia receiving IL2Ra in 2007.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically identify and summarise the effects of using an IL2Ra, as an addition to standard therapy, or as an alternative to another immunosuppressive induction strategy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify new records, and authors of included reports were contacted for clarification where necessary.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in all languages comparing IL2Ra to placebo, no treatment, other IL2Ra or other antibody therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted and assessed independently by two authors, with differences resolved by discussion. Dichotomous outcomes are reported as relative risk (RR) and continuous outcomes as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 71 studies (306 reports, 10,537 participants). Where IL2Ra were compared with placebo (32 studies; 5,784 patients) graft loss including death with a functioning graft was reduced by 25% at six months (16 studies: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.98) and one year (24 studies: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.90), but not beyond this. At one year biopsy-proven acute rejection was reduced by 28% (14 studies: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.81), and there was a 19% reduction in CMV disease (13 studies: RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.97). There was a 64% reduction in early malignancy within six months (8 studies: RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.86), and creatinine was lower (7 studies: MD -8.18 micromol/L 95% CI -14.28 to -2.09) but these differences were not sustained.When IL2Ra were compared to ATG (16 studies, 2211 participants), there was no difference in graft loss at any time point, or for acute rejection diagnosed clinically, but the was benefit of ATG therapy over IL2Ra for biopsy-proven acute rejection at one year (8 studies:, RR 1.30 95% CI 1.01 to 1.67), but at the cost of a 75% increase in malignancy (7 studies: RR 0.25 95% CI 0.07 to 0.87) and a 32% increase in CMV disease (13 studies: RR 0.68 95% CI 0.50 to 0.93). Serum creatinine was significantly lower for IL2Ra treated patients at six months (4 studies: MD -11.20 micromol/L 95% CI -19.94 to -2.09). ATG patients experienced significantly more fever, cytokine release syndrome and other adverse reactions to drug administration and more leucopenia but not thrombocytopenia. There were no significant differences in outcomes according to cyclosporine or tacrolimus use, azathioprine or mycophenolate, or to the study populations baseline risk for acute rejection. There was no evidence that effects were different according to whether equine or rabbit ATG was used.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Given a 38% risk of rejection, per 100 recipients compared with no treatment, nine recipients would need treatment with IL2Ra to prevent one recipient having rejection, 42 to prevent one graft loss, and 38 to prevent one having CMV disease over the first year post-transplantation. Compared with ATG treatment, ATG may prevent some experiencing acute rejection, but 16 recipients would need IL2Ra to prevent one having CMV, but 58 would need IL2Ra to prevent one having malignancy. There are no apparent differences between basiliximab and daclizumab. IL2Ra are as effective as other antibody therapies and with significantly fewer side effects.

The role of basiliximab induction therapy in organ transplantation

Basiliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to the alpha-subunit (CD25) of IL-2 receptors on the surface of activated T lymphocytes, and is a highly effective prophylaxis agent against rejection in organ transplant recipients. Its pharmacokinetic profile is characterized by a biphasic and slow clearance with long terminal half-life and a volume of distribution within the central compartment and outside the circulatory system. Basiliximab induction demonstrated an excellent safety profile, with no increase in the incidence of malignancy, infections or death. It has also been used effectively in high-risk recipients, steroid-sparing and steroid-minimization protocols, and in post-transplant patients with renal dysfunction who would benefit from delayed introduction of calcineurin inhibitors. Basiliximab induction therapy given at days 0 and 4 after transplantation appears to be safe and cost-effective for immunoprophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients, specifically in kidney and liver transplantation, when given in conjunction with dual or triple immunosuppressive therapy.

Interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction in modern immunosuppression regimens for renal transplant recipients

Addition of interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA) induction to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based regimens reduces biopsy-proven acute rejection by 30-40%. IL-2RA induction facilitates early withdrawal of steroids, and supports the safe use of reduced-exposure CNI or delayed CNI introduction. IL-2RAs and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin) show comparable efficacy in patients at standard or low immunologic risk, but the adverse event profiles of lymphocyte-depleting agents are less favorable. IL-2RAs, uniquely, provide effective immunosuppression with similar tolerability to placebo.

Screening to prevent polyoma virus nephropathy: a medical decision analysis

Polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) is an emerging medical dilemma in kidney transplantation. Methods to screen before clinical disease are available and early immunosuppression reduction may change the natural history of progression. However, the consequences of an increase in rejection may limit the benefits. In a simulation model a 'screen' versus 'no-screen' strategy was compared. Baseline PVN cumulative incidence was assumed to be 4%. Patients with PVN were modeled to have 4-fold higher risk of graft loss. In the screen strategy, patients positive for blood DNA PCR had their immunosuppression reduced. This pre-emptive change was modeled to reduce progression to overt PVN by 80%. Therapy reduction was associated with a 10% risk of precipitating acute rejection and greater risk of chronic allograft loss. In the baseline case, screening saved 1912 dollars (discounted) and produced 0.020 more quality adjusted life years (QALYs) than not screening. Screening resulted in decreased net QALYs if the false positive viremia rate was >9.5% and the PVN incidence was <2.1%. Much of the cost savings of screening relate to savings from immunosuppression reduction in the screened arm. Screening may well be cost-effective if not cost saving in centers with high PVN rates. There remain significant areas of uncertainty.

Efficacy and safety of basiliximab in kidney transplantation

The efficacy and safety of basiliximab, in combination with different maintenance regimens, are extensively addressed in the available literature. Basiliximab reduces the incidence of acute rejection, allows a safe reduction of steroid dosage, and is associated with economic savings, although there is substantially no proof that basiliximab prolongs either patient or graft survival. Initial basiliximab administration entails a low-risk and is associated with fewer adverse events than T cell depleting agents. However, life-threatening reactions were reported following re-exposure to basiliximab in recipients who lost graft function early after transplantation and, therefore, discontinued all immunosuppressive agents.

Cost-minimization study comparing Simulect vs. Thymoglobulin in renal transplant induction

PURPOSE

Based on the data of clinical trial CHI-F-02 comparing the efficacy and safety of basiliximab (Simulect) vs. anti-thymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin) in renal transplant induction, we carried out an economic evaluation.

METHOD

This pharmacoeconomic study was a cost-minimization study, i.e. given the equivalent efficacy of the products, the strategy that minimized the cost of care was considered better. The cost of care was analyzed from the hospital perspective.

MATERIAL

This 'piggyback' study of 100 patients estimated the direct medical costs incurred over 6 months of use of two strategies for renal transplant induction therapy. Direct medical costs are those of utilized medical resources: medications, hospital stays, dialysis, and physician visits and investigations not scheduled in the protocol.

RESULTS

In the Simulect arm, significant reductions were found in the initial hospital stay duration and number of infectious episodes. Therefore, although the average cost of treatment was slightly higher with Simulect) than with Thymoglobulin (2964 vs. 2298 Euros), the cost of the initial hospitalization was significantly lower in the Simulect arm (10 907 vs. 11 967 Euros; p = 0.02). Furthermore the mean cost of infectious episodes was significantly lower in the Simulect arm (1056 vs. 1790 Euros, p = 0.03). Cytomegalovirus infection accounted for a significantly smaller proportion of this cost in the Simulect arm than in the Thymoglobulin arm (30% vs. 53%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study showed direct medical cost savings of 1159 Euros per patient in the Simulect arm, which more than compensated for the higher price of this immunosuppressive drug.

Resource use and treatment costs after kidney transplantation: impact of demographic factors, comorbidities, and complications

BACKGROUND

Our goal was to quantify outcomes, resource use, and treatment costs for the first 2 years after renal transplantation in a "real-life" European setting and to assess the impact of preoperative risk factors and postoperative complications on treatment costs.

METHODS

Inpatient and outpatient records of all patients who received a renal transplant at Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany, between January 1998 and July 2000, were evaluated. Key clinical events were recorded. Direct costs were calculated for primary hospitalization, the remainder of year 1, and year 2 after transplantation. Cost of organ procurement, pretransplant care, and transplant surgery were excluded. Cost consequences for key clinical events were determined.

RESULTS

Of 204 patients undergoing transplantation, 195 and 149 completed 1 year and 2 years of follow-up, respectively. The outcomes of years 1 and 2, respectively, were as follows: graft failure, 5.4%, 0.7%; acute rejection, 35.9%, 5.4%; cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, 29.2%, 2.0%; and delayed graft function, 30.9%. Costs for primary hospitalization, the remainder of year 1, and year 2 averaged Euro 15,380, Euro 18,636, and Euro 14,484, respectively. Cost-driving events included graft failure Euro 36,228), acute rejection (Euro 9,638), delayed graft function (Euro7,359), and CMV infection (Euro 4,149). Graft failure and acute rejection for year 1 also added significantly to the costs for year 2.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that posttransplant clinical outcomes result in a significant increase in treatment costs. Because the economic impact of primary causes of chronic rejection (acute rejection and CMV) and delayed graft function is substantial, careful selection of the most appropriate immunosuppressive regimen is essential.

Basiliximab in association with tacrolimus and steroids in caucasian cadaveric renal transplanted patients: significant decrease in early acute rejection rate and hospitalization time

Safety and tolerability of basiliximab in renal transplantation have been proven in different immunosuppressive regimens. Few informations are available about the association of basiliximab with tacrolimus and steroids. We present a retrospective analysis performed in Caucasian cadaveric renal transplant recipients, comparing a basiliximab, tacrolimus and steroids induction protocol (GrA: 51 patients) with a tacrolimus and steroids protocol (GrB: 46 patients). A significant decrease in acute rejection rate in the first 3 months (2.0% vs. 17.4%; p < 0.01) was noted. Interestingly, the recipients in GrA were at major immunologic risk for the younger age of recipients, the greater number of mismatches and the higher rate of second transplants. The hospitalization times resulted reduced of 5.3 d in GrA vs. GrB (20.8 d vs. 26.1 d; p < 0.05). The adverse events patterns and profiles were similar in the two treatments groups. One patient in each group had a post-transplant lymphoprolipherative disorder. No significant difference was found in patient and graft survival. According to the results of this study, in a Caucasian adult population, basiliximab in association with tacrolimus and steroids is a safe and efficacious tool for acute rejection prevention and it is cost saving by reducing the hospitalization times.

Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (IL2Ra) are used as induction therapy for prophylaxis against acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Use of IL2Ra has increased steadily, with 38% of new kidney transplant recipients in the United States, and 23% in Australasia receiving IL2Ra in 2002.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to systematically identify and summarise the effects of using an IL2Ra, as an addition to standard therapy, or as an alternative to other antibody therapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register (June 2003), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (in The Cochrane Library issue 3, 2002), MEDLINE (1966-November 2002) and EMBASE (1980-November 2002). Reference lists and abstracts of conference proceedings and scientific meetings were hand-searched from 1998-2003. Trial groups, authors of included reports and drug manufacturers were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in all languages comparing IL2Ra to placebo, no treatment, other IL2Ra or other antibody therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted and quality assessed independently by two reviewers, with differences resolved by discussion. Dichotomous outcomes are reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred and seventeen reports from 38 trials involving 4893 participants were included. Where IL2Ra were compared with placebo (17 trials; 2786 patients), graft loss was not significantly different at one (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.04) or three years (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.22). Acute rejection (AR) was significantly reduced at six months (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.74) and at one year (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.75). At one year, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.03) and malignancy (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.36) were not significantly different. Where IL2Ra were compared with other antibody therapy no significant differences in treatment effects were demonstrated, but adverse effects strongly favoured IL2Ra.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Given a 40% risk of rejection, seven patients would need treatment with IL2Ra to prevent one patient having rejection, with no definite improvement in graft or patient survival. There is no apparent difference between basiliximab and daclizumab. IL2Ra are as effective as other antibody therapies and with significantly fewer side effects

Basiliximab: efficacy and tolerability in adults and children

An open, single arm, prospective clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of basiliximab (Simulect) combined with cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral), steroids, and azathioprine was performed in four centers in Chile, two adult and two pediatric. The 23 patients who were enrolled were followed for 12 months. There were four acute rejection episodes (three adults and one child) and three graft losses (two adults and one child) during the study. Renal function in both adult and pediatric patients at 6 and 12 months was good. Basiliximab was well tolerated. The incidence of infections was low, with only one CMV infection. There were no deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of acute rejection episodes among renal allograft recipients treated with basiliximab is low, showing that the drug is well tolerated. In particular the number of CMV infections is extremely low.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of basixilimab induction and calcineurin-sparing protocols in "old to old" programs using Markov models

INTRODUCTION

Markov models are employed in economic analyses to evaluate all possible expectations in a dilemna. The introduction of a new clinical protocol (basiliximab induction with calcineurin-sparing protocols) for a group of kidney transplant recipients receiving organs from marginal donors was validated with a Markov simulation model.

HYPOTHESIS

Calcineurin-sparing protocols using anti-IL-2/antibody induction (Simulect) show a beneficial effect on initial kidney function, reducing transplantation costs reception based upon mean length of stay, mean admission cost, and incidences of delayed graft function and complications during the first month after transplant.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A Markov simulation model was established following three different chains. A calcineurin-free regimen with basiliximab induction (chain A), a calcineurin-sparing protocol with basiliximab induction (chain B), and a conventional immunosuppressive regimen (chain C). After designing the Markov chain and cohorts, 31 patients from the "old to old" program were assigned to each chain eight to chain A, (eight to chain B, and 15 to chain C). A month after transplantation a cost-benefit study was performed guided by the three branches of the Markov model.

RESULTS

The Markov model showed a benefit of induction therapies in elderly patients. A cost-benefit model showed that after a month there was a clear benefit from Calcineurin=free plus basiliximab induction therapies, with a slight benefit from calcineurin-sparing protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Markov models are extremely useful when introducing new clinical therapies. In our transplant program, a cost-effective analysis of outcomes in old patients using the Markov model showed a clear benefit of calcineurin-sparing protocols with basixilimab induction.

Lack of economic benefit with basiliximab induction in living related donor adult renal transplant recipients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of basiliximab (BAS) induction therapy on acute rejection rates and overall costs in adult living related donor (LRD) renal transplant recipients. Design. Retrospective chart review and cost-effectiveness analysis of the first 12 months after transplantation.

SETTING

University hospital and outpatient renal transplant clinic.

PATIENTS

Sixty consecutive adult LRD renal transplant recipients.

INTERVENTION

The treatment group received BAS 20 mg intravenously on postoperative days 0 and 4. The control group received no induction agents. Both groups received cyclosporine microemulsion, azathioprine, and corticosteroids for maintenance immunosuppression.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Six patients (three in each group) were excluded; three had received muromonab-CD3 as an induction agent and three were lost to follow-up. At 12-months, the frequency of acute rejection episodes was 15% (4/27) in the control group and 22% (6/27) in the BAS group (NS). Renal function, as measured by average serum creatinine level, was similar at months 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 for both groups. The frequency of infectious complications was similar in both groups. No adverse effects were associated with BAS. Mean initial hospitalization charges were dollar 51,970.01 and dollar 68,093.90 in the control and BAS groups, respectively (p < 0.05). The control group had more readmissions (18 vs 14 in the BAS group), but the average charge/readmission was lower (dollar 10,148.50 vs dollar 21,952.58 in the BAS group; NS). All costs were adjusted to 2000 dollars (US).

CONCLUSION

Basiliximab induction therapy did not provide clear clinical efficacy benefit or prove to be cost-effective compared with no induction in LRD recipients.

Economic implications of the use of basiliximab in addition to triple immunosuppressive therapy in renal allograft recipients: a UK perspective

OBJECTIVE

To compare resource use and costs in renal transplant recipients treated with basiliximab or placebo plus triple immunosuppressive therapy.

DESIGN

International randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial; economic evaluation undertaken alongside the efficacy trial. The economic evaluation was performed from a UK National Health Service hospital perspective.

SETTING

31 centres in 12 countries.

PARTICIPANTS

345 renal transplant recipients were enrolled; 340 were randomised (basiliximab 168; placebo 172) and included in the intention-to-treat analysis.

INTERVENTION

Treatment with placebo or basiliximab (20mg intravenous bolus) on day 0 and day 4 after transplantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Resource utilisation in multiple categories and treatment costs for basiliximab and placebo-treated patients during the 6-month post-transplantation period.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found in any of the economically important categories of resource use or in the mean cost of treatment per person across the whole trial. The mean cost of treatment, including the cost of basiliximab, was pound 16 095 for basiliximab recipients and pound 15 864 (1997/1998 costs) for placebo recipients, a mean difference of pound 231 (95% CI: - pound 1983 to pound 2446), which was not significant. Basiliximab treatment led to a significant reduction in acute rejection episodes (basiliximab 20.8%; placebo 34.9%; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Basiliximab therapy confers a significant clinical benefit to renal transplant recipients without increasing overall treatment costs.

Basiliximab

Basiliximab (Simulect), a chimeric (human/murine) monoclonal antibody, is indicated for the prevention of acute organ rejection in adult and paediatric renal transplant recipients in combination with other immunosuppressive agents. Basiliximab significantly reduced acute rejection compared with placebo in renal transplant recipients receiving dual- (cyclosporin microemulsion and corticosteroids) or triple-immunotherapy (azathioprine- or mycophenolate mofetil-based); graft and patient survival rates at 12 months were similar. Significantly more basiliximab than placebo recipients were free from the combined endpoint of death, graft loss or acute rejection 3 years, but not 5 years, after transplantation. The incidence of adverse events was similar in basiliximab and placebo recipients, with no increase in the incidence of infection, including cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Malignancies or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders after treatment with basiliximab were rare, with a similar incidence to that seen with placebo at 12 months or 5 years post-transplantation. Rare cases of hypersensitivity reactions to basiliximab have been reported. The efficacy of basiliximab was similar to that of equine antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and daclizumab, and similar to or greater than that of muromonab CD3. Basiliximab was as effective as rabbit antithymocyte globulin (RATG) in patients at relatively low risk of acute rejection, but less effective in high-risk patients. Numerically or significantly fewer patients receiving basiliximab experienced adverse events considered to be related to the study drug than ATG or RATG recipients. The incidence of infection, including CMV infection, was similar with basiliximab and ATG or RATG. Basiliximab plus baseline immunosuppression resulted in no significant differences in acute rejection rates compared with baseline immunosuppression with or without ATG or antilymphocyte globulin in retrospective analyses conducted for small numbers of paediatric patients. Limited data from paediatric renal transplant recipients suggest a similar tolerability profile to that in adults. Basiliximab appears to allow the withdrawal of corticosteroids or the use of corticosteroid-free or calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens in renal transplant recipients. Basiliximab did not increase the overall costs of therapy in pharmacoeconomic studies.

CONCLUSION

Basiliximab reduces acute rejection without increasing the incidence of adverse events, including infection and malignancy, in renal transplant recipients when combined with standard dual- or triple-immunotherapy. The overall incidence of death, graft loss or acute rejection was significantly reduced at 3 years; there was no significant difference for this endpoint 5 years after transplantation. Malignancy was not increased at 5 years. The overall efficacy, tolerability, ease of administration and cost effectiveness of basiliximab make it an attractive option for the prophylaxis of acute renal transplant rejection.

The use of basiliximab in solid organ transplantation

The risk of acute rejection is at its highest early post-transplant. The use of various antibodies early after transplant achieves potent immunosuppression to prevent acute rejection, allowing the clinician the opportunity to optimise baseline immunosuppressive management and to delay the use of nephrotoxic agents (calcineurin inhibitors), while the graft reaches a baseline function. Basiliximab (Simulect trade mark, Novartis) is a monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the alpha-subunit of the human high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2r) complex, consequently inhibiting interleukin-2 (IL-2) binding. IL-2 receptors are selectively expressed on the surface of the activated lymphocytes. Administration of basiliximab inhibits IL-2 mediated activation of lymphocytes, a critical pathway involved in allograft rejection. Several clinical studies have shown that basiliximab administration as an induction agent significantly reduces the incidence of acute rejection, even in high risk patients. In addition, basiliximab is well-tolerated with minimal side effects.

Urinary tract infections after renal transplantation

Up to now one of the major problems for successful organ transplantation has been the reaction of the immune system of the recipient against the donor organ. This could lead to acute and chronic rejection, and in cases of unsuccessful treatment to the loss of the transplant. In organ graft recipients, immunosuppressive agents are used to prevent or treat rejection episodes and to maintain graft function. Although there is an increasing number of immunosuppressive substances, the immunosuppressive therapy currently in use is relatively unspecific and targets many immunological functions. The net state of immunosuppression is a complex function determined by the interaction of a number of factors, the most important of these are the dose, duration and temporal sequence in which immunosuppressive drugs are employed. Any kind of immunosuppressive protocol is thus associated with an increased infection rate. This has an important socioecological impact, because frequent hospitalizations resulting from infectious complications are necessary, having an overall mortality rate of 3.5% within 2 weeks of admission. The most common cause of septicaemia is urinary tract infection. Frequent urinary tract infections are associated with the early onset of chronic rejection, suggesting a pathogenetic relationship between these two features. The occurrence of chronic rejection has led to reduced transplant survival. The prevention of urinary tract infections, or the early diagnosis and accurate treatment of urinary tract infections is important in renal transplant recipients.

Therapeutic antibody expression technology

With the technological advances made during the past decade, antibodies now represent an important and growing class of biotherapeutics. With the potential new targets resulting from genomics and with methods now in place to make fully human antibodies, the potential of antibodies as valuable therapeutics in oncology, inflammation and cardiovascular disease can be fully realised. Systems to produce these antibodies as full-length molecules and as fragments include expression in both mammalian and bacterial cells grown in bioreactors and in transgenic organisms. Factors including molecular fidelity and the cost of goods are critical in evaluating expression systems. Mammalian cell culture and transgenic organisms show the greatest promise for the expression of full-length, recombinant human antibodies, and bacterial fermentation seems most favorable for the expression of antibody fragments.