Therapeutic Hypothermia in Low-Risk Nonpumped Brain-Dead Kidney Donors: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Delayed graft function in kidney-transplant recipients is associated with increased financial cost and patient burden. In donors with high Kidney Donor Profile Index whose kidneys are not pumped, therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to confer a protective benefit against delayed graft function.

Objective

To determine whether hypothermia is superior to normothermia in preventing delayed graft function in low-risk nonpumped kidney donors after brain death.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In a multicenter randomized clinical trial, brain-dead kidney donors deemed to be low risk and not requiring machine perfusion per Organ Procurement Organization protocol were prospectively randomized to hypothermia (34.0-35 °C) or normothermia (36.5-37.5 °C) between August 10, 2017, and May 21, 2020, across 4 Organ Procurement Organizations in the US (Arizona, Upper Midwest, Pacific Northwest, and Texas). The final analysis report is dated June 15, 2022, based on the data set received from the United Network for Organ Sharing on June 2, 2021. A total of 509 donors (normothermia: n = 245 and hypothermia: n = 236; 1017 kidneys) met inclusion criteria over the study period.

Intervention

Donor hypothermia (34.0-35.0 °C) or normothermia (36.5-37.5 °C).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was delayed graft function in the kidney recipients, defined as the need for dialysis within the first week following kidney transplant. The primary analysis follows the intent-to-treat principle.

Results

A total of 934 kidneys were transplanted from 481 donors, of which 474 were randomized to the normothermia group and 460 to the hypothermia group. Donor characteristics were similar between the groups, with overall mean (SD) donor age 34.2 (11.1) years, and the mean donor creatinine level at enrollment of 1.03 (0.53) mg/dL. There was a predominance of Standard Criteria Donors (98% in each treatment arm) with similar low mean (SD) Kidney Donor Profile Index (normothermia: 28.99 [20.46] vs hypothermia: 28.32 [21.9]). Cold ischemia time was similar in the normothermia and hypothermia groups (15.99 [7.9] vs 15.45 [7.63] hours). Delayed graft function developed in 87 of the recipients (18%) in the normothermia group vs 79 (17%) in the hypothermia group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.64-1.33; P = .66).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this study suggest that, in low-risk non-pumped kidneys from brain-dead kidney donors, therapeutic hypothermia compared with normothermia does not appear to prevent delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02525510.

A Machine Learning Prediction Model for Immediate Graft Function After Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

After kidney transplantation (KTx), the graft can evolve from excellent immediate graft function (IGF) to total absence of function requiring dialysis. Recipients with IGF do not seem to benefit from using machine perfusion, an expensive procedure, in the long term when compared with cold storage. This study proposes to develop a prediction model for IGF in KTx deceased donor patients using machine learning algorithms.

METHODS

Unsensitized recipients who received their first KTx deceased donor between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, were classified according to the conduct of renal function after transplantation. Variables related to the donor, recipient, kidney preservation, and immunology were used. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: 70% were assigned to the training and 30% to the test group. Popular machine learning algorithms were used: eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine, Gradient Boosting classifier, Logistic Regression, CatBoost classifier, AdaBoost classifier, and Random Forest classifier. Comparative performance analysis on the test dataset was performed using the results of the AUC values, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F1 score.

RESULTS

Of the 859 patients, 21.7% (n = 186) had IGF. The best predictive performance resulted from the eXtreme Gradient Boosting model (AUC, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.84; sensitivity, 0.64; specificity, 0.78). Five variables with the highest predictive value were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated the possibility of creating a model for the prediction of IGF, enhancing the selection of patients who would benefit from an expensive treatment, as in the case of machine perfusion preservation.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Value for Early Prediction of Delayed Graft Function in Renal Transplantation Patients

OBJECTIVES

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common early complication after kidney transplantation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the early prediction of DGF after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 89 renal transplant recipients were retrospectively enrolled and divided into DGF group or normal graft function (NGF) group according to the allograft function. Conventional Doppler ultrasound and CEUS examination data on the first postoperative day were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The resistive indices of segmental and interlobar artery in the DGF group were significantly higher than those in the NGF group (0.71 ± 0.17 versus 0.63 ± 0.08, P = .006; 0.70 ± 0.16 versus 0.62 ± 0.08, P = .004, respectively). The patients experiencing DGF had significantly lower PI-c (14.7 dB ± 6.1 dB versus 18.5 dB ± 3.3 dB, P = .001) and smaller AUC-c (779.8 ± 375.8 dB·seconds versus 991.0 ± 211.7 dB·seconds, P = .003), as well as significantly lower PI-m (12.6 dB ± 5.9 dB versus 15.9 dB ± 3.9 dB, P = .006), shorter MTT-m (30.7 ± 9.4 seconds versus 36.3 ± 7.1 seconds, P = .01), and smaller AUC-m (P = .007). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that PI-c, AUC-c, and MTT-m were independent risk factors for DGF. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of the combined predicted value (PI-c + MTT-m, PI-c + AUC-c + MTT-m) of DGF incidence were bigger than that of PI-c, AUC-c, or MTT-m.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS parameters of the cortex and medulla have a good value for an early prediction of DGF after renal transplantation.

Toward generalizing the use of artificial intelligence in nephrology and kidney transplantation

With its robust ability to integrate and learn from large sets of clinical data, artificial intelligence (AI) can now play a role in diagnosis, clinical decision making, and personalized medicine. It is probably the natural progression of traditional statistical techniques. Currently, there are many unmet needs in nephrology and, more particularly, in the kidney transplantation (KT) field. The complexity and increase in the amount of data, and the multitude of nephrology registries worldwide have enabled the explosive use of AI within the field. Nephrologists in many countries are already at the center of experiments and advances in this cutting-edge technology and our aim is to generalize the use of AI among nephrologists worldwide. In this paper, we provide an overview of AI from a medical perspective. We cover the core concepts of AI relevant to the practicing nephrologist in a consistent and simple way to help them get started, and we discuss the technical challenges. Finally, we focus on the KT field: the unmet needs and the potential role that AI can play to fill these gaps, then we summarize the published KT-related studies, including predictive factors used in each study, which will allow researchers to quickly focus on the most relevant issues.

Surgical Complications After Deceased Donor Renal Transplant

OBJECTIVES

Deceased donor renal transplant is an accepted treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. We retrospectively analyzed urological and surgical complications and outcomes in our series.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Since 2016, we have performed 263 renal transplants at the Gazi University Transplantation Center, Ankara, and 92 of these were from deceased donors. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of these 92 deceased donor transplants from our database records. There were 45 female and 47 male recipients, and 20 were pediatric recipients. Mean recipient and donor ages were 36 ± 14 and 38 ± 18 years old, respectively. Immunosuppression therapy consisted of steroids, mycophenolate, and calcineurin inhibitors. Induction therapy was 20 mg basiliximab (Simulect) on day 0 and day 4. Antithymocyte globulin (2 mg∕kg) was used in steroid-resistant acute rejection cases.

RESULTS

There were 13 surgical complications (14.1%) after 92 consecutive deceased donor renal transplants, and 4 of these were classified as miscellaneous surgical complications. Four of 9 cases were early, and the rest were classified as late complications. Postoperative early complications were bleeding (n = 2), urine leak (n = 1), and renal artery thrombosis (n = 1). Lymphoceles (n = 4) and urine leak (n = 1) occurred as late complications. Postoperative median follow-up was 78 months, during which 11 grafts (12%) were lost and 7 patients (7.6%) died from sepsis (n = 4), myocardial infarction, aortic dissection, and fungal pneumonia. No patients died from any surgical complications. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates of patients were 98%, 94%, and 94% and for grafts were 97%, 94%, and 88%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite the limited number of deceased donor organs, improvements of surgical techniques at our center have facilitated success with deceased donor renal transplant at rates similar to other successful centers in the world.

Pre-transplant HLA Antibodies and Delayed Graft Function in the Current Era of Kidney Transplantation

Delayed graft function (DGF) occurs in a significant proportion of deceased donor kidney transplant recipients and was associated with graft injury and inferior clinical outcome. The aim of the present multi-center study was to identify the immunological and non-immunological predictors of DGF and to determine its influence on outcome in the presence and absence of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies. 1,724 patients who received a deceased donor kidney transplant during 2008–2017 and on whom a pre-transplant serum sample was available were studied. Graft survival during the first 3 post-transplant years was analyzed by multivariable Cox regression. Pre-transplant predictors of DGF and influence of DGF and pre-transplant HLA antibodies on biopsy-proven rejections in the first 3 post-transplant months were determined by multivariable logistic regression. Donor age ≥50 years, simultaneous pre-transplant presence of HLA class I and II antibodies, diabetes mellitus as cause of end-stage renal disease, cold ischemia time ≥18 h, and time on dialysis >5 years were associated with increased risk of DGF, while the risk was reduced if gender of donor or recipient was female or the reason for death of donor was trauma. DGF alone doubled the risk for graft loss, more due to impaired death-censored graft than patient survival. In DGF patients, the risk of death-censored graft loss increased further if HLA antibodies (hazard ratio HR=4.75, P < 0.001) or donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA, HR=7.39, P < 0.001) were present pre-transplant. In the presence of HLA antibodies or DSA, the incidence of biopsy-proven rejections, including antibody-mediated rejections, increased significantly in patients with as well as without DGF. Recipients without DGF and without biopsy-proven rejections during the first 3 months had the highest fraction of patients with good kidney function at year 1, whereas patients with both DGF and rejection showed the lowest rate of good kidney function, especially when organs from ≥65-year-old donors were used. In this new era of transplantation, besides non-immunological factors, also the pre-transplant presence of HLA class I and II antibodies increase the risk of DGF. Measures to prevent the strong negative impact of DGF on outcome are necessary, especially during organ allocation for presensitized patients.

Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin rapidly decreases in the first week after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Recipient delayed graft function, which is defined as dialysis in the first week after transplantation, is one of the most common early complications after kidney transplantation. This study aimed to evaluate the daily changes in renal function-related biomarkers in the first week post-transplant.

METHODS

A total of 72 kidney transplant recipients were retrospectively included in this study. Clinical and laboratory data were collected daily during the first week post-transplant, including urinary concentrations of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), serum concentrations of NGAL, creatinine, urea nitrogen, uric acid (UA), β2-microglobulin, cystatin C, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in urea nitrogen (P = .375), UA (P = .090), and cystatin C (P = .691), while urinary NGAL (P < .0001), serum NGAL (P < .0001), creatinine (P < .0001), β2-microglobulin (P < .0001), and eGFR (P < .0001) were statistically significant in the first week post-transplant. In comparison with serum NGAL (P < .0001), creatinine (P < .0001), β2-microglobulin (P = .001), and eGFR (P = .001), the change ratios of urinary NGAL changed the most between day 1 and day 2 after renal transplantation, while the changing degree of urinary NGAL showed no significant difference compared with these indicators between day 1 and day 7 after kidney transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Urinary NGAL is a sensitive marker for indicating renal function. Urinary NGAL combined with other markers can be more helpful for evaluating renal function in the first week following kidney transplantation.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of BK Viremia and Clinical Impact of BK Virus Surveillance on Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVES

BK virus is a polyomavirus that can cause nephropathy and graft loss after kidney transplant. The aim of our study was to screen the BK viremia prevalence, to understand the value of the inter-vention for BK virus nephropathy, and to determine the risk factors associated with BK viremia after kidney transplant in our center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our retrospective cross-sectional study included 91 adult kidney transplant recipients who were seen between 2015 and 2017 and who had follow-up from 1 month to over 2 years. BK viremia was evaluated by use of plasma quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The prevalence of BK viremia and the clinical treatments and outcomes of BK virus nephropathy were assessed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of BK viremia was 5.5% (5/91 patients). BK virus nephropathy was confirmed by allograft biopsy in 4.4% (4/91 patients) of all patients. Delayed graft function was found to be an independent risk factor for BK viremia (P < .001). Patients with BK viremia had significantly higher serum creatinine levels (P = .04). Patients who were diagnosed with BK viremia at 1 to 5 years after kidney transplant had higher serum creatinine (P = .02) and uric acid levels (P = .02). After reduction or discontinuation of calcineurin inhibitor, BK virus was cleared in all patients with BK virus nephropathy, with higher level of serum creatinine but no graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed graft function was considered as a risk factor for viremia. Early detection of BK viremia replication is important. The strategy of reduction of immunosuppression was effective for BK virus nephropathy and graft function improvement.

Perioperative-, Recipient-, and Donor-Related Factors Affecting Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Delayed graft function is a frequent complication in deceased-donor kidney transplant, with an incidence ranging from 10% to 50% among different centers; it is also associated with lower graft survival. In this study, we aimed to identify risk factors for delayed graft function, particularly those associated with perioperative management (including cold ischemia time) and nonmodifiable recipient- and donor-related factors. The effects of delayed graft function on graft and patient outcomes were also evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our retrospective analyses included 125 adult patients who underwent deceased-donor kidney transplant. Delayed graft function was diagnosed if at least 1 dialysis treatment was required during the first week posttransplant according to Perico's definition.

RESULTS

Prevalence of delayed graft function was 30.4% (n = 38). Cold ischemia time was significantly prolonged in patients with delayed graft function compared with those without it. Multivariate regression showed that cold ischemia time was the only predictor of delayed graft function. A cutoff of 9 hours and 12 minutes was found as a limit beyond which delayed graft function occurred (sensitivity = 90%; specificity = 29%; area under the curve = 0.68). Greater donor and recipient age and longer pretransplant dialysis time in recipients were associated with occurrence of delayed graft function. In patients with delayed graft function, hospital stay duration was significantly greater and 1-year graft survival was significantly lower.

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts should be focused on limiting cold ischemia time and associated injury to reduce occurrence of delayed graft function and consequently improve long-term graft survival in kidney transplant recipients. Optimization of posttransplant renal function with the help of new technologies, such as pulsatile perfusion, could be crucial for minimization of cold ischemia time.

The transcriptome of the implant biopsy identifies donor kidneys at increased risk of delayed graft function

Improved assessment of donor organ quality at time of transplantation would help in management of potentially usable organs. The transcriptome might correlate with risk of delayed graft function (DGF) better than conventional risk factors. Microarray results of 87 consecutive implantation biopsies taken postreperfusion in 42 deceased (DD) and 45 living (LD) donor kidneys were compared to clinical and histopathology-based scores. Unsupervised analysis separated the 87 kidneys into three groups: LD, DD1 and DD2. Kidneys in DD2 had a greater incidence of DGF (38.1 vs. 9.5%, p < 0.05) than those in DD1. Clinical and histopathological risk scores did not discriminate DD1 from DD2. A total of 1051 transcripts were differentially expressed between DD1 and DD2, but no transcripts separated DGF from immediate graft function (adjusted p < 0.01). Principal components analysis revealed a continuum from LD to DD1 to DD2, i.e. from best to poorest functioning kidneys. Within DD kidneys, the odds ratio for DGF was significantly increased with a transcriptome-based score and recipient age (p < 0.03) but not with clinical or histopathologic scores. The transcriptome reflects kidney quality and susceptibility to DGF better than available clinical and histopathological scoring systems.

Outcome of kidney transplantation using expanded criteria donors and donation after cardiac death kidneys: realities and costs

Expanded criteria donors (ECDs) and donation after cardiac death (DCD) provide more kidneys in the donor pool. However, the financial impact and the long-term benefits of these kidneys have been questioned. From 1998 to 2005, we performed 271 deceased donor kidney transplants into adult recipients. There were 163 (60.1%) SCDs, 44 (16.2%) ECDs, 53 (19.6%) DCDs and 11 (4.1%) ECD/DCDs. The mean follow-up was 50 months. ECD and DCD kidneys had a significantly higher incidence of delayed graft function, longer time to reach serum creatinine below 3 (mg/dL), longer length of stay and more readmissions compared to SCDs. The hospital charge was also higher for ECD, ECD/DCD and DCD kidneys compared to SCDs, primarily due to the longer length of stay and increased requirement for dialysis (70,030 dollars, 72,438 dollars, 72,789 dollars and 47,462 dollars, respectively, p < 0.001). Early graft survival rates were comparable among all groups. However, after a mean follow-up of 50 months, graft survival was significantly less in the ECD group compared to other groups. Although our observations support the utilization of ECD and DCD kidneys, these transplants are associated with increased costs and resource utilization. Revised reimbursement guidelines will be required for centers that utilize these organs.

Short- and long-term outcomes with the use of kidneys and livers donated after cardiac death

The shortage of deceased donor kidneys and livers for transplantation has prompted the use of organs from donors deceased after cardiac death (DCD). We used the UNOS database to examine patient and graft survival following transplantation of DCD organs compared to those following grafts from donors deceased after brain death (DBD; for livers, grafts from donors < 60 years old were labeled '< 60 yrs'). Of 44035 deceased donor kidney transplant recipients, 1177 (3%) received a DCD kidney. There was no difference in patient or graft survival at 5 years (DCD vs. DBD: 81.3% vs. 80.8% and 66.9% vs. 66.5%; p = 0.70 and p = 0.52 respectively). Of 24688-deceased donor liver transplant recipients, 345 (1.4%) were from DCD donors and 20289 (82%) were from '< 60 yrs' DBD donors. Three-year patient and graft survival were inferior in the DCD group (DCD vs. '< 60 yrs' DBD: 77% vs. 80% and 65% vs. 75%; p = 0.016 and p < 0.0001 respectively) but were comparable to current alternatives, '>/= 60 yrs' DBD livers (donor age >/= 60) and split livers. DCD livers are a reasonable option when death is imminent. Our study demonstrates good outcomes using DCD kidneys and livers and encourages their use.

Perioperative fluid management in renal transplantation: a narrative review of the literature

Adequate volume maintenance is essential to prevent acute renal failure during major surgery or to ensure graft function after renal transplantation. The various recommendations on the optimum fluid therapy are based, at best, on sparse evidence only from observational studies. This article reviews the literature on perioperative fluid management in renal transplantation. Crystalloid solutions not exerting any specific side-effects are the first choice for volume replacement in kidney transplantation. The use of colloids should be restricted to patients with severe intravascular volume deficits necessitating high volume restoration. The routine application of albumin, dopamine, and high dose diuretics is no longer warranted. Mannitol given immediately before removal of the vessel clamps reduces the requirement of post-transplant dialysis, but has no effects on graft function in the long term. There is insufficient evidence on the best use of dialysis, but it seems peritoneal dialysis pretransplant is associated with less delayed graft function, whereas the preference of dialysis post-transplant is not yet well-founded. This review article should provide better guidance for fluid management in kidney transplantation until best-evidence guidelines can be established based upon more research.

Urine NGAL and IL-18 are predictive biomarkers for delayed graft function following kidney transplantation

Delayed graft function (DGF) due to tubule cell injury frequently complicates deceased donor kidney transplants. We tested whether urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and interleukin-18 (IL-18) represent early biomarkers for DGF (defined as dialysis requirement within the first week after transplantation). Urine samples collected on day 0 from recipients of living donor kidneys (n = 23), deceased donor kidneys with prompt graft function (n = 20) and deceased donor kidneys with DGF (n = 10) were analyzed in a double blind fashion by ELISA for NGAL and IL-18. In patients with DGF, peak postoperative serum creatinine requiring dialysis typically occurred 2-4 days after transplant. Urine NGAL and IL-18 values were significantly different in the three groups on day 0, with maximally elevated levels noted in the DGF group (p < 0.0001). The receiver-operating characteristic curve for prediction of DGF based on urine NGAL or IL-18 at day 0 showed an area under the curve of 0.9 for both biomarkers. By multivariate analysis, both urine NGAL and IL-18 on day 0 predicted the trend in serum creatinine in the posttransplant period after adjusting for effects of age, gender, race, urine output and cold ischemia time (p < 0.01). Our results indicate that urine NGAL and IL-18 represent early, predictive biomarkers of DGF.

Reduced graft function (with or without dialysis) vs immediate graft function--a comparison of long-term renal allograft survival

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication in cadaveric kidney transplants affecting graft outcome. However, the incidence of DGF differs widely between centres as its definition is very variable. The purpose of this study was to define a parameter for DGF and immediate graft function (IGF) and to compare the graft outcome between these groups at our centre.

METHODS

The renal allograft function of 972 first cadaveric transplants performed between 1990 and 2001 in the Republic of Ireland was examined. The DGF and IGF were defined by a creatinine reduction ratio (CRR) between time 0 of transplantation and day 7 post-transplantation of <70 and >70%, respectively. Recipients with reduced graft function (DGF) not requiring dialysis were defined as slow graft function (SGF) patients. The serum creatinine at 3 months, 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years after transplantation was compared between these groups of recipients. The graft survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years and the graft half-life for DGF, SGF and IGF recipients were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 972 renal transplant recipients, DGF was seen in 102 (10.5%) patients, SGF in 202 (20.8%) recipients and IGF in 668 (68.7%) patients. Serum creatinine levels were significantly different between the three groups at 3 and 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years. Graft survival at 5 years for the DGF patients was 48.5%, 60.5% for SGF recipients and 75% for IGF patients with graft half-life of 4.9, 8.7 and 10.5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study has shown that the CRR at day 7 correlates with renal function up to 5 years post-transplantation and with long-term graft survival. We have also demonstrated that amongst patients with reduced graft function after transplantation, two groups with significantly different outcomes exist.

Impact of obesity on renal transplant outcomes

Obesity is a frequent and important consideration to be taken into account when assessing patient suitability for renal transplantation. In addition, posttransplant obesity continues to represent a significant challenge to health care professionals caring for renal transplant recipients. Despite the vast amount of evidence that exists on the effect of pretransplant obesity on renal transplant outcomes, there are still conflicting views regarding whether obese renal transplant recipients have a worse outcome, in terms of short- and long-term graft survival and patient survival, compared with their non-obese counterparts. It is well established that any association of obesity with reduced patient survival in renal transplant recipients is mediated in part by its clustering with traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia, insulin resistance and posttransplant diabetes mellitus, but what is not understood is what mediates the association of obesity with graft failure. Whether it is the higher incidence of cardiovascular comorbidities jeopardising the graft or factors specific to obesity, such as hyperfiltration and glomerulopathy, that might be implicated, currently remains unknown. It can be concluded, however, that pre- and posttransplant obesity should be targeted as aggressively as the more well-established cardiovascular risk factors in order to optimize long-term renal transplant outcomes.

A comparison of long-term graft survival rates between the first and second donor kidney transplanted--the effect of a longer cold ischaemic time for the second kidney

Prolonged cold ischaemic time (CIT) is associated with delayed initial graft function and may also have a negative impact on long-term graft outcome. We carried out a study comparing the long-term graft survival rates between those recipients who received the first of a pair of donor kidneys versus the recipient of the second graft. Adult kidney transplant recipients who received one of a pair of donor kidneys at our institution between 1989-1995 were included. All recipients received a cyclosporin based immunosupression regimen. Graft survival rates were compared between the 2 groups at 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year intervals. A total of 520 renal transplant grafts were included in this study. Mean donor age was 35.4 years. Groups were similar for recipient age, gender, number of HLA mismatches, transplant number for that patient and percentage PRA. CIT was the only variable that was significantly different between the two groups; mean of 19.93 h in the first group compared to 25.65 h in the second group. Graft survival rates for the first kidney were significantly better than the second kidney-graft survival at 1 year 88.5% versus 84.7%, at 3 years 81.8% versus 76.7%, at 5 years 72.2% versus 64.9% and at 10 years 55.2% versus 40% (p = 0.012). Patient survival rates were similar in both groups. In our experience, the long-term graft survival rates are significantly better for the first kidney transplanted compared to the second kidney.

Creatinine reduction ratio on post-transplant day two as criterion in defining delayed graft function

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication after renal transplant, affecting its outcome. A common definition of DGF is the need for dialysis within the first week of transplantation, but this criterion has its drawbacks. We tried to validate an earlier and better defined parameter of DGF based on the creatinine reduction ratio on post-transplant day 2 (CRR2). We analyzed the clinical charts of 291 cadaver kidney recipients to compare the outcome of patients with immediate graft function (IGF), dialyzed patients (D-DGF) and nondialyzed CRR2-defined DGF patients (ND-DGF) and to identify risk factors for D-DGF and ND-DGF. Creatinine reduction ratio on post-transplant day 2 correlates significantly with renal function during the first year. Patients with IGF have significantly better renal function throughout the first year and better graft survival than patients with D-DGF and ND-DGF, while we found no differences either in renal function from days 30-365 or in graft survival between D-DGF and ND-DGF patients. Defining DGF by CRR2 allows an objective and quantitative diagnosis after transplantation and can help to improve post-transplant management. Creatinine reduction ratio on post-transplant day 2 correlates with renal function throughout the first year. The worse survival in the ND-DGF group is an important finding and a major advantage of the CRR2 criterion.

Early graft function after living donor kidney transplantation predicts rejection but not outcomes

Poor early graft function (EGF) after deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) has been intensely studied. Much less is known about poor EGF after living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Data were collected on 469 LDKTs performed between 1/1/97 and 12/31/01 to determine risk factors for and outcomes associated with poor EGF, defined as either delayed or slow graft function (DGF or SGF). The incidence of DGF and SGF were 4.7% and 10.7%, respectively. Diabetic etiology (OR 2.22; p = 0.021) and warm ischemia time (WIT) (OR 1.05 per min increment; p = 0.0025) emerged as independently associated with poor EGF. Neither functional graft survival nor 1-year graft function differed among the EGF groups. However, DGF and SGF strongly predisposed to acute rejection (AR), which compromised functional graft survival (p = 0.0007) and 1-year graft function. Therefore, we conclude that diabetic etiology of renal disease and WIT are the dominant risk factors for poor EGF after LDKT. Poor EGF did not directly compromise functional graft survival but strongly predisposed to AR. We suggest that immunosuppression should be intensified in the poor EGF setting to maximize LDKT longevity, as AR does impair functional graft survival.

Donor tissue characteristics influence cadaver kidney transplant function and graft survival but not rejection

Acute injury and age are characteristics of transplanted tissue that influence many aspects of the course of a renal allograft. The influence of donor tissue characteristics on outcomes can be analyzed by studying pairing, the extent to which two kidneys retrieved from the same cadaver donor manifest similar outcomes. Pairing studies help to define the relative role of donor-related factors (among pairs) versus non-donor factors (within pairs). This study analyzed graft survival for 220 pairs of cadaveric kidneys for the similarity of parameters reflecting function and rejection. It also examined whether the performance of one kidney was predicted by the course of its "mate," the other kidney from that donor. Parameters reflecting function showed sustained pairing posttransplantation, as did graft survival. In contrast, measures of rejection strongly affected survival but showed no pairing. Surprisingly, the survival of a kidney was predicted by the early performance of its mate, an observation we term the "mate effect." Six-month graft survival and renal function were reduced in grafts for which the mate kidney displayed any criteria for functional impairment (dialysis dependency, low urine output [</=1 L] in the first 24 h posttransplant or day-7 serum creatinine >/= 400 micro mol/L), even for kidneys which themselves lacked those criteria. Rejection measures did not demonstrate the mate effect. In conclusion, kidney transplant function is strongly linked to donor-related factors (age, brain death). In contrast, rejection affects survival and function, but it is not primarily determined by the characteristics of the donor tissue. Graft survival reflects both of these influences.