A phase II study of high dose epirubicin in unresectable non small cell lung cancer

Identification of cardiotoxicity related to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatments: A systematic review

Introduction: In the last few decades, there has been a rapid development in cancer therapies and improved detection strategies, hence the death rates caused by cancer have decreased. However, it has been reported that cardiovascular disease has become the second leading cause of long-term morbidity and fatality among cancer survivors. Cardiotoxicity from anticancer drugs affects the heart's function and structure and can occur during any stage of the cancer treatments, which leads to the development of cardiovascular disease. Objectives: To investigate the association between anticancer drugs for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and cardiotoxicity as to whether: different classes of anticancer drugs demonstrate different cardiotoxicity potentials; different dosages of the same drug in initial treatment affect the degree of cardiotoxicity; and accumulated dosage and/or duration of treatments affect the degree of cardiotoxicity. Methods: This systematic review included studies involving patients over 18 years old with NSCLC and excluded studies in which patients' treatments involve radiotherapy only. Electronic databases and registers including Cochrane Library, National Cancer Institute (NCI) Database, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and the European Union Clinical Trials Register were systematically searched from the earliest available date up until November 2020. A full version protocol of this systematic review (CRD42020191760) had been published on PROSPERO. Results: A total of 1785 records were identified using specific search terms through the databases and registers; 74 eligible studies were included for data extraction. Based on data extracted from the included studies, anticancer drugs for NSCLC that are associated with cardiovascular events include bevacizumab, carboplatin, cisplatin, crizotinib, docetaxel, erlotinib, gemcitabine and paclitaxel. Hypertension was the most reported cardiotoxicity as 30 studies documented this cardiovascular adverse event. Other reported treatment-related cardiotoxicities include arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, cardiac arrest, cardiac failure, coronary artery disease, heart failure, ischemia, left ventricular dysfunction, myocardial infarction, palpitations, and tachycardia. Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review have provided a better understanding of the possible association between cardiotoxicities and anticancer drugs for NSCLC. Whilst variation is observed across different drug classes, the lack of information available on cardiac monitoring can result in underestimation of this association. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020191760, identifier PROSPERO CRD42020191760.

Phase II Study of the Activity and Tolerability of a Combined Regimen of High-Dose Epirubicin and Cisplatin in Stage IIIb and IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

AIM

To explore the feasibility and activity of a combined regimen of high-dose epirubicin and cisplatin as an alternative to current treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHOD

Forty-four patients with stage IIIb or IV NSCLC, median Karnofsky index 90, were enrolled. Epirubicin (60 mg/m2) was administered on days 1 and 2 and cisplatin (100 mg/m2) on day 1. Treatment was repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. A hematopoietic growth factor (G-CSF) was used only for patients reaching codified nadir count values.

RESULTS

A total of 130 cycles were administered with a mean of 2.9 cycles per patient. Of 41 assessable patients one showed a complete response and 15 had partial responses (overall response rate, 39%). Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia and grade 3 hemoglobin toxicity were seen in 40% and 14%, respectively, of the administered cycles. The most common nonhematologic toxic events were nausea and vomiting, mucositis, anorexia, and asthenia.

CONCLUSIONS

This epirubicin-cisplatin regimen seemed effective and was generally well tolerated, and therefore suitable for use in an outpatient setting.

Multicenter phase II study of amrubicin, 9-amino-anthracycline, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (Study 1): West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) trial

PURPOSE

Amrubicin is a novel 9-aminoanthracycline. This multicenter phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of amrubicin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-one previously untreated patients with stage III or IV NSCLC were entered this study. The patients were required to have cytologically or histologically proven measurable NSCLC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, and adequate organ function. Amrubicin was administered by daily intravenous injection at 45 mg/m2/day for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks. At least 3 cycles of treatment were administered to each patient.

RESULTS

All 61 patients registered in this trial were eligible and assessable for efficacy and toxicity. Of them, 17 patients achieved objective responses, consisting of one complete response and 16 partial responses, and the overall response rate was 27.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.1% to 40.8%). The median survival time was 9.8 months (95% CI, 7.7 months to 14.9 months). The major toxicity was myelosuppression. The incidences of grade 3 or 4 toxicity were 72.1% for neutropenia, 52.5% for leukopenia, 23.0% for anemia, and 14.8% for thrombocytopenia. As noticeable toxic events, grade 3 hypotention and alkaline phosphatase elevation were transiently observed in one patient each. In addition, three patients who had had asymptomatic interstitial pneumonitis, identified by diagnostic imaging before treatment, aggravated after amrubicin treatment; two of them died. Other non-hematologic toxicities were relatively mild.

CONCLUSION

Amrubicin was an active, well-tolerated agent in the treatment of NSCLC.

Phase II study of sequential treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: three cycles of high-dose epirubicin plus cisplatin followed by weekly vinorelbine

Previous phase I, II, and III studies on high-dose epirubicin (HDEPI), alone or in combination with cisplatin (CP), indicate an interesting activity of this drug in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the toxicological profile of HDEPI limits its prolonged use. In our experience, vinorelbine (VNR) seems to be a suitable drug for long-term monotherapy for advanced NSCLC. On these grounds, advanced NSCLC patients were treated with the following strategy: 3 consecutive cycles of CP 60 mg/m2 and HDEPI 120 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks; then, irrespective of response, weekly VNR at a dose of 25 mg/m2 was administered at home. From December 1996 to March 1998, 25 patients entered the study. After receiving 3 cycles of CP/HDEPI, 8 patients (32%) had a partial response and 3 (12%) had a minor response. Nine patients had stable disease (36%) and 4 (16%) had progressive disease. Twenty-three patients received weekly VNR, and the median number of administrations was 10 (range, 1-38). After VNR treatment, we observed a partial response in 2 patients who previously had stable disease. Therefore, the overall response rate to sequential treatment was 40%; median time to progression was 7 months (range, 2-26 months). The major toxicities due to the CP/HDEPI regimen were neutropenia (72%) and alopecia (80%). During the VNR treatment, grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 36% of patients. The doses and the timing of VNR administrations were modified according to toxicity. Symptoms such as cough, dyspnea, and pain, present in 21 patients before the treatment, improved in 11 cases (52%). Median overall survival is 9 months (range, 3-40+ months); one patient is still alive after 40 months. One- and 2-year survival rates are, respectively, 44% and 16%. This study confirms the activity of CP/HDEPI in NSCLC and indicates that the sequential treatment of CP/HDEPI for 3 cycles followed by weekly VNR could be considered an effective strategy for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

First-line gemcitabine with cisplatin or epirubicin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial

The purpose of our study was to compare progression-free survival and quality of life (QOL) after cisplatin–gemcitabine (CG) or epirubicin–gemcitabine (EG) in chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients (n=240) were randomised to receive gemcitabine 1125 mg m⁻² (days 1 and 8) plus either cisplatin 80 mg m⁻² (day 2) or epirubicin 100 mg m⁻² (day 1) every 3 weeks for a maximum of five cycles. Eligible patients had normal organ functions and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ⩽2. QOL was measured with European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and LC13 questionnaires. There were no significant differences in median progression-free survival (CG 26 weeks, EG 23 weeks), median overall survival (CG 43 weeks, EG 36 weeks), or tumour response rates (CG 46%, EG 36%). Toxicity was mainly haematologic. In the EG arm granulocytopenia occurred more frequently, leading to more febrile neutropenia. Also, elevation of serum transaminases, mucositis, fever, and decline in LVEF were more common in the EG arm. In the CG arm, more patients experienced elevated serum creatinine levels, sensory neuropathy, nausea, and vomiting. Global QOL was not different in both arms. Progression-free survival, overall survival, response rate, and QOL were not different between both arms; however, overall toxicity was more severe in the EG arm.

Anthracyclines in non-small cell lung cancer

The literature concerning the use of anthracyclines in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is reviewed here. Overall, the activity of doxorubicin (DOXO) is unsatisfactory, whereas, the analogous epidoxorubicin (EPI) yields a 30% response rate (RR) when administered at intermediate-high doses. All active drugs, including EPI, should be considered to design the most active combination. Mainly, in the setting, in which an objective response is very important, for instance the neo-adjuvant pre-operatory setting.

Accelerated cisplatin and high-dose epirubicin with G-CSF support in patients with relapsed non-small-cell lung cancer: feasibility and efficacy

The purpose of this study is to determine whether it is feasible to administer high-dose epirubicin (135 mg m(-2)) combined with a fixed dose of cisplatin every 2 weeks with G-CSF support in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Subsequently, the efficacy of the recommended dose of this regimen was tested in a phase II study in patients with relapsed NSCLC. In the initial feasibility study at least 6 patients were entered at each of the 4 dose levels tested. A fixed dose of cisplatin 60 mg m(-2) was given. Epirubicin was administered at 120 mg m(-2) on dose level 1, 135 mg m(-2) on dose level 2 and 3 and 135 mg m(-2) on dose level 4. Patients treated at dose level 3 and 4 received G-CSF support on days 3-12. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks on the first 3 dose levels and every 2 weeks on the fourth dose level. A total of 27 patients were then treated on dose level 4, which appeared to be feasible in the initial study. In the initial study, a total of 86 courses were administered. Haematological toxicity was the principal side effect. None of the patients encountered dose-limiting toxicity in the first course, which confirmed that epirubicin 135 mg m(-2) could be combined with cisplatin 60 mg m(-2) and accelerated by G-CSF support to a 14-day-schedule. In the subsequent phase II study with this schedule, 89 courses were administered. The relative dose intensity of cisplatin and epirubicin was 0.90 and 0.91, respectively. Myelosuppression was frequent with 70% and 63% of patients experiencing WHO grade III or IV leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. 6 cases of febrile neutropenia were observed, with 2 treatment-related deaths. Non-haematological toxicity consisted mainly of nausea and vomiting, which was grade III in 22% of patients. Renal toxicity grade I and II occurred in 37% and 4% of patients, respectively. 55% of these patients had received prior cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. On an intention-to-treat basis 9 partial responses were recorded in 27 patients (33%; 95% confidence interval, 15%-51%). Accelerated cisplatin and high-dose epirubicin with G-CSF support is a feasible and promising regimen in relapsed NSCLC. Myelosuppression limits the use of this regimen in the second-line setting to a selected group of patients with a good performance status. Since the activity of this regimen is encouraging, it is probably best studied in untreated patients.

Phase I-II study of high dose epirubicin plus cisplatin in unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: searching for the maximal tolerated dose

The purpose of this study was to search for the maximal tolerated dose of cisplatin in the cisplatin plus high-dose epirubicin combination for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. The following range of cisplatin dosages were tested in a phase I study: 75, 90, 105, and 120 mg/m2 in combination with epirubicin 120 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Eligibility consisted of previously untreated stage IIIb or IV non-small-cell lung cancers, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status less than or equal to 2, age less than or equal to 70 years, measurable disease, adequate blood counts, chemistry, cardiac function, and no brain metastasis. The maximal tolerated dose was defined as the dose level of cisplatin for which two of three patients or three of six patients developed one or more limiting toxicities during the first course of therapy. Afterward, the maximal tolerated dose of cisplatin was adopted in a subsequent phase II study. Three centers enrolled 42 patients: 18 in phase I and 24 in phase II. The maximal tolerated dose was almost reached at the last dose level (i.e., 120 mg/m2). Taking into account the total duration of the treatment, the real dose intensity for patients treated at the fourth dose level (120 mg/m2) did not differ from that of the third dose level (105 mg/m2). The latter dosage was therefore considered as the maximal tolerated one. In the subsequent phase II study, the median number of cycles received per patient was three (range: one to eight). Fifty percent required a dose reduction of either epirubicin, cisplatin, or both. The main toxicity was neutropenia, resulting in 10 episodes of febrile grade IV neutropenia requiring readmission. Other toxicities were mild to moderate. There was no toxic-related death. On intent-to-treat analysis, 10 patients (33%) achieved an objective response. Among them were three complete responders. Median survival was 8 months. We observed neither detraction nor improvement of quality of life as assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30-LC13. Given every 3 weeks in combination with epirubicin 120 mg/m2, the maximal tolerated cisplatin dose is 105 mg/m2. This combination yields activity in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Results of a dose-intense phase 1 study of a combination chemotherapy regimen with cisplatin and epidoxorubicin including medroxyprogesterone acetate and recombinant interleukin-2 in patients with inoperable primary lung cancer

Based on the role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of cancer-related anorexia-cachexia and the ability of progestins, such as medroxyprogesterone acetate, to reduce cytokine production and relieve cancer-related anorexia-cachexia symptoms, the authors designed an open, dose-finding phase I study of a combined chemotherapy regimen (cisplatin [CDDP], epidoxorubicin [EPI]), including recombinant interleukin-2 (IL-2) and medroxyprogesterone acetate for patients with stage IIIB to IV inoperable primary lung cancer. The end points were clinical response and toxicity with definition of dose-limiting toxicity and maximal tolerable dose; relief of cancer-related anorexia-cachexia symptoms; the assessment of patient serum levels of IL-1beta, IL-6, tumor-necrosing factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and soluble IL-2 receptor (sIL-2R). From March to October 1997, 16 patients (M:F ratio, 14:2; mean age, 60.5 years; age range, 41 to 74 years) were enrolled. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 14 of them for response. The patients were assigned to increasing dose levels of drugs according to a dose-escalation schedule. The weekly schedule consisted of a combination of CDDP given intravenously on day 1, EPI given intravenously on day 1, 1 g/day medroxyprogesterone acetate given orally on days 1 to 7, and recombinant IL-2 1.8 MIU administered subcutaneously on days 2 to 7 plus 300 microg granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support given subcutaneously on days 2 to 5. Administration of medroxyprogesterone acetate began 1 week before the first cycle. Dose escalation of the drugs was as follows: 30 mg x m2 x week(-1) CDDP and 25 mg x m2 x week(-1) EPI (first level, two patients); 30 mg x m2 x week(-1) CDDP and 33 mg x m2 x week(-1) EPI (second level, 2 patients); 40 mg x m2 x week(-1) CDDP and 33 mg x m2 x week(-1) EPI (third level, 6 patients); and 40 mg x m2 x week(-1) CDDP and 40 mg x m2 x week(-1) EPI (fourth level, 6 patients). Six cycles were planned for each patient. The actual dose intensity delivered was more than 80% of the projected dose intensity of all drugs. After six cycles, clinical response (according to World Health Organization criteria), toxicity (according to World Health Organization criteria), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, body weight, appetite, and serum levels of cytokines were evaluated. After six cycles, 9 of 14 patients (64.3%) had partial response, 3 of 14 (21.4%) had stable disease, and 2 of 14 (14.3%) had progressive disease, and the objective response rate was 64.3%. ECOG performance status and body weight did not change significantly after treatment, whereas appetite showed an increase that was of borderline statistical significance. Toxicity was acceptable and only hematologic. Dose-limiting toxicity was established at the fourth dose level; consequently, maximal tolerable dose was assessed at the third dose level. Before treatment, the serum levels of IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF-alpha were significantly greater in the patients than in healthy persons. The comparison between pretreatment and posttreatment serum values of IL-1beta, IL-6, TNF-alpha, and sIL-2R did not reveal significant differences in the patients. Similar results were obtained when the patients were considered as responders (partial response) or non-responders (stable or progressive disease) to therapy. Only IL-6 serum levels were increased (p = 0.014) after treatment.

Activity of high-dose epirubicin combined with gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase I and II study

The aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy and tolerance of epirubicin and gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. A phase I study was performed with the combination of escalating doses of epirubicin intravenously on day 1 and a fixed dose of gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 of a 21 -day cycle. Eighteen patients were included in the phase I part of the study before the maximum tolerated dose was found. Dose-limiting toxicity was febrile neutropenia. The phase II part of the study was continued with epirubicin 100 mg m(-2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1125 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Forty-three chemotherapy-naive patients were included. The median age of the patients was 60 years (range 26-75). Most patients (74%) were in stage IV. Granulocytopenia CTC grade 4 occurred in 32.5% and thrombocytopenia grade 4 in 11.6% of cycles. Febrile neutropenia occurred in six patients. Non-haematological toxicity was mainly mucositis CTC grade 2 and 3 in 35% of patients. The tumour response rate was 49% (95% confidence interval (CI) 35-63%). The median survival time for the patients was 42 weeks (95% CI 13-69).

Anthracyclines in non-small-cell lung cancer: do they have a therapeutic role?

BACKGROUND

Owing to its low level of activity together with its potential cardiotoxicity, doxorubicin (DXR) has been considered as having a marginal role in the treatment of NSCLC. Its analogue, epirubicin (EPI), has also shown a poor antitumor activity in the treatment of NSCLC when used at 'standard' doses (= 90 mg/m2). On the contrary, high-dose epirubicin (HD-EPI) (> 90 mg/m2) has demonstrated antitumor activity as a single agent in the treatment of advanced NSCLC in six small phase II studies (mean 25%, range 17%-36%).

RESULTS

A series of consecutive studies on the activity of HD-EPI alone or in combination regimens were carried out at the Division of Medical Oncology of S. Orsola-M. Malpighi Hospital. After activity was confirmed in advanced disease with doses between 120 and 165 mg/m2 (PR in 6 of 24 = 25%), a phase II study was carried out on the combination of HD-EPI 120 mg/m2 + cisplatinum (CP) 60 mg/m2 in stage IIIB-IV NSCLC. PR was achieved in 54% of 35 patients with a median survival of nine months. A subsequent multicenter phase III trial compared HD-EPI and vinorelbine (VNR), both combined with CP. Two hundred twenty-eight patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were randomized to receive either EPI 120 mg/m2 plus CP 60 mg/m2 on day 1 or VNR 25 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8 plus CP 60 mg/m2 on day 1. Both treatments were recycled every 21 days. Eligible patients were 212 and 210 patients evaluable for objective response (100 on HD-EPI and 110 on VNR), respectively. The CR + PR rate was 32% vs. 26% (P = NS) for a median duration of nine and eight months, respectively. Median survival was 10 and 9.5 months, respectively. Grade III-IV leucopenia occurred in 38% and 21% on HD-EPI and VNR, respectively (P = 0.01), thrombocytopenia in 6% and 0% (P = 0.02), anemia in 8% and 7% (NS). Non-hematological toxicity was moderate and the only difference between the treatments was alopecia (88% vs. 33% on HD-EPI and VNR, respectively). Supraventricular arrhythmia occurred in three patients on HD-EPI; a > 15% LVEF decrease by MUGA scan was observed in 22.5% and 14% patients on HD-EPI and VNR, respectively (NS). No congestive heart failure was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

EPI can be safely administered at a dose of 120-135 mg/m2 in non-pretreated patients showing a significant antitumor activity in NSCLC. If the cumulative dose of 800-900 mg/m2 is not exceeded, clinical manifestations of cardiotoxicity are very rare. However, grade 3-4 myelotoxicity and alopecia are very common and can limit the use of this drug in the palliative treatment of this disease. Interesting results are observed in an ongoing pilot study that employed HD-EPI + CP + VNR + G-CSF in the induction therapy of locally advanced NSCLC.

Response rate as an endpoint for evaluating new cytotoxic agents in phase II trials of non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Response rate (RR) has been used as a defining endpoint of new-agent phase II trials for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, tumor responses to chemotherapy do not always result in prolonged survival of patients with this disease.

DESIGN

Single-agent phase II trials were identified by a MEDLINE search of the period from 1976 to 1995. Associations between RR, median survival time (MST) and characteristics of patients who entered the trial, including tumor extent, performance status and prior chemotherapy, were studied by using the logistic regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 183 treatment arms in 176 trials (including 10 randomized phase II trials) were identified. The overall RR in the 6768 evaluable patients was 11%. Eleven drugs, cisplatin, epirubicin, ifosfamide, edatrexate, irinotecan, vinorelbine, docetaxel, paclitaxel, etoposide, vindesine, and 254-S, produced a RR of more than 20%. An MST of eight months or longer was obtained with 12 drugs, but there were cases in which no objective responses were produced by these drugs. MST was correlated with RR (r = 0.504, P < 0.0001), but ranged broadly at a given level of RR. Multiple linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between RR and MST (regression coefficient = 0.60, P = 0.00003) after adjustment for other variables.

CONCLUSIONS

RR was significantly correlated with MST in single-agent phase II trials for NSCLC, but there is room for further consideration of the endpoint of these trials.

Phase I study of high-dose epirubicin and vinorelbine in previously untreated non-small-cell lung cancer stage IIIB-IV

The aim of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the combination of high-dose epirubicin and vinorelbine in chemotherapy-naive patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Twenty-one patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC were treated in a single-centre study with escalating doses of epirubicin and vinorelbine given on an outpatient basis. The first dose level comprised epirubicin 100 mg m-2 on day 1 and vinorelbine 20 mg m-2 (days 1 and 8) given intravenously every 3 weeks. Escalating doses for epirubicin and vinorelbine were respectively 120 (day 1) and 20 (days 1 and 8), 120 (day 1) and 25 (days 1 and 8) and 135 (day 1) and 25 (days 1 and 8) mg m-2. Inclusion criteria were age < or = 75 years, ECOG performance score < or = 2 and normal renal, hepatic and bone marrow functions. Dose-limiting toxicities were thrombocytopenia grade II and neutropenia grade III on day 8, febrile neutropenia, and neutropenia lasting > 7 days. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed at the first dose level; at the 135/25 mg m-2 dose level three out of six patients had a DLT which was considered as unacceptable. The only non-haematological toxicity reaching grade III was nausea/vomiting. One patient showed cardiac toxicity. No neurotoxicity and no treatment-related deaths were seen. The maximum tolerated dose of epirubicin and vinorelbine is 135 mg m-2 (day 1) and 25 mg m-2 (days 1 and 8) respectively, causing mainly haematological toxicity. The recommended dose of epirubicin and vinorelbine for phase II studies is found to be 120 mg m-2 and 20 mg m-2 respectively.

New chemotherapy agents in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an update including data from the Seventh World Conference on Lung Cancer

Over the past two decades, modest gains have been made in chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer with the addition of cisplatin-based regimens to the therapeutic armamentarium. Over the last decade, several new agents with significant activity have reached the level of Phase II and III testing. This list of new drugs includes: navelbine, the taxanes--taxol and taxotere, gemcitabine, edatrexate and the camptothecins--irinotecan and topotecan. During this period, oral etoposide and epirubicin were re-investigated and biological agents such as the retinoids, interferons and interleukins were also explored as alternatives to traditional chemotherapy. As these new drug investigations proceeded, basic scientists made important discoveries which are now beginning to be applied to therapy. The future promises to combine these active new drugs with therapies directed against targets unique to non-small cell lung cancer cells.

New drugs in non-small cell lung cancer. An overview

Chemotherapy is rather ineffective in non-small cell lung cancer. However, in the last few years, a number of new anticancer agents have been developed which have definite activity in this disease. Among them are the taxanes and CPT-11, drugs with novel mechanisms of action, new antimetabolites (edatrexate and gemcitabine), and a new vinca alkaloid (vinorelbine). Furthermore, in the near future, the better understanding of lung cancer biology will help in devising new treatment strategies.

Chemotherapy of stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer

Currently, lung cancer is a leading cause of death in men with more than half million new cases diagnosed every year. Eighty percent of these tumors are non-small-cell carcinoma and 70% of these are unresectable or metastatic at the time of presentation, resulting in dramatically poor survival rates. The increasing number of drugs showing a significant activity against non-small-cell lung cancer and the widespread use of modern cisplatin based regimens offer some hope of progress and suggest that chemotherapy may have a role in treating this disease. A recent meta-analysis has confirmed the modest but significant survival benefit for patients treated with combined chemotherapy both in case of metastatic disease and in addition to radiotherapy, in locally advanced disease.

Review of the curative role of radiotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

The present paper is a comprehensive review of available data concerning the role of radiotherapy as an intended curative treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCL). The following issues are reviewed (1) optimal dose, (2) optimal fractionation, (3) optimal treatment planning, (4) clinical results in terms of single treatment and combined treatment with either surgery or chemotherapy. In resectable NSCLC high dose radiotherapy to small localized tumours gives a 5-year survival rate of 7-38%. It is concluded that this treatment modality is appropriate for certain selected patients who refuse to have surgery, who have medical contradications for surgery, or who are of old age. It is discussed whether the treatment should be split course, continuous, hypo-og hyperfraction. A total dose of 55 Gy must be given. CT scanning should be mandatory for optimal planning and therapy. The literature does not give a conclusive answer to whether preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy is indicated. The data indicate that patients with Stage III NSCLC will benefit from a combined treatment modality in terms of chemotherapy based on high dose cisplatinum and radiotherapy. The main conclusion of the review is that many areas with randomized controlled trials are needed in order to answer the critical issue of the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of NSCLS.

Epirubicin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cancer chemotherapy

Epirubicin is the 4' epimer of the anthracycline antibiotic doxorubicin, and has been used alone or in combination with other cytotoxic agents in the treatment of a variety of malignancies. Comparative and noncomparative clinical trials have demonstrated that regimens containing conventional doses of epirubicin achieved equivalent objective response rates and overall median survival as similar doxorubicin-containing regimens in the treatment of advanced and early breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, ovarian cancer, gastric cancer and nonresectable primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Recently, dose-intensive regimens of epirubicin have achieved high response rates in a number of malignancies including early and advanced breast cancer and lung cancer. The major acute dose-limiting toxicity of anthracyclines is myelosuppression. In vitro and clinical studies have shown that, at equimolar doses, epirubicin is less myelotoxic than doxorubicin. The lower haematological toxicity of epirubicin, as well as the recent introduction of supportive measures such as colony-stimulating factors, has allowed dose-intensification of epirubicin-containing regimens, which is particularly significant because of the definite dose-response relationship of anthracyclines. Cardiotoxicity, which is manifested clinically as irreversible congestive heart failure and/or cardiomyopathy, is the most important chronic cumulative dose-limiting toxicity of anthracyclines. Epirubicin has a lower propensity to produce cardiotoxic effects than doxorubicin, and its recommended maximum cumulative dose is almost double that of doxorubicin, thus allowing for more treatment cycles and/or higher doses of epirubicin. In summary, dose-intensive epirubicin-containing regimens, which are feasible due to its lower myelosuppression and cardiotoxicity, have produced high response rates in early breast cancer, a potentially curable malignancy, as well as advanced breast, and lung cancers. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that improved response rates can improve quality of life in some clinical settings, but whether this leads to prolonged survival has not yet been determined. Recently implemented supportive measures such as colony-stimulating factors, prophylactic antimicrobials and peripheral blood stem cell support may help achieve other potential advantages of dose-intensive epirubicin-containing regimens such as reductions in morbidity and length of hospital admissions.

Phase I study of epirubicin plus vinorelbine with or without G-CSF in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The present phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of epirubicin, administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and combined with a conventional dose of vinorelbine [25 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) days 1 and 8] with or without the support of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). 18 patients entered the study. The patients received the following four dose levels of epirubicin (i.v., day 1): 50 mg/m2 (3 patients) and 60 mg/m2 (6 patients) without G-CSF, 75 mg/m2 (3 patients) and 90 mg/m2 (6 patients) with G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg days 4-6 and 9-15). In the patients treated without G-CSF the MTD of epirubicin was 60 mg/m2 and leukopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. In the patients treated with G-CSF the MTD was 90 mg/m2, myelotoxicity being the dose-limiting toxicity. We observed 1/3 partial response (PR) with epirubicin at the dose of 75 mg/m2 and 2/6 PR at 90 mg/m2. These results would indicate the usefulness of a phase II study with epirubicin at the dose of 90 mg/m2 in association with conventional dose of vinorelbine with the support of G-CSF in advanced NSCLC.

Phase II study of high-dose epirubicin and etoposide in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

25 consecutive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with high-dose epirubicin (HDE) 135 mg/m2 and etoposide 60 mg/m2 (days 1-3) every 3 weeks. 121 courses, (median 6, range 1-7), were administered and evaluable for toxicity: WHO grades III/IV leukocytopenia in 60/36 (80%) courses, thrombocytopenia in 18/6 (20%) and grades II/III anaemia in 31/6 (31%). Median (range) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) fell from 63% (53-73, n = 25) to 60% (48-73 n = 16) after 5 courses (P < 0.02). 2 patients had a drop of more than 15% in LVEF with an epirubicin dose of 675 mg/m2. Apart from 1 patient who had tachycardia 6 months after the last course, no patient had congestive heart failure. There were 2 complete and 7 partial responses [total 9/25 (36%, 95% confidence interval: 18-57.5%)]. Median survival is 31.8 (4.3-75) weeks. Combination HDE and etoposide in NSCLC offers no advantage over HDE alone and is more toxic.