Trajectories of change in well-being during cognitive behavioral therapies for anxiety disorders: Quantifying the impact and covariation with improvements in anxiety

The Impact of Mental Imagery Instructions on Patients' and Therapists' Positive Affect and Strength-Based Behaviours Within Psychotherapy Sessions: A Randomized Controlled Process Study

OBJECTIVE

Increased attention has recently been paid to the well-being and flourishing of patients in psychotherapy. This study investigated the occurrence of positive affect (PA) and strength-based behaviours within psychotherapy sessions contrasting positive versus neutral imagery instructions.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Seventy-eight sessions of cognitive behavioural therapy involving 26 patients (69.23% female; Mage = 40.31) treated by 13 therapists were selected. PA and strength-based behaviours of patients and therapists were coded on a minute-by-minute basis with the Resource-Oriented Microprocess Analysis. Each session started with a brief mental imagery instruction. Data were analysed using multilevel modelling.

RESULTS

Mild levels of PA were very common, whereas stronger expressions were occasional, especially at the beginning and end of sessions. Strength-based behaviours were employed in one-fifth of the videos analysed. Therapists in the positive imagery instruction showed more strength-based behaviours in the beginning phase of sessions, p < 0.05. The two imagery instructions significantly differed in the session trajectories of PA, p < 0.05. A quadratic trend with higher initial values and a sharper decline in PA were found in the positive instruction, whereas the neutral instruction showed a flatter trend.

CONCLUSION

Patients and therapists experience PA and discuss strengths in psychotherapy sessions despite patients' distress. The positive imagery instructions potentially induced a positive focus at baseline for therapists but had a negligible effect on the subsequent session progression.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03767101 (registered December 6, 2018).

Symptom distress and psychosocial functioning improve bidirectionally during cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders

The efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for reducing anxiety disorder symptoms is well documented. However, limited research has investigated how symptom amelioration is temporally associated with changes in psychosocial functioning, such as interpersonal and social role functioning, during CBT. Participants were 288 (M age = 37.00 [SD = 14.41]; 59.0% female; 69.0% White; 6.6% Hispanic/Latino) outpatients diagnosed with an anxiety disorder who received CBT at a specialized hospital-based clinic. Participants completed the Outcome Questionnaire-45, a measure of symptom distress, social role performance, and interpersonal problems, at initial assessment and prior to each treatment session. Symptom distress and indicators of psychosocial functioning were robustly related during 25 sessions of CBT. Cross-lagged analyses revealed that reductions in symptom distress predicted subsequent improvements in psychosocial functioning during treatment, and vice versa. Associations from symptom distress to subsequent psychosocial functioning evidenced larger effect sizes than the reverse. Lower levels of severity at intake and presence of comorbid depression attenuated the association between symptom reduction and subsequent social role performance improvement. In sum, anxiety symptoms and psychosocial functioning bidirectionally improve during CBT for anxiety disorders. Maximally effective treatments may be those that simultaneously ameliorate symptoms and focus on improving functioning in key domains.

Are changes in joviality associated with cognitive behavioral treatment outcomes? Examining an emerging treatment target

The present study expands on the growing body of research on the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on positive affect. More specifically, we explore how CBT may promote increases in the Joviality subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form (PANAS-X), a measure of self-rated affect that captures positive emotions, including joy and excitement, and how change in joviality may be associated with concurrent symptom change. We utilized data from a randomized equivalence trial comparing the efficacy of the unified protocol (UP) for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders, a transdiagnostic CBT, against various well-established single disorder protocols (SDP) and waitlist control. First, we generated affect profiles for patients receiving CBT (either UP or SDP) or waitlist control, based on their baseline and posttreatment positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA), compared with a clinical reference sample. We found that the affect profile for most patients receiving CBT shifted from high NA/low PA to low NA/high PA. Further, participants receiving CBT were more likely than individuals in the waitlist control to achieve this outcome. We then examined the PANAS-X Joviality subscale, which has been subject to very limited previous research. Change in joviality was associated with improvement in symptoms of both anxiety (B = -0.81, p = .00) and depression (B = -0.94, p = .00). Joviality increased more rapidly in individuals with more severe anxiety but not severe depression. We discuss the possible clinical implications of these preliminary results, including the role of treatment innovations incorporating a focus on increasing positive affect, particularly the emotions associated with joviality, while simultaneously decreasing negative affect. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Patient-reported outcome measures for life engagement in mental health: a systematic review

Background

Life engagement in the context of mental health is a broad term that describes positive health aspects relating to cognition, vitality, motivation and reward, and the ability to feel pleasure—concepts that are meaningful to patients. The aim of this systematic literature review was to identify validated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) that can assess any aspect of life engagement in adults, in the field of general mental health.

Methods

This was a systematic literature review of articles in English from the MEDLINE database (date of search: September 9, 2020). The search strategy had three components: (1) terms to capture PROs; (2) terms to capture mental health; and (3) terms to capture aspects of life engagement. Articles were eligible if they included a PRO that: (1) is named; (2) can be used across mental health disorders; (3) is used to assess any aspect of life engagement; and (4) has undergone psychometric validation and/or qualitative content validation. A list of PROs was extracted.

Results

A total of 1585 records were screened and 233 articles were eligible for inclusion. Within these 233 articles, 49 distinct PROs were identified, two of which specifically captured their authors’ interpretation of life engagement: the Engaged Living Scale (ELS) and the Life Engagement Test (LET). However, while the ELS and LET covered motivation and reward, life fulfillment, and value-based living, neither scale captured the cognitive or vitality aspects of life engagement. The remaining identified PROs generally captured single aspects of life engagement, most commonly motivation/reward/energy–apathy, pleasure–anhedonia, and mental/psychological well-being.

Conclusion

Numerous PROs are available that may capture aspects of life engagement. However, a need remains for a new PRO that can be used in clinical trials to provide a more comprehensive description of the improvements in life engagement that patients with mental health disorders may experience with successful treatment.