1
|
Zeng F, Zhang DY, Chen SJ, Chen RX, Chen C, Huang SM, Li D, Zhang XD, Chen JJ, Mo CY, Gao L, Zeng JT, Xiong JX, Chen Z, Bai FH. Application of fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: A community-based, cross-sectional study in average-risk individuals in Hainan. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:3445-3456. [PMID: 39171167 PMCID: PMC11334025 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i8.3445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 05/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in China is steadily rising, with a high proportion of advanced-stage diagnoses. This highlights the significance of early detection and prevention measures to enhance survival rates. Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is a globally recommended CRC screening method; however, limited research has been conducted on its application in Hainan. AIM To assess the efficacy and adherence of FIT screening among average-risk individuals in Hainan, while also examining the risk factors associated with positive FIT results. METHODS This population-based cross-sectional study implemented FIT screening for CRC in 2000 asymptomatic participants aged 40-75 years from five cities and 21 community health centers in Hainan Province. The study was conducted from August 2022 to April 2023, employing a stratified sampling method to select participants. Individuals with positive FIT results subsequently underwent colonoscopy. Positive predictive values for confirmed CRC and advanced adenoma were calculated, and the relationship between relevant variables and positive FIT results was analyzed using χ 2 tests and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 1788 participants completed the FIT screening, with a median age of 57 years (interquartile range: 40-75). Among them, 503 (28.1%) were males, and 1285 (71.9%) were females, resulting in an 89.4% compliance rate for FIT screening. The overall positivity rate of FIT was 4.4% [79 out of 1788; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3%-5%]. The specific positivity rates for Haikou, Sanya, Orient City, Qionghai City, and Wuzhishan City were 9.6% (45 of 468; 95%CI: 8%-11%), 1.3% (6 of 445; 95%CI: 0.1%-3.1%), 2.7% (8 of 293; 95%CI: 1.2%-4.3%), 3.3% (9 of 276; 95%CI: 1.0%-6.3%), and 4.2% (11 of 406; 95%CI: 1.2%-7.3%), respectively. Significant associations were found between age, dietary habits, and positive FIT results. Out of the 79 participants with positive FIT results, 55 underwent colonoscopy, demonstrating an 82.2% compliance rate. Among them, 10 had a clean gastrointestinal tract, 43 had polyps or adenomas, and 2 were confirmed to have CRC, yielding a positive predictive value of 3.6% (95%CI: 0.9%-4.2%). Among the 43 participants with polyps or adenomas, 8 were diagnosed with advanced adenomas, resulting in an advanced adenoma rate of 14.5% (95%CI: 10.1%-17.7%). CONCLUSION In the Hainan region, FIT screening for CRC among asymptomatic individuals at average risk is feasible and well-received.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan Zeng
- Graduate School, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 571199, Hainan Province, China
| | - Da-Ya Zhang
- Graduate School, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 571199, Hainan Province, China
| | - Shi-Ju Chen
- Graduate School, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 571199, Hainan Province, China
| | - Run-Xiang Chen
- Graduate School, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 571199, Hainan Province, China
| | - Chen Chen
- Graduate School, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 571199, Hainan Province, China
| | - Shi-Mei Huang
- Graduate School, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 571199, Hainan Province, China
| | - Da Li
- Graduate School, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 571199, Hainan Province, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Zhang
- Graduate School, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 571199, Hainan Province, China
| | - Jia-Jia Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qionghai People’s Hospital, Qionghai 571400, Hainan Province, China
| | - Cui-Yi Mo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qionghai People’s Hospital, Qionghai 571400, Hainan Province, China
| | - Lei Gao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sanya Central Hospital, Sanya 572022, Hainan Province, China
| | - Jun-Tao Zeng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sanya Central Hospital, Sanya 572022, Hainan Province, China
| | - Jian-Xin Xiong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hainan Second People’s Hospital, Wuzhishang 572299, Hainan Province, China
| | - Zhai Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dongfang People’s Hospital, Dongfang 572699, Hainan Province, China
| | - Fei-Hu Bai
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570216, Hainan Province, China
- The Gastroenterology Clinical Medical Center of Hainan Province, Haikou 570216, Hainan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
May FP, Brodney S, Tuan JJ, Syngal S, Chan AT, Glenn B, Johnson G, Chang Y, Drew DA, Moy B, Rodriguez NJ, Warner ET, Anyane-Yeboa A, Ukaegbu C, Davis AQ, Schoolcraft K, Regan S, Yoguez N, Kuney S, Le Beaux K, Jeffries C, Lee ET, Bhat R, Haas JS. Community collaboration to advance racial/ethnic equity in colorectal Cancer screening: Protocol for a multilevel intervention to improve screening and follow-up in community Health centers. Contemp Clin Trials 2024; 145:107639. [PMID: 39068985 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening utilization is low among low-income, uninsured, and minority populations that receive care in community health centers (CHCs). There is a need for evidence-based interventions to increase screening and follow-up care in these settings. METHODS A multilevel, multi-component pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial is being conducted at 8 CHCs in two metropolitan areas (Boston and Los Angeles), with two arms: (1) Mailed FIT outreach with text reminders, and (2) Mailed FIT-DNA with patient support. We also include an additional CHC in Rapid City (South Dakota) that follows a parallel protocol for FIT-DNA but is not randomized due to lack of a comparison group. Eligible individuals in participating clinics are primary care patients ages 45-75, at average-risk for CRC, and overdue for CRC screening. Participants with abnormal screening results are offered navigation for follow-up colonoscopy and CRC risk assessment. RESULTS The primary outcome is the completion rate of CRC screening at 90 days. Secondary outcomes include the screening completion rate at 180 days and the rate of colonoscopy completion within 6 months among participants with an abnormal result. Additional goals are to enhance our understanding of facilitators and barriers to CRC risk assessment in CHC settings. CONCLUSIONS This study assesses the effectiveness of two multilevel interventions to increase screening participation and follow-up after abnormal screening in under-resourced clinical settings, informing future efforts to address CRC disparities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05714644.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Folasade P May
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center, University of California Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 650 S. Charles E Young Drive, Center for Health Sciences, Suite A2-125, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6900, USA; Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA; UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, 650 S. Charles E Young Drive, Center for Health Sciences, Suite A2-125, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6900, USA
| | - Suzanne Brodney
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jessica J Tuan
- UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, 650 S. Charles E Young Drive, Center for Health Sciences, Suite A2-125, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6900, USA
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Population Sciences and Cancer Genetics and Prevention Divisions, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew T Chan
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Beth Glenn
- UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, 650 S. Charles E Young Drive, Center for Health Sciences, Suite A2-125, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6900, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, United States of America; UCLA Center for Cancer Prevention and Control Research, UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6900, USA
| | - Gina Johnson
- Community Health Prevention Programs, Great Plains Tribal Leaders Health Board, Rapid City, SD, USA
| | - Yuchiao Chang
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David A Drew
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Beverly Moy
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicolette J Rodriguez
- Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erica T Warner
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adjoa Anyane-Yeboa
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chinedu Ukaegbu
- Population Sciences and Cancer Genetics and Prevention Divisions, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anjelica Q Davis
- Fight Colorectal Cancer, 134 Park Central Sq. Ste 210, Springfield, MO 65806, USA
| | - Kimberly Schoolcraft
- Fight Colorectal Cancer, 134 Park Central Sq. Ste 210, Springfield, MO 65806, USA
| | - Susan Regan
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nathan Yoguez
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Samantha Kuney
- Population Sciences and Cancer Genetics and Prevention Divisions, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kelley Le Beaux
- Community Health Prevention Programs, Great Plains Tribal Leaders Health Board, Rapid City, SD, USA
| | - Catherine Jeffries
- Community Health Prevention Programs, Great Plains Tribal Leaders Health Board, Rapid City, SD, USA
| | - Ellen T Lee
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Roopa Bhat
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer S Haas
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Blake SN, Kortlever TL, Verbrugge SE, van Vuuren AJ, Dekker E, van der Vlugt M, Hugtenburg JG. Stable hemoglobin concentration with fecal immunochemical test at high temperatures in a Caribbean colorectal cancer screening program. Clin Chim Acta 2024; 560:119723. [PMID: 38735515 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2024.119723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS High temperatures may reduce fecal immunochemical test (FIT) positivity and colorectal cancer (CRC) detection sensitivity. We investigated the effect of temperature on hemoglobin concentration [Hb], in the FOB Gold®. Additionally, we examined FIT pick-up, storage, return times and specimen collection. MATERIALS AND METHODS In vitro experiments with buffer containing FIT devices, inoculated with Hb-spiked stool. For 7 days, 144 samples were stored in groups of 36 at 4 °C, 22 °C, 30 °C, and 50 °C. Additionally, 54 samples were stored in groups of 18 at 34 °C, 42 °C and 50 °C for 20 h. Paired t-tests and repeated measure ANOVA assessed [Hb] change. Sixty-five screening participants completed a FIT-handling questionnaire. RESULTS After 7 days, mean [Hb] was stable at 30 °C (0.8 µg Hb/g;95 %CI: -1.5 to 3.1;p = 0.50). For 50 °C, mean [Hb] decreased within 2 days (-21.3 µg Hb/g;95 %CI: -30.2 to -12.5;p < 0.001) and after 20 h (-63.0 µg Hb/g;95 %CI: -88.7 to -37.3;p < 0.001), respectively. All other temperature categories showed significant mean [Hb] increase. Same-day FIT return was reported by 80 %. Eighty-seven percent experienced specimen collection as easy and 33 % kept the FIT refrigerated after collection. CONCLUSIONS The FOB Gold® is suitable for CRC screening in tropical climates. Although most respondents indicated same-day sample return, we recommend avoiding FIT storage above 30 °C for longer than7 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shacara N Blake
- Caribbean Prevention Center - Fundashon Prevenshon, Willemstad, Curaçao; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism (AGEM), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tim L Kortlever
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism (AGEM), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sue Ellen Verbrugge
- Analytisch Diagnostisch Centrum NV, Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Willemstad, Curaçao
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism (AGEM), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon van der Vlugt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism (AGEM), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline G Hugtenburg
- Caribbean Prevention Center - Fundashon Prevenshon, Willemstad, Curaçao; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; University of Curaçao, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Willemstad, Curaçao.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Savino A, Rondonotti E, Rocchetto S, Piagnani A, Bina N, Di Domenico P, Segatta F, Radaelli F. GI genius endoscopy module: a clinical profile. Expert Rev Med Devices 2024; 21:359-372. [PMID: 38618982 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2342508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The identification of early-stage colorectal cancers (CRC) and the resection of pre-cancerous neoplastic lesions through colonoscopy allows to decrease both CRC incidence and mortality. However, colonoscopy miss rates up to 26% for adenomas and 9% for advanced adenomas have been reported. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) systems have been emerging as easy-to-use tools, potentially lowering the risk of missing lesions. AREAS COVERED This review paper focuses on GI Genius device (Medtronic Co. Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A.) a computer-assisted tool designed to assist endoscopists during standard white-light colonoscopies in detecting mucosal lesions. EXPERT OPINION Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest that GI Genius is a safe and effective tool for improving adenoma detection, especially in CRC screening and surveillance colonoscopies. However, its impact seems to be less significant among experienced endoscopists and in real-world clinical scenarios compared to the controlled conditions of RCTs. Furthermore, it appears that GI Genius mainly enhances the detection of non-advanced, small polyps, but does not significantly impact the identification of advanced and difficult-to-detect adenoma. When using GI Genius, no complications were documented. Only a small number of studies reported an increased in withdrawal time or the removal of non-neoplastic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Savino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Simone Rocchetto
- Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy
- Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Piagnani
- Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy
- Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Niccolò Bina
- Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy
| | - Pasquale Di Domenico
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery & Dentistry Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Francesco Segatta
- Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy
- Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Toth JF, Trivedi M, Gupta S. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: The Role of Clinical Laboratories. Clin Chem 2024; 70:150-164. [PMID: 38175599 PMCID: PMC10952004 DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer incidence and mortality. Screening can result in reductions in incidence and mortality, but there are many challenges to uptake and follow-up. CONTENT Here, we will review the changing epidemiology of CRC, including increasing trends for early and later onset CRC; evidence to support current and emerging screening strategies, including noninvasive stool and blood-based tests; key challenges to ensuring uptake and high-quality screening; and the critical role that clinical laboratories can have in supporting health system and public health efforts to reduce the burden of CRC on the population. SUMMARY Clinical laboratories have the opportunity to play a seminal role in optimizing early detection and prevention of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph F Toth
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Mehul Trivedi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Samir Gupta
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, United States
- Department of Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yu M, Yang C, Wang S, Shi Y, Wang J, Meng C, Xue L, Chen Z. Plasma Methylated SEPT9 as a Novel Biomarker for Predicting Liver Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer. Mol Biotechnol 2023:10.1007/s12033-023-00855-3. [PMID: 37608077 DOI: 10.1007/s12033-023-00855-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the role of plasma methylated SEPT9 (mSEPT9) in predicting liver metastasis (LM) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. The clinicopathological information of 115 consecutive CRC patients were collected. The differences of clinical characteristics and several biomarkers between CRC patients with LM and those with non-liver metastasis (NM) were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for predicting LM in CRC patients. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was applied to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of potential biomarkers in indicating the presence of LM in CRC. Compared with the CRC without LM, the levels of plasma mSEPT9 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were significantly increased in CRC with LM. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that plasma mSEPT9 was an independent risk factor for predicting LM in CRC. ROC curves showed that mSEPT9 and CEA could efficiently distinguish LM from NM in CRC. The area under the curve (AUC) of mSEPT9 was 0.850, which was slightly higher than that of CEA (0.842). The optimal cut-off value of mSEPT9 was 35.09 with a sensitivity of 81.82% and a specificity of 73.33%, both similar with that of CEA (sensitivity 87.27% and specificity 75.00%). In addition, the combination of mSEPT9 and CEA had a higher specificity than CEA alone (81.70% Vs 75.00%). Our findings suggest, for the first time, that plasma mSEPT9 might serve as a potential biomarker to predict LM in CRC, which deserves further in-depth study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengsi Yu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Changcheng Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Song Wang
- Department of Ophthalmology, General Hospital of Xinjiang Military Region, Urumqi, China
| | - Ying Shi
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Jialu Wang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Cunren Meng
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Li Xue
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Zhaoyun Chen
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhu M, Fan L, Han M, Zhu S, Zhang S, Shi H. The usefulness of fecal hemoglobin and calprotectin tests in diagnosing significant bowel diseases: a prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2023; 58:368-374. [PMID: 36260495 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2133551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Although colonoscopy remains the gold standard for determining bowel diseases, it's invasive and expensive. New non-invasive diagnostic methods are urgently needed as an initial screening modality. We aimed to investigate the value of fecal calprotectin (FC) and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in differentiation of significant and non- significant bowel diseases. METHODS In this prospective study, consecutive individuals were included if they underwent colonoscopy for symptoms of lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract, positive fecal occult blood test, surveillance for IBD or colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Diagnostic value of FC and FIT in discriminating significant bowel diseases (advanced neoplasia, active inflammatory bowel diseases or bowel inflammation due to other causes) and non-significant bowel diseases (normal, asymptomatic diverticulum, non-adenomatous polyp, or non-advanced neoplasia) were evaluated. RESULTS Among 201 individuals included, 107 patients had significant bowel diseases. FC and FIT had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.722 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.653-0.792) and 0.797 (95%CI 0.734-0.860), respectively, for determining significant bowel diseases. Combination of FC and FIT predicted significant bowel diseases with an AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.832 (95% CI 0.775-0.890), 77.6%, 74.5%, and 76.1%, respectively. Moreover, combination of FC and FIT was more sensitive among patients with lower GI symptoms than asymptomatic individuals (80.8% vs. 74.1%) to identify significant bowel diseases. CONCLUSIONS A single measurement of FC or FIT is not sufficiently accurate to identify patients with significant bowel disease. However, combination of FC and FIT can help increase the sensitivity, especially in patients with lower GI symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Liqiaona Fan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Muzhou Han
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Siying Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Shutian Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Haiyun Shi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Carethers JM. Stool-Based Screening Tests for Colorectal Cancer. JAMA 2023; 329:839-840. [PMID: 36800187 PMCID: PMC10386850 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.0547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
A 56-year-old man with no significant medical history has declined screening colonoscopy at previous physician visits but wants to undergo a less invasive test because his father died of colorectal cancer at age 80. What would you do next?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M Carethers
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alatise OI, Dare AJ, Akinyemi PA, Abdulkareem FB, Olatoke SA, Knapp GC, Kingham TP, Alatise OI, Kingham TP, Abdulkareem FB, Olatoke SA, Dare AJ, Akinyemi PA, Knapp GC, Ademakinwa OR, Adeyeye AA, Agodirin OS, Badmus KB, Bojuwoye MO, Bernardo MD, Kahn R, Lawal AO, Odeghe EA, Ogunleye SG, Olasehinde OO, Olagboyega OT, Olcese C, Olokoba AB, Omoyiola T, Orah NO, Osinowo AO, Oyeleke GK, Owoade IA, Randolph K, Tulloch R. Colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical testing: a community-based, cross-sectional study in average-risk individuals in Nigeria. THE LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH 2022; 10:e1012-e1022. [DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00121-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
10
|
Park SB, Cha JM. Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality. Clin Endosc 2022; 55:332-338. [PMID: 35656625 PMCID: PMC9178135 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2022.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Continuous measurement of quality indicators (QIs) should be a routine part of colonoscopy, as a wide variation still exists in the performance and quality levels of colonoscopy in Korea. Among the many QIs of colonoscopy, the adenoma detection rate, average withdrawal time, bowel preparation adequacy, and cecal intubation rate should be monitored in daily clinical practice to improve the quality of the procedure. The adenoma detection rate is the best indicator of the quality of colonoscopy; however, it has many limitations for universal use in daily practice. With the development of natural language processing, the adenoma detection rate is expected to become more effective and useful. It is important that colonoscopists do not strictly and mechanically maintain an average withdrawal time of 6 minutes but instead perform careful colonoscopy to maximally expose the colonic mucosa with a withdrawal time of at least 6 minutes. To achieve adequate bowel preparation, documentation of bowel preparation with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) should be a routine part of colonoscopy. When colonoscopists routinely followed the bowel preparation protocols, ≥85% of outpatient screening colonoscopies had a BBPS score of ≥6. In addition, the cecal intubation rate should be ≥95% of all screening colonoscopies. The first step in improving colonoscopy quality in Korea is to apply these key performance measurements in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Bee Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Myung Cha
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Correspondence: Jae Myung Cha Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 05278, Korea E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bhatti U, Jansson-Knodell C, Saito A, Han A, Krajicek E, Han Y, Imperiale TF, Fayad N. Not FIT for Use: Fecal Immunochemical Testing in the Inpatient and Emergency Settings. Am J Med 2022; 135:76-81. [PMID: 34508698 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is widely used for colorectal cancer screening, its only indication. Its effect on clinical decision-making beyond screening is unknown. We studied the use of FIT in emergency and inpatient settings and its impact on patient care. METHODS Using electronic medical records, we reviewed all non-ambulatory FITs performed from November 2017 to October 2019 at a tertiary care community hospital. We collected data on demographics, indications, gastroenterology consultations, and endoscopic procedures. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the effect of FIT on gastroenterology consultation and endoscopy. RESULTS We identified 550 patients with at least 1 FIT test. Only 3 FITs (0.5%) were performed for colorectal cancer screening. FITs were primarily ordered from the emergency department (45.3%) or inpatient hospital floor (42.2%). Anemia (44.0%), followed by gastrointestinal bleeding (40.9%), were the most common indications. FIT was positive in 253 patients (46.0%), and gastroenterology consultation was obtained for 47.4% (n = 120), compared with 14.5% (n = 43) of the 297 FIT-negative patients (odds ratio 3.28; 95% confidence interval, 2.23-4.82, P < .0001). A potential bleeding source was identified in 80% of patients with reported or witnessed overt gastrointestinal bleeding, a similar proportion (80.7%; P = .92) to patients who were FIT positive with overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Multivariate analysis showed that melena, hematemesis, and a positive FIT were associated with gastroenterology consultation (all P < .05), while only melena (odds ratio 3.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-7.54) was associated with endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS Nearly all emergency department and inpatient FIT use was inappropriate. FIT resulted in more gastroenterology consultation but was not independently associated with inpatient endoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umer Bhatti
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Claire Jansson-Knodell
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Akira Saito
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Andrew Han
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Edward Krajicek
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Yan Han
- Division of Biostatistics & Health Data Science, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis
| | - Thomas F Imperiale
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, Ind; Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Indianapolis, Ind
| | - Nabil Fayad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, Ind.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lee HJ, Han K, Soh H, Koh SJ, Im JP, Kim JS, Park HE, Kim M. Occult Blood in Feces Is Associated with Increased Risk of Psoriasis. Dermatology 2021; 238:571-578. [PMID: 34569483 DOI: 10.1159/000518625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The fecal immunochemistry test (FIT) has been proposed as a surrogate marker of intestinal inflammation. Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that is linked to underlying systemic inflammatory conditions, including inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS We investigated the association between occult blood in feces and the risk of psoriasis using data from the National Health Insurance System. This study was conducted involving 1,395,147 individuals who underwent health examinations from January 2009 to December 2012 and were followed up until the end of 2017. RESULTS The incidence of psoriasis (per 1,000 person-years) was 3.76 versus 4.14 (FIT-negative versus FIT-positive group) during a median follow-up of 6.68 years. In the multivariable-adjusted model, the hazard ratios for psoriasis were 1.03 for one positive FIT result, 1.12 for two positive FIT results, and 1.34 for three positive FIT results compared with negative FIT results. CONCLUSION The risk of psoriasis was significantly increased in patients with positive FIT results compared to the FIT-negative population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Jung Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyungdo Han
- Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Soongsil University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hosim Soh
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong-Joon Koh
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Pil Im
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joo Sung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyo Eun Park
- Department of Dermatology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Miri Kim
- Department of Dermatology, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Significant decrease in interval colorectal cancer incidence after implementing immunochemical testing in a multiple-round guaiac-based screening programme. Br J Cancer 2021; 125:1494-1502. [PMID: 34511603 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01546-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS We aimed to evaluate the effects of switching to faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) on the cumulative 2-year incidence rate of interval cancers, interval cancer rate and test sensitivity within a mature population-based colorectal cancer screening programme consisting of six rounds of biennial guaiac faecal occult blood testing (gFOBT). METHODS The FIT results were compared with those of gFOBT used in each of the previous two rounds. For the three rounds analysed, 279,041 tests were performed by 156,186 individuals. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine interval cancer risk factors (Poisson regression) and to compare the sensitivity of FIT to gFOBT. RESULTS There were 612 cases of screen-detected cancers and 209 cases of interval cancers. The sex- and age-adjusted cumulative 2-year incidence rates of interval cancers were 55.7 (95% CI, 45.3-68.5), 42.4 (95% CI, 32.6-55.2) and 15.8 (95% CI, 10.9-22.8) per 100,000 person-years after the last two rounds of gFOBT and FIT, respectively. The FIT/gFOBT incidence rate ratio was 0.38 [95% CI, 0.27-0.54] (P < 0.001). Sex- and age-adjusted sensitivity was significantly higher with FIT than with gFOBT (OR = 6.70 [95% CI, 4.48-10.01], P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS This population-based study revealed a dramatic decrease in the cumulative incidence rates of interval cancers after switching from gFOBT to FIT. These data provide an additional incentive for countries still using gFOBT to switch to FIT.
Collapse
|
14
|
Ladabaum U, Shepard J, Mannalithara A. Adenoma and Serrated Lesion Detection by Colonoscopy Indication: The ADR-ESS (ADR Extended to all Screening/Surveillance) Score. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:1873-1882. [PMID: 33895358 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The adenoma detection rate at screening (ADR) predicts interval colorectal cancer. Monitoring other lesion detection rates and colonoscopy indications has been proposed. We developed a comprehensive, automated colonoscopy audit program based on standardized clinical documentation, explored detection rates across indications, and developed the Adenoma Detection Rate - Extended to all Screening / Surveillance (ADR-ESS) score. METHODS In a prospective cohort study, we calculated overall and advanced adenoma and sessile serrated lesion (SSL) detection rates among 15,253 colonoscopies by 35 endoscopists from 4 endoscopy units across all colonoscopy indications. We explored correlations between detection rates, and the precision and stability of ADR-ESS versus ADR. RESULTS The overall "screening, first" ADR was 36.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.5%-38.1%). The adenoma detection rate was lower for "screening, not first" (relative rate [RR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.87) and "family history" (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96), and higher for "surveillance" (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15-1.31) and "follow-up, FIT" (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.07-1.37). For "screening, first," the detection rates for advanced adenoma, SSL, and advanced SSL were 6.7% (95% CI, 5.7%-7.7%), 7.2% (95% CI, 6.2%-8.2%), and 2.6% (95% CI, 2.0%-3.2%), respectively. Adenoma and SSL detection were correlated (r = 0.44; P = .008). ADR-ESS had substantially narrower confidence intervals and less period-to-period variability than ADR, and was not improved by weighting for indication volume and correction for detection by indication. CONCLUSIONS Comprehensive, automated colonoscopy audit based on standardized clinical documentation is feasible. Adenoma detection is a fair but imperfect proxy for SSL detection. ADR-ESS increases the precision of adenoma detection assessments and emphasizes quality across colonoscopy indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| | - John Shepard
- Critical Care Quality and Strategic Initiatives, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California
| | - Ajitha Mannalithara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Balamou C, Koïvogui A, Rodrigue CM, Clerc A, Piccotti C, Deloraine A, Exbrayat C. Prediction of the severity of colorectal lesion by fecal hemoglobin concentration observed during previous test in the French screening program. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:5272-5287. [PMID: 34497450 PMCID: PMC8384754 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i31.5272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rate of positive tests using fecal immunochemical test (FIT) does not decrease with subsequent campaigns, but the positive predictive value of advanced neoplasia significantly decreases in subsequent campaign after a first negative test. A relationship between the fecal hemoglobin concentration (Fhb) and the opportunity to detect a colorectal cancer in subsequent campaign has been shown.
AIM To predict the severity of colorectal lesions based on Fhb measured during previous colorectal cancer screening campaign.
METHODS This etiological study included 293750 patients aged 50-74, living in Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes (France). These patients completed at least two FIT [test(-1) and test(0)] between June 2015 and December 2019. Delay between test(-1) and test(0) was > 1 year and test(-1) result was negative (< 150 ngHb/mL). The severity of colorectal lesions diagnosed at test(0) was described according to Fhb measured at test(-1) [Fhb(-1)]. The relationship between the severity classified in seven ordinal categories and the predictive factors was analyzed in an ordered multivariate polytomous regression model.
RESULTS The test(0) positive rate was 4.0%, and the colonoscopy completion rate was 97.1% in 11594 patients who showed a positive test(0). The colonoscopy detection rate was 77.7% in those 11254 patients who underwent a colonoscopy. A total of 8748 colorectal lesions were detected (including 2182 low-risk-polyps, 2400 high-risk-polyp, and 502 colorectal cancer). The colonoscopy detection rate varied significantly with Fhb(-1) [0 ngHb/mL: 75.6%, (0-50 ngHb/mL): 77.3%, (50-100 ngHb/mL): 88.7%, (100-150 ngHb/mL): 90.3%; P = 0.001]. People with a Fhb(-1) within (100-150 ngHb/mL) (P = 0.001) were 2.6 (2.2; 3.0) times more likely to have a high severity level compared to those having a Fhb(-1) value of zero. This risk was reduced by 20% in patients aged 55-59 compared to those aged < 55 [adjusted odds ratio: 0.8 (0.6; 1.0)].
CONCLUSION The study showed that higher Fhb(-1) is correlated to an increased risk of severity of colorectal lesions. This risk of severity increased among first-time participants (age < 55) and the elderly (≥ 70). To avoid the loss of chance in these age groups, the FIT positivity threshold should be reduced to 100 ngHb/mL. The other alternative would be to reduce the time between the two tests in these age groups from the current 2 years to 1 year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Balamou
- Site de l'Ain, Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers en Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, Bourg-en-Bresse 01000, France
| | - Akoï Koïvogui
- Site de Seine-Saint-Denis, Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers en Ile-de-France, Bondy 93146, France
| | - Christelle M Rodrigue
- Site de l'Ain, Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers en Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, Bourg-en-Bresse 01000, France
| | - Aurélie Clerc
- Sites Savoie & Haute Savoie, Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers en Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, Chambéry 73000, France
| | - Claire Piccotti
- Site de Drôme Ardèche, Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers en Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, Valence 26000, France
| | - Anne Deloraine
- Sites Savoie & Haute Savoie, Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers en Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, Chambéry 73000, France
| | - Catherine Exbrayat
- Site Isère & Drôme-Ardèche, Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers en Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, Meylan 38240, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ladabaum U. Doing our best to do no harm. Endoscopy 2021; 53:509-510. [PMID: 33887782 DOI: 10.1055/a-1290-7610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
San Miguel Y, Demb J, Martinez ME, Gupta S, May FP. Time to Colonoscopy After Abnormal Stool-Based Screening and Risk for Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality. Gastroenterology 2021; 160:1997-2005.e3. [PMID: 33545140 PMCID: PMC8096663 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.01.219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The optimal time interval for diagnostic colonoscopy completion after an abnormal stool-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test is uncertain. We examined the association between time to colonoscopy and CRC outcomes among individuals who underwent diagnostic colonoscopy after abnormal stool-based screening. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of veterans age 50 to 75 years with an abnormal fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) between 1999 and 2010. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards to generate CRC-specific incidence and mortality hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for 3-month colonoscopy intervals, with 1 to 3 months as the reference group. Association of time to colonoscopy with late-stage CRC diagnosis was also examined. RESULTS Our cohort included 204,733 patients. Mean age was 61 years (SD 6.9). Compared with patients who received a colonoscopy at 1 to 3 months, there was an increased CRC risk for patients who received a colonoscopy at 13 to 15 months (HR 1.13; 95% CI 1.00-1.27), 16 to 18 months (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.10-1.43), 19 to 21 months (HR 1.28; 95% CI: 1.11-1.48), and 22 to 24 months (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.07-1.47). Compared with patients who received a colonoscopy at 1 to 3 months, mortality risk was higher in groups who received a colonoscopy at 19 to 21 months (HR 1.52; 95% CI 1.51-1.99) and 22 to 24 months (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.03-1.88). Odds for late-stage CRC increased at 16 months. CONCLUSIONS Increased time to colonoscopy is associated with higher risk of CRC incidence, death, and late-stage CRC after abnormal FIT/FOBT. Interventions to improve CRC outcomes should emphasize diagnostic follow-up within 1 year of an abnormal FIT/FOBT result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yazmin San Miguel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California; Moores Cancer Center and Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Joshua Demb
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Maria Elena Martinez
- Moores Cancer Center and Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Samir Gupta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
| | - Folasade P May
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California; Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kim SY, Kim HS, Kim YT, Lee JK, Park HJ, Kim HM, Kang DR. Colonoscopy Versus Fecal Immunochemical Test for Reducing Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Population-Based Case-Control Study. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2021; 12:e00350. [PMID: 33928919 PMCID: PMC8088829 DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Use of colonoscopy or the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention is supported by previous studies. However, there is little specific evidence regarding comparative effectiveness of colonoscopy or FIT for reducing CRC risk. In this study, we compared the association of CRC risk with colonoscopy and FIT using a nationwide database. METHODS This population-based case-control study used colonoscopy and FIT claims data from the Korean National Health Insurance System from 2002 to 2013. Data were analyzed from 61,221 patients with newly diagnosed CRC (case group) and 306,099 individuals without CRC (control group). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between CRC and colonoscopy or FIT. RESULTS Colonoscopy was associated with a reduced subsequent CRC risk (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.29). Stronger associations were found between colonoscopy and distal CRC, compared with proximal CRC (0.24 vs 0.47). In an analysis stratified by sex, the association was weaker in female subjects compared with male subjects (0.33 vs 0.27). Any FIT exposure was associated with CRC risk with an OR of 0.74; this association was stronger for distal cancer. As the frequency of cumulative FIT assessments increased (from 1 to ≥5), the OR of FIT exposure for CRC gradually decreased from 0.81 to 0.45. DISCUSSION The association of colonoscopy or FIT with reduced CRC risk was stronger for distal CRC than for proximal CRC. FIT showed less CRC risk reduction than colonoscopy. However, as the frequency of cumulative FIT assessments increased, the association with CRC prevention became stronger.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Young Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Hyun-Soo Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Yun Tae Kim
- Center of Biomedical Data Science, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Jung Kuk Lee
- Center of Biomedical Data Science, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Hong Jun Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Hee Man Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Dae Ryoung Kang
- Center of Biomedical Data Science, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Randel KR, Schult AL, Botteri E, Hoff G, Bretthauer M, Ursin G, Natvig E, Berstad P, Jørgensen A, Sandvei PK, Olsen ME, Frigstad SO, Darre-Næss O, Norvard ER, Bolstad N, Kørner H, Wibe A, Wensaas KA, de Lange T, Holme Ø. Colorectal Cancer Screening With Repeated Fecal Immunochemical Test Versus Sigmoidoscopy: Baseline Results From a Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology 2021; 160:1085-1096.e5. [PMID: 33227280 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.11.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The comparative effectiveness of sigmoidoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is unknown. METHODS Individuals aged 50-74 years living in Southeast Norway were randomly invited between 2012 and 2019 to either once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy or FIT screening every second year. Colonoscopy was recommended after sigmoidoscopy if any polyp of ≥10 mm, ≥3 adenomas, any advanced adenomas, or CRC was found or, subsequent to, FIT >15 μg hemoglobin/g feces. Data for this report were obtained after complete recruitment in both groups and included 2 full FIT rounds and part of the third round. Outcome measures were participation, neoplasia detection, and adverse events. Age-standardized detection rates and age-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated. RESULTS We included 139,291 individuals: 69,195 randomized to sigmoidoscopy and 70,096 to FIT. The participation rate was 52% for sigmoidoscopy, 58% in the first FIT round, and 68% for 3 cumulative FIT rounds. Compared to sigmoidoscopy, the detection rate for CRC was similar in the first FIT round (0.25% vs 0.27%; OR, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.13) but higher after 3 FIT rounds (0.49% vs 0.27%; OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.54-2.27). Advanced adenoma detection rate was lower in the first FIT round compared to sigmoidoscopy at 1.4% vs 2.4% (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.53-0.62) but higher after 3 cumulative FIT rounds at 2.7% vs 2.4% (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.23). There were 33 (0.05%) serious adverse events in the sigmoidoscopy group compared to 47 (0.07%) in the FIT group (P = .13). CONCLUSIONS Participation was higher and more CRC and advanced adenomas were detected with repeated FIT compared to sigmoidoscopy. The risk of perforation and bleeding was comparable. Clinicaltrials.gov, Number: NCT01538550.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin R Randel
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway; Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Anna L Schult
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo; Norway Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Giske Ursin
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Erik Natvig
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Paula Berstad
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anita Jørgensen
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Marie Ek Olsen
- Department of Pathology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway
| | - Svein Oskar Frigstad
- Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole Darre-Næss
- Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Espen R Norvard
- Department of Pathology, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Drammen, Drammen, Norway
| | - Nils Bolstad
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hartwig Kørner
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital Stavanger, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Arne Wibe
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Department of Surgery, St. Olav's hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Knut-Arne Wensaas
- Research Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway
| | - Thomas de Lange
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Medical Research, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Bærum, Gjettum, Norway; Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo; Department of Medicine, Sorlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Piscitello A, Saoud L, Fendrick AM, Borah BJ, Hassmiller Lich K, Matney M, Ozbay AB, Parton M, Limburg PJ. Estimating the impact of differential adherence on the comparative effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer screening using the CRC-AIM microsimulation model. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0244431. [PMID: 33373409 PMCID: PMC7771985 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-world adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening strategies is imperfect. The CRC-AIM microsimulation model was used to estimate the impact of imperfect adherence on the relative benefits and burdens of guideline-endorsed, stool-based screening strategies. METHODS Predicted outcomes of multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA), fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), and high-sensitivity guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (HSgFOBT) were simulated for 40-year-olds free of diagnosed CRC. For robustness, imperfect adherence was incorporated in multiple ways and with extensive sensitivity analysis. Analysis 1 assumed adherence from 0%-100%, in 10% increments. Analysis 2 longitudinally applied real-world first-round differential adherence rates (base-case imperfect rates = 40% annual FIT vs 34% annual HSgFOBT vs 70% triennial mt-sDNA). Analysis 3 randomly assigned individuals to receive 1, 5, or 9 lifetime (9 = 100% adherence) mt-sDNA tests and 1, 5, or 9 to 26 (26 = 100% adherence) FIT tests. Outcomes are reported per 1000 individuals compared with no screening. RESULTS Each screening strategy decreased CRC incidence and mortality versus no screening. In individuals screened between ages 50-75 and adherence ranging from 10%a-100%, the life-years gained (LYG) for triennial mt-sDNA ranged from 133.1-300.0, for annual FIT from 96.3-318.1, and for annual HSgFOBT from 99.8-320.6. At base-case imperfect adherence rates, mt-sDNA resulted in 19.1% more LYG versus FIT, 25.4% more LYG versus HSgFOBT, and generally had preferable efficiency ratios while offering the most LYG. Completion of at least 21 FIT tests is needed to reach approximately the same LYG achieved with 9 mt-sDNA tests. CONCLUSIONS Adherence assumptions affect the conclusions of CRC screening microsimulations that are used to inform CRC screening guidelines. LYG from FIT and HSgFOBT are more sensitive to changes in adherence assumptions than mt-sDNA because they require more tests be completed for equivalent benefit. At imperfect adherence rates, mt-sDNA provides more LYG than FIT or HSgFOBT at an acceptable tradeoff in screening burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leila Saoud
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | - A. Mark Fendrick
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Bijan J. Borah
- Department of Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Kristen Hassmiller Lich
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Michael Matney
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | - A. Burak Ozbay
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | - Marcus Parton
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | - Paul J. Limburg
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Balzora S, Issaka RB, Anyane-Yeboa A, Gray DM, May FP. Impact of COVID-19 on colorectal cancer disparities and the way forward. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:946-950. [PMID: 32574570 PMCID: PMC7529970 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the U.S. Surgeon General advised all hospitals and ambulatory care centers to delay nonurgent medical procedures and surgeries. This recommendation, echoed by a multigastroenterology society guideline, led to the suspension of colonoscopies for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and surveillance. Although this temporary suspension was necessary to contain COVID-19 infections, we as gastroenterologists, patient advocates, and CRC researchers have witnessed the downstream impact of COVID-19 and this recommendation on CRC screening, research, and advocacy. These effects are particularly noticeable in medically underserved communities where CRC morbidity and mortality are highest. COVID-19-related pauses in medical care, as well as shifts in resource allocation and workforce deployment, threaten decades worth of work to improve CRC disparities in medically underserved populations. In this perspective, we present the unique challenges COVID-19 poses to health equity in CRC prevention and provide potential solutions as we navigate these uncharted waters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Balzora
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
| | - Rachel B Issaka
- Clinical Research Division, Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Adjoa Anyane-Yeboa
- Commonwealth Fund Fellowship in Minority Health Policy at Harvard University, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Darrell M Gray
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Folasade P May
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Guimarães DP, Mantuan LA, de Oliveira MA, Junior RL, Costa AMD, Rossi S, Fava G, Taveira LN, Giardina KM, Talarico T, Costa M, Scapulatempo-Neto C, Matsushita MM, Véo CA, Fregnani JHT, Reis RM, Hawk ET, Mauad EC. The Performance of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Brazil: The First Two Years of the Implementation Program in Barretos Cancer Hospital. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2020; 14:241-252. [PMID: 32998941 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-20-0179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 08/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer in Brazil. Yet, a nationally organized colorectal screening program is not implemented. Barretos Cancer Hospital (BCH) is one of the largest Brazilian institution that cares for underserved patients. BCH developed a fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based organized colorectal cancer screening program to improve colorectal cancer outcomes.This study aims to present the quality/performance measures of the first 2 years of the FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program and its impact on the colorectal cancer disease stage. Between 2015 and 2017, a total of 6,737 individuals attending the Outpatient Department of Prevention or the Mobile Unit of BCH, which visits 18 cities of Barretos county, ages 50 to 65 years, were personally invited by a health agent/nurse practitioner. Exclusion criteria were personal history of colorectal cancer, adenomatous polyps, inflammatory bowel disease, and colonoscopy, or flexible sigmoidoscopy performed in the past 5 years. European Union (EU) guidelines for colorectal cancer screening programs were evaluated. Overall, 92.8% returned the FIT, with an inadequate examination rate of 1.5%. Among the 6,253 adequately tested, 12.5% had a positive result. The colonoscopy compliance and completion rates were 84.6 and 98.2%, respectively. The PPVs were 60.0%, 16.5%, and 5.6% for adenoma, advanced adenoma, and cancer, respectively. Stage distribution of screen-detected cancers shows earlier stages than clinically diagnosed colorectal cancer cancers reported at BCH and Brazilian cancer registries. Our colorectal cancer screening program achieved desirable quality metrics, aligned with the EU guidelines. The observed shift toward earlier colorectal cancer stages suggests an exciting opportunity to improve colorectal cancer-related cancers in Brazil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Peixoto Guimarães
- Department of Endoscopy, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil. .,Department of Prevention, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Silvana Rossi
- Department of Endoscopy, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Gilberto Fava
- Department of Endoscopy, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | | | | | - Thais Talarico
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Maraisa Costa
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | | | | | - Carlos Augusto Véo
- Department of Lower Digestive Surgery, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | | | - Rui Manuel Reis
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.,ICVS/3B's-PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga, Portugal
| | - Ernest T Hawk
- Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Liquid biopsy as a perioperative biomarker of digestive tract cancers: review of the literature. Surg Today 2020; 51:849-861. [PMID: 32979121 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02148-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Tissue biopsies are the gold-standard for investigating the molecular characterization of tumors. However, a "solid" biopsy is an invasive procedure that cannot capture real-time tumor dynamics and may yield inaccurate information because of intratumoral heterogeneity. In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge about surgical treatment-associated "liquid" biopsy for patients with digestive organ tumors. A liquid biopsy is a technique involving the sampling and testing of non-solid biological materials, including blood, urine, saliva, and ascites. Previous studies have reported the potential value of blood-based biomarkers, circulating tumor cells, and cell-free nucleic acids as facilitators of cancer treatment. The applications of a liquid biopsy in a cancer treatment setting include screening and early diagnosis, prognostication, and outcome and recurrence monitoring of cancer. This technique has also been suggested as a useful tool in personalized medicine. The transition to precision medicine is still in its early stages. Soon, however, liquid biopsy is likely to form the basis of patient selection for molecular targeted therapies, predictions regarding chemotherapy sensitivity, and real-time evaluations of therapeutic effects.
Collapse
|
24
|
Mattar R, Marques SB, Minata MK, Silva-Etto JMKD, Sakai P, DE Moura EGH. DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF ONE SAMPLE OR TWO SAMPLES QUANTITATIVE FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TESTS FOR INTESTINAL NEOPLASIA DETECTION. ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2020; 57:316-322. [PMID: 32935747 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.202000000-58] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rectal bleeding is the most important symptom of intestinal neoplasia; thus, tests of occult blood detection in stools are widely used for pre neoplastic lesions and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the accuracy of OC-Sensor quantitative test (Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan) at cut-off 10 µg Hb/g feces (50 ng/mL) in a cohort of subjects that had to undergo diagnostic colonoscopy, and if more than one sample collected in consecutive days would improve the diagnostic accuracy of the test. METHODS Patients (mean age 56.3±9.7 years) that underwent colonoscopy prospectively randomly received one (1-sample FIT, FIT 1) or two (2-sample FIT, FIT 2) collection tubes. They collected the stool sample before starting colonoscopy preparation. Samples were analyzed by the OC-Auto Micro 80 (Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan). The performance of FIT 1 and FIT 2 were compared to the colonoscopy findings. RESULTS Among 289 patients, CRC was diagnosed in 14 (4.8%), advanced adenoma in 37 (12.8%), early adenoma in 71 (24.6%) and no abnormalities in 141 (48.8%). For FIT 1, the sensitivity for CRC was 83.3% (95%CI 36.5-99.1%), for advanced adenoma was 24% (95%CI 10.1-45.5%), with specificity of 86.9% (95%CI 77.3-92.9%). For FIT 2, the sensitivity for CRC was 75% (95%CI 35.6-95.5%), for advanced adenoma was 50% (95%CI 22.3-77.7%), with specificity of 92.9% (95%CI 82.2-97.7%). The positive likelihood ratios were 1.8 (95%CI 0.7-4.4 for FIT 1) and 7.1 (95%CI 2.4-21.4 for FIT 2) for advanced adenoma, and 6.4 (95%CI 3.3-12.3, for FIT 1) and 10.7 (95%CI 3.8-29.8, for FIT 2) for CRC. The negative likelihood ratio were 0.9 (95%CI 0.7-1, for FIT 1) and 0.5 (95%CI 0.3-0.9, for FIT 2) for advanced adenoma, and 0.2 (0.03-1.1, for FIT 1) and 0.3 (0.08-0.9, for FIT 2) for CRC. The differences between FIT 1 and FIT 2 performances were not significant. However, the comparison of the levels of hemoglobin in feces of patients of FIT 1 and FIT 2 showed that the differences between no polyp group and advanced adenoma and CRC were significant. CONCLUSION The accuracy of OCR Sensor with 10 µg Hb/g feces cut-off was comparable to other reports and two-sample collection improved the detection rate of advanced adenoma, a pre neoplastic condition to prevent CRC incidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rejane Mattar
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), Divisão de Gastroenterologia e Hepatologia Clínica, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Sergio Barbosa Marques
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), Divisão de Endoscopia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Maurício Kazuyoshi Minata
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), Divisão de Endoscopia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Joyce Matie Kinoshita da Silva-Etto
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), Divisão de Gastroenterologia e Hepatologia Clínica, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Paulo Sakai
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), Divisão de Endoscopia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Jung YS. Strategies to Increase the Participation Rate of Colorectal Cancer Screening. Gut Liver 2020; 14:277-278. [PMID: 32400144 PMCID: PMC7234885 DOI: 10.5009/gnl20110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yoon Suk Jung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ürün YY, Aydemir S. Single dose aspirin affects fecal immunohistochemical test sensitivity in detecting advanced colorectal neoplasms: Truth or expectation? THE TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF TURKISH SOCIETY OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2020; 31:80-82. [PMID: 32009620 PMCID: PMC7075682 DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2020.090120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yonca Yılmaz Ürün
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University School of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey
| | - Selim Aydemir
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University School of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wong G, Hope RL, Howard K, Chapman JR, Castells A, Roger SD, Bourke MJ, Macaskill P, Turner R, Williams G, Lim WH, Lok CE, Diekman F, Cross N, Sen S, Allen RDM, Chadban SJ, Pollock CA, Tong A, Teixeira-Pinto A, Yang JYH, Williams N, Au E, Kieu A, James L, Craig JC. Authors' Reply. J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 30:2276-2277. [PMID: 31597717 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2019090889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Germaine Wong
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, .,Centre for Transplant and Renal Research and
| | - Richard L Hope
- Department of Gastroenterology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - Kirsten Howard
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health
| | | | - Antoni Castells
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic, Institute of Biomedical Research August Pi i Sunyer, Center for Biomedical Research in Network of Hepatic and Digestive Diseases, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Simon D Roger
- Department of Renal Medicine, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - Petra Macaskill
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health
| | - Robin Turner
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health.,Biostatistics Unit, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | - Wai H Lim
- Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Charmaine E Lok
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fritz Diekman
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nicholas Cross
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Christchurch Hospital and Otago University, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Shaundeep Sen
- Department of Renal Medicine, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, Australia
| | - Richard D M Allen
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, and
| | - Steven J Chadban
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, and
| | - Carol A Pollock
- Department of Medicine, Northern Clinical School, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, St. Leonards, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health
| | | | - Jean Y H Yang
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Eric Au
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health,
| | - Anh Kieu
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health
| | - Laura James
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
May FP, Yano EM, Provenzale D, Washington D. Reply. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:2138-2139. [PMID: 31004759 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.04.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Folasade P May
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of California Los Angeles/ Veterans Affairs, Los Angeles, California
| | - Elizabeth M Yano
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of California Los Angeles/ Veterans Affairs, Los Angeles, California
| | - Dawn Provenzale
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of California Los Angeles/ Veterans Affairs, Los Angeles, California
| | - Donna Washington
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of California Los Angeles/ Veterans Affairs, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gudra D, Shoaie S, Fridmanis D, Klovins J, Wefer H, Silamikelis I, Peculis R, Kalnina I, Elbere I, Radovica-Spalvina I, Hultcrantz R, Šķenders Ģ, Leja M, Engstrand L. A widely used sampling device in colorectal cancer screening programmes allows for large-scale microbiome studies. Gut 2019; 68:1723-1725. [PMID: 30242040 PMCID: PMC6709769 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Revised: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 08/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Dita Gudra
- Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia
| | - Saeed Shoaie
- Centre for Translational Microbiome Research, Department of Microbiology Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden,Centre for Host–Microbiome Interactions, Dental Institute, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | - Janis Klovins
- Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia
| | - Hugo Wefer
- Centre for Translational Microbiome Research, Department of Microbiology Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden,Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden
| | | | - Raitis Peculis
- Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia
| | - Ineta Kalnina
- Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia
| | - Ilze Elbere
- Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia
| | | | - Rolf Hultcrantz
- Centre for Translational Microbiome Research, Department of Microbiology Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ģirts Šķenders
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia,Institute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| | - Marcis Leja
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia,Institute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| | - Lars Engstrand
- Centre for Translational Microbiome Research, Department of Microbiology Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden,Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Rogers CR, Okuyemi K, Paskett ED, Thorpe RJ, Rogers TN, Hung M, Zickmund S, Riley C, Fetters MD. Study protocol for developing #CuttingCRC: a barbershop-based trial on masculinity barriers to care and colorectal cancer screening uptake among African-American men using an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e030000. [PMID: 31345981 PMCID: PMC6661686 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Revised: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) is preventable, as screening leads to the identification and removal of precancerous polyps. African-American men consistently have the highest CRC mortality rates, and their CRC-screening uptake remains low for complex reasons. Culture-specific masculinity barriers to care may contribute to the low uptake among African-American men. Examining these barriers to care is vital as CRC screening may challenge cultural role expectations of African-American men, whose tendency is to delay help-seeking medical care. Barbershops provide a pathway for reaching African-American men with masculinity barriers to care who are not regularly receiving healthcare services and CRC screening. This study aims to develop and pilot test a theory-driven, culture-specific, barbershop-based intervention targeting masculinity barriers to care and CRC-screening uptake among African-American men ages 45-75. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Guided by the theory of planned behaviour and the behaviour change wheel, we will use a multistage mixed-methods study design, beginning with an exploratory sequential approach to validate items for subsequent use in a pilot mixed-methods intervention. First, we will collect and analyse qualitative data from focus groups, cognitive interviews and expert item review to validate and test a culture-specific Masculinity Barriers to Care Scale (MBCS) among African-American men. Next, we will administer the MBCS to our target population as an online quantitative survey and evaluate the association between scores and CRC-screening uptake. Then, we will consider existing evidence-based approaches, our integrated results (qualitative +quantitative), and community input to design a culture-specific, behavioural intervention aimed at increasing CRC-screening uptake among African-American men and feasible for barbershop delivery. We will test the peer intervention in a pilot study with a two-arm cluster randomised design (six barbershops, randomised by site) to reduce contamination and account for barbershop culture differences. Our primary outcomes for the pilot are recruitment, sample size estimation, preliminary efficacy and acceptability. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Utah Institutional Review Board (00113679), who will also be responsible for receiving communication updates regarding important protocol modifications. To ensure confidentiality, data dispersed to project team members will be blinded of any identifying participant information. Study results will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals, community dialogue sessions, and presentations at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03733197 (Pre-results);https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03733197.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles R Rogers
- Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kola Okuyemi
- Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Electra D Paskett
- Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Roland J Thorpe
- Program for Research on Men's Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Tiana N Rogers
- Sorenson Impact Center, University of Utah Eccles School of Business, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Man Hung
- College of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences, South Jordan, Utah, USA
| | - Susan Zickmund
- Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Colin Riley
- Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Michael D Fetters
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Brenner H, Calderazzo S, Seufferlein T, Ludwig L, Dikopoulos N, Mangold J, Böck W, Stolz T, Eisenbach T, Block T, Kopp-Schneider A, Czock D, Tikk K. Effect of a Single Aspirin Dose Prior to Fecal Immunochemical Testing on Test Sensitivity for Detecting Advanced Colorectal Neoplasms: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019; 321:1686-1692. [PMID: 31063574 PMCID: PMC6506873 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.4755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Fecal immunochemical tests for hemoglobin are widely used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Observational studies suggested that sensitivity of fecal immunochemical tests for detecting advanced neoplasms could be increased by acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin), especially among men. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the potential to increase sensitivity of fecal immunochemical tests by administering a single 300-mg oral aspirin dose 2 days before stool sampling. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was conducted in 14 gastroenterology practices and 4 hospitals in Germany, and included 2422 men and women aged 40 to 80 years scheduled for colonoscopy, with no recent use of aspirin or other drugs with antithrombotic effects (enrollment from June 2013 to November 2016, and final follow-up January 27, 2017). INTERVENTIONS Administration of a single tablet containing 300 mg of aspirin (n = 1208) or placebo (n = 1214) 2 days before fecal sampling for fecal immunochemical test. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES The primary outcome was sensitivity of a quantitative fecal immunochemical test at 2 predefined cutoffs (10.2 and 17-μg Hb/g stool) for detecting advanced neoplasms (colorectal cancer or advanced adenoma). RESULTS Among 2422 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 59.6 [7.9] years; 1219, 50%, men), 2134 were included in the analysis (78% for primary screening colonoscopy, 22% for diagnostic colonoscopy). Advanced neoplasms were identified in 224 participants (10.5%), including 8 participants (0.4%) with CRC and 216 participants (10.1%) with advanced adenoma. Sensitivity was 40.2% in the aspirin group and 30.4% in the placebo group (difference 9.8%, 95% CI, -3.1% to 22.2%, P = .14) at cutoff 10.2-μg Hb/g stool and 28.6% in the aspirin and 22.5% in the placebo group (difference 6.0%, 95% CI, -5.7% to 17.5%, P = .32) at cutoff 17-μg Hb/g stool. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among adults aged 40 to 80 years not using aspirin or other antithrombotic medications, administration of a single dose of oral aspirin prior to fecal immunochemical testing, compared with placebo, did not significantly increase test sensitivity for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasms at 2 predefined cutoffs of a quantitative fecal immunochemical test. TRIAL REGISTRATION Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien Identifier: DRKS00003252; EudraCT Identifier: 2011-005603-32/DE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Silvia Calderazzo
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Thomas Stolz
- Practice of Gastroenterology, Völklingen, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Block
- Practice of Gastroenterology, Leverkusen, Germany
| | | | - David Czock
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kaja Tikk
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wong JCT, Chiu HM, Kim HS, Byeon JS, Matsuda T, Kobayashi N, Wu DC, Ong DE, Sung JJY. Adenoma detection rates in colonoscopies for positive fecal immunochemical tests versus direct screening colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89:607-613.e1. [PMID: 30452915 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Recent guidelines propose higher adenoma detection rate (ADR) benchmarks for colonoscopies performed for positive results for fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), but this is based on low-quality evidence. We aimed to compare ADR, advanced ADR (AADR), and number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) in direct screening colonoscopy (DSC) versus FIT-positive colonoscopy (FITC) in a multicenter Asia-Pacific cohort to justify differential targets. METHODS Asymptomatic average-risk patients ≥50 years of age who underwent screening colonoscopy directly or as follow-up for positive OC-Sensor FIT results were identified from 8 sites across the Asia-Pacific region. Overall, sex-specific ADR, overall AADR, and overall APC were compared between the 2 screening methods. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for confounding by differences in patient characteristics. Linear regression was used to correlate ADR with APC and to propose APC benchmarks. RESULTS A total of 2901 (mean age, 60.1 years; 57% men) individuals had DSC, and 2485 (mean age, 62.8 years; 57% men) underwent FITC. Overall ADR (53.6% vs 37.5%; odds ratio [OR], 1.93; P < .001), male-specific ADR (61.6% vs 44.6%; OR, 2; P < .001), female-specific ADR (43.2% vs 28.2%; OR, 1.94; P < .001) and overall AADR (29.9% vs 4.9%; OR, 8.2; P < .001) in FITC were significantly higher than the corresponding values for DSC. Differences remained significant after adjustment for patient characteristics. ADR was strongly and positively correlated to APC, with an ADR of 45% and 35% correlating to an APC of ∼1 and ∼0.65. CONCLUSIONS Results from this international multicenter cohort study provide early evidence that newly proposed higher ADR targets are justified as quality indicators for FITC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John C T Wong
- Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hyun-Soo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong-Sik Byeon
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Takahisa Matsuda
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Deng-Chyang Wu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital and Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - David E Ong
- Department of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Joseph J Y Sung
- Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Barriers to Follow-up Colonoscopies for Patients With Positive Results From Fecal Immunochemical Tests During Colorectal Cancer Screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:469-476. [PMID: 29857147 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Revised: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Colorectal cancer is common yet largely preventable. The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a highly recommended screening method, but patients with positive results must receive a follow-up colonoscopy to determine if they have precancerous or cancerous lesions. We characterized colonoscopic follow-up evaluations and reasons for lack of follow-up in a Veterans Affairs (VA) cohort. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patients 50 to 75 years old with a positive FIT result from January 1, 2014, through May 31, 2016, in a network of 12 VAs sites in southern California. We determined the proportion of patients who received a follow-up colonoscopy, median time to colonoscopy, and colonoscopy findings. For patients who did not undergo colonoscopy, we determined the documented reason for lack of colonoscopy and factors associated with declining the colonoscopy examination. RESULTS Of the 10,635 FITs performed, 916 (8.6%) produced positive results; 569 of these (62.1%) were followed by colonoscopy. The median time to colonoscopy after a positive FIT result was 83 days (interquartile range, 54-145 d), which did not vary between veterans who received a colonoscopy at a VA facility (81 d; interquartile range, 52-143 d) vs a non-VA site (87 d; interquartile range, 60-154 d) (P = .2). For the 347 veterans (37.9%) who did not undergo follow-up colonoscopy, the reasons were patient-related (49.3%), provider-related (16.4%), system-related (12.1%), or multifactorial (22.2%). Overall, patient decline of colonoscopy (35.2%) was the most common reason. CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of veterans with positive results from FITs during CRC screening, reasons for lack of follow-up colonoscopy varied and included patient, provider, and system factors. These findings can be used to reduce barriers to follow-up colonoscopy and to address system-level challenges in scheduling and attrition for colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
34
|
Nusrat S, Syed T, Nusrat S, Chen S, Chen WJ, Bielefeldt K. Assessment of Pharmaceutical Company and Device Manufacturer Payments to Gastroenterologists and Their Participation in Clinical Practice Guideline Panels. JAMA Netw Open 2018; 1:e186343. [PMID: 30646328 PMCID: PMC6324539 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Payments from pharmaceutical and device manufacturers to physicians may influence the advice physicians give patients and peers. OBJECTIVES To investigate the nature and amounts of monetary and other benefits that gastroenterologists received and to determine the participation of those receiving benefits in the formulation of clinical practice guidelines. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study analyzed information from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments database, including all reports about payments that pharmaceutical and device manufacturers gave to adult or pediatric gastroenterologists in 2016. PubMed was used to examine the professional affiliations and publication records of top payment recipients. Panelists of clinical guidelines who also received personal financial rewards listed in the Open Payments database were identified. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Payments made to gastroenterologists by pharmaceutical company and device manufacturers. RESULTS Of 15 497 gastroenterologists, 13 467 (86.9%) received a total of 432 463 payments accounting for a total expenditure of $67 144 862. Direct financial payments for consultations, talks, or other services were made to 2055 physicians and were responsible for 4.2% of payments (18 179 of 432 463), but for 62.7% of total expenditures ($42 086 207 of $67 144 862). Although a significant number of submissions were for food and beverages, they constituted only a small amount of total expenditure. For gastroenterologists treating adult patients, 10 products were linked to 63.8% of payments (11 221 of 17 588) related to direct financial rewards and 37.1% of the total expenditures ($24 892 643 of $67 144 862). Twenty-nine of 36 clinical practice guidelines included panelists who had received honoraria or consultation fees from industry sources, with amounts exceeding $10 000 in 8 of them (22%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Most gastroenterologists accept meals or gifts from industry, with 2055 of 15 497 gastroenterologists receiving direct payments and 8 of 36 clinical practice guidelines panelists having received more than $10 000. Considering the known impact of such benefits on prescribing patterns and other professional behaviors, policy makers should consider revising regulations governing interactions with industry and disclosure formats alerting others to their potential biasing impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salman Nusrat
- Section of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
- Section of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Taseen Syed
- Section of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
- Section of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Sanober Nusrat
- Section of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
- Section of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Sixia Chen
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City
| | - Wei-Jen Chen
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City
| | - Klaus Bielefeldt
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, George E. Wahlen Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Koïvogui A, Mab GL, Benamouzig R. Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Cohort Before and After the Change of Fecal Occult Blood Test in a French Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113:1891-1899. [PMID: 30337703 PMCID: PMC6768603 DOI: 10.1038/s41395-018-0367-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 08/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the change in the participation rate and the change in neoplasia incidence before and after the change of the Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) in the cohort included in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Program (CRCSP). METHODS Cohort of 279,210 people, aged 50-74 years, invited at least once before 2009, to participate in a CRCSP campaign. The participation rate and the cumulative neoplasia incidence were described on 4 campaigns (≤2008, 2009-2010, 2011-2012 and 2013-2014) with a Guaiac FOBT (gFOBT) and a first campaign (2015-2016) with a Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT). The cumulative incidence was estimated by the actuarial method and its confidence interval by the Greenwood method. RESULTS The participation rate decreased from 32.7% (first gFOBT-campaign) to 24.4% (fourth gFOBT-campaign) then, made a significant bound in the FIT-campaign (28.4%; p < 0.001). 35.4% of the 965 high-risk-polyps screened in this cohort were detected in the FIT-campaign. CRC incidence gradually decreased from 0.4 to 0.1/1000 person-years from the first to the fourth gFOBT-campaign before reaching a bound to 0.4/1000 person-years in the FIT-campaign. CONCLUSION Although it was still below the minimum European target (45%), the participation rate has increased between the last gFOBT-campaign and FIT-campaign, justifying the impact of promotional campaigns and the acceptance of the new test by people and GPs. A decline in the neoplasia incidence was observed between the initial and the fourth gFOBT-campaign. The change from gFOBT to FIT between the fourth and fifth campaigns, was associated with a significant increase in detection of neoplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akoï Koïvogui
- 1Comité Départemental Des Cancers (CDC‐93), 41 avenue de Verdun, 93146, Bondy, France
| | - Guillaume Le Mab
- 1Comité Départemental Des Cancers (CDC‐93), 41 avenue de Verdun, 93146, Bondy, France
| | - Robert Benamouzig
- 2Hôpital Avicenne (AP‐HP), Service d'Hépato Gastro Entérologie, 125 Rue de Stalingrad, 93000, Bobigny, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ladabaum U. Occult blood in faeces: a window into health beyond the colorectum? Gut 2018; 67:2079-2080. [PMID: 30012725 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 06/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Importance of Age-Specific Insurer Perspective on Lifetime Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113:1754-1756. [PMID: 30374119 PMCID: PMC6768587 DOI: 10.1038/s41395-018-0386-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In "Contrasting Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening under Commercial Insurance vs. Medicare", Ladabaum et al. model different CRC screening scenarios that vary the combination of payer, perspective, screening ages, and time horizons. Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy were all cost effective compared to no screening, even if initiating or stopping at age 65 years. Assuming perfect adherence, FIT and FOBT were cost saving and dominated colonoscopy. Screening between ages 50 and 64 years appeared relatively costly if only a limited time horizon was considered since the benefits accrue after age 65 years under Medicare.
Collapse
|
38
|
Leddin D, Lieberman DA, Tse F, Barkun AN, Abou-Setta AM, Marshall JK, Samadder NJ, Singh H, Telford JJ, Tinmouth J, Wilkinson AN, Leontiadis GI. Clinical Practice Guideline on Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Individuals With a Family History of Nonhereditary Colorectal Cancer or Adenoma: The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Banff Consensus. Gastroenterology 2018; 155:1325-1347.e3. [PMID: 30121253 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS A family history (FH) of colorectal cancer (CRC) increases the risk of developing CRC. These consensus recommendations developed by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and endorsed by the American Gastroenterological Association, aim to provide guidance on screening these high-risk individuals. METHODS Multiple parallel systematic review streams, informed by 10 literature searches, assembled evidence on 5 principal questions around the effect of an FH of CRC or adenomas on the risk of CRC, the age to initiate screening, and the optimal tests and testing intervals. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach was used to develop the recommendations. RESULTS Based on the evidence, the Consensus Group was able to strongly recommend CRC screening for all individuals with an FH of CRC or documented adenoma. However, because most of the evidence was very-low quality, the majority of the remaining statements were conditional ("we suggest"). Colonoscopy is suggested (recommended in individuals with ≥2 first-degree relatives [FDRs]), with fecal immunochemical test as an alternative. The elevated risk associated with an FH of ≥1 FDRs with CRC or documented advanced adenoma suggests initiating screening at a younger age (eg, 40-50 years or 10 years younger than age of diagnosis of FDR). In addition, a shorter interval of every 5 years between screening tests was suggested for individuals with ≥2 FDRs, and every 5-10 years for those with FH of 1 FDR with CRC or documented advanced adenoma compared to average-risk individuals. Choosing screening parameters for an individual patient should consider the age of the affected FDR and local resources. It is suggested that individuals with an FH of ≥1 second-degree relatives only, or of nonadvanced adenoma or polyp of unknown histology, be screened according to average-risk guidelines. CONCLUSIONS The increased risk of CRC associated with an FH of CRC or advanced adenoma warrants more intense screening for CRC. Well-designed prospective studies are needed in order to make definitive evidence-based recommendations about the age to commence screening and appropriate interval between screening tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Desmond Leddin
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Ireland; Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
| | - David A Lieberman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Frances Tse
- Division of Gastroenterology and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alan N Barkun
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ahmed M Abou-Setta
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - John K Marshall
- Division of Gastroenterology and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - N Jewel Samadder
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Clinical Genomics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Harminder Singh
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Section of Gastroenterology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Jennifer J Telford
- Division of Gastroenterology, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jill Tinmouth
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna N Wilkinson
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Grigorios I Leontiadis
- Division of Gastroenterology and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bakhai S, Ahluwalia G, Nallapeta N, Mangat A, Reynolds JL. Faecal immunochemical testing implementation to increase colorectal cancer screening in primary care. BMJ Open Qual 2018; 7:e000400. [PMID: 30397662 PMCID: PMC6203033 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2018] [Revised: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/22/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in USA, and CRC screening remains suboptimal. The aim of this quality improvement was to increase CRC screening in the internal medicine clinic (IMC) patients, between the ages of 50–75 years, from a baseline rate of 50%–70% over 12 months with the introduction of faecal immunochemical test (FIT) testing. We used the Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA) method and performed a root cause analysis to identify barriers to acceptance of CRC screening. The quality improvement team created a driver diagram to identify and prioritise change ideas. We developed a process flow map to optimise opportunities to improve CRC screening. We performed eight PDSA cycles. The major components of interventions included: (1) leveraging health information technology; (2) optimising team work, (3) education to patient, physicians and IMC staff, (4) use of patient navigator for tracking FIT completion and (5) interactive workshops for the staff and physicians to learn motivational interview techniques. The outcome measure included CRC screening rates with either FIT or colonoscopy. The process measures included FIT order and completion rates. Data were analysed using a statistical process control and run charts. Four hundred and seven patients visiting the IMC were offered FIT, and 252 (62%) completed the test. Twenty-two (8.7%) of patients were FIT positive, 14 of those (63.6%) underwent a subsequent diagnostic colonoscopy. We achieved 75% CRC screening with FIT or colonoscopy within 12 months and exceeded our goal. Successful strategies included engaging the leadership, the front-line staff and a highly effective multidisciplinary team. For average-risk patients, FIT was the preferred method of screening. We were able to sustain a CRC screening rate of 75% during the 6-month postproject period. Sustainable annual FIT is required for successful CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smita Bakhai
- Department of Internal Medicine, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Gaurav Ahluwalia
- Department of Internal Medicine, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Naren Nallapeta
- Department of Internal Medicine, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Amanpreet Mangat
- Department of Internal Medicine, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Jessica L Reynolds
- Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Brenner H, Chen C. The colorectal cancer epidemic: challenges and opportunities for primary, secondary and tertiary prevention. Br J Cancer 2018; 119:785-792. [PMID: 30287914 PMCID: PMC6189126 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0264-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 165] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2018] [Revised: 07/27/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is both one of the most common and one of the most preventable cancers globally, with powerful but strongly missed potential for primary, secondary and tertiary prevention. CRC incidence has traditionally been the highest in affluent Western countries, but it is now increasing rapidly with economic development in many other parts of the world. CRC shares several main risk factors, such as smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, physical inactivity and being overweight, with other common diseases; therefore, primary prevention efforts to reduce these risk factors are expected to have multiple beneficial effects that extend beyond CRC prevention, and should have high public health impact. A sizeable reduction in the incidence and mortality of CRC can also be achieved by offering effective screening tests, such as faecal immunochemical tests, flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy, in organised screening programmes which have been implemented in an increasing number of countries. Countries with early and high uptake rates of effective screening have exhibited major declines in CRC incidence and mortality, in contrast to most other countries. Finally, increasing evidence shows that the prognosis and quality of life of CRC patients can be substantially improved by tertiary prevention measures, such as the administration of low-dose aspirin and the promotion of physical activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Chen Chen
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Niedermaier T, Weigl K, Gies A, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H. Accuracy of a fecal immunochemical test according to outside temperature and travel time. Clin Epidemiol 2018; 10:1203-1213. [PMID: 30271216 PMCID: PMC6147538 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s170169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are widely used and recommended for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Fecal hemoglobin (Hb) may degrade with long transport durations and high ambient temperatures, potentially reducing sensitivity to detect CRC and its precursors. This study aimed at investigating the impact of temperatures and sample travel times on diagnostic performance of a quantitative FIT for detection of advanced neoplasms (AN, CRC, or advanced adenoma). Methods Participants of screening colonoscopy in south-western Germany conducted a quantitative FIT prior to bowel preparation between February 2012 and June 2016. From available locations and dates of stool sampling and transport, maximum ambient temperatures were linked to 2,870 participants aged 50–79 years and sample return durations were recorded. The impact of ambient temperatures and return duration on FIT sensitivity and specificity was assessed for five different cutoffs between 10 and 25 µg Hb/g feces. Results At a positivity threshold of 20 µg Hb/g feces, overall sensitivity and specificity for detecting any AN were 40% (95% CI, 35–47%) and 95% (95% CI, 94–96%), respectively. Inverse associations between maximum ambient temperature (median 18.1°C, inter-quartile range [IQR] =11.4–24.9°C) and sensitivity of FIT were observed which were stronger at higher cutoffs. Sample return durations (median 6 days, IQR =4–8 days) were not associated with variable sensitivities or specificities. Conclusion Hb degredation during fecal sample transportation in summer months may be of some concern for diagnostic performance of the FIT evaluated under routine conditions in a middle-European climate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Niedermaier
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, .,Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Korbinian Weigl
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, .,Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,
| | - Anton Gies
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany,
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, .,Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany,
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Amitay EL, Krilaviciute A, Brenner H. Systematic review: Gut microbiota in fecal samples and detection of colorectal neoplasms. Gut Microbes 2018; 9. [PMID: 29543545 PMCID: PMC6219654 DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2018.1445957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality. Dysbiosis in the gut microbiota may be associated with CRC. This systematic review focuses on differences in gut microbial community between people diagnosed with CRC or adenoma and healthy individuals using fecal samples, emphasizing non-invasive fecal microbiome models for CRC early diagnosis. Nineteen studies were identified in a systematic literature search of Pubmed, Web of Science and ScienceDirect. Several bacteria were reported to differ in abundance between CRC and adenoma cases and healthy controls, with Fusobacterium the most common. Fecal multi-bacterial predictive models used to distinguish CRC patients from healthy controls had reported areas under the receiver operating curve (AUCs) in external validation populations of 0.68-0.77. Though advanced sequencing techniques could in the future complement current non-invasive methods for CRC early detection, more studies with high statistical power, comparable and reproducible methods and external validation of predictive models are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efrat L. Amitay
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,CONTACT Efrat L. Amitay, MPH, PhD, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research (C070) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Agne Krilaviciute
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,Heidelberg Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Evaluation of Cancer-Associated DNA Copy Number Events in Colorectal (Advanced) Adenomas. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2018; 11:403-412. [PMID: 29685877 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-17-0317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2017] [Revised: 03/04/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
About 5% of colorectal adenomas are estimated to progress to colorectal cancer. However, it is important to identify which adenomas actually carry a high risk of progression, because these serve as intermediate endpoints, for example, in screening programs. In clinical practice, adenomas with a size of ≥10 mm, villous component and/or high-grade dysplasia, called advanced adenomas, are considered high risk, although solid evidence for this classification is lacking. Specific DNA copy number changes are associated with adenoma-to-carcinoma progression. We set out to determine the prevalence of cancer-associated events (CAE) in advanced and nonadvanced adenomas. DNA copy number analysis was performed on archival tissues from three independent series of, in total, 297 adenomas (120 nonadvanced and 177 advanced) using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification or low-coverage whole-genome DNA sequencing. Alterations in two or more CAEs were considered to mark adenomas as high risk. Two or more CAEs were overall present in 25% (95% CI, 19.0-31.8) of advanced adenomas; 23% (11/48), 36% (12/33), and 23% (22/96) of the advanced adenomas in series 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and 1.7% (1/58) and 4.8% (3/62) of the nonadvanced adenomas, in series 1 and 2, respectively. The majority of advanced adenomas do not show CAEs, indicating that only a subset of these lesions is to be considered high risk. Nonadvanced adenomas have very low prevalence of CAEs, although those with CAEs should be considered high risk as well. Specific DNA copy number alterations may better reflect the true progression risk than the advanced adenoma phenotype. Cancer Prev Res; 11(7); 403-12. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
|
44
|
Brenner H, Qian J, Werner S. Variation of diagnostic performance of fecal immunochemical testing for hemoglobin by sex and age: results from a large screening cohort. Clin Epidemiol 2018; 10:381-389. [PMID: 29670403 PMCID: PMC5896664 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s155548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin in stool are increasingly used for colorectal cancer screening. Reported sensitivities and specificities have strongly varied between studies, but it is unclear to what extent such variation reflects differences between tests or between study population characteristics. We aimed to evaluate the key parameters of FIT performance for detecting advanced neoplasia (AN) according to sex and age. Methods Sex- and age-specific sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs) for detecting AN of a quantitative FIT (FOB Gold®) were evaluated among 3211 men and women aged 50–79 years who underwent screening colonoscopy in Germany. Results At the cutoff recommended by the manufacturer (17 µg hemoglobin/g feces), sensitivity was higher (51.2% versus 34.7%, p=0.004) and specificity was lower (91.0% versus 94.8%, p<0.001) among 65–79 year-old participants compared with 50–64 year-old participants. PPVs and NPVs did not differ significantly between age groups. However, higher NPVs were observed among women compared with men (94.7% versus 92.5%, p=0.015). Specificity was also higher among women compared with men (94.7% versus 92.3%, p=0.007), while there was only a little variation in sensitivity (40.3% versus 41.8%, p=0.789) according to sex. In joint stratification by both factors, sensitivity ranged from 34.1% (95% CI 24.2%–45.2%) in 50–64 year-old women to 51.4% (95% CI 39.3%–63.3%) in 65–79 year-old men (p=0.029). The observed age and sex differences were highly consistent across a wide range of alternative cutoffs from 10 to 50 µg hemoglobin/g feces. Conclusion There are major differences in diagnostic performance parameters according to sex and age, which should receive careful attention in the interpretation and comparison of results of FIT-based colorectal cancer screening studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jing Qian
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simone Werner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Gies A, Bhardwaj M, Stock C, Schrotz-King P, Brenner H. Quantitative fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening. Int J Cancer 2018; 143:234-244. [PMID: 29277897 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2017] [Revised: 12/01/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin (Hb) are increasingly used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We aimed to review, summarize and compare reported diagnostic performance of various FITs. PubMed and Web of Science were searched from inception to July 24, 2017. Data on diagnostic performance of quantitative FITs, conducted in colonoscopy-controlled average-risk screening populations, were extracted. Summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted and correlations between thresholds, positivity rates (PRs), sensitivities and specificities were assessed. Seven test brands were investigated across 22 studies. Although reported sensitivities for CRC, advanced adenoma (AA) and any advanced neoplasm (AN) varied widely (ranges: 25-100%, 6-44% and 9-60%, respectively), with specificities for AN ranging from 82% to 99%, the estimates were very close to the respective summary ROC curves whose areas under the curve (95% CI) were 0.905 (0.88-0.94), 0.683 (0.67-0.70) and 0.710 (0.70-0.72) for CRC, AA and AN, respectively. The seemingly large heterogeneity essentially reflected variations in test thresholds (range: 2-82 µg Hb/g feces) and showed moderate correlations with sensitivity (r = -0.49) and specificity (r = 0.60) for AN. By contrast, observed PRs (range: 1-21%) almost perfectly correlated with sensitivity (r = 0.84) and specificity (r = -0.94) for AN. The apparent large heterogeneity in diagnostic performance between various FITs can be almost completely overcome by appropriate threshold adjustments. Instead of simply applying the threshold recommended by the manufacturer, screening programs should adjust the threshold to yield a desired PR which is a very good proxy indicator for the specificity and the subsequent colonoscopy workload.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Gies
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Megha Bhardwaj
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Stock
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Petra Schrotz-King
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Gies A, Cuk K, Schrotz-King P, Brenner H. Direct Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of 9 Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Gastroenterology 2018; 154:93-104. [PMID: 28958859 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Revised: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 09/17/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS A variety of fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin (Hb) are used in colorectal cancer screening. It is unclear to what extent differences in reported sensitivities and specificities reflect true heterogeneity in test performance or differences in study populations or varying pre-analytical conditions. We directly compared the sensitivity and specificity values with which 9 quantitative (laboratory-based and point-of-care) FITs detected advanced neoplasms (AN) in a single colorectal cancer screening study. METHODS Pre-colonoscopy stool samples were obtained from participants of screening colonoscopy in Germany from 2005 through 2010 and frozen at -80°C until analysis. The stool samples were thawed, homogenized, and used for 9 different quantitative FITs in parallel. Colonoscopy and histology reports were collected from all participants and evaluated by 2 independent, trained research assistants who were blinded to the test results. Comparative evaluations of diagnostic performance for AN were made at preset manufacturers' thresholds (range, 2.0-17.0 μg Hb/g feces), at a uniform threshold (15 μg Hb/g feces), and at adjusted thresholds yielding defined levels of specificity (99%, 97%, and 93%). RESULTS Of the 1667 participants who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, all cases with AN (n = 216) and 300 randomly selected individuals without AN were included in the analysis. Sensitivities and specificities for AN varied widely when we used the preset thresholds (21.8%-46.3% and 85.7%-97.7%, respectively) or the uniform threshold (16.2%-34.3% and 94.0%-98.0%, respectively). Adjusting thresholds to yield a specificity of 99%, 97%, or 93% resulted in almost equal sensitivities for detection of AN (14.4%-18.5%, 21.3%-23.6%, and 30.1%-35.2%, respectively) and almost equal positivity rates (2.8%-3.4%, 5.8%-6.1%, and 10.1%-10.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Apparent heterogeneity in diagnostic performance of quantitative FITs can be overcome to a large extent by adjusting thresholds to yield defined levels of specificity or positivity rates. Rather than simply using thresholds recommended by the manufacturer, screening programs should choose thresholds based on intended levels of specificity and manageable positivity rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Gies
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katarina Cuk
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Petra Schrotz-King
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The goal of this review is to summarize stool-based testing for colorectal cancer (CRC). The key questions answered in this review were the advantages and limitations of each available stool-based test for CRC and to examine their comparative efficacy. RECENT FINDINGS Guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) is no longer a relevant test for CRC screening. fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) tests, especially quantitative assays, are clearly a reliable stool-based test. Multitarget DNA (mtsDNA) stool testing may represent a viable option as well, although cost and test characteristics are yet fully defined. FIT and mtsDNA represent the options for stool-based CRC screening. In larger screening centers, quantitative FIT assays represent an attractive option for stool-based testing. Qualitative FIT has applicability in smaller centers. Although a large validation trial showed promising results for mtsDNA, further head-to-head trials with FIT will help define the ultimate role of mtsDNA. Ultimately, however, the best test for CRC screening is the one performed stool-based CRC screening as an initial or alternative option can increase participation in CRC screening.
Collapse
|
48
|
Green BB, Anderson ML, Cook AJ, Chubak J, Fuller S, Meenan RT, Vernon SW. A centralized mailed program with stepped increases of support increases time in compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines over 5 years: A randomized trial. Cancer 2017; 123:4472-4480. [PMID: 28753230 PMCID: PMC5673524 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Revised: 06/30/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening over many years is required to optimize reductions in colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality. However, no prior trials have compared strategies for obtaining long-term adherence. METHODS Systems of Support to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-Up was implemented in an integrated health care organization in Washington State. Between 2008 and 2009, 4675 individuals aged 50 to 74 years were randomized to receive the usual care (UC), which included clinic-based strategies to increase CRC screening (arm 1), or, in years 1 and 2, mailings with a call-in number for colonoscopy and mailed fecal tests (arm 2), mailings plus brief telephone assistance (arm 3), or mailings and assistance plus nurse navigation (arm 4). Active-intervention subjects (those in arms 2, 3, and 4 combined) who were still eligible for CRC screening were randomized to mailings being stopped or continued in years 3 and 5. The time in compliance with CRC screening over 5 years was compared for persons assigned to any intervention and persons assigned to UC. Screening tests contributed time on the basis of national guidelines for screening intervals (fecal tests annually, sigmoidoscopy every 5 years, and colonoscopy every 10 years). RESULTS All participants contributed data, but they were censored at disenrollment, death, the age of 76 years, or a diagnosis of CRC. Compared with UC participants, intervention participants had 31% more adjusted covered time over 5 years (incidence rate ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.37; covered time, 47.5% vs 62.1%). Fecal testing accounted for almost all additional covered time. CONCLUSIONS In a health care organization with clinic-based activities to increase CRC screening, a centralized program led to increased CRC screening adherence over 5 years. Longer term data on screening adherence and its impact on CRC outcomes are needed. Cancer 2017;123:4472-80. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Kaiser Permanente Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Andrea J Cook
- University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jessica Chubak
- Kaiser Permanente Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
- University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sharon Fuller
- Kaiser Permanente Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Richard T Meenan
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Sally W Vernon
- University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Krilaviciute A, Stock C, Brenner H. International variation in the prevalence of preclinical colorectal cancer: Implications for predictive values of noninvasive screening tests and potential target populations for screening. Int J Cancer 2017; 141:1566-1575. [PMID: 28670788 PMCID: PMC5601285 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2017] [Revised: 06/13/2017] [Accepted: 06/23/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is implemented in an increasing number of countries. We aimed to assess international variation in the prevalence of preclinical CRC and the resulting variation in positive and negative predictive values (PPVs, NPVs) of existing and potential CRC screening tests in various countries. Using age‐ and sex‐specific CRC incidence data and transition rates from preclinical to clinical CRC we estimated overall and age‐ and sex‐specific prevalence of preclinical CRC in the target population aged 50–74 years in different parts of the world. These prevalence estimates were used to derive PPVs and NPVs for existing and potential noninvasive screening tests with varying levels of sensitivity and specificity. Within all regions and countries, prevalence strongly increases with age and is higher in men than in women. In addition, major variation was seen between regions and countries, with overall prevalence varying between 1 and 0.1%. As a result, PPVs are expected to strongly vary between ∼10% for men in high incidence countries, such as Australia and Germany, and 1% for women in low incidence countries, whereas NPVs are expected to be consistently well above 99%. Variation in CRC prevalence profoundly affects expected PPVs of screening tests, and PPVs should be carefully considered when decisions on screening tests and strategies are made for specific populations and health care systems. Here, we provide estimates of preclinical CRC and expected PPVs and NPVs of noninvasive screening tests, which may enhance the empirical basis for planning of population‐based CRC screening strategies. What's new? Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is implemented in an increasing number of countries, usually in a two‐step approach consisting in a noninvasive test followed by colonoscopy in case of a positive result. Prevalence of preclinical colorectal cancer strongly affects screening efficiency, but such data is scarce. Here, the authors provide detailed age‐ and sex‐specific preclinical CRC prevalence estimates for various countries and geographical regions and show their implications on expected positive and negative predictive values of existing and potential noninvasive screening tests. Knowledge of these predictive values should enhance the empirical basis for decisions on CRC screening tests and target populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agne Krilaviciute
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Stock
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Niedermaier T, Weigl K, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H. Fecal immunochemical tests in combination with blood tests for colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma detection-systematic review. United European Gastroenterol J 2017; 6:13-21. [PMID: 29435309 DOI: 10.1177/2050640617737004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Accepted: 09/17/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common but largely preventable cancer. Although fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) detect the majority of CRCs, they miss some of the cancers and most advanced adenomas (AAs). The potential of blood tests in complementing FITs for the detection of CRC or AA has not yet been systematically investigated. Methods We conducted a systematic review of performance of FIT combined with an additional blood test for CRC and AA detection versus FIT alone. PubMed and Web of Science were searched until June 9, 2017. Results Some markers substantially increased sensitivity for CRC when combined with FIT, albeit typically at a major loss of specificity. For AA, no relevant increase in sensitivity could be achieved. Conclusion Combining FIT and blood tests might be a promising approach to enhance sensitivity of CRC screening, but comprehensive evaluation of promising marker combinations in screening populations is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Niedermaier
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Korbinian Weigl
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|