Mechanism of ribosome frameshifting during translation of the genetic code

Slippy-Sloppy translation: a tale of programmed and induced-ribosomal frameshifting

Programmed ribosomal frameshifting (PRF) is a key mechanism that viruses use to generate essential proteins for replication, and as a means of regulating gene expression. PRF generally involves recoding signals or frameshift stimulators to elevate the occurrence of frameshifting at shift-prone 'slippery' sequences. Given its essential role in viral replication, targeting PRF was envisioned as an attractive tool to block viral infection. However, in contrast to controlled-PRF mechanisms, recent studies have shown that ribosomes of many human cancer cell types are prone to frameshifting upon amino acid shortage; thus, these cells are deemed to be sloppy. The resulting products of a sloppy frameshift at the 'hungry' codons are aberrant proteins the degradation and display of which at the cell surface can trigger T cell activation. In this review, we address recent discoveries in ribosomal frameshifting and their functional consequences for the proteome in human cancer cells.

The role of GTP hydrolysis by EF-G in ribosomal translocation

Translocation of transfer RNA (tRNA) and messenger RNA (mRNA) through the ribosome is catalyzed by the GTPase elongation factor G (EF-G) in bacteria. Although guanosine-5'-triphosphate (GTP) hydrolysis accelerates translocation and is required for dissociation of EF-G, its fundamental role remains unclear. Here, we used ensemble Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) to monitor how inhibition of GTP hydrolysis impacts the structural dynamics of the ribosome. We used FRET pairs S12-S19 and S11-S13, which unambiguously report on rotation of the 30S head domain, and the S6-L9 pair, which measures intersubunit rotation. Our results show that, in addition to slowing reverse intersubunit rotation, as shown previously, blocking GTP hydrolysis slows forward head rotation. Surprisingly, blocking GTP hydrolysis completely abolishes reverse head rotation. We find that the S13-L33 FRET pair, which has been used in previous studies to monitor head rotation, appears to report almost exclusively on intersubunit rotation. Furthermore, we find that the signal from quenching of 3'-terminal pyrene-labeled mRNA, which is used extensively to follow mRNA translocation, correlates most closely with reverse intersubunit rotation. To account for our finding that blocking GTP hydrolysis abolishes a rotational event that occurs after the movements of mRNA and tRNAs are essentially complete, we propose that the primary role of GTP hydrolysis is to create an irreversible step in a mechanism that prevents release of EF-G until both the tRNAs and mRNA have moved by one full codon, ensuring productive translocation and maintenance of the translational reading frame.

Oncogene-dependent sloppiness in mRNA translation

mRNA translation is a highly conserved and tightly controlled mechanism for protein synthesis. Despite protein quality control mechanisms, amino acid shortage in melanoma induces aberrant proteins by ribosomal frameshifting. The extent and the underlying mechanisms related to this phenomenon are yet unknown. Here, we show that tryptophan depletion-induced ribosomal frameshifting is a widespread phenomenon in cancer. We termed this event sloppiness and strikingly observed its association with MAPK pathway hyperactivation. Sloppiness is stimulated by RAS activation in primary cells, suppressed by pharmacological inhibition of the oncogenic MAPK pathway in sloppy cells, and restored in cells with acquired resistance to MAPK pathway inhibition. Interestingly, sloppiness causes aberrant peptide presentation at the cell surface, allowing recognition and specific killing of drug-resistant cancer cells by T lymphocytes. Thus, while oncogenes empower cancer progression and aggressiveness, they also expose a vulnerability by provoking the production of aberrant peptides through sloppiness.

From Recoding to Peptides for MHC Class I Immune Display: Enriching Viral Expression, Virus Vulnerability and Virus Evasion

Many viruses, especially RNA viruses, utilize programmed ribosomal frameshifting and/or stop codon readthrough in their expression, and in the decoding of a few a UGA is dynamically redefined to specify selenocysteine. This recoding can effectively increase viral coding capacity and generate a set ratio of products with the same N-terminal domain(s) but different C-terminal domains. Recoding can also be regulatory or generate a product with the non-universal 21st directly encoded amino acid. Selection for translation speed in the expression of many viruses at the expense of fidelity creates host immune defensive opportunities. In contrast to host opportunism, certain viruses, including some persistent viruses, utilize recoding or adventitious frameshifting as part of their strategy to evade an immune response or specific drugs. Several instances of recoding in small intensively studied viruses escaped detection for many years and their identification resolved dilemmas. The fundamental importance of ribosome ratcheting is consistent with the initial strong view of invariant triplet decoding which however did not foresee the possibility of transitory anticodon:codon dissociation. Deep level dynamics and structural understanding of recoding is underway, and a high level structure relevant to the frameshifting required for expression of the SARS CoV-2 genome has just been determined.

Regulators of Viral Frameshifting: More Than RNA Influences Translation Events

Programmed ribosomal frameshifting (PRF) is a conserved translational recoding mechanism found in all branches of life and viruses. In bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes PRF is used to downregulate protein production by inducing a premature termination of translation, which triggers messenger RNA (mRNA) decay. In viruses, PRF is used to drive the production of a new protein while downregulating the production of another protein, thus maintaining a stoichiometry optimal for productive infection. Traditionally, PRF motifs have been defined by the characteristics of two cis elements: a slippery heptanucleotide sequence followed by an RNA pseudoknot or stem-loop within the mRNA. Recently, additional cis and new trans elements have been identified that regulate PRF in both host and viral translation. These additional factors suggest PRF is an evolutionarily conserved process whose function and regulation we are just beginning to understand.

Ribosomal frameshifting and transcriptional slippage: From genetic steganography and cryptography to adventitious use

Genetic decoding is not ‘frozen’ as was earlier thought, but dynamic. One facet of this is frameshifting that often results in synthesis of a C-terminal region encoded by a new frame. Ribosomal frameshifting is utilized for the synthesis of additional products, for regulatory purposes and for translational ‘correction’ of problem or ‘savior’ indels. Utilization for synthesis of additional products occurs prominently in the decoding of mobile chromosomal element and viral genomes. One class of regulatory frameshifting of stable chromosomal genes governs cellular polyamine levels from yeasts to humans. In many cases of productively utilized frameshifting, the proportion of ribosomes that frameshift at a shift-prone site is enhanced by specific nascent peptide or mRNA context features. Such mRNA signals, which can be 5′ or 3′ of the shift site or both, can act by pairing with ribosomal RNA or as stem loops or pseudoknots even with one component being 4 kb 3′ from the shift site. Transcriptional realignment at slippage-prone sequences also generates productively utilized products encoded trans-frame with respect to the genomic sequence. This too can be enhanced by nucleic acid structure. Together with dynamic codon redefinition, frameshifting is one of the forms of recoding that enriches gene expression.

A gripping tale of ribosomal frameshifting: extragenic suppressors of frameshift mutations spotlight P-site realignment

Mutants of translation components which compensate for both -1 and +1 frameshift mutations showed the first evidence for framing malleability. Those compensatory mutants isolated in bacteria and yeast with altered tRNA or protein factors are reviewed here and are considered to primarily cause altered P-site realignment and not altered translocation. Though the first sequenced tRNA mutant which suppressed a +1 frameshift mutation had an extra base in its anticodon loop and led to a textbook "yardstick" model in which the number of anticodon bases determines codon size, this model has long been discounted, although not by all. Accordingly, the reviewed data suggest that reading frame maintenance and translocation are two distinct features of the ribosome. None of the -1 tRNA suppressors have anticodon loops with fewer than the standard seven nucleotides. Many of the tRNA mutants potentially affect tRNA bending and/or stability and can be used for functional assays, and one has the conserved C74 of the 3' CCA substituted. The effect of tRNA modification deficiencies on framing has been particularly informative. The properties of some mutants suggest the use of alternative tRNA anticodon loop stack conformations by individual tRNAs in one translation cycle. The mutant proteins range from defective release factors with delayed decoding of A-site stop codons facilitating P-site frameshifting to altered EF-Tu/EF1alpha to mutant ribosomal large- and small-subunit proteins L9 and S9. Their study is revealing how mRNA slippage is restrained except where it is programmed to occur and be utilized.

Antisense-induced ribosomal frameshifting

Programmed ribosomal frameshifting provides a mechanism to decode information located in two overlapping reading frames by diverting a proportion of translating ribosomes into a second open reading frame (ORF). The result is the production of two proteins: the product of standard translation from ORF1 and an ORF1-ORF2 fusion protein. Such programmed frameshifting is commonly utilized as a gene expression mechanism in viruses that infect eukaryotic cells and in a subset of cellular genes. RNA secondary structures, consisting of pseudoknots or stem-loops, located downstream of the shift site often act as cis-stimulators of frameshifting. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that antisense oligonucleotides can functionally mimic these RNA structures to induce +1 ribosomal frameshifting when annealed downstream of the frameshift site, UCC UGA. Antisense-induced shifting of the ribosome into the +1 reading frame is highly efficient in both rabbit reticulocyte lysate translation reactions and in cultured mammalian cells. The efficiency of antisense-induced frameshifting at this site is responsive to the sequence context 5' of the shift site and to polyamine levels.

Evolutionary specialization of recoding: frameshifting in the expression of S. cerevisiae antizyme mRNA is via an atypical antizyme shift site but is still +1

An autoregulatory translational shift to the +1 frame is required for the expression of ornithine decarboxylase antizyme from fungi to mammals. In most eukaryotes, including all vertebrates and a majority of the studied fungi/yeast, the site on antizyme mRNA where the shift occurs is UCC-UGA. The mechanism of the frameshift on this sequence likely involves nearly universal aspects of the eukaryotic translational machinery. Nevertheless, a mammalian antizyme frameshift cassette yields predominantly -2 frameshift in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, instead of the +1 in mammals. The recently identified endogenous S. cerevisiae antizyme mRNA has an atypical shift site: UGC-GCG-UGA. It is shown here that endogenous S. cerevisiae antizyme frameshifting is +1 rather than -2. We discuss how antizyme frameshifting in budding yeasts exploits peculiarities of their tRNA balance, and relate this to prior studies on Ty frameshifting.

P-site tRNA is a crucial initiator of ribosomal frameshifting

The expression of some genes requires a high proportion of ribosomes to shift at a specific site into one of the two alternative frames. This utilized frameshifting provides a unique tool for studying reading frame control. Peptidyl-tRNA slippage has been invoked to explain many cases of programmed frameshifting. The present work extends this to other cases. When the A-site is unoccupied, the P-site tRNA can be repositioned forward with respect to mRNA (although repositioning in the minus direction is also possible). A kinetic model is presented for the influence of both, the cognate tRNAs competing for overlapping codons in A-site, and the stabilities of P-site tRNA:mRNA complexes in the initial and new frames. When the A-site is occupied, the P-site tRNA can be repositioned backward. Whether frameshifting will happen depends on the ability of the A-site tRNA to subsequently be repositioned to maintain physical proximity of the tRNAs. This model offers an alternative explanation to previously published mechanisms of programmed frameshifting, such as out-of-frame tRNA binding, and a different perspective on simultaneous tandem tRNA slippage.

Transfer RNA modifications that alter +1 frameshifting in general fail to affect -1 frameshifting

Using mutants (tgt, mnmA(asuE, trmU), mnmE(trmE), miaA, miaB, miaE, truA(hisT), truB) of either Escherichia coli or Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and the trm5 mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we have analyzed the influence by the modified nucleosides Q34, mnm(5)s(2)U34, ms(2)io(6)A37, Psi39, Psi55, m(1)G37, and yW37 on -1 frameshifts errors at various heptameric sequences, at which at least one codon is decoded by tRNAs having these modified nucleosides. The frequency of -1 frameshifting was the same in congenic strains only differing in the allelic state of the various tRNA modification genes. In fact, in one case (deficiency of mnm(5)s(2)U34), we observed a reduced ability of the undermodified tRNA to make a -1 frameshift error. These results are in sharp contrast to earlier observations that tRNA modification prevents +1 frameshifting suggesting that the mechanisms by which -1 and +1 frameshift errors occur are different. Possible mechanisms explaining these results are discussed.

Expanding the genetic code: selection of efficient suppressors of four-base codons and identification of "shifty" four-base codons with a library approach in Escherichia coli

Naturally occurring tRNA mutants are known that suppress +1 frameshift mutations by means of an extended anticodon loop, and a few have been used in protein mutagenesis. In an effort to expand the number of possible ways to uniquely and efficiently encode unnatural amino acids, we have devised a general strategy to select tRNAs with the ability to suppress four-base codons from a library of tRNAs with randomized 8 or 9 nt anticodon loops. Our selectants included both known and novel suppressible four-base codons and resulted in a set of very efficient, non-cross-reactive tRNA/four-base codon pairs for AGGA, UAGA, CCCU and CUAG. The most efficient four-base codon suppressors had Watson-Crick complementary anticodons, and the sequences of the anticodon loops outside of the anticodons varied with the anticodon. Additionally, four-base codon reporter libraries were used to identify "shifty" sites at which +1 frameshifting is most favorable in the absence of suppressor tRNAs in Escherichia coli. We intend to use these tRNAs to explore the limits of unnatural polypeptide biosynthesis, both in vitro and eventually in vivo. In addition, this selection strategy is being extended to identify novel five- and six-base codon suppressors.

Coupling of open reading frames by translational bypassing

Translational bypassing joins the information found within two disparate open reading frames into a single polypeptide chain. The underlying mechanism centers on the decoding properties of peptidyl-transfer RNA (tRNA) and involves three stages: take-off, scanning, and landing. In take-off, the peptidyl-tRNA/messenger RNA (mRNA) complex in the P site of the ribosome dissociates, and the mRNA begins to move through the ribosome. In scanning, the peptidyl-tRNA probes the mRNA sliding through the decoding center. In landing, the peptidyl-tRNA re-pairs with a codon with which it can form a stable interaction. Although few examples of genes are known that rely on translational bypassing to couple open reading frames, ribosomes appear to have an innate capacity for bypassing. This suggests that the strategy of translational bypassing may be more common than presently appreciated. The best characterized example of this phenomenon is T4 gene 60, in which a complex set of signals stimulates bypassing of 50 nucleotides between the two open reading frames. In this review, we focus on the bypassing mechanism of gene 60 in terms of take-off, scanning, and landing.

One protein from two open reading frames: mechanism of a 50 nt translational bypass

Translating ribosomes bypass a 50 nt coding gap in order to fuse the information found in the two open reading frames (ORFs) of bacteriophage T4 gene 60. This study investigates the underlying mechanism by focusing on the competition between initiation of bypassing and termination at the end of the first ORF. While nearly all ribosomes initiate bypassing, no more than 50% resume translation in the second ORF. Two previously described cis-acting stimulatory signals are critical for favoring initiation of bypassing over termination. Genetic analysis of these signals supports a working model in which the first (a stem-loop structure at the junction between the first ORF and the coding gap) interferes with decoding in the A-site, and the second (a stretch of amino acids in the nascent peptide encoded by the first ORF) destabilizes peptidyl-tRNA-mRNA pairing.

Translational frameshifting: implications for the mechanism of translational frame maintenance

The ribosome rapidly translates the information in the nucleic sequence of mRNA into the amino acid sequence of proteins. As with any biological process, translation is not completely accurate; it must compromise the antagonistic demands of increased speed and greater accuracy. Yet, reading-frame errors are especially infrequent, occurring at least 10 times less frequently than other errors. How do ribosomes maintain the reading frame so faithfully? Geneticists have addressed this question by identifying suppressors that increase error frequency. Most familiar are the frameshift suppressor tRNAs, though other suppressors include mutant forms of rRNA, ribosomal proteins, or translation factors. Certain mRNA sequences can also program frameshifting by normal ribosomes. The models of suppression and programmed frameshifting describe apparently quite different mechanisms. Contemporary work has questioned the long-accepted model for frameshift suppression by mutant tRNAs, and a unified explanation has been proposed for both phenomena. The Quadruplet Translocation Model proposes that suppressor tRNAs cause frameshifting by recognizing an expanded mRNA codon. The new data are inconsistent with this model for some tRNAs, implying the model may be invalid for all. A new model for frameshift suppression involves slippage caused by a weak, near-cognate codon.anticodon interaction. This strongly resembles the mechanism of +1 programmed frameshifting. This may mean that infrequent frameshift errors by normal ribosomes may result from two successive errors: misreading by a near-cognate tRNA, which causes a subsequent shift in reading frame. Ribosomes may avoid phenotypically serious frame errors by restricting apparently innocuous errors of sense.

Programmed translational frameshifting

Errors that alter the reading frame occur extremely rarely during translation, yet some genes have evolved sequences that efficiently induce frameshifting. These sequences, termed programmed frameshift sites, manipulate the translational apparatus to promote non-canonical decoding. Frameshifts are mechanistically diverse. Most cause a -1 shift of frames; the first such site was discovered in a metazoan retrovirus, but they are now known to be dispersed quite widely among evolutionarily diverse species. +1 frameshift sites are much less common, but again dispersed widely. The rarest form are the translational hop sites which program the ribosome to bypass a region of several dozen nucleotides. Each of these types of events are stimulated by distinct mechanisms. All of the events share a common phenomenology in which the programmed frameshift site causes the ribosome to pause during elongation so that the kinetically unfavorable alternative decoding event can occur. During this pause most frameshifts occur because one or more ribosome-bound tRNAs slip between cognate or near-cognate codons. However, even this generalization is not entirely consistent, since some frameshifts occur without slippage. Because of their similarity to rarer translational errors, programmed frameshift sites provide a tool with which to probe the mechanism of frame maintenance.

CCC.UGA: a new site of ribosomal frameshifting in Escherichia coli

To activate expression of a human transferrin (Tf)-encoding cDNA in Escherichia coli by translational coupling, it was placed in an expression plasmid downstream from a 5'-terminal fragment from the replicase (R)-encoding gene of bacteriophage MS2. The resulting construct was found to produce, besides the desired Tf, a protein with the mobility of a fusion product (RTf) of the N-terminal R fragment and Tf. Analysis of available mutants showed that this fusion results from +1 ribosomal frameshifting at the end of the R reading frame. This region contains the sequence, CCC.UGA, suggesting that before termination occurs, tRNA(Pro) may dislodge from the CCC codon and reassociate with the +1 triplet CCU. By further site-directed mutagenesis, we demonstrate that both the CCC codon and the termination codon are indeed required for the observed 2-4% frameshifting. When either triplet is changed, the frequency of frameshifting drops to 0.3% or less. These results classify CCC.UGA as a new '+1 shifty stop'.

The function of a ribosomal frameshifting signal from human immunodeficiency virus-1 in Escherichia coli

A 15-17 nucleotide sequence from the gag-pol ribosome frameshift site of HIV-1 directs analogous ribosomal frameshifting in Escherichia coli. Limitation for leucine, which is encoded precisely at the frameshift site, dramatically increased the frequency of leftward frameshifting. Limitation for phenylalanine or arginine, which are encoded just before and just after the frameshift, did not significantly affect frameshifting. Protein sequence analysis demonstrated the occurrence of two closely related frameshift mechanisms. In the first, ribosomes appear to bind leucyl-tRNA at the frameshift site and then slip leftward. This is the 'simultaneous slippage' mechanism. In the second, ribosomes appear to slip before binding aminoacyl-tRNA, and then bind phenylalanyl-tRNA, which is encoded in the left-shifted reading frame. This mechanism is identical to the 'overlapping reading' we have demonstrated at other bacterial frameshift sites. The HIV-1 sequence is prone to frame-shifting by both mechanisms in E. coli.

A ribosomal frameshifting error during translation of the argI mRNA of Escherichia coli

Using fusions between the Escherichia coli genes argI and lacZ, it has been demonstrated that ribosomal frameshifting occurs at a frequency of between 3% and 16% within the argI mRNA, soon after the initiation codon. The frameshift involves a phenylalanyl-tRNA shifting into the +1 frame at the sequence UUU-U/C. The shift does not occur if the in-frame phenylalanine codon UUU is replaced by UUC. The level of frameshifting is higher in dense cultures and is not dependent on phenylalanine starvation. In the wild-type argI gene this frameshifting event would be an error, leading to a truncated, non-functional protein. Therefore, it is unlike the numerous examples of required frameshifting events that have been described in other genes.

Competition between frameshifting, termination and suppression at the frameshift site in the Escherichia coli release factor-2 mRNA

Competition between frameshifting, termination, and suppression at the frameshifting site in the release factor-2 (RF-2) mRNA was determined in vitro using a coupled transcription-translation system by adding a UGA suppressor tRNA. The expression system was programmed with a plasmid containing a trpE-prfB fusion gene so that each of the products of the competing events could be measured. With increasing concentrations of suppressor tRNA the readthrough product increased at the expense of both the termination and the frameshifting product indicating all three processes are in direct competition. The readthrough at the internal UGA termination codon was greater than that at the natural UGA termination codon at the end of the coding sequence. The results suggest that this enhanced suppression may reflect slower decoding of the internal stop codon by the release factor giving suppression a competitive advantage. The internal UGAC stop signal at the frameshift site has been proposed to be a relatively poor signal, but in addition the release factor may be less able to recognise the signal with the mRNA in such a constrained state. Consequently, the frameshifting event itself will be more competitive with termination in vivo because of this longer pause as the release factor is decoding the stop signal.

A novel programed frameshift expresses the POL3 gene of retrotransposon Ty3 of yeast: frameshifting without tRNA slippage

Most retroviruses and retrotransposons express their pol gene as a translational fusion to the upstream gag gene, often involving translational frameshifting. We describe here an unusual translational frameshift event occurring between the GAG3 and POL3 genes of the retrotransposon Ty3 of yeast. A +1 frameshift occurs within the sequence GCG AGU U (shown as codons of GAG3), encoding alanine-valine (GCG A GUU). Unlike other programed translational frameshifts described, this event does not require tRNA slippage between cognate or near-cognate codons in the mRNA. Two features distal to the GCG codon stimulate frameshifting. The low availability of the tRNA specific for the "hungry" serine codon, AGU, induces a translational pause required for frameshifting. A sequence of 12 nt distal to the AGU codon (termed the Ty3 "context") also stimulates the event.

Increased ribosomal accuracy increases a programmed translational frameshift in Escherichia coli

We have tested the effect of increased ribosomal fidelity on a modified version of the programmed release factor 2 (RF2) translational frameshift. In the constructs tested, the original UGA codon at the site of the shift was replaced by either of two sense codons, UGG (tryptophan), which allows a frameshift of approximately 13%, or CUG (leucine), which allows a frameshift of only approximately 2%. We confirmed the results of Curran and Yarus [Curran, J. F. & Yarus, M. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 209, 65-77] in a wild-type ribosomal host, including a reduction of the UGG shift following induction of tRNA(Trp) from a plasmid copy of the tRNA gene. But to our surprise, in a hyperaccurate streptomycin pseudo-dependent host, the UGG frameshift increased to more than 50%. When we added a tRNA(Trp) plasmid to these cells, induction of the tRNA(Trp) gene reduced the shift back to approximately 7%. Messenger RNA levels did not vary greatly under these different induced conditions. Other increased accuracy alleles also showed increased frameshifting with UGG at the frameshift site. All increased accuracy alleles led to slower translation rates, and there appeared to be a proportionality between the extent of reduction of synthesis for the in-frame reporter and the extent of UGG frameshift for the out-of-frame reporter. There were little effects of increased accuracy on the lower level CUG frameshift. However, over-production of the cognate tRNA(1Leu) dramatically reduced even this lower level of shift, despite the fact that tRNA(1Leu) is already the most abundant isoacceptor in Escherichia coli. These results can be rationalized by following the hypothesis of Curran and Yarus as follows: with wild-type ribosomes, limited availability of tRNA(Trp) (about 1% of total tRNA) facilitates a pause at the UGG codon (due to the vacant A site), allowing increased opportunity for ribosome realignment. Excess tRNA(Trp) reduces the time the A site is vacant and thus reduces the frameshift. The slower hyperaccurate ribosomes increase the pause time and thus increase the opportunity for shifting, a process again reversed by increasing the in-frame cognate tRNA(Trp). These data provide strong support for a model in which the extent of ribosome pause time at a programmed frameshift site is a major determinant in the efficiency of the frameshift and in which tRNA availability can be a major influence on this process.

Novel in-frame two codon translational hop during synthesis of bovine placental lactogen in a recombinant strain of Escherichia coli

A recombinant Escherichia coli strain was constructed for the overexpression of bovine placental lactogen (bPL), using a bPL structural gene containing 9 of the rare arginine codons AGA and AGG. When high level bPL synthesis was induced in this strain, cell growth was inhibited and bPL accumulated to less than 10% of total cell protein. In addition, about 2% of the recombinant bPL produced from this strain exhibited an altered trypsin digestion pattern. Amino acid residues 74 through 109 normally produce 2 tryptic peptides, but the altered form of bPL lacked these two peptides and instead had a new peptide which was missing arginine residue 86 and one of the two flanking leucine residues. The codon for arginine residue 86 was AGG and the codons for the flanking leucine residues 85 and 87 were TTG. When 5 of the 9 AGA and AGG codons in the bPL structural gene were changed to more preferred arginine codons, cell growth was not inhibited and bPL accumulated to about 30% of total cell protein. When bPL was purified from this modified strain, which included changing the arginine codon at position 86 from AGG to CGT, none of the altered form of bPL was produced. These observations are consistent with a model in which translational pausing occurs at the arginine residue 86 AGG codon because the corresponding arginyl-tRNA species is reduced by the high level of bPL synthesis, and a translational hop occurs from the leucine residue 85 TTG codon to the leucine residue 87 TTG codon. This observation represents the first report of an error in protein synthesis due to an in-frame translational hop within an open reading frame.

Leftward ribosome frameshifting at a hungry codon

Previous experiments have shown that limitation for certain aminoacyl-tRNA species results in phenotypic suppression of a subset of frameshift mutant alleles, including members in both the (+) and (-) incorrect reading frames. Here, we demonstrate that such phenotypic suppression can occur through a ribosome reading frame shift at a hungry AAG codon calling for lysyl-tRNA in short supply. Direct amino acid sequence analysis of the product and DNA sequence manipulation of the gene demonstrate that the ribosome frameshift occurs through a movement of one base to the left, so as to decode the triplet overlapping the hungry codon from the left or 5' side, followed by continued normal translation in the new, shifted reading frame.

Bacteriophage T7 morphogenesis and gene 10 frameshifting in Escherichia coli showing different degrees of ribosomal fidelity

Bacteriophage T7 infection has been studied in Escherichia coli strains showing both increased and decreased ribosome fidelity and in the presence of streptomycin, which stimulates translational misreading, in an effort to determine effects on the apparent programmed translational frameshift that occurs during synthesis of the gene 10 capsid protein. Quantitation of the protein bands from SDS-PAGE failed to detect any significant effects on the amounts of the shifted 10B protein relative to the in-frame 10A protein under all fidelity conditions tested. However, any changes in fidelity conditions led to inhibition of phage morphogenesis in single-step growth experiments, which could not be accounted for by reduced amounts of phage protein synthesis, nor, at least in the case of decreased accuracy, by reduced amounts of phage DNA synthesis. Reduction in phage DNA synthesis did appear to account for a substantial proportion of the reduction in phage yield seen under conditions of increased accuracy. Similar effects of varying ribosomal fidelity on growth were also seen with phage T3, and to a lesser extent with phage T4. The absence of change in the high-frequency T7 gene 10 frameshift differs from earlier reports that ribosomal fidelity affects low-frequency frameshift errors.

Novel mutants of elongation factor G

A novel mutant form of elongation factor G (EF-G) in Escherichia coli is described. This variant EF-G restricts reading frame errors by a factor of 2 to 3 in vivo at two different positions in a lacIZ fusion. In addition, a conventional fusidic acid resistant (fusR) mutant of EF-G was compared with the restrictive mutant. Both mutants were characterized in vitro in a steady-state poly(U) translating system. The data indicate that the restrictive EF-G variant has an altered interaction with the ribosome both in vivo and in vitro. In contrast, the conventional fusR variant is altered in its interaction with GTP, which is evident in vitro.

The signal for the termination of protein synthesis in procaryotes

The sequences around the stop codons of 862 Escherichia coli genes have been analysed to identify any additional features which contribute to the signal for the termination of protein synthesis. Highly significant deviations from the expected nucleotide distribution were observed, both before and after the stop codon. Immediately prior to UAA stop codons in E. coli there is a preference for codons of the form NAR (any base, adenine, purine), and in particular those that code for glutamine or the basic amino acids. In contrast, codons for threonine or branched nonpolar amino acids were under-represented. Uridine was over-represented in the nucleotide position immediately following all three stop codons, whereas adenine and cytosine were under-represented. This pattern is accentuated in highly expressed genes, but is not as marked in either lowly expressed genes or those that terminate in UAG, the codon specifically recognised by polypeptide chain release factor-1. These observations suggest that for the efficient termination of protein synthesis in E. coli, the 'stop signal' may be a tetranucleotide, rather than simply a tri-nucleotide codon, and that polypeptide chain release factor-2 recognises this extended signal. The sequence following stop codons was analysed in genes from several other procaryotes and bacteriophages. Salmonella typhimurium, Bacillus subtilis, bacteriophages and the methanogenic archaebacteria showed a similar bias to E. coli.

Codon contexts from weakly expressed genes reduce expression in vivo

Nucleotides that neighbor codons in Escherichia coli genes are highly non-random. Furthermore, these context biases are stronger and extend farther from the codon in weakly expressed than in highly expressed genes. We therefore suggested that codon contexts are selected to reduce gene expression levels. We now compare the expression levels of lacZ genes containing two specific coding sequences (context inserts). One context insert represents contexts seen in weakly expressed genes (low variant); the other represents contexts seen in highly expressed genes (high variant). The two variants have identical nucleotide and codon compositions, and encode the same protein. A permutation of four nucleotides, which changes eight codon:codon interfaces of 1043, comprises the only difference between the high and low context variant genes. In three different lacZ mRNAs, the low variant was expressed at a level significantly below that of the high variant. This context effect depends entirely on translation of the contexts in the correct frame; its magnitude depends in part on the placement of other features (e.g. transcriptional pauses and terminators, or perhaps other slow codons or contexts) in the mRNAs. Changing the ribosome density on the message by changing the ribosome binding site distinguishes between dropoff, interference and polarity, three fundamentally different types of models for the context effect. The expression difference between context variants is eliminated by both increases and decreases in the ribosome initiation frequency, as uniquely predicted by the polarity model. In fact, data from all constructions are accommodated by a model in which slow translation of the low context insert increases rho-dependent transcriptional termination within the test gene. The data suggest that the rates of translational initiation and elongation are poised with respect to the rate of transcriptional elongation so that all are influential in setting the expression level of wild-type lacZ. We conclude that context-induced polarity will exist in genes wherever low and reproducible gene product levels have been selected.

Context specific misreading of phenylalanine codons

It has previously been shown that the phenylalanine codon UUC encoding residue 8 of the Escherichia coli argI gene product, ornithine transcarbamylase, is misread as leucine at a high frequency during phenylalanine starvation. However, no misreading of the UUU encoding residue 3 was observed under these conditions. Using oligonucleotide-directed, site-specific mutagenesis, we have constructed mutants where these codons have been changed. Using these mutant argI genes we see a high level of mistranslation at position 8 during phenylalanine starvation whether the codon is UUU or UUC. With either codon at position 3 we see no leucine substitution. We also constructed a gene with a leucine codon at position 3. The product of this latter mutated gene is stable and active, indicating that preferential turnover of mistranslated protein is not obscuring an otherwise high rate of misreading. This would seem to indicate that it is the context rather than the particular phenylalanine codon which is important in determining these misreading levels.

Missense and nonsense suppressors can correct frameshift mutations

Missense and nonsense suppressor tRNAs, selected for their ability to read a new triplet codon, were observed to suppress one or more frameshift mutations in trpA of Escherichia coli. Two of the suppressible frameshift mutants, trpA8 and trpA46AspPR3, were cloned, sequenced, and found to be of the +1 type, resulting from the insertion of four nucleotides and one nucleotide, respectively. Twenty-two suppressor tRNAs were examined, 20 derived from one of the 3 glycine isoacceptor species, one from lysT, and one from trpT. The sequences of all but four of the mutant tRNAs are known, and two of those four were converted to suppressor tRNAs that were subsequently sequenced. Consideration of the coding specificities and anticodon sequences of the suppressor tRNAs does not suggest a unitary mechanism of frameshift suppression. Rather, the results indicate that different suppressors may shift frame according to different mechanisms. Examination of the suppression windows of the suppressible frameshift mutations indicates that some of the suppressors may work at cognate codons, either in the 0 frame or in the +1 frame, and others may act at noncognate codons (in either frame) by some as-yet-unspecified mechanism. Whatever the mechanisms, it is clear that some +1 frameshifting can occur at non-monotonous sequences. A striking example of a frameshifting missense suppressor is a mutant lysine tRNA that differs from wild-type lysine tRNA by only a single base in the amino acid acceptor stem, a C to U70 transition that results in a G.U base pair. It is suggested that when this mutant lysine tRNA reads its cognate codon, AAA, the presence of the G.U base pair sometimes leads either to a conformational change in the tRNA or to an altered interaction with some component of the translation machinery involved in translocation, resulting in a shift of reading frame. In general, the results indicate that translocation is not simply a function of anticodon loop size, that different frameshifting mechanisms may operate with different tRNAs, and that conformational features, some far removed from the anticodon region, are involved in maintaining fidelity in translocation.

The paromomycin resistance mutation (parr-454) in the 15 S rRNA gene of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is involved in ribosomal frameshifting

The leaky expression of the yeast mitochondrial gene oxi1, containing a framshift mutation (+1), is caused by natural frameshift suppression, as shown previously (Fox and Weiss-Brummer 1980). A drastic decrease in the natural level of frameshifting is found in the presence of the parr-454 mutation, localized at the 3' end of the 15 S rRNA gene. This mutation causes resistance to the antibiotic paromomycin in the yeast strains D273-10B and KL14-4A (Li et al. 1982; Tabak et al. 1982). The results of this study imply that in the yeast strain 777-3A this mutation alone is sufficient for restriction of the level of natural frameshifting but is insufficient to confer resistance to paromomycin. A second mutation, arising spontaneously with a frequency of 10(-4) leads, in combination with the parr-454 mutation, to full paromomycin resistance in strain 777-3A.

Induced frameshifting mechanism of replication for an information-carrying scrapie prion

A specific mistranslation mechanism for the replication of an infectious protein is described. The feedback mechanism requires the infectious agent to induce concerted frameshifts during the translation of a cellular gene. Each module of the tandem repeat region of the gene encoding the prion protein (PrP) associated with scrapie infectivity contains multiple sites of potential ribosomal frameshifting. It is proposed that some aberrant variants of PrP containing frameshifted peptides within the octapeptide repeat region of the protein backbone are able to replicate and cause scrapie by interfering with the translation and simultaneous translocation of nascent PrP molecules into the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum. The model provides a plausible explanation for the behaviour of host-adapted scrapie strains as well as the aetiology of scrapie-like diseases. The hypothesis that a mistranslated PrP is the scrapie agent can also explain discrepancies between the published amino acid sequence of PrP and the sequence deduced from the gene.

A mitochondrial frameshift suppressor maps in the tRNASer-var1 region of the mitochondrial genome of the yeast S. cerevisiae

A polypeptide chain-terminating mutation (M5631) previously has been shown to be a +1T insertion in the yeast mitochondrial gene oxi1, coding for subunit II of the cytochrome c oxidase. A spontaneously arisen frameshift suppressor (mfs-1) that is mitochondrially inherited suppresses this mutation to a considerable extent. The suppressor mutation was mapped by genetic and molecular analyses in the mitochondrial tRNASer-var1 region of the mitochondrial genome of the yeast S. cerevisiae. Genetic analyses show that the suppressor mfs-1 does not suppress other known mitochondrial frameshift mutations, or missense and nonsense mutations.

Translation of the sequence AGG-AGG yields 50% ribosomal frameshift

We have inserted the sequence 5'-AAG-GAGGU-3', which is complementary to the 3' terminus of Escherichia coli 16S rRNA, in a reading frame and analyzed its effect on the accuracy and overall rate of translation in vivo. Translation over the sequence yields a 50% ribosomal frameshift if the reading phase is A-AGG-AGG-U. The other two possible frames do not give shifts. The introduction of a UAA stop codon before (UAA-AGG-AGG-U) but not after (A-AGG-AGG-UAA) the AGG codons abolishes the frameshift. The change in the reading phase occurs exclusively to the +1 direction. Efficient frameshifting is also induced by the sequence A-AGA-AGA-U. The arginine codons AGG and AGA are read by minor tRNA. Suppression of frameshifting takes place when a gene for minor tRNA(Arg) is introduced on a multicopy plasmid. We suggest that frameshifting during translation of the A-AGG-AGG-U sequence is due to the erroneous decoding of the tandem AGG codons and arises by depletion of tRNA(Arg). The complementarity of tandem AGG codons to the 3' terminus of 16S rRNA is a coincidence and apparently not related to the shift. Replacing the AGG-AGG sequence by the optimal arginine codons CGU-CGU does not increase the overall rate of translation.

On the mechanism of ribosomal frameshifting at hungry codons

In a few, rather rare cases, frameshift mutant alleles are phenotypically suppressed during limitation for particular aminoacyl-tRNA species. The simplest interpretation is compensatory ribosome frameshifting at a "hungry" codon in the vicinity of the suppressed frameshift mutation. We have now tested this interpretation directly by obtaining amino acid sequence data on such a phenotypically suppressed protein. We used a plasmid-borne lacZ gene, engineered to be in the (+) reading frame. Its background leakiness is increased by two orders of magnitude during lysyl-tRNA limitation. The enzyme made under this condition has the amino acid sequence expected from the DNA sequence up to the first lysine codon, then shifts in the (-) direction to recreate the correct lacZ reading frame. The lysine is replaced by serine, presumably due to cognate reading of an overlapping AGC codon displaced by one base to the 3' side of the AAG codon. When the 3' overlapping codon is AGA or AGG, there is no ribosome frameshifting; when it is AGU (read by the same serine tRNA) there is frameshifting, although less efficiently than in the case of AGC. The mechanism of cognate overlapping reading contradicts more elaborate models that two of the authors have suggested previously. However, the possibility remains that there is more than one mechanism of ribosome frameshifting at hungry codons.

SUF12 suppressor protein of yeast. A fusion protein related to the EF-1 family of elongation factors

Mutations at the suf12 locus were isolated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as extragenic suppressors of +1 frameshift mutations in glycine (GGX) and proline (CCX) codons, as well as UGA and UAG nonsense mutations. To identify the SUF12 function in translation and to understand the relationship between suf12-mediated misreading and translational frameshifting, we have isolated an SUF12+ clone from a centromeric plasmid library by complementation. SUF12+ is an essential, single-copy gene that is identical with the omnipotent suppressor gene SUP35+. The 2.3 x 10(3) base SUF12+ transcript contains an open reading frame sufficient to encode a 88 x 10(3) Mr protein. The pattern of codon usage and transcript abundance suggests that SUF12+ is not a highly expressed gene. The linear SUF12 amino acid sequence suggests that SUF12 has evolved as a fusion protein of unique N-terminal domains fused to domains that exhibit essentially co-linear homology to the EF-1 family of elongation factors. Beginning internally at amino acid 254, homology is more extensive between the SUF12 protein and EF-1 alpha of yeast (36% identity; 65% with conservative substitutions) than between EF-1 alpha of yeast and EF-Tu of Escherichia coli. The most extensive regions of SUF12/EF-1 alpha homology are those regions that have been conserved in the EF-1 family, including domains involved in GTP and tRNA binding. It is clear that SUF12 and EF-1 alpha are not functionally equivalent, since both are essential in vivo. The N-terminal domains of SUF12 are unique and may reflect, in part, the functional distinction between these proteins. These domains exhibit unusual amino acid composition and extensive repeated structure. The behavior of suf12-null/SUF12+ heterozygotes indicates that suf12 is co-dominantly expressed and suggests that suf12 allele-specific suppression may result from functionally distinct mutant proteins rather than variation in residual wild-type SUF12+ activity. We propose a model of suf12-mediated frameshift and nonsense suppression that is based on a primary defect in the normal process of codon recognition.

Reading frame selection and transfer RNA anticodon loop stacking

Messenger RNA's are translated in successive three-nucleotide steps (a reading frame), therefore decoding must proceed in only one of three possible frames. A molecular model for correct propagation of the frame is presented based on (i) the measured translational properties of transfer RNA's (tRNA's) that contain an extra nucleotide in the anticodon loop and (ii) a straightforward concept about anticodon loop structure. The model explains the high accuracy of reading frame maintenance by normal tRNA's, as well as activities of all characterized frameshift suppressor tRNA's that have altered anticodon loops.

Mistranslation in twelve Escherichia coli ribosomal proteins. Cysteine misincorporation at neutral amino acid residues other than tryptophan

The misincorporation of cysteine (codon: UGU/C) into twelve ribosomal proteins devoid of cysteine has been studied. Although it is generally assumed that cysteine is misincorporated at arginine and tryptophan residues (codons: CGU/U and UGG respectively), our results are consistent with the idea that cysteine is also misincorporated at phenylalanine residues (codon: UUU/C) through a second-position C:U mismatch. Cysteine was found in ribosomal proteins L29, L32/L33 and S10, under conditions where only its misincorporation at neutral residues was measured. Since these proteins contain no tryptophan, the date imply that cysteine has replaced a neutral amino acid other than tryptophan. Because there was a statistically significant correlation between the total level of cysteine in the twelve proteins under study and their content of phenylalanine and arginine residues, we conclude that there is a likelihood of cysteine misincorporation at phenylalanine residues, in addition to its misincorporation at arginine and tryptophan residues. Our measurements are consistent with the existence of a cluster of ribosomal proteins having an average mistranslation frequency of 2.5 X 10(-4)/residue and another having an average mistranslation frequency of 10(-3)/residue. There was three times less cysteine misincorporated into ribosomal protein L1 than into L7/L12, although the L1 mRNA contains eleven CGU/C codons and four UUU/C codons while the L7/L12 mRNA contains only one arginine and two phenylalanine codons (both proteins are free of tryptophan). Furthermore, the mRNAs for both L1 and L7/L12 contain a CGU codon located in the context GUA-codon-GG and there was as much cysteine incorporated at this codon in L7/L12 [Bouadloun, F., Donner, D. and Kurland, C.G. (1983) EMBO J. 2, 1351-1356] than in the whole of L1. This suggests that, relatively speaking, little cysteine is to be found at the phenylalanine and the other ten arginine positions of L1 and that the phenylalanine residues of L7/L12 are particularly error-prone.

The function, structure and regulation of E. coli peptide chain release factors

The termination of protein synthesis in Escherichia coli depends upon the soluble protein factors RF1 or RF2. RF1 catalyzes UAG and UAA dependent termination, while RF2 catalyzes UGA and UAA dependent termination. The proteins have been purified to homogeneity, their respective genes isolated, and their primary structures deduced from the DNA sequences. The sequences reveal considerable conserved homology, presumably reflecting functional similarities and a common ancestral origin. The RFs are encoded as single copy genes on the bacterial chromosome. RF2 exhibits autogenous regulation in an in vitro translation system. The mechanism of autoregulation appears to be an in-frame UGA stop codon that requires a 1+ frameshift for the continued synthesis of the protein. Frameshifting prior to the inframe stop codon occurs at a remarkably high frequency by an unknown mechanism. Future studies will be directed at understanding how RFs interact with the ribosomal components, and further defining the mechanism of RF2 frameshifting.

Frameshift suppression by thyA mutants of Escherichia coli K-12

We have extended our previous study on the suppression of frameshift mutants by Escherichia coli thyA mutants by assaying suppression of 15 rIIB frameshift mutants of bacteriophage T4 on one of our suppressing thyA mutant strains. The majority of insertion mutants were suppressible, whereas none of the deletion mutants tested was suppressible. Frameshift suppression could be inhibited by adding thymidine to the assay medium, but was not affected by the presence of a restrictive rpsL mutation in the host strain. We suggest that the frameshift suppression event occurs at a nonsense codon generated by the frameshift mutation.

Base substitutions in the tRNA anticodon arm do not degrade the accuracy of reading frame maintenance

We have examined the activities of a set of 34 site-directed mutants of tRNA Su7 for their ability to shift reading frame during translation of amber codons in vivo. The set includes variants at every position in the distal three base pairs of the anticodon stem and saturates the anticodon loop, with the exception of the anticodon itself. Most anticodon-stem mutations were made pairwise to preserve the secondary structure of that region. Variants of the Hirsh (A24) coding alteration were also tested. The mutations have varied and often dramatic effects on the ability of Su7 to act in translation, which indicates that they cause distortions of the codon-anticodon complex. However, none of the tested mutations affects the intrinsic accuracy of translocation, which we show to be very high. These results suggest that translocation must be independent of the conformational detail of the codon-anticodon complex and stand in contrast to frameshifts that occur when tRNAs misread codons. We suggest that when the tRNA is properly paired to the codon, translocation proceeds normally. Thus, we conclude that selection of a cognate tRNA ensures highly accurate reading frame maintenance. As a corollary, inefficient amber suppressors are not inefficient because they frameshift. Instead, they are likely to fail because a release factor translates the amber codon.

Mistranslation during phenylalanine starvation

Starvation for phenylalanine led to leucine misincorporation frequencies of 0.1 and 0.6 at UUC codons in the argI transcript of Escherichia coli, but no detectable misincorporation at a UUU codon. Under similar starvation conditions the relative synthesis of full sized MS2 coat protein, encoded by the RNA virus or a DNA copy, is greatly reduced, preventing analysis of the protein. This reduction in amount is unaffected by a rpsL mutation.

tRNA anticodon replacement experiments show that ribosomal frameshifting can be caused by doublet decoding

The expression of certain normal genes requires a specific ribosomal frameshift event because the mRNA has the coding information for one protein in two different reading frames. One of several possible mechanisms for this involves recognition of a nontriplet codon by a noncognate tRNA. The AGUC-decoding Escherichia coli tRNASer3 reads a GCA alanine codon to cause a -1 frameshift. Replacement of the anticodon of tRNAPhe with the anticodon of tRNASer3 allows the constructed tRNA to cause this frameshifting. By altering the anticodon loop nucleotides at positions 33-36 in the constructed tRNAPhe molecules, the tRNA was found to recognize a 2-base codon. Instead of the usual anticodon, positions 34-36, the nucleotides in positions 34 and 35 form essential base pairs with the first two positions of the alanine codon. The uridine in position 36 is also required but not for base pairing.