Recurrent pregnancy loss in a patient with anti-Rh17

BACKGROUND

Rh is one of the most important blood group systems in transfusion medicine. The two homologous genes RHD and RHCE are located on chromosome 1p36.11 and encode for RhD and RhCE proteins, respectively. Complex genetic polymorphisms result in a variety of antigenic expression of D, C, E, c, and e. Here, we describe a case of a young female with D-- who developed anti-Rh17 secondary to blood transfusion and had signs of haemolytic disease of the fetus and fetal death in five consecutive pregnancies.

CASE DESCRIPTION

EDTA-whole blood samples were collected from the patient, husband and eight siblings for blood grouping, phenotyping, and red cell antibody screening. Extracted DNA was genotyped by SNP-microarray and massively parallel sequencing (MPS) with targeted blood group exome sequencing. Copy number variation analysis was performed to identify structural variants in the RHD and RHCE. Routine phenotyping showed all family members were D+. The patient's red blood cells were C-E-c-e-, Rh17- and Rh46- and had anti-Rh17 and anti-e antibodies. MPS showed the patient carried a wildtype RHD sequence and homozygous for RHCE (1)-D (2-9)-CE (10) hybrid gene predicted to express a D-- phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

Our patient had a rare D-- phenotype and confirmed to have RHCE/RHD hybrid gene with replacement of 2-9 exons of RHCE by RHD sequences. Unfortunately, our patient developed anti-Rh17 and anti-e antibodies due to blood transfusion and suffered fetal demise in her very first pregnancy. The adverse outcomes could have been prevented by active prenatal management.

Antenatal intravenous immunoglobulins in pregnancies at risk of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: comparison of neonatal outcome in treated and nontreated pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Maternal alloantibodies to human platelet antigen-1a can cause severe intracranial hemorrhage in a fetus or newborn. Although never evaluated in placebo-controlled clinical trials, most Western countries use off-label weekly administration of high-dosage intravenous immunoglobulin in all pregnant women with an obstetrical history of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. In Norway, antenatal intravenous immunoglobulin is only recommended in pregnancies wherein a previous child had intracranial hemorrhage (high-risk) and is generally not given in other human platelet antigen-1a alloimmunized pregnancies (low-risk).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the frequency of anti-human platelet antigen-1a-induced intracranial hemorrhage in pregnancies at risk treated with intravenous immunoglobulin vs pregnancies not receiving this treatment as a part of a different management program.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective comparative study where the neonatal outcomes of 71 untreated human platelet antigen-1a-alloimmunized pregnancies in Norway during a 20-year period was compared with 403 intravenous-immunoglobulin-treated pregnancies identified through a recent systematic review. We stratified analyses on the basis of whether the mothers belonged to high- or low-risk pregnancies. Therefore, only women who previously had a child with fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia were included.

RESULTS

Two neonates with brain bleeds were identified from 313 treated low-risk pregnancies (0.6%; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-2.3). There were no neonates born with intracranial hemorrhage of 64 nontreated, low-risk mothers (0.0%; 95% confidence interval, 0.0-5.7). Thus, no significant difference was observed in the neonatal outcome between immunoglobulin-treated and untreated low-risk pregnancies. Among high-risk mothers, 5 of 90 neonates from treated pregnancies were diagnosed with intracranial hemorrhage (5.6%; 95% confidence interval, 2.4-12.4) compared with 2 of 7 neonates from nontreated pregnancies (29%; 95% confidence interval, 8.2-64.1; P=.08).

CONCLUSION

The most reliable data hitherto for the evaluation of intravenous immunoglobulins treatment in low-risk pregnancies is shown herein. We did not find evidence that omitting antenatal intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in low-risk pregnancies increases the risk of neonatal intracranial hemorrhage.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in preterm premature rupture of membranes at 24-31 weeks' gestation: perinatal and 2-year outcomes in the EPIPAGE-2 cohort

Objective

To compare different antibiotic prophylaxis administered after preterm premature rupture of membranes to determine whether any were associated with differences in obstetric and/or neonatal outcomes and/or neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of corrected age.

Design

Prospective, nationwide, population‐based EPIPAGE‐2 cohort study of preterm infants.

Setting

France, 2011.

Sample

We included 492 women with a singleton pregnancy and a diagnosis of preterm premature rupture of membranes at 24–31 weeks. Exclusion criteria were contraindication to expectant management or indication for antibiotic therapy other than preterm premature rupture of membranes. Antibiotic prophylaxis was categorised as amoxicillin (n = 345), macrolide (n = 30), third‐generation cephalosporin (n = 45) or any combinations covering Streptococcus agalactiae and >90% of Escherichia coli (n = 72), initiated within 24 hours after preterm premature rupture of membranes.

Methods

Population‐averaged robust Poisson models.

Main Outcome Measures

Survival at discharge without severe neonatal morbidity, 2‐year neurodevelopment.

Results

With amoxicillin, macrolide, third‐generation cephalosporin and combinations, 78.5%, 83.9%, 93.6% and 86.0% of neonates were discharged alive without severe morbidity. The administration of third‐generation cephalosporin or any E. coli‐targeting combinations was associated with improved survival without severe morbidity (adjusted risk ratio 1.25 [95% confidence interval 1.08–1.45] and 1.10 [95 % confidence interval 1.01–1.20], respectively) compared with amoxicillin. We evidenced no increase in neonatal sepsis related to third‐generation cephalosporin‐resistant pathogen.

Conclusion

In preterm premature rupture of membranes at 24–31 weeks, antibiotic prophylaxis based on third‐generation cephalosporin may be associated with improved survival without severe neonatal morbidity when compared with amoxicillin, with no evidence of increase in neonatal sepsis related to third‐generation cephalosporin‐resistant pathogen.

Tweetable Abstract

Antibiotic prophylaxis after PPROM at 24–31 weeks: 3rd‐generation cephalosporins associated with improved neonatal outcomes.

Antibiotic prophylaxis after PPROM at 24–31 weeks: 3rd‐generation cephalosporins associated with improved neonatal outcomes.

Antepartum vaginal bleeding: characteristics associated with delivery within seven days

Objective: To identify maternal and/or fetal characteristics associated with delivery within seven days for patients who present with vaginal bleeding in the antepartum period.Methods: This is a retrospective chart review performed at a community-academic tertiary care center. Three hundred and twenty-two consecutive charts associated with admission for vaginal bleeding during pregnancy between January 2015 and May 2020 were reviewed. One hundred and twenty-six women were included based on singleton gestation, gestational age 24 0/7 - 36 6/7 weeks, self-limited vaginal bleeding, vital sign stability (blood pressure >100/60 mmHg, heart rate >60 beats per minute, respiratory rate <20 breaths per minute), absence of signs of labor, no known placenta previa/accreta, recent vaginal intercourse, or trauma. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were compared using Fisher's exact and two-sample t-tests tests when appropriate. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were fitted to predict delivery within 7 days.Results: Thirty-four percent of women who presented with light vaginal bleeding delivered within seven days, with a mean of 2.6 days (n = 44/126). Patients without evidence of labor but with sterile vaginal exam (SVE) >2 cm on admission were 14 times more likely to deliver within 7 days than SVE ≤ 2 cm (AOR 14.49, 95% CI 3.33-63.03); however, 35.2% of women with SVE ≤ 2 cm still delivered in this timeframe (n = 12/34). Of the 59 patients who had cervical lengths (CL) performed, those with CL ≤2.5 cm were 4.22 times more likely to deliver within 7 days (OR 4.22, 95% CI 1.10-16.20). Seventy-eight percent of the patients who had CL >2.5 cm and SVE 0-1 cm went on to deliver >14 days from their initial bleeds (n = 18/23).Conclusion: Patients who present with self-limited vaginal bleeding and SVE > 2 cm should be admitted for antenatal steroids. Prolonged inpatient observation beyond the typical steroid window of 48-72 h should be dependent on the individual patient. Given that CL ≤2.5 cm and regular contractions are known risk factors for preterm delivery, these characteristics alone may also warrant extended inpatient observation, though even in conjunction with vaginal bleeding, neither was a significant predictor for delivery in our study. In contrast, the majority of patients with vaginal bleeding and SVE <2 cm delivered >14 days after their initial bleeds and are likely eligible for shorter periods of observation.

Fetal growth restriction: underdiagnosed condition with non-optimal screening

BACKGROUND

Fetal Growth restriction (FGR) is the pathological failure of a fetus to reach its biologically determined growth potential. Detection of FGR fetuses is a universally agreed key objective of antenatal care. Antenatal detection of FGR has undeniable benefits, juggling between intensive fetal surveillance and optimized timing of delivery; it reduces adverse perinatal outcomes by up to four-fold. However, FGR is still widely underdiagnosed. We aimed to identify the prevalence of FGR diagnosis in our wards and study the impact of the 2013 published French guidelines on the detection rate of FGR. The secondary objective aimed to highlight the factors of suboptimal screening in the population of non-diagnosed FGR fetuses and emphasize the screening method that led to antenatal diagnosis of FGR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study at a single tertiary maternity center in Lyon-France, the Femme Mère Enfant Hospital, including the exhaustive population of FGR born after 24 + 0 weeks of gestation from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2017. FGR was defined combining the neonatal and antenatal consensus-based definitions for early and late FGR in absence of congenital anomalies, excluding small for gestational age fetuses. For all FGR fetuses, we compared the antenatal detection rate of FGR during 2011-2013 to 2015-2017, since the French guidelines were published in December 2013. When FGR fetuses underwent an antenatal diagnosis of FGR, we retrospectively collected the characteristics that led to the diagnosis. When fetuses were not diagnosed as FGR, we retrospectively reviewed the implementation of the recommended screening method, enabling to evaluate whether screening was optimal or not. Statistical analysis was performed in July 2018, and statistical significance was regarded as a p-value <.05.

RESULTS

Over the seven-year period, and among 31,052 newborns, 1020 (3.3%) infants were identified as FGR and met the inclusion criteria. The detection rate of FGR was similar before and after publication of the French Guidelines related to FGR in 2013. Indeed, 50.8% (201/395) FGR were diagnosed between 2011 and 2013 versus 52.6% (245/465) between 2015 and 2017 (p = .59). In the population of non-diagnosed FGR infants, screening was suboptimal in 80%. Symphysis-fundal height (SFH) was not measured in 10.7%, with no difference before and after 2014 (7.3 versus 11.8% p = .11). Ultrasound examination for fetal biometry had not been prescribed in spite of abnormal SFH in 47.7% of undiagnosed FGR infants. Diagnosis has been missed in 11.5% of infants because of misinterpretation of the estimated fetal weight's centile.

CONCLUSION

FGR is widely underdiagnosed. However, the limited performances can partially be explained by the regular misuse of screening method in clinical practice. Despite the systematic third trimester ultrasound screening, the detection rate of FGR was similar to the one reported in the medical literature. The timing of routine third trimester ultrasound in low-risk women may be rethought.

Management and outcomes of pregnancy with or without lupus nephritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although it is well established that systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) negatively affects pregnancy outcomes, there is insufficient evidence on the effect of lupus nephritis (LN) on antenatal management and pregnancy outcomes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association of LN with management and pregnancy outcomes in SLE patients.

Methods

Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov were carefully searched for relevant English and Chinese language studies. A total of 2,987 articles were reviewed. Data were extracted that compared management and pregnancy outcomes in SLE pregnant women with LN vs without LN. Risk of bias was assessed by a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the STROBE checklist. Combined odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were obtained and sensitivity analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

Results

Sixteen studies, including 1,760 pregnant patients with SLE, were included. Gestational hypertension (OR=5.65, 95% CI=2.94–10.84), preeclampsia (OR=2.84, 95% CI=1.87–4.30), SLE flare (OR=2.66, 95% CI=1.51–4.70), renal flare (OR=15.18, 95% CI=5.89–39.14), proteinuria (OR=8.86, 95% CI=4.75–16.52), and hypocomplementemia (OR=2.86, 95% CI=1.68–4.87) were significantly affected in pregnant women with LN. Anti-Sjögren’s syndrome-related antigen A/Ro autoantibodies were negatively associated with pregnant women with LN (OR=0.57, 95% CI=0.33–0.98). Pregnant women with LN presented a significant decrease in live births (OR=0.62, 95% CI=0.49–0.80) and a significant increase in preterm births (OR=1.92, 95% CI=1.49–2.49) and fetal growth restriction (OR=1.43, 95% CI=1.08–1.91). Regarding antenatal management, steroids (OR=2.48, 95% CI=1.59–3.87) and immunosuppressant treatment (OR=6.77, 95% CI=3.30–13.89) were more frequently used in women with LN.

Conclusion

This review identified a significant association between the aforementioned outcomes and SLE pregnant patients with LN. In patients with SLE, LN increased the risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes and the use of medication. Therefore, special treatment and close monitoring should be allocated to pregnant women with LN.