Feasibility, endocrine and anti-tumour effects of a triple endocrine therapy with tamoxifen, a somatostatin analogue and an antiprolactin in post-menopausal metastatic breast cancer: a randomized study with long-term follow-up

Phase I Study of the Prolactin Receptor Antagonist LFA102 in Metastatic Breast and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

LESSONS LEARNED

Despite evidence for a role for prolactin signaling in breast and prostate tumorigenesis, a prolactin receptor-binding monoclonal antibody has not produced clinical efficacy.Increased serum prolactin levels may be a biomarker for prolactin receptor inhibition.Results from the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics (PD) studies suggest that inappropriately long dosing intervals and insufficient exposure to LFA102 may have resulted in lack of antitumor efficacy.Based on preclinical data, combination therapy of LFA102 with those novel agents targeting hormonal pathways in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and metastatic breast cancer is promising.Given the PD evidence of prolactin receptor blockade by LFA102, this drug has the potential to be used in conditions such as hyperprolactinemia that are associated with high prolactin levels.

BACKGROUND

Prolactin receptor (PRLR) signaling is implicated in breast and prostate cancer. LFA102, a humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds to and inhibits the PRLR, has exhibited promising preclinical antitumor activity.

METHODS

Patients with PRLR-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) received doses of LFA102 at 3-60 mg/kg intravenously once every 4 weeks. Objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended dose for expansion (RDE) to investigate the safety/tolerability of LFA102 and to assess pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and antitumor activity.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients were enrolled at 5 dose levels. The MTD was not reached because of lack of dose-limiting toxicities. The RDE was established at 60 mg/kg based on PK and PD analysis and safety data. The most common all-cause adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (44%) and nausea (33%) regardless of relationship. Grade 3/4 AEs reported to be related to LFA102 occurred in 4% of patients. LFA102 exposure increased approximately dose proportionally across the doses tested. Serum prolactin levels increased in response to LFA102 administration, suggesting its potential as a biomarker for PRLR inhibition. No antitumor activity was detected.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with LFA102 was safe and well tolerated, but did not show antitumor activity as monotherapy at the doses tested.

Promoter hypermethylation-related reduced somatostatin production promotes uncontrolled cell proliferation in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin (SST) has anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects. Our aims were to analyze and compare the SST expression during normal aging and colorectal carcinogenesis at mRNA and protein levels. Furthermore, we tested the methylation status of SST in biopsy samples, and the cell growth inhibitory effect of the SST analogue octreotide in human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line.

METHODS

Colonic samples were collected from healthy children (n1 = 6), healthy adults (n2 = 41) and colorectal cancer patients (CRCs) (n3 = 34) for SST mRNA expression analysis, using HGU133 Plus2.0 microarrays. Results were validated both on original (n1 = 6; n2 = 6; n3 = 6) and independent samples ((n1 = 6; n2 = 6; n3 = 6) by real-time PCR. SST expressing cells were detected by immunohistochemistry on colonic biopsy samples (n1 = 14; n2 = 20; n3 = 23). The effect of octreotide on cell growth was tested on Caco-2 cell line. SST methylation percentage in biopsy samples (n1 = 5; n2 = 5; n3 = 9) was defined using methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme digestion.

RESULTS

In case of normal aging SST mRNA expression did not alter, but decreased in cancer (p < 0.05). The ratio of SST immunoreactive cells was significantly higher in children (0.70% ± 0.79%) compared to CRC (0% ± 0%) (p < 0.05). Octreotide significantly increased the proportion of apoptotic Caco-2 cells. SST showed significantly higher methylation level in tumor samples (30.2% ± 11.6%) compared to healthy young individuals (3.5% ± 1.9%) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In cancerous colonic mucosa the reduced SST production may contribute to the uncontrolled cell proliferation. Our observation that in colon cancer cells octreotide significantly enhanced cell death and attenuated cell proliferation suggests that SST may act as a regulator of epithelial cell kinetics. The inhibition of SST expression in CRC can be epigenetically regulated by promoter hypermethylation.

A review of the use of somatostatin analogs in oncology

Somatostatin is a neuropeptide produced by paracrine cells that are located throughout the gastrointestinal tract, lung, and pancreas, and is also found in various locations of the nervous system. It exerts neural control over many physiological functions including inhibition of gastrointestinal endocrine secretion through its receptors. Potent and biologically stable analogs of somatostatin have been developed. These somatostatin analogs show different efficacy on different receptors, and receptors are varyingly concentrated in specific tissues. Antitumor and antisecretory effects of somatostatin analogs in cancer have been shown in several in vivo and in vitro studies. However, these activities have not always yielded into clinically relevant patient outcome benefit. Somatostatin analogs are of clinical benefit in treating symptoms of ectopic hormone secretion (adrenocorticotropic hormone, growth hormone-releasing hormone) in lung cancer, without inducing a significant tumor response. They have also been shown to induce a statistically significant decrease in bone pain and increase in Karnofsky performance status in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Somatostatin analogs alone or in combination with other agents have only limited antitumoral effect in breast cancer. In gastrointestinal cancers, studies have not shown an objective tumor response to somatostatin analogs except in endocrine tumors of the liver with symptomatic and biochemical improvement. In neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal system and pancreas, very high symptomatic and biochemical response rates have been achieved with somatostatin analogs. Antiproliferative activity has been clearly shown in metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors.

Molecular pathways: blockade of the PRLR signaling pathway as a novel antihormonal approach for the treatment of breast and prostate cancer

The prolactin (PRL)-prolactin receptor (PRLR) signaling complex has been implicated in the pathology of breast and prostate carcinoma. A multitude of pro-oncogenic intracellular signaling pathways are activated by PRL in breast and prostate epithelial cells, leading to enhanced cellular proliferation, survival, and tumorigenesis in numerous model systems. Emerging evidence suggests that targeting the PRL-PRLR axis in human cancer may represent an unexploited avenue for therapeutic intervention and, given the extensive cross-talk between PRLR and other signal transduction pathways, a potential means through which other anticancer agents could be rendered more efficacious in the clinic. LFA102 is a potent anti-PRLR neutralizing antibody that efficiently abrogates the function of this receptor in vivo, mediating significant antitumor effects in preclinical models. The clean safety profile of this antibody in animals and in the clinical experiences to date suggests that blocking the PRLR signaling pathway in human tumors may have few significant toxicologic consequences and may be a promising approach to treating cancer. A phase I trial in patients with breast and prostate cancer is underway to better understand the clinical utility of LFA102 and the contribution of PRL to the maintenance and progression of human cancer.

Somatostatin receptors in non-neuroendocrine malignancies: the potential role of somatostatin analogs in solid tumors

Somatostatin receptors (sstrs) are G-protein-coupled receptors that mediate various physiological effects when activated by the neuropeptide somatostatin or its synthetic analogs. In addition to the well-documented antisecretory effects of sstr2-preferential somatostatin analogs octreotide and lanreotide, ligand binding to sstr initiates an inhibitory action on tumor growth. This effect may result from both indirect actions (suppression of growth factors and growth-promoting hormones [e.g., GH/IGF-1 axis] and inhibition of angiogenesis) and direct actions (activation of antigrowth activities [e.g., apoptosis]). As solid tumor cells express multiple sstrs, there is a rationale to evaluate the potential antitumor effects of pasireotide (SOM230), a multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analog with high binding affinity for sstr1–3 and sstr5. Pasireotide reduces systemic IGF-1 levels more potently than currently available somatostatin analogs and has been well tolerated in clinical trials.

Future clinical prospects in somatostatin/cortistatin/somatostatin receptor field

Somatostatin receptors (sst), somatostatin (SS) and cortistatin (CST) are widely expressed in the various systems in the human and rodent organisms and are "responsible" for maintaining homeostasis, which is essential for survival. Because of their broad expression pattern sst, SS and CST interactions may play regulatory roles in both physiology and pathophysiology in mammalian organisms. SS analogue treatment strategies as well as the use of SS analogues for diagnostic purposes have been established in diseases of different origins. This review focuses on the currently determined role for SS analogues in today's clinical practice and the potential clinical prospects for SS, CST and sst interactions in the future, with a focus on neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumours and immune-mediated diseases. Moreover, the role of new SS analogues and new insights in sst physiology will be discussed.

Biology of somatostatin in breast cancer

The biological effects of the neuropeptide somatostatin (SST) are mediated via a family of five somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) belonging to a family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). SSTR regulate the secretion of hormones, growth factors, neurotransmission and cell growth in receptor-specific manner. In addition, SST plays an inhibitory role in several mammary cancer models. These effects are mediated both indirectly through inhibition of hormones and growth factors which promote tumor growth as well as directly via SSTRs present on tumor cells to inhibit mitogenic signaling of growth factor receptor kinases leading to growth arrest and induction of apoptosis. Here, we present an overview on the role of SST and its analogs in breast cancer.

Efficacy of the combination of long-acting release octreotide and tamoxifen in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised multicentre phase III study

To assess the efficacy of the combination of long-acting release (LAR) octreotide and tamoxifen (TMX) for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 109 patients with advanced HCC were randomised to receive octreotide LAR combined with TMX (n=56) (experimental treatment group) or TMX alone (n=53; control group). The clinical, biological and tumoural parameters were recorded every 3 months until death. Primary end point was patient survival; secondary end points were the impact of therapy on tumour response, quality of life and variceal bleeding episodes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for assessment of specific prognostic factors. The median survival was 3 months (95% CI 1.4-4.6) for the experimental treatment group and 6 months (CI 95% 2-10) for the control group (P=0.609). There was no difference in terms of alpha-foetoprotein (alpha-FP) decrease, tumour regression, improvement of quality of life and prevention of variceal bleeding between the two groups. Variables associated with a better survival in the multivariate analysis were: presence of cirrhosis, alpha-FP level <400 ng ml(-1) and Okuda stage I. The combination of octreotide LAR and TMX does not influence survival, tumour progression or quality of life in patients with advanced HCC.

Role of somatostatin analogs in the clinical management of non-neuroendocrine solid tumors

The somatostatin analogs octreotide, lanreotide and RC-160 (vapreotide) are known to have direct and indirect antitumor effects. Direct effects include the arrest of tumor growth and stimulation of apoptosis, resulting in tumor shrinkage. Indirect antiproliferative effects may occur through antiangiogenesis, immunomodulatory effects and the suppression of tumor-stimulating growth factors. With a safety profile of somatostatin analogs established over 20 years of clinical use in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors, somatostatin analogs are attractive therapeutic options for patients with non-neuroendocrine tumors. In early clinical trials of somatostatin analogs, however, some cancer patients responded well, while others showed a lack of benefit. This variability in clinical response may reflect the selective binding affinities of octreotide, lanreotide and RC-160, which bind with high affinity to just two of the five different somatostatin receptor subtypes. Treatment response may therefore depend on the specific receptor subtype(s) present in the tumor, the relative proportion of receptor(s) expressed on the tumor cell surface and the absolute quantity of each receptor subtype. Greater understanding of the role of somatostatin receptors, their binding affinities and modes of action has led to increased research into the use of somatostatin analogs, particularly octreotide, in cancer treatment as monotherapies, in combination with hormonal treatments and cytotoxic therapies, and in both adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. A review of the literature suggests that the antitumor potential of somatostatin analogs should be investigated further and additional studies might determine how these analogs can best be used to improve the treatment of patients with non-neuroendocrine tumors.

The oncogenic potential of growth hormone

A growing body of recent literature indicates that in addition to an essential role in growth and development, growth hormone may also play a more sinister role in oncogenic transformation and neoplastic progression. Here we review the accumulating evidence implicating growth hormone in the development and progression of cancer and describe what is known of the mechanisms utilised by this hormone in neoplastic transformation.

Effects of tamoxifen and octreotide LAR on the IGF-system compared with tamoxifen monotherapy

The insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-system was evaluated in 150 breast cancer patients participating in a randomised phase III trial comparing octreotide pamoate and tamoxifen with tamoxifen+placebo. Alterations in the IGF-system in the two treatment arms and individual changes with respect to outcome were compared. Serum IGF-I and -II, free IGF-I, and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1-3 (IGFBP1-3) were measured by radioimmmunoassay (RIA)/immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) and IGFBPs by Western ligand blots (WLB) before and during treatment. Combined treatment caused a higher increase in IGFBP-1 and larger suppression of total and free IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGFBP-3 (P<0.01 for all), but less suppression of IGFBP-2 (P<0.05) compared with tamoxifen monotherapy. An increase in IGFBP-2 25% was associated with decreased progression-free survival (PFS) in the total patient population and combined treatment group. Similar response rates and time to progression in the treatment arms suggests moderate suppression of circulating IGF-I has no influence on clinical outcome.

SOMATOSTATIN ANALOGUES AND ESTROGENS IN THE TREATMENT OF ANDROGEN ABLATION REFRACTORY PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA

PURPOSE

Prostate cancer progression to androgen ablation refractory stage D3 corresponds to cancer cell escape from androgen withdrawal induced apoptosis. Of note, salvage chemotherapy can extend the median survival of approximately 10 months in patients with stage D3. Therefore, novel therapeutic strategies that target the molecular basis of androgen resistance are required.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MEDLINE and Current Content databases were used to find studies of the use of estrogens and somatostatin analogues for D3 prostate adenocarcinoma. We also analyzed the rationale and clinical results of our combination therapy using lanreotide and ethinylestradiol.

RESULTS

Negative experiences have been reported with somatostatin analogues as monotherapy. On the other hand, the median progression-free survival reported in our experience using lanreotide acetate plus ethinylestradiol clearly surpassed the 10-month survival historically described in stage D3 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of somatostatin analogues in combination therapy for D3 prostate cancer sustains the novel concept in cancer treatment in which therapies may target not only cancer cells, but also the microenvironment in combination, which can confer protection from apoptosis.

The insulin-like growth factor system in advanced breast cancer

Despite improvements in therapy, the prognosis for advanced breast cancer is poor and a search for new treatment targets and key regulators of tumour growth is warranted. Extensive data are available on the importance of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system in growth regulation of breast cancer cell lines in vitro, indicating that the IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR), IGF-I (and IGF-II) function as survival factors, while IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3 may act as a growth inhibitor. There is a tight link between the growth regulatory pathways of IGFs and oestrogens in oestrogen-receptor(OR)-positive breast cancer cells. In vivo studies indicate a role of IGF-I and IGF-IR in breast cancer development. However, the importance of the IGF system in metastatic and highly aggressive breast tumours in vivo is not clear, and therapeutic strategies designed to interrupt IGF signalling have not yet proved to be an effective treatment modality in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

The GH-IGF-I axis and breast cancer

The growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor-I (GH-IGF-I) axis plays a fundamental role in the development of the breast. The maintenance of breast tissue architecture is aided by its effect on proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. There has been increasing recognition of its role as a major determinant of breast cancer and, more recently, its involvement in the development of resistance to both tamoxifen and an important novel therapy for advanced disease, trastuzumab (Herceptin). Here, we discuss the influence of the GH-IGF-I axis in normal mammary development and homeostasis, its putative role in breast tumorigenesis and its interactions with estrogen signalling.

Indium-111-octreotide scintigraphy, intraoperative gamma-detector localisation and somatostatin receptor expression in primary human breast cancer

12 women with primary breast cancer underwent somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) with 111In-DTPA-D-Phe1-octreotide. The tumour sizes varied between 2 and 5 cm and were all, except one, palpable at clinical examination. Tumour biopsies were taken with additional sampling from normal breast tissue, fat, muscle, axillary lymph nodes and peripheral blood. Ratios between the 111In activity concentration in the tissue biopsies (Ti) and in peripheral blood (B) as well as in normal breast tissue (Br) were calculated. In 8/12 patients the scintillation detector was used intraoperatively for radioactivity measurements of the biopsies in situ and ex vivo. The sstr-subtype profiles were determined by northern blot analysis and the relative expression of sstr2 by ribonuclease protection assay (RPA) and immunocytochemistry. Preoperative SRS visualised all primary breast cancer tumours. The scintigraphic image showed no correlation with the histopathological type of the tumour or with the abundance of oestrogen/progesterone receptors on the tumour. Two patients with a massive tumour infiltration of the lymph nodes had a distinct positive SRS of the ipsilateral axilla. In one patient with three nodal metastases the scintigraphic image of the axilla was weak but visible. Four other patients with a negative axillary scintigraphy had 1-2 lymph node metastases. The Ti/B ratios for the breast tumours varied between four and 33 and were not different from Ti/Br ratios. In lymph node metastases the Ti/B ratios were higher (10-41). Intraoperative detector measurements showed a significant difference between the breast tumour and normal tissue in 2/8 patients in situ. Similar measurements on excised tissues (ex vivo) showed a significant difference in 6/8 patients. Two patients with lymph node metastases exhibited a significantly increased uptake ex vivo by detector measurements, but in only one of them in situ. All tumour biopsies expressed the presence of sstrl, 3, 4 and 5, but not of sstr2 at northern analysis. On the other hand, sstr2 was detected in all tumours by RPA and immunocytochemistry. Preoperative SRS visualised primary breast cancer lesions in all 12 patients. SRS could also demonstrate extensive axillary tumour infiltration. Intraoperative use of the scintillation detector could not exclude axillary metastases in situ. The low Ti/B values of both primary tumours and metastases indicate limitations of the radiopharmaceutical used.

Localisation of somatostatin and somatostatin receptors in benign and malignant ovarian tumours

Somatostatin has been identified as having anti-proliferative, anti-angiogenic and pro-apoptotic actions in many tumour systems, and these effects are mediated through a family of five transmembrane G-protein coupled SRIF receptors. Ovarian cancer is the commonest gynaecological malignancy in the UK and maintenance therapy is urgently required. Native somatostatin expression and its receptors sst(1,2,3 and 5) were studied with immunohistochemistry in 63 malignant and 35 benign ovarian tumours of various histological types. Fifty-seven out of 63 (90%) of malignant and 26/35 (74%) benign tumours expressed somatostatin. Receptors sst(1,2,3 and 5) were expressed variably in epithelial, vascular and stromal compartments for both benign and malignant tumours. Somatostatin was found to correlate significantly with stromal sst(1) (P=0.008), epithelial sst(1) (P<0.001), stromal sst(2) (P=0.019), vascular sst(2) (P=0.026), epithelial sst(3) (P=0.026), stromal sst(5) (P=0.013) and vascular sst(5) (P=0.038). Increased expression of native somatostatin correlating with somatostatin receptors in malignant ovarian tumours raises the possibility that either synthetic somatostatin antagonists or receptor agonists may have therapeutic potential.

The clinical role of somatostatin analogues as antineoplastic agents: much ado about nothing?

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin (SST) analogues represent a novel approach for the treatment of certain cancers. The objective of this article is to summarise the current knowledge on SST analogues in the treatment of cancer patients.

METHODS

Computerised (Medline) and manual searches were performed to identify publications on clinical trials published in the English-speaking literature between 1966 and 2000. Information abstracted included patients' pre-treatment status, histology, SST receptor (SSTR) evaluation, type of SST analogue, application schedule and dose, duration of treatment, side-effects, response criteria applied (i.e. WHO response criteria, biochemical criteria or symptomatic investigations) and survival.

RESULTS

Our search disclosed 22 case reports, five phase 1 and 47 phase II trials, and eight randomised clinical trials using SST analogues (octreotide, lanreotide and vapreotide) as antineoplastic agents. With regard to the phase II trials, conflicting results have been demonstrated in almost all tumour entities investigated. The few randomised studies published so far have shown an impact on survival in patients with hepatocellular cancer, while the effect attributed to treatment in patients with gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas might well have been due to an exceptionally short survival in the control group. There appears to be evidence that SST analogues are able to enhance the therapeutic effects of hormonal intervention in patients with breast cancer, prostate cancer and probably pancreatic cancer. Interpretation of the findings, however, is complicated by the fact that patients were heavily pre-treated in some studies and response criteria have not been uniformly applied. In addition, most studies have not been designed to distinguish between receptor-mediated (direct) and indirect effects of SST analogues in tumour patients.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results obtained so far, there can be no doubt about the wide therapeutic index and the high efficacy of SST analogues in the symptomatic management of neuroendocrine tumours. Apart from these indications, the data do not justify recommendation of SST analogues as antineoplastic agents outside of clinical trials, as the optimal dose and schedule of application for antineoplastic activity has not been defined for currently used agents. Carefully designed clinical trials including investigation of SSTR status before treatment, evaluation of an indirect mechanism of SST analogues, and assessment of optimal combination of hormone therapy and chemotherapy with SST analogues are clearly needed in the near future.

N-terminal acylation of somatostatin analog with long chain fatty acids enhances its stability and anti-proliferative activity in human breast adenocarcinoma cells

The anti-proliferative activity of the somatostatin analog RC-160 is limited by its short serum half life. To circumvent this limitation, fatty acids of chain lengths ranging from 4 to 18 were individually conjugated to the N-terminal residue of RC-160. The lipophilized derivatives of RC-160 were synthesized, purified and characterized. The anti-proliferative activity of lipophilized-RC-160 on the human breast carcinoma cell line MCF-7, was evaluated in vitro. The long chain lipopeptides like pamitoyl-RC-160 exhibited significantly higher anti-proliferative activity on MCF-7 cells (p<0.001), relative to RC-160. The affinity of RC-160 towards somatostatin receptors remained unaltered by pamitoylation. However, the observed increase in bioactivity was manifested within an optimum range of chain length of the lipoppetide. Increasing the peptide hydrophobicity beyond this range reduced the bioactivity of lipophilized-RC-160. Accordingly, stearoyl-RC-160, manifested lower anti-neoplastic activity and receptor affinity relative to pamitoyl-RC-160 and RC-160 itself. The signaling pathways underlying the antineoplastic activity of these lipopeptides were found to be similar to RC-160. Pamitoyl-RC-160 displayed enhanced inhibition of protein tyrosine kinase activity and intracellular cAMP levels in MCF-7 cells, relative to butanoyl-RC-160 or RC-160 itself. Pamitoyl-RC-160 also displayed greater resistance towards trypsin and serum degradation than RC-160. Lipophilization of RC-160 with long chain fatty acids like pamitic acid improves its stability and anti-proliferative activity, thereby improving the scope of enhancing its therapeutic index. However, the optimization of peptide hydrophobicity seems to be a crucial factor governing the efficacy of bioactive lipopeptides.

Lysozyme expression by breast carcinomas, correlation with clinicopathologic parameters, and prognostic significance

BACKGROUND

Here we evaluate the expression and prognostic value of lysozyme, a milk protein that is also synthesized by a significant percentage of breast carcinomas, in women with breast cancer.

METHODS

Lysozyme expression was examined by immunohistochemical methods in a series of 177 breast cancer tissue sections. Staining was quantified by using the HSCORE system, which considers both the intensity and the percentage of cells staining at each intensity. The prognostic value of lysozyme was retrospectively evaluated by multivariate analysis that took into account conventional prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 126 of 177 carcinomas (69.4%) stained positive for this protein, but there were clear differences among them with regard to the intensity and percentage of stained cells. Lysozyme values were higher in well-differentiated and moderately differentiated tumors than in poorly differentiated tumors (P < .05). Similarly, lysozyme levels were higher in small and node-negative tumors than in large and node-positive tumors (P < .05). Moreover, results indicated that low lysozyme content predicted shorter relapse-free survival and overall survival (P < .005). Separate Cox multivariate analysis in subgroups of patients as defined by node status showed that lysozyme expression was an independent prognostic factor able to predict both relapse-free survival and overall survival in node-negative patients (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumoral expression of lysozyme is associated with lesions of favorable evolution in breast cancer. This milk protein may be a new prognostic factor in patients with breast cancer.

Treatment of metastatic breast cancer with somatostatin analogues--a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analogues appear to have antiproliferative effects in breast cancer by inhibiting various hormones. Several small phase 1 and 2 clinical trails have evaluated the efficacy of somatostatin analogues, but the results are varied. The purpose of this study was to use the technique of meta-analysis to determine the effect of somatostatin analogues on tumor response, toxicity, and serum hormone levels in women with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

All published and unpublished trials were reviewed. Meta-analysis was preformed by best linear unbiased estimate regression with observations weighted inversely to their variance. Significance was considered at P < .05.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (N = 210) were included. Positive tumor response was reported in 87 patients (41.4%). Mean duration of response was 3.9 months. Response was best when somatostatin analogues were given as first-line therapy (69.5% versus 28.5%, P < .006) and in patients with < or =2 metastases (45.0% versus 5.6%, P = .3). Mild side effects occurred in 47 of 185 patients (25.4%). Therapy was associated with a decrease in serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) and an increase in growth hormone.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with metastatic breast cancer, treatment with somatostatin analogues was associated with a tumor response of over 40% with few side effects. Best results were achieved when somatostatin analogues were given as first-line therapy.

Role of dopamine in malignant tumor growth

The regulatory role of dopamine, a monoamine neurotransmitter and/or a neurohormone in controlling the secretion of several anterior pituitary hormones, cardiovascular, and renal functions, has already been extensively used by clinicians for therapeutic purposes. In addition to these important functions of dopamine, some recent reports also indicate its novel role in regulating malignant cell proliferation and controlling immune functions in tumor-bearing animals. Therefore, in this article, we discuss all the relevant information correlating dopamine and malignant tumor growth in order to understand the host-tumor relationship at the level of a neurotransmitter and/or a neurohormone.

Stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in rat somatotrophs by growth hormone-releasing hormone

Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) is an important regulator of somatotroph development and function. However, GHRH signaling is still not completely understood. Signaling through the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway has been observed in a wide variety of cell types but has not been explored as a mediator of GHRH action. In this study, we examined the phosphorylation of MAPK pathway intermediates in response to GHRH. After treatment of the GH4 rat somatotroph cell line with rGHRH (10(7) M) for 2.5 min, there was robust phosphorylation of MAPK not seen in vehicle-treated cells. Treatment of HeLa cells with GHRH resulted in no activation of MAPK, but activation was conferred by transfection with the GHRH receptor cDNA. MAPK activation by GHRH was dose dependent from 1 to 100 nM, was evident at 2.5 min, peaked at 5 min, and returned to baseline by 20 min. Pretreatment of GH4 cells with somatostatin analog BIM23014 or the MEK1 inhibitor PD98095 prevented the activation of MAPK. Finally, treatment with GHRH increased GH4 proliferation in culture, and this response was prevented by pretreatment with BIM23014 and PD98095. These results indicate that GHRH activates the MAPK pathway. Furthermore, activation of MAPK may mediate, at least in part, the effects of GHRH on somatotroph cell line proliferation. The findings support the concept that multiple pathways mediate the effects of GHRH.

Phase II study of RC-160 (vapreotide), an octapeptide analogue of somatostatin, in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

RC-160 (octastatin/vapreotide) is a potent octapeptide analogue of somatostatin with growth inhibitory activity in experimental tumours in vitro and in vivo, including breast cancer. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose RC-160, 3 mg day(-1) on week 1 increased to 4.5 mg day(-1) for weeks 2-4 and subsequently 6 mg day(-1) until the end of treatment, administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion in the management of 14 women with previously treated metastatic breast cancer. The age range was 37-80 years (median 58.5 years) and performance status 0-2. The treatment was well tolerated with no dose reductions being required. No grade 3 or 4 toxicities were seen. Abscess formation developed at the infusion site in eight patients and erythema and discomfort was seen in a further three patients. A significant reduction in IGF-I levels occurred by day 7 and was maintained throughout the treatment. The lowest dose of RC-160 produced the maximal IGF-I response. Although there was no reduction in prolactin levels in patients whose baseline levels were normal, elevated prolactin levels found in three patients fell to within the normal range 7 days after commencing RC-160 treatment. A small but significant rise in fasting blood glucose levels was also recorded, the highest level on treatment being 7.6 mmol l(-1). No objective tumour responses were observed, all patients showing disease progression within 3 months of commencing treatment. These findings demonstrate that high-dose RC-160, administered as a continuous subcutaneous infusion, can reduce serum levels of the breast growth factors IGF-I and prolactin but is ineffective in the management of metastatic breast cancer. Encouraging preclinical anti-tumour activity and the favourable toxicity profile in patients suggest the merit of future studies combining RC-160 with anti-oestrogen, cytotoxic and anti-angiogenic agents.

Bcl-2 and drugs used in the treatment of cancer: new strategies of biotherapy which should not be underestimated

The theory that an imbalance in the control of the cell cycle contributes to the appearance and progression of neoplastic disease is gaining more ground all the time. This new line of research into tumor disease is a result of the progress made in the comprehension of cell death (apoptosis) and the discovery of alterations in the apoptotic pathway in patients with cancer, which have also been correlated to disease mechanisms. Alterations in the cycle of events that brings about apoptosis can result in tumor cells resistant to chemotherapy. In fact one of the inherent risks of chemotherapy is the generation of new, more aggressive, clonal variants and destruction of healthy cells with deleterious effects on the organism. This review examines the results of studies concerning the identification of the alterations in apoptotic mechanisms in carcinogenesis and the mechanisms governing their regulation. The aim was to evaluate if such data could be of use in identifying drugs able to improve cancer treatment.