Fluvastatin reduces atherogenic lipids without any effect on native endothelial function early after kidney transplantation

Cardiovascular Outcomes in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus and Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor or Standard Triple Therapy: 24-month Post Hoc Analysis From TRANSFORM Study

BACKGROUND

The comparative impact of everolimus (EVR)-based regimens versus standard of care (mycophenolic acid+standard calcineurin inhibitor [MPA+sCNI]) on cardiovascular outcomes in de novo kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is poorly understood. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in KTRs receiving EVR+reduced CNI (rCNI) or MPA+sCNI from the TRANSplant eFficacy and safety Outcomes with an eveRolimus-based regiMen study was evaluated.

METHODS

The incidence of MACE was determined for all randomized patients receiving at least 1 dose of the study drug. Factors associated with MACEs were determined by logistic regression. Risk of MACE out to 3 y post-study was calculated using the Patient Outcome in Renal Transplantation equation.

RESULTS

MACE occurred in 81 of 1014 (8.0%; EVR+rCNI) versus 89 of 1012 (8.8%; MPA+sCNI) KTRs (risk ratio, 0.91 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-1.21]). The incidence of circulatory death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, or angina was similar between the arms. Incidence of MACE was similar between EVR+rCNI and MPA+sCNI arms with a higher incidence in prespecified risk groups: older age, pretransplant diabetes (15.1% versus 15.9%), statin use (8.5% versus 10.8%), and low estimated glomerular filtration rate (Month 2 estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 versus >60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ; odds ratio, 2.23 [95% CI, 1.02-4.86]; P = 0.044), respectively. Predicted risk of MACE within 3 y of follow-up did not differ between the treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality were similar between de novo KTRs receiving EVR+rCNI and MPA+sCNI. EVR+rCNI is a viable alternative to the current standard of care in KTRs.

HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have higher risks of cardiovascular disease compared to the general population. Specifically, cardiovascular deaths account most deaths in kidney transplant recipients. Statins are a potentially beneficial intervention for kidney transplant patients given their established benefits in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease in the general population. This is an update of a review first published in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the benefits (reductions in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction and stroke, and progression of CKD to requiring dialysis) and harms (muscle or liver dysfunction, withdrawal, cancer) of statins compared to placebo, no treatment, standard care, or another statin in adults with CKD who have a functioning kidney transplant.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to 29 February 2012 through contact with the Trials Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared the effects of statins with placebo, no treatment, standard care, or statins on mortality, cardiovascular events, kidney function and toxicity in kidney transplant recipients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Treatment effects were expressed as mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes (lipids, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), proteinuria) and relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes (major cardiovascular events, mortality, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal or non-fatal stroke, elevated muscle or liver enzymes, withdrawal due to adverse events, cancer, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), acute allograft rejection) together with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 22 studies (3465 participants); 17 studies (3282 participants) compared statin with placebo or no treatment, and five studies (183 participants) compared two different statin regimens.From data generally derived from a single high-quality study, it was found that statins may reduce major cardiovascular events (1 study, 2102 participants: RR 0.84, CI 0.66 to 1.06), cardiovascular mortality (4 studies, 2322 participants: RR 0.68, CI 0.45 to 1.01), and fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction (1 study, 2102 participants: RR 0.70, CI 0.48 to 1.01); although effect estimates lack precision and include the possibility of no effect.Statins had uncertain effects on all-cause mortality (6 studies, 2760 participants: RR 1.08, CI 0.63 to 1.83); fatal or non-fatal stroke (1 study, 2102 participants: RR 1.18, CI 0.85 to 1.63); creatine kinase elevation (3 studies, 2233 participants: RR 0.86, CI 0.39 to 1.89); liver enzyme elevation (4 studies, 608 participants: RR 0.62, CI 0.33 to 1.19); withdrawal due to adverse events (9 studies, 2810 participants: RR 0.89, CI 0.74 to 1.06); and cancer (1 study, 2094 participants: RR 0.94, CI 0.82 to 1.07).Statins significantly reduced serum total cholesterol (12 studies, 3070 participants: MD -42.43 mg/dL, CI -51.22 to -33.65); low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (11 studies, 3004 participants: MD -43.19 mg/dL, CI -52.59 to -33.78); serum triglycerides (11 studies, 3012 participants: MD -27.28 mg/dL, CI -34.29 to -20.27); and lowered high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (11 studies, 3005 participants: MD -5.69 mg/dL, CI -10.35 to -1.03).Statins had uncertain effects on kidney function: ESKD (6 studies, 2740 participants: RR 1.14, CI 0.94 to 1.37); proteinuria (2 studies, 136 participants: MD -0.04 g/24 h, CI -0.17 to 0.25); acute allograft rejection (4 studies, 582 participants: RR 0.88, CI 0.61 to 1.28); and GFR (1 study, 62 participants: MD -1.00 mL/min, CI -9.96 to 7.96).Due to heterogeneity in comparisons, data directly comparing differing statin regimens could not be meta-analysed. Evidence for statins in people who have had a kidney transplant were sparse and lower quality due to imprecise effect estimates and provided limited systematic evaluation of treatment harm.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Statins may reduce cardiovascular events in kidney transplant recipients, although treatment effects are imprecise. Statin treatment has uncertain effects on overall mortality, stroke, kidney function, and toxicity outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. Additional studies would improve our confidence in the treatment benefits and harms of statins on cardiovascular events in this clinical setting.

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus: statins not associated with improved patient or graft survival

Background

The beneficial effects of early statin use in kidney transplant recipients, especially those on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, are not well established. We evaluated the predictors of statin use following kidney transplantation and examined its association with patient and allograft survival.

Methods

We examined 615 consecutive patients who underwent kidney transplant at our institution between January 1998 and January 2002. Statin use was assessed at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following kidney transplant. Patients were followed for allograft and patient survival.

Results

36% of the 615 kidney transplant recipients were treated with statin treatment. Statin use increased over the course of the study period. Older age, elevated body mass index, higher triglyceride levels, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, history of myocardial infarction were associated with higher rates of statin use; elevated alkaline phosphatase levels and CMV IgG seropositivity were associated with less statin use. Older age, elevated BMI and hypercholesterolemia remained significant predictors of increased statin use after accounting for covariates using multiple regression. The early use of statins was not associated with improvements in unadjusted patient survival [HR 0.99; 95%CI 0.72-1.37] or graft survival [HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.76-1.24]. The risks of death and graft survival were not consistently reduced with exposure to statin using either adjusted models or propensity scores in Cox Proportional Hazards models.

Conclusions

In a kidney transplant population primarily receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, early statin use was not associated with significantly improved graft or patient survival.

HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular deaths account for the majority of deaths in kidney transplant recipients and dyslipidaemia contributes significantly to their cardiovascular disease. Statins are widely used in kidney transplant patients given their established benefits in the general population, however evidence favouring their use is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of statin therapy on mortality and renal outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and hand searched reference lists of articles and scientific proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing statins with placebo, no treatment or other statins in kidney transplant recipients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model after testing for heterogeneity. Results were expressed as mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes (lipid parameters) and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes (mortality, allograft rejection, liver enzymes, occurrence of rhabdomyolysis and study withdrawal) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen studies (3229 patients) comparing statins versus placebo (15) or another statin (1) were included. Compared to placebo, statins did not decrease all-cause mortality (14 studies: RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.54 to 3.12). Point estimates favoured statins in terms of cardiovascular mortality (13 studies: RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.03) and non-fatal cardiovascular events (1 study: RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.01), however the results were not statistically significant. Compared to placebo, the use of statins was associated with a significantly lower end of treatment average total cholesterol (10 studies: MD -42.33 mg/dL (1.26 mmol/L), 95% CI -53.02 to -31.64), LDL cholesterol (10 studies: MD -46.15 mg/dL (1.19 mmol/L), 95% CI -55.97 to -36.33) and triglycerides (10 studies: MD -25.46 mg/dL (0.26 mmol/L), 95% CI -33.95 to 16.9). There was no significant difference in the risk of acute rejection (5 studies: RR 0.61; 95% C.I.0.32 to 1.16.) No data on chronic rejection was available and no major toxicity was noted.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Statins significantly reduced hyperlipidaemia and tended to reduce cardiovascular events in kidney transplant recipients, but no effect has yet been demonstrated for mortality outcomes. Most of the data was derived from one large long-term study. Considering the significant impact of statins on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the general and predialysis populations, more studies are needed in kidney transplant patients.

Association between insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Endothelial dysfunction is a common finding in renal transplant recipients (RTR) and is related to impaired local regulation of vasodilative and vasoconstrictive substances, such as nitric monoxide (NO) and endothelin-1 (ET-1). In non-transplanted patients, an association between impaired endothelial function and insulin resistance has been shown. Whether such an association also exists in RTR is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to examine whether insulin resistance is associated with endothelial dysfunction in RTR.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 47 RTR in a stable phase six yr post-transplant were included in the statistical analysis. The immunosuppressive therapy was based on cyclosporine and prednisolone. Non-invasive assessment of endothelial function was performed with laser Doppler flowmetry of the forearm skin vasculature after local acetylcholine stimulation. Oral glucose tolerance tests comprising both glucose and insulin measurements were used to calculate insulin sensitivity (IS) indices. NO, ET-1 and von Willebrand factor were measured in fasting plasma samples.

RESULTS

Normal glucose tolerance was found in 31 RTR. In these subjects, both IS (r(2) = 0.164, p = 0.044) and plasma NO (r(2) = 0.326, p = 0.002) were significantly correlated with endothelial function. Patients with glucose intolerance (n = 16) had higher plasma ET-1 and lower NO levels, but the association between IS and endothelial function was not significant in these subjects. In the total patient cohort, IS and endothelial function tended to be correlated (p = 0.127).

CONCLUSIONS

Endothelial dysfunction is significantly associated with insulin resistance in normoglycemic RTR but explains a rather small part of the variation. In glucose-intolerant recipients, IS appears to be more critically dependent on other factors not revealed in the present study.

Fluvastatin in the treatment of dyslipidemia associated with chronic kidney failure and renal transplantation

Premature atherosclerotic coronary heart disease driven by multiple risk factors is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among the 6 million patients in the United States with chronic renal failure. Consensus is that kidney failure and renal transplantation patients should be treated aggressively for dyslipidemia. Major medical literature databases were searched for published information about fluvastatin, a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, used in patients with impaired renal function. This article characterizes the dyslipidemia observed in these clinical settings and reviews the clinical experience with fluvastatin.

Fluvastatin and fluvastatin extended release: a clinical and safety profile

Cardiovascular diseases due to atherosclerosis are the leading causes of mortality in the Western world. Cholesterol-lowering therapy with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme Areductase inhibitors (statins) has demonstrated a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in diverse populations. Fluvastatin (Lescol, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) was the first totally synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor on the market and has recently become available in an extended-release formulation (Lescol XL, Novartis Pharmaceuticals). Data from several clinical outcome trials have shown substantial benefits from fluvastatin treatment in diverse populations. Fluvastatin exists primarily in its acid form and as inactive metabolites in vivo, while active metabolites as well as the lactone form are only present in small amounts. The demonstration of the safe use of fluvastatin in a wide range of patients may be associated with the predominant acid form of the drug in vivo, as well as its predominant metabolism via the cytochrome P450 2C9 pathway.

Statin use after renal transplantation: a systematic quality review of trial-based evidence

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy reduces cardiovascular risk in the general population and may modulate rejection in solid organ transplant recipients. We assessed whether current clinical evidence supports the use of statins to improve cardiac and/or renal outcomes after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of randomized, controlled intervention trials of statins among renal allograft recipients. Clinical trials published between January 1, 1993 and January 1, 2004 were identified by systematic search of electronic databases. Eligible studies measured the impact of therapy on acute allograft rejection, surrogates of cardiovascular risk and/or cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We abstracted descriptive summaries of trial design elements and primary effect estimates, and assessed trial quality with a standardized quality evaluation tool.

RESULTS

Thirteen eligible trials were identified. Statin therapy was associated with less acute allograft rejection in two early studies but was ineffective in three subsequent, larger trials. Therapeutic benefit was also seen in six of seven small studies that evaluated cardiovascular risk surrogates. Statin use did not significantly alter the primary composite outcome in a single large cardiac events trial, but was associated with reductions in secondary end-points of cardiac death analysed alone or with myocardial infarction. Important design distinctions included statin preparation and dose, concomitant interventions, study power and randomization methods. Median total quality scores were 52 for the rejection trials, 41 for the studies of cardiovascular risk surrogates and 69 for the cardiac events trial, and showed a trend towards variation by outcome measure (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Heterogeneous study designs and methodological quality contribute to discrepant conclusions on the benefit of statin therapy to renal allograft recipients. Trial-based clinical evidence does not support the use of statins to lower acute rejection risk after kidney transplantation, but does indicate effectiveness for improvement in cardiovascular risk markers and possibly for reduction of clinical cardiac events.