Comparison of plasma prolactin and CEA in monitoring patients with adenocarcinoma of colon and rectum

The Value of Prolactin, a Panel of Cytokines, and the Soluble Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 in the Prediction of Rapid Progression and Shorter Survival during Palliative Chemotherapy of Colorectal Cancer Patients

The prediction of colorectal cancer (CRC) response to palliative chemotherapy (CTH) is still difficult. Patients at a higher risk of progression may benefit from more aggressive treatment. This study assessed the predictive value of prolactin (PRL) and a panel of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors for the risk of rapid progression in CRC patients starting palliative CTH. This study included 51 CRC patients initiating palliative CTH with up to 5-year follow-up, divided into rapid and non-rapid progressors. Serum samples were collected before CTH for assessment of a large panel of cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and PRL via a multiplex method. Rapid progressors (N = 19) were characterized by increased baseline values of IL-8 and IP10 but decreased PRL levels. In addition, PRL below 18.2 ng/mL was a strong predictor of weight loss during CTH. Grade 3 (HR = 2.97; 95%CI: 1.48-5.98) and PRL level (HR = 0.96; 95%CI: 0.91-1.01) were independent risk factors of progression. We showed that CRC rapid progressors are characterized by decreased baseline PRL levels. In addition, increased baseline levels of IP-10, sHER-2, IL-6, and IL-8 may be associated with longer survival; however, larger studies are needed to confirm their predictive role in CRC patients.

A capillary-driven LoC-SERS device integrated with catalytic hairpin assembly amplification technology for NSCLC-related biomarkers detection

A capillary-driven LoC-SERS device is fabricated for the ultrasensitive detection of NSCLC-related protein biomarkers with catalytic hairpin assembly as the signal amplification strategy.

Hyperprolactinaemia

Hyperprolactinaemia is one of the most common problems in clinical endocrinology. It relates with various aetiologies (physiological, pharmacological, pathological), the clarification of which requires careful history taking and clinical assessment. Analytical issues (presence of macroprolactin or of the hook effect) need to be taken into account when interpreting the prolactin values. Medications and sellar/parasellar masses (prolactin secreting or acting through “stalk effect”) are the most common causes of pathological hyperprolactinaemia. Hypogonadism and galactorrhoea are well-recognized manifestations of prolactin excess, although its implications on bone health, metabolism and immune system are also expanding. Treatment mainly aims at restoration and maintenance of normal gonadal function/fertility, and prevention of osteoporosis; further specific management strategies depend on the underlying cause. In this review, we provide an update on the diagnostic and management approaches for the patient with hyperprolactinaemia and on the current data looking at the impact of high prolactin on metabolism, cardiovascular and immune systems.

Comparative study of tumor markers in patients with colorectal carcinoma before and after chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC), the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in US, has a rising time-trend in India. Tumour markers in CRC are extensively researched, and there's still debate on their diagnostic and prognostic values.

METHODS

In this hospital-based longitudinal study in north India, 51 male diagnosed CRC cases (pre-chemotherapy) were contrasted against 50 age and sex matched controls. Nine biomarkers: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), prolactin (PRL), alfa feto protein (AFP), total human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), cancer antigen-125 (CA-125), serum testosterone, prostate specific antigen (PSA) and ferritin were measured by direct chemiluminescence technique. Further, follow-up was done on 47 cases after treatment with six cycles of 5-flurouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin.

RESULTS

Mean serum CEA (case: 5.94±8.27 ng/mL, control: 2.5±0.79 ng/mL, P<0.05), PRL (case: 28.12±13.39 ng/mL, control: 14.24±13.13 ng/mL, P<0.0001), AFP (case: 10.9±6.65 ng/mL, control: 4.02±1.26 ng/mL, P<0.0001) levels were significantly raised in CRC cases compared to controls. On the contrary, mean testosterone level (P<0.05) was lower among the cases. After chemotherapy, the mean serum CEA (P<0.05), AFP (P<0.0001) and CA-125 (P<0.05) levels among the cases decreased significantly compared to their pretreatment levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study strongly indicates the role of CEA, PRL, AFP, CA-125 and testosterone as important biomarkers in male CRC patients from north India. Further, AFP, CA-125 and CEA may be used to assess the effectiveness of chemotherapy in such patients.

Blood CEA levels for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Testing for carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) in the blood is a recommended part of follow-up to detect recurrence of colorectal cancer following primary curative treatment. There is substantial clinical variation in the cut-off level applied to trigger further investigation.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic performance of different blood CEA levels in identifying people with colorectal cancer recurrence in order to inform clinical practice.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted all searches to January 29 2014. We applied no language limits to the searches, and translated non-English manuscripts. We searched for relevant reviews in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, MEDION and DARE databases. We searched for primary studies (including conference abstracts) in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Science Citation Index & Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science. We identified ongoing studies by searching WHO ICTRP and the ASCO meeting library.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included cross-sectional diagnostic test accuracy studies, cohort studies, and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of post-resection colorectal cancer follow-up that compared CEA to a reference standard. We included studies only if we could extract 2 x 2 accuracy data. We excluded case-control studies, as the ratio of cases to controls is determined by the study design, making the data unsuitable for assessing test accuracy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (BDN, IP) assessed the quality of all articles independently, discussing any disagreements. Where we could not reach consensus, a third author (BS) acted as moderator. We assessed methodological quality against QUADAS-2 criteria. We extracted binary diagnostic accuracy data from all included studies as 2 x 2 tables. We conducted a bivariate meta-analysis. We used the xtmelogit command in Stata to produce the pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity and we also produced hierarchical summary ROC plots.

MAIN RESULTS

In the 52 included studies, sensitivity ranged from 41% to 97% and specificity from 52% to 100%. In the seven studies reporting the impact of applying a threshold of 2.5 µg/L, pooled sensitivity was 82% (95% confidence interval (CI) 78% to 86%) and pooled specificity 80% (95% CI 59% to 92%). In the 23 studies reporting the impact of applying a threshold of 5 µg/L, pooled sensitivity was 71% (95% CI 64% to 76%) and pooled specificity 88% (95% CI 84% to 92%). In the seven studies reporting the impact of applying a threshold of 10 µg/L, pooled sensitivity was 68% (95% CI 53% to 79%) and pooled specificity 97% (95% CI 90% to 99%).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

CEA is insufficiently sensitive to be used alone, even with a low threshold. It is therefore essential to augment CEA monitoring with another diagnostic modality in order to avoid missed cases. Trying to improve sensitivity by adopting a low threshold is a poor strategy because of the high numbers of false alarms generated. We therefore recommend monitoring for colorectal cancer recurrence with more than one diagnostic modality but applying the highest CEA cut-off assessed (10 µg/L).

A novel multiplexed immunoassay identifies CEA, IL-8 and prolactin as prospective markers for Dukes' stages A-D colorectal cancers

Background

Current methods widely deployed for colorectal cancers (CRC) screening lack the necessary sensitivity and specificity required for population-based early disease detection. Cancer-specific protein biomarkers are thought to be produced either by the tumor itself or other tissues in response to the presence of cancers or associated conditions. Equally, known examples of cancer protein biomarkers (e.g., PSA, CA125, CA19-9, CEA, AFP) are frequently found in plasma at very low concentration (pg/mL-ng/mL). New sensitive and specific assays are therefore urgently required to detect the disease at an early stage when prognosis is good following surgical resection. This study was designed to meet the longstanding unmet clinical need for earlier CRC detection by measuring plasma candidate biomarkers of cancer onset and progression in a clinical stage-specific manner. EDTA plasma samples (1 μL) obtained from 75 patients with Dukes’ staged CRC or unaffected controls (age and sex matched with stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria) were assayed for expression of 92 human proteins employing the Proseek® Multiplex Oncology I proximity extension assay. An identical set of plasma samples were analyzed utilizing the Bio-Plex Pro™ human cytokine 27-plex immunoassay.

Results

Similar quantitative expression patterns for 13 plasma antigens common to both platforms endorsed the potential efficacy of Proseek as an immune-based multiplex assay for proteomic biomarker research. Proseek found that expression of Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA), IL-8 and prolactin are significantly correlated with CRC stage.

Conclusions

CEA, IL-8 and prolactin expression were found to identify between control (unaffected), non-malignant (Dukes’ A + B) and malignant (Dukes’ C + D) stages.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12014-015-9081-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Prolactin signaling enhances colon cancer stemness by modulating Notch signaling in a Jak2-STAT3/ERK manner

Prolactin (PRL) is a secretory cytokine produced by various tissues. Binding to the cognate PRL receptor (PRLR), it activates intracellular signaling via janus kinase (JAK), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) proteins. PRL regulates diverse activities under normal and abnormal conditions, including malignancies. Previous clinical data suggest serum PRL levels are elevated in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. In this study, we first determined the expression of PRL and PRLR in colon cancer tissue and cell lines. Higher levels of PRLR expression were observed in the cancer cells and cell lines compared with normal colonic epithelial cells. Incubation of colon cancer cells with PRL-induced JAK2, STAT3 and ERK1/2 phosphorylation and increased expression of Jagged 1, which is a Notch-1 receptor ligand. Notch signaling regulates CRC stem cell population. We observed increased accumulation of the cleaved/active form of Notch-1 receptor (Notch intracellular domain) and increased expression of Notch responsive genes HEY1, HES1 and stem cell marker genes DCLK1, LGR5, ALDH1 and CD44. Finally, inhibiting PRL induced JAK2-STAT3 and JAK2-ERK1/2 using AG490 and PD98059, respectively, leads to complete abrogation of Notch signaling, suggesting a role for this pathway in regulating CRC stem cells. Together, our results demonstrate that cytokine signaling induced by PRL is active in colorectal cancers and may provide a novel target for therapeutic intervention.

Plasma prolactin in patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is a common malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract. It is the second cancer cause of death in females and third in males. Production of prolactin has been reported with several tumours. However, elevated prolactin plasma levels in colorectal cancer patients remained unclear.

METHODS

In this cross sectional study serum prolactin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) concentrations were assayed using immunoradiometric assay kits, preoperatively in 47 patients, and the results were compared with 51 age and sex matched controls.

RESULTS

Prolactin and CEA concentration in patients were significantly more as compared with controls. Hyperprolactinemia was found in 36 (76.6%) patients, while 28 (59.6%) had high level of CEA.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolactin may be a better tumour marker than CEA in patients with colorectal malignancy.

Molecular markers are predictors of recurrence and survival in patients with Dukes B and Dukes C colorectal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The goal was to investigate the prognostic value of various molecular markers like CEA, Cyclin D1, Bcl-2, c-Myc, p53, p21ras, Ki-67, CD44, Factor VIII-related antigen, cytokeratin-19, adenoma antigen, and prolactin in patients with Dukes B and Dukes C colorectal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

These molecular markers were localized immunohistochemically in nonmalignant (n = 36) and malignant (n = 98) diseases of the colorectum. Data were analyzed statistically using the SPSS software program. The patients with colorectal cancer were followed for a period of five years or their death within that period.

RESULTS

The expression of carcinoembryonic antigen, Cyclin D1, Bcl-2, CD44, cytokeratin-19 and prolactin was significantly higher in malignant diseases (P < 0.05), whereas, p21ras was found to be significantly higher in nonmalignant diseases (P = 0.002) as compared with their respective counterparts. Besides Dukes stage, multivariate analysis indicated a significantly reduced relapse-free survival in patients expressing CD44 and cytokeratin-19 (P < 0.005). Similarly, besides Dukes stage, multivariate analysis indicated a significantly poor overall survival in patients expressing CD44, cytokeratin-19 and prolactin (P < 0.01). In patients with Dukes B disease, only cytokeratin-19 and CD44 expression attained statistical significance (P < 0.05), whereas in patients with Dukes C disease, CD44, p21ras- and c-Myc expression attained statistical significance (P < 0.018). Also, a multivariate analysis in relation to treatment given was performed using CD44 and cytokeratin-19.

CONCLUSION

Besides Dukes stage, multivariate analysis of all the studied molecular markers showed that patients expressing CD44 and cytokeratin-19 had a significantly reduced relapse-free and poor overall survival. Moreover, patients expressing both these markers (CD44 and cytokeratin-19) had the lowest significant relative risk for developing recurrence than patients with both markers negative when treated with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy as compared with patients treated with surgery alone. Thus, in patients with colorectal cancer, immunohistochemical localization of CD44 and cytokeratin-19 may be included as a part of routine pathologic evaluation along with conventional prognostic factors.

Ectopic production of prolactin by colorectal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

This study assessed the role of prolactin in patients with Dukes B and C colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

Circulating prolactin and carcinoembryonic antigen were assayed using immunoradiometric assay and radioimmunoassay kits, respectively, in preoperative blood (n = 98) and tumor-draining venous blood (n = 34) samples of colorectal carcinoma patients. Immunohistochemical localization of prolactin (n = 98), carcinoembryonic antigen (n = 98), and prolactin receptors (n = 56) was performed. The expression of prolactin messenger ribonucleic acid (n = 50) and prolactin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid (n = 50) was studied by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Further, prolactin amplimer was sequenced.

RESULTS

Preoperative prolactin and carcinoembryonic antigen levels were significantly higher in patients with colorectal carcinoma than in controls (prolactin, P = 0.001; carcinoembryonic antigen, P = 0.0001). Univariate survival analysis showed that Dukes stage, histologic grade, and circulating prolactin were significant prognostic factors for determining overall survival (Dukes stage, P = 0.00001; histologic grade, P = 0.005; prolactin, P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, besides Dukes stage, circulating prolactin emerged as the most significant independent prognostic factor influencing overall survival. Preoperative prolactin levels showed excellent significant correlation with response to therapy and progression of disease. A significant tenfold higher mean concentration of prolactin was observed in tumor-draining venous blood than in peripheral blood (P = 0.0001). Diffuse cytoplasmic staining for prolactin was seen in 51 percent (50/98) of the colorectal carcinomas. Prolactin messenger ribonucleic acid expression was seen in 88 percent (44/50) of the colorectal carcinomas. Sequence analysis of the 234-bp prolactin amplimer revealed that the sequence was homologous to exon 5 of pituitary prolactin messenger ribonucleic acid.

CONCLUSION

These multiple approaches confirmed that prolactin is produced by colorectal carcinoma cells. Looking at its prognostic value and correlation with disease activity, it may provide new insights into treatment for patients with colorectal carcinoma.

Prolactin as a local growth promoter in patients with locally advanced tongue cancer: GCRI experience

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the role of prolactin (PRL) in men with locally advanced tongue cancer.

METHODS

Circulating PRL was assayed immunoradiometrically in pretherapeutic and sequential blood samples of 99 patients with locally advanced tongue cancer. Patients were followed for 3 years or until their death within a stipulated time. Immunohistochemical localization of PRL was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Tumoral prolactin receptors (PRLR) were estimated by ligand binding assay; the expression of PRL mRNA and PRLR mRNA were carried out by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Furthermore, PRL amplimer was sequenced and compared with human pituitary PRL amplimer.

RESULTS

Pretherapeutic PRL levels were significantly higher in patients with locally advanced tongue cancer compared with controls (p =.01). Thirty-four percent (34 of 99) of the patients had hyperprolactinemia (PRL >/=15.0 ng/mL). Univariate survival analysis showed that patients with pretherapeutic hyperprolactinemia had a significantly shorter overall survival than patients with pretherapeutic PRL <15.0 ng/mL serum (p =.0009). In multivariate analysis, PRL emerged as the most significant independent prognostic factor influencing overall survival. Furthermore, changes in serial PRL levels showed excellent correlation with response to therapy and progression of disease. Forty-four percent (24 of 54) of the tumors showed positive immunoreactivity with PRL antibody, indicating that PRL or a molecule similar to it is produced by tongue tumors. PRL mRNA expression was seen in 85% (43 of 50) of the tumors and confirmed the de novo synthesis of PRL. Sequence analysis of the 234 bp PRL amplimer revealed that the sequence was homologous to exon 5 of pituitary PRL mRNA. The action of PRL is mediated by PRLR, and it was observed that the PRLR positivity by ligand binding assay was 33%. The expression of PRLR mRNA by RT-PCR showed two forms of PRLR mRNA (ie, intermediate form [500-600 bp] seen in 82% (41 of 50 ) of the tumors and the long form [800-900 bp] seen in 36% (18 of 50) of the tumors. In 82% (41 of 50) of the tumors, either the intermediate or long form was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

This multifaceted study of PRL suggests that tongue cancer cells produce PRL, and this ectopically produced PRL might be acting as a major local growth promoter by means of autocrine and paracrine mechanisms. Looking at its prognostic value and correlation with disease activity, it may provide new insights into treatment of tongue cancer.

Lack of association between hyperprolactinemia and colon carcinoma

Two recent studies reported that many patients with colorectal carcinoma have elevated serum prolactin (PRL) concentrations and have suggested ectopic PRL secretion as the cause. In the present study, serum PRL was minimally elevated in 16 of 116 colon cancer patients and 2 of 25 control subjects; medications or chemotherapy appeared to be responsible for the PRL elevations in 11 of 16 cancer patients. Serum PRL was not correlated with either plasma carcinoembryonic antigen or disease stage. Preoperative and postoperative serum PRL concentrations were similar in 26 evaluated patients. None of 19 colorectal tumors was positive for PRL staining by immunohistochemistry. Thus, we could not confirm previous reports of frequent hyperprolactinemia in patients with colorectal cancer; factors such as medications, anxiety, pain, and nausea may have raised serum PRL in these earlier studies. Serum PRL is not a useful marker for colon carcinoma, at least in patients in the United States.

Tumor angiogenesis predicts recurrence with normal serum carcinoembryonic antigen in advanced rectal carcinoma patients

Many studies have established the usefulness of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) oriented serial monitoring for predicting recurrence and prognosis; however, few studies have so far investigated serum CEA-negative recurrence. The aim of this study was to elucidate the nature of CEA-negative recurrence regarding tumor angiogenesis. Fifty-seven patients with T3/T4 rectal cancer were divided into the two groups according to the serum CEA status. Angiogenesis was defined as the intratumoral vessel count by immunohistochemical staining using CD31. The CD31 count was significantly higher in the recurrent patients in both groups and the ratio of nodal involvement was significantly higher in the recurrent patients of the CEA-negative group. Local recurrence mainly developed in the CEA-negative group; however, the CD31 count did not predict the sites of recurrence nor the relapse period in the both groups. A multivariate analysis showed a high CD31 count >26) to be a prognostic factor not only for recurrence but also for survival (P = 0.001, 0.043, respectively). These results suggest that a high degree of tumor angiogenesis in sections of T3/T4 rectal cancer may therefore be an important predictor for CEA-negative recurrence.

Absence of prolactin gene expression in colorectal cancer

AIMS

Previous studies documenting hyperprolactinaemia in patients with colorectal cancer have suggested that the tumour is the source of hormone production. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of hyperprolactinaemia in patients with colorectal cancer before, during, and after surgery, and also to determine whether prolactin is produced by these tumours.

METHODS

Serum prolactin concentrations were measured in 20 patients with colorectal cancer before, during, and after surgical resection of their tumours. Samples taken during surgery included peripheral venous blood and blood taken from the main veins draining the tumour. To determine whether the tumour was responsible for the production of prolactin in these patients, paraffin wax embedded sections of tumour specimens were subjected to immunohistochemistry and western blotting using a monoclonal antibody to prolactin.

RESULTS

Five patients (three women, two men) had preoperative prolactin concentrations above the normal reference range, although this increase was of clinical importance in only two. After surgical resection of their tumours, prolactin concentrations remained high in both patients. All 20 patients had greatly raised prolactin values at the time of surgery, irrespective of whether this was measured in peripheral blood or in blood taken from veins draining the tumour. All 20 colorectal cancer tissue samples, including those with raised preoperative and/or postoperative prolactin concentrations, were negative for prolactin staining. Frozen tissue was also available in four cases. The absence of prolactin gene expression in these four tumours was confirmed both by repeat immunohistochemistry and by western blotting. A further 50 colorectal cancer cases examined by immunohistochemistry alone were also unreactive for prolactin.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that serum prolactin concentrations may occasionally be raised in colorectal cancer patients, but that the tumour is not the source of hormone production.

Overexpression of CD44: a useful independent predictor of prognosis in patients with colorectal carcinomas

BACKGROUND

The goal was to investigate the potential correlation between overexpression of CD44, high microvessel count (MVC), and p21ras with length of relapse-free and overall survival in patients with colorectal adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

CD44, factor VIII-related antigen (FVIII-RA), and p21ras were localized immunohistochemically in patients with colorectal adenomatous polyps (n = 8) and adenocarcinomas (n = 98). The correlation between the expression of CD44, MVC in the areas with highest density, and p21ras with relapse-free and overall survival time was investigated. Data were analyzed statistically using univariate and multivariate systems.

RESULTS

In patients with adenomatous polyps, the positivity of CD44, FVIII-RA, and p21ras was 75%, 62%, and 88%, respectively. In patients with colorectal carcinomas the positivity of CD44 was 55%, and for p21ras it was 52%. The median of FVIII-RA was 4 MVC (range, 0.0 to 32.33). MVC was greater than 4 in 53% of the patients with colorectal carcinomas. In univariate analysis, a significantly longer relapse-free time (CD44: P = .0004; FVIII-RA: P = .0006) and overall survival time (CD44: P = .0001; FVIII-RA: P = .001) were observed for patients with CD44-negative tumors and MVC below 4 as compared to those with CD44-positive tumors and MVC greater than 4. Similar observations were noted in patients with Dukes B and C disease and the rectum as the site of tumor. In multivariate analysis, only CD44 correlated significantly with both relapse-free (P = .0003) and overall survival (P = .00001).

CONCLUSION

Univariate analysis showed CD44 and MVC to be independent predictors of prognosis in colorectal carcinomas. Multivariate analysis showed that CD44 positivity was the most important indicator of an unfavorable prognosis for relapse-free and overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Thus, it can be deduced that whether CD44 is positive or negative in patients with colorectal cancer may have prognostic importance and in the future may be used as a factor in the pathologic evaluation of tumor specimens. This hypothesis needs to be tested prospectively in a larger number of patients.

Coexpression of Bcl-2, c-Myc, and p53 oncoproteins as prognostic discriminants in patients with colorectal carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical use of Bcl-2, c-Myc, and p53 oncoproteins, either singly or in combination, as prognostic discriminants relative to recurrence and overall survival in patients with Dukes B or C colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

Analyses were made on archival pathology tissues of 48 patients with colorectal cancer. The oncoproteins were localized using commercially available monoclonal antibodies: clone 124 for Bcl-2, 9E11 for c-Myc, and DO-7 for p53. The avidin-biotin peroxidase complex method was used. Patients were followed up for a period of 2 to 36 months.

RESULTS

Expression of Bcl-2 and c-Myc was cytoplasmic, whereas nuclear p53 immunoreactivity was localized in the tumor cells. Sixty percent (29/48), 65 percent (31/48), and 37 percent (18/48) of the tumors showed overexpression of Bcl-2, c-Myc, and p53 oncoproteins, respectively. Fifty-four percent (18/33) and 100 percent (9/9) of moderately and poorly differentiated tumors, respectively, were positive for Bcl-2 (P < 0.01). No such correlation was noted for c-Myc and p53 oncoproteins. Univariate analysis showed that patients with Bcl-2 and c-Myc overexpression were associated with poorer overall survival than patients with Bcl-2-negative (P < 0.0124) and c-Myc-negative (P < 0.036) tumors. In addition, when patients were subgrouped according to Dukes stage, a statistically significant poorer overall survival was observed in Dukes C patients with Bcl-2-positive tumors (P < 0.017). Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that coexpression of three oncoproteins was predictive of a worse prognosis than for those individuals expressing none of the oncoproteins (P < 0.031) and only one positive oncoprotein (P < 0.014).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that oncoprotein coexpression possesses significant prognostic and potential therapeutic value; incorporation of molecular markers into future prospective randomized trials is advisable.

Plasma and tumor prolactin in colorectal cancer patients

Fifteen consecutive patients with recently diagnosed colorectal cancer were studied for plasma and tumor tissue prolactin content. In eight patients (four men and four postmenopausal females), preoperative high plasmatic prolactin was found (mean 1553 nmol; range 516-3677 nmol). In three of them, prolactin was also present in the tumor cells. All plasma prolactin levels returned to normal after tumor resection and remained so during a three-month follow-up. The tumor stage by Duke distribution was similar for both high and normal plasmatic prolactin patients. The role of prolactin in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer, and as a marker of the tumor, remains to be established. This is the first time that prolactin has been detected in human colon cancer.

Prognostic value of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptors in patients with colon/rectal cancer: correlation with plasma prolactin

Prognostic value of IGF-1 receptors (IGF-1R) was evaluated and compared with circulating prolactin (PRL) in 59 patients with Dukes B or C colon/rectal cancer. IGF-1R was estimated by radioligand binding assay and PRL was estimated by immunoradiometric assay. Eighty-five percent (50/59) of patients had IGF-1R- tumours while IGF-1R positivity was observed in only 15% (9/59) of patients. None of the clinicopathological parameters showed any association with IGF-1R status. No significant difference was observed in overall survival period between patients with IGF-1R+ tumours and those with IGF-1R- tumours. However, a significant difference in overall survival time was observed between patients with PRL < 20.0 and > 20.0 ng/ml plasma (X2 = 4.70, df = 1, P < 0.05). In bivariate analysis, patients with IGF-1R- tumours and concomitant hyperprolactinemia had unfavourable prognosis compared to their counterpart (X2 = 4.21, df = 1, P < 0.05). We conclude that there was a trend of better overall survival in patients with IGF-1R+ tumours, and PRL < 20.0 ng/ml plasma when compared to patients with IGF-1R- tumours, and PRL > 20.0 ng/ml plasma. Further, IGF-1R negativity in conjunction with hyperprolactinemia could be used as an indicator of unfavourable prognosis in patients with Dukes B or C colon/rectal cancer.

Prolactin: its role in advanced tongue cancer

Serum prolactin was measured pretherapeutically and sequentially thereafter using immunoradiometric assay method in 37 male patients with advanced tongue cancer and compared with 23 healthy, age-matched controls. Prolactin levels were correlated with age, various clinicopathologic parameters, overall survival, and patients with response and those with progressive disease. Patients with advanced tongue cancer had higher prolactin levels than controls (P < 0.02), but intergroup variation in prolactin was not observed when considering the age, site of the lesion, disease stage, histologic grade, and keratin. Of the patients, 30% had hyperprolactinemia (prolactin > 15.0 ng/ml). To assess the prognostic significance of pretherapeutic prolactin level, the patients were divided according to the cutoff level of prolactin (15.0 ng/ml). Hyperprolactinemic patients had more unfavourable prognosis than patients with prolactin < 15.0 ng/ml (X2 = 2.91, df = 1, P < 0.0037). In monitoring disease course, patients who responded to treatments had decreased prolactin levels at the end of 18 months as compared to their pretherapeutic levels (P < 0.01). In patients who subsequently developed progressive disease within 18 months, prolactin levels reduced initially at response, whereas with disease progression, prolactin levels increased significantly (P < 0.05). The positive and negative predictive value of prolactin was 100%. Immunohistochemical localization confirmed the ectopic production of prolactin by tongue tumors. In conclusion, our data indicate that hyperprolactinemia may be an independent predictor of short-term prognosis; circulating prolactin may be used as a marker for monitoring disease course in patients with advanced tongue cancer, and prolactin is produced ectopically by tongue tumors.

The value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen in predicting recurrent disease following curative resection of colorectal cancer

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) estimations are used to facilitate early diagnosis of recurrent disease after treatment for colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE

This study was designed to determine the natural history of patients with normal and abnormal levels of CEA.

METHODS

Patients undergoing potential curative resection of colorectal tumors (Dukes Stage A-C) entered a prospective, randomized trial comparing two follow-up regimens (to be reported separately) had CEA levels measured every 3 months for two years; then every 6 months for the next three years. In the study protocol, a rise in CEA was not an indication for investigation to determine recurrence unless there was also other evidence of recurrent disease.

RESULTS

Three hundred eleven patients were followed for a median of 4.5 (range, 2-5) years. Recurrent disease developed in 98 (32 percent) patients, 57 of whom had an elevated CEA (sensitivity 58 percent), with a median lead time of six (range, 1-30) months from first abnormal CEA to diagnosis of recurrent disease by other means. The specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CEA as an indicator of subsequent recurrent disease was 93 percent, 79 percent, and 83 percent, respectively. The sensitivity of CEA for predicting hepatic metastases was 80 percent, with a median lead time of eight (range, 1-30) months, compared with only 46 percent for sites of recurrent disease other than the liver.

CONCLUSIONS

CEA was the first indicator of recurrent disease in 58 percent of all patients and in 80 percent of patients with liver metastases. The diagnosis of recurrent disease may be made several months earlier by investigating the first abnormal CEA level, although any benefit in terms of survival remains to be proven.

Interrelationship of prolactin and its receptor in carcinoma of colon and rectum: a preliminary report

The prolactin receptors (PRLR) were correlated with circulating prolactin and various clinicopathologic parameters to investigate its prognostic value in patients with colorectal cancer. The prolactin (by radioimmunoassay) and its receptors (by radioligand method) were estimated in a total of 71 male patients with colorectal cancer enrolled at the Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad. The patients were followed for a period of 3 years. We have observed that 51% colorectal tumors were PRLR+. Significant correlation was not observed between presence/absence of PRLR and clinicopathologic variables. Dukes' D patients were lost to follow-up after 2-3 months; therefore, the results of prognostic significance were analysed only in patients with Dukes' A, B, and C (N = 64). Statistically significant difference in overall survival was not observed when the patients were subgrouped according to the presence/absence of PRLR and according to the cutoff level (i.e., 2%). PRLR+ hyperprolactinemic (Prolactin > 20.0 ng/ml plasma) patients had better overall survival than that of patients with PRLR- hyperprolactinemia, although the difference was statistically nonsignificant. However, PRLR- hyperprolactinemia patients had a more unfavourable prognosis than that of their counterparts. A similar trend was observed in patients with Dukes' B and C disease. Our preliminary study suggests an unequivocal finding, that PRLR- with concomitant hyperprolactinemia probably characterises a subgroup of patients with aggressive colorectal cancer.

Plasma prolactin in patients with colorectal cancer. Value in follow-up and as a prognosticator

BACKGROUND

Preoperative plasma prolactin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were assessed to monitor disease recurrence and to identify low-risk and high-risk patients with Dukes B or C colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Prolactin and CEA were estimated by radioimmunoassay method. Blood samples were collected preoperatively and sequentially thereafter from patients with colorectal cancer (N = 114); the samples were compared with samples from age-matched healthy control subjects (smokers and nonsmokers, N = 45). For rest of the analysis, patients with Dukes A disease (N = 7) were not included because of the small number. In monitoring recurrences, the criteria for positive test for the two markers was a continual increase in the marker level after an initial decrease or persistent high level of the marker. These were the indicators of relapse or no response to treatment. To determine the efficacy of the preoperative markers, the patients were grouped according to disease status at the end of 3 years, i.e., patients who had response to the treatment modalities (N = 52) and patients who later had progressive disease (N = 55). To determine the prognostic significance of preoperative marker levels, the patients were divided according to the cutoff levels (upper normal limits); for prolactin the cutoff level was 20.0 ng/ml plasma, and for CEA it was 5.0 ng/ml plasma.

RESULTS

Both of the markers were significantly high in patients with colorectal cancer compared with the markers of their respective control subjects (P < 0.0001). In monitoring disease course, the predictive power of prolactin was 100%, whereas that of CEA was 66%. Prolactin showed a lead time of 2-3 months. Preoperative prolactin levels were significantly higher in patients who later had progressive disease (P < 0.001) than in patients who had response to the treatments. However, such an intergroup variation was not observed for CEA. Patients with preoperative levels of prolactin greater than 20.0 ng/ml had shorter overall survival times than did those with prolactin levels less than 20.0 ng/ml plasma; such a trend was not observed for patients with CEA levels less than 5.0 ng/ml and those with CEA levels greater than 5.0 ng/ml plasma.

CONCLUSION

Prolactin is a better overall marker than is CEA in patients with Dukes B or C colorectal cancer. The authors recommend the use of plasma prolactin levels to help identify low-risk and high-risk patient subgroups so that high-risk patients may be followed up more intensely and treated accordingly. Hyperprolactinemic patients with Dukes B or C disease have shortened survival time.