Paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer: results of a phase II trial

Current Therapy for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a highly lethal malignancy in the metastatic state. Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens have been the backbone treatment for patients with advanced UC in the first-line setting. However, a large subset of patients are suboptimal candidates for these combinations owing to poor renal function and/or other comorbidities. Patients who are unable to tolerate or who progress after frontline platinum chemotherapy face a poor outcome. Recent insights into UC biology and immunology are being translated into new therapies for metastatic UC (mUC) including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), erdafitinib, a FGFR inhibitor, and antibody drug conjugates (ADC) such enfortumab vedotin.

Nonplatinum therapy in advanced bladder cancer

Carcinoma of the bladder is the second most prevalent genitourinary malignancy and the fifth most common solid malignancy in the USA. Combination chemotherapy is used in most patients with advanced disease. Traditionally, on the basis of favorable response rates and survival data, cisplatin-based regimens have been the preferred chemotherapy for patients with metastatic bladder cancer. However, the toxicity profile of cisplatin precludes its use in a significant subset of patients with advanced bladder cancer. Conversely, noncisplatin-containing regimens have been shown to have a more favorable toxicity profile and to have activity in advanced bladder cancer. Here, various nonplatinum chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease are reviewed.

Systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium and impaired renal function

Cisplatin is the backbone of chemotherapeutic regimens used in the treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. However, about 50% of patients cannot be administered cisplatin because of impaired renal functions. A review of the different approaches that have been developed in this patient population was performed through a Medline search from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2010. Twenty-six studies including 25 phase II and one randomized phase II/III studies were analyzed. All regimens, except one, were based on gemcitabine and/or carboplatin and/or paclitaxel. Only five (20%) out of 25 phase II studies actually include homogeneous patients with an impaired renal function defined by a creatinine clearance below 60 ml/min. One hundred and eight patients with a median creatinine clearance ranging from 28 to 48 ml/min received four different chemotherapy regimens including one to four drugs. The results showed the response rates to vary from 24 to 56% and survival to range from 7 to 15 months. No standard chemotherapy can be recommended from literature data. Future randomized studies will have to solve the following questions: what is the optimal definition of cisplatin eligibility? Which platinum salt should be used? Is a platinum salt necessary? How many drugs should be delivered?

Current chemotherapeutic strategies against bladder cancer

Urothelial cancer is a chemotherapy-sensitive malignancy, with the regimen of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) until recently considered to be the first choice for chemotherapy. Poor survival and substantial toxicity associated with M-VAC have led to investigations into alternative chemotherapy strategies, and the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) may be promising. In addition, combination chemotherapy of taxanes along with gemcitabine and/or platinum-based agents is also considered to provide clinical benefits as second-line chemotherapy following M-VAC or GC therapy. In the near future, results of trials using molecular target therapies may bring improved outcomes for patients with bladder cancer.

Phase II Trial of Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, and Bevacizumab As First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Hoosier Oncology Group GU 04-75

Purpose

Novel approaches are needed for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (UC). This trial assessed the efficacy and toxicity of bevacizumab in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine (CGB) as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic UC.

Patients and Methods

Chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic or unresectable UC received cisplatin 70 mg/m2on day 1, gemcitabine 1,000 to 1,250 mg/m2on days 1 and 8, and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on day 1, every 21 days.

Results

Forty-three patients with performance status of 0 (n = 26) or 1 (n = 17) and median age of 66 years were evaluable for toxicity and response. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity included neutropenia (35%), thrombocytopenia (12%), anemia (12%), and neutropenic fever (2%). Grade 3 to 5 nonhematologic toxicity included deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (21%), hemorrhage (7%), cardiac (7%), hypertension (5%), and proteinuria (2%). Three treatment-related deaths (CNS hemorrhage, sudden cardiac death, and aortic dissection) were observed. Best response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was complete response in eight patients (19%) and partial response in 23 patients (53%), for an overall response rate of 72%. Stable disease lasting ≥ 12 weeks occurred in four patients (9%), and progressive disease occurred in six patients (14%). With a median follow-up of 27.2 months (range, 3.5 to 40.9 months), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.8 to 10.3 months) with a median overall survival (OS) time of 19.1 months (95% CI, 12.4 to 22.7 months). The study-defined goal of 50% improvement in PFS was not met.

Conclusion

CGB demonstrates promising OS and antiangiogenic treatment-related toxicities in the phase II setting of metastatic UC. The full risk/benefit profile of CGB in patients with metastatic UC will be determined by an ongoing phase III intergroup trial.

[Systemic oncological treatment of bladder cancer]

M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin) and Cisplatin/Gemzar are potent therapies in the treatment of advanced bladder cancer. C/G provides similar efficacy in terms of overall survival compared with M-VAC, but does so with a superior safety profile. Therefore C/G is widely accepted as standard of care in locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer. Despite potentially curative surgery almost half of the patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer will have recurrence of disease. Based on a recent meta-analysis with data from 3005 patients, and 2 randomised studies, neoadjuvant cisplatin-containing therapy has shown to improve overall survival. Thus, the use of neoadjuvant systemic treatment should be considered state-of-the-art. The question whether adjuvant treatment will improve the outcome is still not sufficiently answered.

Systemic chemotherapy in locally advanced and/or metastatic bladder cancer

Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder is a common malignancy. Advanced urothelial cancer is a chemosenstive neoplasm. Whereas the MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) regimen was long-considered the standard of care for patients with advanced disease, the evaluation of newer agents with retained activity and improved tolerability has been the focus of much investigation over the past decade. Combinations such as cisplatin-gemcitabine (GC) and intensified, G-CSF supported MVAC have shown more favourable toxicity profile and equal or even improved efficacy. Specific groups of patients (elderly, patients with renal dysfunction or poor performance status or co-morbidities) who cannot tolerate cisplatin-based therapy, should receive carboplatin, gemcitabine or taxane-based treatment. Continuing improvements in our understanding of the molecular phenotype of individual patient tumors may lead to the appropriate therapies that target molecular aberrations unique to this malignancy. This review will summarize recent developments in the management of locally advanced (T4b, N 2-3) and/or metastatic (M1) bladder cancer.

Systemic chemotherapy in inoperable or metastatic bladder cancer

Urothelial cancer is a common malignancy. The management of patients with recurrent disease after cystectomy or initially metastatic or unresectable disease represents a therapeutic challenge. Systemic chemotherapy prolongs survival but long-term survival remains infrequent. During recent years there has been improvement due to the use of novel chemotherapeutic agents, mainly gemcitabine and the taxanes. The long-considered-standard MVAC has been challenged by combinations showing more favourable toxicity profiles and equal (gemcitabine-cisplatin) or even improved (dose-dense, G-CSF-supported MVAC) efficacy. Specific interest has also been generated in specific groups of patients (elderly patients, patients with renal function impairment or comorbidities), who are not fit for the standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy but can derive significant benefit from carboplatin- or taxane-based treatment. Retrospective analyses have enabled the identification of groups of patients with different prognoses, who possibly require different therapeutic approaches. Modern chemotherapy offers a chance of long-term survival in patients without visceral metastases, possibly in combination with definitive local treatment. Finally, the progress of targeted therapies in other neoplasms seems to be reflected in advanced bladder cancer by recent studies indicating that biological agents can be combined with modern chemotherapy. The true role of such therapies is currently being evaluated.

The role of taxanes in the management of bladder cancer

Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder is a chemo-sensitive neoplasm. Whereas the MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) regimen was long considered the standard of care for patients with advanced disease, the evaluation of newer agents with retained activity and improved tolerability has been the focus of much investigation over the past decade. Among the most important of these newer agents are taxanes. Whereas taxane-containing regimens have not yet been shown to improve the survival of patients with transitional cell carcinoma in randomized trials, ongoing phase III trials will further define the role of these agents in both the perioperative and advanced disease settings.

Phase II Trial of Weekly Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Transitional Cell Cancer

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of a first-line combination chemotherapy using weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with metastatic transitional cell cancer (TCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients with advanced measurable TCC of the urothelium were entered onto this trial. Patients were treated once weekly with a combination therapy of paclitaxel (100mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC 2, according to the Calvert formula). Therapy courses were administered for six consecutive weeks. After two cycles, a re-staging was carried out to evaluate response.

RESULTS

Objective response rate was 57.6% with 6 complete (18.2%) and 13 partial remissions (39.4%). Seven patients had stable disease (21.2%) and 7 patients had progressed at the first evaluation of response (21.2%). Median progression-free interval and median survival was 6.5 (1-35) and 12 (2.5-58) months, respectively. Toxicity was moderate and manageable with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia in 8 patients (24%), but no case of neutropenic fever. Other hematological grade 3 toxicities occurred in 9 patients (27%) and grade 3 peripheral neuropathy in 2 patients (6%). There was no treatment-related death. Dose reduction or short delay of treatment was necessary in 3 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy using weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin was active in patients with advanced TCC and adverse prognostic features. The weekly dosing used in this trial warrants further investigation as an alternative first-line approach in patients with poor renal reserve and/or performance status or as a second-line management of advanced TCC.

Gemcitabine and docetaxel as first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma: a phase II study

The purpose of the study was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in untreated advanced urothelial carcinoma. Patients with previously untreated, locally advanced/recurrent or metastatic urothelial carcinoma stage-IV disease were eligible. Patients with Performance status: PS ECOG >3 or age >75 years or creatinine clearance <50 ml min(-1) were excluded. Study treatment consisted of docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) (day 8) and gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) (days 1+8), every 21 days for a total of six to nine cycles. A total of 31 patients with urothelial bladder cancer, 25 men and six women, aged 42-74 (median 64) years were enrolled. The majority of patients had a good PS (51.6%; PS 0). In all, 15 (48.3%) patients had locally advanced or recurrent disease only and 16 (54.8%) presented with distant metastatic spread, with multiple site involvement in 22.5%. Toxicity was primarily haematologic, and the most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were anaemia 11 (6.7%) thrombocytopenia eight (4.9%), and neutropenia 45 (27.6%), with 10 (6.1%) episodes of febrile neutropenia. No toxic deaths occurred. A number of patients had some cardiovascular morbidity (38.7%). Nonhaematological toxicities except alopecia (29 patients) were mild. Overall response rate was 51.6%, including four complete responses (12.9%) and 12 partial responses (38.7%), while a further five patients had disease stabilisation (s.d. 16.1%). The median time to progression was 8 months (95% CI 5.1-9.2 months) and the median overall survival was 15 months (95% CI 11.2-18.5 months), with 1-year survival rate of 60%. In conclusion, this schedule of gemcitabine and docetaxel is very active and well tolerated as a first-line treatment for advanced/relapsing or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Although its relative efficacy and tolerance as compared to classic MVAC should be assessed in a phase III setting, the favourable toxicity profile of this regimen may offer an interesting alternative, particularly in patients with compromised renal function or cardiovascular disease.

The outcome of elderly patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma after platinum-based combination chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The majority of patients with advanced urothelial cancer are elderly, but data regarding this specific age group are limited. We compared the tolerability and efficacy of first-line platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin)-based chemotherapy in elderly patients (> or =70 years) with those in younger patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 381 patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma received CIMV (cisplatin, ifosphamide, methotrexate, vinblastine) (n=32), MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin) (n=105), DC (docetaxel, cisplatin) (n=174), CaG (carboplatin, gemcitabine) (n=64) or other regimes (n=6) and were included in this analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients were > or =70 years. Elderly patients experienced more frequent neutropenia grade 3/4 (55% versus 37%, P=0.087) and renal toxicity (28% versus 10%, P=0.033) among patients treated with CIMV/MVAC, and neutropenic infections (4% versus 0%, P=0.019) among patients treated with DC. Median survival did not differ significantly between elderly and younger patients (9.3 versus 10.5 months, P=0.16). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) and haemoglobin were independently associated with prognosis. Patients with PS <2 and haemoglobin > or =10 g/dl had a median survival of 14 months as opposed to 5 months for patients with PS > or =2 or haemoglobin <10 g/dl (P <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients with advanced urothelial cancer tolerate platinum-based chemotherapy well and derive the same benefit as their younger counterparts.

Gemcitabine and carboplatin combination as first-line treatment in elderly patients and those unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy with advanced bladder carcinoma: Phase II study of the Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate, in a multicenter Phase II study, the safety and efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin, as first-line treatment in elderly and unfit patients with advanced bladder carcinoma. The toxicity of platinum-based chemotherapy combinations represents a common problem for elderly or unfit patients with advanced bladder carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated inoperable or metastatic bladder carcinoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than 2, age older than 75 years, or creatinine clearance of less than 50 mL/min were treated with carboplatin area under the curve 4 on day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, every 21 days for a total of six cycles.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients (48 men and 8 women, median age 75 years) were enrolled. Of these patients, 46% had a performance status of 2 to 3, 68% had a creatinine clearance of less than 50 mL/min, and 59% had distant metastases. The overall response rate was 36% (95% confidence interval 23.4% to 49.6%), and an additional 14 patients had disease stabilization (25%, 95% confidence interval 14.4% to 38.4%). The median time to progression was 4.8 months, the median overall survival was 7.2 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 26%. Grade 3 or 4 toxicity included anemia (18%); thrombocytopenia (16%); neutropenia (27%), with two episodes of febrile neutropenia requiring hospitalization; diarrhea (2%); and fatigue (5.5%). Two toxic deaths occurred during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin has some activity as first-line treatment of advanced bladder carcinoma in the elderly and those unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy, with manageable toxicity, and represents a reasonable choice for the treatment of such patients.

Systemic chemotherapy for patients with bladder cancer – current controversies and future directions

Many localised, superficial bladder cancers can be effectively controlled. However, disease which has spread to nodes outside the pelvis or to distant organs is generally incurable and systemic therapies, rather than surgery, are appropriate. Combination chemotherapy based around established cytotoxic drugs such as cisplatin has proven benefit in palliating symptoms and prolonging survival in responsive patients with advanced disease. Combination chemotherapies which include newer cytotoxic drugs such as gemcitabine provide the potential for equivalent efficacy with less toxicity than established regimens. Between the extremes of superficial and advanced disease, muscle-invasive bladder cancers have traditionally been treated, with curative intent, by radical surgery or radiotherapy. However, newly published data suggest, for the first time, genuine survival benefits from peri-operative chemotherapy. This article reviews the evidence for cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced disease, assesses the potential benefits of newer cytotoxic drugs, discusses the latest evidence pertaining to peri-operative chemotherapy in muscle-invasive disease, and looks forward to potential new biological agents in the systemic therapy of bladder cancer.

Phase III trial of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced carcinoma of the urothelium

BACKGROUND

The regimens of carboplatin plus paclitaxel (CP) and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) were compared in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma were randomized to receive either CP (paclitaxel at a dose of 225 mg/m(2) and carboplatin [targeted area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 6] given every 21 days) or the standard M-VAC dosage.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were randomized to the respective treatment regimens (41 to CP and 44 to M-VAC). Response rates and overall survival were similar for both treatment arms. Patients treated with CP had an overall response rate of 28.2% (95% binomial confidence interval, 15.0-44.9%) compared with an overall response rate of 35.9% for the M-VAC arm (95% binomial confidence interval, 21.2-52.8%) (P = 0.63, Fisher exact test). The median progression-free survival among patients who were treated with M-VAC was 8.7 months and was 5.2 months for patients receiving CP (P = 0.24, log-rank test). At a median follow-up of 32.5 months, the median survival for patients treated with M-VAC was 15.4 months versus 13.8 months for patients treated with CP (P = 0.65, log-rank test). Patients treated with M-VAC were found to have more severe worst-degree toxicities compared with patients treated with CP (P = 0.0001). There were no significant differences with regard to quality of life as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bladder (FACT-BL) instrument (P = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Interpretation of the results of this study must be made with caution because the study failed to reach its accrual goal. Patients treated with CP had a median survival of 13.8 months compared with 15.4 months for patients treated with M-VAC. Patients treated with CP appeared in general to better tolerate their treatment; however, there were no significant differences noted with regard to measured quality of life parameters.

New drugs and new approaches in metastatic bladder cancer

The median survival of patients with metastatic cancer of the urothelium who receive best supportive care only in 4-6 months. With the introduction of combination chemotherapy regimens including cisplatin and methotrexate for the management of metastatic urothelial cancer, median overall survival has doubled. Nevertheless, death due to cancer ultimately occurs in more than 80% of these patients, thus more effective therapy is required. The new available treatment modalities range from new combinations of conventional chemotherapeutic agents to combinations incorporating novel drugs like gemcitabine and the taxanes. These new combinations incorporate the new active agents in two, three or multiple drug combinations, administered either in one regimen or sequentially in various combinations and schedules intended to improve the outcome of bladder cancer patients. Ongoing phase III studies will help to define the role of these new combinations in the treatment of advanced bladder cancer. The improved understanding of the molecular biology of urothelial malignancies is helping to define the role of new prognostic indices that can direct the most appropriate choice of treatment for advanced disease. In addition, advances in the molecular biology of urothelial malignancies may allow identification of specific genetic lesions and biochemical pathways upon which future therapeutic approaches can be focused. The integration of newer biologic agents, probably to supplement rather than to supplant chemotherapeutic drugs, should be a primary direction of research with the objective to interfere with multiple aspects of bladder cancer progression.

Current and future perspectives in advanced bladder cancer: is there a new standard?

The methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC) regimen has been the standard treatment in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer for the past 15 years. The minimal or moderate survival benefit-depending on prognostic features-and the severe toxicity associated with the MVAC regimen have made the search for new drugs and drug combinations of utmost importance to increase efficacy and/or decrease toxicity. In this respect, the taxanes and gemcitabine are promising new drugs. Paclitaxel and docetaxel as single agents have yielded overall response rates of 7% to 56%, depending on whether the patients have received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin has been explored in three studies with a total of 104 evaluable patients, a pooled overall response (OR) rate of 61%, and a complete response (CR) rate of 20%. There are two studies of docetaxel and cisplatin with a total of 91 evaluable patients, an OR rate of 54%, and a CR rate of 16%. The OR rate for paclitaxel and carboplatin in six studies was 43%, with a CR rate of 13%; however, the reported median survival was only 8.5 to 9.5 months. The OR rate for single-agent gemcitabine based on five studies was 26%, with a CR rate of 9%, which was apparently independent of whether the patients had received prior chemotherapy. The OR rate for gemcitabine and cisplatin in four phase II studies ranged from 41% to 57%, with a CR rate of 15% to 22% and a median survival of 12.5 to 14.3 months. Based on the encouraging results for the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC), a randomized phase III trial comparing GC and MVAC was begun in late 1996. This study of 405 randomized patients showed that the two regimens were associated with similar response rates, time to progression, and overall survival, whereas GC was associated with less toxicity than MVAC. On the basis of this superior risk-benefit ratio, the GC regimen should be favored as a new standard treatment in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer. Other promising combinations include gemcitabine and paclitaxel, with or without cisplatin, and the combination of ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin. The triple combination of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and cisplatin has yielded an OR rate of 78%, a CR rate of 28%, and a median survival of 24 months. An international phase III trial comparing this triple combination with GC in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer has now been initiated.

Novel gemcitabine-containing triplets in the management of urothelial cancer

Chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of treatment of advanced urothelial cancer. For a decade, the combination regimen of methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin has been considered the standard for these patients. The need for improved efficacy and reduced toxicity of a predominantly palliative therapy has propelled efforts for new drug development. Of the newly identified agents with documented activity, both gemcitabine and paclitaxel have been evaluated with a platinum and have been incorporated into multiagent chemotherapy combinations. Phase II data from two gemcitabine-based triplets are currently available. Combination gemcitabine/paclitaxel/cisplatin and gemcitabine/paclitaxel/carboplatin have high levels of activity with overall and complete response rates of 76% and 26%, respectively, for the former and 68% and 32%, respectively, for the latter combination. The role of gemcitabine-based multiagent combinations compared with standard therapy awaits evaluation in prospectively randomized trials.

Phase II multicentre study of docetaxel plus cisplatin in patients with advanced urothelial cancer

A multicentre phase II trial was undertaken to evaluate the activity and toxicity of docetaxel plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with urothelial cancer. Thirty-eight patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder, renal pelvis or ureter received the combination of docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 75 mg m(-2) on day 1 and repeated every 21 days, to a maximum of six cycles. The median delivered dose-intensity was 98% (range 79-102%) of the planned dose for both drugs. There were seven complete responses and 15 partial responses, for and overall response rate of 58% (95% CI, 41-74%). Responses were even seen in three patients with hepatic metastases. The median time to progression was 6.9 months, and the median overall survival was 10.4 months. Two patients who achieved CR status remain free of disease at 4 and 3 years respectively. Grade 3-4 granulocytopenia occurred in 27 patients, resulting in five episodes of febrile neutropenia. There was one toxic death in a patient with grade 4 granulocytopenia who developed acute abdomen. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was rare (one patient). Other grade 3-4 toxicities observed were anaemia (three patients), vomiting (five patients), diarrhoea (four patients), peripheral neuropathy (two patients) and non-neutropenic infections (seven patients). Docetaxel plus cisplatin is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer, and warrants further investigation.

Combination paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine is an active treatment for advanced urothelial cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy and toxicity of the drug combination of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients eligible included those with advanced urothelial malignancy of any histology, no previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease, Southwest Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less, serum creatinine levels of 2 mg/dL or less, and adequate bone marrow and hepatic function. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2, carboplatin (target area under the curve = 5) on day 1, and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, repeated every 21 days.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients (44 men and five women) were enrolled; the patients' median age was 63 years, and their median creatinine clearance was 78 mL/min (range, 26 to 165 mL/min). Forty-three patients had transitional cell carcinoma, and six had squamous cell carcinoma or mixed histology. Ten patients had metastases to lymph nodes only, six had locally advanced disease, four had locally recurrent disease, 24 patients had visceral metastases, and five had soft tissue metastases. Twenty-one patients had disease in one site, 16 in two sites, and 12 in three sites. A total of 272 cycles were administered (median, six cycles; range, 1 to 15 cycles). Major toxicities were grade 3 and 4 neutropenia in 17 and 19 patients, respectively; grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in 15 and six patients, respectively; grade 3 and 4 anemia in 10 and two patients, respectively; grade 3 neuropathy in four patients; and diarrhea in two patients. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 1.4%; no patients died of drug toxicity. Forty-seven of the 49 patients were assessable for response. Fifteen (32%) patients experienced a complete response, and 17 (36%) patients experienced a partial response (32 of 47 patients, 68%; 95% confidence interval, 56.27 to 82.86). Responses were seen in all sites, including 15 (68%) of 22 patients with visceral metastases. The median survival was 14.7 months, with a 1-year survival of 59%.

CONCLUSION

Combination paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine is active; an encouraging number of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with this regimen experienced complete remission.

Gemcitabine/paclitaxel-based three-drug regimens in advanced urothelial cancer

Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium is a highly chemosensitive tumour. Combination chemotherapy can provide both palliation and a modest survival advantage in patients with advanced disease. At present, the combination of cisplatin, methotrexate, doxorubicin and vinblastine (M-VAC) is the most widely used for advanced TCC with an overall response rate of 40-72% in phase II, and 35-45% in phase III studies, and a median survival of approximately 12 months. These modest results and the unsuccessful attempts to increase efficacy with dose intensive M-VAC schedules have prompted the identification of new active agents in TCC, such as the taxanes and gemcitabine. The overall response rates for two-drug regimens of cisplatin-paclitaxel, carboplatin-paclitaxel and cisplatin-gemcitabine range from 63 to 72%, 14 to 65% and 42 to 66%, respectively. The overall response rates for platinum-paclitaxel-gemcitabine three-drug regimens range from 58 to 80%. The potential clinical benefit of these new three-drug combinations in the treatment of TCC needs to be tested in future phase III studies.

Southwest Oncology Group Study of paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced transitional-cell carcinoma: the importance of survival as a clinical trial end point

PURPOSE

The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium has promising activity and acceptable toxicity. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen in a cooperative group setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with advanced TCC were treated every 21 days with paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2), administered as a 3-hour infusion, followed by carboplatin dosed to an area under the curve of 5. Prior systemic adjuvant or neoadjuvant platinum-based therapy was not permitted unless completed at least 1 year before enrollment. Patients were evaluated for response every three cycles, and follow-up was conducted to determine survival.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were enrolled and were assessable. Four (14%) had received prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. Node-only disease was present in 24%, and 76% of patients had extranodal disease. The median number of cycles received was five. Grade 4 toxicity consisted primarily of neutropenia (38% of patients). Neurologic toxicity was noted in 16 patients (grade 1 in four patients, grade 2 in five patients, grade 3 in six patients, and grade 4 in one patient). Six partial responses and no complete responses were noted, for a response proportion of 20.7% (95% confidence interval, 8% to 40%). Median progression-free survival time was 4 months, and overall survival time was 9 months.

CONCLUSION

The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of advanced TCC is reasonably well tolerated. However, a response proportion considerably lower than that previously reported was noted. In addition, the median survival time of 9 months was less than the survival time previously reported for patients treated with the combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. Although our results may reflect enrollment of patients with poor prognostic features, they also call into question the utility of this regimen.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin in bladder cancer: recent developments

Paclitaxel demonstrates significant single-agent activity in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Paclitaxel/carboplatin is an active and tolerable outpatient chemotherapy treatment regimen for these patients. This regimen has been studied in several phase II trials with response rates ranging from 14 to 65%. Paclitaxel/carboplatin may be considered in patients with advanced urothelial cancer and renal insufficiency, and a recent Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) phase II trial investigates this regimen specifically in this patient population. Ongoing ECOG trials are comparing paclitaxel/carboplatin with M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin) in both the advanced disease and adjuvant settings.

A phase II trial of methotrexate, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in the treatment of invasive and metastatic urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The current treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma generates high response rates but is associated with poor overall survival. The current study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a new combination of active drugs in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with muscle invasive or metastatic urothelial carcinoma were enrolled. Fifteen patients (63%) had metastatic disease whereas 9 patients had T2-T4 disease. Three patients were unevaluable for response because of significant toxicity. Patients were treated every 28 days with methotrexate, 60 mg/m(2), intravenously (i.v.) on Day 1; cisplatin, 25 mg/m(2)/day, by continuous i.v. infusion on Days 2-6; 5-flurouracil (5-FU) 800 mg/m(2)/day by continuous i.v. infusion on Days 3-6; and leucovorin, 500 mg/m(2)/day, by continuous i.v. infusion on Days 2-6. Dosage in subsequent cycles was adjusted according to toxicity.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 81 months (range, 53-97+ months). The overall response rate (complete response + partial response) for all 24 patients was 63% (95% confidence interval, 41-81%). The median survival was 65 months in the patients with muscle invasive disease and 17 months in the patients with metastatic disease. The duration of response in patients with metastatic disease was 6 months (range, 4-19 months). Toxicity was significant, with 82% of patients experiencing Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and 63% experiencing Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. However, only three patients developed febrile neutropenia and gastrointestinal and neurologic toxicity was moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of methotrexate, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin represents an active regimen in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma with a moderate toxicity profile. As new drugs are found to treat urothelial carcinoma, further studies will be needed to evaluate the role of traditional agents such as 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate in new combination chemotherapeutic regimens.

A Phase II study of paclitaxel and ifosfamide for patients with advanced refractory carcinoma of the urothelium

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium has limitations, and new therapies need to be evaluated.

METHODS

Ifosfamide 1.0 gm/m2 on Days 1-4 and paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion on Day 4 were administered to 26 patients with locally unresectable or metastatic TCC. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles; dose escalation was dependent on whether Grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurred.

RESULTS

There were 24 males and 2 females, with a median age of 66 years and a median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0. The median number of cycles administered was 3. Twelve patients had Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities, including 1 patient who died of a gastrointestinal hemorrhage while pancytopenic. There were no episodes of neutropenic fever. Two patients each had a complete response (CR) that lasted 5 and 28 months, respectively (response rate: 15%; 95% CI: 2-45%), among the 13 patients who had received prior chemotherapy. Of the 13 patients without prior chemotherapy, there were 3 with complete responses and 1 with a partial response ranging from 8 to 25+ months (RR: 30.7%; 95% CI: 9-61%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of ifosfamide and paclitaxel is well tolerated and can produce objective responses in patients who are chemonaïve or have had prior therapy. For previously untreated patients, the addition of ifosfamide does not appear to result in a better response rate than single agent paclitaxel; and for previously treated patients, the addition of paclitaxel does not appear to result in a better response rate than single agent ifosfamide.