Experiences with fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia at a Swedish hospital over a 10-year period

Antenatal intravenous immunoglobulins in pregnancies at risk of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: comparison of neonatal outcome in treated and nontreated pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Maternal alloantibodies to human platelet antigen-1a can cause severe intracranial hemorrhage in a fetus or newborn. Although never evaluated in placebo-controlled clinical trials, most Western countries use off-label weekly administration of high-dosage intravenous immunoglobulin in all pregnant women with an obstetrical history of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. In Norway, antenatal intravenous immunoglobulin is only recommended in pregnancies wherein a previous child had intracranial hemorrhage (high-risk) and is generally not given in other human platelet antigen-1a alloimmunized pregnancies (low-risk).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the frequency of anti-human platelet antigen-1a-induced intracranial hemorrhage in pregnancies at risk treated with intravenous immunoglobulin vs pregnancies not receiving this treatment as a part of a different management program.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective comparative study where the neonatal outcomes of 71 untreated human platelet antigen-1a-alloimmunized pregnancies in Norway during a 20-year period was compared with 403 intravenous-immunoglobulin-treated pregnancies identified through a recent systematic review. We stratified analyses on the basis of whether the mothers belonged to high- or low-risk pregnancies. Therefore, only women who previously had a child with fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia were included.

RESULTS

Two neonates with brain bleeds were identified from 313 treated low-risk pregnancies (0.6%; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-2.3). There were no neonates born with intracranial hemorrhage of 64 nontreated, low-risk mothers (0.0%; 95% confidence interval, 0.0-5.7). Thus, no significant difference was observed in the neonatal outcome between immunoglobulin-treated and untreated low-risk pregnancies. Among high-risk mothers, 5 of 90 neonates from treated pregnancies were diagnosed with intracranial hemorrhage (5.6%; 95% confidence interval, 2.4-12.4) compared with 2 of 7 neonates from nontreated pregnancies (29%; 95% confidence interval, 8.2-64.1; P=.08).

CONCLUSION

The most reliable data hitherto for the evaluation of intravenous immunoglobulins treatment in low-risk pregnancies is shown herein. We did not find evidence that omitting antenatal intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in low-risk pregnancies increases the risk of neonatal intracranial hemorrhage.

Antenatal management in fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review

Several strategies can be used to manage fetal or neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) in subsequent pregnancies. Serial fetal blood sampling (FBS) and intrauterine platelet transfusions (IUPT), as well as weekly maternal IV immunoglobulin infusion (IVIG), with or without additional corticosteroid therapy, are common options, but optimal management has not been determined. The aim of this systematic review was to assess antenatal treatment strategies for FNAIT. Four randomized controlled trials and 22 nonrandomized studies were included. Pooling of results was not possible due to considerable heterogeneity. Most studies found comparable outcomes regarding the occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage, regardless of the antenatal management strategy applied; FBS, IUPT, or IVIG with or without corticosteroids. There is no consistent evidence for the value of adding steroids to IVIG. FBS or IUPT resulted in a relatively high complication rate (consisting mainly of preterm emergency cesarean section) of 11% per treated pregnancy in all studies combined. Overall, noninvasive management in pregnant mothers who have had a previous neonate with FNAIT is effective without the relatively high rate of adverse outcomes seen with invasive strategies. This systematic review suggests that first-line antenatal management in FNAIT is weekly IVIG administration, with or without the addition of corticosteroids.

Fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: The questions that still remain

Fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FMAIT) occurs when maternal antibodies are formed to fetal platelet antigens, leading to thrombocytopenia and hemorrhagic complications. The diagnosis is frequently made only after a major hemorrhagic event has occurred during a pregnancy. Identifying patients at risk remains difficult, and the optimal treatment regimen remains to be determined.

The management of feto-maternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: Report of three cases

We report herein three cases of severe fetal thrombocytopenia due to anti-human platelet antigen (HPA)- 1a maternal antibodies. The first and the third cases were diagnosed on the basis of previously affected siblings and treated successfully by maternal intravenous human immunoglobulins and corticosteroids. In the second case an unexpected neonatal thrombocytopenia was found after birth without previously affected siblings and treated subsequently with intravenous immunoglobulins. Our experience supports a switch from an invasive management, including early FBS (fetal blood sampling) and platelet transfusions, to a more cautious approach. Also in severe HPA-1a alloimmunization and in 'high risk' fetuses, prenatal maternal treatment could be performed, without previous FBS, only on the basis of a risk score defined by sibling history and parents' genotypes.

[Is a non-invasive management allowed for maternofetal alloimmune thrombocytopenia? Experience over a 10-year period]

OBJECTIVES

Our purpose was to study a non-invasive management of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FMAIT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1996 and 2005, 18 women were treated. The population was divided into 2 groups: patients with a history of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) in the older sibling received weekly intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy to the mother (1 g/kg per week) without initial cordocentesis whereas patients with a history of neonatal thrombocytopenia did not undergo any treatment.

RESULTS

All pregnancies with a previous FMAIT were monitored with serial ultrasound scans without cordecentesis. 15 patients had HPA-1, 2 HPA-3 and 1 HPA-5 immunizations. Weekly intravenous immunoglobulin therapy was administered in 5 patients with a history of ICH in the older sibling. Two of these delivered thrombocytopenic children; one had a platelet count < 50 x 10(9)/l. For the 13 women (one twin) who had a sibling with neonatal thrombocytopenia, 11/14 newborns had a platelet count < 50 x 10(9)/l. Predelivery fetal blood sampling were performed in 8/18 pregnancies. The neonatal periods of the 19 children were uncomplicated and no ICHs were observed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that a non-invasive strategy avoiding serial cordocentesis may be an effective therapy in patients who are at risk of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia.

The evidence base for fetal medicine

This chapter looks at the evidence base for the practice of fetal medicine and surgery. There is very little good-quality research and much activity is based on case reports and series. However, the philosophy of evidence-based practice is now accepted and new randomized trials are being published in the literature (e.g. fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion for congenital diaphragmatic hernia and laser treatment of the twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome). Many well established techniques would not be suitable for randomized trials but, as new techniques related to established practice are introduced (e.g. middle cerebral artery Doppler assessment), well-designed trials are essential to ensure they are safe, clinically useful and at least as good as standard practice. In this unique area of medicine, where ethical and emotional issues interplay with clinical practice, it is important not to introduce exciting techniques without solid evidence that they are beneficial both in the short and the long term.