1
|
Simmich J, Andrews NE, Claus A, Murdoch M, Russell TG. Assessing a GPS-Based 6-Minute Walk Test for People With Persistent Pain: Validation Study. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e46820. [PMID: 38498031 PMCID: PMC10985605 DOI: 10.2196/46820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is a commonly used method to assess the exercise capacity of people with many health conditions, including persistent pain. However, it is conventionally performed with in-person supervision in a hospital or clinic, therefore requiring staff resources. It may also be difficult when in-person supervision is unavailable, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic, or when the person is geographically remote. A potential solution to these issues could be to use GPS to measure walking distance. OBJECTIVE The primary aim of this study was to assess the validity of a GPS-based smartphone app to measure walking distance as an alternative to the conventional 6MWT in a population with persistent pain. The secondary aim of this study was to estimate the difference between the pain evoked by the 2 test methods. METHODS People with persistent pain (N=36) were recruited to complete a conventional 6MWT on a 30-m shuttle track and a 6MWT assessed by a smartphone app using GPS, performed on outdoor walking circuits. Tests were performed in random order, separated by a 15-minute rest. The 95% limits of agreement were calculated using the Bland-Altman method, with a specified maximum allowable difference of 100 m. Pain was assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale before and after each walk test. RESULTS The mean 6-minute walk distance measured by the GPS-based smartphone app was 13.2 (SD 46; 95% CI -2.7 to 29.1) m higher than that assessed in the conventional manner. The 95% limits of agreement were 103.9 (95% CI 87.4-134.1) m and -77.6 (95% CI -107.7 to -61) m, which exceeded the maximum allowable difference. Pain increased in the conventional walk test by 1.1 (SD 1.0) points, whereas pain increased in the app test by 0.8 (SD 1.4) points. CONCLUSIONS In individuals with persistent pain, the 2 methods of assessing the 6MWT may not be interchangeable due to limited validity. Potential reasons for the differences between the 2 methods might be attributed to the variation in track layout (shuttle track vs continuous circuit); poor GPS accuracy; deviations from the 30-m shuttle track; human variability in walking speed; and the potential impact of a first test on the second test due to fatigue, pain provocation, or a learning effect. Future research is needed to improve the accuracy of the GPS-based approach. Despite its limitations, the GPS-based 6MWT may still have value as a tool for remote monitoring that could allow individuals with persistent pain to self-administer frequent assessments of their functional capacity in their home environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Simmich
- RECOVER Injury Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- STARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Nicole Emma Andrews
- RECOVER Injury Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- STARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia
- The Tess Cramond Pain and Research Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
- Occupational Therapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Andrew Claus
- The Tess Cramond Pain and Research Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Megan Murdoch
- The Tess Cramond Pain and Research Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
- Physiotherapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Trevor Glen Russell
- RECOVER Injury Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- STARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Crouch TB, Wedin S, Kilpatrick R, Smith A, Flores B, Rodes J, Borckardt J, Barth K. Disparities in access but not outcomes: Medicaid versus non-Medicaid patients in multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2024:1-8. [PMID: 38411127 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2321326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
Purpose: There are known disparities in chronic pain severity, treatment, and opioid-related risks amongst individuals from lower socioeconomic status, including Medicaid beneficiaries, but little is known about whether Medicaid beneficiaries benefit in a similar way from multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation. This study investigated differences in clinical outcomes between Medicaid and non-Medicaid beneficiaries who completed a 3-week multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program.Methods: Participants (N = 131) completed a broad range of clinical measures pre- and post-treatment including pain severity, pain interference, depression, anxiety, objective physical functioning, and opioid misuse risk. Patients with Medicaid were compared with non-Medicaid patients in terms of baseline characteristics and rate of change, utilizing two-factor repeated measures analyses of variance.Results: There were baseline characteristic differences, with Medicaid beneficiaries being more likely to be African American, have higher rates of pain, worse physical functioning, and lower rates of opioid use. Despite baseline differences, both groups demonstrated significantly improved outcomes across all measures (p<.001) and no significant difference in rate of improvement.Conclusions: Results suggest that pain rehabilitation is as effective for Medicaid recipients as non-Medicaid recipients. Patients with Medicaid are particularly vulnerable to disparities in treatment, so efforts to expand access to multidisciplinary pain treatments are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor B Crouch
- Department of Psychiatry, VA Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Sharlene Wedin
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of SC, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Rebecca Kilpatrick
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of SC, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Allison Smith
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of SC, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | | | - Julia Rodes
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of SC, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jeffrey Borckardt
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of SC, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Kelly Barth
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of SC, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Crouch TB, Donovan E, Smith WR, Barth K, Becker WC, Svikis D. Patient Motivation to Reduce or Discontinue Opioids for Chronic Pain: Self-efficacy, Barriers, and Readiness to Change. Clin J Pain 2024; 40:18-25. [PMID: 37855333 PMCID: PMC10841444 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess levels and predictors of self-efficacy and motivation to change opioid use among a community sample of patients using opioids for chronic pain, as well as patient-reported barriers to pursuing opioid discontinuation. METHODS Participants with a variety of chronic pain conditions, recruited from ResearchMatch.org , completed a battery of electronic, self-report questionnaires assessing demographic and medical characteristics, pain treatment history, and levels of readiness, self-efficacy, and other attitudes toward reducing or discontinuing opioid use. Multiple regression analyses and analyses of variance were conducted to examine predictors of readiness and self-efficacy to change opioid use. A modified version of rapid qualitative analysis was utilized to analyze themes in participant responses to an open-ended item about "what it would take" to consider opioid discontinuation. RESULTS The final sample included N=119 participants, the majority of whom were female (78.2%), Caucasian (77.3%), and well-educated. Readiness and self-efficacy to decrease or stop opioid use were fairly low on a 0 to 10 Visual Analog Scale (2.6 to 3.8) and significantly higher to decrease than stop ( P <0.01). Higher readiness to change was predicted by lower pain severity and higher concern about opioids, whereas higher self-efficacy was predicted by shorter pain duration. Results from the qualitative analyses revealed that the availability of an alternative treatment option was the most commonly cited requirement to consider opioid discontinuation. DISCUSSION Patients with lower pain severity, shorter duration of pain, and higher concerns about opioids may be a prime target from a motivation standpoint for interventions addressing opioid tapering and discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emily Donovan
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Wally R Smith
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine
| | - Kelly Barth
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - William C Becker
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, New Haven, CT
| | - Dace Svikis
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Institute for Women's Health
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moore A, Tumin D. Overlap of pain-related and general measures of disability among adults with chronic pain. Pain Pract 2024; 24:62-71. [PMID: 37534395 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chronic pain is known to be correlated with disability. We aimed to determine the overlap between a general self-reported measure of disability and a measure of disability due to pain problems among adults with chronic pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and analyzed respondents with chronic pain in the past 3 months. General disability was defined as being limited in the kind or amount of work one can do due to any physical, mental, or emotional problem. Pain-related disability was defined as pain limiting one's activity on "most days" or "every day." RESULTS Based on a sample of 6874 respondents with chronic pain, 58% had either kind of disability, including 9% who reported only pain-related, but not general disability; and 27% who reported both types of disability. Respondents reporting only pain-related, but not general disability tended to be younger and had lower rates of obesity, smoking, diabetes, and hypertension than respondents reporting both pain-related and general disability. DISCUSSION Among people with chronic pain, most people with disability are experiencing limitations related to pain problems. Assessment of disability without addressing pain interference has likely underestimated the disability burden in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Moore
- Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| | - Dmitry Tumin
- Department of Pediatrics, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Edwards KA, Reed DE, Anderson D, Harding K, Turner AP, Soares B, Suri P, Williams RM. Opening the black box of psychological treatments for chronic pain: A clinical perspective for medical providers. PM R 2023; 15:999-1011. [PMID: 36633497 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Karlyn A Edwards
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David E Reed
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Derek Anderson
- Rehabilitation Care Services, Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kaitlin Harding
- Rehabilitation Care Services, Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Aaron P Turner
- Rehabilitation Care Services, Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Bosco Soares
- Rehabilitation Care Services, Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Pradeep Suri
- Rehabilitation Care Services, Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Clinical Learning, Evidence, and Research (CLEAR) Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Rhonda M Williams
- Rehabilitation Care Services, Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Braverman MT, Volmar KM, Govier DJ. "The Pain Doesn't Have to Control You." A Qualitative Evaluation of Three Pain Clinics Teaching Nonopioid Pain Management Strategies. Am J Health Promot 2023; 37:210-221. [PMID: 36053192 DOI: 10.1177/08901171221119799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore factors related to effectiveness of nonpharmacological treatment for opioid-dependent patients suffering with chronic pain. APPROACH A qualitative study incorporating individual interviews and focus group interviews. SETTING 3 rural Oregon nonopioid pain management clinics. INTERVENTION A 10-week nonpharmacological educational program incorporating cognitive-behavioral therapy, movement therapy, mindfulness, and other skills. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS Across sites, we conducted 9 individual interviews with clinic staff and 3 focus group interviews with 34 patients who had participated in the course. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes within and across respondent groups. RESULTS Analysis revealed 4 primary themes: program goals; program benefits; characteristics of patients who benefit from the program; coordination of clinic experiences with other care. Several primary findings can be highlighted. The clinics focused on improving patients' quality of life, while opioid use reduction was a potential secondary benefit, driven by patients. Major program benefits included enhanced pain self-management skills, patients' greater assertiveness in communications with healthcare providers, and, in numerous cases, opioid use reduction. Participants were unanimous that predisposition toward active self-management of one's pain was an essential factor for positive outcomes. Patients reported considerable variability in providers' understanding of their clinic participation. CONCLUSION Nonpharmacological approaches for treating chronic pain can be effective for many patients. Clinics teaching these approaches should be more fully integrated into the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc T Braverman
- School of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, 2694Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - Karen M Volmar
- Department of Health Policy and Management, 41474University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Diana J Govier
- VA HSR&D Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vranceanu AM, Bakhshaie J, Reichman M, Ring D. A Call for Interdisciplinary Collaboration to Promote Musculoskeletal Health: The Creation of the International Musculoskeletal Mental and Social Health Consortium (I-MESH). J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2022; 29:709-715. [PMID: 34605997 DOI: 10.1007/s10880-021-09827-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Despite increasing recognition of psychosocial factors in musculoskeletal conditions, its impact on reducing the global toll of musculoskeletal symptoms has been only incremental. It is time to bring together clinicians and researchers with heterogeneous backgrounds, unified by a commitment to reduce the global impact of musculoskeletal illness by addressing mental and social health factors. In 2020, we initiated the International Musculoskeletal Mental and Social Health Consortium. Our current key priority areas are: (1) Develop best practices for uniform terminology, (2) Understand barriers to mental and social health care for musculoskeletal conditions, (3) Develop clinical and research resources. The purpose of this paper is to render a call to interdisciplinary collaboration on the psychological aspects of musculoskeletal health. We believe this international interdisciplinary collaboration is pivotal to the advancement of the biopsychosocial model of musculoskeletal care and has the potential to improve the health of individuals with musculoskeletal conditions globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana-Maria Vranceanu
- Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 1 Bowdoin Square, 1st Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - Jafar Bakhshaie
- Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 1 Bowdoin Square, 1st Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Mira Reichman
- Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 1 Bowdoin Square, 1st Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - David Ring
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pester BD, Crouch TB, Christon L, Rodes J, Wedin S, Kilpatrick R, Pester MS, Borckardt J, Barth K. Gender differences in multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation: The mediating role of pain acceptance. JOURNAL OF CONTEXTUAL BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2022.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|