Effective treatment of malignant hypercalcaemia with a single intravenous infusion of clodronate

Bisphosphonate nephropathy: A case series and review of the literature

From rat studies, human case reports and cohort studies, bisphosphonates seem to impair renal function. However, when critically reviewing the literature, zoledronate and pamidronate are more frequently involved in renal deterioration than other bisphosphonates. When bisphosphonate nephropathy occurs, zoledronate more frequently induces tubular toxicity whereas pamidronate typically induces focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Thus, although bisphosphonates are highly effective in preventing complications for patients with osseous metastases and are highly effective in preventing fractures for patients with osteoporosis, renal function should be monitored closely after initiation of these drugs.

Repurposing amino-bisphosphonates by liposome formulation for a new role in cancer treatment

Amino-bisphosphonates (N-BPs) have been commercially available for over four decades and are used for the treatment of osteoporosis, Paget's disease, hypercalcemia of malignancy, and bone metastases derived from various cancer types. Zoledronate and alendronate, two of the most potent N-BPs, have demonstrated direct tumoricidal activity on tumor cells and immune modulatory effects on myeloid cells and T cells in vitro and in animal models of cancer. However, the rapid renal clearance and sequestration in mineral bone of these drugs in free form severely limit their systemic exposure and applications in cancer patients. Reformulation of N-BPs by encapsulation in liposomal nanoparticles addresses these pharmacokinetic barriers, and liposomal zoledronate and alendronate formulations have been found to increase the anticancer efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapies and adoptive T cell immunotherapies in murine cancer models. Herein, we review the differences in pharmacology between N-BPs versus non-N-BPs (e.g., clodronate), free versus liposomal N-BP formulations, and targeted versus non-targeted liposomal N-BPs, and the clinical and preclinical evidence supporting a role for liposomal N-BPs in the treatment of cancer. We propose that pegylated liposomal alendronate (PLA) has the most potential for clinical translation based on favorable therapeutic index, ability to passively target and accumulate in tumors, proven biocompatibility of the liposome carrier, and preclinical anticancer efficacy.

Bisphosphonates in Oncology: Physiopathologic Bases and Clinical Activity

Osteoclastic activation is the ultimate way of bone resorption in neoplasia, induced by the combined effects of tumor-secreted humoral factors (especially parathyroid hormone-related peptides) and osteoclastic-osteoblastic interaction. Bisphosphonates inhibit the osteoclast activity and reduce bone resorption and are a valuable supportive measure for bone disease of neoplasms. Experimental models also suggest an activity of bisphosphonates against cancer cells. Controlled studies, especially in advanced breast cancer and multiple myeloma, indicate different effectiveness against the distinct skeletal-related events. Intravenous clodronate and, especially, pamidronate and zoledronate are the first-choice drugs for hypercalcemia, and they play a significant role in reducing metastatic bone pain. Their prolonged use delays, without hampering, the progression of bone disease, including the appearance of osteolysis and the occurrence of pathologic fractures. This effect is probably more valuable when bisphosphonates are administered early in the course of the disease. The evidence that adjuvant bisphosphonates improve survival needs to be confirmed in ongoing studies. Although poorly absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract, oral bisphosphonates are effective in preventing and treating cancer-induced osteoporosis in long-living patients with operable breast cancer. At present, there is little hope that newer bisphosphonates are more effective than those currently used.

Clodronic acid formulations available in Europe and their use in osteoporosis: a review

Clodronic acid (Cl(2)-MBP [dichloromethylene bisphosphonic acid], clodronate) is a halogenated non-nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate with antiresorptive efficacy in a variety of diseases associated with excessive bone resorption. The drug is believed to inhibit bone resorption through induction of osteoclast apoptosis, but appears also to possess anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties that contrast with the acute-phase and inflammatory effects seen with nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. Clodronic acid has been shown to be effective in the maintenance or improvement of bone mineral density when given orally, intramuscularly or intravenously in patients with osteoporosis. Use of the drug is also associated with reductions in fracture risk. The intramuscular formulation, which is given at a dose of 100 mg weekly or biweekly, is at least as effective as daily oral therapy and appears more effective than intermittent intravenous treatment. Intramuscular clodronic acid in particular has also been associated with improvements in back pain. The drug is well tolerated, with no deleterious effects on bone mineralization, and use of parenteral therapy eliminates the risk of gastrointestinal adverse effects that may be seen in patients receiving bisphosphonate therapy.

Clodronate as a single-dose intravenous infusion effectively provides short-term correction of malignant hypercalcemia

The efficacy and safety of a single intravenous (I.V.) infusion of clodronate 1500 mg or 900 mg was compared with a single I.V. infusion of pamidronate 90 mg in the treatment of malignant hypercalcemia. Primary efficacy data from two separate, but parallel, randomized double-blind controlled multi-center studies (N = 63), involving patients with malignant hypercalcemia (S-Ca(cor) > 2.68 mmol/l), were pooled along with results from a study (N = 4), in which an open I.V. phase was followed by a randomized oral phase. The primary efficacy variable, the proportion of normocalcemic patients at day 5 could be evaluated from 51 subjects. Of them, 21 were in the clodronate 1500 mg group, 10 in the clodronate 900 mg group and 20 in the pamidronate 90 mg group. After the rehydration, the patients were given a single I.V. infusion of clodronate 1500 mg, clodronate 900 mg or pamidronate 90 mg. The patients were followed up for five days and S-Ca(cor) was measured daily. At day 5, a total of 16 patients (76%) in the clodronate 1500 mg group, six patients (60%) in the clodronate 900 mg group and 17 patients (85%) in the pamidronate 90 mg group were normocalcemic, the differences between the treatment groups being statistically non-significant. The differences in the mean S-Ca(cor) between the treatment groups were statistically non-significant. I.V. clodronate given either as 900 mg or 1500 mg single-dose was safe and well tolerated.

Current management strategies for hypercalcemia

The two most common causes of hypercalcemia are primary hyperparathyroidism and neoplastic disease. Parathyroidectomy is the only curative intervention for the former condition. In the rare cases of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who present with clinical symptoms due to their hypercalcemia, pharmacological treatment may be required. Fluid repletion and intravenous (IV) administration of bisphosphonates are recommended in the literature. Calcium receptor agonists (calcimimetic agents) are at the present time only available for use within clinical trials. Cancer patients usually present with symptoms of hypercalcemia. Rapid institution of antihypercalcemic treatment is essential in preventing life-threatening deterioration. Fluid repletion and administration of bisphosphonates are the treatment mainstays in hypercalcemia of malignancy. Five bisphosphonates are currently licensed in Europe for treatment of tumor-associated hypercalcemia: etidronate, clodronate, pamidronate, ibandronate, and zoledronate. In the US, pamidronate and zoledronate are licensed for use in this indication. Bisphosphonates containing nitrogen atoms (e.g. pamidronate, ibandronate, and zoledronate) are more potent than those without (e.g. etidronate, clodronate, and tiludronate). In patients with malignant hypercalcemia, the efficacy of the individual bisphosphonate depends on dose administered and initial serum calcium concentration. At present, pamidronate has been studied in the greatest number of investigations and in the largest number of patients. In the literature, the efficacy of pamidronate in restoring normocalcemia ranges between 40% and 100%, depending on the dose used and baseline serum calcium concentration. More recently, one study reported that pamidronate was inferior to zoledronate. In this study, the duration of response was also longer in the two zoledronate groups (30 and 40 days) than in the pamidronate group (17 days). The most serious adverse events of bisphosphonates concern renal function. Increases in serum creatinine levels have been more frequently reported following treatment of tumor-associated hypercalcemia with etidronate (8%) and clodronate (5%) than with the nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates pamidronate (2%) and ibandronate (1%). The frequency of increases in serum creatinine levels following treatment with zoledronate is difficult to estimate. Administration of the nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates has been associated with transient (usually mild) fever, lymphocytopenia, malaise, and myalgias. These events occur within 36 hours of the first dose and are self-limiting. Hypocalcemia occurs in up to 50% of patients treated with bisphosphonates for hypercalcemia of malignancy, although symptomatic hypocalcemia is rare. The toxicity and low efficacy of plicamycin (mithramycin) mean that use of this agent should be restricted to patients with hypercalcemia of malignancy who fail to respond to IV bisphosphonates. Calcitonin is characterized by good tolerability but poor efficacy in normalizing the serum calcium level. However, a major advantage of calcitonin is the acute onset of the hypocalcemic effect, which contrasts with the delayed but more pronounced effect of bisphosphonates. Combination calcitonin and bisphosphonate treatment may therefore be of value when rapid reduction of serum calcium is warranted. Gallium nitrate may be a valuable treatment for hypercalcemia of malignancy. It is characterized by high efficacy and few adverse events apart from renal toxicity (10% of cases). However, data are very limited and further trials are necessary.

New model for simulation of fracture repair in full-grown beagle dogs: model characterization and results from a long-term study with ibandronate

INTRODUCTION

Given that bisphosphonates reduce bone turnover, it is important to establish that their long-term administration does not impair bone quality. This paper describes a new model for simulation of fracture repair to evaluate several aspects of bone quality following long-term administration (34 or 36 weeks) of ibandronate in full-grown beagle dogs.

METHODS

The treatment schedule consisted of continuous daily subcutaneous administration of a pharmacologically active dose (1 microg/kg/day) and two cyclical intermittent regimens providing a similar total dose per animal at the end of the experiment. Seven or 8 weeks before study end, 10 holes were drilled in the left tibia and bone marrow ablation was performed in the ipsilateral femur. Serial measurements for blood biochemistry (osteocalcin and iso-alkaline phosphatase) and bone mineral density (BMD; whole body and L1-L7) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) were performed during the experiment. Bone quality was determined at the end of the experiment by assessing early and late stage defect healing and structural, cellular, and dynamic histomorphometry (femur, tibia, and lumbar vertebrae L3 and L4).

RESULTS

Healing of the drill hole defects, which simulate the first stage of fracture healing, was neither qualitatively nor quantitatively influenced by ibandronate. The same was true for the activation of cortical remodeling that occurs in the later stage of fracture healing, which started in Week 4 after surgery and declined after Week 8 in all groups. Additionally, no difference was found between the various regimens and the controls with respect to DEXA analyses, trabecular bone volume, cancellous bone tissue area, cancellous bone perimeter, osteoclast count, serum osteocalcin, or bone-specific alkaline phosphatase.

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, the presence of the first and second steps of fracture healing and the fact that the histological features closely resemble those of fracture repair validate the development and characterization of a new model for simulation of fracture repair. A long-term study with a therapeutically active dose of ibandronate shows that ibandronate does not impair BMD, bone structure, bone repair, coupling, and serum parameters for bone formation and turnover after long-term administration.

Hypercalcemia of malignancy

Less than 25 years ago tumor-induced hypercalcemia was often a lethal complication of cancer. Nowadays, it can be treated easily and successfully in at least 90% of cases by volume repletion in addition to the use of bisphosphonates that are potent anti-osteoclastic compounds. The standard therapy consists of the administration of 90 mg pamidronate or, more recently, 4 mg zoledronic acid, a more efficient bisphosphonate. When available, another alternative bisphosphonate is ibandronate. Recurrent hypercalcemia is nevertheless difficult to control and antibodies against parathyroid hormone-related protein could be useful for that matter in selected patients who are not in the terminal stage of their disease. Prevention of tumor-induced hypercalcemia is one of the objectives of long-term therapy with bisphosphonates in patients with tumor bone disease. The use of bisphosphonates in placebo-controlled trials has shown that the incidence of hypercalcemic episodes is reduced by more than one half.

Safety and Convenience of a 15‐Minute Infusion of Zoledronic Acid

Skeletal morbidity, including hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM), places a severe burden on patients with advanced cancers. Bisphosphonates effectively correct HCM and reduce skeletal morbidity in patients with bone metastases. However, with the widespread use of bisphosphonates, the safety and convenience of therapy are emerging concerns. The delivery of effective doses of early bisphosphonates required a lengthy 24-hour i.v. infusion protocol because of renal tolerability issues. The introduction of more potent bisphosphonates with superior tolerability profiles has allowed therapy to be safely delivered via shorter i.v. infusions. Intravenous therapy with etidronate, clodronate, pamidronate, ibandronate, and zoledronic acid has been used to treat HCM and skeletal complications in cancer patients. Of these therapies, zoledronic acid (which can be safely administered via a 15-minute i.v. infusion) is the most convenient and effective and has demonstrated an excellent safety profile with long-term use. Zoledronic acid has also received the broadest regulatory approval of any bisphosphonate and can be used to treat HCM or bone lesions secondary to multiple myeloma and a wide variety of solid tumors, including breast, prostate, and lung cancers. In addition to the patient preference for shorter infusion times, the 15-minute i.v. infusion protocol of zoledronic acid can provide benefits for infusion centers by potentially increasing patient throughput.

Statins prevent bisphosphonate-induced gamma,delta-T-cell proliferation and activation in vitro

The acute phase response is the major adverse effect of intravenously administered N-BPs. In this study we show that N-BPs cause gamma,delta-T-cell activation and proliferation in vitro by an indirect mechanism through inhibition of FPP synthase, an effect that can be overcome by inhibiting HMG-CoA reductase with a statin. These studies clarify the probable initial cause of the acute phase response to N-BP drugs and suggest a possible way of preventing this phenomenon.

INTRODUCTION

The acute phase response is the major adverse effect of intravenously administered nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate drugs (N-BPs), used in the treatment of metabolic bone diseases. This effect has recently been attributed to their action as non-peptide antigens and direct stimulation of gamma,delta-T-cells. However, because N-BPs are potent inhibitors of farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) synthase, they could cause indirect activation of gamma,delta-T-cells owing to the accumulation of intermediates upstream of FPP synthase in the mevalonate pathway, such as isopentenyl diphosphate/dimethylallyl diphosphate, which are known gamma,delta-T-cell agonists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from healthy volunteers and treated with N-BP, statin, or intermediates/inhibitors of the mevalonate pathway for 7 days in the presence of interleukin (IL)-2. Flow cytometric analysis of the T-cell-gated population was used to quantify the proportion of gamma,delta-T-cells in the CD3+ population.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The ability of N-BPs to stimulate proliferation of CD3+ gamma,delta-T-cells in human PBMC cultures matched the ability to inhibit FPP synthase. Gamma,delta-T-cell proliferation and activation (interferon gamma [IFNgamma] and TNFalpha release) was prevented by mevastatin or lovastatin, which inhibit HMG-CoA reductase upstream of FPP synthase and prevent the synthesis of isopentenyl diphosphate/dimethylallyl diphosphate. Desoxolovastatin, an analog of lovastatin incapable of inhibiting HMG-CoA reductase, did not overcome the stimulatory effect of N-BP. Furthermore, statins did not prevent the activation of gamma,delta-T-cells by a synthetic gamma,delta-T-cell agonist or by anti-CD3 antibody. Together, these observations show that N-BPs indirectly stimulate the proliferation and activation of gamma,delta-T-cells caused by inhibition of FPP synthase and intracellular accumulation of isopentenyl diphosphate/ dimethylallyl diphosphate in PBMCs. Because activation of gamma,delta-T-cells could be the initiating event in the acute phase response to bisphosphonate therapy, co-administration of a statin could be an effective approach to prevent this adverse effect.

Androgen-independent prostate cancer--the clinical problem of a growing pelvic tumour

This retrospective study describes three clinically different groups of patients with symptomatic androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC) referred to palliative radiotherapy (RT): those with a symptomatic pelvic tumour and pelvis-confined disease (M0 P-RT: 35 patients), those with a symptomatic pelvic tumour and distant metastases (M + P-RT: 97 patients) and those with painful bone metastases (BM-RT: 193 patients). The study emphasises the need of a combined surgical and radiotherapeutic palliation in AIPC patients with symptomatic pelvic tumours. Median overall survival from time of palliative RT was 19, 9 and 8 months for M0 P-RT, M + P-RT and BM-RT patients, respectively (p < 0.001). The significantly prolonged natural course of P-RT patients without distant metastases has to be accounted for in clinical trials of AIPC patients in whom survival represents an endpoint. Furthermore, the optimal palliation regimens for P-RT patients are still to be defined.

The use of zoledronic acid, a novel, highly potent bisphosphonate, for the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy

BACKGROUND

Hypercalcemia of malignancy is a serious complication of cancer that affects patients with and without bone metastases. A single infusion of pamidronate disodium, a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, effectively normalizes serum calcium in the majority of patients treated for up to 1 month. Zoledronic acid is a new-generation, heterocyclic nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate and the most potent inhibitor of bone resorption identified to date.

METHODS

The natural history, clinical presentation, and treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy are reviewed, with a focus on the mechanisms of action and relative efficacy and safety of bisphosphonate therapies.

RESULTS

The improved efficacy of zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate disodium has been demonstrated in a pooled analysis of two randomized clinical trials in patients with hypercalcemia of malignancy. In these trials, both zoledronic acid and pamidronate disodium were safe and well tolerated; however, zoledronic acid treatment resulted in a significantly higher number of complete responses, more rapid calcium normalization, and more durable responses compared with pamidronate disodium.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the superior efficacy and comparable safety profile of zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate disodium, zoledronic acid is likely to become the treatment of choice for hypercalcemia of malignancy.

Bisphosphonate therapy in multiple myeloma: past, present, future

Bone disease characterised by osteolytic lesions, pathological fractures and hypercalcaemia is an important clinical feature in multiple myeloma. Pain, decreased performance status, and the need for palliative radiotherapy and surgical interventions are common sequelae. Bisphosphonates act primarily on osteoclasts to inhibit excessive bone resorption, and have therefore been investigated in myeloma patients to ameliorate the clinical consequences of the bone disease. Bisphosphonates are currently the therapy of choice in myeloma patients with hypercalcaemia. In long-term management, both oral clodronate and intravenous pamidronate are effective in reducing skeletal-related events. Zoledronic acid seems to be as effective as pamidronate. Whether bisphosphonates have antimyeloma activity is currently unknown. Cost-benefit analyses have shown reasonable efficacy with acceptable costs. Bisphosphonate therapy is now accepted as an important part of care in myeloma patients, although much still has to be learned in order to optimise this therapy in multiple myeloma.

Clodronate: mechanisms of action on bone remodelling and clinical use in osteometabolic disorders

Clodronate (CI2MBP) is a non-aminated bisphosphonate that inhibits bone resorption. Studies on the mechanisms of action of this molecule on bone metabolism have been limited and only recently has information on the molecular machinery that underlies its effects on the bone remodelling process become available. Pharmacological and clinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of clodronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and in all conditions of excessive bone resorption, such as Paget's disease, hypercalcaemia of malignancy and osteolytic metastases. Clodronate is the only bisphosphonate currently available on the market for both oral and parenteral administration. Treatment with clodronate via intramuscular administration of doses of 100 mg/week has shown significant effects on bone mineral density after 6 months in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis and these effects are maintained 3 years after the start of the treatment. In a recent controlled clinical study, a significant increase in bone mineral density was observed, associated with a 46% reduction in the incidence of vertebral fractures. However, most relevant studies have been small, unblinded and short-term and have not systematically examined the effects of the dose and dosing intervals on bone mineral density and markers of bone turnover. Ongoing controlled clinical studies may offer answers regarding potential use of clodronate in osteoporosis and also about dosage of intermittent administration. This review summarises the accumulated knowledge in the mechanisms of action of clodronate on bone remodelling. Moreover, the clinical trials on the use of clodronate in metabolic bone diseases are described in-depth. We believe that this work will help to better focus on the need for more research on a compound which has potential applications in prevention and therapy of osteoporosis. However, studies that demonstrate an effect on the rate of fractures are needed before any recommendation can be made.

Treatment of malignant hypercalcaemia

Hypercalcaemia is a common paraneoplastic syndrome caused by the production by tumours of several factors which affect bone resorption and/or tubular calcium reabsorption. Antihypercalcaemic therapy in cancer patients involves rehydration manoeuvres, as well as the use of a variety of available drugs which inhibit bone resorption, namely plicamycin, calcitonin, bisphosphonates and gallium nitrate. While plicamycin is currently out of use because of its considerable toxicity, bisphosphonates have become the standard therapy in hypercalcaemia of malignancy (HM). These compounds are potent inhibitors of bone resorption but they do not affect tubular calcium reabsorption, which limits their efficacy in humoral HM (HHM) cases. In these patients, gallium nitrate should be the therapy of choice. Among the available bisphosphonates, pamidronate administered in a single infusion of 90 mg, normalises serum calcium levels in > 90% of HM patients. A recently introduced bisphosphonate, zoledronate, is likely to replace pamidronate as a first-line therapy in these patients. The effectiveness of calcitonin in HM treatment is limited, although it seems to be useful at the outset in cases with severe symptomatic hypercalcaemia. Future treatment options of HM are likely to include new bone resorption inhibitors, for example, naturally-occurring osteoprotegerin, or alternate approaches aimed at reducing the tumour production of parathyroid hormone-related protein with noncalcaemic analogues of calcitriol or ras-isoprenylation inhibitors. The development of putative therapeutic agents targeted to inhibit distal calcium reabsorption should be valuable in the management of HHM cases.

Is there a dose response relationship for clodronate in the treatment of tumour induced hypercalcaemia?

Eighty-six patients with tumour induced hypercalcaemia were randomised to 600, 900, 1200 or 1500 mg of intravenous clodronate, according to post hydration serum calcium levels. Sixty-seven were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 49.3% (95% CI: 36.8-61.8) with no significant difference in response rates, i.e. achievement of normocalcaemia at days 6-9 (corrected serum calcium < or =2.6 mmol l(-1)) across all groups.

The role of bisphosphonates in breast cancer management: review article

Bone metastases are a common problem in the management of breast cancer and are associated with considerable morbidity. Bone pain, hypercalcaemia, fractures and cord compression all occur requiring interventions such as analgesia, radiotherapy and surgery. Bisphosphonates are drugs that are active in the bone microenvironment. Their effects on osteoclasts are well described: they potently inhibit osteoclast mediated bone resorption by delaying the maturation of immature osteoclasts and by directly inducing osteoclast apoptosis. It has been known for some time that bisphosphonates, in combination with intravenous rehydration, effectively treat hypercalcaemia associated with solid malignancies. It has now been demonstrated In clinical trials in breast cancer patients that regular bisphosphonate administration reduces the morbidity associated with osteolytic skeletal metastases. There is an emerging suggestion from clinical trial work that bisphosphonates may be able to reduce or delay the development of skeletal metastases although this remains controversial as the three published trials present conflicting results. The more potent third-generation bisphosphonates, such as zoledronate, are now being tested for each of these indications with promising results and may replace other bisphosphonates in the future. Laboratory studies have recently demonstrated that bisphosphonates have direct cytotoxic effects against breast cancer cells in vitro, inducing apoptosis and preventing adhesion to bone. This adds support to the hypothesis that bisphosphonates may have a genuine beneficial effect in the adjuvant setting.

Novel therapeutic approaches to cancer patients with bone metastasis

Bone metastases are a common event in advanced cancer. Breast, lung, prostate and thyroid neoplasms have striking osteotropism. Bone metastatic cancer may be associated with catastrophic consequences for the patients. Therefore, new strategies are warranted in order to reduce the incidence of bone metastases and to palliative established skeletal disease. External beam radiation therapy, endocrine treatments, chemotherapy, bisphosphonates and radioisotopes are all important. Bisphosphonates have become the treatment of choice for tumor-induced hypercalcaemia and more recently they have been used alone or in combination with cytotoxic agents in the palliative treatment of patients with bone metastases. The results are encouraging. Currently, new bisphosphonates that are a hundred times more powerful with respect to clodronate and pamidronate are under investigation. The treatment of metastases to bone and mechanisms of pain relief after radiation therapy are poorly understood. Up to date, there are not standard criteria for the irradiation of bone metastases and bone pain relief may be reached using a variety of fractionation schemes. Radionuclide therapy is the systemic use of radioisotopes for bone pain. It is currently regarded as suitable for comparison with wide-field irradiation, but appears to have major disadvantages in terms of pain relief and toxicity.

Current and future directions in medical therapy: hypercalcemia

BACKGROUND

Tumor-induced hypercalcemia (TIH) is essentially due to a marked stimulation of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. An inhibition of bone formation and an enhanced tubular reabsorption of calcium play an important contributory role. These factors explain why serum calcium often rises rapidly in cancer patients and why high doses of bisphosphonates are needed to normalize bone resorption and to overcome the contributory role of the kidney.

METHODS

The author provides a short review of clinical trials in hypercalcemic cancer patients, with an emphasis on the most recent trials.

RESULTS

Rehydration and bisphosphonates now constitute the standard treatment of TIH. A single-day 1500-mg infusion of clodronate achieves normocalcemia in approximately 80% of the cases. Clodronate also can be given by subcutaneous infusion that can be particularly useful in the palliative setting. A dose of 90 mg of pamidronate achieves normocalcemia in more than 90% of the patients and has a longer-lasting effect than clodronate. Newer more potent bisphosphonates, such as ibandronate and zoledronate, may improve these results, and they certainly will simplify the therapeutic schemes. Ibandronate at the dose of 6 mg normalizes serum calcium in more than 75% of the patients with moderate or severe hypercalcemia. Of note, the same doses of pamidronate and ibandronate, repeated monthly for 1-2 years, have been shown to substantially reduce the skeletal morbidity rate in normocalcemic patients with tumor bone disease. Even lower doses of zoledronate, the most potent bisphosphonate tested so far, are able to correct TIH when administered as a 30-minute infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Bisphosphonates have become the standard treatment for cancer hypercalcemia. Success is achieved in more than 90% of the cases. Other classes of compounds are being tested for their antiosteoclastic activity, and animal studies suggest that osteoprotegerin could be as efficient and act faster than bisphosphonates.

Bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Myelomatosis is associated with considerable skeletal morbidity, particularly bone pain and fractures. Hypercalcaemia is a common presenting feature but less common after adequate chemotherapy. These complications are caused by progressive focal and generalized osteolysis due, in turn, to increased activation of osteoclasts by osteoclast activating factors. These include tumor necrosis factor-beta, interleukin-1, and interleukin-6. The knowledge that disturbed bone remodeling is due to the activation of authentic osteoclasts provides the rationale for the use of bisphosphonates in myelomatosis.

METHODS

This article reviews the place of bisphosphonates in the management of myeloma.

RESULTS

There is good evidence that hypercalcaemia can be corrected with intravenous or oral bisphosphonates, and they are now the specific treatment of choice. Several studies have shown that their intravenous administration is beneficial in the acute management of bone pain due to malignancy, but studies in myelomatosis are lacking. In contrast, a number of well designed controlled studies have shown significant effects of long term treatment with clodronate and pamidronate to decrease the incidence of skeletal complications in myelomatosis. Benefits reported are a decreased incidence of bone pain, hypercalcaemia, vertebral and long-bone fractures, and the extension of osteolytic lesions. There may be a beneficial effect on survival, but this is much less certain.

CONCLUSIONS

These agents provide a valuable adjunct to the management of myelomatosis.

Comparative tolerability of drug therapies for hypercalcaemia of malignancy

The bisphosphonates are the treatment of choice in hypercalcaemia of malignancy. However, plicamycin (mithramycin) an calcitonin treatment may still be of value should bisphophonate treatment fail, and gallium nitrate has recently been introduced as an alternative therapy. We analysed the tolerability of different treatments based on articles identified in a Medline search covering the period 1979 through September 1998. Articles were included if they met two criteria: (i) quantitative assessment of adverse effects; (ii) inclusion of > or = 10 patients. Although bisphosphonates are generally well tolerated, elevation of serum creatinine level, nausea/vomiting and fever have been reported following their application. Patients receiving etidronate (n = 268) or clodronate (n = 127) more frequently experienced creatinine elevation (8 and 5%, respectively) than did patients receiving pamidronate (n = 424; 2%), aledronate (n = 79; 0%), or ibandronate (n = 203; <1%). The difference in the frequency of reported creatinine level elevations reached statistical significance only for etidronate (z-test: p < 0.001 versus pamidronate; p < 0.02 versus alendronate; p < 0.001 versus ibandronate). With regard to the frequency of creatinine level elevations, clodronate treatment did not differ significantly from treatment with pamidronate, alendronate and ibandronate. An exception among the bisphosphonates is tiludronate, which has been reported on s a treatment of hypercalcaemia in only 1 study (n = 19) resulting in 1 case of lethal and 1 case of manageable acute renal failure. Nausea and vomiting are rare adverse effects of bisphosphonate treatment but seem to be more frequent with first generation drugs: etidronate (8%) and clodronate (7%) versus pamidronate (2%) [p < 0.001 and 0.009, respectively] and versus ibandronate (<1%) [p< 0.002 and 0.02, respectively]. Bisphosphonates containing a nitrogen atom were associated with an acute phase reaction leading to reported fever in 16% of pamidronate, 20% of aledronate, and 11% of ibandronate-treated patients. The most frequently reported adverse effects of treatment with the cytostatic drug plicamycin were hepatotoxicity (26%), nausea/vomiting (23%), and serum creatinine level elevation (5%). Furthermore. plicamycin application was associated with bone marrow suppression and a bleeding tendency due to abnormalities in multiple clotting factors and platelet dysfunction. The use of calcitonin is limited more by the short duration of its therapeutic effect than by toxicities (most frequent: nausea/vomiting in 16% of treated cases). The few publications on gallium nitrate in the treatment of hypercalcaemia of malignancy characterise it as an efficient drug, which is, however, associated with a higher frequency of renal toxicity (10%) and of nausea and vomiting (14%) than are the bisphosphonates.

Clodronate: a review of its use in breast cancer

Like other members of its class, the bisphosphonate clodronate (clodronic acid) inhibits bone resorption. The efficacy of oral clodronate 1600 mg/day in reducing the incidence of skeletal complications and metastasis development has been assessed in several clinical trials in patients with breast cancer. Long term use of oral clodronate significantly reduced the total cumulative incidence of skeletal events (including fractures, hypercalcaemia, and the need for radiotherapy for bone pain) compared with that in placebo recipients in 2 randomised double-blind placebo-controlled studies, each involving >100 patients. Significant differences in favour of clodronate were also seen in the frequency of some individual skeletal events in 1 trial. A nonblind trial in 302 patients considered to be at high risk of developing metastases found that, at a 3-year follow-up, significantly fewer patients who received clodronate for 2 years developed skeletal metastases than those in a control group. Clodronate recipients were also significantly less likely than controls to develop visceral metastases, and had significantly higher survival rates. A smaller double-blind placebo-controlled study in women with recurrent breast cancer found that clodronate significantly decreased the total number of new skeletal metastases, but not the number of patients who developed them. In a nonblind trial in 299 patients with node-positive breast cancer, however, the incidence of skeletal metastases did not differ significantly between patients who received clodronate for 3 years and those in a control group. In addition, clodronate recipients had a significantly greater incidence of nonskeletal metastases (local and visceral), and significantly lower survival rates. Intravenous or oral clodronate has been well tolerated in clinical trials. The most common adverse effects reported were mild gastrointestinal disturbances such as nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea. All these events were transient, and usually resolved without stopping treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Clodronate is a well tolerated bisphosphonate, available in both oral and intravenous forms, that significantly reduces the incidence of skeletal complications associated with breast cancer. Further research is needed to establish more clearly its efficacy in reducing metastasis development, to assess its efficacy compared with other bisphosphonates, and to determine which patients will benefit most from treatment. Currently, clodronate is probably most effective in the treatment and prevention of general skeletal complications in patients with breast cancer.

Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study of oral ibandronate in patients with metastatic bone disease

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates are an important component of the treatment of metastatic bone disease but more potent, oral formulations are required to improve the effectiveness and convenience of treatment. An oral formulation of the new bisphosphonate, ibandronate (BM 21.0955) has recently been developed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred ten patients with bone metastases (77 breast, 16, prostate, 3 myeloma, 14 others) were recruited from a single institution to this double blind placebo-controlled evaluation of four oral dose levels (5, 10, 20 and 50 mg) of ibandronate. No changes in systemic anti-cancer treatment were allowed in the month before commencing treatment or during the study period. After an initial four-week tolerability phase, patients could continue on treatment for a further three months without unblinding; patients initially allocated to placebo received ibandronate 50 mg. The primary endpoint was urinary calcium excretion (UCCR). Bone resorption was also assessed by measurement of pyridinoline (Pyr), deoxypyridinoline (Dpd), and the N-terminal (NTX) and C-terminal (Crosslaps) portions of the collagen crosslinking molecules.

RESULTS

Two patients did not receive any trial medication thus, 108 patients were evaluable for safety. Ninety-two patients were evaluable for efficacy. A dose dependent reduction was observed in both UCCR and collagen crosslink excretion. At the 50 mg dose level, the percentage reductions from baseline in UCCR, Pyr, Dpd, Crosslaps and NTX were 71%, 28%, 39%, 80% and 74% respectively. One or more gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events occurring in the first month of treatment were reported by six (30%), seven (33%), nine (39%), nine (41%) and eleven (50%) patients at the placebo, 5, 10, 20 and 50 mg dose levels respectively. One patient (20 mg dose) developed radiographically confirmed oesophageal ulceration. GI tolerability may have been adversely affected by concomitant administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Nine (8%) patients stopped treatment within the first month due to GI intolerability but these patients were evenly distributed across the five treatment groups. There was no difference in non-GI adverse events between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral ibandronate has potent effects on the rate of bone resorption at doses which are generally well tolerated. Further development is appropriate to evaluate the effects of long-term administration in the prevention of metastatic bone disease and the management of established skeletal metastases.

Economic impact of using clodronate in the management of patients with multiple myeloma

The economic impact of using prophylactic clodronate as an adjunct to chemotherapy in the management of multiple myeloma for the first 4 years following diagnosis was established from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS). A state-transition model of the course of multiple myeloma was constructed using the MRC VI myelomatosis trial results and information on patient management obtained retrospectively from clinical trialists. Data were collected on resource use and corresponding costs for standard management and managing severe hypercalcaemia, vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. Managing patients with prophylactic clodronate cost the NHS a mean 22 934 pound silver per patient; comprising 16 697 pounds silver for standard management, 4862 pound silver for clodronate therapy and 1376 pound silver for adverse events. Managing patients without prophylactic clodronate cost a mean 19 557 pound silver (16 697 pound silver and 2860 pound silver for standard management and adverse events respectively). Therefore prophylactic clodronate therapy increased the cost by 3377 pound silver, or 17% per patient. Hospitalization accounted for 32% of the total cost, whereas chemotherapy accounted for 5%. The results were robust to sensitivity analyses (range 2605 pound silver-4150 pound silver). Further studies are required to assess the impact of prophylactic clodronate on quality of life to enable the clinical benefits and additional cost of this treatment to be compared with other healthcare interventions.

The role of bisphosphonates for the treatment of bone disease in multiple myeloma

Palliative therapy is often a major objective for clinicians while treating advanced cancer. This is particularly true in multiple myeloma (MM), where bone involvement markedly influences the quality of life of patients. Bisphosphonates (BP) are a new class of drugs regulating bone turnover, which exert their activity mainly by inhibiting osteoclast bone resorption. Three BP (etidronate, ETD; clodronate, CDN; pamidronate, PMD) have so far been investigated in the clinical setting for treating bone disease in patients with MM. The results of these trials, including our own experience, are reviewed here. Although all three BP were effective in lowering hypercalcemia of MM patients, PMD, a second generation BP, clearly had the most substantial long term clinical benefits regarding bony complications, pain and quality of life. CDN also showed some activity in reducing the development of new lytic lesions, while no significant beneficial effect was seen in patients using ETD. Interestingly, some studies have reported an improved survival in subsets of MM patients receiving BP and this is in agreement with recent evidence of possible direct anti-neoplastic activities of these drugs mediated through reduction of IL-6 production and stimulation of neoplastic cell apoptosis.

Hypercalcaemia in patients with cancer: aetiology and treatment

Hypercalcaemia is one of the most common disorders occurring in patients with cancer and may have disabling symptoms. The mechanisms underlying hypercalcaemia associated with malignant disease, the symptoms attributable to and the treatment of this disorder are discussed in this paper.

A randomized trial of the effect of clodronate on skeletal morbidity in multiple myeloma. MRC Working Party on Leukaemia in Adults

In patients with multiple myeloma, despite a major reduction of bone pain achieved with chemotherapy, skeletal disease continues to progress. The effects of clodronate, an inhibitor of osteoclastic bone resorption, are evaluated on the natural history of skeletal disease in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Within the framework of the VIth MRC Multiple Myeloma Trial, 536 patients (218 women, 318 men) with recently diagnosed multiple myeloma were randomized to receive either clodronate 1600 mg daily (n=264) or an outwardly identical placebo (n=272) in addition to chemotherapy. Treatment with clodronate was associated with a 50% decrease in the proportion of patients with severe hypercalcaemia (5.1% v 10.1%, P=0.06) and a similar reduction in reported non-vertebral fractures (6.8% v 13.2%, P=0.04). Fewer patients receiving clodronate sustained vertebral fractures after entry to the trial (38% v 55%, P=0.01) and patients also lost less height over 3 years compared to those receiving placebo (2.0 v 3.4 cm, P=0.01). Biochemical indices of bone turnover were significantly lower in patients receiving concomitant clodronate, both at plateau and at disease relapse. The frequencies of back pain and poor performance status were significantly lower at 24 months in clodronate than in placebo-treated patients (10.9% v 19.9%, P=0.05, and 18.3% v 30.5% P=0.03 respectively.) There was no statistically significant difference in survival between the clodronate and placebo treated patients. The study indicates that long-term oral clodronate slows the progression of skeletal disease in multiple myeloma and decreases the associated morbidity. Patients without overt skeletal disease at diagnosis were also found to benefit from clodronate, indicating that this treatment should be initiated as early in the course of the disease as possible.

A randomized, controlled trial of intravenous clodronate in patients with metastatic bone disease and pain

To evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous clodronate in ameliorating refractory bone pain in patients with metastatic bone disease, 60 patients with established osseous metastases and persistent bone pain were randomized to receive either clodronate (600 mg or 1500 mg in 500 mL of normal saline) or 500 mL of saline as placebo. After 2 weeks, the patients were crossed over to receive the alternate treatment. After another 2 weeks, each patient and investigator made a blinded choice. Daily visual analogue scales (VAS) and analgesic diaries were recorded throughout the study period. Forty-six patients were evaluable (77%). A treatment x period interaction was identified in the VAS and daily morphine equivalent dose (DMED) scores. First period analysis of the VAS scores for general pain, pain at rest, and pain upon movement demonstrated an average reduction of 13, 14, and 24 mm, respectively, from baseline, but were not significantly different from changes following placebo. The average change in DMED was -6.4 (SE = 2.9) following clodronate and was +24.6 (SE = 14.9) following placebo (p = 0.03). In the blinded choice of which agent resulted in improvement in pain, 26 (57%) patients chose clodronate, 12 (26%) chose placebo, and eight (17%) had no preference (p = 0.0021). For the investigators who also made a blinded selection, clodronate was chosen in 30 (65%) patients, placebo in ten (22%) patients, and no difference was apparent in six (13%) (p < 0.0001). Intravenous clodronate appeared to have analgesic effect in patients with refractory bone pain due to metastatic bone disease. The optimal dose and duration of effect require further evaluation, particularly in patients with stable disease and persistent bone pain.

Dose-response study of ibandronate in the treatment of cancer-associated hypercalcaemia

Hypercalcaemia is an important cause of morbidity in malignant disease. We studied the efficacy and safety of intravenous ibandronate (a new, potent bisphosphonate) in a multicentre study of 147 patients with severe cancer-associated hypercalcaemia which had been resistant to treatment with rehydration alone. Of 131 randomized patients who were eligible for evaluation, 45 were allocated to receive 2 mg ibandronate, 44 patients to receive 4 mg and 42 patients to receive 6 mg. Serum calcium values fell progressively in each group from day 2, reaching a nadir at day 5, and in some patients normocalcaemia was maintained for up to 36 days after treatment. The 2-mg dose was significantly less effective than the 4-mg or 6-mg dose in correcting hypercalcaemia, as the number of patients who achieved serum calcium values below 2.7 mM after treatment was 50% in the 2-mg group compared with 75.6% in the 4-mg group and 77.4% in the 6-mg group (P < 0.05; 2 mg vs others). In a logistic regression analysis, three factors were found to predict response; ibandronate dose (higher doses were more effective), severity of presenting hypercalcaemia (severe hypercalcaemia was associated with less complete response) and tumour type (patients with breast carcinoma and haematological tumours responded better than those with other tumours). Ibandronate was generally well tolerated and no serious drug-related adverse events were observed. We conclude that ibandronate is a safe, well tolerated and effective treatment for cancer-associated hypercalcaemia, which should prove a useful addition to the current range of therapies available to treat this condition.

Short-term intravenous bisphosphonates in prevention of postmenopausal bone loss

This study was performed to test the efficacy of short-term intravenous clodronate and etidronate in the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss. Healthy postmenopausal women, exhibiting a decreasing trend in bone mineral density, were randomized to five groups (clodronate at doses of 150, 300, and 600 mg; etidronate at a dose of 300 mg; and a placebo group) of 21-22 subjects. The drugs were administered intravenously three times with 1-week intervals, followed by regular evaluation for up to 24 months. During the first year, 300 mg of clodronate retarded bone loss significantly in the lumbar spine and femoral neck, where significant protection still persisted after 24 months. Other doses of clodronate (150 and 600 mg) were not bone protective. Etidronate (300 mg) retarded bone loss significantly in the lumbar spine up to 24 months, relative to placebo. Serum concentrations of procollagen I carboxy-terminal propeptide and urinary Ca2+ and hydroxyproline excretion decreased in all bisphosphonate groups during the first month after treatment, but the values returned later toward baseline. In the etidronate-group, serum osteocalcin concentrations also decreased significantly during the first 3 months of the study. Otherwise, no uniform serum responses to bisphosphonate-treatment were detected in circulating markers of bone formation, alkaline phosphatase, or osteocalcin. No significant differences in the serum concentrations of cross-linked carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen were detected between the groups. Patient acceptance of both bisphosphonates was excellent, and no drug-related adverse side effects were detected. These results suggest that infrequently repeated intravenous treatment with bisphosphonates may effectively counteract postmenopausal bone loss.

Administration of the bisphosphonate ibandronate (BM 21.0955) by intravenous bolus injection

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are used for the treatment of both benign and malignant diseases characterized by increased bone resorption. Because of their potential nephrotoxicity, currently available BPs have to be administered by slow intravenous infusion, with conventional doses requiring an infusion time of at least 2 h. In the present investigation, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the new BP ibandronate as administered by intravenous bolus injection. On day 0, 15 normocalcemic breast cancer patients with bone metastases were treated with 3 mg of ibandronate injected intravenously over 60-120 s. Ibandronate treatment led to significant decreases in serum levels of calcium (p < 0.0001) and phosphate (p < 0.0001) and to subsequent increases in serum concentrations of parathyroid hormone (p <0.0001) and calcitriol (p <0.0001). Moreover, there was a significant reduction in the urinary excretion of calcium (p <0.0001), pyridinoline (p <0.001), and deoxypyridinoline (p < 0.0001). Three serious adverse events were observed: vomiting (WHO grade 3), pulmonary infection (WHO grade 2), and deterioration of a pre-existing impaired glucose tolerance (WHO grade 3). Only vomiting appeared to be related to administration of the drug. The most frequent nonserious adverse events were 10 cases of transient clinically asymptomatic hypocalcemia and 8 cases of asymptomatic hypophosphatemia. Serum levels of creatinine and urea nitrogen did not increase, nor did creatinine clearance deteriorate. When tested with the dipstick method, proteinuria was present in five (33%) patients prior to ibandronate treatment (median protein concentration, 30 mg/dl). Following the BP injection, seven (47%) patients showed slight (highest protein concentration, 30 mg/dl) transient proteinuria at at least one time point, of which six cases appeared in conjunction with leucocyturia and three with microhematuria. Side effects specific to aminosubstituted BPs (fever, reduction in white blood cell counts, and lymphocyte counts) were not seen in these 15 patients. In conclusion, a single intravenous injection of 3 mg of ibandronate significantly inhibited osteoclast activity as reflected by the decrease in serum calcium and in urinary parameters of bone resorption. Serum creatinine levels and estimates of creatinine clearance were not affected by therapy. However, before repeated bolus injections of ibandronate at this dosage can be recommended for further clinical trials, whether a relationship exists between the transient pathological urinary findings and injected ibandronate needs to be determined.

Rationale for the use of bisphosphonates in breast cancer

The variability of different breast cancers in the susceptibility to metastatic bone disease is poorly understood. Factors that determine the viability of metastatic cells are also poorly understood, but may depend in part upon gene expression of PTHrP and the vitamin D receptor. In contrast, much more is known of the manner in which metastatic breast disease affects bone remodelling to induce osteolytic bone disease. Mechanisms include a generalized increase in activation frequency at sites close to metastatic tissue, an imbalance between the amount of bone formed and that resorbed within resorption cavities, and uncoupling of bone formation from bone resorption. The greatest morbidity from metastatic bone disease arises from osteolytic disease and gives rise to hypercalcaemia, bone pain and fractures. Since osteolysis is primarily mediated by the activation of osteoclasts, there has been a great deal of interest in the use of agents which primarily affect bone metabolism to alter the natural history of metastatic bone disease. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents and cytotoxic agents are capable of inducing responses in bone, but are limited by their toxicity when effective doses are utilized. The use of calcitonin in the long-term suppression of osteolysis has also been disappointing. The bisphosphonates are, however, capable of inducing sustained decreases in osteoclast activity and numbers in patients with osteolytic bone disease. There are now several studies which have examined the effects of the bisphosphonates on skeletal morbidity in breast cancer. Both clodronate and pamidronate decrease the incidence of hypercalcaemia, bone pain and pathological fractures, but do not significantly alter mortality. Given, however, the unchanging survival in patients with metastatic bone disease, significant improvements in the quality of remaining life is an important therapeutic effect.

The bisphosphonate ibandronate, given daily as well as discontinuously, decreases bone resorption and increases calcium retention as assessed by 45Ca kinetics in the intact rat

The new bisphosphonate ibandronate was given at various doses and regimens to normal growing rats, and its effect on calcium metabolism investigated by means of 45Ca kinetics. The bisphosphonate began to inhibit bone resorption at a dose of 0.1 microgram P/kg, given daily. At higher doses intestinal calcium absorption, calciuria and calcium balance were also increased, calcemia being decreased. There was no difference in effect when the same amount of compound was given either daily for 10 days or all at once. Furthermore, the effect of a high dose of 100 micrograms P/kg was present 1 month after a single administration, whereas a dose 10 times lower was no longer effective. These results suggest that ibandronate may be effective in humans for decreasing bone resorption and increasing calcium balance in osteoporosis, when given either daily or discontinuously.

The future of bisphosphonates in cancer

Bisphosphonates, in conjunction with rehydration, are now the treatment of choice for hypercalcaemia of malignancy. They can also relieve bone pain and improve quality of life as single agent therapy and, in conjunction with systemic anticancer treatments, can prevent skeletal complications and slow down the metastatic process. The clinical effects are greatest and most clearly defined in breast cancer and multiple myeloma, but, theoretically, clinical benefit should be achievable across the entire spectrum of metastatic bone disease. The new biochemical markers for measuring bone resorption are for the first time providing a direct assessment of the effects of treatment on bone. It is hoped that they will enable a more scientific selection of the type, dose and schedule of bisphosphonate required for the best compromise between efficacy, convenience and patient acceptability. We can expect to see a rapid increase in the use of bisphosphonates in malignancy (especially breast cancer and myeloma). Careful assessment of the health-care economics of this new treatment modality is urgently needed.

A randomised double-blind comparison of intravenous pamidronate and clodronate in the hypercalcaemia of malignancy

In conjunction with rehydration, the bisphosphonates are the treatment of choice for hypercalcaemia of malignancy. Single infusions of either pamidronate or clodronate are usually effective, but a direct comparison of the two agents given at the highest doses commonly used has not been performed. Forty-one patients (15 breast, 12 squamous carcinomas, four lymphomas, four bladder, two prostate and four others) with hypercalcaemia of malignancy (corrected serum calcium > 2.7 mmol l-1) persisting after 48 h of saline rehydration were randomly allocated to receive a 4 h intravenous (i.v.) infusion of either pamidronate 90 mg or clodronate 1500 mg. No other systemic anti-cancer treatment was prescribed. There were no significant differences in the post-hydration serum calcium values (mean 3.17 mmol l-1 for pamidronate and 3.06 mmol l-1 for clodronate), tumour type or frequency of bone metastases between the two treatments. One patient on each treatment died within 2 days and was not assessable for response. A total of 19/19 (100%) patients achieved normocalcaemia following pamidronate and 16/20 (80%) with clodronate. The median time to achieve normocalcaemia was 4 days (range 2-14) for pamidronate and 3 days (range 2-6) with clodronate. The median duration of normocalcaemia was 28 days (range 10-28+ days) after pamidronate and 14 days after clodronate (range 7-21 days) (P < 0.01). Two patients who failed to respond to clodronate were successfully treated with pamidronate and achieved normocalcaemia for 14 and > 28 days respectively. Two patients experienced fever after pamidronate but no significant toxicity was observed with either treatment. We conclude that both agents are effective in the management of hypercalcaemia of malignancy. At the doses studied, the effects of pamidronate are more complete and longer lasting than those of clodronate.

Use of clodronate in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma is characterized by bone disease including osteoporosis, osteolytic lesions, pathological fractures and hypercalcaemia leading to pain, immobilization and decrease in the quality of life. Clodronate, a bisphosphonate, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of hypercalcaemia in patients with multiple myeloma. In addition, clodronate reduces the progression of osteolytic lesions and the amount of vertebral fractures and may also relieve pain in these patients. Recent studies suggest that oral clodronate should be considered in the adjunctive treatment of all patients with active multiple myeloma independently of the presence of bone lesions at diagnosis. Due to its safety and efficacy, clodronate seems to have gained an important role in the management of patients with multiple myeloma.

Bone and cancer: pathophysiology and treatment of metastases

The variability of different primary tumors in the susceptibility to metastatic bone disease is poorly understood. Factors that determine the viability of metastatic cells are also poorly understood, but may depend in part upon gene expression of PTHrP and the vitamin D receptor. In contrast, much more is known of the manner in which metastatic disease affects bone remodeling to induce osteolytic bone disease. Mechanisms include a generalized increase in activation frequency at sites close to metastatic tissue, an imbalance between the amount of bone formed and that resorbed within resorption cavities, and uncoupling of bone formation from bone resorption. The greatest morbidity from metastatic bone disease arises from osteolytic disease and gives rise to hypercalcemia, bone pain, and fractures. Because osteolysis is primarily mediated by the activation of osteoclasts, there has been a great deal of interest in the use of agents which primarily affect bone metabolism to alter the natural history of metastatic bone disease. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents and cytotoxic agents are capable of inducing responses in bone, but are limited by their toxicity when effective doses are utilized. The use of calcitonin in the long-term suppression of osteolysis has also been disappointing. The bisphosphonates are, however, capable of inducing sustained decreases in osteoclast activity and numbers in patients with osteolytic bone disease. There are now several studies which have examined the effects of the bisphosphonates on skeletal morbidity in breast cancer. Both clodronate and pamidronate decrease the incidence of hypercalcemia, bone pain, and pathological fractures, but do not significantly alter mortality.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acute effects of bisphosphonates on new and traditional markers of bone resorption

Bisphosphonates are known to be potent inhibitors of osteoclast activity and their only clinically relevant effect in the short-term is the selective inhibition of bone resorption. The purpose of this study was to compare the response to the intravenous administration of two bisphosphonates, clodronate and alendronate, of several biochemical markers of bone resorption, including tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and cross-linked carboxyterminal telopeptide of collagen I (ICTP) in serum and hydroxyproline (OHP), free pyridinium cross-links (Pyr), and cross-linked N-telopeptides of collagen I (NTx) in urine. The study was carried out on 11 osteoporotic and 12 Pagetic subjects of both sexes, treated with clodronate (600 mg/day for 2 days) or alendronate (5 mg/day for 2 days), and monitored for 28 days after bisphosphonate administration. All the urinary markers of bone resorption showed a prompt decline after bisphosphonates, with maximum reductions after 7-14 days: Pyr decreased by 43% +/- 9% and 42% +/- 22% (mean +/- SD), respectively in osteoporotic and pagetic subjects, OHP by 51% +/- 14% and 51% +/- 20%, and NTx by 55% +/- 15% and 65% +/- 26%. In the osteoporotic group, the urinary markers began to increase again at 30 days, though still remaining well below the basal level, whereas in the pagetic group, the excretion of all markers remained depressed until the end of the observation period. The reduction of NTx was significantly greater than that of Pyr and OHP in pagetic patients (P < 0.05) and tended to be greater than that of Pyr in osteoporotic patients (p = 0.07).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clodronate and other bisphosphonates as supportive therapy in osteolysis due to malignancy

Clodronate, one of the most investigated bisphosphonates, has been clinically utilised for over 10 years in malignancy. It is the most used, most effective and safest drug in the treatment of hypercalcaemia. It inhibits lytic bone destruction, prevents bone fractures and relieves bone pain. Supportive clodronate therapy may even reduce hypercalcaemia mortality and the morbidity caused by osteolysis. These results have stimulated studies on the patients' quality of life. New methods for the measurement of bone resorption, such as the degradation product of type I collagen (ICTP), may improve the possibility of monitoring the effect of clodronate. Comparative studies with different bisphosphonates in hypercalcaemia and long-term controlled trials using bisphosphonates as supportive therapy in osteolysis due to malignancy are reviewed.

Clodronate. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in resorptive bone disease

Clodronate (clodronic acid, dichloromethylene bisphosphonate) is a bisphosphonate which has demonstrated efficacy in patients with a variety of diseases of enhanced bone resorption including Paget's disease, hypercalcaemia of malignancy and osteolytic bone metastases. In addition, early reports demonstrating potential efficacy of clodronate in the treatment of osteoporosis suggest a possible role in this debilitating disease. Short term intravenous administration (usually 300 mg/day for 5 days) or longer courses of oral clodronate (usually 1600 mg/day for 6 months) effectively reduced bone pain and/or improved mobility in most patients with Paget's disease, and these effects persisted for up to 12 months after discontinuing clodronate. When administered intravenously (300 mg/day for up to 12 days) to patients with malignant hypercalcaemia, serum calcium levels declined significantly within 2 days of starting treatment and approximately 70 to 95% of patients became normocalcaemic. While there is less experience with oral administration, clodronate (800 to 3200 mg/day) achieved normocalcaemia in the majority of patients, usually within 1 week, and serum calcium levels remained significantly reduced from baseline for up to 6 months with continued treatment. Clodronate is clearly superior to placebo and, based on a retrospective analysis, appears to produce greater and more sustained reductions in serum calcium levels than calcitonin in patients with malignant hypercalcaemia. The few available prospective comparative trials showed that clodronate is at least as effective as etidronate, but comparisons with alendronate and pamidronate produced results of questionable clinical relevance because of low bisphosphonate dosages used in these trials. Nevertheless, single intravenous doses of clodronate 600 mg or alendronate 7.5 mg (both agents repeated on day 3 if necessary) were comparable in efficacy, whereas a single intravenous dose of pamidronate 30 mg was more effective than a single intravenous dose of clodronate 600 mg. Normocalcaemic patients with osteolytic bone metastases due to advanced breast cancer experienced significant reductions in the number of episodes of hypercalcaemia and terminal hypercalcaemia, incidence of vertebral fractures and overall rate of morbid events, including the need for radiotherapy to treat bone-related pain, following treatment with clodronate 1600 mg/day for 3 years in a large placebo-controlled study. A similar large placebo-controlled trial in patients with multiple myeloma demonstrated that clodronate 2400 mg/day orally for 2 years significantly reduced progression of osteolytic bone lesions. Follow-up data from clinical trials revealed that the effects on development of fractures and hypercalcaemia persisted for at least 12 months after the drug was discontinued.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)