Evaluation of an Ecologically Valid Group Intervention to Address Sleep Health in Families of Children With Allergic Diseases

A randomised controlled dismantling trial of sleep restriction therapies for chronic insomnia disorder in middle childhood: effects on sleep and anxiety, and possible contraindications

Sleep restriction therapies likely drive improvement in insomnia in middle childhood via increases in homeostatic sleep pressure (e.g., evening sleepiness). Increased evening sleepiness may also dampen comorbid anxiety symptoms; and reduced wakefulness in bed may reduce worry. However, sleep restriction therapies have never been evaluated as a standalone intervention in this population. The mechanism of action needs testing, as do effects on anxiety, and cognitive performance and parasomnias (possible contraindications). This randomised controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of two "doses" of sleep restriction therapy (sleep restriction therapy, bedtime restriction therapy), compared to a control condition (time in bed regularisation). A total of 61 children (mean [SD, range] age 9.1 [2.1, 6-14] years; 54% female) with chronic insomnia disorder received two weekly 60-min treatment sessions with a psychologist. Sleep, sleepiness, anxiety, worry, cognitive performance, and parasomnias were measured pre-treatment, across treatment, and at 4-weeks post-treatment. Both the sleep and bedtime restriction groups experienced reductions in total sleep time (d = 1.38-2.27) and increases in evening sleepiness (d = 1.01-1.47) during the 2-week treatment, and improvements in insomnia (i.e., sleep onset latency; d = 1.10-1.21), relative to the control group. All groups reported improved anxiety and worry, yet there were no differences between the control and restriction groups (all p > 0.658). Time in bed increased at the 1-month follow-up, and benefits to sleep and insomnia were maintained. There were no adverse effects on cognitive functioning (all p > 0.259), nor parasomnia occurrence (all p > 0.740). These results suggest that sleep restriction therapies are brief, yet effective, standalone interventions for insomnia in middle childhood, and improvements are likely due to increased sleepiness, not sleep regularisation.

Interventions for caregivers of children with food allergy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Studies have identified that food allergy (FA) in children is related to poorer caregiver quality of life (QoL). However, it is unclear which interventions are most effective at improving outcomes for caregivers of children with FA. This review aimed to identify and determine the efficacy, acceptability and quality of interventions for caregivers of children with FA.

METHODS

A systematic search of four databases was conducted to identify studies evaluating any intervention that targeted well-being and support of caregivers of children with FA. Studies were not excluded based on design and were rated for quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) and the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

RESULTS

Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria: eight studies used a pre-test/post-test design, four studies used a post-test design, two studies used an RCT design, and one study used a case-control design. Seven studies were educational interventions, five were psychological interventions, and three involved peer/professional support. All interventions had high participant acceptability; some evidence for cognitive behavioural interventions in supporting mothers was observed. Educational interventions tended to be associated with improvements in FA knowledge. With the exception of three studies, most studies were assessed as poor or moderate in terms of quality.

CONCLUSION

There is a paucity of high-quality research evaluating interventions to improve outcomes in parents of children with FA. Limited evidence suggests that cognitive behavioural interventions could benefit some mothers, but this has not been tested in other populations. Future research should use methodologically sound designs with validated outcome measures.

A randomized pilot trial of a school-based psychoeducational intervention for children with asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a common childhood illness with high morbidity and mortality among minority and socio-economically disadvantaged children. Disparities are not fully accounted for by differences in asthma prevalence, highlighting a need for interventions targeting factors associated with poorer asthma control. One such factor is psychological stress.

OBJECTIVE

Here, we examine the feasibility and acceptability of "I Can Cope (ICC)," a school-based stress management and coping intervention for children with asthma.

METHODS

A parallel randomized pilot trial was conducted. One hundred and four low-income children (mean age 10 years; 54% male; 70% African American) with persistent asthma were recruited from 12 urban schools and randomized to the following: (a) ICC or one of two control conditions: (b) "Open Airways for Schools (OAS)"-an asthma education intervention or (c) no treatment.

RESULTS

Seventy one percentage of eligible children participated in the study, with a dropout rate of 12%. ICC was rated as highly acceptable by participating children and parents. Preliminary efficacy data suggest that when compared with no treatment, ICC resulted in decreased symptoms of depression, perceived stress and child-reported symptoms of asthma, and improvements in sleep quality and child-reported asthma control. There were no intervention-related changes in objective measures of asthma morbidity. The magnitude of intervention effects on psychological function did not differ between the ICC and OAS groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Results support the feasibility and acceptability of utilizing school-based interventions to access hard to reach children with asthma. Preliminary findings offer support for future, large-scale efficacy studies of school-based interventions designed to target multiple factors that contribute to asthma disparities.

Interactive effects of family functioning and sleep experiences on daily lung functioning in pediatric asthma: An ecological momentary assessment approach

Objectives: Children living in urban, underserved settings are at risk for experiencing sleep difficulties as well as poor asthma outcomes. The family is important for both asthma management and ensuring children are getting the necessary amount of sleep, but how family functioning and sleep patterns influence children's asthma remains unclear. Methods: Fifty-nine children (7-12 years old; 90% African American) diagnosed with asthma, and their primary caregivers, participated in this study. In a single research session, caregivers rated overall family functioning via the Family Assessment Device. Caregivers also completed daily diaries delivered via smartphone for a two-week period rating their children's daily sleep quantity and quality; a home-based spirometer (AM2) was used to assess children's pulmonary functioning across that same period. Two-level multilevel models tested associations among overall family functioning, children's sleep quality/quantity, and pulmonary functioning. Results: Child sleep quality, quantity, and general family functioning did not predict child pulmonary functioning directly. Family functioning and sleep quality interacted to predict children's pulmonary functioning; children with poor family functioning and bad/very bad sleep quality had the poorest levels of lung functioning. Conclusions: These findings highlight a subset of children who are at higher risk for poor lung functioning based on sleep quality and family functioning. Results may inform routine monitoring of family functioning and sleep difficulties at pediatric asthma visits and intervention strategies to augment children's lung functioning.