Impact of high-dose interferon induction and ribavirin therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C relapsing after or not responding to interferon monotherapy

Interferon for interferon nonresponding and relapsing patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

The widely-accepted treatment outcome for chronic hepatitis C is the sustained viral response (that is, no measurable viral RNA in blood six months after treatment). However, this surrogate outcome (as well as the previously employed biochemical and histologic ones) has never been validated. This situation exists because there are very few randomized clinical trials that have used clinical events (mortality or manifestations of decompensated cirrhosis) as outcomes, because those clinical events only occur after many years of infection. Patients in whom initial therapy fails to produce sustained viral responses do become potential candidates for retreatment; some of these individuals are not candidates for ribavirin or protease inhibitors and consideration could be given to retreatment with interferon alone.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of interferon monotherapy retreatment in chronic hepatitis C patients and to validate the currently employed surrogate outcomes in this group of patients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until 16 August 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials comparing interferon versus placebo or no treatment in chronic hepatitis C nonresponders and relapsers to previous interferon.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcomes were mortality (all-cause and hepatic), quality of life, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were liver-related morbidity, sustained viral responses, biochemical responses, histologic improvements, and costs. We used both fixed-effect and random-effects model meta-analyses, reporting only the former if no difference existed.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven trials were identified. Two of them were at low risk of bias (the HALT-C and EPIC3 trials) and included 1676 patients. Both of these trials addressed the role of long-term low-dose pegylated interferon therapy in patients with severe fibrosis (demonstrated on liver biopsy) and were designed to assess the clinical outcomes. The remaining five trials included 300 patients and were at high risk of bias. Based on all trials reporting the outcomes, no significant difference was observed in either all-cause mortality (78/843 (9.3%) versus 62/867 (7.2%); risk ratio (RR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 to 1.79; 3 trials) or hepatic mortality (41/532 (7.7%) versus 40/552 (7.2%); RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.63; 2 trials); however, when only the two trials at low risk of bias were combined, all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the recipients of the pegylated interferon (78/828 (9.4%) versus 57/848 (6.7%); RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.96) although trial sequential analysis could not exclude the possibility of random error. There was less variceal bleeding in the recipients of the interferon (4/843 (0.5%) versus 18/867 (2.1%); RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.67; 3 trials), although again trial sequential analysis could not exclude the presence of a type I error and the effect could not be confirmed in a random-effects model meta-analysis. No significant differences were seen with regard to the development of ascites, encephalopathy, hepatocellular carcinoma, or the need for liver transplantation. One trial reported quality of life data; the pain score was significantly worse in the recipients of the pegylated interferon. Adverse effects tended to be more common in the interferon recipients; the ones that were significantly more common included hematologic complications, infections, flu-like symptoms, and rash. The recipients of interferon had significantly more sustained viral responses (20/557 (3.6%) versus 1/579 (0.2%); RR 15.38, 95% CI 2.93 to 80.71; 4 trials) and a type I error was excluded by trial sequential analysis. The METAVIR activity score also improved (36/55 (65%) versus 20/46 (43.5%); RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.18; 2 trials). No significant differences were seen with regard to histologic fibrosis assessments.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The clinical data were limited to patients with histologic evidence of severe fibrosis who were retreated with pegylated interferon. In this scenario, retreatment with interferon did not appear to provide significant clinical benefit and, when only the trials at low risk of bias were considered, retreatment for several years may even have increased all-cause mortality. Such treatment also produced adverse events. On the other hand, the treatment did result in improvement in some surrogate outcomes, namely sustained viral responses and histologic evidence of inflammation. Interferon monotherapy retreatment cannot be recommended for these patients. No clinical data are available for patients with less severe fibrosis. The sustained viral response cannot be used as a surrogate marker for hepatitis C treatment in this clinical setting with low sustained viral response rates and needs to be validated in others in which higher sustained viral response rates are reported.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in long-term sustained virological responders following antiviral combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C

Antiviral treatment results in a sustained virologic response (SVR) in 50-75% of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Long-term follow up studies have observed ongoing SVR in the overwhelming majority of them. Thus chronic hepatitis C is considered 'cured' if an SVR is achieved. Consequently, it is expected that in sustained virologic responders long-term complications of hepatatic C virus (HCV) related chronic liver disease including hepatocellular carcinoma are eliminated or have a decreased incidence. We report on five patients (three from Austria, two from USA) who developed hepatocellular carcinoma during follow up (3-6 years) after achieving SVR. During follow up and at diagnosis all were HCV-RNA neg. None of the patients had other liver diseases. One patient presented with bilateral adrenal metastasis, the remaining four with large hepatic tumours. Three patients were noncirrhotic at the start of treatment at the time of tumour diagnosis. Successful antiviral treatment in HCV patients does not prevent development of hepatocellular carcinoma even in non-cirrhotic livers. Long-term follow up of patients with SVR is mandatory and should include surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Prediction of virologic response in difficult-to-treat chronic hepatitis C patients during high-dose interferon induction therapy

OBJECTIVE

To determine (i) whether early viral kinetics or other markers during a modified treatment regimen are predictors of treatment outcome and (ii) whether fast responders can be treated for 24 weeks, without compromising the sustained virologic response (SVR) rate.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred "difficult-to-treat" chronic hepatitis C patients (46 previous non-responders/relapsers (any genotype), 54 treatment-naive patients genotypes 1 and 4) were treated with triple antiviral induction therapy: amantadine hydrochloride and ribavirin, combined with 6 weeks interferon alfa-2b induction (weeks 1-2: 18 MU/day, weeks 3-4: 9 MU/day, weeks 5-6: 6 MU/day), thereafter combined with weekly peginterferon alfa-2b. Fast responders (>or=3 log(10) HCV RNA decline at week 4) were randomized to 24 or 48 weeks. Slow responders (<3 log(10) HCV RNA decline at week 4) were treated for 48 weeks. Treatment was stopped in patients with detectable HCV RNA at week 24.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients achieved SVR: 28 of 60 fast responders (47%) versus 8 of 32 slow responders (25%, p<0.05). Relapse rates among fast responders treated for 24 or 48 weeks were 27% and 20%, respectively (p=NS). SVR in fast responders was independent of baseline HCV RNA >or= or <600,000 IU/mL. All treatment-naive patients with HCV RNA <5 IU/mL at week 1 or 2 achieved SVR; all treatment-naive patients with HCV RNA >or=5 IU/mL at week 16 became non-SVR. In previous non-responders/relapsers, the predictive value for SVR was 83% if HCV RNA was <5 IU/mL at week 2; all previous non-responders/relapsers with HCV RNA >or=5 IU/mL at week 8 became non-SVR.

CONCLUSIONS

With high-dose interferon induction, SVR and non-SVR can be predicted reliably within 16 weeks. Fast responders can be treated for 24 weeks, and SVR is independent of baseline viral load in fast responders.

Incidence of psychiatric side effects during pegylated interferon- alpha retreatment in nonresponder hepatitis C virus-infected patients

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the incidence of mental disorders using pegylated interferon plus ribavirin retreatment in nonresponder hepatitis C virus-infected patients.

METHOD

The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) was used to evaluate 30 hepatitis C virus-infected interferon-nonresponder patients at baseline and following 4, 12 and 24 weeks of pegylated interferon retreatment.

RESULTS

During the pegylated interferon/ribavirin retreatment, 5(16.6%) patients developed psychiatric side effects: 3(10%) were diagnosed with major depressive disorder, 1(3.3%) had a brief psychotic disorder and 1(3.3%) presented with panic attacks.

CONCLUSION

This is the first prospective study evaluating the incidence of neuropsychiatric side effects during interferon retreatment of hepatitis C virus-infected patients, suggesting that the risk of acquiring serious psychiatric symptoms during retreatment with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) may not be higher than during the first antiviral therapy. This finding challenges the hypothesis that during a second treatment with IFN-alpha, patients with hepatitis C may be at greater risk for neuropsychiatric side effects than naïve patients.

Improving the treatment of hepatitis C infection in the UK

The UK lags behind its European neighbours in the identification and treatment of hepatitis C virus infection. Having recognised this problem, national guidelines are evolving based on detailed examination of clinical evidence. This article reviews recommended treatments for hepatitis C virus infection in the UK, recent advances in the understanding of how to use these treatments and new developments.

Re-treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients after relapse: efficacy of peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kDa) and ribavirin

We conducted a randomized multinational study to determine whether 48 weeks of re-treatment with peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kDa) plus ribavirin would induce a sustained virological response (SVR) in relapsed chronic hepatitis C patients. Patients who had previously relapsed during 24 weeks of untreated follow-up, after having achieved an end-of-treatment virological response with 24 weeks of peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kDa)/ribavirin combination therapy, within a phase III trial, were studied. Although the recommended dosage was the same as that used at the end of the initial trial, adjustments were permitted. Data on serious adverse events, or adverse events that resulted in dose reductions or discontinuations, were collected. Following re-treatment, the overall SVR rate in the 64 patients was 55%. The SVR rates in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and non-1 genotypes were 51% and 63%, respectively. Early (week 12) virological responses were seen in 39 patients (61%) and were predictive of an SVR. Re-treatment was well tolerated. The most frequent adverse events recorded were fatigue (5%) and abdominal pain (3%). Dosages of peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kDa) and/or ribavirin were modified because of adverse events in 3% and 13% of patients, and because of laboratory abnormalities in 23% and 5% of patients, respectively. Thus, a 48-week course of peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kDa) plus ribavirin induces an SVR in 55% of patients who relapsed during follow-up after 24 weeks of combination therapy. Physicians should not hesitate to offer re-treatment to patients who relapse after an initial, 24-week course of combination therapy, or who have prematurely stopped treatment because, for example, of laboratory abnormalities.

Consensus interferon and ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C and failure of previous interferon-alpha therapy

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of consensus interferon (CIFN), a synthetic IFN with optimised in vitro activity, was assessed in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients who had failed the pretreatment with interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) and ribavirin.

METHODS

One hundred and three patients after non-response (n=69) or relapse (n=34) to IFNalpha+/-ribavirin were randomly assigned to high-dose induction (CIFN 27-->9 microg daily for 24 weeks, 9 microg t.i.w. for 24 weeks) or low-dose treatment (CIFN 18 microg t.i.w. for 12 weeks, 9 microg t.i.w. for 36 weeks); each with ribavirin 800 mg/day. Follow-up was 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Non-responder patients treated with high-dose induction had higher early virological response rates (63% vs. 39%, P<0.05). This initial positive effect was lost during the last 24 weeks of treatment yielding sustained virological response (SVR) rates of 26% in both groups. Relapse patients revealed SVR in 70% and 38% in groups A and B (NS). Treatment was well tolerated with side effect-related preterm discontinuations in 8% and 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

CIFN and ribavirin treatment induced considerable SVR rates in patients with non-response or relapse to IFNalpha+/-ribavirin. Viral elimination rates might be further increased by continuous daily administration of CIFN and weight-adjusted ribavirin dosing.

Advances in hepatitis B and C

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hepatitis B and C infections are prevalent around the world and a major health burden due to the associated complications of hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma which occur in the context of chronic infection. Significant advances are being made in assessing and treating infected patients and recent studies are now targeting patients who have failed to respond to previous treatments or who have associated co-morbidities. The purpose of this article to review the recent literature on the subject of hepatitis B and C infections with particular focus on new treatment options, new approaches in patients who have previously failed therapy and in those who have co-morbidity.

RECENT FINDINGS

A large number of studies have been carried out investigating the roles of varying doses, targeting treatment in particular groups and new treatment options in patients infected with hepatitis B and C. Several key findings such as the value of prolonging treatment in patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C infection, the use of pegylated interferon in chronic hepatitis B infection and the emergence of new treatments such as adefovir for resistant hepatitis B infection, as well as treatment of patients co-infected with hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus, have dominated the recent literature. Patients in particular groups such as those who have had liver transplantation or who are immunosuppressed have also received added attention.

SUMMARY

Hepatitis B and C infections are the focus of much current attention with particular regard to new and emerging treatment options which are becoming increasingly focused on varying patient groups.

Retreatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to interferon/ribavirin combination therapy with daily interferon plus ribavirin plus amantadine

There is currently no accepted therapeutic regimen for patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to standard combination treatment with interferon-alpha plus ribavirin. We investigated triple combination treatment with induction dosing of interferon-alpha plus ribavirin plus amantadine in these difficult-to-treat patients. Nonresponders (n = 67), breakthroughs (n = 16) and relapsers (n = 19) to previous interferon/ribavirin combination treatment of at least 6 months were included. For the first 16 weeks, patients received interferon-alpha2a 6 MU daily, ribavirin 800-1200 mg/d, and amantadine 200 mg/d. In cases of undetectable HCV RNA at week 12, treatment was continued with interferon-alpha2a 6 MU every other day and the same doses of ribavirin and amantadine until week 48. In cases of HCV RNA positivity at week 12, treatment was stopped. A total of 102 patients were enrolled (80%: genotype 1, 19%: cirrhosis). HCV RNA was negative in 35/102 patients (34%) at week 12 and in 27/ 102 patients (26%) at the end of treatment. Virological response was sustained in 15/102 patients (15%). On-treatment virological response was higher in previous relapsers/breakthroughs than in previous nonresponders (week 12: 49% vs. 27%, p < 0.05; week 48: 46% vs. 16%, p < 0.01) but no such difference was found for sustained virological response (20% vs. 12%, NS). In conclusion, triple combination treatment with daily interferon-alpha plus ribavirin plus amantadine for 3 months can induce virological response in a considerable number of nonresponders/relapsers to previous dual combination treatment, but the sustained virological response rate remains low.