1
|
Donhauser T, Gabes M, Özkan E, Masur C, Kamudoni P, Salek S, Abels C, Apfelbacher C. What do Hyperhidrosis Quality of Life Index (HidroQoL©) scores mean? Transferring science into practice by establishing a score banding system. Br J Dermatol 2024; 190:519-526. [PMID: 38015827 DOI: 10.1093/bjd/ljad444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Hyperhidrosis Quality of Life Index (HidroQoL©) is a measure of quality of life (QoL) impacts in hyperhidrosis (HH). OBJECTIVES We aimed to establish score banding systems for the HidroQoL total score for specific contexts representing different severity/impact categories by using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) as anchors, including data from 357 patients from a phase III clinical trial. METHODS We used the HDSS, the established DLQI score bands and two single items (items 5 and 7) of the DLQI as anchors for the creation of banding systems for the HidroQoL. These anchors were chosen via consensus among an expert group according to relevance to patient experience. Due to the distribution of the HDSS and the single DLQI item 7, receiver operating characteristic curves were computed in order to create an optimal cut-off value of the HidroQoL total score. For the DLQI banding system and the single DLQI item 5, we created a banding system for the HidroQoL based on the distribution of their different categories. RESULTS A score of 30 and greater is proposed as the cut-off value for sweating that 'always interferes in daily activities', based on the HDSS as anchor. In terms of overall skin QoL effects, score bands of 0-6, 7-18, 19-25, 26-32 and 33-36 represent 'no effect', 'small effect', 'moderate effect', 'very large effect' and 'extremely large effect' on the patient's life, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we propose different banding systems for four different contexts: skin-specific QoL (DLQI banding), HH severity (HDSS), working and studying (single DLQI item 7) and social and leisure activities (single DLQI item 5). These banding systems and cut-off values can be used in clinical research and practice to place the patients in different severity categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Donhauser
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michaela Gabes
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Ebru Özkan
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Clarissa Masur
- Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, UK
- Institute of Medicines Development, Cardiff, UK
| | - Christoph Abels
- Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Christian Apfelbacher
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vyas J, Johns JR, Ali FM, Singh RK, Ingram JR, Salek S, Finlay AY. A systematic review of 454 randomized controlled trials using the Dermatology Life Quality Index: experience in 69 diseases and 43 countries. Br J Dermatol 2024; 190:315-339. [PMID: 36971254 DOI: 10.1093/bjd/ljad079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over 29 years of clinical application, the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) has remained the most used patient-reported outcome (PRO) in dermatology due to its robustness, simplicity and ease of use. OBJECTIVES To generate further evidence of the DLQI's utility in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and to cover all diseases and interventions. METHODS The methodology followed PRISMA guidelines and included seven bibliographical databases, searching articles published from 1 January 1994 until 16 November 2021. Articles were reviewed independently by two assessors, and an adjudicator resolved any opinion differences. RESULTS Of 3220 screened publications, 454 articles meeting the eligibility criteria for inclusion, describing research on 198 190 patients, were analysed. DLQI scores were primary endpoints in 24 (5.3%) of studies. Most studies were of psoriasis (54.1%), although 69 different diseases were studied. Most study drugs were systemic (85.1%), with biologics comprising 55.9% of all pharmacological interventions. Topical treatments comprised 17.0% of total pharmacological interventions. Nonpharmacological interventions, mainly laser therapy and ultraviolet radiation treatment, comprised 12.2% of the total number of interventions. The majority of studies (63.7%) were multicentric, with trials conducted in at least 42 different countries; 40.2% were conducted in multiple countries. The minimal clinically importance difference (MCID) was reported in the analysis of 15.0% of studies, but only 1.3% considered full score meaning banding of the DLQI. Forty-seven (10.4%) of the studies investigated statistical correlation of the DLQI with clinical severity assessment or other PRO/quality of life tools; and 61-86% of studies had within-group scores differences greater than the MCID in 'active treatment arms'. The Jadad risk-of-bias scale showed that bias was generally low, as 91.8% of the studies had Jadad scores of ≥ 3; only 0.4% of studies showed a high risk of bias from randomization. Thirteen per cent had a high risk of bias from blinding and 10.1% had a high risk of bias from unknown outcomes of all participants in the studies. In 18.5% of the studies the authors declared that they followed an intention-to-treat protocol; imputation for missing DLQI data was used in 34.4% of studies. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review provides a wealth of evidence of the use of the DLQI in clinical trials to inform researchers' and -clinicians' decisions for its further use. Recommendations are also made for improving the reporting of data from future RCTs using the DLQI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeffrey R Johns
- Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Faraz M Ali
- Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Ravinder K Singh
- Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - John R Ingram
- Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Andrew Y Finlay
- Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kamudoni P, Johns J, Cook KF, Salem R, Salek S, Raab J, Middleton R, Henke C, Amtmann D. Measuring fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis - which questionnaire should be used? A Plain Language Summary of Publication. Neurodegener Dis Manag 2024; 14:5-9. [PMID: 38501760 DOI: 10.2217/nmt-2023-0034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT? This summary explains the findings of a recent study that compared different questionnaires used by doctors to measure levels of fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of the study was to find out which questionnaire doctors should use to measure fatigue in people with MS in the future. Fatigue, which can be described as the overwhelming feeling of tiredness or exhaustion, is a very common symptom of MS. For the majority of people with MS, fatigue is one of the worst symptoms of MS, so it is essential that doctors can measure it accurately. Currently, people with MS are asked to complete questionnaires so that their care team can see the effect of fatigue on their day-to-day lives. There are many questionnaires that are used to measure fatigue in people with MS. It would be valuable to come to an agreement, based on evidence from research like this study, on which questionnaire is the most appropriate for measuring fatigue in both research and healthcare settings. This study compared a questionnaire called the PROMIS® Fatigue (MS) 8a, referred to throughout this summary as the PROMIS® MS Fatigue Short Form, with two of the most commonly used questionnaires: the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). The questionnaires were compared to see which one should be recommended to doctors for measuring fatigue in people with MS. WHAT ARE THE KEY TAKEAWAYS? It was found that while all three questionnaires were good, the PROMIS® MS Fatigue Short Form questionnaire was better than the other two questionnaires at showing differences in levels of fatigue between people with MS. The PROMIS® MS Fatigue Short Form was also found to be better than the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) at showing changes in the person with MS's level of fatigue. The PROMIS® MS Fatigue Short Form questionnaire may help people with MS to better communicate challenges with their fatigue to their doctors. WHAT WAS THE MAIN CONCLUSION REPORTED BY THE RESEARCHERS? The study suggests that the PROMIS® MS Fatigue Short Form questionnaire is a helpful tool for doctors and people with MS to measure fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Kamudoni
- Global Evidence & Value Development - R&D, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | | | | | - Rana Salem
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Sam Salek
- Institute of Medicines Development, Cardiff, UK
- School of Life & Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Jana Raab
- Global Evidence & Value Development - R&D, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Rod Middleton
- UK MS Register, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
| | - Christian Henke
- Global Evidence & Value Development - R&D, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Dagmar Amtmann
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Laane E, Salek S, Oliva EN, Bennink C, Clavreul S, Richardson PG, Scheid C, Weisel K, Ionova T. Guidelines for the Use and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma Clinical Trials. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5764. [PMID: 38136310 PMCID: PMC10741926 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
In the era of personalized medicine there is an increasing need for the assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to become a standard of patient care. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) are important in assessing significant and meaningful changes as a result of an intervention based on a patient's own perspective. It is well established that active multiple myeloma (MM) can be characterized by a high burden of disease and treatment-related symptoms, with considerable worsening of quality of life (QoL). In general, and over the past decade, the focus has shifted to obtaining the most durable remissions with the best QoL as primary goals for MM treatment. Patients place considerable value on their QoL and communicating about QoL data prior to treatment decisions allows them to make informed treatment choices. Consequently, optimization of QoL of patients with MM is an important therapeutic goal and the incorporation of PROs into clinical trials has the potential of improving treatment outcomes. In this regard, guidance for the use and reporting of PROMs in MM in clinical trials is warranted. Under the auspices of the European Hematology Association, evidence-based guidelines for the use and reporting of PROs in patients with MM have been developed according to the EHA's core Guidelines Development Methodology. This document provides general considerations for the choice of PROMs in MM clinical trials as well as a series of recommendations covering a selection of PROMs in MM clinical trials; the mode of administration; timing of assessments; strategies to minimize missing data; sample size calculation; reporting of results; and interpretation of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Laane
- Hematology-Oncology Clinic, Tartu University, 50406 Tartu, Estonia
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK;
| | - Esther Natalie Oliva
- U.O.C. Ematologia, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi Melacrino Morelli, 89124 Reggio di Calabria, Italy;
| | - Christine Bennink
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | | | - Paul G Richardson
- Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA;
| | - Christof Scheid
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Katja Weisel
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Tatyana Ionova
- Quality of Life Unit, Saint Petersburg State University Hospital, 190103 Saint Petersburg, Russia;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ngum N, Ndomondo-Sigonda M, Walker S, Salek S. Regional regulatory harmonisation initiatives: Their potential contribution to the newly established African Medicines Agency. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2023; 145:105497. [PMID: 37778434 DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Key regulatory entities can serve as building blocks for the African Medicines Agency (AMA). The aim of this study is to demonstrate how the regional medicines regulatory harmonisation programmes could contribute to AMA's effectiveness and efficiency. METHODS A literature search was conducted using key words to identify publications about the AMA, African Medicines Regulatory Harmonisation (AMRH) and East African Community Medicines Regulatory Harmonisation programmes (EAC-MRH) from 2009 to 2023. The EAC-MRH programme experience was used to highlight the benefits and challenges of African regulatory harmonisation. RESULTS As the foundation for the AMA, the AMRH has established structures and workstreams to support its operationalisation, including 10 Technical Committees (TCs) and 5 Regional Economic Committees (RECs). Lessons learned from the EAC-MRH 10-year experience are being used to scale up regulatory harmonisation and could be of value to AMA harmonisation experience. CONCLUSIONS As of June 2023, 35 of 55 countries have either signed and/or ratified the AMA Treaty, whilst 20 have neither signed nor ratified it. An effective AMA will need strong National Medicines Regulatory Authorities as well as Regional programmes and it is imperative for more well-resourced countries to ratify the treaty to ensure access to essential medical products and technologies for the African people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Ngum
- Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom; African Union Development Agency - New Partnership for Africa's Development (AUDA-NEPAD), Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Margareth Ndomondo-Sigonda
- African Union Development Agency - New Partnership for Africa's Development (AUDA-NEPAD), Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Stuart Walker
- Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom; Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Salek
- Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom; Institute of Medicines Development, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Andrae DA, Grace RF, Jewett A, Foster B, Klaassen RJ, Salek S, Li J, Tai F, Boscoe AN, Zagadailov E. Psychometric validation of the Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Diary and Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Impact Assessment in adults in the phase 3 ACTIVATE trial. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023; 7:112. [PMID: 37943362 PMCID: PMC10636000 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00650-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pyruvate kinase (PK) deficiency is a rare hereditary disorder characterized by chronic hemolytic anemia and serious sequalae which negatively affect patient quality of life. This study aimed to psychometrically validate the first disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments: the 7-item PK Deficiency Diary (PKDD) and 12-item PK Deficiency Impact Assessment (PKDIA), designed to assess signs, symptoms, and impacts of PK deficiency in patients enrolled in the ACTIVATE global phase 3 study of mitapivat versus placebo (NCT03548220). METHODS All validation analyses for the PKDD and PKDIA were performed on blinded data, with analyses on item integrity, scoring, reliability, and validity conducted on data from screening and baseline. Completion rates and baseline response distributions were characterized using descriptive statistics. Item response modelling was used to inform a weighted scoring system. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency and test-retest reliability; and validity by convergent and known-groups analyses. RESULTS Of the 80 adults enrolled, baseline data were available for 77 (96.3%) and 78 (97.5%) patients for the PKDD and PKDIA, respectively. Item responses skewed right, indicating that mean values exceeded median values, especially for items utilizing a 0-10 numeric scale, which were subsequently recoded to a 0-4 scale; 4 items were removed from the PKDIA due to redundancy or low relevance to the trial population. Both the PKDD and PKDIA demonstrated high internal consistency (McDonald's coefficient ω = 0.86 and 0.90, respectively), test-retest reliability (intra-class coefficients of 0.94 and 0.87, respectively), and convergent validity with other PROs (linear correlation coefficients [|r|] between 0.30-0.73 and 0.50-0.82, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The findings provide evidence of validity and reliability for the PKDD and PKDIA, the first disease-specific PRO measures for PK deficiency, and can therefore increase understanding of, and more accurately capture, the wider impact of PK deficiency on health-related quality of life. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03548220. Registered June 07, 2018; https://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov/ct2/show/NCT03548220 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rachael F Grace
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Robert J Klaassen
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Junlong Li
- Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 88 Sidney Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139-4169, USA
| | - Feng Tai
- Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 88 Sidney Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139-4169, USA
| | - Audra N Boscoe
- Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 88 Sidney Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139-4169, USA.
| | - Erin Zagadailov
- Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 88 Sidney Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139-4169, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Danks L, Semete-Makokotlela B, Otwombe K, Parag Y, Walker S, Salek S. Evaluation of the impact of reliance on the regulatory performance in the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority: implications for African regulatory authorities. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1265058. [PMID: 37937144 PMCID: PMC10626996 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1265058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) advocates the use of reliance practices to enable national regulatory authorities (NRAs) to improve patients' access to medicines. This study considered whether reliance review translates into swifter medicine authorization. Methods Abridged review outcomes were examined for New Chemical Entity (NCE) and generic applications to the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) in Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) and clinical/bioequivalence (BE), as well as overall NCE authorization times. Results SAHPRA NCE CMC review time was 91 days (abridged) vs. 179 days (full), applicant response time was 34 vs. 105 days, respectively, and there was a >2-fold time reduction for abridged vs. full CMC review (125 vs. 284 days). There was a 99-day decrease in clinical approval time through an abridged review (230 vs. 329 days) and a decrease in marketing authorization time for NCE abridged assessment (446 vs. 619 days). SAHPRA review time for generic applications was 97 days (abridged) vs. 191 days (full); applicant response time was 26 days (abridged) vs. 81 days (full) and there was a >2-fold time reduction for CMC and BE abridged vs. full review (122 vs. 272 days). Conclusion These results clearly support World Health Organization recommendations for the use of reliance-based regulatory review to expedite the worldwide availability of safe, effective and needed medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorraine Danks
- South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA), Pretoria, South Africa
| | | | - Kennedy Otwombe
- Perinatal HIV Research Unit, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Yashmika Parag
- South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA), Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Stuart Walker
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, United Kingdom
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Institute for Medicines Development, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chan SHY, Khatib Y, Webley S, Layton D, Salek S. Identification of cardiotoxicity related to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatments: A systematic review. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1137983. [PMID: 37383708 PMCID: PMC10294714 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1137983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: In the last few decades, there has been a rapid development in cancer therapies and improved detection strategies, hence the death rates caused by cancer have decreased. However, it has been reported that cardiovascular disease has become the second leading cause of long-term morbidity and fatality among cancer survivors. Cardiotoxicity from anticancer drugs affects the heart's function and structure and can occur during any stage of the cancer treatments, which leads to the development of cardiovascular disease. Objectives: To investigate the association between anticancer drugs for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and cardiotoxicity as to whether: different classes of anticancer drugs demonstrate different cardiotoxicity potentials; different dosages of the same drug in initial treatment affect the degree of cardiotoxicity; and accumulated dosage and/or duration of treatments affect the degree of cardiotoxicity. Methods: This systematic review included studies involving patients over 18 years old with NSCLC and excluded studies in which patients' treatments involve radiotherapy only. Electronic databases and registers including Cochrane Library, National Cancer Institute (NCI) Database, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and the European Union Clinical Trials Register were systematically searched from the earliest available date up until November 2020. A full version protocol of this systematic review (CRD42020191760) had been published on PROSPERO. Results: A total of 1785 records were identified using specific search terms through the databases and registers; 74 eligible studies were included for data extraction. Based on data extracted from the included studies, anticancer drugs for NSCLC that are associated with cardiovascular events include bevacizumab, carboplatin, cisplatin, crizotinib, docetaxel, erlotinib, gemcitabine and paclitaxel. Hypertension was the most reported cardiotoxicity as 30 studies documented this cardiovascular adverse event. Other reported treatment-related cardiotoxicities include arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, cardiac arrest, cardiac failure, coronary artery disease, heart failure, ischemia, left ventricular dysfunction, myocardial infarction, palpitations, and tachycardia. Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review have provided a better understanding of the possible association between cardiotoxicities and anticancer drugs for NSCLC. Whilst variation is observed across different drug classes, the lack of information available on cardiac monitoring can result in underestimation of this association. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020191760, identifier PROSPERO CRD42020191760.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Ho Yi Chan
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Yasmin Khatib
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Sherael Webley
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Deborah Layton
- IQVIA UK, London, United Kingdom
- PEPI Consultancy Limited, Southampton, United Kingdom
- University of Keele, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Donhauser T, Apfelbacher C, Kann G, Masur C, Kamudoni P, Salek S, Abels C, Gabes M. Hyperhidrosis quality of life index (HidroQoL): further validation by applying classical test theory and item response theory using data from a phase III clinical trial. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023; 7:55. [PMID: 37280417 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00596-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Hyperhidrosis Quality of Life Index (HidroQoL ©) is a well-developed and validated patient-reported outcome measure assessing the quality-of-life impacts in hyperhidrosis with 18 items. Our aim was to extend the already existing validity evidence for the HidroQoL, especially in relation to structural validity. Especially Rasch analysis has not been applied to the final 18-item HidroQoL before. METHODS Data from a phase III clinical trial were used. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to confirm the two a priori HidroQoL scales within classical test theory. Furthermore, the assumptions of the Rasch model (model fit, monotonicity, unidimensionality, local independence) and Differential Item Functioning (DIF) were assessed using item response theory. RESULTS The sample included 529 patients with severe primary axillary hyperhidrosis. The two-factor structure could be confirmed by the confirmatory factor analysis (SRMR = 0.058). The item characteristic curves showed mainly optimally functioning response categories, indicating monotonicity. The overall fit to the Rasch model was adequate and unidimensionality for the HidroQoL overall scale could be confirmed, since the first factor had an eigenvalue of 2.244 and accounted for 18.7%. Local independence was below assumed thresholds (residual correlations ≤ 0.26). DIF analysis, controlling for age or gender, was critical for four and three items, respectively. However, this DIF could be explained. CONCLUSION Using classical test theory and item response theory/Rasch analyses, this study provided further evidence for the structural validity of the HidroQoL. This study confirmed several specific (measurement) properties of the HidroQoL questionnaire in patients with physician-confirmed severe primary axillary hyperhidrosis: the HidroQoL is a unidimensional scale allowing the summation of scores to generate a single score, and simultaneously it has a dual structure, also allowing the calculation of separate domain scores for daily activities and psychosocial impacts. With this study, we provided new evidence of the structural validity of the HidroQoL in the context of a clinical trial. Trial registration The study was registered (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03658616, 05 September 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03658616?term=NCT03658616&draw=2&rank=1 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Donhauser
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
- University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christian Apfelbacher
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - Gesina Kann
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
- University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Clarissa Masur
- Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK
- Institute of Medicines Development, Cardiff, UK
| | - Christoph Abels
- Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Michaela Gabes
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Owusu-Asante M, Darko DM, Walker S, Salek S. Assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of the economic community of West African States Medicines Regulatory Harmonization initiative by the pharmaceutical industry. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1184108. [PMID: 37229251 PMCID: PMC10203491 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1184108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Following the establishment of Economic Community of West African States Medicines Regulatory Harmonization (ECOWAS-MRH) initiative in 2017, it was considered timely to carry out an evaluation of the current status of the initiative's operating model by the pharmaceutical industry users. This study examined the challenges being encountered and identified strategies that would strengthen the ECOWAS-MRH initiative moving forward. Methods: The Process Effectiveness and Efficiency Rating (PEER) questionnaire was used to collect data from manufacturers who have submitted applications to the joint assessment procedure and had identified recommendations for improving the performance of the ECOWAS-MRH initiative. Results: Ten pharmaceutical manufacturer participants (innovator, generic foreign, generic local) all reported that harmonisation of registration requirements was a major benefit, allowing submission of the same dossier to multiple countries, reducing the application burden and saving time and resources. Additionally, receipt of the same list of questions from several countries enables the compilation of a single response package, resulting in shorter timelines for approvals compared to the individualised country responses. Another benefit of a harmonised registration process was the simultaneous accessibility of medicines in various markets. Key challenges included a lack of centralised submission and tracking, differences in regulatory performance of the national medical regulatory authorities, a lack of detailed information for applicants and a low motivation to use the ECOWAS-MRH route with a preference for other regulatory pathways in the ECOWAS member states. Conclusion: This study identified several approaches to increase the effectiveness of this initiative: the implementation of risk-based approaches such as use of reliance pathways; establishment of a robust information technology systems, building assessor capacity to facilitate processing and monitoring applications; and priority review of ECOWAS-MRH products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mercy Owusu-Asante
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Food and Drugs Authority, Accra, Ghana
| | | | - Stuart Walker
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Institute of Medicines Development, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ly NF, Flach C, Lysen TS, Markov E, van Ballegooijen H, Rijnbeek P, Duarte-Salles T, Reyes C, John LH, Karimi L, Reich C, Salek S, Layton D. Impact of European Union Label Changes for Fluoroquinolone-Containing Medicinal Products for Systemic and Inhalation Use: Post-Referral Prescribing Trends. Drug Saf 2023; 46:405-416. [PMID: 36976448 PMCID: PMC10044099 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01286-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Concerns of the persistence and severity of the adverse effects of fluoroquinolones, mainly involving the nervous system, muscles and joints, resulted in the 2018 referral procedure led by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). They advised to stop prescribing fluoroquinolones for infections of mild severity or of a presumed self-limiting course and for prevention of infections, plus to restrict prescriptions in cases of milder infections where other treatment options are available, and restrict in at-risk populations. We aimed to examine whether the impact of EMA regulatory interventions implemented throughout 2018-2019 had an impact on fluoroquinolone prescribing rates. METHODS A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using electronic health care records from six European countries between 2016 and 2021. We analysed monthly incident fluoroquinolone use rates overall and for each fluoroquinolone active substance through flexible modelling via segmented regression to detect time points of trend changes, in monthly percentage change (MPC). RESULTS The incidence of fluoroquinolone use ranged from 0.7 to 8.0/1000 persons per month over all calendar years. While changes in fluoroquinolone prescriptions were observed over time across countries, these were inconsistent and did not seem to be temporally related to EMA interventions (e.g., Belgium: February/May 2018, MPC - 33.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 35.9 to - 30.7; Germany: February/May 2019, MPC - 12.6%, 95% CI - 13.7 to - 11.6]; UK: January/April 2016, MPC - 4.9%, 95% CI - 6.2 to - 3.6). CONCLUSION The regulatory action associated with the 2018 referral did not seem to have relevant effects on fluoroquinolone prescribing in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Thom S Lysen
- IQVIA Solutions B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Peter Rijnbeek
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Talita Duarte-Salles
- Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlen Reyes
- Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luis H John
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leila Karimi
- IQVIA Solutions B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Science, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Deborah Layton
- PEPI Consultancy Limited, Southampton, UK
- University of Keele, Keele, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mashingia J, Ngum N, Ndomondo-Sigonda M, Kermad A, Bujar M, Salek S, Walker S. Regulatory performance of the East African Community joint assessment procedure: The way forward for regulatory systems strengthening. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2023; 140:105383. [PMID: 36933643 DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Seven national medicines regulatory authorities in the East African Community (EAC) have embraced regulatory reliance, harmonization and work sharing through the EAC Medicines Regulatory Harmonization programme. Measuring the performance of regulatory systems provides key baseline information to build on regulatory system-strengthening strategies. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the regulatory performance of the EAC joint scientific assessment of applications approved between 2018 and 2021. METHODS Utilising a data metrics tool, information was collected reflecting timelines for various milestones including submission to screening, scientific assessment and communication of regional recommendations for biologicals and pharmaceuticals that received a positive regional recommendation for product registration from 2018 to 2021. RESULTS Several challenges as well as possible solutions were identified, including median overall approval times exceeding the EAC 465-day target and median times to issue marketing authorisation following EAC joint assessment recommendation that far exceeded the 116-day target. Recommendations included establishment of an integrated information management system and automation of the capture of regulatory timelines through the EAC metric tool. CONCLUSIONS Despite initiative progress, work is required to improve the EAC joint regulatory procedure to achieve regulatory systems-strengthening and ensure patients' timely access to safe, efficacious and quality medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nancy Ngum
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; African Union Development Agency- New Partnership for Africa's Development (AUDA-NEPAD), Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Margareth Ndomondo-Sigonda
- African Union Development Agency- New Partnership for Africa's Development (AUDA-NEPAD), Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Adem Kermad
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Magda Bujar
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; Institute for Medicines Development, United Kingdom.
| | - Stuart Walker
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Verma S, Alamuddin N, Alawadi F, Alkandari H, Al Mahmeed W, Assaad-Khalil SH, Haddad J, Husemoen LLN, Lombard L, Malik RA, Mashaki Ceyhan E, Sabbour H, Tombak G, Yadav G, Salek S. Prevalence of Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk in the Middle East and Africa: Primary Results of the PACT-MEA Study. Circulation 2023; 147:1251-1255. [PMID: 36877670 PMCID: PMC10101130 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.123.064345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Subodh Verma
- St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Naji Alamuddin
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Bahrain, King Hamad University Hospital, Bahrain
| | - Fatheya Alawadi
- Endocrine Department, Dubai Hospital, Dubai Health Authority (DHA), United Arab Emirates
| | - Hessa Alkandari
- Department of Pediatrics, Farwaniya Hospital; Department of Population Health, Dasman Diabetes Institute, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Wael Al Mahmeed
- Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Samir H Assaad-Khalil
- Unit of Diabetes, Lipidology & Metabolism; Department of Internal Medicine, Alexandria Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Jihad Haddad
- Endocrinology Section, Bader Medical Complex, Amman, Jordan, JORDAN
| | | | - Landman Lombard
- Principal Investigator, Cape Town Medical Research Centre, Cape Town South Africa
| | - Rayaz A Malik
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Education City, Doha, Qatar
| | | | - Hani Sabbour
- Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Gourav Yadav
- Novo Nordisk Saglik Urunleri Tic. Ltd. Sti. Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, and Institute of Medicines Development, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Verma S, Sabbour H, Alamuddin N, Alawadi F, Alkandari H, Almahmeed W, Assaad-Khalil SH, Haddad J, Lombard L, Malik RA, Mashaki Ceyhan E, Prasad P, Tombak G, Salek S. A cross-sectional study of the prevalence and clinical management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in patients with type 2 diabetes across the Middle East and Africa (PACT-MEA): Study design and rationale. Diabetes Obes Metab 2023; 25:1444-1452. [PMID: 36775980 DOI: 10.1111/dom.15011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
AIM To investigate the epidemiology and clinical management of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (eASCVD) or high/very high ASCVD risk, defined by the 2021 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines, in seven countries in the Middle East and Africa (PACT-MEA; NCT05317845), and to assess physicians' attitudes and the basis for their decision-making in the management of these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS PACT-MEA is a cross-sectional, observational study undertaken in Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, South Africa and the United Arab Emirates based on a medical chart review of approximately 3700 patients with T2D in primary and secondary care settings, and a survey of approximately 400 physicians treating patients with T2D. RESULTS The primary and secondary objectives are to determine the prevalence of eASCVD and high/very high ASCVD risk in patients with T2D. Current treatment with cardioprotective antidiabetic medication, the proportion of patients meeting the treatment criteria for reimbursement in the study countries where there is an applicable reimbursement guideline, and physician-reported factors in clinical decision-making in T2D management, will also be assessed. CONCLUSIONS This large cross-sectional study will establish the estimated prevalence and management of eASCVD and high/very high ASCVD risk in patients with type 2 diabetes across the Middle East and Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subodh Verma
- St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hani Sabbour
- Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Naji Alamuddin
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland-Bahrain, King Hamad University Hospital, Adliya, Bahrain
| | - Fatheya Alawadi
- Department of Endocrinology, Dubai Hospital, Dubai Health Authority (DHA), Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Hessa Alkandari
- Department of Pediatrics, Farwaniya Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
- Department of Population Health, Dasman Diabetes Institute, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Wael Almahmeed
- Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Samir H Assaad-Khalil
- Unit of Diabetes, Lipidology and Metabolism, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
- Department of Internal Medicine/Alexandria Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Jihad Haddad
- Endocrinology Section, Bader Medical Complex, Amman, Jordan
| | | | - Rayaz A Malik
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar
| | | | | | | | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
- Institute for Medicines Development, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pemberton-Whiteley Z, Nier S, Geissler J, Wintrich S, Verhoeven B, Christensen RO, Salek S, Oliva EN, Ionova T, Bradley J. Understanding Quality of Life in Patients With Acute Leukemia, a Global Survey. J Patient Cent Res Rev 2023; 10:21-30. [PMID: 36714002 PMCID: PMC9851391 DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The Acute Leukemia Advocates Network (ALAN) sought to determine which factors are most associated with poor quality of life (QoL) in patients with acute leukemia and to determine key issues and unmet needs through administration of an online survey distributed worldwide via partner patient organizations. Methods ALAN developed a questionnaire informed by literature review and based extensively on the hematological malignancy-specific patient-reported outcomes (HM-PRO) measure to assess the impact of acute leukemia on QoL and its relationships with patients' demographics, disease state, disease impact, and support from health care professionals. Univariate and multivariable statistical analysis was used to investigate relationships between HM-PRO scores and the other factors. Results Of 552 respondents from 42 countries, 332 had acute myeloid leukemia, 139 had acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and 81 had acute promyelocytic leukemia (survey data collected in 2019). Younger age, female gender, and lower income were all significantly negatively associated with QoL. Weak or moderate correlations were observed between overall support, management, and impact of treatment and diagnosis of acute leukemia. Feeling isolated and having reduced ability to carry out physical or enjoyable activities were the most important individual factors, while the best predictors for QoL impact were age, gender, and income (model r2=0.16, complete case n=449). Conclusions Findings indicated key factors, particularly age, gender, and socioeconomic state, that clinicians responsible for the care of patients with acute leukemia should be aware of when designing support strategies. The importance of social functioning in relation to patient QoL also should be included in considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zack Pemberton-Whiteley
- Acute Leukemia Advocates Network (ALAN), Bern, Switzerland,Leukaemia Care, Worcester, United Kingdom
| | - Samantha Nier
- Acute Leukemia Advocates Network (ALAN), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jan Geissler
- Acute Leukemia Advocates Network (ALAN), Bern, Switzerland,LeukaNET e.V., Riemerling, Germany
| | - Sophie Wintrich
- Acute Leukemia Advocates Network (ALAN), Bern, Switzerland,MDS UK Patient Support Group, United Kingdom
| | - Bregje Verhoeven
- Acute Leukemia Advocates Network (ALAN), Bern, Switzerland,Foundation Hematon, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Rita O. Christensen
- Acute Leukemia Advocates Network (ALAN), Bern, Switzerland,LyLe Patientforeningenen for Lymfekræft Leukæmi og MDS, Sealand Region, Denmark
| | - Sam Salek
- University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Esther Natalie Oliva
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliera Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Tatyana Ionova
- National Medical Surgical Centre and Multinational Centre for Quality of Life Research, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Jennie Bradley
- Quality Health Ltd, an IQVIA company, Derbyshire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Owusu-Asante M, Darko DM, Asamoah-Okyere KD, Asante-Boateng S, Kermad A, Walker S, Salek S. Evaluation of the Food and Drugs Authority, Ghana Regulatory Review Process: Challenges and Opportunities. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2023; 57:372-385. [PMID: 36352343 PMCID: PMC9646276 DOI: 10.1007/s43441-022-00478-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the current regulatory review process of the food and drugs authority (FDA) Ghana by identifying key milestones, target timelines, good review practices and quality decision-making practices and evaluating the overall regulatory performance from 2019 to 2021, as well as the challenges and opportunities for improvement. METHODS The FDA Ghana representatives completed the optimising efficiencies in regulatory agencies (OpERA) questionnaire, including data identifying the milestones and overall approval times for all products registered by the FDA Ghana from 2019 to 2021. RESULTS Of the new active substances approved from 2019 to 2021, 91% were biologicals processed by full or abridged reviews pathways. Timelines for these reviews were within authority targets but were longer compared with generics. Of generics approved from 2019 to 2021, 97% were pharmaceuticals processed by the full review pathway, with timelines within authority targets and shorter compared with new active substances. Regardless of the review model used, approval times for new active substances increased from 84 to 355 calendar days 2019-2021 due to the impact of the pandemic. Guidelines, standard operating procedures and review templates were in place and the majority of indicators for good review practices were implemented. Several quality decision-making practices were implemented, although currently there is not a systematic structured approach. CONCLUSION The FDA Ghana monitors regulatory performance and currently meets its target timelines. To achieve World Health Organization Maturity Level 4 status, an electronic tracking system, benefit-risk assessment framework and template and the publication of assessment reports are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mercy Owusu-Asante
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
- Food and Drugs Authority, Accra, Ghana
| | | | | | | | - Adem Kermad
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, 70, St Mary Axe, London, EC3A 8BE, UK
| | - Stuart Walker
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, 70, St Mary Axe, London, EC3A 8BE, UK.
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
- Institute of Medicines Development, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Salek S, Ionova T, Oliva EN, Andreas M, Skoetz N, Kreuzberger N, Laane E. The Reporting, Use, and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Literature Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14236007. [PMID: 36497488 PMCID: PMC9741479 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14236007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are becoming increasingly important in supporting clinical outcomes in clinical trials. In multiple myeloma (MM), PRO measurement is useful to reveal how treatment affects physical, psychosocial, and functional behaviour as well as symptoms and treatment-related adverse events to evaluate the benefit-risk ratio of a particular drug or drug combination. We report the types of PRO instruments used in MM, the frequency in which they are utilised in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and the consistency of their reporting. METHODS The European Hematology Association (EHA) supports the development of guidelines for the use of PROs in adult patients with haematological malignancies. The first step is the present systematic review of the literature. MEDLINE and CENTRAL were searched for RCTs in MM between 2015 and 2020. Study design, characteristics of MM and its treatment, the primary outcomes, and the types of PRO instrument(s) were extracted using a predefined template. Additionally, in a stepwise approach, it was assessed whether the identified instruments had been validated for multiple myeloma patients, patients with haematological malignancies, or cancer patients. RESULTS Following screening for RCTs, 283 studies were included for review from 10,707 records retrieved, and 118 of these planned the use of PRO measures. Thirty-eight PRO instruments were reported. The most frequently used instrument (92 studies) was the EORTC QLQ-30. The EORTC-MY20 MM-specific questionnaire was the second most frequently used (50 studies), together with the EQ-5D (50 studies). Only 19 PRO instruments reported were consistent with the trial registry. Furthermore, in 58 publications, the information on PRO instruments differed between the publication and the trial registry. Further, information on PRO in HTA reports was available for 26 studies, of which 18 reports were consistent with the trial registries. Out of the 38 instruments used, six had been validated for patients with multiple myeloma (the most frequently used), six for patients with haematological malignancies, and 10 for cancer patients in general. CONCLUSIONS The findings indicate that the measurement of PROs in RCTs for MM is underutilised, underreported, and often inconsistent. Guidelines for the appropriate use of PROs in MM are needed to ensure standardisation in selection and reporting. Furthermore, not all PRO instruments identified have been validated for myeloma patients or patients with haematological malignancies. Thus, guidelines for the appropriate use and reporting of PROs are needed in MM to ensure standardisation in the selection and reporting of PROs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK
- Correspondence:
| | - Tatiana Ionova
- Quality of Life Monitoring Department, Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital, 190103 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Esther Natalie Oliva
- Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi Melacrino Morelli, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Marike Andreas
- Evidence-Based Medicine, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Nicole Skoetz
- Evidence-Based Medicine, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Nina Kreuzberger
- Evidence-Based Medicine, Department I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Edward Laane
- Hematology-Oncology Clinic, Tartu University, 50406 Tartu, Estonia
- Kuressaare Hospital, 93815 Kuressaare, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Owusu-Asante M, Darko DM, Walker S, Salek S. Assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of the West Africa medicines regulatory harmonization initiative by the member countries. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:1069345. [PMID: 36506579 PMCID: PMC9732020 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1069345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The West Africa Health Organization launched the West Africa Medicines Regulatory Harmonization Project (WA-MRH) in 2017 with the overarching objective to improve the availability of high-quality, safe and effective medicines and vaccines by the 15 countries in the Economic Community of West African States region. Although this project has made significant progress towards the realisation of its goals, challenges still remain. The aims of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the WA-MRH, examine what challenges are being encountered and identify strategies that would strengthen the process for realising the initiative's goals. Methods: The Process Effectiveness and Efficiency Rating (PEER) questionnaire was used to collect data from assessors representing the seven active NMRAs in the joint assessment procedure that identified the benefits, challenges and recommendations for improving the performance of the WA-MRH project. Results: The benefits of the joint assessment procedure include time savings to manufacturers resulting from submitting one dossier and the same response package to multiple countries resulting in access to the multiple African markets within the same timeframe. Additionally, some of the NMRAs have been able to strengthen their technical capacity as a result of this initiative. Key challenges to the project include the lack of a robust information technology system that would enable dossier tracking and constraints in human resources needed to support dossier submissions and the assessment process. Conclusion: This study identified the strengths of the WA-MRH initiative as well as strategies for improvement and achievement of its objectives. The centralised submission of a dossier and its tracking is key to the regulatory assessment process. This research has demonstrated that amongst other considerations, a robust information technology system, coupled with the necessary human resource capacity would greatly enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the WA-MRH initiative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mercy Owusu-Asante
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom,Food and Drugs Authority, Accra, Ghana
| | | | - Stuart Walker
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom,Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom,Institute of Medicines Development, Cardiff, United Kingdom,*Correspondence: Sam Salek,
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ngum N, Mashingia J, Ndomondo-Sigonda M, Walker S, Salek S. Evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of the East African community joint assessment procedure by pharmaceutical companies: Opportunities for improvement. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:1031289. [PMID: 36408267 PMCID: PMC9669603 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1031289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: A 2021 study to determine the viewpoints among the seven member countries regarding the effectiveness (i.e., achieving the intended outcomes) and efficiency (i.e., achieving the intended outcomes in timely manner with the resources available) of the East African Community Medicine Regulatory Harmonisation (EAC-MRH) Joint Assessment Procedure recommended the conduct of a similar study among pharmaceutical company applicants. The aim of this study then was to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the current EAC-MRH operating model from the applicants' perspective, including the challenges and opportunities for improvement. Methods: Using the Process Effectiveness and Efficiency Rating for Industry questionnaire developed by the authors, data were collected from company representatives responsible for EAC joint procedure submissions. Results: Responses from 14 study participants underlined the support of pharmaceutical companies for the EAC-MRH initiative, which has facilitated the harmonisation of registration requirements across the EAC region leading to one registration for all countries and a reduction of the workload for both applicants and assessors. In addition, it is expected that shorter timelines for approval will lead to improved access to quality-assured essential medicines in the region. Access to various markets at the same time was also noted as an important benefit to pharmaceutical companies. Noted challenges include a lack of process information, a lack of centralised submission and tracking process and a lack of mandated central registration. A key strategy proposed by participants is the establishment of a regional administrative body to centrally receive and track EAC applications and the eventual establishment of a Regional EAC Medicines Authority. Conclusion: This is the first study evaluating the performance of the EAC work-sharing initiative from the point of view of the applicants. In general, the applicants believe that the system performs efficiently and fulfils its promise. However, some participants indicated that in some countries an EAC positive recommendation does not directly result in an individual country approvals. Following the recommendations listed in this report may mitigate identified areas for improvement and facilitate the overall goal of the EAC-MRH initiative to expedite the availability of needed quality-assured medicines to patients in the region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Ngum
- Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- African Union Development Agency—New Partnership for Africa’s Development (AUDA-NEPAD), Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Margareth Ndomondo-Sigonda
- African Union Development Agency—New Partnership for Africa’s Development (AUDA-NEPAD), Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Stuart Walker
- Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Salek
- Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Institute of Medicines Development, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ngum N, Mashingia J, Ndomondo-Sigonda M, Walker S, Salek S. Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the East African Community Joint Assessment Procedure by Member Countries: The Way Forward. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:891506. [PMID: 35865962 PMCID: PMC9294367 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.891506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: For almost a decade, the East African Community has implemented the Medicines Regulatory Harmonization (EAC-MRH) programme among its member states to harmonise technical requirements and standards for medical products regulation, jointly conduct scientific review of medical product dossiers to assess safety, efficacy and quality, inspect pharmaceutical manufacturing sites and streamline decision-making processes. This initiative enables the cost-effective use of limited resources and efficient and effective delivery of regulatory services to be determined, thus instilling transparency and accountability in all stakeholders, optimising the pharmaceutical market and economic development and improving access to safe, high-quality, effective medicines in the region. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the current operating model of the EAC-MRH initiative, including challenges faced and to identify opportunities for improvement.Methods: The Process Effectiveness and Efficiency Rating (PEER) questionnaire, which was used to identify the benefits, challenges, and suggestions for improving performance of EAC-MRH initiative, was completed by assessors representing seven EAC authorities in the joint assessment procedure. Semi-structured interviews were also carried out to validate the responses.Results: This initiative has been of considerable value as it moves toward achieving its main objectives of shorter timelines for approval of medicines, information sharing among regulators and capacity building for assessments, resulting in quicker access and increased availability of medicines for patients in the region. However, the key challenges identified that have hindered effectiveness and efficiency were the lack of a centralised submission and tracking system; inadequate human resources, manufacturers’ failure to submit the exact same dossier to all countries of interest; lack of an integrated information management system; lack of information on national medical regulatory authority or EAC websites; and challenges in monitoring and tracking assessment reports.Conclusion: The use of a robust information technology system for the central tracking of EAC products is essential to address the identified challenges and improve regulatory effectiveness and efficiency. One central point for payment is needed to expedite the process and to ensure transparency and the availability of information on decision making on national and regional websites. Other key strategies for enhancement include improving the capacity of assessors, work and information sharing and a coordination mechanism for the regional joint assessment, with the eventual establishment of a regional medicine agency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Ngum
- Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- African Union Development Agency, New Partnership for Africa’s Development (AUDA-NEPAD), Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Margareth Ndomondo-Sigonda
- African Union Development Agency, New Partnership for Africa’s Development (AUDA-NEPAD), Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Stuart Walker
- Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Salek
- Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Institute of Medicines Development, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Sam Salek,
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sithole T, Mahlangu G, Walker S, Salek S. Regulatory Authority Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the ZaZiBoNa Collaborative Medicines Registration Initiative: The Way Forward. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:898743. [PMID: 35547217 PMCID: PMC9082034 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.898743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction ZaZiBoNa, the work-sharing initiative in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) that has been in operation for 8 years has successfully assessed over 300 dossiers/applications, with an overall median time to recommendation of 12 months. All 16 SADC countries participate in the initiative as either active or non-active members. While the successes of ZaZiBoNa are evident, some challenges still exist. The aim of this study was to solicit the views of the participating authorities on the effectiveness and efficiency of the current operating model of the ZaZiBoNa initiative. Methods Data were collected in 2021 using the Process, Effectiveness and Efficiency Rating (PEER) questionnaire developed by the authors. The questionnaire was completed by the focal person in each country and approved by the head of the authority. Results ZaZiBoNa serves as a platform for work sharing, information exchange, capacity building and harmonisation of registration requirements. One of the benefits to regulators has been the improvement in the capacity to conduct assessments. Manufacturers have benefited from compiling one package (modules 2–5) for the initial submission as well as a single response package to the consolidated list of questions, which saves time and resources. Respondents were of the view that patients have benefited as the ZaZiBoNa has contributed to an improved availability and accessibility to quality-assured medicines. Some of the challenges identified were the inadequacy of resources and differences in time to the implementation of ZaZiBoNa recommendations by the individual countries. The establishment of a regional unit hosted in one of the member countries to enable centralised submission and coordination was identified as the best strategy to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the initiative in the interim, with the long-term goal being the establishment of a regional medicines authority. Conclusion The study identified the strengths of the ZaZiBoNa initiative as well as the opportunities for improvement. The recommendations made would further strengthen this initiative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tariro Sithole
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.,Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Gugu Mahlangu
- Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Stuart Walker
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.,Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.,Institute for Medicines Development, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sithole T, Mahlangu G, Walker S, Salek S. Pharmaceutical Industry Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the ZaZiBoNa Collaborative Medicines Registration Initiative: The Way Forward. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:898725. [PMID: 35547215 PMCID: PMC9082673 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.898725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The common technical document (CTD) format harmonised the requirements for the registration of medicines, which had traditionally differed from country to country, making it possible for countries to collaborate and conduct joint reviews of applications. One such collaborative medicines registration initiative is the Southern African Development Community ZaZiBoNa, established in 2013. A recent study was carried out with the nine active member regulatory authorities of the ZaZiBoNa to determine their views on its operational effectiveness and efficiency. Having obtained the authorities' views, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the current operating model of the ZaZiBoNa initiative including the challenges it faces as well as identifying opportunities for improvement from the applicants' perspective. Methods Applicants who had submitted registration/marketing authorisation applications for assessment under the ZaZiBoNa initiative during 2017-2021 were recruited into the study. Data was collected in 2021 using the Process, Effectiveness and Efficiency rating questionnaire (PEER-IND) developed by the authors. The questionnaire was completed by a representative responsible for ZaZiBoNa submissions in each company. Results The pharmaceutical industry was of the view that the ZaZiBoNa initiative has achieved shorter timelines for approval of medicines, resulting in increased availability of quality-assured medicines for patients in the SADC region. Harmonisation of registration requirements and joint reviews have reduced the workload for both the pharmaceutical industry and the regulatory authorities. Some of the challenges identified were the lack of a centralised submission and tracking system, and the lack of information for applicants on the process for submission of ZaZiBoNa dossiers/applications in the individual countries, including contact details of the focal person. The establishment of a regional unit hosted in one of the member countries to centrally receive and track ZaZiBoNa dossiers/applications was identified as the best strategy for moving forward in the interim with the long-term goal being the establishment of a regional medicines authority. Conclusion There was consensus between the pharmaceutical industry and the regulatory authorities as to the way forward to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the ZaZiBoNa initiative. Implementation of the recommendations identified in this study will lead to enhanced regulatory performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tariro Sithole
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Gugu Mahlangu
- Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Stuart Walker
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS), London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Institute for Medicines Development, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kamudoni P, Amtmann D, Johns J, Cook KF, Salem R, Salek S, Raab J, Middleton R, Repovic P, Alschuler KN, von Geldern G, Wundes A, Barrett A, Olayinka-Amao O, Henke C. The validity, responsiveness, and score interpretation of the PROMISnq Physical Function – Multiple Sclerosis 15a short form in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 62:103753. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
24
|
Rahalkar H, Sheppard A, Salek S. Biosimilar development and review process in the BRICS-TM countries: proposal for a standardized model to improve regulatory performance. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2022; 15:215-236. [PMID: 35078378 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2034498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The current study is aimed at proposing a standardized regulatory model for biosimilar development and approval for adoption by BRICS-TM agencies, based on evaluation of regulatory guidelines and potential solutions to challenges. METHODS An established validated questionnaire was used and the recommendations were collated. Propositions deemed critical for improving the regulatory pathway for biosimilar development were synthesized to design a new regulatory model. RESULTS The key areas for improvement in BRICS-TM countries were: effective implementation of a step-wise approach; adoption of science-based regulatory evaluation for clinical efficacy studies and acceptance of analytical comparability studies in lieu of confirmatory clinical trials; a streamlined biosimilar development program for RBP sourcing; regulatory reliance for joint or shared review of the applications; and enhanced transparency and communication between the regulatory agencies and biosimilar developers. Based on these identified critical aspects, a simplified and standard regulatory model was developed to enable standardization of biosimilar guidelines across BRICS-TM countries for a common development program. CONCLUSIONS Effective implementation of the proposed standardized model for biosimilar development and approval processes across the BRICS-TM agencies will eliminate unwarranted studies, reduce the development costs and enhance process efficiency thereby expediting patients' access to new affordable biosimilar medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasumati Rahalkar
- Metina PharmConsulting Pvt Ltd, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.,School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | | | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.,Institute of Medicines Development, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sithole T, Salek S, Mahlangu G, Walker S. Comparison of the registration process of the medicines control authority of Zimbabwe with Australia, Canada, Singapore, and Switzerland: benchmarking best practices. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2021; 15:109-119. [PMID: 34645359 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2022.1987883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benchmarking regulatory systems of low- and middle-income countries with mature systems provides an opportunity to identify gaps, enhance review quality, and reduce registration timelines, thereby improving patients' access to medicines. The aim of this study was to compare the medicines registration process of the Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe (MCAZ) with the regulatory processes in Australia, Canada, Singapore, and Switzerland. METHODS A questionnaire that standardizes the review process, allowing key milestones, activities and practices of the five regulatory authorities was completed by a senior member of the divisions responsible for issuing marketing authorizations. RESULTS The MCAZ has far fewer resources than the regulatory authorities in the comparator countries, but employs three review models, which is in line with international best practice. The MCAZ registration process is similar to the comparator countries in key milestones monitored, but differs in the target timelines for these milestones. The MCAZ is comparable to the comparator authorities in implementing the majority of good review practices, although it significantly lags behind in transparency and communication. CONCLUSION This study identified the MCAZ strengths and opportunities for improvement, which if implemented, will enable the achievement of its vision to be a leading regulatory authority in Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tariro Sithole
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.,Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.,Institute for Medicines Development, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Stuart Walker
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.,Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (Cirs), London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rahalkar H, Sheppard A, Santos GML, Dasgupta C, Perez-Tapia SM, Lopez-Morales CA, Salek S. Current Regulatory Requirements for Biosimilars in Six Member Countries of BRICS-TM: Challenges and Opportunities. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:726660. [PMID: 34568384 PMCID: PMC8458962 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.726660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study was to identify, interpret, and compare the current perspectives of regulatory agencies in six member countries of BRICS-TM (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Turkey, and Mexico) on the different criteria used for biosimilar development and marketing authorisation process. Methods: A semi-quantitative questionnaire was developed covering the organisation of agency, biosimilar development criteria and marketing authorisation process and sent to seven regulatory agencies covering the BRICS-TM countries. All data was kept anonymous and confidential. Data processing and analysis was carried out; descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data and content analysis was employed to generate themes for qualitative data. Results: Out of the seven regulatory agencies included in the study, six representatives provided the responses. The perspectives of these six regulatory agencies varied on a number of aspects relating to the review criteria for biosimilar development and licencing process. The most prevalent model for data assessment is the “full review” of a marketing authorisation application. There is lack of a standard approach across the agencies on sourcing of the reference biological product, in vivo toxicity studies and confirmatory clinical studies. Most agencies restrict interaction with biosimilar developers and any scientific advice is non-binding. The marketing authorisation approval depends on scientific assessment of the dossier, sample analysis and GMP certification. The agencies do not issue any public assessment report specifying the summary basis of biosimilar approval. Conclusion: Regulatory agencies across the six emerging economies are steadily improving the regulatory mechanism in the area of biosimilars. However, there remains scope for increasing the effectiveness and efficiency of the processes by encouraging open and transparent interaction with developers, adopting a flexible approach toward accepting advanced analytical data in lieu of clinical studies and enhancing regulatory reliance amongst agencies. This will help to simplify the new biosimilar development programmes and make them more cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasumati Rahalkar
- Metina PharmConsulting Pvt. Ltd., Navi Mumbai, India.,School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Sonia Mayra Perez-Tapia
- Unidad de Desarrollo e Investigación en Bioprocesos, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Carlos A Lopez-Morales
- Unidad de Desarrollo e Investigación en Bioprocesos, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.,Institute of Medicines Development, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sithole T, Mahlangu G, Capote V, Sitoie T, Shifotoka S, Gaeseb J, Danks L, Nkambule P, Juma A, Fimbo A, Munkombwe Z, Mwale B, Salek S, Walker S. Evaluation of the Review Models and Approval Timelines of Countries Participating in the Southern African Development Community: Alignment and Strategies for Moving Forward. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:742200. [PMID: 34513894 PMCID: PMC8429484 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.742200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Regulatory reliance, harmonization and work sharing have grown over the last few years, resulting in greater sharing of work and information among regulators, enabling efficient use of limited resources and preventing duplication of work. Various initiatives on the African continent include ZaZiBoNa, the Southern African Development Community (SADC) collaborative medicines registration initiative. ZaZiBoNa has resulted in great savings in time and resources; however, identified challenges include lack of clear information regarding the participating countries registration processes and requirements as well as lengthy registration times. The aim of this study, therefore, was to compare the data requirements and review models employed in the assessment of applications for registration, the target timelines for key milestones and the metrics of applications received and approved in 2019 and 2020 by Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Tanzania, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. Methods: A senior member of the division responsible for issuing marketing authorisations completed an established and validated questionnaire, which standardizes the review process, allowing key milestones, activities and practices of the six regulatory authorities to be identified and compared. The completed questionnaires were validated by the heads of the respective agencies. Results: The majority of applications received and approved by all six agencies in 2019 and 2020 were for generics. The mean approval times for generics varied across the countries, with ranges of 218-890 calendar days in 2019 and 158-696 calendar days in 2020. All three types of scientific assessment review models were used by the six agencies and data requirements and extent of scientific assessment were similar for five countries, while one conducted full reviews for new active substances. A large variation was observed in the targets set by the six agencies for the different milestones as well as overall approval times. Conclusions: The study identified the strengths of the countries as well as opportunities for improvement and alignment. Implementation of the recommendations made as in this study will enhance the countries' individual systems, enabling them to efficiently support the ZaZiBoNa initiative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tariro Sithole
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe (MCAZ), Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Gugu Mahlangu
- Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe (MCAZ), Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Velma Capote
- National Directorate of Pharmacy in the Mozambique Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Tania Sitoie
- National Directorate of Pharmacy in the Mozambique Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Saren Shifotoka
- Namibia Medicines Regulatory Council (NMRC) in the Namibia Ministry of Health and Social Services, Windhoek, Namibia
| | - Johannes Gaeseb
- Namibia Medicines Regulatory Council (NMRC) in the Namibia Ministry of Health and Social Services, Windhoek, Namibia
| | - Lorraine Danks
- South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA), Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Portia Nkambule
- South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA), Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Alex Juma
- Tanzania Medicines and Medical Devices Authority (TMDA), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Adam Fimbo
- Tanzania Medicines and Medical Devices Authority (TMDA), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Zuma Munkombwe
- Zambia Medicines Regulatory Authority (ZAMRA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Bernice Mwale
- Zambia Medicines Regulatory Authority (ZAMRA), Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Institute for Medicines Development, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Stuart Walker
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sithole T, Mahlangu G, Capote V, Sitoie T, Shifotoka S, Gaeseb J, Padayachee S, Sehloho T, Khea A, Fimbo A, Munkombwe Z, Mwale B, Salek S, Walker S. Evaluation of the Good Review Practices of Countries Participating in the Southern African Development Community: Alignment and Strategies for Moving Forward. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:742181. [PMID: 34513893 PMCID: PMC8429788 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.742181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: National medicines regulatory agencies are faced with challenges including limited resources and technical capacity, resulting in countries collaborating and sharing resources to improve efficiency of the review process to facilitate access to quality-assured medicines by their populations. One such collaboration is the Southern African Development Community (SADC) medicines registration collaborative initiative, ZaZiBoNa. Countries participate in the initiative by contributing to regulatory reviews and good manufacturing practices inspections. The aim of this study was to review and compare the registration processes of regulatory authorities of Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Tanzania, Zambia, and Zimbabwe to identify strategies for better alignment. Methods: A senior member of the division responsible for issuing marketing authorisations completed an established and validated questionnaire, which standardises the review process, allowing key milestones, activities and practices of the six regulatory authorities to be identified and compared. The completed questionnaires were validated by the heads of the respective agencies. Results: The six countries vary in population and in the size of their respective regulatory agency and the resources allocated to regulatory reviews. The review processes of the six agencies were similar; however, differences were noted in the milestones recorded; for example, two of the countries did not record the start of the scientific assessment. Additionally, decisions for marketing authorisation were made by an expert committee in four of the countries and by the head of the agency and the Minister of Health in two countries. All six agencies implemented the majority of good review practices; however, the need for improvement in the areas of transparency and communication and quality decision making practices was a common finding for all six countries. Conclusions: Participation in the ZaZiBoNa initiative has improved the way in which the six agencies perform regulatory reviews in their countries, highlighting the realisation of one of the key objectives of the initiative, which was building the expert capacity of member countries. Other agencies in the SADC region and beyond can use the results of this study to identify best practices, which in turn, could improve their regulatory performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tariro Sithole
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Gugu Mahlangu
- Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Velma Capote
- National Directorate of Pharmacy, Mozambique Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Tania Sitoie
- National Directorate of Pharmacy, Mozambique Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Saren Shifotoka
- Namibia Medicines Regulatory Council, Namibia Ministry of Health and Social Services, Windhoek, Namibia
| | - Johannes Gaeseb
- Namibia Medicines Regulatory Council, Namibia Ministry of Health and Social Services, Windhoek, Namibia
| | | | - Tohlang Sehloho
- South African Health Products Regulatory Authority, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Akida Khea
- Tanzania Medicines and Medical Devices Authority, Dodoma, Tanzania
| | - Adam Fimbo
- Tanzania Medicines and Medical Devices Authority, Dodoma, Tanzania
| | | | - Bernice Mwale
- Zambia Medicines Regulatory Authority, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Institute for Medicines Development, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Stuart Walker
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rahalkar H, Sheppard A, Salek S. Comparison of BRICS-TM Countries' Biosimilar Regulatory Frameworks With Australia, Canada and Switzerland: Benchmarking Best Practices. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:711361. [PMID: 34434109 PMCID: PMC8381275 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.711361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify, compare and evaluate regulatory requirements for the biosimilar development and review processes in BRICS-TM (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Turkey, Mexico) countries with mature regulatory systems of Australia, Canada, Singapore and Switzerland. It is hoped that this benchmark study provides an opportunity for BRICS-TM agencies to identify the key areas for improvement in their regulatory processes. Materials and Methods: A semi-quantitative questionnaire was developed covering the different criteria used in biosimilar development and registration process. Eleven regulatory agencies from BRICS-TM and ACSS (Australia, Canada, Switzerland and Singapore) countries were invited to take part in this study. Data processing and analysis was carried out using descriptive statistics for quantitative data and content analysis to generate themes for qualitative data. Results and Discussions: Nine of the 11 regulatory agencies recruited for the study completed the questionnaire. China and Singapore did not meet the deadline due to lack of resources. The organisational structure of BRICS-TM agencies revealed support from external assessors by most of these agencies in comparison with ACSS agencies. There was absence of reliance approach and participation in harmonisation activities across most BRICS-TM agencies. Despite alignment over biosimilarity, the mandate for in vivo non-clinical studies and additional local clinical studies in some of the BRICS-TM countries illustrates a lack of effective implementation of a step-wise approach. Adopting flexible regulatory standards in the sourcing of a RBP (Reference Biologic Product) by BRICS-TM similar to ACSS, will facilitate cost-effective development of biosimilar products. Conclusions: Comparative assessment of the biosimilar regulatory framework of BRICS-TM with ACSS agencies reveals the scope for enhancing efficiency of the regulatory approval process. To achieve this, BRICS-TM agencies should consider relying on reference agencies for alternative review mechanisms such as abridged or verification models, streamlined processes for providing scientific advice to developers and for waiving local clinical studies in-lieu of advanced scientific data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasumati Rahalkar
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Metina PharmConsulting Pvt. Ltd., Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India
| | | | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Institute of Medicines Development, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Keyter A, Salek S, Danks L, Nkambule P, Semete-Makokotlela B, Walker S. South African Regulatory Authority: The Impact of Reliance on the Review Process Leading to Improved Patient Access. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:699063. [PMID: 34366850 PMCID: PMC8342884 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.699063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The aims of this study were to compare the overall regulatory review timelines achieved by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) in 2020 to the timelines historically achieved by the Medicines Control Council (MCC). This study also aimed to evaluate the regulatory review processes and the good review practices that have been implemented by SAHPRA to support the assessment of new chemical entities and generic product applications for market authorization in the business-as-usual and backlog process streams. Methods: A questionnaire was completed and verified by SAHPRA to describe the structure of the organization, the resources available, the process for regulatory review of new chemical entities and generic products and the level of implementation of good review practices and regulatory decision-making practices for market authorization. Data were collected and analyzed on the overall approval timelines for new chemical entities and generic products registered by SAHPRA in 2020 in the business-as-usual and backlog process streams. Results: A full, independent scientific review was conducted for all new chemical entities and generic product applications in the business-as-usual stream. Facilitated regulatory pathways were introduced for the review of new chemical entities and generic products in the backlog stream. As a result, the timelines for approval of applications in the backlog stream were 68% quicker for both new chemical entities and generics, using facilitated regulatory pathways, such as abridged and verification review models. Conclusion: The comparisons made through this study provided insight into the improvements that have been made through the establishment of SAHPRA and the transition in 2018 from the MCC. The re-engineered processes that have been developed and implemented by SAHPRA to address the backlog in the review of the applications for market authorization have demonstrated a decrease in the overall median approval times. The expansion of these processes into the routine review of medical products will contribute to the enhanced regulatory performance of SAHPRA and patients’ access to new medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Keyter
- Department of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Salek
- Department of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.,Institute for Medicines Development, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Lorraine Danks
- South African Health Products Regulatory Authority, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Portia Nkambule
- South African Health Products Regulatory Authority, Pretoria, South Africa
| | | | - Stuart Walker
- Department of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.,University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.,Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rahalkar H, Sheppard A, Lopez-Morales CA, Lobo L, Salek S. Challenges Faced by the Biopharmaceutical Industry in the Development and Marketing Authorization of Biosimilar Medicines in BRICS-TM Countries: An Exploratory Study. Pharmaceut Med 2021; 35:235-251. [PMID: 34292558 PMCID: PMC8295548 DOI: 10.1007/s40290-021-00395-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biosimilars are expected to emerge as a rapidly growing segment of the biopharmaceutical industry. However, the biosimilar industry faces multiple challenges and obstacles in developing and marketing these complex products. Divergent regulatory framework in emerging countries adds to repetitive trials and increased cost of biosimilar development, delaying the approval process. Due to such roadblocks, healthcare systems and patients are yet to realize the full benefits of biosimilars. OBJECTIVES The aim of this exploratory study was to specifically identify the challenges faced by the industry in emerging countries including Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Turkey and Mexico (BRICS-TM), pertaining to biosimilar development and the regulatory approval process. In particular, this study aims to understand the perceptions of industry on the barriers faced by them in terms of complexity, costs for biosimilar development and time-to-market for biosimilar product. METHODS A semi-quantitative questionnaire was designed based on secondary research. A total of 93 industry personnel and representatives from 14 trade associations from the BRICS-TM countries with 15-year minimum experience were identified and invited to take part in the study and participate in interviews, which were recorded verbatim. Data processing and analysis was carried out; descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data and content analysis was employed to generate themes for qualitative data. RESULTS Of the 107 biopharmaceutical industry and trade association representatives invited to participate in the study, respondents from 33 biopharmaceutical companies agreed to take part and underwent the interviews. The industry personnel perceived biosimilar guidelines and approval processes as being protracted and in a state of evolution. The absence of an abridged approval pathway limited effectiveness of the regulatory process. The biggest hurdles in the development of biosimilar dossiers were the sourcing of the reference biological product and expectations around confirmatory clinical trials by the agencies. The non-comprehensive implementation of a stepwise approach resulting in unnecessary toxicity studies was also reported as a major challenge. The authors recommend further primary research with BRICS-TM regulatory agencies in order to propose a simplified pathway for development and approval. CONCLUSIONS Lack of standardized biosimilar development criteria and regulatory convergence across BRICS-TM agencies has led to challenges in multi-country development programmes for these medicines, in turn impacting the ability of industry to launch newer and more affordable biosimilars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasumati Rahalkar
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK. .,Metina PharmConsulting Pvt. Ltd., 901-903, Goodwill Infinity, Sector 12, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, 410210, India.
| | | | | | - Luciano Lobo
- Pro Genericos, The Brazilian Association of Generic Drugs, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.,Institute of Medicines Development, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kamudoni P, Johns J, Cook KF, Salem R, Salek S, Raab J, Middleton R, Henke C, Repovic P, Alschuler K, von Geldern G, Wundes A, Amtmann D. Standardizing fatigue measurement in multiple sclerosis: the validity, responsiveness and score interpretation of the PROMIS SF v1.0 - Fatigue (MS) 8a. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2021; 54:103117. [PMID: 34256350 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fatigue is one of the most common and the single most disabling symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, there is a lack of consensus on the most appropriate fatigue measures in clinical practice and research, based upon rigorously validated, generalizable, and publicly available instruments. The objective of this research was to generate additional evidence regarding the validity and applicability of the PROMIS SF v1.0 - Fatigue (MS) 8a, including content validity, reliability, construct validity and responsiveness, as well as to assess minimal important difference (MID) estimates and a score interpretation tool to aide meaningful individual level score interpretation. METHODS A mixed-methods, sequential design was followed. Cognitive debriefing (CD) interviews (n=29) were performed with MS patients, to assess the relevance and comprehensiveness of the PROMIS Fatigue (MS) 8a scores. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the PROMIS Fatigue (MS) 8a, two observational studies were conducted: a cross-sectional study at two US MS centers (n=296), and a 96-week longitudinal study in a UK MS Register cohort (n=384). Main outcomes and measures were estimates of known-groups validity, convergence validity, reliability, and responsiveness, a guide for interpreting PROMIS Fatigue (MS) 8a T-scores, and anchor-based MID estimates. RESULTS The CD interviews confirmed the comprehensiveness and relevance of the PROMIS Fatigue (MS) 8a in assessing MS fatigue. Cronbach's alpha (>0.9) and intra-class correlation coefficient (≥0.9) for test-retest scores at 5-7 days follow-up, supported strong internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Hypothesized differences were found across patient groups in patient reported fatigue and related concepts (analysis of variance [ANOVA], P <0.001). PROMIS Fatigue (MS) 8a scores were sensitive to bi-directional changes in fatigue (GHS fatigue global question) and physical health (PROMIS GHS GPH), over a 52-week follow-up. Score changes of 3.4-4 points are proposed as MID criteria for minimal improvement or worsening in fatigue. CONCLUSION This research extends the evidence supporting the content validity and the robust psychometric performance of the PROMIS Fatigue (MS) 8a across US and UK MS populations. Importantly, data supporting the measure's integration in clinical practice and research, including meaningful score interpretation, are now available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Kamudoni
- Global Evidence & Value Development, R&D, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
| | | | | | - Rana Salem
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
| | - Jana Raab
- Global Evidence & Value Development, R&D, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
| | - Rod Middleton
- UK MS Register, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
| | - Christian Henke
- Global Evidence & Value Development, R&D, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
| | | | - Kevin Alschuler
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | | | - Annette Wundes
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Dagmar Amtmann
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Andreas M, Salek S, Kreuzberger N, Piechotta V, Oliva EN, Ionova T, Monsef I, Skoetz N, Laane E. Patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials for multiple myeloma: Where we are. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e18615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e18615 Background: It is recommended to include patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in cancer trials to ensure clinical benefit based on patients’ perceptions. For multiple myeloma patients, PRO measurement is essential to understand the impact of treatment on their physical and psychosocial functional behaviour. However, it is unclear which PRO instruments are utilized in multiple myeloma trials, how often they are used and whether results are consistently reported. The aim of this project was to explore the use and frequency of PRO instruments in randomized controlled trials for multiple myeloma and to assess the consistency of their reporting. Methods: Within the European Hematology Association (EHA) project to develop guidelines for the use of PROs in adult patients with hematological malignancies, MEDLINE and CENTRAL were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials investigating multiple myeloma between 2015 and 2020. Study design, disease and treatment characteristics, the primary outcome and used PRO instrument(s) were extracted using a pre-defined template. To assess the consistency of PRO reporting, study registries were compared with publications, study protocol and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) reports where available. Results: Overall, 10,707 records were found. Following screening for randomized-controlled trials, 283 ongoing, completed or published studies were included for review. 118 studies planned the use of PROs. The most frequently used PRO instrument (92 studies) was the EORTC QLQ-30, an instrument that measures health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in cancer patients. The disease-specific questionnaire EORTC-MY20 was also frequently used (50 studies). Likewise, the HRQoL instrument EQ-5D was used in 50 studies. Overall, 38 different PRO instruments were reported. In 39 studies for which a study protocol was found, only 19 reported PRO instruments consistently with the trial registry for the study. In addition, in 30 studies, for which a publication reported PRO results (58 overall), the information on PRO instruments differed between publication and the trial registry. For example, PRO instruments mentioned in the registry were omitted in the respective publications. Additionally, information on PRO in HTA reports was available for 26 studies, of which 18 reports were consistent with the trial registries. Conclusions: The results show that measurement of PROs still remain under-utilized in multiple myeloma research. While most PRO instruments identified in this review comply with the recommendations for incorporating PROs into clinical research in adult oncology, they are often inconsistently reported. Thus, reporting standards for the use of PROs are needed to ensure consistency in the use and reporting of PROs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marike Andreas
- Evidence-based Oncology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Nina Kreuzberger
- Evidence-based Oncology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Vanessa Piechotta
- Evidence-based Oncology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Ina Monsef
- Evidence-based Oncology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nicole Skoetz
- Evidence-based Oncology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Edward Laane
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sithole T, Mahlangu G, Salek S, Walker S. Evaluation of the Regulatory Review Process in Zimbabwe: Challenges and Opportunities. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2021; 55:474-489. [PMID: 33387356 PMCID: PMC8021537 DOI: 10.1007/s43441-020-00242-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The aims of this study were to assess the current regulatory review process of the Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe (MCAZ), identify key milestones and target timelines, evaluate the overall performance from 2017 to 2019, identify good review practices, evaluate the quality of decision-making processes, and identify the challenges and opportunities for improvement. Methods A questionnaire was completed by the MCAZ. The agency has participated in the Optimising Efficiencies in Regulatory Agencies (OpERA) program, a multinational endeavor to characterize assessment procedures and metrics associated with regulatory agencies and regional regulatory initiatives. Data identifying the milestones and overall approval times for all products registered MCAZ from 2017 to 2019 were collected and analyzed. Results The MCAZ conducts a full review of quality, safety, and efficacy data for generics and biosimilars not approved by a reference agency, an abridged review for products approved by a reference agency and a verification review for World Health Organization prequalified products under the collaborative registration procedure. The highest number of reviewed products is generics manufactured by foreign companies. There has been an improvement in review times for all categories of products over the three-year period. Guidelines, standard operating procedures, and review templates are in place and the majority of indicators for good review practices are implemented. Although quality decision-making practices are implemented, there is no formal framework in place. Conclusion The MCAZ successfully implements three types of review models in line with international standards. Overall, target timelines are realistic and what is achievable with the current available resources. Recommendations made such as the review of available human resources, separation of agency and company time when setting and measuring targets, review of the templates and benefit-risk framework used for abridged review, and development of a decision-making framework present opportunities for an enhanced regulatory review process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tariro Sithole
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.,Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Gugu Mahlangu
- Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.,Institute of Medicines Development, Cardiff, UK
| | - Stuart Walker
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK. .,Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, 160 Blackfriars Road, London, SE1 8EZ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Keyter A, Salek S, Banoo S, Walker S. A Proposed Regulatory Review Model to Support the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority to Become a More Efficient and Effective Agency. Int J Health Policy Manag 2020; 11:795-809. [PMID: 33300773 PMCID: PMC9309913 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: National regulatory agencies of various sizes and maturity levels, including the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA), have had to revise systems and re-engineer processes in order to adapt to the new regulatory environment and increase the effectiveness of regulatory operations. This study aimed to develop a new regulatory review model for improved regulatory performance, underpinned by the parameters of the World Health Organization Global Benchmarking Tool (WHO GBT) that support strengthening of regulatory systems.
Methods: A new enhanced model for regulatory review, was developed based on the key recommendations from 6 studies, previously conducted by the authors, that were identified as fundamental elements in enhancing regulatory performance. The elements selected to define the new regulatory review model were endorsed through the integration of the parameters of the WHO GBT that, when embedded within regulatory systems, support enhanced regulatory performance.
Results: Opportunities for improvement in regulatory performance were identified and include quality measures; monitoring and evaluating review times; a risk-based evaluation; transparency and communication; and training and education. An improved model for the South African regulatory review and benefit-risk (BR) assessment supported by quality decision-making was proposed as well as recommendations for the application of risk-stratification strategies, strengthening of reliance networks, reinforcing good regulatory practices (GRPs) and enhancing transparency. Conclusion: If implemented the proposed improved regulatory model may pave the way towards more efficient and transparent, streamlined review processes, coupled with increased consistency, evidence-based decision-making practices, reduced timelines and improved patients’ access to new medicines in South Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Keyter
- Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.,South African Health Products Regulatory Authority, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Sam Salek
- Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Shabir Banoo
- South African Health Products Regulatory Authority, Pretoria, South Africa.,Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Witwatersrand, South Africa
| | - Stuart Walker
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, UK.,Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Goswami P, Oliva EN, Ionova T, Else R, Kell J, Fielding AK, Jennings DM, Karakantza M, Al-Ismail S, Collins GP, McConnell S, Langton C, Al-Obaidi MJ, Oblak M, Salek S. Reliability of a Novel Hematological Malignancy Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measure: HM-PRO. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:571066. [PMID: 33192513 PMCID: PMC7606444 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.571066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients' experience of symptoms often goes undetected during consultation in an outpatient clinic, and the use of a patient-reported outcome measure (PRO) in such a setting could be useful to aid treatment decision-making. A new PRO measure, the HM-PRO (Hematological Malignancy Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measure) has been recently developed to evaluate hematological malignancy (HM) patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and their symptom experience in daily clinical practice as well as in research. The objectives of the study were to assess: the internal consistency of the scores for Part A (impact) and its four domains (physical behavior; social well-being; emotional behavior; and eating and drinking habits) and Part B (signs and symptoms); and the test-retest reliability of the individual items of the newly developed hematological malignancy specific composite measure, the HM-PRO. METHODS This was a prospective longitudinal observational study where 150 patients with different HMs and different stage of disease (male n = 98 (65.3%); mean age 64.9 ± 14.4 years, range 17.9-89.2 years; mean time since diagnosis 3.7 ± 4.9 years, range 0.04-25.8 years) completed the HM-PRO at baseline (assessment 1 at t1) and after 7 days (assessment 2 at t2). Data analysis was performed using IBMSPSS 23 statistical software. RESULTS The Cronbach's alpha estimates of the HM-PRO for both assessment points (t1 and t2) were above 0.9 for Part A, and above 0.8 for Part B, showing strong stability of the measurement. The level of agreement for the reproducibility between the two assessments, using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), was very strong with Part A: ICC = 0.93 (95% CI = 0.90-0.95), and Part B: ICC = 0.91 (0.88-0.93). The ICC for the four domains of Part A ranged from 0.85-0.91. The ICC was greater than 0.8 for overall score of Part A and Part B for all the 10 diagnoses, confirming strong reliability. CONCLUSION This study clearly indicates that the HM-PRO possesses strong test-retest reliability for both Part A and Part B. The Cronbach's alpha confirmed acceptable internal consistency. The extensive reliability testing described in this study supports the generic nature of the HM-PRO for use in hematological malignancies in both routine clinical practice, to aid treatment decisions, as well as in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pushpendra Goswami
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Esther N. Oliva
- Hematology Unit, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Tatyana Ionova
- St. Petersburg State University Medical Center and Multinational Centre for Quality of Life Research, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Roger Else
- Patient Research Partner, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Kell
- Department of Hematology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Adele K. Fielding
- Department of Hematology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel M. Jennings
- Department of Hematology, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - Marina Karakantza
- Department of Hematology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Saad Al-Ismail
- Department of Hematology, Singleton Hospital, ABM University Health Board, Swansea, United Kingdom
| | - Graham P. Collins
- Department of Hematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Stewart McConnell
- Department of Hematology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine Langton
- Department of Hematology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Magda J. Al-Obaidi
- Department of Hematology, West Middlesex University Hospital, Isleworth, United Kingdom
| | - Metod Oblak
- Department of Hematology, West Middlesex University Hospital, Isleworth, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Goswami P, Oliva EN, Ionova T, Else R, Kell J, Fielding AK, Jennings DM, Karakantza M, Al-Ismail S, Collins GP, McConnell S, Langton C, Salek S. Quality-of-life issues and symptoms reported by patients living with haematological malignancy: a qualitative study. Ther Adv Hematol 2020; 11:2040620720955002. [PMID: 33101618 PMCID: PMC7549153 DOI: 10.1177/2040620720955002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Our aim was to identify health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) issues and symptoms in patients with haematological malignancies (HMs) and develop a conceptual framework to reflect the inter-relation between them. Methods A total of 129 patients with HMs were interviewed in a UK multicentre qualitative study. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using NVivo-11. Results Overall, 34 issues were reported by patients and were grouped into two parts: quality of life (QoL) and symptoms. The most prevalent HRQoL issues were: eating and drinking habits; social life; physical activity; sleep; and psychological well-being. Furthermore, most prevalent disease-related symptoms were: tiredness; feeling unwell; breathlessness; lack of energy; and back pain. The most prevalent treatment side effects were: tiredness; feeling sick; disturbance in sense of taste; and breathlessness. Conclusions Both HMs and their treatments have a significant impact on patients' HRQoL, in particular on issues such as job-role change, body image and impact on finances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pushpendra Goswami
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Esther N Oliva
- Haematology Unit, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Tatyana Ionova
- St Petersburg State University Medical Center and Multinational Centre for Quality of Life Research, St Petersburg, Russia
| | - Roger Else
- Patient Research Partner, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - Jonathan Kell
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Daniel M Jennings
- Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | | | - Saad Al-Ismail
- Singleton Hospital, ABM University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | | | | | | | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Science, University of Hertfordshire, Health Research Building (2F412), College Lane, Hatfield, Herts AL10 9BR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Goswami P, Oliva EN, Ionova T, Else R, Kell J, Fielding AK, Jennings DM, Karakantza M, Al-Ismail S, Collins GP, McConnell S, Langton C, Al-Obaidi MJ, Oblak M, Salek S. Hematological Malignancy Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (HM-PRO): Construct Validity Study. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:1308. [PMID: 33013368 PMCID: PMC7506039 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Validity is the ability of an instrument to measure what it claims to measure. It means the degree to which the empirical evidence supports the trustworthiness of interpretations based on the calculated scores. The hematological malignancy (HM) specific patient reported outcome measure (HM-PRO), is a newly developed instrument for use in daily clinical practice as well as in research. This study, provides the evidence for construct validity of the HM-PRO, specifically focusing on the convergent and divergent validity compared to the other established instruments used in hematology. METHODS This validation study adopted a prospective cross-sectional design where a heterogeneous group of patients diagnosed with different HMs and different disease state were recruited. A total of 905 patients were recruited from seven secondary care hospitals in the UK and online through five patient organizations. Patients were asked to complete the HM-PRO and other cancer specific PRO's, FACT-G and EORTC QLQ C-30. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS 23 statistical software. RESULTS A total of 486 males (53.7%) and 419 females (46.3%), with a mean age of 64.3 (± 12.4) years and mean time since diagnosis of 4.6 ( ± 5.2) were recruited. The total score of Part A of the HM-PRO highly correlated with the five functional scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (Physical = -0.71, Role = -0.72, Emotional = -0.64, Cognitive = -0.58, Social = -0.74-p < 0.001). With respect to correlation with FACT-G, the total score of Part A of the HM-PRO highly correlated with Physical (-0.74), Emotional (-0.57), Functional (-0.66) domains and overall score of FACT-G (-0.74). Similarly, the total score of Part B of the HM-PRO highly correlated with three symptoms scales of EORTC QLQ-C30 (Fatigue scale = -0.74, Nausea and Vomiting = -0.52, Pain = -0.59-p < 0.001) and individual symptom items (Dyspnea = 0.51, Insomnia= 0.43, Appetite loss = 0.54-p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The construct validity evidence presented in this research is a testimony to the HM-PRO's ability to measure HRQoL issues which it intends to measure. This is of utmost importance when a PRO is used in routine clinical practice so that the interpretation of the scores or response to an individual item is understood by the clinicians/nurses as intended by the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pushpendra Goswami
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Esther N. Oliva
- Haematology Unit, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Tatyana Ionova
- St. Petersburg State University Medical Center and Multinational Centre for Quality of Life Research, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Roger Else
- Patient Research Partner, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Kell
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | | | - Daniel M. Jennings
- Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Saad Al-Ismail
- Singleton Hospital, ABM University Health Board, Swansea, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Metod Oblak
- West Middlesex University Hospital, Isleworth, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mashaki Ceyhan E, Walker S, Salek S. Patients' Perspectives of the Pharmaceutical Regulatory and Reimbursement Systems in Istanbul, Turkey. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2020; 54:1086-1096. [PMID: 32030691 DOI: 10.1007/s43441-020-00124-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to explore patients' knowledge and perspectives in Istanbul, Turkey about the pharmaceutical regulatory review and reimbursement processes with respect to patients' access to new medicines. METHODS For the purpose of this study a tailored made paper-based questionnaire, Patient Perspective Questionnaire (PPQ), was developed and subsequently piloted in the target population. A total of 350 patients were recruited consecutively into the study from hospital outpatient clinics, general practice, community pharmacies, patient organisations in 28 different districts of Istanbul receiving treatment for chronic conditions. In addition, 22 patients were randomly selected from the cohort for face-to-face interviews in order to obtain further insights about the relevance of the PPQ, and to help with formalising a set of recommendations for the involvement of patients in both processes. Data processing and analyses were carried out using SPSS version 23 statistical software. RESULTS Overall 210 (60% response rate) completed the PPQ (51% males) with the mean age of 56, median of 54 and range of 18-75. Most patients in this study (84%) seemed to know that medicines had to be approved by the government. However, 81% of patients were not aware of the regulatory review process with 73% being unaware of approval timelines. Furthermore, 78 (37%) patients described the Turkish approval process to be of a lower standard compared to that of the US and EU. However, 147 (70%) of patients believed that there are novel alternative medicines for their disease available in other developed countries. Similarly, 126 (60%) patients thought that new medicines only become available in Turkey after their availability in the other developed countries. In contrast, patients in this cohort were more aware of the reimbursement system in Turkey where the majority expressed their satisfaction and 34% described access to new medicines to be adequate. In addition, the majority of patients (75%) recognised that the government is the main payer, even though insufficient information is provided about new medicines. Patients stated that they do not have any role in the decision-making process for the approval or reimbursement of new medicines and therefore most of them indicated that they wish to be more involved in reimbursement (60%) as well as in the approval process (58%). DISCUSSION Faster access to medicines, improved health and pharmaceutical care as well as lower prices were considered by the study patients as the improvement priorities. Further, they were able to offer academic collaboration and active patient involvement in both processes as possible solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emel Mashaki Ceyhan
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS), 160 Blackfriars Road, London, UK.,School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3NB, UK
| | - Stuart Walker
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS), 160 Blackfriars Road, London, UK.,School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bujar M, McAuslane N, Walker S, Salek S. A Process for Evaluating Quality Decision-Making Practices During the Development, Review and Reimbursement of Medicines. Int J Health Policy Manag 2020; 11:128-137. [PMID: 32610811 PMCID: PMC9278608 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.86] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The development of a medicine is not only underpinned by good science but also by Quality DecisionMaking Practices (QDMPs). Indeed, it is important to ensure that all organisations involved in the lifecycle of medicines are aligning their practices in decision-making to the QDMPs to ensure quality, transparent and consistent decisionmaking processes. Methods: The aim of this study was to evaluate the practicality of QoDoS (Quality of Decision-Making Orientation Scheme) in assessing the incorporation of ten QDMPs during the development, review and reimbursement of medicines, illustrated by case studies with a pharmaceutical company, a regulatory authority and a health technology assessment (HTA) agency. Individuals from each organisation completed the 47-item QoDoS questionnaire. Results: The results demonstrate the applicability of QoDoS in identifying favourable and unfavourable practices and in assessing the consistency and transparency of the QDMPs within each organisation, as well as across the different stakeholders. Furthermore, the study established the value of the methodology in raising awareness of the biases and best practices in decision-making, as well as having a basis for discussion for differences within and across stakeholders to promote consistency and alignment in decision-making. Finally, the QoDoS demonstrated the need for improvement across a number of decision-making practices for the 3 organisations such as the evaluation of alternatives and of the decision impact. Conclusion: The QoDoS can be used to benchmark organisations’ decision-making practices to provide a basis for discussion to ultimately encourage a level of trust across and within organisations and helping to identify areas for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Bujar
- Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life & Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS), London, UK
| | - Neil McAuslane
- Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life & Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Stuart Walker
- Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life & Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS), London, UK
| | - Sam Salek
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS), London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Keyter A, Salek S, Banoo S, Walker S. Can Standardisation of the Public Assessment Report Improve Benefit-Risk Communication? Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:855. [PMID: 32625087 PMCID: PMC7313675 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background National regulatory authorities (NRAs) make the decision to register a medicine based on an assessment of its benefits and risks and publicly available assessment reports are used as a tool to communicate the basis for the decision. The Universal Methodology for Benefit-Risk Assessment (UMBRA) has also been used to effectively communicate the basis of regulatory decisions. Many NRAs in emerging markets place reliance on the public assessment reports (PARs) of reference agencies to inform about their own regulatory decisions. However, PAR users often criticise the redacted nature of PARs and may be challenged in identifying key benefits and risks, value judgements, and benefit-risk (BR) trade-offs. Methods PARs for ertugliflozin l-pyroglutamic acid, erenumab, and durvalumab published by regulatory bodies in Australia, Europe, Canada, and the United States were compared with the validated UMBRA Benefit-Risk Template to evaluate the BR decision documentation. Published validation of UMBRA included report of a consortium of four regulatory authorities in Australia, Canada, Switzerland, and Singapore indicating that their clinical assessment templates were modified to align with the UMBRA approach. A focus group discussed the use of PARs as potential knowledge management tools for stakeholder understanding of regulatory decision making. The South African Health Product Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) approach to document and communicate the BR decisions was evaluated. Results Results indicate key elements to include in the PARs including regulatory history, an effects table and a record of the strengths and uncertainties for each benefit and risk. Focus group participants agreed that a harmonised PAR template would support improved regulatory decision-making transparency. SAHPRA communication of BR decisions could be improved through the use of the UMBRA BR Template as a guidance for BR assessment and the basis of the South Africa public assessment report format. Conclusion SAHPRA's use of a structured template that supports transparent and quality decision making could have a major impact in ensuring consistency in the BR assessment of new medicines. The implementation of this effective approach for communicating BR decisions will advance agency goals of being a trusted, responsive, accountable regulatory body in which all healthcare stakeholders may rely on with confidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Keyter
- Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.,South African Health Products Regulatory Authority, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Sam Salek
- Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Shabir Banoo
- South African Health Products Regulatory Authority, Johannesburg, South Africa.,Right to Care and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Stuart Walker
- Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.,Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Gabes M, Jourdan C, Schramm K, Masur C, Abels C, Kamudoni P, Salek S, Apfelbacher C. Hyperhidrosis Quality of Life Index (HidroQoL©): further validation and clinical application in patients with axillary hyperhidrosis using data from a phase III randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol 2020; 184:473-481. [PMID: 32510573 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.19300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Hyperhidrosis Quality of Life Index (HidroQoL©) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure capturing the quality of life of people affected by hyperhidrosis. OBJECTIVES We aimed to extend the validity evidence to physician-confirmed diagnosis of primary axillary hyperhidrosis. METHODS Data from a phase III randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial were used (n = 171). Confirmatory factor analysis was carried out to confirm the a priori two-factor structure of the HidroQoL. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to evaluate test-retest reliability after days -7 to -4. Convergent validity was assessed using correlations with the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) and gravimetric sweat production. Known groups were analysed to evaluate discriminative validity. Responsiveness after 29 days was assessed and minimal important difference (MID) values were calculated using both anchor- and distribution-based approaches. All analyses were carried out for total HidroQoL and its two domains. RESULTS The two-factor structure of the HidroQoL was confirmed. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were strong (Cronbach's α 0·81-0·90; ICCs 0·89-0·93). Correlations with other outcome measures were in line with a priori hypotheses. The HidroQoL discriminated between different severity groups (P ≤ 0·001) and showed sensitivity to change towards improvement (P < 0·001). An MID value of 4 is proposed for the total scale. CONCLUSIONS This study supports excellent measurement properties including clinical applicability of the HidroQoL in primary axillary hyperhidrosis and suggests a MID of 4 be applied to clinical trial data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Gabes
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Economics, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.,Medical Sociology, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - C Jourdan
- FGK Clinical Research GmbH, Munich, Germany
| | - K Schramm
- FGK Clinical Research GmbH, Munich, Germany
| | - C Masur
- Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - C Abels
- Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - S Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, UK.,Institute of Medicines Development, Cardiff, UK
| | - C Apfelbacher
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Economics, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Goswami P, Oliva EN, Ionova T, Else R, Kell J, Fielding AK, Jennings DM, Karakantza M, Al-Ismail S, Collins GP, McConnell S, Langton C, Salek S. Development of a Novel Hematological Malignancy Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (HM-PRO): Content Validity. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:209. [PMID: 32210809 PMCID: PMC7066982 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The quality of life of patients at all stages of hematological malignancy is greatly affected by the disease and its treatment. There is a wide range of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) issues important to these patients. Any new instrument developed to measure HRQoL of such patients should be content valid, i.e., the items should be comprehensively relevant to the patients and their health condition. The aim of the present study was to examine content validity of a hematological malignancy specific patient reported outcome measure (HM-PRO) developed for use in routine clinical practice. METHODS Following literature review and semi-structured interviews, the generated themes and sub-themes were discussed to develop the prototype version of the HM-PRO. A 4-step approach was used for content validation: initial testing and cognitive interviewing; item rating; content validity panel meeting; final field testing and cognitive interviewing. Additional questions related to patients' perception of recall period and preferred sentence structure (i.e., question or statement) of the items were also asked during cognitive interviews. RESULTS The content analysis of 129 transcribed semi-structured interviews resulted in the prototype version of the instrument consisting of 58 items grouped into two parts: Part A (impact/HRQoL - 34 items) and Part B (signs and symptoms - 24 items). The initial testing showed intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of >0.8 for both Part A and Part B. Item rating for language clarity, completeness, relevance, and response scale by experts and patients showed content validity index for scales average >0.8 for both Part A and Part B, except 0.64 for relevance for Part A by the patient panel. The final testing of the revised version of the instrument showed the Cronbach's alpha value of 0.91 for Part A and 0.76 for Part B, suggesting high internal consistency, and ICC of 0.91 for Part A and 0.76 for Part B. The recall period of "today" for Part-A and "last 3 days" for Part-B were the patients' preferred "recall period." Furthermore, the patients expressed preference to the HM-PRO items as statements. CONCLUSION The findings of this study confirm that the HM-PRO possesses a strong content validity, includes all the issues important to patients and is easy to read, understand and respond to spontaneously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pushpendra Goswami
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Esther N. Oliva
- Haematology Unit, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Tatyana Ionova
- St. Petersburg State University Medical Center and Multinational Centre for Quality of Life Research, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Roger Else
- Patient Research Partner, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Kell
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Saad Al-Ismail
- Singleton Hospital, ABM University Health Board, Swansea, United Kingdom
| | - Graham P. Collins
- Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bujar M, McAuslane N, Walker SR, Salek S. Quality Decision Making in Health Technology Assessment: Issues Facing Companies and Agencies. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2020; 54:275-282. [DOI: 10.1007/s43441-019-00054-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/18/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
45
|
Dalgard FJ, Svensson Å, Halvorsen JA, Gieler U, Schut C, Tomas-Aragones L, Lien L, Poot F, Jemec GB, Misery L, Szabo C, Linder D, Sampogna F, Koulil SSV, Balieva F, Szepietowski JC, Lvov A, Marron SE, Altunay IK, Finlay AY, Salek S, Kupfer J. Itch and Mental Health in Dermatological Patients across Europe: A Cross-Sectional Study in 13 Countries. J Invest Dermatol 2020; 140:568-573. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Revised: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
46
|
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Salek
- Medicines Research Unit, University of Wales, Cardiff, Wales
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Altunay IK, Özkur E, Dalgard FJ, Gieler U, Tomas Aragones L, Lien L, Poot F, Jemec GB, Misery L, Szabó C, Linder D, Sampogna F, Evers AWM, Halvorsen JA, Balieva F, Szepietowski JC, Romanov DV, Marron SE, Finlay AY, Salek S, Kupfer J. Psychosocial Aspects of Adult Acne: Data from 13 European Countries. Acta Derm Venereol 2020; 100:adv00051. [PMID: 31993670 PMCID: PMC9128864 DOI: 10.2340/00015555-3409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The link between acne and psychiatric morbidities has been demonstrated in many studies; however, large scale studies aiming to reveal the psychosocial impact of acne are rare. The aim of this study was to assess the psychological burden of adult acne patients. This analysis was based on a multicenter study including 213 acne patients and 213 controls from 13 European countries. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Dermatology Life Quality Index, and EuroQol 5 dimensions 3 levels scores of the patients with acne were analyzed. Patients with acne (n = 213) had higher HADS scores for anxiety (mean ± standard deviation 6.70 ± 3.84) and depression (3.91 ± 3.43) than the controls (p < 0.001 for both). For patients with acne, 40.6% reported that they were very concerned about their skin disease, 12.3% had suicidal ideation, and, among those, 10 (4%) patients implied that acne was the cause of their suicidal thoughts. After adjusting for other variables, patients who had suicidal ideation (p = 0.007, and adjusted odds ratio 3.32 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.39-7.93]) and stressful life events (p < 0.001, and adjusted OR 5.85 [95% CI: 2.65-12.86]) had a greater chance of fulfilling the HADS criteria for anxiety. This study highlights the need for a psychotherapeutic approach in order to recognize the concerns of acne patients and optimize their treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilknur K Altunay
- Department of Dermatology, University of Health Sciences, Şişli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul , Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Salek S, Boscoe AN, Piantedosi S, Egan S, Evans CJ, Wells T, Cohen J, Klaassen RJ, Grace R, Storm M. Development of the pyruvate kinase deficiency diary and pyruvate kinase deficiency impact assessment: Disease-specific assessments. Eur J Haematol 2019; 104:427-434. [PMID: 31880847 PMCID: PMC7216839 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Revised: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Currently recommended patient‐reported outcome (PRO) measures for patients with pyruvate kinase (PK) deficiency are non‐disease‐specific. The PK Deficiency Diary (PKDD) and PK Deficiency Impact Assessment (PKDIA) were developed to be more targeted measures for capturing the symptoms and impacts of interest to this patient population. Methods The instruments were developed based on concept elicitation interviews with 21 adults and modified based on 20 cognitive interviews. The domain structure and item concepts of the PKDD and PKDIA were compared with currently recommended measures, the EORTC QLQ‐C30 and the SF‐36v2®. Results The PKDD is a seven‐item measure of the core signs and symptoms of PK deficiency. The PKDIA is a 14‐item measure of the impacts of PK deficiency on patients’ health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). Minimal similarities were found between the new measures and the EORTC QLQ‐C30 (eg, 43% of concepts were similar to the PKDD; 42% were similar to the PKDIA) and SF‐36v2® (57% of concepts were similar to the PKDD; 17% were similar to the PKDIA). Conclusions The PKDD and PKDIA fill a gap in the existing outcomes measurement strategy for PK deficiency. Future work includes psychometric evaluation of these newly developed measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert J Klaassen
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Rachael Grace
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Program, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ali FM, Salek S, Finlay AY, Piguet V. Validation of the electronic Psoriasis Area and Severity Index application: Establishing measurement equivalence. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 81:1439-1441. [PMID: 31228524 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.04.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2019] [Revised: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Faraz Mahmood Ali
- Division of Infection and Immunity, Department of Dermatology and Academic Wound Healing, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom; Institute for Medicines Development, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Y Finlay
- Division of Infection and Immunity, Department of Dermatology and Academic Wound Healing, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Vincent Piguet
- Division of Infection and Immunity, Department of Dermatology and Academic Wound Healing, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, and Division of Dermatology, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Goswami P, Oliva EN, Ionova T, Else R, Kell J, Fielding AK, Jennings DM, Karakantza M, Al-Ismail S, Lyness J, Collins GP, McConnell S, Langton C, Al-Obaidi MJ, Oblak M, Salek S. Paper and electronic versions of HM-PRO, a novel patient-reported outcome measure for hematology: an equivalence study. J Comp Eff Res 2019; 8:523-533. [PMID: 31037971 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2018-0108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To determine measurement equivalence of paper and electronic application of the hematological malignancy-patient-reported outcome (HM-PRO), a specific measure for the evaluation of patient-reported outcomes in HMs. Patients & methods: Following International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research ePRO Good Research Practice Task Force guidelines, a total of 193 adult patients with different HMs were recruited into a multicenter prospective study. The paper and the electronic version of the instrument were completed in the outpatient clinics in a randomized crossover design with a 30 min time interval to minimize the learning effect. Those who completed the paper version first, completed the electronic version after 30 min and vice versa. Instrument version and order effects were tested on total score of the two parts of the HM-PRO (Part A: quality of life and Part B: signs & symptoms) in a two-way ANOVA with patients as random effects. Intraclass correlation coefficients (95% CI) and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were used to evaluate test–retest reliability and reproducibility. The effects of instrument version and order were tested on total score of the two parts of HM-PRO. Results: The questionnaire version and administration order effects were not significant at the 5% level. There were no interactions found between these two factors for HM-PRO (Part A [quality of life]; p = 0.95); and (part B [signs and symptoms]; p = 0.72]. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were greater than 0.9, and intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.94 to 0.98; furthermore, the scores were not statistically different between the two versions, showing acceptable reliability indexes. Noteworthy, the difference between the completion time for both paper (mean = 6:38 min) and electronic version (mean = 7:29 min) was not statistically significant (n = 100; p = 0.11). Patients did not report any difficulty in completing the electronic version during cognitive interviews and were able to understand and respond spontaneously. Conclusion: Measurement equivalence has been demonstrated for the paper and electronic application of the HM-PRO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pushpendra Goswami
- School of Life & Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Esther N Oliva
- Haematology Unit, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Tatyana Ionova
- St Petersburg State University Medical Centre & Multinational Centre for Quality of Life Research, St Petersburg, Russia
| | - Roger Else
- Patient Research Partner, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - Jonathan Kell
- Haematology, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Adele K Fielding
- Haematology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Daniel M Jennings
- Haematology, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | | | - Saad Al-Ismail
- Haematology, Singleton Hospital, ABM University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | - Jack Lyness
- Haematology, Singleton Hospital, ABM University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Metod Oblak
- Haematology, West Middlesex University Hospital, Isleworth, UK
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life & Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| |
Collapse
|