Pretransplant varicella vaccination is cost-effective in pediatric renal transplantation

Intravenous immunoglobulin in kidney transplantation: Mechanisms of action, clinical applications, adverse effects, and hyperimmune globulin

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been developed for over 40 years. The mechanisms of action of IVIG are complex and diverse, and there may be multiple mechanisms that combine to influence it. IVIG has been used in kidney transplantation for desensitization, treatment of antibody-mediated rejection, and ABO-incompatible transplantation. and treatment or prevention of some infectious diseases. Hyperimmune globulins such as cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin (CMV-IG) and hepatitis B hyperimmune globulin (HBIG) have also been used to protect against cytomegalovirus and hepatitis B virus, respectively. However, IVIG is also associated with some rare but serious adverse effects and some application risks, and clinicians need to weigh the pros and cons and develop individualized treatment programs to benefit more patients. This review will provide an overview of the multiple mechanisms of action, clinical applications, adverse effects, and prophylactic measures of IVIG, and hyperimmune globulin will also be introduced in it.

Systematic review of economic evaluations of varicella vaccination programmes

OBJECTIVES

This study carried out a systematic literature review of economic evaluations of varicella vaccination programmes from the earliest publication to the present day, including programmes in the workplace and in special risk groups as well as universal childhood vaccination and catch up programmes.

METHODS

Articles published from 1985 until 2022 were sourced from PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, NHSEED and Econlit. Eligible economic evaluations, which included posters and conference abstracts, were identified by two reviewers who scrutinised each other's selections at both title and abstract and full report stages. The studies are described in terms of their methodological characteristics. Their results are aggregated by type of vaccination programme and the nature of the economic outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 2575 articles were identified of which 79 qualified as economic evaluations. A total of 55 studies focused on universal childhood vaccination, 10 on the workplace and 14 on high risk groups. Twenty-seven studies reported estimates of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, 16 reported benefit-cost ratios, 20 reported cost-effectiveness outcomes in terms of incremental cost per event or life saved and 16 reported cost-cost offset results. Most studies of universal childhood vaccination reported an increase in overall costs to health services, but often a reduction in cost from a societal perspective.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence surrounding the cost-effectiveness of varicella vaccination programmes remains sparse with contrasting conclusions in some areas. Future research should particularly aim to encompass the impact of universal childhood vaccination programmes on herpes zoster among adults.

Immunization of Solid Organ Transplant Candidates and Recipients: A 2018 Update

This article discusses the recommended vaccines used before and after solid organ transplant period, including data regarding vaccine safety and efficacy and travel-related vaccines. Vaccination is an important part of the preparation for solid organ transplantation, because vaccine-preventable diseases contribute to the morbidity and mortality of these patients. A pretransplantation protocol should be encouraged in every transplant center. The main goal of vaccination is to provide seroprotection before transplantation, because iatrogenically immunosuppressed patients posttransplant have a lower seroresponse to vaccines.

An update on immunizations before and after transplantation in the pediatric solid organ transplant recipient

Vaccination offers a unique opportunity to decrease the burden of infectious complications following solid organ transplantation. In this paper we review the current guidelines for routine immunizations before and after solid organ transplantation, including the recent updates and changes to recommendations for certain vaccines. We also address the issue of waning immunity in solid organ transplant recipients and discuss the current data on vaccinating this patient population with live vaccines after transplantation.

Post-transplant infections: An ounce of prevention

Infections are the leading cause of hospitalization in transplant recipients. The increased risk of new onset diabetes after transplantation, cardiovascular disease, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders adversely affects allograft outcomes. Risk is determined by epidemiologic exposure, immunosuppressive therapy and prophylaxis. The predictable sequence of appearance of infections helps in making management decisions. High likelihood of infections with unusual and multiple organisms necessitates aggressive use of imaging techniques and invasive procedures. Serologic tests depend upon antibody response and are unreliable. Nucleic acid based assays are sensitive, rapid, and allow detection of subclinical infection and assessment of response to therapy. Preventive steps include screening of donors and recipients and vaccination. All indicated vaccines should be administered before transplantation. Inactivated vaccines can be administered after transplantation but produce weak and transient antibody response. Boosters may be required once antibody titers wane. Post-transplant chemoprophylaxis includes cotrimoxazole for preventing urinary tract infections, pneumocystis and Nocardia infections; ganciclovir, valganciclovir, or acyclovir for cytomegalovirus related complications in at-risk recipients; and lamivudine for prevention of progressive liver disease in HBsAg positive recipients. Viral load monitoring and pre-emptive treatment is used for BK virus infection. Infection with new organisms has recently been reported, mostly due to inadvertent transmission via the donor organ.

Aciclovir and varicella-zoster-immunoglobulin in solid-organ transplant recipients

Clear recommendations for the management of acute varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infections for cases of significant exposure and the use of prophylactic drugs after solid-organ transplantation are missing due to the lack of evidence by prospective studies. Heterogeneity in patient groups, patient numbers, age groups, immunosuppressive regimens, timing, and dosage of aciclovir and/or varicella-zoster immunoglobulin (VZIG), pre-transplant vaccination or VZV wild-type infection and inconsistency of data make comparability of different studies impossible. Although the benefit of aciclovir and/or VZIG is uncertain in immunosuppressed children, prospective controlled double-blind studies are not feasible for ethical considerations as fatal cases with disseminating varicella disease are well known in these patient groups despite the use of aciclovir and/or VZIG, whereas severe side-effects of these drugs are rare. However, a reporting bias is likely as mainly severe or fatal cases might have been predominantly published or cases of successfully used aciclovir and/or VZIG in mild cases or in cases of breakthrough infections after vaccination. As neither VZIG prophylaxis nor treatment with intravenous aciclovir offers complete protection against severe VZV infection to immunosuppressed pediatric solid-organ transplant recipients, high priority should be given to vaccination against VZV prior to transplantation, and, most importantly, in their close contact persons. Clinical observations suggest that only assessment of humoral immunity together with cellular immunity may allow predication about protection in exposed patients.

Prevention and treatment of infectious complications after solid organ transplantation in children

Effective prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases after transplantation are key factors contributing to the success of organ transplantation. Most transplant patients experience different kinds of infections during the first year after transplantation. Children are at particular risk of developing some types of infections by virtue of lack of immunity although they may be at risk for other types due the effect of immunosuppressive regimens necessary to prevent rejection. Direct consequences of infections result in syndromes such as mononucleosis, pneumonia, gastroenteritis, hepatitis, among other entities. Indirect consequences are mediated through cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors elaborated by the transplant recipient in response to microbial replication and invasion, which contribute to the net state of immunosuppression among other effects. This review summarizes the major infections that occur after pediatric organ transplantation, highlighting the current treatment and prevention strategies, based on the available data and/or consensus.

Varicella vaccination in pediatric kidney and liver transplantation

Reports about efficacy and safety of live-virus attenuated vaccines in patients before and after transplantation are mainly based on small patient numbers, making general recommendations for this patient population difficult. Children and adults as well as their close relatives and contact persons should be preferably immune to VZV before solid organ transplantation to avoid VZV-associated complications, thus making VZV vaccination necessary in susceptible individuals. The following literature review focused on efficacy and safety of VZV vaccination in pediatric kidney and liver transplant recipients. Review of literature also revealed that in all pediatric transplant candidates, humoral and cellular immunity against VZV should be consistently monitored to assess waning immunity under immunosuppressive treatment. This approach is desirable to estimate the risk of severe varicella disease after exposure in these patients.

Responses in children to measles vaccination associated with perirenal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Measles infection can be fatal in pediatric patients with chronic renal failure or in patients who have undergone renal transplantation, both of whom are in the immunosuppressed state. The efficacy of single, live measles vaccination in preventing infection was examined.

METHODS

Of 156 children with renal failure who underwent renal transplantation, the changes in antibody titer were investigated before and after renal transplantation in 125 children whose measles antibody titer could be examined, together with disease and vaccination histories. Live measles vaccine was administered to 42 children with negative antibody titer. The antibody seroconversion rate was then investigated in these children, along with rate of antibody maintenance and degree of antibody titer elevation.

RESULTS

Seroconversion rate was 97.6%. Antibody titers measured on HI and EIA were 72 +/- 118 fold (HI) and 36.9 +/- 31.3 (EIA), respectively. The geometric mean of the increase in antibody titer 6 months after vaccination was 15. No side-effects of vaccination were observed in any of the children.

CONCLUSIONS

Live measles vaccination of children with chronic renal failure is effective and safe, because the seroconversion rate, rate of antibody titer maintenance and degree of antibody titer elevation in children with chronic renal failure were all equivalent to those of healthy children.

Cost-effectiveness of varicella vaccination programs: an update of the literature

Varicella is one of the most common infectious diseases in childhood, caused by the varicella zoster virus. Although vaccines are available, there are only a few countries with an early-childhood vaccination program. Most countries mainly focus on vaccination of high-risk groups, such as susceptible healthcare workers. One of the main concerns with a routine early-childhood vaccination program is a potential (temporal) increase of the incidence of herpes zoster among elderly adults. In this review, we focus on the cost-effectiveness of varicella vaccination and on the methodology used in the health-economic studies. In particular, we focus on the perspective adopted, type of model used, the modeled effect on herpes zoster, the vaccine efficacy and price, and on the value of time lost by infection. The vast majority of studies show vaccination of high-risk groups - including susceptible adolescents - to be cost saving. Routine early-childhood vaccination programs are always cost saving if indirect costs of production losses are included, or cost effective, as long as the potential negative effects on zoster are not taken into account. We note that most studies included in the review used old vaccine prices and a single dose of the varicella vaccine, whereas multiple doses are now becoming the standard. Despite that, those aspects limit the timeliness of our review and we believe that the current work does provide useful insights in the cost-effectiveness of varicella vaccination.

Varicella vaccination of immunocompromised children

BACKGROUND

Exposure of immunocompromised children to varicella often requires postexposure prophylaxis. Exposures requiring this management are often not recognized. Varicella can be a severe disease when it occurs in immunocompromised children, in spite of antiviral therapy. Varicella exposure and varicella in these children can also disrupt scheduled therapy for their underlying illness. Both postexposure prophylaxis and treatment of varicella are likely to be expensive and use significant medical resources. Numerous trials have been undertaken to vaccinate children who are immunocompromised by a variety of conditions and therapies that depress their immune function.

METHODS

Clinical trials of varicella vaccine administration to immunocompromised children that were reported since 1975 were identified in the Ovid medical database. Reports were selected for analysis and discussion on the basis of their completeness and the utility of their conclusions.

RESULTS

Vaccination before immune compromise is discussed as a strategy for some settings. The obstacles, potential opportunities, and success in varicella vaccination for immunocompromised children are separately analyzed for (1) children with leukemia and other malignancies, (2) human immunodeficiency virus-infected children, and (3) children with hematopoietic stem cell or solid-organ transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaccination before immune compromise is often successful, and the vaccine-induced response is usually partially or fully protective. In many treatment settings, it is possible to safely vaccinate once the level of immune suppression has been reduced. Targets for future research are outlined. A consensus conference should be undertaken to develop guidelines for the use of varicella vaccine in immunocompromised children.

Skin infections in organ transplant recipients

In contrast to the well-described high risk of skin cancer in organ transplant recipients, skin infections in these patients are not as well explored. Skin infections caused by viruses, bacteria or fungi represent a growing diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in the dermatological aftercare of organ transplant recipients. Differing immunosuppressive drugs and their variable dosage in chronologic sequence after transplantation probably influence the type and appearance of skin infections. The typical chronology of skin infections are wound infections, pyoderma or the reactivation of herpes viruses in the first month post-transplant; the main problems in months 2-5 are opportunistic infections and reactivation of varicella-zoster virus. After 6 months as immunosuppression is reduced, the spectrum of causative organisms approaches that of the general population; mycoses and human papilloma virus (HPV) infections dominate. A causal connection exists between infection with oncogenic viruses such as HPV, Epstein-Barr virus and human herpesvirus 8 and specific skin cancers (squamous cell carcinoma, Kaposi sarcoma and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders). Dermatological care of organ transplant recipients using appropriate diagnostic methods adapted to the modified clinical pattern may lead to early adequate treatment.

Overview of vaccination in chronic kidney disease

Infections are a major cause of death in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, second only to cardiovascular disease, and also contribute to significant morbidity in patients with earlier stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Vaccines are a strategy to attempt to reduce morbidity related to infections. Patients with CKD and ESRD may not respond as well to vaccines as patients without kidney failure, but adequate seroresponse with standard or augmented regimens for vaccinations against influenza, hepatitis B, pneumococcus, and varicella have been documented. Influenza, in particular, seems to provide adequate protection with standard dosing regimens. Despite somewhat reduced effectiveness of certain vaccines in patients with CKD, there is emerging evidence of benefit to vaccination in these populations. However, vaccination rates are relatively low. Given the accumulating evidence of benefit, continuing quality improvement programs focused on increasing vaccination rates in patients with all levels of CKD are needed.

Viral infections affecting the skin in organ transplant recipients: epidemiology and current management strategies

Viral skin infections are common findings in organ transplant recipients. The most important etiological agents are the group of human herpesviruses (HHV), human papillomaviruses (HPV), and molluscum contagiosum virus. HHV that are important in this group of patients are herpes simplex virus (HSV) types 1 and 2, varicella-zoster virus (VZV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), HHV-6 and -7, and HHV-8, which causes Kaposi sarcoma (KS). HSV infections are characterized by their ability to establish latency and then reactivate at a later date. The most common manifestations of HSV infection in organ transplant recipients are mucocutaneous lesions of the oropharynx or genital regions. Treatment is usually with acyclovir, valaciclovir, or famciclovir. Acyclovir resistance may arise although the majority of acyclovir-resistant strains have been isolated from AIDS patients and not organ transplant recipients. In such cases, alternatives such as foscarnet, cidofovir, or trifluridine may have to be considered. VZV causes chickenpox as well as herpes zoster. In organ transplant recipients, recurrent herpes zoster can occur. Acute chickenpox in organ transplant patients should be treated with intravenous acyclovir. CMV infection occurs in 20-60% of all transplant recipients. Cutaneous manifestations, which include nonspecific macular rashes, ulcers, purpuric eruptions, and vesiculobullous lesions, are seen in 10-20% of patients with systemic infection and signify a poor prognosis. The present gold standard for treatment is ganciclovir, but newer drugs such as valganciclovir appear promising. EBV is responsible for some cases of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, which represents the greatest risk of serious EBV disease in transplant recipients. HHV-6 and HHV-7 are two relatively newly discovered viruses and, at present, the body of information concerning these two agents is still fairly limited. KS is caused by HHV-8, which is the most recently discovered lymphotrophic HHV. Iatrogenic KS is seen in solid-organ transplant recipients, with a prevalence of 0.5-5% depending on the patient's country of origin. HPV is ubiquitous, and organ transplant recipients may never totally clear HPV infections, which are the most frequently recurring infections in renal transplant recipients. HPV infection in transplant recipients is important because of its link to the development of certain skin cancers, in particular, squamous cell carcinoma. Regular surveillance, sun avoidance, and patient education are important aspects of the management strategy.

A review of the varicella vaccine in immunocompromised individuals

BACKGROUND

Individuals with underlying cell-mediated immunodeficiency disorders are at high risk of developing severe, life-threatening illness associated with varicella-zoster virus infection. A live-attenuated varicella vaccine is recommended for routine childhood immunisation in some countries. In healthy children, the vaccine is efficacious and safe but because immunocompromised individuals may be unable to limit replication of live-attenuated vaccine viruses, the varicella vaccine is not recommended for them and there are few exceptions.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this paper is to review the published studies addressing the use of the varicella vaccine in people with cell-mediated immunodeficiency disorders.

METHODS

A computerised search on the PubMed database was used to collect the relevant papers published up to March 2003.

RESULTS

The varicella vaccine has been extensively studied in susceptible children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in remission, but studies involving individuals with other immunodeficiency disorders are scarce. Some of the current recommendations are based on very few and small studies with short follow-up. Immunocompromised individuals should be given the varicella vaccine only with complete knowledge of their clinical and immunological conditions and after considering the risks of natural infection and vaccination.

Acute pancreatitis following kidney transplantation - role of viral infections

Acute pancreatitis following renal transplantation is an unusual complication that carries a high mortality. Over the last 10 yr, five of 185 patients at our center developed acute pancreatitis. All had live related donors and were on conventional triple drug immunosuppression. Pancreatitis was classified according to the computed tomography scan based on Atlanta Classification. All five patients who developed acute pancreatitis had evidence of symptomatic or serologically active viral infection (chicken pox in two, cytomegalovirus infection in two, hepatitis E virus in one) and no patient without viral infection developed pancreatitis. Overall, 45 patients developed symptomatic or serologically active viral infection. There was a significant association between viral infection and pancreatitis (chi-square test, p < 0.001). Three patients with severe acute pancreatitis died while both patients with mild pancreatitis survived. An active search for viral infections should be made in all patients with acute pancreatitis. Specific antiviral measures may help reduce the mortality of acute pancreatitis in these patients. Consideration must be given to varicella immunization in patients with renal failure.

Varicella vaccination in pediatric kidney transplant candidates

Existing studies support the use of varicella vaccine in a two-dose regimen in patients with renal disease prior to transplantation. Levels of anti-varicella zoster virus antibody should be monitored on a regular basis after immunization, and where a loss of a previously protective antibody titer occurs, a third booster dose should be considered pretransplant. Further data need to be collected regarding the use of the vaccine in seronegative patients who have already undergone transplantation.

Opportunistic infections after renal transplantation

Opportunistic infection is a serious clinical complication in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation. This article deals with some of the possible infectious agents that were recently encountered at our transplantation centre in Düsseldorf, Germany. Opportunistic organsims such as human herpesviruses 6-8, polyomavirus, parvovirus B19, varicella zoster virus, Nocardia and Listeria monocytogenes are rare but severe complications that are presented in this overview. As a result of the use of new immunosuppresive drugs like tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil these infections are now seen more frequently, so they should always be included in differential diagnostic considerations. New diagnostic procedures and new treatment strategies should allow early detection and successful treatment of opportunistic infections in the majority of kidney transplant recipients.