A controlled trial of adjuvant tamoxifen, with or without prednisolone, in post-menopausal women with operable breast cancer

The Immunomodulatory Effects of Dexamethasone on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The immunomodulatory impact of corticosteroids and concurrent chemotherapy is poorly understood within triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). On a biochemical level, steroids have been linked to the signaling of chemotherapy-resistant pathways. However, on a clinical level, steroids play an essential role in chemotherapy tolerance through the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and hypersensitivity reactions. Given these conflicting roles, we wanted to evaluate this interplay more rigorously in the context of early-stage TNBC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with operable TNBC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) between January 2012 and November 2018, with the primary goal of examining the dose-dependent relationship between pathological complete response (pCR) rates and corticosteroid use. Secondary endpoints included the impact of steroid dosing on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), along with a breakdown in pCR rates based on steroid doses provided during each chemotherapy phase. Further adjusted analyses were performed based on patient age, diabetic status, and anatomical stage. Finally, we explored the relationship between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) seen on tissue samples at baseline and dexamethasone doses in terms of pCR rates.

RESULTS

In total, of the 174 patients screened within this study period, 116 met full eligibility criteria. Of these eligible patients, all were female, with a median age of 51.5 years (27.0 to 74.0) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.7 [standard deviation (SD) 7.04]. The majority were nondiabetic (80.2%). For cancer stage, 69.8% (n = 81) had stage 2 breast cancer. We found no statistically significant association between pCR rates and dexamethasone use, both in terms of the total dose (p = 0.55) and mean dose per NAC cycle (p = 0.74). Similarly, no difference was noted when adjusting for diabetic status, metformin use, or age at diagnosis, regardless of the total steroid dose provided (p = 0.72) or mean dose per cycle (p = 0.49). No meaningful changes to pCR rate were seen with higher mean or higher total steroid doses during the paclitaxel (T) phase (adjusted p = 0.16 and p = 0.76, respectively) or doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) phase (adjusted p = 0.83 and p = 0.77, respectively). Furthermore, we found no clinically significant association between dexamethasone dose and either RFS (p = 0.45) or OS (p = 0.89). Of the 56 patients who had available pre-treatment biopsy tissue samples, 27 achieved pCR, with higher TILs at baseline being associated with higher pCR rates, regardless of the mean dexamethasone dose used.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that dexamethasone has no clinically significant impact on pCR, RFS, or OS when given concurrently with NAC in patients with curative TNBC, regardless of diabetic status.

Effect of glucocorticoid use on survival in patients with stage I-III breast cancer

PURPOSE

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are commonly used in breast cancer patients to ameliorate emesis induced by chemotherapy. Some preclinical studies have suggested that systemic GCs might promote survival of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer cells. This study aims to clarify their clinical effect on patient survival.

METHODS

A total of 18,596 women with newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer in 2002-2006 were identified from the Taiwan Cancer Database and drug treatment was examined from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Claims Database. Of these, 3989 who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (non-chemotherapy cohort) and 3237 patients who received six cycles of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy (anthracycline cohort) were included. The impact of GC use on survival was analyzed separately in these two cohorts using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

In the non-chemotherapy cohort, GC use was associated with aggressive clinicopathological features of breast cancer. High-dose GC was associated with shorter overall survival in univariate analysis but not in multivariate analysis. In the anthracycline cohort, multivariate analysis showed that GC use at each dose level was significantly associated with longer breast cancer-specific survival (HR 0.65, 0.70, and 0.70 for low-dose, median-dose, and high-dose GC, respectively) and overall survival (HR 0.72, 0.76, and 0.73, respectively) when compared with those receiving no GC. The associations were significant in both ER-positive and ER-negative subgroups for breast cancer-specific survival, and in ER-negative subgroup for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant use of GC improved survival in patients receiving adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy for stage I-III breast cancer.

Systematic review of the clinical effect of glucocorticoids on nonhematologic malignancy

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoids are often used in the treatment of nonhematologic malignancy. This review summarizes the clinical evidence of the effect of glucocorticoid therapy on nonhematologic malignancy.

METHODS

A systematic review of clinical studies of glucocorticoid therapy in patients with nonhematologic malignancy was undertaken. Only studies having endpoints of tumor response or tumor control or survival were included. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Register/Databases, conference proceedings (ASCO, AACR, ASTRO/ASTR, ESMO, ECCO) and other resources were used. Data was extracted using a standard form. There was quality assessment of each study. There was a narrative synthesis of information, with presentation of results in tables. Where appropriate, meta-analyses were performed using data from published reports and a fixed effect model.

RESULTS

Fifty four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one meta-analysis, four phase l/ll trials and four case series met the eligibility criteria. Clinical trials of glucocorticoid monotherapy in breast and prostate cancer showed modest response rates. In advanced breast cancer meta-analyses, the addition of glucocorticoids to either chemotherapy or other endocrine therapy resulted in increased response rate, but not increased survival. In GI cancer, there was one RCT each of glucocorticoids vs. supportive care and chemotherapy +/- glucocorticoids; glucocorticoid effect was neutral. The only RCT found of chemotherapy +/- glucocorticoids, in which the glucocorticoid arm did worse, was in lung cancer. In glucocorticoid monotherapy, meta-analysis found that continuous high dose glucocorticoids had a detrimental effect on survival. The only other evidence, for a detrimental effect of glucocorticoid monotherapy, was in one of the two trials in lung cancer.

CONCLUSION

Glucocorticoid monotherapy has some benefit in breast and prostate cancer. In advanced breast cancer, the addition of glucocorticoids to other therapy does not change the long term outcome. In GI cancer, glucocorticoids most likely have a neutral effect. High dose continuous glucocorticoids have a detrimental effect in nonhematologic malignancy. Glucocorticoid therapy might have a deleterious impact in lung cancer.

The effect of tibolone in postmenopausal women receiving tamoxifen after surgery for breast cancer: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of tibolone on climacteric symptoms, endometrium and serum lipid/lipoproteins in postmenopausal women receiving tamoxifen after surgery for breast cancer.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre pilot study.

SETTING

Hospital outpatient clinic.

SAMPLE

Seventy postmenopausal women receiving tamoxifen following surgery for early breast cancer.

METHODS

Women received 20 mg/day oral tamoxifen plus either 2.5 mg/day oral tibolone or placebo for 12 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Frequency and severity of hot flushes (diary cards); intensity of hot flushes and sweats (Landgren scale); interference of hot flushes and sweats with normal life; frequency and intensity of other climacteric symptoms; endometrial thickness and histology; vaginal bleeding; breast cancer recurrence and serum lipid/lipoproteins.

RESULTS

Daily card data showed no change in the daily number of hot flushes with either tibolone or placebo (P= 0.219) after three months. There was a significant reduction in the severity of flushes with tibolone compared with placebo (-0.4 vs 0.2, P= 0.031). The Landgren scale showed a mean change in the number of hot flushes of -0.6 with tibolone and +1.1 with placebo after 12 months (P= 0.022). Endometrial biopsies were normal and vaginal bleeding was similar in both groups. A significant decrease in triglycerides (-23% vs 1.4%) and HDL (-12% vs 19%) was seen with tibolone compared with placebo after 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Tibolone prevented an increase in hot flushes in postmenopausal women given tamoxifen following surgery for breast cancer without untoward effects on the endometrium. Beneficial effects on serum lipid profile were noted.

Estradiol inhibits glucocorticoid receptor expression and induces glucocorticoid resistance in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells

Our study has shown that treatment of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells with 17-beta estradiol (E(2)) produced significant decreases in glucocorticoid receptor (GR) concentrations and GR mRNA levels. E(2) pre-treatment of MCF-7 cells stably transfected with the GR responsive pMTV-CAT reporter (MCF-7-MTV cells), caused significant attenuation of dexamethasone (DEX)-induced chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT). In MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with [(GRE)(3)-Luc] reporter plasmid, E(2) pre-treatment significantly suppressed DEX-induced luciferase, which was abolished by the estrogen receptor antagonist ICI 182,780. We examined the effect of chronic E(2) treatment as well as E(2) withdrawal on GR function and abundance. MCF-7-MTV cells were treated with vehicle (control) or E(2) for up to 16 days. A third group received E(2) for 5 days followed by E(2) withdrawal from day 6 to 16. Chronic E(2) treatment almost totally abrogated DEX-induced CAT and reduced GR to very low levels. Interestingly, in the group subjected to E(2) withdrawal, neither the DEX response nor GR abundance recovered and reached control values suggesting that the estrogen mediated suppression is long lasting and could not be easily reversed. The E(2) induced resistance to glucocorticoid action may be of potential clinical significance in a number of settings including breast cancer, neuroendocrine response to stress and osteoporosis and could possibly contribute to the differences in glucocorticoid responsiveness among patients.

The influence on survival of delay in the presentation and treatment of symptomatic breast cancer

The aim of this study was to examine the possible influence on survival of delays prior to presentation and/or treatment among women with breast cancer. Duration of symptoms prior to hospital referral was recorded for 2964 women who presented with any stage of breast cancer to Guy's Hospital between 1975 and 1990. Median follow-up is 12.5 years. The impact of delay (defined as having symptoms for 12 or more weeks) on survival was measured from the date of diagnosis and from the date when the patient first noticed symptoms to control for lead-time bias. Thirty-two per cent (942/2964) of patients had symptoms for 12 or more weeks before their first hospital visit and 32% (302/942) of patients with delays of 12 or more weeks had locally advanced or metastatic disease, compared with only 10% (210/2022) of those with delays of less than 12 weeks (P < 0.0001). Survival measured both from the date of diagnosis (P < 0.001) and from the onset of the patient's symptoms (P = 0.003) was worse among women with longer delays. Ten years after the onset of symptoms, survival was 52% for women with delays less than 12 weeks and 47% for those with longer delays. At 20 years the survival rates were 34% and 24% respectively. Furthermore, patients with delays of 12-26 weeks had significantly worse survival rates than those with delays of less than 12 weeks. Multivariate analyses indicated that the adverse impact of delay in presentation on survival was attributable to an association between longer delays and more advanced stage. However, within individual stages, longer delay had no adverse impact on survival. Analyses based on 'total delay (i.e. the interval between a patient first noticing symptoms and starting treatment) yielded very similar results in terms of survival to those based on delay to first hospital visit (delay in presentation).