Comments on the chemistry of scotophobin

Rip it up and start again: The rejection of a characterization of a phenomenon

In this paper, I investigate the nature of empirical findings that provide evidence for the characterization of a scientific phenomenon, and the defeasible nature of this evidence. To do so, I explore an exemplary instance of the rejection of a characterization of a scientific phenomenon: memory transfer. I examine the reason why the characterization of memory transfer was rejected, and analyze how this rejection tied to researchers' failures to resolve experimental issues relating to replication and confounds. I criticize the presentation of the case by Harry Collins and Trevor Pinch, who claim that no sufficient reason was provided to abandon research on memory transfer. I argue that skeptics about memory transfer adopted what I call a defeater strategy, in which researchers exploit the defeasibility of the evidence for a characterization of a phenomenon.

Georges Ungar and memory transfer

The idea that memories could be transferred from one organism to another by administration of a "trained" donor brain to a naive recipient seized both scientific and public attention in the 1960's and early 1970's. Georges Ungar was one of the earliest and strongest proponents of this idea, and he provided it extensive theoretical and experimental support. This paper reviews Ungar's work on memory transfer (and in particular on the scotophobin molecule), with an analysis of its successes and failures.

Interanimal transferability of taste aversion learning for 0.1% saccharin

Three experiments were performed to assess the interanimal transferability of conditioned taste aversion to 0.1% saccharin. Two experiments used an intracerebrospinal fluid (subdural) route for administering brain extracts and a third used an intraperitoneal (IP) route. As assessed by repeated measurements ANOVA, saccharin consumption was significantly lower during extinction of conditioned aversion for experimental recipients (ER) receiving extracts from aversively conditioned donors, than that of control recipients (CR), receiving extracts from unconditioned donors in one subdural experiment, F(21, 189) = 1.61, p less than 0.05. In the IP experiment the results were in the same direction, though not significant, F(34, 238) = 1.39, p less than 0.1. Results of the other subdural experiment are discussed. It is concluded that these experiments with the conditioned taste aversion paradigm have potential as a model for investigations of behavioral interanimal transfer (BIT) and for neuromolecular research aimed at identification of associated putative neurochemical(s) and the elaboration of their mechanism of action.

Is chemical memory transfer due to shock or behavior training?

A memory transfer experiment was performed to determine whether the transfer effect is due to stress associated with the foot shock or to the specific behavioral training. Recipient animals were significantly better in the 'jump-out' testing than either the shock-control recipients or the control recipients, but the shock-control recipients performed significantly better than the control recipients. Foot shock has an effect on the transfer phenomena but is not responsible for the entire effect.

Peptides from pigeon cerebrum: two-dimensional fingerprinting and amino acid analysis

The number and heterogeneity of endogenous peptides from pigeon cerebrum were studied by two-dimensional peptide fingerprinting. A highly consistent pattern of 8-9 peptides in the 1000-5000 molecular weight range was obtained from each cerebral sample. Amino acid analysis of the peptide material indicated that 30% of the identified residues were dicarboxylic amino acids and 30% were alphatic amino acids. There was no evidence for the presence of arginine or half-cystine in the peptide fraction.

Research in neurosis: a selective review. 1. Causes and courses

Research in neurosis is reviewed from the standpoint of genetics, phylogenesis, physiology, epidemiology, and prognosis. Family and sociocultural variables are discussed, and experimental paradigms noted. Directions for further research are suggested in these areas, including perceptual and physiological reflex mechanisms triggered in neurosis and in normal people, cross-cultural longitudinal epidemiological studies of specific neurotic syndromes which are linked to family and social variables, factors governing illness behaviour, and field observations of family and marital pathology.