In vitro antitumour activity of cis- and trans-5-fluoro-5,6-dihydro-6-alkoxy-uracils; effects on thymidylate synthesis

Increased sensitivity to gemcitabine of P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated protein-overexpressing human cancer cell lines

Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) is a deoxycytidine analogue that is activated by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) to its monophosphate and subsequently to its triphosphate dFdCTP, which is incorporated into both RNA and DNA, leading to DNA damage. Multidrug resistance (MDR) is characterised by an overexpression of the membrane efflux pumps P-glycoprotein (P-gP) or multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP). Gemcitabine was tested against human melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, small-cell lung cancer, epidermoid carcinoma and ovarian cancer cells with an MDR phenotype as a result of selection by drug exposure or by transfection with the mdr1 gene. These cell lines were nine- to 72-fold more sensitive to gemcitabine than their parental cell lines. The doxorubicin-resistant cells 2R120 (MRP1) and 2R160 (P-gP) were nine- and 28-fold more sensitive to gemcitabine than their parental SW1573 cells, respectively (P<0.01), which was completely reverted by 25 micro M verapamil. In 2R120 and 2R160 cells, dCK activities were seven- and four-fold higher than in SW1573, respectively, which was associated with an increased dCK mRNA and dCK protein. Inactivation by deoxycytidine deaminase was 2.9- and 2.2-fold decreased in 2R120 and 2R160, respectively. dFdCTP accumulation was similar in SW1573 and its MDR variants after 24 h exposure to 0.1 micro M gemcitabine, but dFdCTP was retained longer in 2R120 (P<0.001) and 2R160 (P<0.003) cells. 2R120 and 2R160 cells also incorporated four- and six-fold more [(3)H]gemcitabine into DNA (P<0.05), respectively. P-glycoprotein and MRP1 overexpression possibly caused a cellular stress resulting in increased gemcitabine metabolism and sensitivity, while reversal of collateral gemcitabine sensitivity by verapamil also suggests a direct relation between the presence of membrane efflux pumps and gemcitabine sensitivity.

Mechanisms of synergism between cisplatin and gemcitabine in ovarian and non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines

2',2'-Difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine, dFdC) and cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum (cisplatin, CDDP) are active agents against ovarian cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). CDDP acts by formation of platinum (Pt)-DNA adducts; dFdC by dFdCTP incorporation into DNA, subsequently leading to inhibition of exonuclease and DNA repair. Previously, synergism between both compounds was found in several human and murine cancer cell lines when cells were treated with these drugs in a constant ratio. In the present study we used different combinations of both drugs (one drug at its IC25 and the other in a concentration range) in the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780, its CDDP-resistant variant ADDP, its dFdC-resistant variant AG6000 and two NSCLC cell lines, H322 (human) and Lewis lung (LL) (murine). Cells were exposed for 4, 24 and 72 h with a total culture time of 96 h, and possible synergism was evaluated by median drug effect analysis by calculating a combination index (CI; CI < 1 indicates synergism). With CDDP at its IC25, the average CIs calculated at the IC50, IC75 IC90 and IC95 after 4, 24 and 72 h of exposure were < 1 for all cell lines, indicating synergism, except for the CI after 4 h exposure in the LL cell line which showed an additive effect. With dFdC at its IC25, the CIs for the combination with CDDP after 24 h were < 1 in all cell lines, except for the CIs after 4 h exposure in the LL and H322 cell lines which showed an additive effect. At 72 h exposure all CIs were < 1. CDDP did not significantly affect dFdCTP accumulation in all cell lines. CDDP increased dFdC incorporation into both DNA and RNA of the A2780 cell lines 33- and 79-fold (P < 0.01) respectively, and tended to increase the dFdC incorporation into RNA in all cell lines. In the AG6000 and LL cell lines, CDDP and dFdC induced > 25% more DNA strand breaks (DSB) than each drug alone; however, in the other cell lines no effect, or even a decrease in DSB, was observed. dFdC increased the cellular Pt accumulation after 24 h incubation only in the ADDP cell line. However, dFdC did enhance the Pt-DNA adduct formation in the A2780, AG6000, ADDP and LL cell lines (1.6-, 1.4-, 2.9- and 1.6-fold respectively). This increase in Pt-DNA adduct formation seems to be related to the incorporation of dFdC into DNA (r = 0.91). No increase in DNA platination was found in the H322 cell line. dFdC only increased Pt-DNA adduct retention in the A2780 and LL cell lines, but decreased the Pt-DNA adduct retention in the AG6000 cell line. In conclusion, the synergism between dFdC and CDDP appears to be mainly due to an increase in Pt-DNA adduct formation possibly related to changes in DNA due to dFdC incorporation into DNA.

Combination chemotherapy studies with gemcitabine and etoposide in non-small cell lung and ovarian cancer cell lines

Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine, dFdC) and etoposide (4'-demethylepipodo-phyllo-toxin-9-4,6-O-ethylidene-beta-D-g lucopyranoside, VP-16) are antineoplastic agents with clinical activity against various types of solid tumors. Because of the low toxicity profile of dFdC and the differences in mechanisms of cytotoxicity, combinations of both drugs were studied in vitro. For this purpose, we used the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780, its cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum-resistant and VP-16 cross-resistant variant ADDP, and two non-small cell lung cancer cell lines, Lewis Lung (LL, murine) and H322 (human). The interaction between the drugs was determined with the multiple drug effect analysis (fixed molar ratio) and with a variable drug ratio. In the LL cell line, the combination of dFdC and VP-16 at a constant molar ratio (dFdC:VP-16 = 1:4 or 1:0.125 after 4- or 24-hr exposure, respectively) was synergistic (combination index [CI], calculated at 50% growth inhibition = 0.7 and 0.8, respectively; CI <1 indicating synergism). After 24- and 72-hr exposure to both drugs at a constant ratio, additivity was found in the A2780, ADDP, and H322 cell lines (dFdC:VP-16 = 1:500 for both exposure times in these cell lines). When cells were exposed to a combination of dFdC and VP-16 for 24 or 72 hr, with VP-16 at its IC25 and dFdC in a concentration range, additivity was found in both the LL and H322 cells; synergism was observed in the A2780 and ADDP cells, which are the least sensitive to VP-16. Schedule dependency was found in the LL cell line; when cells were exposed to dFdC 4 hr prior to VP-16 (constant molar ratio, total exposure 24 hr), synergism was found (CI = 0.5), whereas additivity was found when cells were exposed to VP-16 prior to dFdC (CI = 1.6). The mechanism of interaction between the drugs was studied in more detail in the LL cell line; dFdCTP accumulation was 1.2-fold enhanced by co-incubation with VP-16, and was even more pronounced (1.4-fold) when cells were exposed to VP-16 prior to dFdC. dCTP levels were decreased by VP-16 alone as well as by the combination of both compounds, which may favor phosphorylation of dFdC, thereby increasing dFdCTP accumulation. DNA strand break (DSB) formation was increased for exposure to both compounds together compared to exposure to each compound separately, this effect being most pronounced when cells were exposed to VP-16 prior to dFdC (38% and 0% DSB for dFdC and VP-16 alone, respectively and 97% DSB for the combination). The potentiation in DSB formation might be a result of the inhibition of DNA repair by dFdC. Provided the right schedule is used, VP-16 is certainly a compound eligible for combination with dFdC.

Biochemical mechanisms of interferon modulation of 5-fluorouracil activity in colon cancer cells

The antiproliferative effect of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in colon cancer can be enhanced by interferons (IFN-alpha and IFN-gamma). The mechanisms by which IFNs modulate 5-FU activity are not completely elucidated. IFN-alpha may elevate the levels of the active 5-FU metabolite 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine-5'-monophosphate (FdUMP) in the cell, possibly leading to increased inhibition of the target enzyme thymidylate synthase (TS), which might enhance DNA damage. It has been shown that IFN-gamma can prevent 5-FU induced overexpression of TS. We studied IFN modulation in three colon cancer cell lines (SW948, WiDr, human; C26-10, murine) and the sublines WiDr/F and C26-10/F, which were adapted to low folate levels. A 1.5-fold increase in 5-FU sensitivity was observed in C26-10 and C26-10/F (by murine IFN-alpha, beta); in SW948, WiDr and WiDr/F (by human IFN-gamma) and in SW948 and WiDr/ F (by human IFN-alpha). In none of the cell lines did human IFN-alpha, IFN-gamma or murine IFN-alpha, beta increase FdUMP levels after exposure to 5-FU. TS activity, indirectly measured by incorporation of [6-3H]-deoxyuridine into DNA, was inhibited by 5-FU, but the IFNs did not enhance inhibition. DNA damage was measured as a drug-induced decrease of double-stranded (dss) DNA compared to control cells. After 5-FU exposure, dss DNA decreased to 60-75% in WiDr, WiDr/F and SW948 cells. Human IFN-alpha alone caused minimal DNA damage (95% dss DNA), but increased 5-FU-induced effects to 35-50% dss DNA. IFN-gamma did not cause DNA damage and did not enhance 5-FU-mediated DNA damage. Expression of TS protein, analysed by ELISA, was increased after 5-FU exposure of SW948 cells, but this increase was not affected by addition of either IFN-alpha or IFN-gamma. It is concluded that one of the mechanisms involved in modulation of 5-FU activity is the effect of IFN-alpha on 5-FU-mediated DNA damage, but for IFN-gamma no mechanism of action was found.

18F-radiopharmacokinetics of [18F]-5-fluorouracil in a mouse bearing two colon tumors with a different 5-fluorouracil sensitivity: a study for a correlation with oncological results

The tissue distribution and biodynamics of 18F-labelled 5-fluorouracil (FU) are described and studied for correlation with its in vivo antitumor activity. The in vivo model consisted of Balb/c mice bearing a FU sensitive (Colon 26-10 carcinoma) tumor in the left and a less responsive (Colon 26 carcinoma) tumor in the right abdominal side of the animal. Distribution and efflux of 18F-label from tumor, blood, and other tissues were determined by obduction at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 h postintravenous injection. For a comparison, the 18F-labeled 5-fluoro-6-hydroxy and cis-5-fluoro-6-ethoxy uracil adducts were studied in the same in vivo model. For 18F-FU it was found that the 18F-label tumor kinetics rapidly fell into a biphasic mode: a relatively short 18F beta phase (18F t1/2 beta 21 +/- 3 min), linked with the total body metabolic capacity and clearance of the animal, and a longer 18F gamma phase, linked with the intrinsic intratumoral FU metabolism (Colon 26-10: 18F t1/2 gamma 10.3 h; Colon 26: 18F t1/2 gamma 5.6 h). It is proposed that the observed faster 18F efflux of the less responsive Colon 26 corresponds to an enhanced breakdown of 5-fluoronucleotides to 5-fluoronucleosides and subsequent elimination from the tumor cells. It is concluded that on PET scanning, measurement of the dynamic 18F t1/2 gamma and 18F t1/2 beta parameter is of prime importance for an insight in the in vivo tumor biology of a patient.

Modulation of metabolism and cytotoxicity of cytosine arabinoside with N-(phosphon)-acetyl-L-aspartate in human leukemic blast cells and cell lines

Cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) activation to cytosine arabinoside triphosphate (Ara-CTP) and subsequent incorporation into DNA is regulated by the pyrimidine nucleotides UTP, CTP and dCTP. Inhibition of the de novo synthesis of these pyrimidine nucleotides by N-(phosphon)-acetyl-L-aspartate (PALA) may enhance the cytotoxicity of Ara-C. We therefore studied the effect of PALA on Ara-C cytotoxicity and on Ara-CTP accumulation and incorporation into DNA on cell lines and patient samples. Fifty micromolar PALA increased the growth inhibitory effect of Ara-C in U937 cells several fold both with pre- and coincubation. Ara-C cytotoxicity was not potentiated by PALA in Hl60 cells. However, coincubation with PALA did not enhance Ara-CTP accumulation both in HL60 and U937 cells, nor affect Ara-C incorporation into DNA. Ara-C cytotoxicity to leukemic blast cells from 11 untreated patients with different types of leukemia was only modulated to a small extent by high PALA concentrations in only two cases. Ara-CTP accumulation in leukemic blast cells varied from non-detectable levels to 200 pmol/10(6) cells. Fifty micromolar PALA enhanced the accumulation of Ara-CTP significantly in only one patient with no apparent effect on UTP and CTP levels. Raising PALA to 500 microM decreased UTP and CTP levels to 50% but had no effect on Ara-CTP levels. In conclusion, modulation by PALA of Ara-C cytotoxicity and metabolism is limited in leukemic cells, both in culture and from patients. This suggests the possibility for selective modulation of other agents by PALA on non-hematological cells.

Addition of leucovorin in modulation of 5-fluorouracil with methotrexate: potentiating or reversing effect?

Potentiation of the anti-tumor activity of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) by methotrexate (MTX) and leucovorin (LV) requires careful scheduling to achieve the most favorable interactions between these 3 drugs. In vitro the triple combination of MTX/5FU/LV was tested at 4 time intervals and with 3 MTX concentrations in 3 cell lines. MTX/5FU/LV was never superior to both 5FU/LV and MTX/5FU, moreover LV reduced growth inhibition by MTX/5FU in 2 cell lines. MTX/5FU was associated with only moderately increased levels of the 5FU metabolite FdUMP, while LV/5FU reduced the free FdUMP levels. MTX/LV/5FU had a dual effect and FdUMP levels gave no clear indication regarding the anti-proliferative effect that could be expected. In vivo the time-dependent potentiation of MTX on the 5FU anti-tumor activity was confirmed for the treatment of HNX-14C-bearing mice. Addition of LV to the MTX/5FU combination failed to cause a gain in anti-tumor efficacy. For the treatment of Colon-26-bearing mice, MTX/5FU was comparable to LV/5FU, but the triple combination of MTX/LV/5FU seemed to have a better anti-tumor effect. However, the toxicity of the latter treatment was greater than that of LV/5FU. The data from both in vitro and in vivo experiments failed to support the addition of LV to MTX/5FU therapy, possibly due to a reversing effect of LV.