1
|
Abstract
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are often used for pediatric pain management in the emergency setting and postoperatively. This narrative literature review evaluates pain relief, opioid requirements, and adverse effects associated with NSAID use. A PubMed search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of conventional systemic NSAIDs as pain management for children in the perioperative or emergency department (traumatic injury) setting. Trials of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors ("coxibs") were excluded. Search results included studies of ibuprofen (n = 12), ketoprofen (n = 5), ketorolac (n = 6), and diclofenac (n = 4). NSAIDs reduced the opioid requirement in 10 of 13 studies in which this outcome was measured. NSAID use did not compromise pain relief; NSAIDs provided improved or similar pain scores compared with opioids (or other control) in 24 of 27 studies. Adverse event frequencies were reported in 26 studies; adverse event frequencies with NSAIDs were lower than with opioids (or other control) in three of 26 studies, similar in 21 of 26 studies, and more frequent in two of 26 studies. Perioperative and emergency department use of NSAIDs may reduce opioid requirements while maintaining pain control, with similar or reduced frequencies of opioid-associated adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maureen F Cooney
- Pain Management, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saini A, Maher KO, Deshpande SR. Nonopioid analgesics for perioperative and cardiac surgery pain in children: Current evidence and knowledge gaps. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2019; 13:46-55. [PMID: 32030035 PMCID: PMC6979012 DOI: 10.4103/apc.apc_190_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Revised: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this review is to present the available literature on the use of nonopioid analgesics such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in postcardiac surgery pediatric patients, mainly to focus on patients <1 year of age, and to provide the foundation for future research. Materials and Methods: Published studies that address the use on nonopioid medications for postoperative sedation and analgesia in infants and children undergoing cardiac surgery were identified from online sources. Studies were reviewed by two authors independently to assess the quality of the data as well as the evidence. Due to limited availability of such studies, the review was then expanded to include use in noncardiac procedures as well as to expanded age groups. All studies that met the primary objective were included. Results/Data Synthesis: Majority of the studies in the population of interest were related to use of ketorolac. Five studies specifically addressed ketorolac use in cardiac patients. In addition, studies were reviewed for nonopioid analgesia in noncardiac patients and included as a part of the available evidence as in the case of acetaminophen use. Newer agents as well as agents with very limited information were also acknowledged. Conclusion: Nonopioid medications appear to show promise for analgesia in infants undergoing cardiac surgery, with ketorolac being the most potent agent as a potential substitute for opioids. These agents demonstrate a reasonable safety profile even in the very young. There continue to be significant gaps in knowledge before their adoption becomes routine. However, gives the awareness regarding short-term and long-term impact of opioid use in this vulnerable population, and studies of such agents are an urgent need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish Saini
- Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kevin O Maher
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Sibley Heart Center Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shriprasad R Deshpande
- Heart Transplant and Advanced Cardiac Therapies Program, Children's National Health Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Karaman S, Gunusen I, Uyar M, Firat V. The Effect of Pre-operative Lornoxicam and Ketoprofen Application on the Morphine Consumption of Post-operative Patient-controlled Analgesia. J Int Med Res 2016; 34:168-75. [PMID: 16749412 DOI: 10.1177/147323000603400206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We compared the efficacy of preoperative intramuscular lornoxicam and ketoprofen for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study investigated 60 patients who received lornoxicam (group L, 8 mg), ketoprofen (group K, 100 mg) or saline (group C) 60 min before standard anaesthesia. All patients received patient-controlled analgesia (intravenous morphine) during the post-operative period. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores recorded 2, 4, 6 and 12 h after surgery in groups L and K patients were significantly lower than in group C patients, and VAS scores at 2, 4 and 6 h in group L patients were significantly lower than those in group K patients. Morphine consumption in groups L and K was significantly lower than in group C. Pre-emptive administration of lornoxicam and ketoprofen effectively reduced post-operative pain and morphine consumption, and lornoxicam was more effective than ketoprofen in the early post-operative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Karaman
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pathan SA, Mitra B, Straney LD, Afzal MS, Anjum S, Shukla D, Morley K, Al Hilli SA, Al Rumaihi K, Thomas SH, Cameron PA. Delivering safe and effective analgesia for management of renal colic in the emergency department: a double-blind, multigroup, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 387:1999-2007. [PMID: 26993881 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00652-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The excruciating pain of patients with renal colic on presentation to the emergency department requires effective analgesia to be administered in the shortest possible time. Trials comparing intramuscular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with intravenous opioids or paracetamol have been inconclusive because of the challenges associated with concealment of randomisation, small sample size, differences in outcome measures, and inadequate masking of participants and assessors. We did this trial to develop definitive evidence regarding the choice of initial analgesia and route of administration in participants presenting with renal colic to the emergency department. METHODS In this three-treatment group, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, adult participants (aged 18-65 years) presenting to the emergency department of an academic, tertiary care hospital in Qatar, with moderate to severe renal colic (Numerical pain Rating Scale ≥ 4) were recruited. With the use of computer-generated block randomisation (block sizes of six and nine), participants were assigned (1:1:1) to receive diclofenac (75 mg/3 mL intramuscular), morphine (0.1 mg/kg intravenous), or paracetamol (1 g/100 mL intravenous). Participants, clinicians, and trial personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants achieving at least a 50% reduction in initial pain score at 30 min after analgesia, assessed by intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis, which included patients where a calculus in the urinary tract was detected with imaging. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02187614. FINDINGS Between Aug 5, 2014, and March 15, 2015, we randomly assigned 1645 participants, of whom 1644 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (547 in the diclofenac group, 548 in the paracetemol group, and 549 in the morphine group). Ureteric calculi were detected in 1316 patients, who were analysed as the per-protocol population (438 in the diclofenac group, 435 in the paracetemol group, and 443 in the morphine group). The primary outcome was achieved in 371 (68%) patients in the diclofenac group, 364 (66%) in the paracetamol group, and 335 (61%) in the morphine group in the intention-to-treat population. Compared to morphine, diclofenac was significantly more effective in achieving the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR] 1·35, 95% CI 1·05-1·73, p=0·0187), whereas no difference was detected in the effectiveness of morphine compared with intravenous paracetamol (1·26, 0·99-1·62, p=0·0629). In the per-protocol population, diclofenac (OR 1·49, 95% CI 1·13-1·97, p=0·0046) and paracetamol (1·40, 1·06-1·85, p=0·0166) were more effective than morphine in achieving the primary outcome. Acute adverse events in the morphine group occurred in 19 (3%) participants. Significantly lower numbers of adverse events were recorded in the diclofenac group (7 [1%] participants, OR 0·31, 95% CI 0·12-0·78, p=0·0088) and paracetamol group (7 [1%] participants, 0·36, 0·15-0·87, p=0·0175) than in the morphine group. During the 2 week follow-up, no additional adverse events were noted in any group. INTERPRETATION Intramuscular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs offer the most effective sustained analgesia for renal colic in the emergency department and seem to have fewer side-effects. FUNDING Hamad Medical Corporation Medical Research Center, Doha, Qatar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameer A Pathan
- Emergency Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar; Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Biswadev Mitra
- Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; National Trauma Research Institute, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lahn D Straney
- Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Muhammad Shuaib Afzal
- Emergency Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Shahzad Anjum
- Emergency Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Dharmesh Shukla
- Emergency Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Kostantinos Morley
- Emergency Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Shatha A Al Hilli
- Emergency Radiology Section-Radiology Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Khalid Al Rumaihi
- Department of Urology, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Stephen H Thomas
- Emergency Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar; Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, Doha, Qatar
| | - Peter A Cameron
- Emergency Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar; Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; National Trauma Research Institute, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Immediate rescue designs in pediatric analgesic trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 2015; 122:150-171. [PMID: 25222831 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000000445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Designing analgesic clinical trials in pediatrics requires a balance between scientific, ethical, and practical concerns. A previous consensus group recommended immediate rescue designs using opioid sparing as a surrogate measure of analgesic efficacy. The authors summarize the performance of rescue analgesic designs in pediatric trials of four commonly used classes of analgesics: opioids, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and local anesthetics. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, and Web of science were searched in April 2013. The 85 studies selected were randomized or controlled clinical trials using immediate rescue paradigms in postoperative pain settings. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to synthesize predefined outcomes using Hedges' g. Difference between the means of the treatment arms were also expressed as a percentage of the corresponding value in the placebo group (placebo-treatment/placebo). Distributions of pain scores in study and control groups and relationships between opioid sparing and pain scores were examined. RESULTS For each of the four study drug classes, significant opioid sparing was demonstrated in a majority of studies by one or more of the following endpoints: (1) total dose (milligram per kilogram per hour), (2) percentage of children requiring rescue medication, and (3) time to first rescue medication (minutes). Pain scores averaged 2.4/10 in study groups, 3.4/10 in control groups. CONCLUSIONS Opioid sparing is a feasible pragmatic endpoint for pediatric pain analgesic trials. This review serves to guide future research in pediatric analgesia trials, which could test whether some specific design features may improve assay sensitivity while minimizing the risk of unrelieved pain.
Collapse
|
6
|
Hunter D, Chai C, Barr GA. Effects of COX inhibition and LPS on formalin induced pain in the infant rat. Dev Neurobiol 2014; 75:1068-79. [PMID: 25205468 DOI: 10.1002/dneu.22230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2014] [Revised: 08/29/2014] [Accepted: 09/07/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
In the adult, immune and neural processes jointly modulate pain. During development, both are in transition and little is known about the role that the immune system plays in pain processing in infants and children. The objective of this study was to determine if inhibition or augmentation of the immune system would alter pain processing in the infant rat, as it does in the adult. In Experiment 1, rat pups aged 3, 10, or 21 (PN3, PN10, and PN21) days of age were pretreated with NS398 (selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor) or SC560 (selective COX-1 inhibitor) and tested in the intraplantar formalin test to assess effects of COX inhibition on nociception. Neither drug had an effect on the behavioral response at PN3 or PN10 pups but both drugs attenuated nociceptive scores in PN21 pups. cFos expression in the spinal cord likewise was reduced only at PN21. In Experiment 2, pups were injected with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) prior to the formalin test at PN3 or PN21. LPS increased the nociceptive response more robustly at PN21 than at PN3, while increasing cytokine mRNA equally at both ages. The augmentation of pain responding at PN21 was largely during the late stages of the formalin test, as reported in the adult. These data support previous findings demonstrating late maturing immune modulation of nociceptive behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deirtra Hunter
- Department of Developmental Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York
| | - Christina Chai
- Department of Psychology, Mercy College, Dobbs Ferry, New York, 10522
| | - Gordon A Barr
- Department of Developmental Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York
- Department of Psychology, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wong I, St John-Green C, Walker SM. Opioid-sparing effects of perioperative paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2013; 23:475-95. [PMID: 23570544 PMCID: PMC4272569 DOI: 10.1111/pan.12163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/04/2013] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Perioperative pain in children can be effectively managed with systemic opioids, but addition of paracetamol or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may reduce opioid requirements and potentially improve analgesia and/or reduce adverse effects. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted to identify trials evaluating postoperative opioid requirements in children and comparing NSAID and/or paracetamol with placebo. Studies were stratified according to design: continuous availability of intravenous opioid (PCA/NCA) vs intermittent 'as needed' bolus; and single vs multiple dose paracetamol/NSAIDs. Primary outcome data were extracted, and the percentage decrease in mean opioid consumption was calculated for statistically significant reductions compared with placebo. Secondary outcomes included differences in pain intensity, adverse effects (sedation, respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, bleeding), and patient/parent satisfaction. RESULTS Thirty-one randomized controlled studies, with 48 active treatment arms compared with placebo, were included. Significant opioid sparing was reported in 38 of 48 active treatment arms, across 21 of the 31 studies. Benefit was most consistently reported when multiple doses of study drug were administered, and 24 h PCA or NCA opioid requirements were assessed. The proportion of positive studies was less with paracetamol, but was influenced by dose and route of administration. Despite availability of opioid for titration, a reduction in pain intensity by NSAIDs and/or paracetamol was reported in 16 of 29 studies. Evidence for clinically significant reductions in opioid-related adverse effects was less robust. CONCLUSION This systematic review supports addition of NSAIDs and/or paracetamol to systemic opioid for perioperative pain management in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Wong
- Department of Anaesthesia, Great Ormond St Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustLondon, UK,School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's HospitalCambridge, UK
| | - Celia St John-Green
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's HospitalCambridge, UK
| | - Suellen M Walker
- Department of Anaesthesia, Great Ormond St Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustLondon, UK,Portex Unit: Pain Research, UCL Institute of Child HealthLondon, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Michelet D, Andreu-Gallien J, Bensalah T, Hilly J, Wood C, Nivoche Y, Mantz J, Dahmani S. A meta-analysis of the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs for pediatric postoperative pain. Anesth Analg 2011; 114:393-406. [PMID: 22104069 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31823d0b45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid side effects are a great concern during the postoperative period in children. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been shown to effectively decrease postoperative pain, but their opioid-sparing effect is still controversial. In this present meta-analysis, we investigated the postoperative opioid-sparing effect of NSAIDs in children. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify clinical trials using NSAIDs and opioids as perioperative analgesic compounds in children and infants. Outcomes measured were opioid consumption, pain intensity, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and urinary retention. All outcomes were studied during postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay and the first 24 postoperative hours. Data from each trial were combined to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) or standardized mean difference (SMD) and their 95% confidence interval. RESULTS Twenty-seven randomized controlled studies were analyzed. Perioperative administration of NSAIDs decreased postoperative opioid requirement (both in the PACU and during the first 24 postoperative hours; SMD = -0.66 [-0.84, -0.48] and -0.83 [-1.11, -0.55], respectively), pain intensity in the PACU (SMD = -0.85 [-1.24, -0.47]), and PONV during the first 24 postoperative hours (OR = 0.75 [0.57-0.99]). NSAIDs did not decrease pain intensity during the first 24 postoperative hours (OR = 0.56 [0.26-1.2]) and PONV during PACU stay (OR = 1.02 [0.73-1.44]). Subgroup analysis according to the timing of NSAID administration (intraoperative versus postoperative), type of surgery, or coadministration of paracetamol did not show any influence of these factors on the studied outcomes except the reduction of pain intensity and the incidence of PONV during the first 24 postoperative hours, which were influenced by the coadministration of paracetamol and the type of surgery, respectively. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis shows that perioperative NSAID administration reduces opioid consumption and PONV during the postoperative period in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne Michelet
- Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Robert Debré University Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
The NSAID ketoprofen is used widely in the management of inflammatory and musculoskeletal conditions, pain, and fever in children and adults. Pharmacokinetic studies show that drug exposure after a single intravenous dose is similar in children and adults (after dose normalization), and thus similar mg/kg bodyweight dosing may be used in children and adults. Ketoprofen crosses the blood-brain barrier and therefore has the potential to cause central analgesic effects. Ketoprofen has been investigated in children for the treatment of pain and fever, peri- and postoperative pain, and inflammatory pain conditions. The results of four clinical trials in febrile conditions with the oral syrup formulation indicate that ketoprofen is as effective as acetaminophen (paracetamol) and ibuprofen, allowing children to rapidly return to daily activities with improvements in sleep quality and appetite. Studies of ketoprofen in the management of postoperative pain indicate that ketoprofen is a highly effective analgesic when administered perioperatively for a variety of surgical types, by a variety of routes, and whether given preoperatively or postoperatively. For adenoidectomy, intravenous ketoprofen provided superior postoperative analgesic efficacy compared with placebo. Analgesic efficacy was similar with intravenous, intramuscular, or rectal routes of administration, but oral administration just before surgery was inferior to intravenous administration in this setting. In patients undergoing a tonsillectomy, intravenous ketoprofen was superior to intravenous tramadol in terms of the need for postoperative rescue analgesia, but did not remove the need for rescue opioid therapy in these patients. Intravenous ketoprofen had superior postoperative analgesic efficacy to placebo when given as an adjuvant to epidural sufentanil analgesia after major surgery. Oral ketoprofen has shown efficacy in the treatment of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Ketoprofen is generally well tolerated in pediatric patients. Most of the adverse events reported are mild and transient, and are similar to those observed with other NSAIDs. Long-term tolerability has not yet been fully established in children, but data from three studies in >900 children indicate that oral ketoprofen is well tolerated when administered for up to 3 weeks after surgery. In conclusion, ketoprofen is effective and well tolerated in children for the control of post-surgical pain and for the control of pain and fever in inflammatory conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannu Kokki
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Celebi S, Hacimustafaoglu M, Aygun D, Arisoy ES, Karali Y, Akgoz S, Citak Kurt AN, Seringec M. Antipyretic effect of ketoprofen. Indian J Pediatr 2009; 76:287-91. [PMID: 19129989 DOI: 10.1007/s12098-008-0234-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2007] [Accepted: 04/10/2008] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and side effect profile of ketoprofen as well as compliance with respect to the taste of the drug and compare these parameters with those of acetaminophen and ibuprofen. METHODS A total of 301 patients between 1-14 years of age who applied to emergency rooms of three medical centers with the complaint of fever that required antipyretic therapy were included in the study. Fever was measured with the aid of a tympanic thermometer (Braun Kronberg 6014) and followed for 4-6 hours. The measurement was repeated at 30, 60, 120 minutes, and again 4-6 hours after the initial assessment. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 47.8+/-41.1 months. The patients randomly received 15 mg/kg/dose of acetaminophen (n=112 group 1), 0.5 mg/kg/dose of ketoprofen (n=105, group 2), or 10 mg/kg/dose of ibuprofen (n=84, group 3). Fever was 38.4+/-0.7 degrees C, 38.4+/-0.7 degrees C, and 38.5+/-0.5 degrees C at 30 minutes; 38.0+/-0.7 degrees C, 37.9+/-0.7 degrees C, and 38.0+/-0.6 degrees C at 60 minutes (p>0.05), 37.7+/-0.6 degrees C, 37.6+/-0.7 degrees C, and 37.7+/-0.5 degrees C at 120 minutes (p>0.05); 37.5+/-0.7 degrees C, 37.3+/-0.6 degrees C, and 37.4+/-0.6 degrees C at 4-6 hours after admission (p>0.05). The fever was significantly lower at 30, 60, and 120 minutes in all group s (p<0.05). Early vomiting after medication (<6 hours) was observed in 3.8%, 13.5%, and 9.6% whereas late vomiting (6-48 hours) occurred in 1.3%, 2.7%, and 5.8% respectively (p>0.05). Bad taste was expressed by 5.1%, 12.2%, and 5.8% early (<6 hours), and 3.9%, 8.1%, and 3.8% late (6-48 hours) (p>0.05). There were no differences between age groups for antipyretic effect, taste and adverse effect in three drugs (p>0.05). CONCLUSION All three drugs were similar in terms of efficacy, adverse effects, and compliance within 48 hours of therapy. These results suggest that ketoprofen may be used for antipyresis as an alternative to acetaminophen and ibuprofen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Celebi
- Uludag University Faculty of Medicine Department of Pediatrics, Bursa, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tom-Revzon C. Erratic absorption of intramuscular antimicrobial delivery in infants and children. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2008; 3:733-40. [PMID: 17916058 DOI: 10.1517/17425255.3.5.733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
In the absence of intravenous or enteral access, an intramuscular (IM) injection of medications is a viable alternative. Vaccines, antibiotics and analgesics are commonly administered by this route in pediatric medicine to enhance adherence to regimens. Although it is expected that the entire dose be administered by the IM route, the absorption (rate and extent) of the medication from the muscle tissue into systemic circulation can be erratic and depends on the drug's physicochemical factors and patient-specific factors. Despite the variability in absorption, administration of medications by the IM route may be considered when medications do not need to attain maximal concentrations rapidly. IM injections are generally well-tolerated, but potential injury to the injected muscle and the proximal nerves should be recognized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Tom-Revzon
- Long Island University, Division of Pharmacy Practice, Arnold and Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Brooklyn, New York 11201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hamunen K, Kalso E. A systematic review of trial methodology, using the placebo groups of randomized controlled trials in paediatric postoperative pain. Pain 2005; 116:146-58. [PMID: 15936888 DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2005] [Accepted: 04/07/2005] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Trial methodology was evaluated in paediatric analgesic studies. Databases were searched for randomised, placebo controlled studies of systemic paracetamol, NSAIDs and opioids administered for acute postoperative pain in children. Eighty-three studies met the inclusion criteria and 40 were included for the analysis. Analgesics were administered for established postoperative pain in two studies only. In all other studies they were administered in a prophylactic manner. As study design and sensitivity are particularly demanding in studies using pre-emptive dosing of analgesics, the placebo groups were analysed for issues of study sensitivity. Postoperative pain outcomes included pain scores in 34, rescue analgesia in 36, time to first rescue analgesia in 15, pain on activity in eight, number of patients with pain in six, pain relief in three, global efficacy rating in two and analgesic consumption via PCA in four studies. Twenty of 36 studies reported criteria for rescue analgesia that varied from 20 to 77% of the maximum pain intensity. Need of rescue analgesia showed more often differences between study groups than time to first rescue analgesia or pain intensity. Rescue analgesia was administered to 21-100% of the patients in the placebo groups where no other analgesics were given perioperatively. Most patients in the placebo groups had pain that was greater than 30% of the maximum. In conclusion, analysis of the methodology showed several aspects of trial design that can be improved in future studies. Placebo control groups can be used in paediatric analgesic studies to demonstrate internal sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katri Hamunen
- Pain Clinic, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, P.O. Box 140, FIN-00029 HUS, Finland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bibliography Current World Literature. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2003. [DOI: 10.1097/01.aco.0000084472.59960.ce] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
14
|
Abstract
Pain is a common symptom after surgery in children, and the need for effective pain management is obvious. For example, after myringotomy, despite the brief nature of the procedure, at least one-half of children have significant pain. After more extended surgery, such as tonsillectomy, almost all children have considerable pain longer than 7 days. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are useful for postoperative pain management because surgery causes both pain and inflammation. Several pediatric studies indicate NSAIDs are effective analgesics in the management of mild and moderate pain. In the treatment of severe pain, NSAIDs should be given with acetaminophen (paracetamol) or opioids, and the use of an appropriate regional analgesic technique should be considered. NSAIDs are more effective in preventing pain than in the relief of established pain. Pain following surgery is best managed by providing medication on a regular basis, preventing the pain from recurring. This proactive approach should be implemented for any procedure where postoperative pain is the likely outcome. In children, the choice of formulation can be more important than the choice of drug. Intravenous administration is preferred for children with an intravenous line in place; thereafter mixtures and small tablets are feasible options. Children dislike suppositories, and intramuscular administration should not be used in nonsedated children. Ibuprofen, diclofenac, ketoprofen and ketorolac are the most extensively evaluated NSAIDs in children. Only a few trials have compared different NSAIDs, but no major differences in the analgesic action are expected when appropriate doses of each drug are used. Whether NSAIDs differ in the incidence and severity of adverse effects is open to discussion. Because NSAIDs prevent platelet aggregation they may increase bleeding. A few studies indicate that ketorolac may increase bleeding more so than other NSAIDs, but the evidence is conflicting. Severe adverse effects of NSAIDs in children are very rare, but it is important to know about adverse effects in order to recognize and treat them when they do occur. NSAIDs are contraindicated in patients in whom sensitivity reactions are precipitated by aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) or other NSAIDs. They should be used with caution in children with liver dysfunction, impaired renal function, hypovolemia or hypotension, coagulation disorders, thrombocytopenia, or active bleeding from any cause. In contrast, it seems that most children with mild asthma may use NSAIDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannu Kokki
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|