Sensor-less checkpoint activation?

Genetic and epigenetic features in radiation sensitivity

Recent progress especially in the field of gene identification and expression has attracted greater attention to genetic and epigenetic susceptibility to cancer, possibly enhanced by ionising radiation. It has been proposed that the occurrence and severity of the adverse reactions to radiation therapy are also influenced by such genetic susceptibility. This issue is especially important for radiation therapists since hypersensitive patients may suffer from adverse effects in normal tissues following standard radiation therapy, while normally sensitive patients could receive higher doses of radiation offering a better likelihood of cure for malignant tumours. This paper, the first of two parts, reviews the main mechanisms involved in cell response to ionising radiation. DNA repair machinery and cell signalling pathways are considered and their role in radiosensitivity is analysed. The implication of non-targeted and delayed effects in radiosensitivity is also discussed.

Induction of S. cerevisiae filamentous differentiation by slowed DNA synthesis involves Mec1, Rad53 and Swe1 checkpoint proteins

A key question in eukaryotic differentiation is whether there are common regulators or biochemical events that are required for diverse types of differentiation or whether there is a core mechanism for differentiation. The unicellular model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae undergoes filamentous differentiation in response to environmental cues. Because conserved cell cycle regulators, the mitotic cyclin-dependent kinase Clb2/Cdc28, and its inhibitor Swe1 were found to be involved in both nitrogen starvation- and short chain alcohol-induced filamentous differentiation, they were identified as components of the core mechanism for filamentous differentiation. We report here that slowed DNA synthesis also induces yeast filamentous differentiation through conserved checkpoint proteins Mec1 and Rad53. Swe1 and Clb2 are also involved in this form of differentiation, and the core status of Swe1/Clb2/Cdc28 in the mechanism of filamentous differentiation has therefore been confirmed. Because the cAMP and filamentous growth mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways that mediate nitrogen starvation-induced filamentous differentiation are not required for slowed DNA synthesis-induced filamentous growth, they can therefore be excluded from the core mechanism. More significantly, slowed DNA synthesis also induces differentiation in mammalian cancer cells, and such stimulus conservation may indicate that the core mechanism for yeast filamentous differentiation is conserved in mammalian differentiation.

P53 and radiation responses

Cells have evolved elaborate mechanisms (checkpoints) to monitor genomic integrity in order to ensure the high-fidelity transmission of genetic information. Cells harboring defects in checkpoint pathways respond to DNA damage improperly, which in turn may enhance the rate of cancer development. Ionizing radiation (IR) primarily leads to double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs), which activate DNA damage checkpoints to initiate signals ultimately leading to a binary decision between cell death and cell survival. TP53 has been recognized as an important checkpoint protein, functioning mainly through transcriptional control of target genes that influence multiple response pathways and leading to the diversity of responses to IR in mammalian cells. We review how the tumor suppressor P53 is involved in the complex response to IR to enforce the cell's fate to live by inducing the growth arrest coupled to DNA damage repair or to die by inducing irreversible growth arrest or apoptosis. Moreover, recent insights have emerged in our understanding of how P53 modulates radiosensitivity in tissues following IR as well as its role in sensitizing cells to chemo- and radiotherapy. The P53 pathway remains an attractive target for exploitation in the war on cancer.

Checkpoint activation regulates mutagenic translesion synthesis

Cells have evolved checkpoint responses to arrest or delay the cell cycle, activate DNA repair networks, or induce apoptosis after genomic perturbation. Cells have also evolved the translesion synthesis processes to tolerate genomic lesions by either error-free or error-prone repair. Here, we show that after a replication perturbation, cells exhibit a mutator phenotype, which can be significantly affected by mutations in the checkpoint elements Cds1 and Rad17 or translesion synthesis polymerases DinB and Polzeta. Cells respond to genomic perturbation by up-regulation of DinB in a checkpoint activation-dependent manner. Moreover, association of DinB with chromatin is dependent on functional Rad17, and DinB physically interacts with the checkpoint-clamp components Hus1 and Rad1. Thus, translesion synthesis is a part of the checkpoint response.

Activation of GCN2 in UV-irradiated cells inhibits translation

BACKGROUND

Mammalian cells subjected to ultraviolet (UV) irradiation actively repress DNA replication, transcription, and mRNA translation. While the effects of UV irradiation on DNA replication and transcription have been extensively studied, the mechanism(s) responsible for translational repression are poorly understood.

RESULTS

Here, we demonstrate that UV irradiation elicits phosphorylation of the alpha subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2alpha) by activating the kinase GCN2 in a manner that does not require SAPK/JNK or p38 MAP kinase. GCN2-/- cells, and cells expressing nonphosphorylatable eIF2alpha as their only source of eIF2alpha protein, fail to repress translation in response to UV irradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide a mechanism for translation inhibition by UV irradiation and identify a hitherto unrecognized role for mammalian GCN2 as a mediator of the cellular response to UV stress.

Defending genome integrity during S-phase: putative roles for RecQ helicases and topoisomerase III

The maintenance of genome stability is important not only for cell viability, but also for the suppression of neoplastic transformation in higher eukaryotes. It has long been recognised that a common feature of cancer cells is genomic instability. Although the so-called three 'Rs' of genome maintenance, DNA replication, recombination and repair, have historically been studied in isolation, a wealth of recent evidence indicates that these processes are intimately interrelated and interdependent. In this article, we will focus on challenges to the maintenance of genome integrity that arise during the S-phase of the cell cycle, and the possible roles that RecQ helicases and topoisomerase III play in the maintenance of genome integrity during the process of DNA replication.

Fission yeast Rad17 associates with chromatin in response to aberrant genomic structures

Fission yeast checkpoint protein Rad17 is required for the DNA integrity checkpoint responses. A fraction of Rad17 is chromatin bound independent of the other checkpoint proteins throughout the cell cycle. Here we show that in response to DNA damage induced by either methyl methanesulfonate treatment or ionizing radiation, increased levels of Rad17 bind to chromatin. Following S-phase stall induced by hydroxyurea or a cdc22 mutation, the chromatin-bound Rad17 progressively dissociates from the chromatin. After S-phase arrest by hydroxyurea in cds1Delta or rad3Delta cells or by replication mutants, Rad17 remains chromatin bound. Rad17 is able to complex in vivo with an Rfc small subunit, Rfc2, but not with Rfc1. Furthermore, cells with rfc1Delta are checkpoint proficient, suggesting that Rfc1 does not have a role in checkpoint function. A checkpoint-defective mutant protein, Rad17(K118E), which has similar nuclear localization to that of the wild type, is unable to bind ATP and has reduced ability in chromatin binding. Mutant Rad17(K118E) protein also has reduced ability to complex with Rfc2, suggesting that Lys(118) of Rad17 plays a role in Rad17-Rfc small-subunit complex formation and chromatin association. However, in the rad17.K118E mutant cells, Cds1 can be activated by hydroxyurea. Together, these results suggest that Rad17 binds to chromatin in response to an aberrant genomic structure generated from DNA damage, replication mutant arrest, or hydroxyurea arrest in the absence of Cds1. Rad17 is not required to bind chromatin when genomic structures are protected by hydroxyurea-activated Cds1. The possible checkpoint events induced by chromatin-bound Rad17 are discussed.

DNA-PK, ATM and ATR as sensors of DNA damage: variations on a theme?

The DNA damage signalling pathway is a core element of the cellular response to genotoxic insult, and its components play key roles in defending against neoplastic transformation. Recent work has indicated that the human ATM and ATR proteins, and their yeast homologues, are intimately involved in sensing DNA damage, suggesting parallels with the DNA double-strand break repair enzyme DNA-PK.

Telomeres and their control

Telomeres are DNA and protein structures that form complexes protecting the ends of chromosomes. Understanding of the mechanisms maintaining telomeres and insights into their function have advanced considerably in recent years. This review summarizes the currently known components of the telomere/telomerase functional complex, and focuses on how they act in the control of processes occurring at telomeres. These include processes acting on the telomeric DNA and on telomeric proteins. Key among them are DNA replication and elongation of one telomeric DNA strand by telomerase. In some situations, homologous recombination of telomeric and subtelomeric DNA is induced. All these processes act to replenish or restore telomeres. Conversely, degradative processes that shorten telomeric DNA, and nonhomologous end-joining of telomeric DNA, can lead to loss of telomere function and genomic instability. Hence they too must normally be tightly controlled.