Adherence and efficacy of screening for low bone mineral density among ulcerative colitis patients treated with corticosteroids

Is the European Crohn's and Colitis organisation (ECCO) e-guide an acceptable and feasible tool for increasing gastroenterologists' guideline adherence? A mixed methods evaluation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Management of inflammatory bowel disease is constantly evolving, increasing the importance for gastroenterologists to keep up to date with guidelines. Traditional implementation strategies have had only small positive impacts on clinical practice. eHealth strategies such as the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation e-guide may be beneficial for clinician decision making in keeping with guidelines. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the e-guide.

METHODS

A mixed methods approach was used to evaluate feasibility and acceptability. Cognitive (think-aloud) interviews were conducted with Australian gastroenterologists while using the e-guide. Two clinical scenarios were developed to allow evaluation of various aspects of the e-guide. Content analysis was applied to the qualitative interview data and descriptive analysis to the quantitative and observational data.

RESULTS

Seventeen participants completed the study. Data saturation were reached. The ECCO e-guide was largely feasible and acceptable, as demonstrated by most clinical questions answered correctly, 87% reaching the answer within 3 min, and most feeling it was useful, would be beneficial to their practice and would use it again. Issues raised included difficulties with website navigation, layout of the e-guide and difficulties with access (network firewalls, paid subscription required).

CONCLUSIONS

The ECCO e-guide is largely acceptable and feasible for gastroenterologists to use. Aspects of the e-guide could be modified to improve user experience. This study highlights the importance of engaging end-users in the development and evaluation of clinician educational tools.

Survey of barriers to adherence to international inflammatory bowel disease guidelines: Does gastroenterologists' confidence translate to high adherence?

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Despite the availability of evidence-based inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) guidelines, suboptimal care persists. There is little published research assessing barriers to IBD guideline adherence. This study aimed to identify barriers to IBD guideline adherence including gastroenterologists' knowledge and attitudes towards guidelines.

METHODS

An online cross-sectional survey of 824 Australian gastroenterologists was conducted from April to August 2018, with 198 (24%) responses. A novel survey was developed which was informed by the theoretical domain's framework.

RESULTS

Confidence in guideline recommendations was high, however referral to them was low. The European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) guidelines were the most commonly referred to (43.6%). In multivariate analysis, significant predictors of frequent versus infrequent guideline referral were: high confidence in the guideline (OR 7.70, 95% CI: 2.43-24.39, p = 0.001), and low (≤10 years) clinical experience (OR 3.62, 95% CI: 1.11-11.79, p = 0.03). The most common barriers to guideline adherence were not having time (62%) followed by guideline specifics being difficult to remember (61%). Low confidence was reported in managing pregnancy and IBD (34%) and loss of response to therapy (29%). High confidence was reported in managing immunomodulators, however only 43% answered the associated knowledge question correctly.

CONCLUSION

Although gastroenterologists' have high confidence in guidelines, they use them infrequently, primarily due to specifics being difficult to remember and lack of time. Self-reported confidence in an area of IBD management does not always reflect knowledge. An intervention targeting these barriers, for example computer-based clinical decision support tools, may improve adherence and standardise care. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

An Evidence Map of the Women Veterans' Health Research Literature (2008-2015)

BACKGROUND

Women comprise a growing proportion of Veterans seeking care at Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare facilities. VA initiatives have accelerated changes in services for female Veterans, yet the corresponding literature has not been systematically reviewed since 2008. In 2015, VA Women's Health Services and the VA Women's Health Research Network requested an updated literature review to facilitate policy and research planning.

METHODS

The Minneapolis VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program performed a systematic search of research related to female Veterans' health published from 2008 through 2015. We extracted study characteristics including healthcare topic, design, sample size and proportion female, research setting, and funding source. We created an evidence map by organizing and presenting results within and across healthcare topics, and describing patterns, strengths, and gaps.

RESULTS

We identified 2276 abstracts and assessed each for relevance. We excluded 1092 abstracts and reviewed 1184 full-text articles; 750 were excluded. Of 440 included articles, 208 (47%) were related to mental health, particularly post-traumatic stress disorder (71 articles), military sexual trauma (37 articles), and substance abuse (20 articles). The number of articles addressing VA priority topic areas increased over time, including reproductive health, healthcare organization and delivery, access and utilization, and post-deployment health. Three or fewer articles addressed each of the common chronic diseases: diabetes, hypertension, depression, or anxiety. Nearly 400 articles (90%) used an observational design. Eight articles (2%) described randomized trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Our evidence map summarizes patterns, progress, and growth in the female Veterans' health and healthcare literature. Observational studies in mental health make up the majority of research. A focus on primary care delivery over clinical topics in primary care and a lack of sex-specific results for studies that include men and women have contributed to research gaps in addressing common chronic diseases. Interventional research using randomized trials is needed.

Assessment of corticosteroid-related quality of care measures for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in the United States: a claims data analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate corticosteroid (CS)-related quality of care indicators in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) in the US.

METHODS

Adults diagnosed with UC or CD and prescription fills for an oral CS were identified from a large commercial US claims database (2005-2013). Quality indicators included prolonged CS use (≥60 days), use of CS-sparing therapy, and bone loss assessment. State-level variations in quality of care indicators were estimated using logistic regression models adjusting for age, gender, insurance plan type, and CD severity.

RESULTS

Of the 25,063 UC and 22,155 CD patients receiving CS, 16.1% and 12.6%, respectively, were prolonged CS users. Among prolonged CS users, 52.5% of UC and 68.2% of CD patients used CS-sparing therapy. Bone loss assessment was observed in 11.0% of UC patients with prolonged CS use and 7.7% of newly diagnosed CD patients. Prolonged CS use was the lowest in Kentucky (odds ratio [OR] = 0.59) and the highest in Wisconsin (OR = 1.41) for UC patients; the lowest in North Carolina and New York (both OR = 0.71) and the highest in Utah (OR = 2.42) for CD patients. CS-sparing therapy use was the lowest in Delaware (OR = 0.42) and the highest in Michigan (OR = 0.83) for UC patients; it was significantly different only in South Carolina (OR = 0.57) for CD patients. Bone loss assessment rates were the highest in Arizona (OR = 1.83) for UC patients and were the lowest in Mississippi (OR = 0.52) and the highest in Texas (OR = 1.51) for CD patients.

LIMITATIONS

Information on disease severity was not available in the database.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant regional variations in all three quality indicators were observed across the US.

An Assessment of the AGA and CCFA Quality Indicators in a Sample of Patients Diagnosed with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic relapsing disease characterized by activation of the mucosal immune system and inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. Management of IBD places a significant burden on the health care system because of the complexity of treatment, variability in patient outcomes, and chronic nature of the disease. 

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) and Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America's (CCFA) quality measurement sets in a sample of IBD patients.

METHODS

Fourteen quality measures were restated for application to a claims database and calculated using Optum Clinformatics DataMart database. Selected measures were calculated over calendar year 2011.

RESULTS

Performance measures ranged from 0.4% for AGA measure 9, prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism, to 66.9% for AGA measure 8, testing for Clostridium difficile. CCFA outcome measures ranged from 0.6% qualifying for CCFA O10, report of fecal incontinence, to 32.9% for CCFA O1, prednisone usage. In addition to Clostridium difficile testing, the use of appropriate corticosteroid-sparing therapy (51.1%) and testing for latent tuberculosis before initiating anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy (45.0%) were the highest achieved measures.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first examination of IBD quality measures using administrative claims. Rates of achievement across measures were variable and likely affected by the ability to calculate certain measures with claims data. Future studies should further examine measurement of IBD quality indicators in claims data to assess the validity of claims-based analyses and to ascertain whether measure attainment translates into better overall health or IBD-related outcomes.