In vitro evaluation of the potential of aclarubicin in the treatment of small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCCL)

Aclarubicin: contemporary insights into its mechanism of action, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and clinical standing

Aclarubicin (aclacinomycin A) is one of the anthracycline antineoplastic antibiotics with a multifaceted mechanism of antitumor activity. As a second-generation drug, it offers several advantages compared to standard anthracycline drugs such as doxorubicin or daunorubicin, which could position it as a potential blockbuster drug in antitumor therapy. Key mechanisms of action for aclarubicin include the inhibition of both types of topoisomerases, suppression of tumor invasion processes, generation of reactive oxygen species, inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity, influence on cisplatin degradation, and inhibition of angiogenesis. Therefore, aclarubicin appears to be an ideal candidate for antitumor therapy. However, despite initial interest in its clinical applications, only a limited number of high-quality trials have been conducted thus far. Aclarubicin has primarily been evaluated as an induction therapy in acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukemia. Studies have indicated that aclarubicin may hold significant promise for combination therapies with other anticancer drugs, although further research is needed to confirm its potential. This paper provides an in-depth exploration of aclarubicin's diverse mechanisms of action, its pharmacokinetics, potential toxicity, and the clinical trials in which it has been investigated.

Analysis of two-gene signatures and related drugs in small-cell lung cancer by bioinformatics

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a poor prognosis and can be diagnosed with systemic metastases. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of SCLC are unclear, requiring further investigation. The current research aims to identify relevant biomarkers and available drugs to treat SCLC. The bioinformatics analysis comprised three Gene Expression Omnibus datasets (including GSE2149507, GSE6044, and GSE30219). Using the limma R package, we discovered differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the current work. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analyses were made by adopting the DAVID website. The DEG protein-protein interaction network was built based on the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins website and visualized using the CytoHubba plugin in Cytoscape, aiming to screen the top ten hub genes. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was adopted for verifying the level of the top ten hub genes. Finally, the potential drugs were screened and identified using the QuartataWeb database. Totally 195 upregulated and 167 downregulated DEGs were determined. The ten hub genes were NCAPG, BUB1B, TOP2A, CCNA2, NUSAP1, UBE2C, AURKB, RRM2, CDK1, and KIF11. Ten FDA-approved drugs were screened. Finally, two genes and related drugs screened could be the prospective drug targets for SCLC treatment.

Single agent- and combination treatment with two targeted suicide gene therapy systems is effective in chemoresistant small cell lung cancer cells

BACKGROUND

Transcriptional targeted suicide gene (SG) therapy driven by the insulinoma-associated 1 (INSM1) promoter makes it possible to target suicide toxin production and cytotoxicity exclusively to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cells and tumors. It remains to be determined whether acquired chemoresistance, as observed in the majority of SCLC patients, desensitizes SCLC cells to INSM1 promoter-driven SG therapy.

METHODS

A panel of SCLC cell lines resistant to clinically relevant chemotherapeutics was characterized regarding the expression of proteins involved in response to chemotherapy and regarding INSM1 promoter activity. Sensitivity towards INSM1 promoter-driven SG therapy was tested using different systems: Yeast cytosine deaminase-uracil phosphoribosyl transferase (YCD-YUPRT) in combination with the prodrug 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC) or Escherichia coli nitroreductase (NTR) together with the bromomustard prodrug SN27686.

RESULTS

The chemoresistant cell lines displayed heterogeneous expression profiles of molecules involved in multidrug resistance, apoptosis and survival pathways. Despite this, the INSM1 promoter activity was found to be unchanged or increased in SCLC chemoresistant cells and xenografts compared to chemosensitive variants. INSM1 promoter-driven SG therapy with YCD-YUPRT/5-FC or NTR/SN27686, was found to induce high levels of cytotoxicity in both chemosensitive and chemoresistant SCLC cells. Moreover, the combination of INSM1 promoter-driven YCD-YUPRT/5-FC therapy and chemotherapy, as well as the combination of INSM1 promoter-driven YCD-YUPRT/5-FC and NTR/SN27686 therapy, was observed to be superior to single agent therapy in chemoresistant SCLC cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, the present study demonstrates that targeted SG therapy is a potent therapeutic approach for chemoresistant SCLC patients, with the highest efficacy achieved when applied as combination SG therapy or in combination with standard chemotherapy.

Maleimide is a potent inhibitor of topoisomerase II in vitro and in vivo: a new mode of catalytic inhibition

Maleimide, N-ethyl-maleimide (NEM), and N-methyl-maleimide (NMM) were identified as potent catalytic inhibitors of purified human topoisomerase IIalpha, whereas the ring-saturated analog succinimide was completely inactive. Catalytic inhibition was not abrogated by topoisomerase II mutations that totally abolish the effect of bisdioxopiperazine compounds on catalytic inhibition, suggesting a different mode of action by these maleimides. Furthermore, in DNA cleavage assay maleimide and NEM could antagonize etoposide-induced DNA double-strand breaks. Consistently, maleimide could antagonize the effect of topoisomerase II poisons in three different in vivo assays: 1) In an alkaline elution assay maleimide protected against etoposide-induced DNA damage. 2) In a band depletion assay maleimide reduced etoposide-induced trapping of topoisomerase IIalpha and beta on DNA. 3) In a clonogenic assay maleimide antagonized the cytotoxicity of etoposide and daunorubicin on four different cell lines of human and murine origin. at-MDR cell lines with reduced nuclear topoisomerase IIalpha content are fully sensitive to maleimide, indicating that it is not a topoisomerase II poison in vivo. Our finding that topoisomerase II is sensitive to maleimide, NMM, and NEM but insensitive to succinimide demonstrates a strict requirement for the unsaturated ring bond for activity. We suggest that the observed antagonism in vitro and in vivo is caused by covalent modification of topoisomerase II cysteine residues reducing the amount of catalytically active enzyme sensitive to the action of topoisomerase II poisons.

Collateral sensitivity to gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) and cytosine arabinoside of daunorubicin- and VM-26-resistant variants of human small cell lung cancer cell lines

Multidrug resistance (MDR), characterized by a cross-resistance to many natural toxin-related compounds, may be caused either by overexpression of a drug efflux pump such as P-glycoprotein, (P-gP), multidrug resistance proteins MRP1-3, or BCRP/MXR or, in the case of DNA topoisomerase II active drugs, by a decrease in the enzymatic activity of the target molecule termed altered topoisomerase MDR (at-MDR). However, human small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) cell lines showed a collateral sensitivity to 2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine, dFdC) and 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine (ara-C). H69/DAU, a daunorubicin (DAU)-resistant variant of H69 with a P-gP overexpression, and NYH/VM, a VM-26 (teniposide)-resistant variant of NYH with an at-MDR, were both 2-fold more sensitive to gemcitabine and 7- and 2-fold more sensitive to ara-C, respectively. MDR variants had a 4.3- and 2.0-fold increased activity of deoxycytidine kinase (dCK), respectively. dCK catalyzes the first rate-limiting activation step of both gemcitabine and ara-C. In addition, deoxycytidine deaminase, responsible for inactivation of dFdC and ara-C, was 9.0-fold lower in H69/DAU cells. The level of thymidine kinase 2, a mitochondrial enzyme that can also phosphorylate deoxycytidine and gemcitabine, was not significantly different between the variants. These differences most likely caused an increased accumulation of the active metabolites (dFdCTP, 2.1- and 1.6-fold in NYH/VM and H69/DAU cells, respectively) and of ara-CTP (1.3-fold in NYH/VM cells). Ara-CTP accumulation was not detectable in either H69 variant. The pools of all ribonucleoside and deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates were at least 3- to 4-fold higher in the NYH variants compared to the H69 variants; for dCTP and dGTP this difference was even larger. The higher ribonucleotide pools might explain the >10-fold higher accumulation of dFdCTP in NYH compared to H69 variants. Since dCTP is low, H69 cells might not need a high ara-CTP accumulation to inhibit DNA polymerase. This might be related to the lack of ara-CTP in H69 variants. In addition, the increased CTP, ATP, and UTP pools in the MDR variants might explain the increased ara-CTP and dFdCTP accumulation. In conclusion, the MDR variants of the human SCLC cell lines were collaterally sensitive due to an increased dCK activity, and consequently an increased ara-CTP and dFdCTP accumulation.

Multidrug resistance and retroviral transduction potential in human small cell lung cancer cell lines

Multidrug resistance (MDR) remains a major problem in the successful treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). New treatment strategies are needed, such as gene therapy specifically targeting the MDR cells in the tumor. Retroviral LacZ gene-containing vectors that were either pseudotyped for the gibbon ape leukemia virus (GALV-1) receptor or had specificity for the amphotropic murine leukemia virus (MLV-A) receptor were used for transduction of five SCLC cell lines differing by a range of MDR mechanisms. Transduction efficiencies in these cell lines were compared by calculating the percentage of blue colonies after X-Gal staining of the cells grown in soft agar. All examined SCLC cell lines were transducible with either vector. Transduction efficiencies varied from 5.7% to 33.5% independent of the presence of MDR. These results indicate that MDR does not severely impair transduction of SCLC cells, and that MLV-A as well as GALV-1 retroviral vectors are suitable for further development of gene therapy in SCLC.

Catalytic inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase II

Catalytic inhibitors of mammalian DNA topoisomerase II have been found recently in natural and synthetic compounds. These compounds target the enzyme within the cell and inhibit various genetic processes involving the enzyme, such as DNA replication and chromosome dynamics, and thus proved to be good probes for the functional analyses of the enzyme in a variety of eukaryotes from yeast to mammals. Catalytic inhibitors were shown to be antagonists against topoisomerase II poisons. Thus bis(2,6-dioxopiperazines) have a potential to overcome cardiac toxicity caused by potent antitumor anthracycline antibiotics such as doxorubicin and daunorubicin. ICRF-187, a (+)-enantiomer of racemic ICRF-159, has been used in clinics in European countries as cardioprotector. Furthermore, bis(2,6-dioxopiperazines) enhance the efficacy of topoisomerase II poisons by reducing their side effects in preclinical and clinical settings. Bis(2,6-dioxopiperazines) per se among others have antitumor activity, and one of their derivatives, MST-16 or Sobuzoxane, bis(N1-isobutyloxycarbonyloxymethyl-2, 6-dioxopiperazine), has been developed in Japan as an anticancer drug used for malignant lymphomas and adult T-cell leukemia in clinics.

MDR1 gene expression and drug resistance of AML cells

We investigated the cellular drug resistance to aclarubicin (Acla), cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C), daunorubicin (Dau), doxorubicin (Dox), etoposide (Etop) and mitoxantrone (Mitox) using the MTT assay at time of disease presentation in 93 cases of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). In 31 cases we concomitantly investigated MDR1 (multiple drug resistance 1 gene) expression (semi-quantitative competitive RT-PCR) of the leukaemic cells. Drug resistance towards Dau, Dox and Etop was correlated to the MDR1 expression of the AML cells (P<0.05) with high MDR1 expression being associated with high drug resistance towards these drugs. Although the data did not allow firm conclusions to be drawn on the correlation between MDR1 expression and drug resistance towards Ara-C and Mitox, the drug resistance towards Acla clearly was not correlated to, or dependent on, the MDR1 expression level of the AML blast cells. In addition, when examining the cross-activities among the six drugs distinct patterns emerged. Thus, high to very high degrees of cross-activity were found to exist between Dau, Dox, Etop and Mitox, whereas Ara-C had moderate cross-activity with the other drugs except Acla, which showed absent to moderate cross-activity with the other drugs. We conclude that MDR1 gene expression is of significance for cellular drug resistance towards specific (MDR1-related) drugs in AML, whereas it is not of significance regarding drug resistance towards other drugs, which is the case with the anthracycline Acla. We suggest that in the place of other more or less complicated ways to circumvent MDR1-mediated drug resistance, Acla may be used to replace Dau, Dox and other MDR1-related drugs if proven as potent as the drug it is to substitute.

Transduction potential of human retroviruses in highly proliferating small-cell lung cancer cells as well as non-proliferating hematopoietic stem cells

Direct gene transfer to solid tissues or metastatic cancer cells requires vectors capable of in vivo transduction to specific cells. The predominant retroviral vectors of murine origin are inactivated by human complement, which precludes their use in vivo. Such inactivation does not take place with vectors based on human retroviruses. Murine retroviral vectors are also limited to proliferating cells, which human retroviruses are not. In this study we examined whether or not a vector using components from the human retroviruses HIV-1 and HTLV-1 could infect small-cell lung cancer cells and resting CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells. While HIV-1 itself was unable to infect cells lacking the CD4-membrane molecule, chimeric viral particles (pseudotype virus) with HIV-1 genome and HTLV-1 envelope components were able to infect both CD4-containing lymphocytic cells, CD4-negative tumour cells and hematopoietic stem cells. After infection with the pseudotype vector, the RNA genome was reverse transcribed and integrated. Transduction efficiency and gene expression under the HIV-1 LTR promoter in both tumour and stem cells were found to be of a similar or greater magnitude than in lymphocytic cells. These results suggest that gene transfer targeting proliferating as well as resting cells in vivo may be realized using components from human retroviruses.

Mitoxantrone-induced DNA strand breaks in cell-cultures of malignant human astrocytoma and glioblastoma tumors

In this study mitoxantrone (Mtx) induced DNA strand breaks were measured with the alkaline elution technique in short term cell cultures derived from human gliomas. Glioblastomas or astrocytomas from 5 patients who underwent intracranial surgery were cultured and incubated i h with different concentrations of Mtx (0, 0.01, 0.1 and 1.0 microgram/ml). The alkaline elution method was modified to measure DNA lesions in human gliomas. Mtx induced DNA strand breaks in a dose dependent manner in all cell cultures tested. There was a linear increase of DNA strand break frequency induced by Mtx between 0.01-1.0 microgram/ml. concerning these in vitro data, Mtx might be potentially useful for the treatment of patients with malignant brain tumors.

Cloning and characterization of human cDNAs encoding a protein with high homology to rat intestinal development protein OCI-5

We constructed a lambda complementary DNA expression library from the mitoxantrone-resistant human gastric carcinoma cell line EPG85-257RNOV. The library was screened by differential hybridization (resistant cell line against non-resistant cell variant). By this procedure we found five independent cDNA clones representing one single gene that has much higher expression in the mitoxantrone-resistant cell line EPG85-257RNOV than in the non-resistant variant EPG85-257P. One of the cDNA clones (MXR7) contains a complete open reading frame (ORF) encoding a 580-amino acid polypeptide. Amino acid and nucleotide sequence analysis revealed that this gene codes the human variant of a rat intestinal development protein OCI-5.

In vitro cross-resistance and collateral sensitivity in seven resistant small-cell lung cancer cell lines: preclinical identification of suitable drug partners to taxotere, taxol, topotecan and gemcitabin

The acquisition of drug-resistant tumour cells is the main problem in the medical treatment of a range of malignant diseases. In recent years, three new classes of anti-cancer agents, each with a novel mechanism of action, have been brought forward to clinical trials. These are the topoisomerase I (topo I) poisons topotecan and irinotecan, which are both camptothecin derivatives, the taxane tubulin stabilizers taxol and taxotere and, finally, the antimetabolite gemcitabin, which is active in solid tumours. The process of optimizing their use in a combination with established agents is very complex, with numerous possible drug and schedule regimens. We describe here how a broad panel of drug-resistant small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines can be used as a model of tumour heterogeneity to aid in the selection of non-cross-resistant regimens. We have selected low-fold (3-10x) drug-resistant sublines from a classic (NCI-H69) and a variant (OC-NYH) SCLC cell line. The resistant cell lines include two sublines with different phenotypes towards alkylating agents (H69/BCNU and NYH/CIS), two sublines with different phenotypes against topo I poisons (NYH/CAM and NYH/TPT) and three multidrug resistant (MDR) sublines (H69/DAU, NYH/VM, and H69/VP) with combinations of mdr1 and MRP overexpression as well as topoisomerase II (topo II) down-regulation or mutation. Sensitivity to 20 established and new agents was measured in a standardized clonogenic assay. Resistance was highly drug specific. Thus, none of the cell lines was resistant to all drugs. In fact, all resistant cell lines exhibited patterns of collateral sensitivity to various different classes of drugs. The most intriguing pattern was collateral sensitivity to gemcitabin in two cell lines and to ara-C in five drug-resistant cell lines, i.e. in all lines except the lines resistant to topo I poisons. Next, all sensitivity patterns in the nine cell lines were compared by correlation analysis. A high correlation coefficient (CC) for a given pair of compounds indicates a similar pattern in response in the set of cell lines. Such data corroborate the view that there is cross-resistance among the drugs. A numerically low coefficient indicates that the two drugs are acting in different ways, suggesting a lack of cross-resistance between the drugs, and a negative correlation coefficient implies that two drugs exhibit collateral sensitivity. The most negative CCs (%) to the new drug leads were: taxotere-carmustine (BCNU) (-75), taxol-cisplatin (-58), ara-C-taxol (-25), gemcitabin-doxorubicin (-32), camptotecin-VM26 (-41) and topotecan-VP16 (-17). The most negative correlations to the clinically important agent VP-16 were: cisplatin (-70); BCNU (-68); camptothecin (-38); bleomycin (-33), gemcitabin (-32); ara-C (-21); topotecan (-17); melphalan (-3); and to the other main drug in SCLC treatment cisplatin were: doxorubicin (-70); VP-16 (-70); VM-26 (-69); mAMSA (-64); taxotere (-58); taxol (-58). Taxol and taxotere were highly correlated (cross-resistant) to VP-16 (0.76 and 0.81 respectively) and inversely correlated to cisplatin (both -0.58). Similarly, camptothecin and topotecan were correlated to cisplatin but inversely correlated to VP-16 and other topo II poisons. From the sensitivity data, we conclude that collateral sensitivity and lack of cross-resistance favours a cisplatin-taxane or topo I-topo II poison combination, whereas patterns of cross-resistance suggest that epipodophyllotoxin-taxane or topo I poison-cisplatin combinations may be disadvantageous.

Antagonistic effect of aclarubicin on camptothecin induced cytotoxicity: role of topoisomerase I

The cellular target of camptothecin and several of its derivatives has been identified as topoisomerase I. Central to the cytotoxic action of camptothecin is the drug's ability to stimulate formation of topoisomerase I mediated DNA cleavages. Here we demonstrate that the intercalating antitumor agent aclarubicin inhibits camptothecin induced DNA single strand breaks in cells as measured by alkaline elution. When purified topoisomerase I was reacted with DNA, aclarubicin inhibited the formation of enzyme mediated DNA breaks induced by camptothecin. High aclarubicin concentrations (10 and 100 microM) caused a slight stimulation of topoisomerase I mediated DNA cleavage at a few distinct DNA sites. The cytotoxicity associated with camptothecin treatment measured in clonogenic assays was antagonized by preincubation with aclarubicin. This inhibitory effect of aclarubicin upon camptothecin action holds implications for the scheduling of aclarubicin in combination therapy with anticancer agents directed against topoisomerase I. Aclarubicin also inhibits the effect of topoisomerase II directed agents [such as etoposide (VP16), amsacrine (mAMSA), etc.] suggesting that aclarubicin acts against the two topoisomerases.

In vivo inhibition of etoposide-mediated apoptosis, toxicity, and antitumor effect by the topoisomerase II-uncoupling anthracycline aclarubicin

A number of clinically important drugs such as the epipodophyllotoxins etoposide (VP-16) and teniposide (VM-26), the anthracycline daunorubicin and doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and the aminoacridine amsacrine exert their cytotoxic action by stabilizing the cleavable complex formed between DNA and the nuclear enzyme topoisomerase II. We have previously demonstrated in several in vitro assays that the anthracycline aclarubicin (aclacinomycin A) inhibits cleavable-complex formation and thus antagonizes the action of drugs such as VP-16 and daunorubicin. The present study was performed to validate these in vitro data in an in vivo model. At nontoxic doses of 6 and 9 mg/kg, aclarubicin yielded a marked increase in the survival of non-tumor-bearing mice given high doses of VP-16 (80-90 mg/kg) in six separate experiments. In therapy experiments on mice inoculated with Ehrlich ascites tumor cells, aclarubicin given at 6 mg/kg roughly halved the increase in median life span induced by VP-16 at doses ranging from 22 to 33 mg/kg. An attempt to determine a more favorable combination of VP-16 and aclarubicin by increasing VP-16 doses failed, as the two drugs were always less effective than VP-16 alone. The way in which VP-16-induced DNA strand breaks lead to cell death remains unknown. However, VP-16 has been reported to cause apoptosis (programmed cell death) in several cell lines. To ascertain whether the protection given by aclarubicin could have a disruptive effect on the apoptotic process, we used the small intestine as an in vivo model. Whereas VP-16-induced apoptosis in crypt stem cells was detectable at a dose as low as 1.25 mg/kg, aclarubicin given at up to 20 mg/kg did not cause apoptosis. Indeed, aclarubicin caused a statistically significant reduction in the number of cells rendered apoptotic by VP-16. The present study thus confirms the previous in vitro experiments and indicates the value of including an in vivo model in a preclinical evaluation of drug combinations.

Synergistic and antagonistic effects of myeloid growth factors on in vitro cellular killing by cytotoxic drugs

The effect of stimulating acute myeloid leukemia blast cells with a combination of growth factors (G-CSF, GM-CSF, and IL-3) on cellular resistance to the antileukemia drugs Ara-C, daunorubicin, aclarubicin, and mitoxantrone was studied. For assessment of in vitro cellular drug resistance the MTT assay was employed. Stimulated cells showed enhanced sensitivity to Ara-C (p < 0.02), whereas a significant increase in cellular drug resistance to daunorubicin (p < 0.02) was observed. Variable and statistically non-significant changes in drug resistance to aclarubicin and mitoxantrone was induced by stimulation of the blast cells. We conclude on the basis of these observations that myeloid growth factors should be used with caution in combination with daunorubicin in AML treatment until further confirmatory evidence has been presented by other investigators.

Different modes of anthracycline interaction with topoisomerase II. Separate structures critical for DNA-cleavage, and for overcoming topoisomerase II-related drug resistance

In contrast to the classic anthracyclines (doxorubicin and daunorubicin), aclarubicin (ACLA) does not stimulate topoisomerase II (topo II) mediated DNA-cleavage. This distinction may be important with respect to topo II-related drug resistance, and the aim of this study was to clarify drug-structures responsible for this difference. Various ACLA analogs were tested for: (a) interaction with purified topo II, (b) induction of DNA cleavage in cells, (c) cellular uptake and (d) cytotoxicity. A remarkable distinction was seen between analogs containing the chromophore aklavinone (AKV) (e.g. ACLA) which have a carboxymethyl group (COOCH3) at C-10 and drugs with a beta-rhodomycinone (RMN) chromophore with hydroxyl groups at C-10 and at C-11. Thus, RMN-containing analogs, including the aglycone RMN itself, effectively stimulated topo II-mediated DNA cleavage. In contrast, AKV-containing drugs inhibited DNA cleavage and antagonized cytotoxicity mediated by RMN-containing drugs. In OC-NYH/VM cells, exhibiting multidrug resistance due to an altered topo II phenotype (at-MDR), cross-resistance was only seen to the RMN-containing drugs whereas no cross-resistance was seen to the non-DNA cleaving AKV-containing compounds. Thus, our data show that one domain in the anthracycline is of particular importance for the interaction with topo II, namely the positions C-10 and C-11 in the chromophore, and further that at-MDR was circumvented by a COOCH3 substitution at position C-10. These findings may provide guidance for the synthesis and development of new analogs with activity in at-MDR cells.

Differential cytotoxicity of 19 anticancer agents in wild type and etoposide resistant small cell lung cancer cell lines

A panel of six 'wild type' and three VP-16 resistant small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines is used to evaluate to what extent in vitro sensitivity testing using a clonogenic assay can contribute to combine cytotoxic drugs to regimens with improved efficacy against SCLC. The resistant lines include (a) H69/DAU4, which is classical multidrug resistant (MDR) with a P-glycoprotein efflux pump (b) NYH/VM, which exhibits an altered topoisomerase II (topo II) activity and (c) H69/VP, which is cross-resistant to vincristine, exhibits a reduced drug accumulation as H69/DAU4 but is without P-glycoprotein. 19 anticancer agents were compared in the panel. The MDR lines demonstrated, as expected, cross-resistance to all topo II drugs, but also different patterns of collateral sensitivity to BCNU, cisplatin, ara-C, hydroxyurea, and to the topo I inhibitor camptothecin. The complete panel of nine cell lines clearly demonstrated diverse sensitivity patterns to drugs with different modes of action. Correlation analysis showed high correlation coefficients (CC) among drug analogues (e.g. VP-16/VM-26 0.99, vincristine/vindesine 0.89), and between drugs with similar mechanisms of action (e.g. BCNU/Cisplatin 0.89, VP-16/Doxorubicin 0.92), whereas different drug classes demonstrated low or even negative CC (e.g. BCNU/VP-16 -0.21). When the CC of the 19 drug patterns to VP-16 were plotted against the CC to BCNU, clustering was observed between drugs acting on microtubules, on topo II, alkylating agents, and antimetabolites. In this plot, camptothecin and ara-C patterns were promising by virtue of their lack of cross-resistance to alkylating agents and topo II drugs. Thus, the differential cytotoxicity patterns on this panel of cells can (1) give information about drug mechanism of action, (2) enable the selection and combination of non-cross-resistant drugs, and (3) show where new drugs 'fit in' among established agents.

Doxorubicin sensitivity pattern in a panel of small-cell lung-cancer cell lines: correlation to etoposide and vincristine sensitivity and inverse correlation to carmustine sensitivity

The aim of our investigations is to evaluate whether the sensitivity patterns of small-cell lung-cancer (SCLC) cell lines in vitro can be used in evaluating new drugs and in selecting drugs for the optimization of combination therapy. In our attempts to obtain a panel of cell lines demonstrating differential patterns in sensitivity, we have developed three SCLC lines exhibiting different types of multidrug resistance (MDR). In the present investigations we compared the sensitivity patterns shown by five wild-type SCLC lines and three MDR lines in response to six different types of drugs: doxorubicin, cytarabine, carmustine, cisplatin, vincristine, and etoposide. In the wild-type SCLC cell lines, the range of variation in sensitivity to all drugs was within a factor of 10. Cell lines showing low sensitivity to doxorubicin also exhibited low sensitivity to etoposide and vincristine, and vice versa. In contrast, the pattern of sensitivity to carmustine was almost the opposite of that to doxorubicin. A tendency to an inverse relationship between doxorubicin and carmustine sensitivity was also observed when doxorubicin sensitivity was reduced in near stationary cells and in cells exposed to the metabolic inhibitor 2-deoxy-D-glucose. In agreement with the pattern observed for the wild-type lines, all of the MDR sublines demonstrated collateral sensitivity to carmustine. As to cytarabine, the wild-type lines expressed a sensitivity pattern similar to that shown in response to doxorubicin. Interestingly, the opposite pattern was found in the MDR lines, as all three demonstrated cytarabine hypersensitivity. The combination of alkylating agents and "MDR" drugs are of proven clinical benefit in the treatment of solid tumors, as is the combination of anthracycline and cytarabine in acute myeloid leukemia. The experimentally derived sensitivity data on cytarabine, alkylating agents, and MDR drugs (i.e., etoposide, doxorubicin, vincristine) thus resemble the clinical experience with these drugs, and we conclude that the use of a clonogenic assay on the described panel of SCLC cell lines can give valuable information for the selection of agents for combination therapy.

Human cell lines as models for multidrug resistance in solid tumours

In spite of our expanding knowledge on the molecular biology of cancer, relatively little progress has been made in improving therapy for the solid tumours which are major killers, e.g., lung, colon, breast. Significant advances over the past 10-15 years in chemotherapy of some tumours such as testicular cancer and some leukaemias indicates that, in spite of the undesirable side-effects, chemotherapy has the potential to effect cure in the majority of patients with certain types of cancer. Multidrug resistance, inherent or acquired, is one important limiting factor in extending this success to most solid tumours. In vitro studies described in this review are now uncovering a diversity of possible mechanisms of cross-resistance to different types of drug. Sensitive methods such as immunocytochemistry, RT-PCR or in situ RNA hybridisation may be necessary to identify corresponding changes in clinical material. Only by classifying individual tumours according to their specific resistance mechanisms will it be possible to define the multidrug resistance problem properly. Such rigorous definition is a prerequisite to design (and choice on an individual basis) of specific therapies suited to individual patients. Since a much larger proportion of cancer biopsies should be susceptible to accurate analysis by the immunochemical and molecular biological techniques described above than to direct assessment of drug response, it seems reasonable to hope that this approach will succeed in improving results for cancer chemotherapy of solid tumours where other approaches such as individualised in vitro chemosensitivity testing have essentially failed. Results from clinical trials using cyclosporin A or verapamil are encouraging, but these agents are far from ideal, and reverse resistance in only a subset of resistant tumours. Proper definition of the other mechanisms of MDR, and how to antagonize them, is an urgent research priority.

Multidrug resistance-associated antigens on drug-sensitive and -resistant human tumour cell lines

In this paper the biochemical properties of the antigens detected by six murine monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) are described. These MAbs react selectively with the multidrug-resistant small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell line, H69AR, compared to its sensitive parent cell line, H69 (Mirski & Cole, 1989). Because H69AR cells do not overexpress P-glycoprotein, the antigens detected by these MAbs may be markers for non-P-glycoprotein-mediated mechanisms of resistance. We found that the 36 kDa protein precipitated by MAb 3.186 is phosphorylated and has a pI of approximately 6.7. The 55 kDa protein precipitated by MAb 3.50 is also phosphorylated and has a pI of approximately 5.7. Several observations suggest that MAbs 3.80, 3.177 and 3.187 recognise the same 47 kDa molecule and hence only MAb 3.187 was characterised further. This MAb precipitates an acidic protein which runs as a streak on isoelectric focusing gels. The 25 and 22.5 kDa cell surface proteins precipitated by MAb 2.54 both have a pI of approximately 7.6. Treatment of immunoprecipitates with glycosidase F indicated that none of the proteins detected by MAbs 2.54, 3.187, 3.50 and 3.186 have large N-linked carbohydrates. The peptide nature of the epitopes detected by MAbs 2.54 and 3.186 was unequivocally demonstrated by precipitation from in vitro translation products of H69AR RNA. The antigens detected by MAbs 3.50 and 3.187 were not detectable in immunoprecipitates of translation products but the epitopes are probably peptides because they were destroyed by boiling in sodium dodecyl sulphate. When the reaction of the MAbs with a panel of 15 paired drug-sensitive and -resistant cell lines was examined in a cell enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, only a few resistance associated reactions were observed. Most of the reactions were either negative or not resistance-associated. When tested with three SCLC cell lines, MAb 3.187 reacted in a manner consistent with the relative resistance of the cell lines. Antigens that had similar electrophoretic mobility to those from H69AR cells were precipitated from extracts of five human cell lines of various tumour types. These data indicate that the cross-reactivities of the MAbs are due to antigens shared among the cell lines and not just the expression of common epitopes on different proteins. Resistance-associated proteins with the biochemical properties of the antigens described in this paper have not been reported previously and they remain potential markers for the as yet to be determined mechanisms of drug resistance in SCLC and other human malignancies.

Mitoxantrone. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the chemotherapy of cancer

Mitoxantrone is a dihydroxyanthracenedione derivative which as intravenous mono- and combination therapy has demonstrated therapeutic efficacy similar to that of standard induction and salvage treatment regimens in advanced breast cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, acute nonlymphoblastic leukaemia and chronic myelogenous leukaemia in blast crisis; it appears to be an effective alternative to the anthracycline component of standard treatment regimens in these indications. Mitoxantrone is also effective as a component of predominantly palliative treatment regimens for hepatic and advanced ovarian carcinoma. Limited studies suggest useful therapeutic activity in multiple myeloma and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Regional therapy of malignant effusions, hepatic and ovarian carcinomas has also been very effective, with a reduction in systemic adverse effects. Mitoxantrone inhibits DNA synthesis by intercalating DNA, inducing DNA strand breaks, and causing DNA aggregation and compaction, and delays cell cycle progression, particularly in late S phase. In vitro antitumour activity is concentration- and exposure time-proportional, and synergy with other antineoplastic drugs has been demonstrated in murine tumour models. Leucopenia may be dose-limiting in patients with solid tumours, whereas stomatitis may be dose-limiting in patients with leukaemia. Other adverse effects are usually of mild or moderate severity although cardiac effects, particularly congestive heart failure, may be of concern, especially in patients with a history of anthracycline therapy, mediastinal irradiation or cardiovascular disease. Mitoxantrone displays an improved tolerability profile compared with doxorubicin and other anthracyclines, although myelosuppression may occur more frequently. Thus, mitoxantrone is an effective and better tolerated alternative to the anthracyclines in most haematological malignancies, in breast cancer and in advanced hepatic or ovarian carcinoma. Further studies may consolidate its role in the treatment of these and other malignancies.

Antitumor activity of the two epipodophyllotoxin derivatives VP-16 and VM-26 in preclinical systems: a comparison of in vitro and in vivo drug evaluation

The epipodophyllotoxines VP-16 and VM-26 are chemically closely related. VM-26 has been found to be considerably more potent than VP-16 in vitro in a number of investigations. Although the drugs have been known for greater than 20 years, they have not been compared at clearly defined equitoxic doses on an optimal schedule in vivo and it has not been clarified as to whether a therapeutic difference exists between them. A prolonged schedule is optimal for both drugs; accordingly we determined the toxicity in mice using a 5-day schedule. The dose killing 10% of the mice (LD10) was 9.4 mg/kg daily (95% confidence limits, 7.4-11.8) for VP-16 and 3.4 (2.5-4.5) mg/kg daily for VM-26. In vitro, we found VM-26 to be 6-10 times more potent than VP-16 in a clonogenic assay on murine tumors P388 and L1210 leukemia and Ehrlich ascites. This pattern was also demonstrated in a multidrug-resistant subline of Ehrlich selected for resistance to daunorubicin (Ehrlich/DNR+), as it was 30 times less sensitive than Ehrlich cells to both VP-16 and VM-26. Using 90%, 45%, and 22% of the LD10 on the same murine tumors in vivo, we found that the effect of the two drugs was equal as evaluated by both the increase in life span and the number of cures. The drugs were also compared in nude mice inoculated with human small-cell lung cancer lines OC-TOL and CPH-SCCL-123; however, they were more toxic to the nude mice and only a limited therapeutic effect was observed. In conclusion, the complete cross-resistance between the two drugs suggests that they have an identical antineoplastic spectrum. VM-26 was more potent than VP-16 in vitro; however, this was not correlated to a therapeutic advantage for VM-26 over VP-16 in vivo.