1
|
Park JH, Cho KH, Choi J, Chun S, Lee JK, Cho H, Kim B. Risk factors for colorectal cancer in a fecal immunochemical test-positive group: The National Health Insurance Service-National Health Screening Cohort. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 39:74-80. [PMID: 37855299 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Colorectal cancer (CRC) was the fourth most common cancer in Republic of Korea in 2019. It has a gradually increasing mortality rate, indicating the importance of screening for CRC. Among the various CRC screening test, fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a simple yet most commonly used. Neverthelss, there have been only few long-term studies on subjects with FIT-positive. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the risk factors for CRC in FIT-positive patients using the National Health Insurance Service Bigdata database. METHODS Among 1 737 633 individuals with a FIT screening result for CRC in 2009, 101 143 (5.82%) were confirmed to be FIT positive. The CRC incidence over 10 years (up to 2018) of these participants was investigated using the National Cancer Registry. RESULTS Out of the 101 143 FIT-positive participants, 4395 (4.35%) were diagnosed with CRC. The FIT-positive patients who underwent a second round of screening showed a 5-year cumulative CRC incidence of approximately 1.25%, whereas those who did not showed an incidence of approximately 3.75%. Among the FIT-positive patients, the CRC incidence in the non-compliance group for the second round of screening was 2.8 times higher than that in the compliance group. CONCLUSIONS In FIT-positive participants, non-compliance with the second round of screening was identified as a major risk factor for CRC development. It is necessary to establish appropriate strategies for managing risk factors for CRC in FIT-positive patients to increase the rate of compliance with the second round of CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joo Hyun Park
- Department of Family Medicine, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Kyung Hee Cho
- Department of Family Medicine, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Junho Choi
- Department of Family Medicine, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sungyoun Chun
- Research Institute, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jae Kwang Lee
- Research Institute, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Hyunsoon Cho
- Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Bun Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koïvogui A, Abihsera G, Le Trong T, Ait-Hadad H, Bernoux A, Delattre H, Vincelet C, Caroll R, Nicolet J. [Évaluation de la gravité du cancer colorectal dépisté dans le contexte de la crise sanitaire liée au COVID19 en région Ile-de-France]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2023; 71:102124. [PMID: 37451076 PMCID: PMC10291290 DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2023.102124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND After the announcement in March 2020 of the COVID-19 pandemic, colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs were suspended in several countries. Compared to the lesions detected during previous campaigns, this study aims to assess the severity of CRC detected during the 2020 screening campaign in Île-de-France, the French region most affected by the 1st wave of the pandemic. METHODS The descriptive and etiological study included all faecal immunochemical test (FIT) results carried out between January 2017 and December 2020 on people aged 50-74, living in Île-de-France. First, the proportion of colonoscopies performed within one month (One-month-colo) following FIT; the yield of colonoscopy (proportion of colonoscopies with a neoplasm lesion among those performed) and CRC severity (TNM Classification, Level-0: T0/N0/M0, Level-1: T1/T2/N0/M0, Level-2: T3/T4/N0/M0; Level-3: T3/T4/N1/M0; Level-4: M1) were described in 2020 compared to previous campaigns (2017, 2018, and 2019). Subsequently, the link between the level of CRC severity and the predictive factors, including campaign year and time to colonoscopy, was analysed using polytomous multivariate regression. RESULTS The one-month-colo (2017: 9.1% of 11,529 colonoscopies; 2018: 8.5% of 13,346; 2019: 5.7% of 7,881; 2020: 6.7% of 11,040; p < 0.001), the yield (65.2%, 64.1%, 62.4%, 60.8% respectively, p < 0.001) were significantly different between campaigns. The proportion of CRC level-4 (4.8% in 2017 (653 CRC); 7.6% in 2018 (674 CRC); 4.6% in 2019 (330 CRC) and 4.7% in 2020 (404 CRC); p < 0.29) was not significantly different between campaigns. The probability of having CRC with a high severity level was inversely related to the time to colonoscopy but not to the campaign year. Compared to patients having undergone colonoscopy within 30 days, the odds were significantly reduced by 60% in patients having undergone colonoscopy after 7 months (adjusted Odds-Ratio: 0.4 [0.3; 0.6]; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The French indicators were certainly degraded before the first wave of the COVID-19. The delay in access to colonoscopy as well as its extension induced by the COVID-19 crisis had no impact in terms of cancer severity, due to a discriminatory approach prioritizing patients with evident symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akoï Koïvogui
- CRCDC-IDF, Site de Seine-Saint-Denis, 41 avenue de Verdun, 93146 Bondy, France.
| | - Gaëlle Abihsera
- CRCDC-IDF, Site du Val-de-Marne, Le banc de Sable 7, Quai Gabriel Péri, 94340 Joinville-le-Pont, France
| | - Tu Le Trong
- CRCDC-IDF, Site du Val-d'Oise, Immeuble Le Centaure, 14A Avenue du Centaure, 95800 Cergy Saint-Christophe, France
| | - Hamou Ait-Hadad
- CRCDC-IDF, Site de Seine-et-Marne, 333 Rue Marguerite Perey CS50058, 77563 Lieusaint, France
| | - Agnès Bernoux
- CRCDC-IDF, Site de l'Essonne, Centre Hospitalier de Bligny CS30365, 91640 Fontenay les Briis, France
| | - Hélène Delattre
- CRCDC-IDF, Site des Hauts-de-Seine, 26 rue des Amandiers, 92000 Nanterre, France
| | - Catherine Vincelet
- CRCDC-IDF, Site des Yvelines, 18 av Dutartre, BP 120 - 78153 - Le Chesnay Cedex, France
| | - Rachel Caroll
- CRCDC-IDF, Site du Val-de-Marne, Le banc de Sable 7, Quai Gabriel Péri, 94340 Joinville-le-Pont, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bertels LS, van Asselt KM, van Weert HCPM, Dekker E, Knottnerus BJ. Reasons for No Colonoscopy After an Unfavorable Screening Result in Dutch Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Nationwide Questionnaire. Ann Fam Med 2022; 20:526-534. [PMID: 36443069 PMCID: PMC9705029 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to assess participant-reported factors associated with non-follow-up with colonoscopy in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. METHODS In May 2019, we distributed a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire (n = 4,009) to participants in the Dutch CRC screening program who received a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Among respondents who reported no colonoscopy, we assessed the presence of a contraindication, and those without were compared with those who reported colonoscopy by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Of 2,225 respondents (56% response rate), 730 (33%) reported no colonoscopy. A contraindication was reported by 55% (n = 404). Decisional difficulties (odds ratio [OR] = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.18-0.47), lacking the opportunity to discuss the FIT outcome (OR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.72), and a low estimated risk of CRC (OR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26-0.76) were negatively associated with follow-up. Knowledge items negatively associated with follow-up included having an alternative explanation for the positive FIT (OR = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.21-0.43), having trust in the ability to self-detect CRC (OR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.65), and thinking that polyp removal is ineffective (OR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.43-0.82). The belief that the family physician would support colonoscopy showed the strongest positive association with follow-up (OR = 2.84; 95% CI, 2.01-4.02) CONCLUSIONS: Because decisional difficulties and certain convictions regarding CRC and screening are associated with non-follow-up, personalized screening counseling might be an intervention worth exploring as a means of improving follow-up in the Dutch CRC screening program. Involving family physicians might also prove beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucinda S Bertels
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice, Cancer Center Amsterdam and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands .,Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Socio-Medical Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kristel M van Asselt
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice, Cancer Center Amsterdam and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk C P M van Weert
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice, Cancer Center Amsterdam and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart J Knottnerus
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice, Cancer Center Amsterdam and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Mortality from colorectal cancer is reduced through screening and early detection; moreover, removal of neoplastic lesions can reduce cancer incidence. While understanding of the risk factors, pathogenesis, and precursor lesions of colorectal cancer has advanced, the cause of the recent increase in cancer among young adults is largely unknown. Multiple invasive, semi- and non-invasive screening modalities have emerged over the past decade. The current emphasis on quality of colonoscopy has improved the effectiveness of screening and prevention, and the role of new technologies in detection of neoplasia, such as artificial intelligence, is rapidly emerging. The overall screening rates in the US, however, are suboptimal, and few interventions have been shown to increase screening uptake. This review provides an overview of colorectal cancer, the current status of screening efforts, and the tools available to reduce mortality from colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka Kanth
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - John M Inadomi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Green BB, Baldwin LM, West II, Schwartz M, Coronado GD. Low Rates of Colonoscopy Follow-up After a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test in a Medicaid Health Plan Delivered Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. J Prim Care Community Health 2021; 11:2150132720958525. [PMID: 32912056 PMCID: PMC7488888 DOI: 10.1177/2150132720958525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Follow-up colonoscopy after a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is necessary for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening to be effective. We report colonoscopy follow-up rates after a positive FIT overall and by population characteristics in the BeneFIT demonstration pilot, a Medicaid health insurance plan-delivered mailed FIT outreach program. METHODS In 2016, 2 health insurance plans in Oregon and in Washington state mailed FIT kits to Medicaid patients who, based on claims data, were overdue for CRC screening. We report follow-up colonoscopy completion rates after positive FIT, and differences in completion rates by age, sex, race, ethnicity, preferred language, and number of primary care visits in the prior year. This research was human subjects approved with a waiver of consent for data collection. RESULTS The FIT positivity rates in Health Plan Oregon and Health Plan Washington were 7.9% (39/488) and 14.6% (125/857), respectively. Colonoscopy completion rates within 12 months of the positive test were 35.9% (14/41) in Health Plan Oregon and 32.8% (41/125) in Health Plan Washington. Colonoscopy completion rates were higher among individuals who preferred a language other than English (Non-English speakers 70.0%, English speakers 31.3%, P = .04). CONCLUSION In a health plan-delivered mailed FIT outreach program, follow-up colonoscopy rates after a positive test were low. Additional interventions are needed to assure colonoscopy after a positive FIT test and to reap the benefits of screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Gloria D Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
San Miguel Y, Demb J, Martinez ME, Gupta S, May FP. Time to Colonoscopy After Abnormal Stool-Based Screening and Risk for Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality. Gastroenterology 2021; 160:1997-2005.e3. [PMID: 33545140 PMCID: PMC8096663 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.01.219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The optimal time interval for diagnostic colonoscopy completion after an abnormal stool-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test is uncertain. We examined the association between time to colonoscopy and CRC outcomes among individuals who underwent diagnostic colonoscopy after abnormal stool-based screening. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of veterans age 50 to 75 years with an abnormal fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) between 1999 and 2010. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards to generate CRC-specific incidence and mortality hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for 3-month colonoscopy intervals, with 1 to 3 months as the reference group. Association of time to colonoscopy with late-stage CRC diagnosis was also examined. RESULTS Our cohort included 204,733 patients. Mean age was 61 years (SD 6.9). Compared with patients who received a colonoscopy at 1 to 3 months, there was an increased CRC risk for patients who received a colonoscopy at 13 to 15 months (HR 1.13; 95% CI 1.00-1.27), 16 to 18 months (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.10-1.43), 19 to 21 months (HR 1.28; 95% CI: 1.11-1.48), and 22 to 24 months (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.07-1.47). Compared with patients who received a colonoscopy at 1 to 3 months, mortality risk was higher in groups who received a colonoscopy at 19 to 21 months (HR 1.52; 95% CI 1.51-1.99) and 22 to 24 months (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.03-1.88). Odds for late-stage CRC increased at 16 months. CONCLUSIONS Increased time to colonoscopy is associated with higher risk of CRC incidence, death, and late-stage CRC after abnormal FIT/FOBT. Interventions to improve CRC outcomes should emphasize diagnostic follow-up within 1 year of an abnormal FIT/FOBT result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yazmin San Miguel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California; Moores Cancer Center and Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Joshua Demb
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Maria Elena Martinez
- Moores Cancer Center and Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Samir Gupta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
| | - Folasade P May
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California; Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Implementing a multilevel intervention to accelerate colorectal cancer screening and follow-up in federally qualified health centers using a stepped wedge design: a study protocol. Implement Sci 2020; 15:96. [PMID: 33121536 PMCID: PMC7599111 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01045-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) not only detects disease early when treatment is more effective but also prevents cancer by finding and removing precancerous polyps. Because many of our nation’s most disadvantaged and vulnerable individuals obtain health care at federally qualified health centers, these centers play a significant role in increasing CRC screening among the most vulnerable populations. Furthermore, the full benefits of cancer screenings must include timely and appropriate follow-up of abnormal results. Thus, the purpose of this study is to implement a multilevel intervention to increase rates of CRC screening, follow-up, and referral-to-care in federally qualified health centers, as well as simultaneously to observe and to gather information on the implementation process to improve the adoption, implementation, and sustainment of the intervention. The multilevel intervention will target three different levels of influences: organization, provider, and individual. It will have multiple components, including provider and staff education, provider reminder, provider assessment and feedback, patient reminder, and patient navigation. Methods This study is a multilevel, three-phase, stepped wedge cluster randomized trial with four clusters of clinics from four different FQHC systems. In the first phase, there will be a 3-month waiting period during which no intervention components will be implemented. After the 3-month waiting period, we will randomize two clusters to cross from the control to the intervention and the remaining two clusters to follow 3 months later. All clusters will stay at the same phase for 9 months, followed by a 3-month transition period, and then cross over to the next phase. Discussion There is a pressing need to reduce disparities in CRC outcomes, especially among racial/ethnic minority populations and among populations who live in poverty. Single-level interventions are often insufficient to lead to sustainable changes. Multilevel interventions, which target two or more levels of changes, are needed to address multilevel contextual influences simultaneously. Multilevel interventions with multiple components will affect not only the desired outcomes but also each other. How to take advantage of multilevel interventions and how to implement such interventions and evaluate their effectiveness are the ultimate goals of this study. Trial registration This protocol is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04514341) on 14 August 2020.
Collapse
|
8
|
Dawidowicz S, Le Breton J, Moscova L, Renard V, Bercier S, Brixi Z, Audureau E, Clerc P, Bastuji-Garin S, Ferrat E. Predictive factors for non-participation or partial participation in breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening programmes†. Fam Pract 2020; 37:15-24. [PMID: 31305884 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmz031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND No study has investigated factors associated with non-participation or partial participation in the different combination patterns of screening programmes for all three cancers, that is, breast, colorectal and cervical cancer. METHODS In a retrospective cohort study, we sought to describe combinations of cancer screening participation rates among women in the Val-de-Marne area of France and to identify individual and contextual factors associated with non-participation or partial participation. RESULTS Women aged between 50 and 65 and who were eligible for all three screening programmes (n = 102 219) were analysed in multilevel logistic models, with the individual as the Level 1 variable and the place of residence as the Level 2 variable. The women who did not participate in any of the screening programmes were 34.4%, whereas 30.1%, 24% and 11.5% participated in one, two or all three screening programmes, respectively. Age below 55, a previous false-positive mammography, prior opportunistic mammography only, no previous mammography, membership of certain health insurance schemes (all P < 0.05) and residence in a deprived area (P < 0.001) were independently associated with non-participation or partial participation. We observed a stronger effect of deprivation on non-participation in all three cancers than in combinations of screening programmes. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that the health authorities should focus on improving cancer screenings in general rather than screenings for specific types of cancer, especially among younger women and those living in the most socially deprived areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Dawidowicz
- Primary Care Department, School of Medicine, Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.,Maison de Santé Pluri-professionnelle de Sucy-en-Brie, Sucy-en-Brie, France
| | - Julien Le Breton
- Primary Care Department, School of Medicine, Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.,DHU A-TVB, IMRB, EA 7376 CEpiA (Clinical Epidemiology And Ageing Unit), Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), Créteil, France
| | - Laura Moscova
- Primary Care Department, School of Medicine, Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), Créteil, France
| | - Vincent Renard
- Primary Care Department, School of Medicine, Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.,DHU A-TVB, IMRB, EA 7376 CEpiA (Clinical Epidemiology And Ageing Unit), Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), Créteil, France
| | - Sandrine Bercier
- Primary Care Department, School of Medicine, Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.,Association de Dépistage Organisé des Cancers dans le Val-de-Marne, ADOC, Joinville-le-Pont, France
| | - Zahida Brixi
- Association de Dépistage Organisé des Cancers dans le Val-de-Marne, ADOC, Joinville-le-Pont, France
| | - Etienne Audureau
- DHU A-TVB, IMRB, EA 7376 CEpiA (Clinical Epidemiology And Ageing Unit), Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.,Department of Public Health, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Pascal Clerc
- DHU A-TVB, IMRB, EA 7376 CEpiA (Clinical Epidemiology And Ageing Unit), Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.,Primary Care Department, School of Medicine, Université de Versailles, Versailles, France
| | - Sylvie Bastuji-Garin
- DHU A-TVB, IMRB, EA 7376 CEpiA (Clinical Epidemiology And Ageing Unit), Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.,Department of Public Health, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Emilie Ferrat
- Primary Care Department, School of Medicine, Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.,DHU A-TVB, IMRB, EA 7376 CEpiA (Clinical Epidemiology And Ageing Unit), Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Do socioeconomic factors play a role in nonadherence to follow-up colonoscopy after a positive faecal immunochemical test in the Flemish colorectal cancer screening programme? Eur J Cancer Prev 2019; 29:119-126. [PMID: 31724969 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In Flanders (Belgium), a population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme was started in 2013, coordinated by the Centre for Cancer Detection (CCD) in cooperation with the Belgian Cancer Registry (BCR). The CCD offers a biennial faecal immunochemical test (FIT) to Flemish citizens aged 56-74 years and recommends a colonoscopy when screened positive by FIT. The study objective is to investigate sociodemographic differences in follow-up colonoscopy adherence after a positive FIT. METHODS Characteristics of the study population were derived by linkage of data from the CCD and BCR, linked with data of the Intermutualistic Agency and the Crossroads Bank for Social Security, resulting in aggregated tables to ensure anonymity. A total of 37 834 men and women aged 56-74 years with a positive FIT in 2013-2014 were included. Adherence to follow-up colonoscopy was calculated for age, sex, work intensity at household level, preferential reimbursement status, and first and current nationality. Descriptive analyses and logistic regressions were performed. RESULTS Nonadherence to follow-up colonoscopy was associated with increasing age, and was significantly higher in men [odds ratio (OR), 1.08], participants with a preferential reimbursement status (OR, 1.34), very low work intensity (OR, 1.41), no payed work (OR, 1.38) and other than Belgian nationality by birth (OR, 1.6-4.66). CONCLUSION Adherence to follow-up colonoscopy after a positive FIT differs according to sociodemographic variables. Additional research is needed to explore reasons for nonadherence to colonoscopy and tackle barriers by exploring interventions to increase colonoscopy follow-up adherence after a positive FIT in the Flemish colorectal cancer screening programme.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kaalby L, Rasmussen M, Zimmermann-Nielsen E, Buijs MM, Baatrup G. Time to colonoscopy, cancer probability, and precursor lesions in the Danish colorectal cancer screening program. Clin Epidemiol 2019; 11:659-667. [PMID: 31440102 PMCID: PMC6679696 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s206873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of response time from the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) based screening invitation to the conclusive screening Optical Colonoscopy (OC) on the risk of detecting colorectal cancer (CRC), advanced stage disease and precursor lesions. Patients and methods We used a cross-sectional study design and included all 62,554 screening participants registered in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Database who tested FIT-positive between March 2014 and December 2016. The main exposure was response time, measured as the time from initial invitation to the conclusive OC. Our main outcomes were the probability of being diagnosed with CRC, advanced stage disease or precursor lesions. Results Of the 62,554 FIT-positive participants, 53,171 (85%) received an OC and were eligible for analysis (median age 63.7 years, 56% men). In this group, 3,639 cancers were registered, 2,890 of which were registered with a defined stage of disease (79%), and 1,042 (36%) of these were advanced stage (UICC III & IV). In addition, 17,732 high-risk and 10,605 low-risk adenomas were identified. Compared to participants receiving the conclusive examination within 30 days, those receiving the examination more than 90 days after initial invitation were 3.49 times more likely to be diagnosed with any CRC (OR 3.49 [95% CI, 3.13–3.89]) and 2.10 times more likely to have advanced stage disease (OR 2.10 [95% CI, 1.73–2.56]). Those waiting for the longest were also more likely to have one or more high-risk adenomas (OR 1.59 [95% CI, 1.50–1.68]). Conclusion Increased screening response time was associated with a higher probability of detecting high-risk adenomas, any stage CRC and advanced stage cancer. More research is needed to explain what causes these associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lasse Kaalby
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Morten Rasmussen
- Department of Digestive Diseases K, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Gunnar Baatrup
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schreuders EH, Grobbee EJ, Nieuwenburg SAV, Kapidzic A, van Roon AHC, van Vuuren AJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Spijker WWJ, Izelaar K, Bruno MJ, Kuipers EJ, Spaander MCW. Multiple rounds of one sample versus two sample faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a population-based study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4:622-631. [PMID: 31196734 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30176-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Revised: 04/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer screening requires successive rounds for maximum preventive effect. Advanced neoplasia can bleed intermittently and thus might be missed by single faecal sampling. Few studies have been done on two sample FIT (2-FIT) screening over multiple rounds. Therefore, we compared multiple rounds of one sample FIT (1-FIT) with 2-FIT screening with respect to participation, positive predictive value (PPV), diagnostic yield, and interval colorectal cancer. METHODS In this population-based study, a random selection of asymptomatic individuals aged 50-74 years in the Rotterdam-Rijnmond region, Netherlands, were invited by post for four rounds (every 2 years) of 1-FIT or 2-FIT screening. Key exclusion criteria were a history or colorectal cancer or inflammatory bowel disease, colon imaging in the previous 2 years, and life expectancy of less than 5 years. Per round, invitees received one or two FITs to sample either one or two consecutive bowel movements. OC-Sensor Micro (Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd, Japan) FITs were used by all participants, except the fourth round of screening for the 1-FIT cohort, for which participants used either an OC-Sensor or a FOB-Gold (Sentinel Diagnostics, Milan, Italy). A faecal haemoglobin cutoff concentration of 10 μg/g of faeces in at least one test was used for referral for colonoscopy. FINDINGS Between 2006 and 2015, of 10 008 invited individuals for the 1-FIT cohort, 9787 were eligible for inclusion, of whom 7310 participated at least once in four successive rounds. Of 3197 invited individuals for the 2-FIT cohort, 3131 were eligible for inclusion, and 2269 participated at least once in four successive rounds. In the 1-FIT screening cohort, 74·7% (7310 of 9787) of invitees participated at least once versus 72·5% (2269 of 3131) of invitees in the 2-FIT cohort (p=0·013). Among participants who participated at least once, the cumulative positivity rate over four rounds was 19·2% (1407 of 7310) for the 1-FIT cohort versus 28·5% (647 of 2269) for the 2-FIT cohort (p<0·0001). The cumulative PPV for advanced neoplasia was 33·0% (432 of 1308 colonoscopies) for the 1-FIT cohort versus 24·2% (147 of 607 colonoscopies) for the 2-FIT cohort (p<0·0001). The cumulative diagnostic yield of advanced neoplasia among invited individuals was 4·4% (432 of 9787) for 1-FIT versus 4·7% (147 of 3131) for 2-FIT screening (p=0·46)). FIT interval colorectal cancers were detected in eight (0·1%) of 7310 participants in the 1-FIT cohort and two (0·1%) of 2269 with 2-FIT screening (p=1·00). INTERPRETATION Four rounds of 2-FIT screening with a low faecal haemoglobin cutoff level did not result in a significant increase in diagnostic yield or a decrease in interval colorectal cancers compared with 1-FIT, despite higher colonoscopy demand. Therefore, 1-FIT colorectal cancer screening programmes should be preferred. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline H Schreuders
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Esmée J Grobbee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Stella A V Nieuwenburg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Atija Kapidzic
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Aafke H C van Roon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wolfert W J Spijker
- Regional Organization for Population Screening South-West Netherlands, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Kirsten Izelaar
- Regional Organization for Population Screening South-West Netherlands, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
GPs' perspectives on colorectal cancer screening and their potential influence on FIT-positive patients: an exploratory qualitative study from a Dutch context. BJGP Open 2019; 3:bjgpopen18X101631. [PMID: 31049411 PMCID: PMC6480863 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen18x101631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In the Dutch colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme, individuals receive a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) to do at home. After a positive FIT result, a follow-up colonoscopy is recommended to identify CRC or advanced adenomas (AA). GPs may influence their patients’ decisions on adherence to follow-up by colonoscopy. Aim To explore GPs’ perspectives on the CRC screening programme and their potential influence on FIT-positive patients to follow up with the recommended colonoscopy. Design & setting Semi-structured interviews among GPs in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Method GPs were approached using purposive sampling. Analysis was performed on 11 interviews using open coding and constant comparison. Results All interviewed GPs would recommend FIT-positive patients without obvious contraindications to adhere to a follow-up colonoscopy. If patients were likely to be distressed by a positive FIT result, most GPs described using reassurance strategies emphasising a low cancer probability. Most GPs stressed the probability of false-positive FIT results. Some described taking a positive screening result in CRC screening less seriously than one in breast cancer screening. Most GPs underestimated CRC and AA probabilities after a positive FIT result. When told the actual probabilities, some stated that this knowledge might change the way they would inform patients. Conclusion These results imply that some of the interviewed GPs have too low a perception of the risk associated with a positive FIT result, which might influence their patients’ decision-making. Simply informing GPs about the actual rates of CRC and AA found in the screening programme might improve this risk perception.
Collapse
|
13
|
Azulay R, Valinsky L, Hershkowitz F, Magnezi R. Repeated Automated Mobile Text Messaging Reminders for Follow-Up of Positive Fecal Occult Blood Tests: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019; 7:e11114. [PMID: 30720439 PMCID: PMC6379817 DOI: 10.2196/11114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Revised: 08/25/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) are recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force as a screening method for colorectal cancer (CRC), but they are only effective if positive results are followed by colonoscopy. Surprisingly, a large proportion of patients with a positive result do not follow this recommendation. Objective The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of text messaging (short message service, SMS) in increasing adherence to colonoscopy follow-up after a positive FOBT result. Methods This randomized controlled trial was conducted with patients who had positive CRC screening results. Randomization was stratified by residential district and socioeconomic status (SES). Subjects in the control group (n=238) received routine care that included an alert to the physician regarding the positive FOBT result. The intervention group (n=232) received routine care and 3 text messaging SMS reminders to visit their primary care physician. Adherence to colonoscopy was measured 120 days from the positive result. All patient information, including test results and colonoscopy completion, were obtained from their electronic medical records. Physicians of study patients completed an attitude survey regarding FOBT as a screening test for CRC. Intervention and control group variables (dependent and independent) were compared using chi-square test. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for performing colonoscopy within 120 days for the intervention group compared with the control group while adjusting for potential confounders including age, gender, SES, district, ethnicity, and physicians’ attitude. Results Overall, 163 of the 232 patients in the intervention group and 112 of the 238 patients in the control group underwent colonoscopy within 120 days of the positive FOBT results (70.3% vs 47.1%; OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.49-3.17; P<.001); this association remained significant after adjusting for potential confounders (P=.001). Conclusions A text message (SMS) reminder is an effective, simple, and inexpensive method for improving adherence among patients with positive colorectal screening results. This type of intervention could also be evaluated for other types of screening tests. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03642652; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03642652 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/74TlICijl)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Revital Azulay
- Master of Health Administration Program, Department of Management, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.,Central Laboratory, Meuhedet Health Care, Lod, Israel
| | - Liora Valinsky
- Quality Department, Meuhedet Health Care, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Racheli Magnezi
- Master of Health Administration Program, Department of Management, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Azulay R, Valinsky L, Hershkowitz F, Magnezi R. CRC Screening Results: Patient Comprehension and Follow-up. Cancer Control 2019; 26:1073274819825828. [PMID: 30704290 PMCID: PMC6360471 DOI: 10.1177/1073274819825828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Revised: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fecal occult blood tests are recommended for colorectal cancer screening, but are only effective if colonoscopy follows positive results. Patients with positive results often do not complete follow-up. This study examined the association between patient comprehension and adherence to colonoscopy after positive FIT (Fecal Immunochemical Test). METHODS: Five hundred twenty-two patients completed a telephone questionnaire regarding the FIT and its implications 120 days after a positive result. Patients were asked whether they had the test, received the results, and required follow-up. These questions were used to identify the degree to which patients understood medical information. A participant who answered "no" to any question was defined as having "low comprehension" regarding the FIT, and participants who answered "yes" to all 3 questions, as having "high comprehension". RESULTS: Comprehension and colonoscopy adherence were significantly associated. Adherence to colonoscopy was significantly higher among participants with high comprehension, after adjusting for gender, age, education, ethnicity, and socio-economic status. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a link between health comprehension and patient follow-up after positive FIT and contributes to understanding the implications of health comprehension in terms of health promotion. We recommend patients undergoing screening tests receive clear explanations regarding need for follow-up of positive results thus reducing health disparities associated with health comprehension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Revital Azulay
- Department of Management, MHA Program, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Central Laboratory, Meuhedet Health Care, Lod, Israel
| | - Liora Valinsky
- Department of Clinical Quality, Meuhedet Health Care, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Racheli Magnezi
- Department of Management, MHA Program, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Thomsen MK, Rasmussen M, Njor SH, Mikkelsen EM. Demographic and comorbidity predictors of adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: a nationwide cross-sectional study. Clin Epidemiol 2018; 10:1733-1742. [PMID: 30538577 PMCID: PMC6257139 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s176923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Predictors of participation in colorectal cancer screening with a stool sample screening modality have been widely studied, but adherence to subsequent diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive screening test has received less attention. We aimed to determine predictors of adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from National Health Service registries. We included 8,112 individuals invited to screening between March 3, 2014, and August 31, 2014, who had a positive immunochemical fecal occult blood test. Potential predictors were gender, age, region of residence, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, specific diseases (cardiovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes, and cancer), and number of prior hospital stays. We estimated prevalence proportion differences (PPDs) for the associations between potential predictors and adherence. RESULTS Overall, adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy was 88.6%. Adherence was lower in individuals aged 75 years compared with those aged <70 years, PPD=-4.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -6.19; -2.20). Adherence decreased with a higher level of comorbidity: PPD=-2.30 (95% CI: -3.87; -0.74) for a CCI score of 1-2 and PPD=-9.24 (95% CI: -12.30; -6.19) for a CCI score of ≥3 compared to 0. For specific diseases, adherence was decreased in those with a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, or diabetes, but less for cancer. When comorbidity was measured as number of prior hospital stays, the adjusted PPDs were -2.41 (95% CI: -4.43;-0.39) for one to two stays and -14.50 (95% CI: -20.30; -8.74) for three or more stays compared with no in-hospital stays. CONCLUSION Major predictors of nonadherence to diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive immunochemical fecal occult blood test were older age, a CCI score of 1 or more, cardiovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes, and one or more in-hospital stays within the last year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Morten Rasmussen
- Department of Digestive Diseases K, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sisse Helle Njor
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark,
- Department of Public Health Programs, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Thamarasseril S, Bhuket T, Chan C, Liu B, Wong RJ. The Need for an Integrated Patient Navigation Pathway to Improve Access to Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Testing: A Safety-Net Hospital Experience. J Community Health 2018; 42:551-557. [PMID: 27796633 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-016-0287-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Delays in access to colonoscopy following positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) contribute to increased CRC incidence and mortality. To evaluate intervals from positive FIT result to receipt of colonoscopy among underserved safety-net populations. We retrospectively evaluated all average CRC risk adults who had positive FIT results from 2012 to 2015 at an ethnically diverse safety-net hospital system. Interval from positive FIT to receipt of colonoscopy was evaluated with Kaplan Meier methods and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Among 467 patients with positive FIT (48.4 % men, 39.5 % black, 22.5 % white, 17.4 % Asian, 9.7 % Hispanic, mean age 59.5 ± 9.8 years), mean time from positive FIT to receipt of colonoscopy was 220.5 days (SD 158.5). Compared to men, there was a trend towards longer time from FIT positive to colonoscopy among women (237.1 vs. 198.7 days, p = 0.07). No race/ethnicity-specific disparities in time to colonoscopy were observed. Compared to 2012-2013, there was a 27.2 % reduction in time from FIT positive to colonoscopy in 2014-2015 (173.9 vs. 238.8 days, p < 0.01). Among patients undergoing colonoscopy, 46.3 % had adenomatous polyps, 27.4 % had high risk adenomatous polyps, and 5.6 % had CRC. Among an ethnically diverse safety-net hospital system, improvements in access to colonoscopy after positive FIT were observed. However, patients still waited nearly 6 months from time of positive FIT to undergoing colonoscopy. Delays in receipt of colonoscopy are complex and reflect system-level and individual patient-level barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sreedevi Thamarasseril
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alameda Health System - Highland Hospital, 1411 East 31st Street, Highland Hospital - Highland Care Pavilion 5th Floor, Oakland, CA, 94602, USA
| | - Taft Bhuket
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alameda Health System - Highland Hospital, 1411 East 31st Street, Highland Hospital - Highland Care Pavilion 5th Floor, Oakland, CA, 94602, USA
| | - Chuck Chan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alameda Health System - Highland Hospital, 1411 East 31st Street, Highland Hospital - Highland Care Pavilion 5th Floor, Oakland, CA, 94602, USA
| | - Benny Liu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alameda Health System - Highland Hospital, 1411 East 31st Street, Highland Hospital - Highland Care Pavilion 5th Floor, Oakland, CA, 94602, USA
| | - Robert J Wong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alameda Health System - Highland Hospital, 1411 East 31st Street, Highland Hospital - Highland Care Pavilion 5th Floor, Oakland, CA, 94602, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Oluloro A, Petrik AF, Turner A, Kapka T, Rivelli J, Carney PA, Saha S, Coronado GD. Timeliness of Colonoscopy After Abnormal Fecal Test Results in a Safety Net Practice. J Community Health 2018; 41:864-70. [PMID: 26874943 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-016-0165-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Fecal testing can only reduce colorectal cancer mortality if patients with an abnormal test result receive a follow-up colonoscopy. As part of the Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations (STOP CRC) project, we examined factors associated with adherence to follow-up colonoscopy among patients with abnormal fecal test results. As part of STOP CRC outreach, Virginia Garcia Memorial Health Center staff distributed 1753 fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), of which 677 (39 %) were completed, and 56 had an abnormal result (8 %). Project staff used logistic regression analyses to examine factors associated with colonoscopy referral and completion. Of the 56 patients with abnormal FIT results; 45 (80 %) had evidence of a referral for colonoscopy, 32 (57 %) had evidence of a completed colonoscopy within 18 months, and 14 (25 %) within 60 days of an abnormal fecal test result. In adjusted analysis, Hispanics had lower odds of completing follow-up colonoscopy within 60 days than non-Hispanic whites (adjusted OR 0.20; 95 % CI 0.04, 0.92). Colonoscopy within 60 days trended lower for women than for men (adjusted OR 0.25; 95 % CI 0.06-1.04). Among the 24 patients lacking medical record evidence of a colonoscopy, 19 (79 %) had a documented reason, including clinician did not pursue, patient refused, and colonoscopy not indicated. No reason was found for 21 %. Improvements are needed to increase rates of follow-up colonoscopy completion, especially among female and Hispanic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Oluloro
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR, 97227, USA. .,Oregon Health & Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | - Amanda F Petrik
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Ann Turner
- Virginia Garcia Memorial Health Center, 226 SE 8th Ave, Hillsboro, OR, 97123, USA
| | - Tanya Kapka
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR, 97227, USA.,Virginia Garcia Memorial Health Center, 226 SE 8th Ave, Hillsboro, OR, 97123, USA
| | - Jennifer Rivelli
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Patricia A Carney
- Oregon Health & Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Somnath Saha
- Oregon Health & Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, USA.,Section of General Internal Medicine, Portland VA Medical Center, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Rd. (P3HSRD), Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Gloria D Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Singal AG, Gupta S, Skinner CS, Ahn C, Santini NO, Agrawal D, Mayorga CA, Murphy C, Tiro JA, McCallister K, Sanders JM, Bishop WP, Loewen AC, Halm EA. Effect of Colonoscopy Outreach vs Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017; 318:806-815. [PMID: 28873161 PMCID: PMC5648645 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.11389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach is more effective than colonoscopy outreach for increasing 1-time colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but long-term effectiveness may need repeat testing and timely follow-up for abnormal results. OBJECTIVE Compare the effectiveness of FIT outreach and colonoscopy outreach to increase completion of the CRC screening process (screening initiation and follow-up) within 3 years. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Pragmatic randomized clinical trial from March 2013 to July 2016 among 5999 participants aged 50 to 64 years who were receiving primary care in Parkland Health and Hospital System and were not up to date with CRC screenings. INTERVENTIONS Random assignment to mailed FIT outreach (n = 2400), mailed colonoscopy outreach (n = 2400), or usual care with clinic-based screening (n = 1199). Outreach included processes to promote repeat annual testing for individuals in the FIT outreach group with normal results and completion of diagnostic and screening colonoscopy for those with an abnormal FIT result or assigned to colonoscopy outreach. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcome was screening process completion, defined as adherence to colonoscopy completion, annual testing for a normal FIT result, diagnostic colonoscopy for an abnormal FIT result, or treatment evaluation if CRC was detected. Secondary outcomes included detection of any adenoma or advanced neoplasia (including CRC) and screening-related harms (including bleeding or perforation). RESULTS All 5999 participants (median age, 56 years; women, 61.9%) were included in the intention-to-screen analyses. Screening process completion was 38.4% in the colonoscopy outreach group, 28.0% in the FIT outreach group, and 10.7% in the usual care group. Compared with the usual care group, between-group differences for completion were higher for both outreach groups (27.7% [95% CI, 25.1% to 30.4%] for the colonoscopy outreach group; 17.3% [95% CI, 14.8% to 19.8%] for FIT outreach group), and highest in the colonoscopy outreach group (10.4% [95% CI, 7.8% to 13.1%] for the colonoscopy outreach group vs FIT outreach group; P < .001 for all comparisons). Compared with usual care, the between-group differences in adenoma and advanced neoplasia detection rates were higher for both outreach groups (colonoscopy outreach group: 10.3% [95% CI, 9.5% to 12.1%] for adenoma and 3.1% [95% CI, 2.0% to 4.1%] for advanced neoplasia, P < .001 for both comparisons; FIT outreach group: 1.3% [95% CI, -0.1% to 2.8%] for adenoma and 0.7% [95% CI, -0.2% to 1.6%] for advanced neoplasia, P < .08 and P < .13, respectively), and highest in the colonoscopy outreach group (colonoscopy outreach group vs FIT outreach group: 9.0% [95% CI, 7.3% to 10.7%] for adenoma and 2.4% [95% CI, 1.3% to 3.3%] for advanced neoplasia, P < .001 for both comparisons). There were no screening-related harms in any groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among persons aged 50 to 64 years receiving primary care at a safety-net institution, mailed outreach invitations offering FIT or colonoscopy compared with usual care increased the proportion completing CRC screening process within 3 years. The rate of screening process completion was higher with colonoscopy than FIT outreach. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01710215.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit G Singal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
- Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Samir Gupta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs San Diego Health Care System, San Diego, California
- Department of Internal Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Celette Sugg Skinner
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Chul Ahn
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | | | - Deepak Agrawal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Christian A Mayorga
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Caitlin Murphy
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Jasmin A Tiro
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Katharine McCallister
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Joanne M Sanders
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Wendy Pechero Bishop
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Adam C Loewen
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Ethan A Halm
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
- Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Partin MR, Gravely AA, Burgess JF, Haggstrom DA, Lillie SE, Nelson DB, Nugent SM, Shaukat A, Sultan S, Walter LC, Burgess DJ. Contribution of patient, physician, and environmental factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up for abnormal colorectal cancer screening test results. Cancer 2017; 123:3502-3512. [PMID: 28493543 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2016] [Revised: 04/10/2017] [Accepted: 04/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient, physician, and environmental factors were identified, and the authors examined the contribution of these factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up after a positive fecal occult blood test/fecal immunochemical test (FOBT/FIT) screening. METHODS In total, 76,243 FOBT/FIT-positive patients were identified from 120 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities between August 16, 2009 and March 20, 2011 and were followed for 6 months. Patient demographic (race/ethnicity, sex, age, marital status) and health characteristics (comorbidities), physician characteristics (training level, whether primary care provider) and behaviors (inappropriate FOBT/FIT screening), and environmental factors (geographic access, facility type) were identified from VHA administrative records. Patient behaviors (refusal, private sector colonoscopy use) were estimated with statistical text mining conducted on clinic notes, and follow-up predictors and adjusted rates were estimated using hierarchical logistic regression. RESULTS Roughly 50% of individuals completed a colonoscopy at a VHA facility within 6 months. Age and comorbidity score were negatively associated with follow-up. Blacks were more likely to receive follow-up than whites. Environmental factors attenuated but did not fully account for these differences. Patient behaviors (refusal, private sector colonoscopy use) and physician behaviors (inappropriate screening) fully accounted for the small reverse race disparity and attenuated variation by age and comorbidity score. Patient behaviors (refusal and private sector colonoscopy use) contributed more to variation in follow-up rates than physician behaviors (inappropriate screening). CONCLUSIONS In the VHA, blacks are more likely to receive colonoscopy follow-up for positive FOBT/FIT results than whites, and follow-up rates markedly decline with advancing age and comorbidity burden. Patient and physician behaviors explain race variation in follow-up rates and contribute to variation by age and comorbidity burden. Cancer 2017;123:3502-12. Published 2017. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa R Partin
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Amy A Gravely
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - James F Burgess
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David A Haggstrom
- Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.,Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Sarah E Lillie
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - David B Nelson
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Sean M Nugent
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Aasma Shaukat
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Shahnaz Sultan
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Louise C Walter
- Division of Geriatrics, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Diana J Burgess
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Corley DA, Jensen CD, Quinn VP, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, Lee JK, Schottinger JE, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Ghai NR, Lee AT, Contreras R, Quesenberry CP, Fireman BH, Levin TR. Association Between Time to Colonoscopy After a Positive Fecal Test Result and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Cancer Stage at Diagnosis. JAMA 2017; 317:1631-1641. [PMID: 28444278 PMCID: PMC6343838 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.3634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 189] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is commonly used for colorectal cancer screening and positive test results require follow-up colonoscopy. However, follow-up intervals vary, which may result in neoplastic progression. OBJECTIVE To evaluate time to colonoscopy after a positive FIT result and its association with risk of colorectal cancer and advanced-stage disease at diagnosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective cohort study (January 1, 2010-December 31, 2014) within Kaiser Permanente Northern and Southern California. Participants were 70 124 patients aged 50 through 70 years eligible for colorectal cancer screening with a positive FIT result who had a follow-up colonoscopy. EXPOSURES Time (days) to colonoscopy after a positive FIT result. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Risk of any colorectal cancer and advanced-stage disease (defined as stage III and IV cancer). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were adjusted for patient demographics and baseline risk factors. RESULTS Of the 70 124 patients with positive FIT results (median age, 61 years [IQR, 55-67 years]; men, 52.7%), there were 2191 cases of any colorectal cancer and 601 cases of advanced-stage disease diagnosed. Compared with colonoscopy follow-up within 8 to 30 days (n = 27 176), there were no significant differences between follow-up at 2 months (n = 24 644), 3 months (n = 8666), 4 to 6 months (n = 5251), or 7 to 9 months (n = 1335) for risk of any colorectal cancer (cases per 1000 patients: 8-30 days, 30; 2 months, 28; 3 months, 31; 4-6 months, 31; and 7-9 months, 43) or advanced-stage disease (cases per 1000 patients: 8-30 days, 8; 2 months, 7; 3 months, 7; 4-6 months, 9; and 7-9 months, 13). Risks were significantly higher for examinations at 10 to 12 months (n = 748) for any colorectal cancer (OR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.05-2.08]; 49 cases per 1000 patients) and advanced-stage disease (OR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.14-3.42]; 19 cases per 1000 patients) and more than 12 months (n = 747) for any colorectal cancer (OR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.89-2.68]; 76 cases per 1000 patients) and advanced-stage disease (OR, 3.22 [95% CI, 2.44-4.25]; 31 cases per 1000 patients). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with a positive fecal immunochemical test result, compared with follow-up colonoscopy at 8 to 30 days, follow-up after 10 months was associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer and more advanced-stage disease at the time of diagnosis. Further research is needed to assess whether this relationship is causal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas A. Corley
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | | | - Virginia P. Quinn
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | - Chyke A. Doubeni
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ann G. Zauber
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jeffrey K. Lee
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Joanne E. Schottinger
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | - Amy R. Marks
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Wei K. Zhao
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Nirupa R. Ghai
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | - Alexander T. Lee
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | - Richard Contreras
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | | | - Bruce H. Fireman
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Theodore R. Levin
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tuppin P, Pestel L, Samson S, Cuerq A, Rivière S, Tala S, Denis P, Drouin J, Gissot C, Gastaldi-Ménager C, Fagot-Campagna A. [The human and economic burden of cancer in France in 2014, based on the Sniiram national database]. Bull Cancer 2017; 104:524-537. [PMID: 28285755 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2017.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2016] [Revised: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 01/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The national health insurance information system (Sniiram) can be used to estimate the national medical and economic burden of cancer. This study reports the annual rates, characteristics and expenditure of people reimbursed for cancer. METHODS Among 57 million general health scheme beneficiaries (86% of the French population), people managed for cancer were identified using algorithms based on hospital diagnoses and full refund for long-term cancer. The reimbursed costs (euros) related to the cancer, paid off by the health insurance, were estimated. RESULTS In 2014, 2.491 million people (4.4%) covered by the general health scheme had a cancer managed (men 1.1 million, 5.1%; women 1.3 million, 4.9%). The annual (2012-2014) average growth rate of patients was 0.8%. The spending related to the cancer was 13.5 billion: 5 billion for primary health care (drugs 2.3 billion), 7.5 billion for the hospital (drugs 1.3 billions) and 900 million for sick leave and invalidity pensions. Spending annual average growth rate (2012-2014) was 4% (drugs 2%). The rates of patients and the relative spending were 1.8% and 2.5 billion for the breast cancer (women), 1.5% and 1.0 billion for prostate cancer, 0.9% and 1.5 billion for the colon cancer, and 0.19% and 1.3 billion for lung cancer. DISCUSSION Cancers establish one of the first groups of chronic diseases pathologies in terms of patients and spending. If the numbers of patients remain stables, the spending increases, mainly for medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Tuppin
- Caisse nationale d'assurance maladie des travailleurs salariés (CNAMTS), 26-50, avenue du Professeur-André-Lemierre, 75986 Paris, France.
| | - Laurence Pestel
- Caisse nationale d'assurance maladie des travailleurs salariés (CNAMTS), 26-50, avenue du Professeur-André-Lemierre, 75986 Paris, France
| | - Solène Samson
- Caisse nationale d'assurance maladie des travailleurs salariés (CNAMTS), 26-50, avenue du Professeur-André-Lemierre, 75986 Paris, France
| | - Anne Cuerq
- Caisse nationale d'assurance maladie des travailleurs salariés (CNAMTS), 26-50, avenue du Professeur-André-Lemierre, 75986 Paris, France
| | - Sébastien Rivière
- Caisse nationale d'assurance maladie des travailleurs salariés (CNAMTS), 26-50, avenue du Professeur-André-Lemierre, 75986 Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Tala
- Caisse nationale d'assurance maladie des travailleurs salariés (CNAMTS), 26-50, avenue du Professeur-André-Lemierre, 75986 Paris, France
| | - Pierre Denis
- Caisse nationale d'assurance maladie des travailleurs salariés (CNAMTS), 26-50, avenue du Professeur-André-Lemierre, 75986 Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Drouin
- Caisse nationale d'assurance maladie des travailleurs salariés (CNAMTS), 26-50, avenue du Professeur-André-Lemierre, 75986 Paris, France
| | - Claude Gissot
- Caisse nationale d'assurance maladie des travailleurs salariés (CNAMTS), 26-50, avenue du Professeur-André-Lemierre, 75986 Paris, France
| | - Christelle Gastaldi-Ménager
- Caisse nationale d'assurance maladie des travailleurs salariés (CNAMTS), 26-50, avenue du Professeur-André-Lemierre, 75986 Paris, France
| | - Anne Fagot-Campagna
- Caisse nationale d'assurance maladie des travailleurs salariés (CNAMTS), 26-50, avenue du Professeur-André-Lemierre, 75986 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Plumb AA, Ghanouni A, Rainbow S, Djedovic N, Marshall S, Stein J, Taylor SA, Halligan S, Lyratzopoulos G, von Wagner C. Patient factors associated with non-attendance at colonoscopy after a positive screening faecal occult blood test. J Med Screen 2017; 24:12-19. [PMID: 27216771 DOI: 10.1177/0969141316645629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2024]
Abstract
Background Screening participants with abnormal faecal occult blood test results who do not attend further testing are at high risk of colorectal cancer, yet little is known about their reasons for non-attendance. Methods We conducted a medical record review of 170 patients from two English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme centres who had abnormal guaiac faecal occult blood test screening tests between November 2011 and April 2013 but did not undergo colonoscopy. Using information from patient records, we coded and categorized reasons for non-attendance. Results Of the 170 patients, 82 were eligible for review, of whom 66 had at least one recorded reason for lack of colonoscopy follow-up. Reasons fell into seven main categories: (i) other commitments, (ii) unwillingness to have the test, (iii) a feeling that the faecal occult blood test result was a false positive, (iv) another health issue taking priority, (v) failing to complete bowel preparation, (vi) practical barriers (e.g. lack of transport), and (vii) having had or planning colonoscopy elsewhere. The most common single reasons were unwillingness to have a colonoscopy and being away. Conclusions We identify a range of apparent reasons for colonoscopy non-attendance after a positive faecal occult blood test screening. Education regarding the interpretation of guaiac faecal occult blood test findings, offer of alternative confirmatory test options, and flexibility in the timing or location of subsequent testing might decrease non-attendance of diagnostic testing following positive faecal occult blood test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew A Plumb
- 1 Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alex Ghanouni
- 2 Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sandra Rainbow
- 3 London Hub, Bowel Cancer Screening Programme, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Natasha Djedovic
- 3 London Hub, Bowel Cancer Screening Programme, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Sarah Marshall
- 4 St Marks Screening Centre, St Marks Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Judith Stein
- 5 University College Screening Centre, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Stuart A Taylor
- 1 Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Steve Halligan
- 1 Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abu Hassan MR, Leong TW, Othman Andu DF, Hat H, Nik Mustapha NR. Evaluation of a Colorectal Carcinoma Screening Program in Kota Setar and Kuala Muda Districts, Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2017; 17:569-73. [PMID: 26925645 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2016.17.2.569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A colorectal cancer screening program was piloted in two districts of Kedah in 2013. There is scarcity of information on colorectal cancer screening in Malaysia. OBJECTIVE Thus, this research was conducted to evaluate the colorectal cancer screening program in the districts to provide insights intop its efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A cross sectional study was conducted using data on the colorectal cancer screening program in 2013 involving Kota Setar and Kuala Muda districts in Malaysia. We determined the response rate of immunochemical fecal occult blood test (iFOBT), colonoscopy compliance, and detection rates of neoplasia and carcinoma. We also compared the response of FOBT by demographic background. RESULTS The response rate of FOBT for first iFOBT screening was 94.7% while the second iFOBT screening was 90.7%. Participants from Kuala Muda district were 27 times more likely to default while Indians had a 3 times higher risk of default compared to Malays. The colonoscopy compliance was suboptimal among those with positive iFOBT. The most common finding from colonoscopy was hemorrhoids, followed by tubular adenoma. Detection rate of carcinoma and neoplasia for our program was 1.2%. CONCLUSIONS In summary, the response rate of iFOBT was encouraging but the colonoscopy compliance was suboptimal which led to a considerably low detection rate.
Collapse
|
24
|
Dalton ARH. Incomplete diagnostic follow-up after a positive colorectal cancer screening test: a systematic review. J Public Health (Oxf) 2017; 40:e46-e58. [DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
|
25
|
Chubak J, Garcia MP, Burnett-Hartman AN, Zheng Y, Corley DA, Halm EA, Singal AG, Klabunde CN, Doubeni CA, Kamineni A, Levin TR, Schottinger JE, Green BB, Quinn VP, Rutter CM. Time to Colonoscopy after Positive Fecal Blood Test in Four U.S. Health Care Systems. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016; 25:344-50. [PMID: 26843520 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To reduce colorectal cancer mortality, positive fecal blood tests must be followed by colonoscopy. METHODS We identified 62,384 individuals ages 50 to 89 years with a positive fecal blood test between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2012 in four health care systems within the Population-Based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (PROSPR) consortium. We estimated the probability of follow-up colonoscopy and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall differences in cumulative incidence of follow-up across health care systems were assessed with the log-rank test. HRs and 95% CIs were estimated from multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Most patients who received a colonoscopy did so within 6 months of their positive fecal blood test, although follow-up rates varied across health care systems (P <0.001). Median days to colonoscopy ranged from 41 (95% CI, 40-41) to 174 (95% CI, 123-343); percent followed-up by 12 months ranged from 58.1% (95% CI, 51.6%-63.7%) to 83.8% (95% CI, 83.4%-84.3%) and differences across health care systems were also observed at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months. Increasing age and comorbidity score were associated with lower follow-up rates. CONCLUSION Individual characteristics and health care system were associated with colonoscopy after positive fecal blood tests. Patterns were consistent across health care systems, but proportions of patients receiving follow-up varied. These findings suggest that there is room to improve follow-up of positive colorectal cancer screening tests. IMPACT Understanding the timing of colonoscopy after positive fecal blood tests and characteristics associated with lack of follow-up may inform future efforts to improve follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Andrea N Burnett-Hartman
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado
| | - Yingye Zheng
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Ethan A Halm
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Amit G Singal
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Chyke A Doubeni
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Verma M, Sarfaty M, Brooks D, Wender RC. Population-based programs for increasing colorectal cancer screening in the United States. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 65:497-510. [PMID: 26331705 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Screening to detect polyps or cancer at an early stage has been shown to produce better outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC). Programs with a population-based approach can reach a large majority of the eligible population and can offer cost-effective interventions with the potential benefit of maximizing early cancer detection and prevention using a complete follow-up plan. The purpose of this review was to summarize the key features of population-based programs to increase CRC screening in the United States. A search was conducted in the SCOPUS, OvidSP, and PubMed databases. The authors selected published reports of population-based programs that met at least 5 of the 6 International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) criteria for cancer prevention and were known to the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Interventions at the level of individual practices were not included in this review. IARC cancer prevention criteria served as a framework to assess the effective processes and elements of a population-based program. Eight programs were included in this review. Half of the programs met all IARC criteria, and all programs led to improvements in screening rates. The rate of colonoscopy after a positive stool test was heterogeneous among programs. Different population-based strategies were used to promote these screening programs, including system-based, provider-based, patient-based, and media-based strategies. Treatment of identified cancer cases was not included explicitly in 4 programs but was offered through routine medical care. Evidence-based methods for promoting CRC screening at a population level can guide the development of future approaches in health care prevention. The key elements of a successful population-based approach include adherence to the 6 IARC criteria and 4 additional elements (an identified external funding source, a structured policy for positive fecal occult blood test results and confirmed cancer cases, outreach activities for recruitment and patient education, and an established rescreening process).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manisha Verma
- Research Scientist, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mona Sarfaty
- Director, Program for Climate and Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
| | - Durado Brooks
- Director, Cancer Control Intervention, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Richard C Wender
- Chief Cancer Control Officer, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Correia A, Rabeneck L, Baxter NN, Paszat LF, Sutradhar R, Yun L, Tinmouth J. Lack of follow-up colonoscopy after positive FOBT in an organized colorectal cancer screening program is associated with modifiable health care practices. Prev Med 2015; 76:115-22. [PMID: 25895843 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2014] [Revised: 03/16/2015] [Accepted: 03/21/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND ColonCancerCheck (CCC), Ontario's organized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program, uses guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT). To reduce CRC-related mortality, persons with a positive gFOBT must have colonoscopy. We identified factors associated with failure to have colonoscopy within 6months of a positive gFOBT. METHODS Population-based, retrospective cohort analysis of CCC participants with positive gFOBT (April 2008 to December 2009) using health administrative data. Patient, physician and health care utilization factors associated with a lack of follow-up colonoscopy were identified using descriptive and multivariate analyses. RESULTS There were 21,839 participants with a positive gFOBT; 14,091 (64%) had colonoscopy within 6months. The strongest factors associated with failure to follow-up were recent colonoscopy (in 2years prior vs. >10years or never, OR: 4.31, 95% C.I.: 3.82, 4.86), as well as repeat gFOBT (OR: 6.08, 95% C.I.: 5.46, 6.78) and hospital admission (OR: 4.35, 95% C.I.: 3.57, 5.26) in the follow-up period. CONCLUSION In the first 18months of the CCC Program, 1/3 of those with a positive gFOBT did not have colonoscopy within 6months. Identification of potentially modifiable factors associated with failure to follow up lay the groundwork for interventions to address this critical quality gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriano Correia
- Credit Valley Hospital, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Linda Rabeneck
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Surgery and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Lawrence F Paszat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Lingsong Yun
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Jill Tinmouth
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Blanks RG, Benson VS, Alison R, Brown A, Reeves GK, Beral V, Patnick J, Green J. Nationwide bowel cancer screening programme in England: cohort study of lifestyle factors affecting participation and outcomes in women. Br J Cancer 2015; 112:1562-7. [PMID: 25742470 PMCID: PMC4453681 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2014] [Revised: 01/16/2015] [Accepted: 01/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2006, the National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England (NHSBCSP) began offering routine population-based biennial faecal occult blood testing (FOBt) at ages 60-69. There is, however, limited information on how characteristics of individuals affect participation and outcomes of screening, and we studied this association by linking NHSBCSP data to a large prospective cohort of women. METHODS Electronic linkage of the NHSBCSP and Million Women Study records identified 899 166 women in the study cohort with at least one invitation for screening. NHSBCSP provided information on screening acceptance, FOBt results, screen-detected colorectal cancer and other outcomes. The Million Women Study provided prospectively collected information on personal and lifestyle factors. Multiple regression was used to estimate relative risks (RRs) of factors associated with acceptance and outcomes of screening. RESULTS Overall, 70% of women (628 976/899 166) accepted their first invitation for bowel cancer screening, of whom 9133 (1.5%) were FOBt-positive, 743 (0.1%) had screen-detected colorectal cancer and 3056 (0.5%) had screen-detected colorectal adenoma. Acceptance was lower in women from the most than the least deprived tertile, in South Asians and in Blacks than in Whites, in current than in never smokers and in obese than in normal weight women: adjusted RRs (95% confidence interval) for acceptance vs not, 0.90 (0.90-0.90); 0.77 (0.75-79); 0.94 (0.92-0.96); 0.78 (0.77-0.78); and 0.88 (0.88-0.89), respectively: P<0.001 for each. These factors were also associated with an increased risk of being FOBt-positive and of having screen-detected adenoma, but were not strongly associated with the risk of screen-detected colorectal cancer. Relative risks for screen-detected adenoma were 1.22 (1.12-1.34), 2.46 (1.75-3.45), 1.61 (1.05-2.48), 1.53 (1.38-1.68) and 1.77 (1.60-1.95), respectively (P<0.001 for all, except for Blacks vs Whites P=0.03). Use of hormone therapy for menopause was associated with reduced risk of screen-detected adenoma, RR ever vs never use, 0.87 (0.81-0.93), P<0.001 and colorectal cancer, 0.78 (0.68-0.91), P=0.001. INTERPRETATION Among women in England, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors strongly affect participation in routine bowel cancer screening, risk of being FOBt-positive and risk of having screen-detected colorectal adenoma. However, screen-detected colorectal cancer risk is not strongly related to these factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R G Blanks
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - V S Benson
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - R Alison
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - A Brown
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - G K Reeves
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - V Beral
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J Patnick
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, Public Health England, Fulwood House, Old Fulwood Road, Sheffield S10 3TH, UK
| | - J Green
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Results of nurse navigator follow-up after positive colorectal cancer screening test: a randomized trial. J Am Board Fam Med 2014; 27:789-95. [PMID: 25381076 PMCID: PMC4278960 DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.06.140125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Follow-up after a positive colorectal cancer screening test is necessary for screening to be effective. We hypothesized that nurse navigation would increase the completion of colonoscopy after a positive screening test. METHODS This study was conducted between 2008 and 2012 at 21 primary care medical centers in western Washington State. Participants in the Systems of Support to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening study who had a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or flexible sigmoidoscopy needing follow-up were randomized to usual care (UC) or a nurse navigator (navigation). UC included an electronic health record-based positive FOBT registry and physician reminder system. Navigation included UC plus care coordination and patient self-management support from a registered nurse who tracked and assisted patients until they completed or refused colonoscopy. The primary outcome was completion of colonoscopy within 6 months. After 6 months, both groups received navigation. RESULTS We randomized 147 participants with a positive FOBT or sigmoidoscopy. Completion of colonoscopy was higher in the intervention group at 6 months, but differences were not statistically significant (91.0% in navigation group vs 80.8% in UC group; adjusted difference, 10.1%; P = .10). Reasons for no or late colonoscopies included refusal, failure to schedule or missed appointments, concerns about risks or costs, and competing health concerns. CONCLUSIONS Navigation did not lead to a statistically significant incremental benefit at 6 months. IMPACT Follow-up rates after a positive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test are high in a health care system where UC included a registry and physician reminders. Because of high follow-up rates in a health care system where UC included a registry and physician reminders, and small sample size, we cannot rule out incremental benefits of nurse navigation.
Collapse
|
30
|
Pornet C, Denis B, Perrin P, Gendre I, Launoy G. Predictors of adherence to repeat fecal occult blood test in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program. Br J Cancer 2014; 111:2152-5. [PMID: 25314056 PMCID: PMC4260031 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2014] [Revised: 08/14/2014] [Accepted: 08/20/2014] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Socio-economic, environmental factors and general practitioner (GP) involvement may influence adherence to repeat faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) of organised colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The aim of the study was to identify predictors of adherence to repeat testing. Methods: The populationcomprised people eligible for the third round of a CRC screening programme in a French district (n=118 905). Multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed to identify individual and area-level characteristics associated with ‘compliant participants' participating in the all three rounds vs ‘occasional participants' participating in one or two rounds. Results: Compared to ‘occasional participants', ‘compliant participants' were more likely to participate after receiving a FOBT kit from their GP (odds ratio (OR), 10.7; 95% CI, 10.01–11.5) vs FOBT received at home, and were less likely to live in socio-economically deprived areas (OR, 0.75; 0.70–0.80) and urban areas (OR, 0.94; 0.88–1.00). Conclusions: As for a screening round participation, strategies aimed at improving the participation to a screening programme should target GPs and people living in socially deprived areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Pornet
- 8216;Cancers & Preventions' INSERM U 1086, University of Caen Basse-Normandie, CHU, Caen France
| | - B Denis
- Association pour le dépistage du cancer colorectal en Alsace, 122 rue Logelbach, Colmar, France
| | - P Perrin
- Association pour le dépistage du cancer colorectal en Alsace, 122 rue Logelbach, Colmar, France
| | - I Gendre
- Association pour le dépistage du cancer colorectal en Alsace, 122 rue Logelbach, Colmar, France
| | - G Launoy
- 8216;Cancers & Preventions' INSERM U 1086, University of Caen Basse-Normandie, CHU, Caen France
| |
Collapse
|