Not the presence but the amount of clonal DNA detectable in remission of acute myeloid leukemia is predictive for relapse

Expression of MAC-1 (CD11b) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with an unfavorable prognosis

There is evidence to suggest, that cellular adhesion molecules and receptors could play a role in leukemia, e.g., through altered adhesive qualities of leukemic blasts. We have studied the expression of the beta2-integrin Mac-1 (CD11b) on mononuclear cells in 48 patients with AML at first diagnosis by flow cytometry using a direct fluorescein-conjugated antibody. A case was defined as positive if more than 20% of the cells expressed Mac-1. Within the FAB types, we observed a high expression rate in cases with M5 (100% MAC-1+ cases, 73% MAC-1+ cells), M4 (75% MAC-1+ cases, 48% MAC-1+ cells) and in cases with FAB-M1 with 71% MAC-1+ cases and 29% MAC-1+ cells. Separating our patients' cohort in cytogenetic risk groups, we could detect significant higher proportions of MAC-1+, cases (88% vs. 27%, P = 0.005) and cells (51% vs. 16%, P = 0.015) with poor cytogenetic risk compared to the favorable risk group. For clinical evaluations only patients treated according to the protocols of the German AML Cooperative Group (AML-CG) were included (n = 29, cases with AML-M3 were excluded). More MAC-1+ cases and cells were found in the "non-responders" group (n = 8) compared to the "responders" group (n = 24). We can conclude that AML cases with high MAC-1 expression are characterized by a worse prognosis. Evaluation of MAC-1 expression in AML might therefore contribute clinically important data with respect to develop new therapies that influence the interactions between integrins like MAC-1 on leukemic cells and endothelial or immunoreactive cells.

Expression of poliovirus receptor-related proteins PRR1 and PRR2 in acute myeloid leukemia: first report of surface marker analysis, contribution to diagnosis, prognosis and implications for future therapeutical strategies

Poliovirus receptor-related (PRR) proteins belong to the Nectin-adhesion molecules' group, are expressed on endothelial cells and on CD34(+) stem cells and mediate the organization of endothelial and epithelial junctions. There is evidence to suggest, that those receptors could have a role in leukemia. We have studied the expression of PRR molecules PRR1 and PRR2 on mononuclear bone marrow (BM) cells of 55 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) at first diagnosis by FACS-analysis using directly Phycoerythrin-labeled markers (PRR1 clone R1.302.12; PRR2 clone R2.477.1) in combination with other Fluorescein conjugated antibodies to evaluate the blast phenotype in AML. The leukemic gate included blasts and residual monocytes and lymphocytes. A case was defined as positive, if more than 20% of the gated cells expressed the regarding receptor. We could demonstrate, that on average 35% PRR1(+) or 45% PRR2(+) cells in AML were found. Within FAB-types we observed a high PRR1 expression in cases with M3 and M4 and lowest expressions in M0 and M5; a high PRR2 expression was found in cases with M3, M4, M5 and M1 and lowest expressions in M0 and M2. Separating our patients' cohorts in cytogenetic risk groups we could detect a significant higher proportion of PRR1(+) cases (73% vs. 25% of cases, P = 0.009) or PRR1(+) cells (57% vs. 18% of cases, P = 0.001) in the cytogenetic favorable risk vs. poor risk group (75% vs. 32% PRR2(+) cases). Moreover cut-off-values with a maximum probability for a significant differentiation between cases with higher or lower levels of these markers could be found: cases with >78% PRR1(+) and cases with >77% PRR2(+) cells were characterized by a tendency for longer relapse free survival times. Qui-square analyses showed, that 3 of 4 cases with FAB-type M3 (P = 0.03) or a favorable karyotype (P = 0.04) were found in the group with >7% PRR1(+) cells, due to only few cases available a similar correlation, however, could not be found in cases with >78% PRR2(+) cells. We can conclude, that blasts in AML regularly express PRR1 and PRR2. Cases with a high expression of PRR1 or PRR2 are characterized by a more favorable prognosis. With respect to the individual PRR-status the benefit of biological response modifiers as priming agents, differentiation mediators or factors influencing cellular metabolisms inducing factors can be discussed under a new point of view.

High expression of costimulatory molecules correlates with low relapse-free survival probability in acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

Costimulatory molecules such as lymphocyte function-associated antigen (LFA)-1 (CD11a), LFA-3 (CD58), intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 (CD54), neuronal cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) (CD56), B7-1 (CD80), or B7-2 (CD86) are important regulatory elements in healthy immunological cascades, but their role in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has only been rarely investigated. We studied their expression on mononuclear bone marrow (BM) cells from 105 patients with AML at initial diagnosis and evaluated their prognostic significance. Fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analyses were performed using antibodies directly conjugated with fluorescein. A BM sample was considered positive if more than 20% of the cells in the blast containing gate expressed the respective marker. The surface expression of CD11a (27 of 29 cases positive with an average of 71% positive blasts; 27(+)/29, 71%), CD54 (23(+)/33, 37%), CD56 (24(+)/93, 20%), CD58 (29(+)/29, 95%), CD80 (13(+)/28, 30%), and CD86 (19(+)/29, 39%) was measured. The expression of these markers in different French-American-British (FAB) classification types (M0-M5) was heterogeneous, except for CD56, which showed a higher proportion of positive cells in monocytic subtypes of AML. In addition, cases with a "poor risk" karyotype as well as patients succumbing to "early death" after double induction therapy according to the AML Cooperative Group (CG) protocol were characterized by a high expression of CD56. Relapse-free survival analyses demonstrated that patients with more than 8% CD56(+) cells in the BM relapsed significantly sooner. CD54 was preferentially expressed in AML M4(eo) and in addition in "favorable" cytogenetic risk groups and in cases that had responded to AML-CG therapy. Only very high proportions (>60%) of CD54(+) cells were associated with a lower probability for relapse-free survival. CD80 and CD86 expressions were similar in all FAB types. Patients who had responded to AML-CG therapy showed higher CD80 proportions and lower CD86 proportions compared to the "nonresponder" group. Whereas cases with more than 15% CD80(+) cells had a significantly lower probability for relapse-free survival, only cases with more than 65% CD86(+) were characterized by a significantly lower probability for relapse-free survival. Expression profiles of CD11a and CD58 were not associated with specific FAB types or prognostically relevant groups. We can conclude: (1) Expression of costimulatory molecules in AML is very variable. This reflects the great diversity of immunophenotypes in AML. (2) CD56 is mainly expressed in monocytic subtypes of AML. CD56(+) subtypes of AML seem to be a separate entity with a worse prognosis independent of the karyotype. (3) High expression of some costimulatory molecules correlates with a worse prognosis concerning relapse-free survival times.

Expression and prognostic value of hemopoietic cytokine receptors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): implications for future therapeutical strategies

OBJECTIVES

Hemopoietic cytokines regulate hemopoietic cell functions via specific cell surface receptors. There is evidence to suggest, that those receptors (R) could play a role in leukemia with respect to cell differentiations and its regulation, prognosis, and pathobiology. Knowledge of individual cytokine receptor (CKR) profiles could provide new discoveries about CKR-supported therapeutic considerations.

METHODS

We have studied the expression of CKR on mononuclear bone marrow (BM) cells of 89 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) at first diagnosis, three patients at relapse or with persisting AML and eight healthy probands by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis using directly fluorescein-conjugated antibodies: CD114 (hG-CSF-R), CD116 (hGM-CSF-R), CD117 (hSCF-R), CD123 (hIL-3-R), CD130 (gp130subunit), CD135 (hFL-R). A case was defined as positive, if more than 20% of the cells expressed the regarding CKR.

RESULTS

All investigated CKR were more frequently expressed in AML-samples than in healthy BM-samples, except CD130, which was only expressed on 5-6% of AML-blasts in all and with only one healthy BM-sample being CD130(+). Within the French-American-British (FAB) types we observed a maturation- and lineage (granulocytic/monocytic)-committed expression profile. Monocytic subtypes (FAB-type M4/M5) showed significantly more GM-CSF-R(+) (P = 0.001) and FL-R(+) (P = 0.001) and significantly less stem cell factor-R (SCF-R(+)) (P = 0.02) cases. Highest proportions of G-CSF-R(+) blasts were observed in FAB-type M3. In undifferentiated leukemias (FAB-type M1, M2) high amounts of SCF-R(+), IL-3-R(+), and FL-R(+) blasts could be detected. FL-R was the only CKR, which was positive in FAB-type M0 (n = 2). No differences in CKR-expression were detected between primary (p) and secondary (s). Separating our patient cohorts in cytogenetic risk groups we could detect a significant higher proportion of G-CSF-R(+) blasts in the cytogenetic good risk group than in the bad risk group (P = 0.027), but G-CSF-R-expression did not correlate with remission-rate or relapse-free survival probability of the patients. For clinical evaluation only patients treated by the AML-CG-protocol, were included (n = 53). There were no differences of CKR-expression in the responder and non-responder group, however, significant lower relapse-free survival probabilities for patients with more than 85.5% FL-R(+) (P = 0.001) and more than 45.5% SCF-R(+) blasts were found (P = 0.02). Patients with more than 32.5% IL-3-R(+) cells also showed a tendency to a lower relapse-free survival probability (P = 0.26), whereas patients with more than 33% GM-CSF-R(+) (P = 0.06) and patients with more than 52% G-CSF-R(+) (P = 0.175) blasts tended to have a higher relapse-free survival probability.

CONCLUSION

We can conclude, that CKR-expression in AML is maturation- and lineage-committed and the proportions of especially early acting CKR have influence on relapse-free survival probability of AML-patients, independently of the karyotype. With respect to the individual CKR status the benefit of cytokines as priming agents, as agents to treat neutropenia or to influence the metabolism of chemotherapy can be discussed under new points of view.

Low l -selectin (CD62L) expression in acute myeloid leukemia correlates with a bad cytogenetic risk

OBJECTIVES

Interactions between hemopoietic cells and the stromal microenvironment or immunoreactive cells are mediated by specific cell surface receptors. The expression of those molecules may alter the adhesive qualities (mobility and homing) as well as immune response behavior of leukemic blasts. L-Selectin (CD62L) is suggested to play a role in the redistribution and homing of hemopoietic progenitor cells to the bone marrow (BM). Down-regulation of L-selectin is responsible for mobilization of blasts from the BM into the circulation and ligation of L-selectin stimulates proliferation of progenitor cells. This could have an influence on the process of leukemia.

METHOD

We have studied the expression of L-selectin on mononuclear BM cells of 36 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients at first diagnosis by FACS analysis using a directly fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugated antibody (clone DRE G56).

RESULTS

On average the patients presented with 88% blasts in the BM. The expression tended to be higher in primary (p) AML compared with secondary (s) AML. L-Selectin was very heterogenously expressed in all FAB groups. Highest expression was found in cases with AML-M4 with four of nine cases presenting with an inv(16) karyotype. Separating our patient cohort in cytogenetic risk groups we could detect a significantly higher expression of L-selectin in cases with a 'good risk' karyotype and a very low expression in cases with a 'bad risk' karyotype (P = 0.037). Comparing patients who achieved remission after double induction therapy (responders) with patients who showed persisting disease (non-responders) we found a higher percentage of L-selectin+ cases or cells in the responder group than in the non-responder group, although the differences were not significant because of only five cases in the 'non-responder' group. Evaluating cut-off points greatest differences in relapse-free survival probabilities were found in patients who presented with > or = 30% L-selectin+ BM cells compared with cases with < 30%: 86% of cases with > or = 30% L-selectin+ cells were still in remission after a mean follow up time of only 8 months compared with only 46% in the group with < 30% L-selectin+ cells.

CONCLUSIONS

We can conclude that (i) expression of L-selectin on AML blasts is variable. This reveals the great diversitiy of immunophenotypes in AML and might contribute to identify individual blast phenotypes in order to detect minimal residual disease in remission. (ii) Low L-selectin expression correlates with a bad cytogenetic risk, with a lower probability to achieve remission and with a shorter relapse-free survival time. This might reflect a decreased homing of the blasts to the BM as well as an impaired cytotoxic T-cell reaction against leukemic cells. The expression of L-selectin on leukemic blasts might be influenced by different cytokine therapies (e.g. with interferon alpha) and this might result in an altered hematologic reconstitution after cytotoxic therapies as well as in an altered immunologic recognition of blasts.