1
|
Donoghue K, Boniface S, Brobbin E, Byford S, Coleman R, Coulton S, Day E, Dhital R, Farid A, Hermann L, Jordan A, Kimergård A, Koutsou ML, Lingford-Hughes A, Marsden J, Neale J, O'Neill A, Phillips T, Shearer J, Sinclair J, Smith J, Strang J, Weinman J, Whittlesea C, Widyaratna K, Drummond C. Adjunctive Medication Management and Contingency Management to enhance adherence to acamprosate for alcohol dependence: the ADAM trial RCT. Health Technol Assess 2023; 27:1-88. [PMID: 37924307 PMCID: PMC10641712 DOI: 10.3310/dqkl6124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Acamprosate is an effective and cost-effective medication for alcohol relapse prevention but poor adherence can limit its full benefit. Effective interventions to support adherence to acamprosate are therefore needed. Objectives To determine the effectiveness of Medication Management, with and without Contingency Management, compared to Standard Support alone in enhancing adherence to acamprosate and the impact of adherence to acamprosate on abstinence and reduced alcohol consumption. Design Multicentre, three-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled clinical trial. Setting Specialist alcohol treatment services in five regions of England (South East London, Central and North West London, Wessex, Yorkshire and Humber and West Midlands). Participants Adults (aged 18 years or more), an International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, diagnosis of alcohol dependence, abstinent from alcohol at baseline assessment, in receipt of a prescription for acamprosate. Interventions (1) Standard Support, (2) Standard Support with adjunctive Medication Management provided by pharmacists via a clinical contact centre (12 sessions over 6 months), (3) Standard Support with adjunctive Medication Management plus Contingency Management that consisted of vouchers (up to £120) to reinforce participation in Medication Management. Consenting participants were randomised in a 2 : 1 : 1 ratio to one of the three groups using a stratified random permuted block method using a remote system. Participants and researchers were not blind to treatment allocation. Main outcome measures Primary outcome: self-reported percentage of medication taken in the previous 28 days at 6 months post randomisation. Economic outcome: EuroQol-5 Dimensions, a five-level version, used to calculate quality-adjusted life-years, with costs estimated using the Adult Service Use Schedule. Results Of the 1459 potential participants approached, 1019 (70%) were assessed and 739 (73 consented to participate in the study, 372 (50%) were allocated to Standard Support, 182 (25%) to Standard Support with Medication Management and 185 (25%) to Standard Support and Medication Management with Contingency Management. Data were available for 518 (70%) of participants at 6-month follow-up, 255 (68.5%) allocated to Standard Support, 122 (67.0%) to Standard Support and Medication Management and 141 (76.2%) to Standard Support and Medication Management with Contingency Management. The mean difference of per cent adherence to acamprosate was higher for those who received Standard Support and Medication Management with Contingency Management (10.6%, 95% confidence interval 19.6% to 1.6%) compared to Standard Support alone, at the primary end point (6-month follow-up). There was no significant difference in per cent days adherent when comparing Standard Support and Medication Management with Standard Support alone 3.1% (95% confidence interval 12.8% to -6.5%) or comparing Standard Support and Medication Management with Standard Support and Medication Management with Contingency Management 7.9% (95% confidence interval 18.7% to -2.8%). The primary economic analysis at 6 months found that Standard Support and Medication Management with Contingency Management was cost-effective compared to Standard Support alone, achieving small gains in quality-adjusted life-years at a lower cost per participant. Cost-effectiveness was not observed for adjunctive Medication Management compared to Standard Support alone. There were no serious adverse events related to the trial interventions reported. Limitations The trial's primary outcome measure changed substantially due to data collection difficulties and therefore relied on a measure of self-reported adherence. A lower than anticipated follow-up rate at 12 months may have lowered the statistical power to detect differences in the secondary analyses, although the primary analysis was not impacted. Conclusions Medication Management enhanced with Contingency Management is beneficial to patients for supporting them to take acamprosate. Future work Given our findings in relation to Contingency Management enhancing Medication Management adherence, future trials should be developed to explore its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness with other alcohol interventions where there is evidence of poor adherence. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN17083622 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17083622. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 22. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Donoghue
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
- National Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sadie Boniface
- National Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK
- Institute of Alcohol Studies, London, UK
| | - Eileen Brobbin
- National Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Byford
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's Health Economics, King's College London, London UK
| | - Rachel Coleman
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute for Clinical and Applied Health Research (ICAHR), University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Simon Coulton
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK
| | - Edward Day
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ranjita Dhital
- National Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK
- Arts and Sciences Department, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anum Farid
- National Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK
- What Works for Children's Social Care, London, UK
| | - Laura Hermann
- National Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute for Clinical and Applied Health Research (ICAHR), University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Amy Jordan
- National Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK
- Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Andreas Kimergård
- National Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Anne Lingford-Hughes
- Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - John Marsden
- National Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joanne Neale
- National Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK
| | - Aimee O'Neill
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Thomas Phillips
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute for Clinical and Applied Health Research (ICAHR), University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - James Shearer
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's Health Economics, King's College London, London UK
| | - Julia Sinclair
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Joanna Smith
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - John Strang
- National Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - John Weinman
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Cate Whittlesea
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kideshini Widyaratna
- Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Colin Drummond
- National Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hallgren KA, Duncan MH, Iles-Shih MD, Cohn EB, McCabe CJ, Chang YM, Saxon AJ. Feasibility, Engagement, and Usability of a Remote, Smartphone-Based Contingency Management Program as a Treatment Add-On for Patients Who Use Methamphetamine: Single-Arm Pilot Study. JMIR Form Res 2023; 7:e47516. [PMID: 37410529 PMCID: PMC10360016 DOI: 10.2196/47516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United States, methamphetamine-related overdoses have tripled from 2015 to 2020 and continue to rise. However, efficacious treatments such as contingency management (CM) are often unavailable in health systems. OBJECTIVE We conducted a single-arm pilot study to evaluate the feasibility, engagement, and usability of a fully remotely delivered mobile health CM program offered to adult outpatients who used methamphetamine and were receiving health care within a large university health system. METHODS Participants were referred by primary care or behavioral health clinicians between September 2021 and July 2022. Eligibility criteria screening was conducted by telephone and included self-reported methamphetamine use on ≥5 out of the past 30 days and a goal of reducing or abstaining from methamphetamine use. Eligible participants who agreed to take part then completed an initial welcome phase that included 2 videoconference calls to register for and learn about the CM program and 2 "practice" saliva-based substance tests prompted by a smartphone app. Participants who completed these welcome phase activities could then receive the remotely delivered CM intervention for 12 consecutive weeks. The intervention included approximately 24 randomly scheduled smartphone alerts requesting a video recording of themselves taking a saliva-based substance test to verify recent methamphetamine abstinence, 12 weekly calls with a CM guide, 35 self-paced cognitive behavioral therapy modules, and multiple surveys. Financial incentives were disbursed via reloadable debit cards. An intervention usability questionnaire was completed at the midpoint. RESULTS Overall, 37 patients completed telephone screenings, with 28 (76%) meeting the eligibility criteria and consenting to participate. Most participants who completed a baseline questionnaire (21/24, 88%) self-reported symptoms consistent with severe methamphetamine use disorder, and most had other co-occurring non-methamphetamine substance use disorders (22/28, 79%) and co-occurring mental health disorders (25/28, 89%) according to existing electronic health records. Overall, 54% (15/28) of participants successfully completed the welcome phase and were able to receive the CM intervention. Among these participants, engagement with substance testing, calls with CM guides, and cognitive behavioral therapy modules varied. Rates of verified methamphetamine abstinence in substance testing were generally low but varied considerably across participants. Participants reported positive opinions about the intervention's ease of use and satisfaction with the intervention. CONCLUSIONS Fully remote CM can be feasibly delivered within health care settings lacking existing CM programs. Although remote delivery may help reduce barriers to treatment access, many patients who use methamphetamine may struggle to engage with initial onboarding. High rates of co-occurring psychiatric conditions in the patient population may also contribute to uptake and engagement challenges. Future efforts could leverage greater human-to-human connection, more streamlined onboarding procedures, larger incentives, longer durations, and the incentivization of non-abstinence-based recovery goals to increase uptake and engagement with fully remote mobile health-based CM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin A Hallgren
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Mark H Duncan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Matthew D Iles-Shih
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Eliza B Cohn
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Connor J McCabe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Yanni M Chang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Andrew J Saxon
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, Veterans Health Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Raiff BR, Burrows C, Dwyer M. Behavior-Analytic Approaches to the Management of Diabetes Mellitus: Current Status and Future Directions. Behav Anal Pract 2020; 14:240-252. [PMID: 33732594 DOI: 10.1007/s40617-020-00488-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is the seventh leading cause of death in the United States, requiring a series of complex behavior changes that must be sustained for a lifetime (e.g., counting carbohydrates, self-monitoring blood glucose, adjusting insulin). Although complex, all of these tasks involve behavior, making them amenable targets for behavior analysts. In this article, the authors describe interventions that have focused on antecedent, consequent, multicomponent, and alternate procedures for the management of diabetes, highlighting ways in which technology has been used to overcome common barriers to the use of these intensive, evidence-based interventions. Additional variables relevant to poorly managed diabetes (e.g., delay discounting) are also discussed. Future research and practice should focus on harnessing continued advances in information technology while also considering underexplored behavioral technologies for the effective treatment of diabetes, with a focus on identifying sustainable, long-term solutions for maintaining proper diabetes management. Practical implementation of these interventions will depend on having qualified behavior analysts working in integrated primary care settings where the interventions are most likely to be used, which will require interdisciplinary training and collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany R Raiff
- Department of Psychology, Rowan University, 201 Mullica Hill Road, Glassboro, NJ 08028 USA
| | - Connor Burrows
- Department of Psychology, Rowan University, 201 Mullica Hill Road, Glassboro, NJ 08028 USA
| | - Matthew Dwyer
- Department of Psychology, Rowan University, 201 Mullica Hill Road, Glassboro, NJ 08028 USA
| |
Collapse
|