Treatment of active cytomegalovirus disease with oral ganciclovir in renal allograft recipients: monitoring efficacy with quantitative cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction

A double-blinded, prospective study to define antigenemia and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction cutoffs to start preemptive therapy in low-risk, seropositive, renal transplanted recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease occurs in 16% to 20% of low-risk, CMV-positive renal transplant recipients. The cutoffs for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) or phosphoprotein (pp65) antigenemia (pp65emia) for starting preemptive therapy have not been well established.

METHODS

We measured qPCR and pp65emia weekly from day 7 to day 120 after transplantation, in anti-CMV immunoglobulin G–positive donor and recipient pairs. Patients and physicians were blinded to the test results. Suspicion of CMV disease led to the order of new tests. In asymptomatic viremic patients, the highest pp65emia and qPCR values were used, whereas we considered the last value before diagnosis in those with CMV disease.

RESULTS

We collected a total of 1,481 blood samples from 102 adult patients. Seventeen patients developed CMV disease, 54 presented at least one episode of viremia that cleared spontaneously, and 31 never presented viremia. Five patients developed CMV disease after the end of the study period. The median (95% confidence interval) pp65emia and qPCR values were higher before CMV disease than during asymptomatic viremia (6 [9–82] vs. 3 [1–14] cells/10(6) cells; P<0.001 and 3,080 [1,263–15,605] vs. 258 [258–1,679] copies/mL; P=0.008, respectively). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that pp65emia 4 cells/10(6) cells or greater showed a sensitivity and specificity to predict CMV disease of 69% and 81%, respectively (area, 0.769; P=0.001), with a positive predictive value of 37% and a negative predictive value of 93%. For qPCR 2,000 copies/mL or higher, the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 57% and 91%, respectively (receiver operating characteristic area, 0.782; P=0.000).

CONCLUSION

With these cutoffs, both methods are appropriate for detecting CMV disease.

Significance of nested PCR and quantitative real time PCR for cytomegalovirus detection in renal transplant recipients

Immunocompromised renal transplant recipients are susceptible to severe cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection that makes its detection important in clinical practice. A total of 536 blood and 536 serum samples from 67 renal transplant recipients who had previously been diagnosed with terminal renal insufficiency were studied for CMV infection. In all samples, serology, shell vial culture, antigenaemia and nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in blood and serum were tested, and a real-time quantitative PCR was run on 90 specimens. Sixty-seven blood donors were used as controls. The results show that the quantitative real-time PCR assay could be of great interest for predicting CMV disease, and to monitor the onset of pre-emptive therapy.

Prospective study of relationship between cytomegalovirus pneumonia and viral load in renal transplant recipients

The present study prospectively examined the relationship between cytomegalovirus interstitial pneumonia (CMV-IP) and viral load among 56 renal transplant recipients. We sought to identify the cutoff of viral load to predict CMV-IP. Blood samples were obtained weekly within the first 2 months and every second week during 2 to 6 months after kidney transplantations. A commercial real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-method was applied to quantify CMV-DNA in plasma or in leukocytes. Among 54 renal transplant recipients who were analyzed for CMV-DNA in the blood (96.4%), 8 experienced CMV-IP (14.3%) and 2 died (3.6%). After kidney transplantation, CMV-DNA loads were near 0 in plasma before the week 4 and before the week 3 in leukocytes among both groups. From week 5 (week 4, in leukocytes), plasma CMV-DNA loads in the CMV-IP group increased, the peak value reached at week 8 in plasma and the week 9 in leukocytes. Whereas, the CMV-DNA loads both in plasma and in leukocytes in the non-CMV-IP group fluctuated at lower levels, those in plasma were significantly different between the 2 groups at the weeks 5, 7, and 9. For CMV-DNA in leukocytes, there were significant differences between 2 groups from week 6 to week 11. The present study demonstrated that dynamic determination of CMV-DNA may predict the occurrence of CMV-IP. Viral loads over 10(4) copies/mL plasma continuing for 3 weeks may serve as a cutoff to predict CMV-IP.