1
|
Lewitus VJ, Blackwell KT. Estradiol Receptors Inhibit Long-Term Potentiation in the Dorsomedial Striatum. eNeuro 2023; 10:ENEURO.0071-23.2023. [PMID: 37487741 PMCID: PMC10405883 DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0071-23.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Estradiol, a female sex hormone and the predominant form of estrogen, has diverse effects throughout the brain including in learning and memory. Estradiol modulates several types of learning that depend on the dorsomedial striatum (DMS), a subregion of the basal ganglia involved in goal-directed learning, cued action-selection, and motor skills. A cellular basis of learning is synaptic plasticity, and the presence of extranuclear estradiol receptors ERα, ERβ, and G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) throughout the DMS suggests that estradiol may influence rapid cellular actions including those involved in plasticity. To test whether estradiol affects synaptic plasticity in the DMS, corticostriatal long-term potentiation (LTP) was induced using theta-burst stimulation (TBS) in ex vivo brain slices from intact male and female C57BL/6 mice. Extracellular field recordings showed that female mice in the diestrous stage of the estrous cycle exhibited LTP similar to male mice, while female mice in estrus did not exhibit LTP. Furthermore, antagonists of ERα or GPER rescued LTP in estrous females and agonists of ERα or GPER reduced LTP in diestrous females. In males, activating ERα but not GPER reduced LTP. These results uncover an inhibitory action of estradiol receptors on cellular learning in the DMS and suggest a cellular mechanism underlying the impairment in certain types of DMS-based learning observed in the presence of high estradiol. Because of the dorsal striatum's role in substance use disorders, these findings may provide a mechanism underlying an estradiol-mediated progression from goal-directed to habitual drug use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kim T Blackwell
- Interdisciplinary Neuroscience PhD Program
- Department of Bioengineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Klusmann H, Schulze L, Engel S, Bücklein E, Daehn D, Lozza-Fiacco S, Geiling A, Meyer C, Andersen E, Knaevelsrud C, Schumacher S. HPA axis activity across the menstrual cycle - a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Front Neuroendocrinol 2022; 66:100998. [PMID: 35597328 DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2022.100998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Differential HPA axis function has been proposed to underlie sex-differences in mental disorders; however, the impact of fluctuating sex hormones across the menstrual cycle on HPA axis activity is still unclear. This meta-analysis investigated basal cortisol concentrations as a marker for HPA axis activity across the menstrual cycle. Through a systematic literature search of five databases, 121 longitudinal studies were included, summarizing data of 2641 healthy, cycling participants between the ages of 18 and 45. The meta-analysis showed higher cortisol concentrations in the follicular vs. luteal phase (dSMC = 0.12, p =.004, [0.04 - 0.20]). Comparisons between more precise cycle phases were mostly insignificant, aside from higher concentrations in the menstrual vs. premenstrual phase (dSMC = 0.17, [0.02 - 0.33], p =.03). In all included studies, nine samples used established cortisol parameters to indicate HPA axis function, specifically diurnal profiles (k = 4) and the cortisol awakening response (CAR) (k = 5). Therefore, the meta-analysis highlights the need for more rigorous investigation of HPA axis activity and menstrual cycle phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Klusmann
- Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Schwendenerstraße 27, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Lars Schulze
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Sinha Engel
- Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Schwendenerstraße 27, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Elise Bücklein
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Universität Ulm, Lise-Meitner-Str. 16, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
| | - Daria Daehn
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Serena Lozza-Fiacco
- School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carolina Crossings Building B, 2218 Nelson Highway, 27517 Chapel Hill, USA.
| | - Angelika Geiling
- Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Schwendenerstraße 27, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Caroline Meyer
- Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Schwendenerstraße 27, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Elizabeth Andersen
- School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carolina Crossings Building B, 2218 Nelson Highway, 27517 Chapel Hill, USA.
| | - Christine Knaevelsrud
- Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Schwendenerstraße 27, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Sarah Schumacher
- Division of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Schwendenerstraße 27, 14195 Berlin, Germany; Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health, HMU Health and Medical University, Olympischer Weg 1, 14471 Potsdam, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
LEARNING OBJECTIVE After participating in this activity, learners should be better able to:• Discuss and outline the general and overlapping effects of the menstrual cycle on women's mental health. ABSTRACT A growing body of research demonstrates menstrual cycle-dependent fluctuations in psychiatric symptoms; these fluctuations can therefore be considered as prevalent phenomena. Possible mechanisms underlying these fluctuations posit behavioral, psychological, and neuroendocrine influences. Recent reviews document cyclic exacerbation of symptoms and explore these mechanisms in the context of specific and often single disorders. The question remains, however, as to whether there are general and overlapping effects of the menstrual cycle on women's mental health. To address this gap, we synthesized the literature examining the exacerbation of a variety of psychiatric symptoms across the menstrual cycle in adult women. Results show that the premenstrual and menstrual phases are most consistently implicated in transdiagnostic symptom exacerbation. Specifically, strong evidence indicates increases in psychosis, mania, depression, suicide/suicide attempts, and alcohol use during these phases. Anxiety, stress, and binge eating appear to be elevated more generally throughout the luteal phase. The subjective effects of smoking and cocaine use are reduced during the luteal phase, but fewer data are available for other substances. Less consistent patterns are demonstrated for panic disorder, symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, and borderline personality disorder, and it is difficult to draw conclusions for symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and trichotillomania because of the limited data. Future research should focus on developing standardized approaches to identifying menstrual cycle phases and adapting pharmacological and behavioral interventions for managing fluctuations in psychiatric symptoms across the menstrual cycle.
Collapse
|
4
|
Houghton LC, Howland RE, Wei Y, Ma X, Kehm RD, Chung WK, Genkinger JM, Santella RM, Hartmann MF, Wudy SA, Terry MB. The Steroid Metabolome and Breast Cancer Risk in Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer: The Novel Role of Adrenal Androgens and Glucocorticoids. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020; 30:89-96. [PMID: 32998947 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND No study has comprehensively examined how the steroid metabolome is associated with breast cancer risk in women with familial risk. METHODS We examined 36 steroid metabolites across the spectrum of familial risk (5-year risk ranged from 0.14% to 23.8%) in pre- and postmenopausal women participating in the New York site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR). We conducted a nested case-control study with 62 cases/124 controls individually matched on menopausal status, age, and race. We measured metabolites using GC-MS in urine samples collected at baseline before the onset of prospectively ascertained cases. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) per doubling in hormone levels. RESULTS The average proportion of total steroid metabolites in the study sample were glucocorticoids (61%), androgens (26%), progestogens (11%), and estrogens (2%). A doubling in glucocorticoids (aOR = 2.7; 95% CI = 1.3-5.3) and androgens (aOR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.0-2.7) was associated with increased breast cancer risk. Specific glucocorticoids (THE, THF αTHF, 6β-OH-F, THA, and α-THB) were associated with 49% to 161% increased risk. Two androgen metabolites (AN and 11-OH-AN) were associated with 70% (aOR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.1-2.7) and 90% (aOR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.2-3.1) increased risk, respectively. One intermediate metabolite of a cortisol precursor (THS) was associated with 65% (OR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.0-2.7) increased risk. E1 and E2 estrogens were associated with 20% and 27% decreased risk, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that glucocorticoids and 11-oxygenated androgens are positively associated with breast cancer risk across the familial risk spectrum. IMPACT If replicated, our findings suggest great potential of including steroids into existing breast cancer risk assessment tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren C Houghton
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York. .,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Renata E Howland
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
| | - Ying Wei
- Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
| | - Xinran Ma
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
| | - Rebecca D Kehm
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.,Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Jeanine M Genkinger
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York.,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Regina M Santella
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.,Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
| | - Michaela F Hartmann
- Steroid Research and Mass Spectrometry Unit, Laboratory for Translational Hormone Analytics in Pediatric Endocrinology, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
| | - Stefan A Wudy
- Steroid Research and Mass Spectrometry Unit, Laboratory for Translational Hormone Analytics in Pediatric Endocrinology, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York.,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nakajima M, Allen S, al'Absi M. Influences of the Menstrual Phase on Cortisol Response to Stress in Nicotine Dependent Women: A Preliminary Examination. Nicotine Tob Res 2020; 21:617-622. [PMID: 29648657 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nty071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2017] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Evidence indicates that menstrual cycle phase plays a role in smoking withdrawal symptoms and craving. Stress increases these symptoms. Whether the stress regulatory mechanism is associated with menstrual phase and withdrawal symptoms is not well understood. METHODS Thirty-seven female smokers and 16 female nonsmokers were asked to complete a laboratory session. In each group, approximately half of the participants were tested when they were in the follicular phase and the other half was tested in the luteal phase. The session included resting baseline, stress, and recovery periods. Saliva samples for the measurement of cortisol and subjective measures of craving and withdrawal symptoms were collected at the end of each period. RESULTS A series of repeated measures analysis of covariance found a significant smoking group × menstrual phase × sampling time interaction in cortisol levels (p < .05). Follow-up analyses indicated a reduced cortisol stress response in the luteal group relative to the follicular group in smokers (p < .02). This difference was not found in nonsmokers. CONCLUSIONS Menstrual cycle phase is related to hormonal stress response and smoking withdrawal symptomatology. IMPLICATIONS We show influences of the menstrual cycle phase on stress response among smokers. This is demonstrated by a reduced cortisol response to stress in the luteal group relative to the follicular group among smokers. This menstrual phase difference was not found in nonsmokers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Motohiro Nakajima
- Department of Family Medicine and Biobehavioral Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth, MN
| | - Sharon Allen
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Mustafa al'Absi
- Department of Family Medicine and Biobehavioral Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth, MN
| |
Collapse
|