Albumin dialysis in cirrhosis with superimposed acute liver injury: possible impact of albumin dialysis on hospitalization costs

Definition, diagnosis and epidemiology of acute-on-chronic liver failure

This narrative review addresses the definition of acute-on-chronic liver failure, a condition associated with high short-term mortality in patients with chronic liver disease and/or cirrhosis. We provide two major points of view: the East and the West perspective. Both definitions vary regarding the underlying patient population and organ failure(s) definition. Nevertheless, all the definitions have their clinical utility: from the core concept of having the "liver" as a conditio sine qua non, the syndrome cannot exist (Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver); a data-driven, robust definition (European Association for the Study of the Liver); a bedside tool that can quickly identify patients at high risk of dying (North American Consortium for the Study of End-stage Liver Disease [NACSELD]). In each section, we provide the overall definitions, the criteria of organ failure(s), and some epidemiological data illustrating how these apply in each area of the world.

The molecular adsorbent recirculating system in posthepatectomy liver failure: Results from a prospective phase I study

Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) represents the single most important cause of postoperative mortality after major liver resection, yet no effective treatment option is available. Extracorporeal liver support devices might be helpful, but systematic studies are lacking. Accordingly, we aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) in patients with PHLF. Between December 2012 and May 2015, a total of 206 patients underwent major or extended hepatectomy, and 10 consecutive patients with PHLF (according to the Balzan 50:50 criteria) were enrolled into the study. MARS treatment was initiated on postoperative day 5-7, and five to seven consecutive treatment sessions were completed for each patient. In total, 59 MARS cycles were implemented, and MARS was initiated and completed without major complications in any patient. However, 1 patient developed an immense asymptomatic hyperbilirubinemia (without encephalopathy), 1 had repeated clotting problems in the MARS filter, and 2 patients experienced access problems with the central venous line. Otherwise, no adverse events were observed. In 9 patients, the bilirubin level and international normalized ratio decreased significantly (P < 0.05) during MARS treatment. The 60- and 90-day mortality was 0% and 10%, respectively. Among the 9 survivors, 4 still had liver dysfunction at 90 days postoperatively. Five patients were alive 1 year postoperatively without any signs of liver dysfunction or disease recurrence. Conclusion: The use of MARS in PHLF is feasible and safe and improves liver function in patients with PHLF. In the present study, 60- and 90-day mortality rates were unexpectedly low compared to a historical control group. The impact of MARS treatment on mortality in PHLF should be further evaluated in a randomized controlled clinical trial. (Hepatology Communications 2018;2:445-454).

Cost-utility of molecular adsorbent recirculating system treatment in acute liver failure

AIM: To determine the short-term cost-utility of molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) treatment in acute liver failure (ALF).

METHODS: A controlled retrospective study was conducted with 90 ALF patients treated with MARS from 2001 to 2005. Comparisons were made with a historical control group of 17 ALF patients treated from 2000 to 2001 in the same intensive care unit (ICU) specializing in liver diseases. The 3-year outcomes and number of liver transplantations were recorded. All direct liver disease-related medical expenses from 6 mo before to 3 years after ICU treatment were determined for 31 MARS patients and 16 control patients. The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) before MARS treatment was estimated by a panel of ICU doctors and after MARS using a mailed 15D (15-dimensional generic health-related quality of life instrument) questionnaire. The HRQoL, cost, and survival data were combined and the incremental cost/quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was calculated.

RESULTS: In surviving ALF patients, the health-related quality of life after treatmeant was generally high and comparable to the age- and gender-matched general Finnish population. Compared to the controls, the average cost per QALY was considerably lower in the MARS group (64 732€vs 133 858€) within a timeframe of 3.5 years. The incremental cost of standard medical treatment alone compared to MARS was 10 928€, and the incremental number of QALYs gained by MARS was 0.66.

CONCLUSION: MARS treatment combined with standard medical treatment for ALF in an ICU setting is more cost-effective than standard medical treatment alone.

[Evaluation of extracorporeal liver support systems in the treatment of liver failure. A systematic review]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the MARS and Prometheus extracorporeal liver support systems in the treatment of liver failure.

DESIGN

We performed a systematic review of the literature from January 1999 to June 2009 in the Medline, Embase, HTA, DARE, NHSEED, Cochrane Library Plus, Clinical Trials Registry and HSRPROJ databases. Study selection was based on a series of previously established inclusion criteria related to the study design, population, type of intervention, language, and outcome measures.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Patients with acute liver failure or acute exacerbations of chronic liver failure treated with the MARS or Prometheus systems.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Data on safety, long-term survival, clinical effects and biochemical and hemodynamic variables.

RESULTS

We selected 22 studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of the MARS and Prometheus systems. Adequate evaluation of these techniques was hampered by the heterogeneity of the studies and their methodological limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Extracorporeal liver support systems are able to purify both hydrosoluble and protein-bound substances. However, current data show that only the MARS system reduces mortality in acute liver failure and in acute exacerbations of chronic liver failure, although this reduction is non-significant. These techniques can be considered safe, with adverse effects similar to those of the control group. Their main indication is severe liver failure, for short periods while the liver recovers or a liver transplant becomes available.

Survival predictors in patients treated with a molecular adsorbent recirculating system

AIM: To identify prognostic factors for survival in patients with liver failure treated with a molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS).

METHODS: MARS is a liver-assisting device that has been used in the treatment of liver failure to enable native liver recovery, and as a bridge to liver transplantation (LTX). We analyzed the 1-year outcomes of 188 patients treated with MARS, from 2001 to 2007, in an intensive care unit specializing in liver disease. Demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded before and after each treatment. One-year survival and the number of LTXs were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors predicting survival.

RESULTS: The study included 113 patients with acute liver failure (ALF), 62 with acute-on-chronic liver failure (AOCLF), 11 with graft failure (GF), and six with miscellaneous liver failure. LTX was performed for 29% of patients with ALF, 18% with AOCLF and 55% with GF. The overall 1-year survival rate was 74% for ALF, 27% for AOCLF, and 73% for GF. The poorest survival rate, 6%, was noted in non-transplanted patients with alcohol-related AOCLF and cirrhosis, whereas, patients with enlarged and steatotic liver had 55% survival. The etiology of liver failure was the most important predictor of survival (P < 0.0001). Other prognostic factors were encephalopathy (P = 0.001) in paracetamol-related ALF, coagulation factors (P = 0.049) and encephalopathy (P = 0.064) in non-paracetamol-related toxic ALF, and alanine aminotransferase (P = 0.013) and factor V levels (P = 0.022) in ALF of unknown etiology.

CONCLUSION: The etiology of liver disease was the most important prognostic factor. MARS treatment appears to be ineffective in AOCLF with end-stage cirrhosis without an LTX option.

[Safety and efficacy of the MARS therapy applied by continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) monitors]

OBJECTIVE

Analyze the utility and safety of MARS therapy applied with the CRRT monitor.

DESIGN

Prospective study of cohorts.

SCOPE

Polyvalent ICU in tertiary university hospital with hepatic transplantation program.

PATIENTS

Thirty one patients: 9 (22.6%) with acute liver failure (ALF) (1 hepatic surgery, 1 primary graft failure, 7 other causes) and 22 (71%) with acute-on-chronic failure (AoCLF).

INTERVENTIONS

For the treatment, the patients with ALF are maintained in the ICU but those with AoCLF are admitted for the performance of the different sessions, that are programmed for a duration of at least 15 hours in AoCLF and in ALF are maintained continuously, changing the circuit every 24 hours.

VARIABLES OF INTEREST

Metabolic control and complications registered in 75 sessions on 31 patients.

RESULTS

Urea decrease was 33.5 (29-38%), creatinine 36 (31-41%), total bilirubin 29 (25-33%) and direct bilirubin 34 (30-38%). Clearance was slower, but sustained, after the first 4 hours of each session both for urea (p<0.001) as well as for bilirubin (p<0.05). The hemodynamic parameters improved and the hematological ones were not altered. We detected decrease in platelets (131 to 120x109/L, p<0.01). In 95 of the sessions in which heparin was used and in 6% where epoprostenol was used, we observed mild bleeding. We cultured albumin of the circuit at the end of the session in 50 occasions and only obtained growth in 3 cases (6%) (2 Staphylococcus epidermidis, 1 S. haemolyticus) without signs of contamination in the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The MARS system applied by CRRT monitors provide adequate bilirubin clearance percentages and is safe, even in serious patients. Prolongation of the duration of the sessions was not accompanied by an increase in the risk of infection secondary to the albumin contamination.

MARS dialysis in decompensated alcoholic liver disease: a single-center experience

Acute decompensation of chronically stable alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is the most common cause of terminal liver failure in developed countries. Molecular adsorbent recirculation system (MARS) is increasingly used as artificial liver support to facilitate spontaneous organ recovery. However, the experience to date and the evidence to justify this therapeutic strategy in acutely decompensated ALD are still insufficient. We report our clinical experience with MARS in 14 patients with acutely decompensated ALD (6 male subjects; median age [interquartile range], 51 [47-56] years; Child-Pugh score, 12 [10-13]; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, 20 [18-24]) and severely impaired liver function whose disease was unresponsive to conventional supportive care. At least 3 sessions were applied in any patient (48 sessions in total). Under MARS treatment, the following levels decreased: bilirubin (544 [489-604] to 242 [178-348] micromol/L; P<0.001), creatinine (212 [112-385] to 91 [66-210] micromol/L; P=0.002), cholestatic parameter gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (5.9 [1.8-13.1] to 4.6 [1.8-8.3] micromol/L) (P<0.001), blood urea nitrogen (56 [32-91] to 34 [21-68] mmol/L; P=0.044), and platelet count (176 [85-241] to 84 [31-145] Gpt/L; P=0.004). In contrast, MARS failed to improve daily urine output (P=0.846), ammonia levels (P=0.340), or thromboplastin time (P=0.775). Only 3 patients survived the hospital stay (mortality 78.6%). Although MARS improved laboratory parameters of hepatic detoxification and renal function in patients with acutely decompensated ALD, the patients' mortality remained unsatisfactorily high. Our experience does not support the indiscriminative use of MARS in acutely decompensated ALD without further controlled studies.

Transferability of economic evaluations: approaches and factors to consider when using results from one geographic area for another

BACKGROUND

Geographic transferability of economic evaluation data from one country to another has the potential to make a more efficient use of national and international evaluation resources. However, inappropriate transferability of economic data can provide misleading results and lead to an inefficient use of scarce health care resources.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to review, summarize and categorize the literature on: (i) factors affecting the geographic transferability of economic evaluation data; and (ii) approaches which have either been proposed or used for transferability.

METHODS

A systematic literature review on transferability was conducted. Electronic databases, hand searching and bibliographic searching techniques were utilized. Inclusion criteria for the review included conceptual or empirical papers with mention of factors affecting, or approaches for, transferability of economic evaluation data across geographic locations. Exclusion criteria included papers published prior to 1966, non-English language papers, pure science studies and animal studies. Three databases were involved in the primary search: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL. In addition to the primary search, the Heath Economic Evaluation Database (OHE HEED), the NHS EED database and the EconLit databases were searched. Transferability factors were classified into major and minor categories, a classification of alternative transferability approaches was developed, and the number of empirical studies was catalogued according to this classification.

RESULTS

There is a substantial amount of literature on factors potentially affecting transferability. Based on these papers we identified 77 factors and subsequently developed a classification system which grouped these factors into five broad categories based on characteristics of the patient, the disease, the provider, the health care system and methodological conventions. Another 40 studies were identified which attempted to transfer economic evaluation data from one country to another and these were classified according to the sources for clinical efficacy, resource utilization and unit cost data.

CONCLUSIONS

There is strong evidence indicating that transferability of economic evaluation data is a difficult and complex task. Approaches which have been used for transferability suggest that, at a minimum, there is a need for country-specific substitution of practice pattern data as well as unit cost data. A limitation of this review relates to the lack of empirical studies which prevents stronger conclusions regarding which transferability factors are most important to consider and under which circumstances.