Cellular methods used to evaluate the immune response in transplantation

Activation-induced CD137 is a fast assay for identification and multi-parameter flow cytometric analysis of alloreactive T cells

Detection and isolation of viable alloreactive T cells at the single-cell level requires a cell surface marker induced specifically upon T cell receptor activation. In this study, a member of the tumour necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-family, CD137 (4-1BB) was investigated for its potential to identify the total pool of circulating alloreactive T cells. Optimal conditions for sensitive and specific detection of allogeneic-induced CD137 expression on circulating T cells were established. Thereafter, CD137(+) alloreactive T cells were phenotypically and functionally characterized by multi-parameter flow cytometry. Alloantigen-induced CD137 expression identified both alloreactive CD8(+) T cells (mean ± standard error of the mean: 0·21 ± 0·07%) and alloreactive CD4(+) T cells (0·21 ± 0·05%). CD137(+) alloreactive T cells were detected in different T cell subsets, including naive T cells, but were found preferentially in CD28(+) T cells and not in the terminally differentiated T cell subset. Upon allogeneic (re-)stimulation, the cytokine-producing as well as proliferative capacity of T cells resided mainly within the CD137-expressing fraction. About 10% of the CD137(+) alloreactive T cells produced any combination of interferon (IFN)-γ, interleukin (IL)-2 and TNF-α. Polyfunctional alloreactive T cells, defined by multiple cytokine expression, were observed infrequently. In conclusion, activation-induced CD137 expression is a fast assay allowing for detection and functional analysis of the total alloreactive T cell compartment at the single-cell level by multi-parameter flow cytometry.

Immunologic monitoring in kidney transplant recipients

Transplant biopsy has always been the gold standard for assessing the immune response to a kidney allograft (Chandraker A: Diagnostic techniques in the work-up of renal allograft dysfunction-an update. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 8:723-728, 1999). A biopsy is not without risk and is unable to predict rejection and is only diagnostic once rejection has already occurred. However, in the past two decades, we have seen an expansion in assays that can potentially put an end to the "drug level" era, which until now has been one of the few tools available to clinicians for monitoring the immune response. A better understanding of the mechanisms of rejection and tolerance, and technological advances has led to the development of new noninvasive methods to monitor the immune response. In this article, we discuss these new methods and their potential uses in renal transplant recipients.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: recent developments

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) continues to limit the long-term success of cardiac transplantation. Recent insights have underscored the fact that innate and adaptive immune responses are involved in the pathogenesis of CAV. Vascular lesions are the result of cumulative endothelial injuries induced both by alloimmune responses and by nonspecific insults (including ischemia-reperfusion injury, viral infections, and metabolic disorders) in the context of impaired repair mechanisms. Intravascular ultrasound is the most sensitive method for detection of CAV, and progressive intimal thickening in the first posttransplant year identifies patients at high risk for future cardiovascular events. Encouraging results with regard to the detection of CAV by noninvasive methods should be an incentive to apply routine noninvasive imaging during mid- to long-term follow-up. Improved immunosuppressive drugs, including mycophenolate mofetil and proliferation signal inhibitors, as well as statins (in part via immunomodulation), have beneficial effects on CAV progression, although there is still a need to confirm the impact of vasodilators in improving outcome after heart transplantation. Coronary revascularization for CAV is only palliative, with no long-term survival benefit. Three main strategies for CAV prevention are currently under investigation: inhibition of growth factors and cytokines, cell therapy, and tolerance induction. However, because individual responses to an allograft change over time, assays to monitor the recipient's immune response and individualized methods for therapeutic immune modulation are clearly needed.

A novel flow assay for the detection of cytokine secreting alloreactive T cells: application to immune monitoring

The direct and indirect allorecognition pathways play an important role in graft rejection. We hypothesized that the presence of alloreactive memory T cells in the recipient's circulation increases the risk of rejection after transplantation. The objective of this study was to develop a noninvasive, immune monitoring tool that simultaneously measures donor-specific responses via both the direct and indirect recognition pathways. Our laboratory developed a whole blood flow cytometric cytokine secretion assay to identify interferon (IFN)-gamma secreting memory T cells in whole blood of renal transplant patients. The assay readily detected IFN-gamma producing CD3+ T cells in response to recall antigens tetanus toxoid, purified protein derivative, and alloantigens in whole blood from healthy controls. Analysis of sequential posttransplant blood samples from 19 renal allograft recipients showed that alloimmune responses were higher in transplant recipients who had undergone acute rejection than in those without acute rejection episodes. In addition, patients showing increased creatinine levels 3 months after transplantation were more likely to exhibit alloimmune responses than recipients with stable graft function. The flow cytokine secretion assay provides a reliable and simple method for identification of patients at risk of acute rejection and early graft dysfunction.

HLA-Specific antibodies are associated with high-grade and persistent-recurrent lung allograft acute rejection

BACKGROUND

The impact of HLA-specific antibodies is not well established in the acute rejection of lung allografts. Acute rejection represents the most important risk factor for the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

METHODS

We analyzed the pattern of HLA antibodies before and after transplantation in 54 patients, and correlated our data with the presence and frequency of high-grade and persistent-recurrent acute rejection, during the first 18 post-operative months. The diagnosis of acute rejection was based on histologic International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT)-published criteria.

RESULTS

Ten of 54 patients had a positive enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) post-transplantation. In 90% of ELISA-positive patients, the presence of HLA antibodies was associated with persistent-recurrent acute rejections, compared with 34% in the ELISA-negative group (p < 0.005). There were 28 high-grade acute rejection episodes in the ELISA-positive group, compared with 36 in the ELISA-negative group (p < 0.0001). The ELISA-positive patients required a greater intensity of immunosuppressive therapy. The patients with ELISA-detected anti-HLA antibodies were at least 3-fold more likely to develop high-grade acute rejection and persistent-recurrent acute rejection, and 7-fold more likely to develop multiple episodes of persistent-recurrent acute rejection, compared with ELISA-negative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

ELISA-based screening for the development of HLA antibodies is a reliable method that can identify lung transplant recipients at increased risk for high-grade and persistent-recurrent acute rejection. Although bronchiolitis obliterans appears as a point of no return in the evolution of lung-transplanted patients, early detection of risk factors for acute rejection could indirectly decrease the incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans. These lung-transplanted patients may benefit from an altered strategy of immunosuppression.

Induction of acute graft-versus-host disease by T cells that do not respond toin vitroalloantigen stimulation

The mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) has been used extensively to measure alloreactive T cells. In clinical practice, a negative MLR of recipient T cells responding to donor cells does not necessarily mean that a donor-specific tolerance has been established. This discrepancy indicates that the presently used methods fail to demonstrate the full repertoire of alloreactive T cells. This could be the result of the fact that some alloreactive T cells do not respond in vitro but will mount a response towards alloantigens in vivo, or that some alloreactive T cells do not respond during the MLR but will respond later if the alloantigen stimulation remains. We therefore examined the non-proliferating T-cell population in a mouse primary alloreactive response. Spleen and lymph node cells derived from C57BL/6J (H-2(b)) mice were stained with carboxy-fluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester and injected intravenously into C.B-17 severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice (H-2(d)). The donor cells were recovered 5 d after the injection. The non-proliferating T cells were sorted and were non-reactive to alloantigen stimulation in vitro. Nevertheless, these non-proliferating T cells could proliferate and cause acute graft-versus-host disease after being adoptively transferred to secondary recipients of SCID mice. These results suggest that there exists an alloreactive T-cell population that does not respond to in vitro alloantigen stimulation but can mount a delayed alloresponse in vivo.

High expression of ILT3 and ILT4 is a general feature of tolerogenic dendritic cells

The direct interaction between antigen specific CD8(+) CD28(-) T suppressor cells (T(S)) with dendritic cells (DC) results in the tolerization of DC by inducing the upregulation of immunologlobulin like transcript 3 (ILT3) and ILT4. We show here that such tolerogenic DC anergize alloreactive CD4(+) CD45RO(+) CD25(+) T cells converting them into regulatory T cells (T(R)), which in turn, continue the cascade of suppression by tolerizing other DC. Interleukin 10 (IL-10) and interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) also induce ILT3 and ILT4 upregulation in DC, rendering them tolerogenic. This implies a common mechanism of DC-mediated suppression. This finding and the observation that in organ allograft recipients quiescence is associated with the presence in the circulation of donor-specific T(S) and T(R) emphasize the importance of the cross talk between tolerogenic DC and T cells in suppression of the immune response.