Monitoring functional residual capacity (FRC) by quantifying oxygen/carbon dioxide fluxes during a short apnea

Simulating capnography in software on the METI emergency care simulator

INTRODUCTION

We attempted to adapt a METI Emergency Care Simulator to support anesthesia scenarios but faced two challenges: the CO2 gas exhaled by the mannequin does not represent the simulated patient's physical status, and the METI Waveform Display software does not support capnography monitoring.

METHODS

We developed a software application that simulates a CO2 trace that corresponds to the mannequin's ventilation. The software generated a range of CO2 waveform shapes whereas the mannequin was either spontaneously breathing or being mechanically ventilated. We tested the software in three environments: (1) a full-scale simulator research study of advanced anesthesia monitoring displays, (2) simulator-based training courses at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, and (3) at the Sydney Medical Simulation Centre.

RESULTS

The research study participants successfully used the simulated monitor to confirm correct intubation and detect airway events. Instructors at the Royal Adelaide Hospital reported improvement in the fidelity of simulations for anesthesia trainees. Simulation coordinators at the Sydney Medical Simulation Centre were able to use their Emergency Care Simulator for anesthesia training scenarios, which they were previously unable to run.

CONCLUSION

We were able to substantially increase the realism of our anesthetic scenarios for research studies and training participants with only a small increase in the fidelity of our capnography monitoring.

Measurements of functional residual capacity during intensive care treatment: the technical aspects and its possible clinical applications

Direct measurement of lung volume, i.e. functional residual capacity (FRC) has been recommended for monitoring during mechanical ventilation. Mostly due to technical reasons, FRC measurements have not become a routine monitoring tool, but promising techniques have been presented. We performed a literature search of studies with the key words 'functional residual capacity' or 'end expiratory lung volume' and summarize the physiology and patho-physiology of FRC measurements in ventilated patients, describe the existing techniques for bedside measurement, and provide an overview of the clinical questions that can be addressed using an FRC assessment. The wash-in or wash-out of a tracer gas in a multiple breath maneuver seems to be best applicable at bedside, and promising techniques for nitrogen or oxygen wash-in/wash-out with reasonable accuracy and repeatability have been presented. Studies in ventilated patients demonstrate that FRC can easily be measured at bedside during various clinical settings, including positive end-expiratory pressure optimization, endotracheal suctioning, prone position, and the weaning from mechanical ventilation. Alveolar derecruitment can easily be monitored and improvements of FRC without changes of the ventilatory setting could indicate alveolar recruitment. FRC seems to be insensitive to over-inflation of already inflated alveoli. Growing evidence suggests that FRC measurements, in combination with other parameters such as arterial oxygenation and respiratory compliance, could provide important information on the pulmonary situation in critically ill patients. Further studies are needed to define the exact role of FRC in monitoring and perhaps guiding mechanical ventilation.

Determination of functional residual capacity by oxygen washin-washout: a validation study

OBJECTIVE

To validate a new system for functional residual capacity (FRC) measurements using oxygen washin/washout in spontaneously breathing humans. The system (LUFU, Drägerwerk AG, Lübeck, Germany) consists of an unmodified EVITA 4 ventilator, a side-stream paramagnetic oxygen sensor and a dedicated software.

DESIGN

Laboratory study and measurements in spontaneously breathing volunteers.

SETTING

Pulmonary function laboratory of a university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

20 healthy and 15 lung diseased volunteers.

INTERVENTIONS

FRC was measured by LUFU (LUFU-FRC) and by helium dilution (He-FRC); intra-thoracic gas volume (ITGV) was determined by body plethysmography. Each measurement cycle consisted of four independent LUFU-FRC determinations (step change of FiO(2) from 0.21 to 0.5 and back and from 0.21 to 1.0 and back), two helium-dilution runs and two body box measurements. Repeatability and agreement between methods were determined by comparing different measurements of one technique and by comparing different techniques among each other.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Repeatability of LUFU-FRC was estimated by comparing washin to washout and the different FiO(2)steps. The difference of the means was 3.7% at the most. Agreement between methods resulted in the following differences (mean+/-standard deviation of differences) for healthy and lung-diseased volunteers, respectively: LUFU-FRC vs. He-FRC -0.40+/-0.50 L (0.02+/-0.95 L), LUFU-FRC vs. ITGV -0.43+/-0.54 L (-0.18+/-0.61 L) and He-FRC vs. ITGV -0.03+/-0.43 L (-0.20+/-0.98 L).

CONCLUSIONS

LUFU is a non-invasive method for the determination of FRC that requires only minor additional equipment and no modification to the ventilator. It can be used in difficult conditions such as breathing patterns with variations from breath to breath. The results of this study show that LUFU is sufficiently reliable and repeatable to warrant its clinical application.

Estimation of Functional Residual Capacity at the Bedside Using Standard Monitoring Equipment: A Modified Nitrogen Washout/Washin Technique Requiring a Small Change of the Inspired Oxygen Fraction

We developed a modified nitrogen washin/washout technique based on standard monitors using inspiratory and end-tidal gas concentration values for functional residual capacity (FRC) measurements in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). For validation we used an oxygen-consuming lung model ventilated with an inspiratory oxygen fraction (Fio(2)) between 0.3 and 1.0. The respiratory quotient of the lung model was varied between 0.7 and 1.0. Measurements were performed changing Fio(2) with fractions of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3. In 28 patients with ARF, duplicate measurements were performed. In the lung model, an Fio(2) change of 0.1 resulted in a value of 103 +/- 5% of the reference FRC value of the lung model, and the precision was equally good up to an Fio(2) of 1.0 with a value of 103 +/- 7%. In the patients, duplicate measurements showed a bias of -5 mL with a 95% confidence interval [-38; 29 mL ]. A comparison of a change in Fio(2) of 0.1 with 0.3 showed a bias of -9 mL and limits of agreement of [-365; 347 mL]. This study shows good precision of FRC measurements with standard monitors using a change in Fio(2) of only 0.1. Measurements can be performed with equal precision up to an Fio(2) of 1.0.