Trabectedin is a feasible treatment for soft tissue sarcoma patients regardless of patient age: a retrospective pooled analysis of five phase II trials

Geriatric Assessment of Older Patients Receiving Trabectedin in First-Line Treatment for Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas: The E-TRAB Study from The German Interdisciplinary Sarcoma Group (GISG-13)

E-TRAB was a non-interventional, prospective trial investigating the feasibility and predictive value of geriatric assessments (GA) in older STS patients treated with trabectedin as first-line therapy. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), quality of life and individual clinical benefit assessed by the patient-reported outcome measures QLQ-C30 and PRO-CTCAE. Further, several GA tools were applied and correlated with clinical outcomes and treatment-related toxicities. The final analyses included 69 patients from 12 German-speaking sites. The median age of patients was 78 years (range: 55 to 88). Baseline data on PROs and GA identified a diverse population of older patients with respect to their global health status, although a large proportion of them suffered from limitations, required geriatric help and had a high risk of morbidity. The Cancer and Age Research Group (CARG) score classified 38%, 29% and 23% of the patients with low, intermediate and high risks for therapy-related side effects, respectively. Median OS was 11.2 months [95%CI: 5.6; 19.4]. The study confirmed that trabectedin as first-line treatment in older patients with STS has an acceptable and manageable safety profile. Potential prognostic factors for clinical outcome and therapy-related toxicity were identified among the GA tools. Long Timed Up and Go (TUG) showed a significant correlation to OS and early death, whereas a high CARG score (>9) was associated with an increase in unplanned hospitalizations and the incidence of toxicities grade ≥ 3.

Trabectedin as second-line treatment in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: quality of life and safety outcomes

The choice of second- and later-line options for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (aSTS) should always be considered from the patient's perspective, taking into account the potential impact of treatment on daily activities and quality of life. This review examines data on the safety of trabectedin in the management of patients with aSTS as reported in clinical trials and real-world studies. Evidence indicates that trabectedin exhibits an acceptable and manageable safety profile and is compatible with daily activities. Trabectedin is associated with low rates of toxicity-related discontinuations, few potentially life-threatening toxicities, a lack of apparent cumulative toxicities and low rates of grade 3/4 nausea, vomiting and fatigue. Trabectedin represents a valuable second-line option for aSTS, including in elderly patients.

A review of the efficacy of trabectedin as second-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma

The goal of second-line therapy for most patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma is long-term tumor control without detriment to quality of life. Clinical practice guidelines recommend trabectedin as a second-line option for advanced soft tissue sarcoma as it can provide the necessary balance between these interwoven goals. Cumulative experience with trabectedin in clinical trials and clinical practice has informed its usage such that greater benefit can be derived. In particular, use in earlier lines allows more patients to achieve prolonged tumor control (six or more cycles). Efficacy outcomes are superior when trabectedin is administered as second- versus later-line therapy and when it is used continuously until disease progression.

Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare malignancies of mesenchymal cell origin that display a heterogenous mix of clinical and pathologic characteristics. STS can develop from fat, muscle, nerves, blood vessels, and other connective tissues. The evaluation and treatment of patients with STS requires a multidisciplinary team with demonstrated expertise in the management of these tumors. The complete NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Soft Tissue Sarcoma provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of extremity/superficial trunk/head and neck STS, as well as retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal STS, desmoid tumors, and rhabdomyosarcoma. This portion of the NCCN Guidelines discusses general principles for the diagnosis and treatment of retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal STS, outlines treatment recommendations, and reviews the evidence to support the guidelines recommendations.

Trabectedin in Cancers: Mechanisms and Clinical Applications

Trabectedin, a tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloid, is the first marine antineoplastic agent approved with special anticancer mechanisms involving DNA binding, DNA repair pathways, transcription regulation and regulation of the tumor microenvironment. It has favorable clinical applications, especially for the treatment of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, who failed in anthracyclines and ifosfamide therapy or could not receive these agents. Currently, trabectedin monotherapy regimen and regimens of combined therapy with other agents are both widely used for the treatment of malignancies, including soft tissue sarcomas, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, and non-small-cell lung cancer. In this review, we summarized the basic information and some updated knowledge on trabectedin, including its molecular structure, metabolism in various cancers, pharmaceutical mechanisms, clinical applications, drug combination, and adverse reactions, along with prospections on its possibly more optimal use in cancer treatment.

Systemic Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcomas in the Geriatric Population

OPINION STATEMENT

As the population ages, there will be an increase in the incidence and prevalence of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) within the geriatric population. As this disease disproportionately affects older adults, the percentage of adults >65 years old is expected to increase in the coming years. Geriatric patients are often more vulnerable to disease-related symptoms and have more difficulty tolerating treatment-related side effects. While there are no formal existing guidelines to direct the care of this geriatric patient population, it is of utmost importance to consider each patients' fitness and co-morbidities when selecting treatment plans. This review focuses on the current state of research of older adults with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, highlighting the lack of representation of this patient population in clinical trials. Given that chronological age does not necessarily equate to physiologic age, integration of comprehensive geriatric and quality of life assessments is needed in the care of geriatric patients to help guide therapeutic decisions.

The Role of Trabectedin in Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Background: Systemic chemotherapy for advanced disease is another therapeutic option in the management of metastases in soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Doxorubicin either alone or in combination with ifosfamide has been used as first-line chemotherapy. Furthermore, in the past decade, new drugs have been shown to be effective in the treatment of advanced STS after the failure of first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy: trabectedin, pazopanib and eribulin. However, the appropriate usage of these agents has not been established. Methods: We summarized clinical trials of trabectedin focusing on the efficacy and toxicity of trabectedin in the treatment of STS. Results: Trabectedin can be administered safely and effectively to the patients with advanced STS at second line setting or later. Although trabectedin may be effective as first-line treatment in selected patients, anthracycline-based chemotherapy should be recommended because no regimen in addition to trabectedin has proved to be unequivocally superior to doxorubicin as the first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic STS. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) and homologous recombination (HRe) repair may be of particular importance as efficacy of trabectedin. Conclusion: Trabectedin has shown a favorable toxicity profile and is an alternative therapeutic option in patients with advanced STS.

Treatment Strategy for Elderly Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Surgical resection is the standard treatment for localized soft tissue sarcoma (STS), while systemic chemotherapy for advanced STS may be considered. However, less aggressive treatment is often administered to elderly patients with STS. Undertreatment may compromise the cure rate and survival of these individuals. We review the literatures and emphasize the importance of standard treatment for STS in elderly patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The outcome of surgical resection of STS in older individuals is comparable to that of younger ones, as long as patients are selected based on American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS). Likewise, systemic treatment may prove beneficial as long as the risk of complications is estimated with a geriatric assessment. Elderly patients with STS benefit from standard treatment as long as the risks of surgical and systemic complications are assessed respectively with the ASA-PS and GA. Novel clinical trials with broader eligibility criteria are also necessary for elderly patients because of the increasing population of the elderly patients in the future.

Anlotinib treatment in elderly patients with unresectable or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study

Palliative chemotherapy can improve outcomes in most patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS), but the treatment of elderly patients remains a challenge because of older age, comorbidities and poor performance status. This study retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of the multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib in elderly patients with advanced STS. Eligible patients included those of age at least 60 years, diagnosed with unresectable or metastatic STS, and treated with at least one cycle of anlotinib between June 2018 and September 2020 in our center. Clinical characteristics, treatment response, survival status and adverse events were analyzed by reviewing medical records. The median age of 35 eligible patients was 65 (range, 61-85) years, and the median Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 8 (range, 4-11). Anlotinib as first-line systemic treatment was in 24 (68.6%) patients, and as second-line or third-line treatment in the remaining 11 (31.4%) patients. The objective response rate was 8.6%. The median progression-free survival was 5.5 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-9.6] months and the median overall survival was 14.3 (95% CI, 9.6-19.0) months. Thirteen (37.1%) patients developed at least one grade 3/4 adverse event during anlotinib treatment. Our findings suggest that anlotinib treatment has promising efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile in elderly patients with unresectable or metastatic STS. Prospective controlled trials are needed to compare the safety and efficacy of anlotinib and chemotherapy as first-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced STS.

Uncertainties that threaten the benefit/risk balance in early treatment lines for advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma

Sarcoma oncologists face many uncertainties which can threaten the benefit/risk balance during early management of patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. This point is illustrated by a clinical case involving an elderly patient with comorbidities and a diagnosis of metastatic leiomyosarcoma. The patient was not a candidate for doxorubicin-based chemotherapy because of his cardiac history and was hesitant about systemic chemotherapy, ultimately expressing a preference for a well-tolerated regimen. After evaluating the treatment alternatives, trabectedin was chosen based on its indication for use in persons unsuited to receive anthracyclines and evidence supporting its efficacy and safety in elderly patients. The patient received 17 cycles of trabectedin for a best response of stable disease with good quality of life.

Managing the risk of toxicity in the treatment of elderly patients with soft tissue sarcomas

INTRODUCTION

Nearly half of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) occur after the age of 65 years. Treating these patients is a complex issue in the absence of specific guidelines.

AREAS COVERED

This is a narrative review that summarizes current data on the efficacy and the safety of different treatment strategies in this subpopulation.

EXPERT OPINION

Age per se should not be a limiting factor to treatment. Surgery remains the treatment of choice offering the only chance of cure. The potential for benefit from adjuvant therapies must be discussed in the context of expected treatment-related toxicities and impairment of quality of life. Efficacy of systemic treatment in advanced disease did not differ from that in younger patients. However, safety must be considered when selecting treatments. Managing the risk of toxicity requires an assessment of vulnerabilities with validated tools. The Comprehensive geriatric assessment has become increasingly accepted but need to be validated in STS patients. Frailty should not exclude patients from potentially life-saving therapy. The correction of reversible conditions and active supportive care may make the treatment safer. Future studies are warranted to define better the patterns, benefits, risks of existing treatments. New options remain to be identified to reduce toxicity.

A randomized phase III trial comparing trabectedin to best supportive care in patients with pre-treated soft tissue sarcoma: T-SAR, a French Sarcoma Group trial

BACKGROUND

The French Sarcoma Group assessed the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) of trabectedin versus best supportive care (BSC) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III study included adults with STS who progressed after 1-3 prior treatment lines. Patients were randomized (1 : 1) to receive trabectedin 1.5 mg/m² every 3 weeks or BSC, stratified into L-STS (liposarcoma/leiomyosarcoma) and non-L-STS groups (other histotypes). Patients from the BSC arm were allowed to cross over to trabectedin at progression. The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) confirmed by blinded central review and analyzed in the intention-to-treat population.

RESULTS

Between 26 January 2015 and 5 November 2015, 103 heavily pre-treated patients (60.2% with L-STS) from 16 French centers were allocated to receive trabectedin (n = 52) or BSC (n = 51). Median PFS was 3.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-5.9 months] in the trabectedin arm versus 1.5 months (0.9-2.6 months) in the BSC arm (hazard ratio = 0.39, 95% CI 0.24-0.64, P < 0.001) with benefits observed across almost all analyzed subgroups, but particularly in patients with L-STS (5.1 versus 1.4 months, P = 0.0001). Seven patients (13.7%) in the trabectedin arm (all with L-STS) achieved a partial response, while no objective responses were observed in the BSC arm (P = 0.004). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (44.2% of patients), leukopenia (34.6%), and transaminase increase (32.7%). Health-related 30-item core European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire evidenced no statistical differences between the arms for any domain and at any time point. After progression, 91.8% of patients crossed over from BSC to trabectedin.

CONCLUSION

Trabectedin demonstrates superior disease control to BSC without impairing QoL in patients with recurrent STS of multiple histologies, with greater impact in patients with L-STS.

Current Reality of Treating Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma as Illustrated by Case Studies

In the first-line setting of advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS), the treatment aim generally drives decision-making. Anthracycline combinations with ifosfamide or dacarbazine are more appropriate when the aim is tumour shrinkage, and doxorubicin monotherapy is suitable for tumour control. In patients who progress on anthracycline-based regimens, scope exists for tumour shrinkage with trabectedin and concurrent low-dose radiotherapy. Selecting systemic treatment for patients with advanced STS unsuited to receive standard anthracycline-based therapy often involves complex decision-making as clinical trial evidence comparing alternative options is lacking. Key factors to consider are patient characteristics (e.g., age, medical history, performance status), disease characteristics (e.g., stage, histology), and treatment requirements such as the drug's safety profile, evidence of efficacy by subtype, and approved indication as an alternative first-line treatment option. Real-world data for elderly STS patients derived from retrospective studies and post hoc analyses of clinical trials have particular value in guiding treatment selection and improving the management of this populous but undertreated segment of the STS population.

Chemotherapy and targeted treatments of breast sarcoma by histologic subtype

Introduction: Breast sarcomas (BS) are uncommon and often present both diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Historically, radical surgery has been the mainstay of treatment for localized breast sarcomas. On the other hand, in advanced disease, since they are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms consisting of several different subtypes including angiosarcoma, phyllodes tumor, and pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma, there is a lack of proven specific therapy. As a result, their treatment is based on the soft tissue sarcoma (STS) paradigm, whereas histotype-tailored approaches apply to specific subtypes like dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. To date, advanced stages constitute an incurable form of disease and chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment with the aim of palliation of symptoms and increase in survival.Areas covered: In this manuscript, we review the clinicopathologic characteristics of the most common subtypes of BS, as well as the current treatment landscape of BS, with a particular focus on opportunities and challenges provided by new targeted molecules and immunotherapy.Expert opinion: The treatment approach of advanced BS is based on the pathologic subtype. A true breakthrough has still to be obtained, as the development of new agents in BS suffers from the same weaknesses as in other STS.

Trabectedin for Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Non-Interventional, Retrospective, Multicenter Study of the Italian Sarcoma Group

Simple Summary

Active therapeutic options in advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS), able to induce durable objective responses, are scarce beyond first-line chemotherapy. Thus, new strategies and optimal sequencing in the treatment algorithm for sarcoma represents an utmost clinical challenge. This non-interventional, retrospective, multicenter study of the Italian sarcoma group aimed to provide insights of the real-world efficacy, toxicity, and management of patients with advanced STS treated with trabectedin in clinical practice across Italy. Our findings on 512 pretreated metastatic patients with multiple sarcoma histologies in terms of time-to-event outcomes (median progression-free survival of 5.1 months and median overall survival of 21.6 months) confirm the activity of this regimen in a real-life setting with a manageable and well-characterized safety profile. Our study has corroborated that in real-life clinical practice, trabectedin is mostly given as a second-line treatment to patients with a good performance status and high-grade, metastatic leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma.

Abstract

The Italian Sarcoma Group performed this retrospective analysis of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, pretreated with ≥1 anthracycline-based treatment, and treated with trabectedin every three weeks. Primary endpoint was to describe real-life use of trabectedin across Italy. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Overall, 512 patients from 20 Italian centers were evaluated. Leiomyosarcoma (37.7%)/liposarcoma (30.3%) were the most prevalent histological types (abbreviated as L-sarcoma). Patients received a median of four trabectedin cycles (range: 1–40), mostly as a second-line treatment (~60% of patients). The ORR was 13.7% superior (p < 0.0001) in patients with L-sarcoma compared with patients with non-L-sarcoma (16.6% vs. 9.0%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.1 months, whereas median overall survival (OS) was 21.6 months. Significantly better PFS and OS were observed in patients with L-sarcoma, those with objective responses and/or disease stabilization, treated in an early line and treated with reduced dose. Bone marrow toxicity (61.4%) and transaminase increases (21.9%) were the most common grade 3/4 adverse events. The results of this real-life study suggest that trabectedin is an active treatment, which is mostly given as a second-line treatment to patients with a good performance status and high-grade, metastatic L-sarcoma (clinical trial information: NCT02793050).

Real-world evidence of the efficacy and tolerability of trabectedin in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy and tolerability of trabectedin in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) have been confirmed by various clinical studies involving lipo- and leiomyosarcomas as well as many other subtypes including translocation-related sarcomas. These data have been obtained from randomized phase II and III clinical trials. Studies in real-world clinical practice are necessary to bridge the efficacy-effectiveness gap and complete the body of evidence. Furthermore, reinforcing clinical experience with data from routine clinical practice allows drug management to be optimized and clinical benefits to be maximized.

AREAS COVERED

The present review provides the most significant data on the efficacy of trabectedin in real-world studies, and the interpretation of real-world experience with trabectedin, in patients with advanced STS.

EXPERT OPINION

Trabectedin has demonstrated durable disease control and an adequate safety profile, indicating it to be a suitable long-term treatment drug associated with a good quality of life. Personalized strategies and individualized objectives are the way forward in the management of STS.

Different approaches to advanced soft tissue sarcomas depending on treatment line, goal of therapy and histological subtype

Introduction: Although rapid evolution over the past few years in advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) management has not been without its challenges, it has brought clarity in several areas.Areas covered: This article summarizes the proceedings of the third edition of the Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Evidence and Experience symposium held March 2019 in Madrid, Spain. An update is provided of current approaches to advanced STS management. Case studies illustrate the role of trabectedin in advanced STS management.Expert opinion: First-line treatment of advanced STS requires distinct therapeutic strategies depending on goal: tumor shrinkage or tumor control. Since all sarcoma patients benefit from active treatment irrespective of age or line of therapy, oncologists have a duty to offer active systemic therapies unless the patient is unfit for treatment or chooses to end active treatment. Beyond the first line, histology becomes increasingly relevant for treatment selection. Agents with activity in specific sarcoma subtypes have been identified. Rare tumors represent a substantial medical need requiring strong international collaboration between research groups, pharmaceutical companies, regulatory agencies, and patients to identify active drugs per subtype. Multidisciplinary care in an expert sarcoma center is the primary means of reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with sarcoma.

Efficacy and tolerability of trabectedin in elderly patients with sarcoma: subgroup analysis from a phase III, randomized controlled study of trabectedin or dacarbazine in patients with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma

Background

Treatment options for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients aged ≥65 years (elderly) can be limited by concerns regarding the increased risk of toxicity associated with standard systemic therapies. Trabectedin has demonstrated improved disease control in a phase III trial (ET743-SAR-3007) of patients with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma after failure of anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Since previous retrospective analyses have suggested that trabectedin has similar safety and efficacy outcomes regardless of patient age, we carried out a subgroup analysis of the safety and efficacy observed in elderly patients enrolled in this trial.

Patients and methods

Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to trabectedin (n = 384) or dacarbazine (n = 193) administered intravenously every-3-weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-progression, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, symptom severity, and safety. A post hoc analysis was conducted in the elderly patient subgroup.

Results

Among 131 (trabectedin = 94; dacarbazine = 37) elderly patients, disease characteristics were well-balanced and consistent with those of the total study population. Treatment exposure was longer in patients treated with trabectedin versus dacarbazine (median four versus two cycles, respectively), with a significantly higher proportion receiving prolonged therapy (≥6 cycles) in the trabectedin arm (43% versus 23%, respectively; P = 0.04). Elderly patients treated with trabectedin showed significantly improved PFS [4.9 versus 1.5 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR)=0.40; P = 0.0002] but no statistically significant improvement in OS (15.1 versus 8.0 months, respectively; HR = 0.72; P = 0.18) or ORR (9% versus 3%, respectively; P = 0.43). The safety profile for elderly trabectedin-treated patients was comparable to that of the overall trabectedin-treated study population.

Conclusions

This subgroup analysis of the elderly population of ET743-SAR-3007 suggests that elderly patients with STS and good performance status can expect clinical benefit from trabectedin similar to that observed in younger patients.

Trial registration

www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01343277.

Sarcomas and old age: few options for such a large patient population

Although 40% of cases of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are diagnosed in patients aged ≥65 years, this group is largely excluded from or under-represented in clinical trials and receives disproportionately less treatment than younger patients. Pooled analyses and subgroup analyses of Phase II and III randomized controlled trials of systemic therapy in advanced STS suggest the need to revisit this treatment paradigm. In various analyses, efficacy outcomes in older patients did not differ from those in younger patients or in the overall population. Available evidence supports treating elderly STS patients with similar treatment as that for younger patients. However, as some treatments are less well tolerated in older patients, safety must be considered when selecting treatment. As physiological rather than chronological age is a more appropriate criterion for treatment selection, geriatric assessment has a central role in trial design and routine clinical practice. The majority of evidence for the efficacy and safety of systemic therapy in elderly, advanced STS patients has been generated with trabectedin, which is the only agent approved for first-line use in patients unsuited to receive doxorubicin-based regimens.

Safety and efficacy of Pazopanib in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: PALETTE (EORTC 62072) subgroup analyses

BACKGROUND

PALETTE is a phase 3 trial that demonstrated single-agent activity of pazopanib in advanced soft tissue sarcomas (aSTS). We performed retrospective subgroup analyses to explore potential relationships between patient characteristics, prior lines of therapy, dose intensity, and dose modifications on safety and efficacy of pazopanib in aSTS.

METHODS

PALETTE compared pazopanib with placebo in patients with aSTS (age ≥ 18 years) whose disease had progressed during or following prior chemotherapy. In these subgroup analyses, median progression-free survival (mPFS) among patients receiving pazopanib was the efficacy outcome of interest. Adverse events (AEs) were also compared within subgroups. All analyses were descriptive and exploratory.

RESULTS

A total of 246 patients received pazopanib in the PALETTE study. The mPFS was longer in patients who had only 1 prior line versus 2+ prior lines of therapy (24.7 vs 18.9 weeks, respectively); AE rates were similar regardless of number of prior lines of therapy. The mPFS was similar in patients aged < 65 and ≥ 65 y (20.0 and 20.1 weeks, respectively). Although AEs leading to study discontinuation were higher in older patients (≥65 y, 30%; < 65 y, 17%), rates of dose reductions, dose interruptions, and serious AEs were similar between the 2 age groups. No reduction in mPFS was noted in patients requiring dose reductions or dose interruptions to manage toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer mPFS was observed in patients receiving pazopanib following only 1 line of therapy. Additionally, mPFS with pazopanib was maintained regardless of patient age or dose modifications used to manage toxicity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00753688 , first posted September 16, 2008 (registered prospectively).

Preserving quality of life as a key treatment goal in advanced soft tissue sarcomas

INTRODUCTION

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a patient-reported outcome that addresses patients' perceptions of symptoms across physical, emotional, cognitive and social domains. As HRQoL is currently rarely measured outside clinical trials in oncology, it must be inferred from patients' everyday performance during treatment. To gain insight into the HRQoL of advanced STS patients receiving palliative treatment in clinical practice, three case studies of patients treated with trabectedin are examined. Areas covered: The patient in Case 1 has maintained complete remission for more than 8 years after receiving nine cycles of second-line trabectedin followed by secondary surgery for recurrent myxoid liposarcoma, and was able to resume normal activities during trabectedin treatment. Case 2 describes 10 years' follow-up of a patient with myxoid liposarcoma who remains well after many lines of chemotherapy including extended use of trabectedin in the second line. The third case illustrates the feasibility of extending survival time in an elderly patient with metastatic leiomyosarcoma who was able to maintain a busy and active lifestyle while receiving second-line trabectedin. Expert commentary: Owing to its relatively benign safety profile, trabectedin frequently permits prolonged therapy and is generally well tolerated, often allowing patients to carry on with normal daily activities.

A noninterventional, multicenter, prospective phase IV study of trabectedin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma

This prospective, noninterventional study is the first phase IV trial designed to evaluate trabectedin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma in real-life clinical practice across Europe. To be included in the study, patients must have received more than or equal to one cycle of trabectedin and be currently on treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as defined by investigators. The secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate, time to progression and the growth modulation index (GMI), overall survival, and an assessment of the cancer-related symptoms and safety. A total of 218 patients from 41 European centers were evaluated. Patients received a median of six cycles per patient, mostly on an outpatient basis (n=132; 60.6%). The median progression-free survival was 5.9 months, with 70 and 49% of patients free from progression at 3 and 6 months after treatment, respectively. Three (1.4%) patients achieved a complete response and 55 (25.2%) patients achieved a partial response for an objective response rate of 26.6%. A total of 85 (39.0%) patients had disease stabilization for a disease control rate of 65.6%. The median GMI was 0.8, with 5.1 and 38.8% of patients with a GMI of greater than 1.1 to less than 1.33 and greater than or equal to 1.33, respectively. The median overall survival was 21.3 months. Febrile neutropenia (2.3% of patients), neutropenia, nausea, and pneumonia (1.4% each) were the most common trabectedin-related grade 3/4 serious adverse drug reactions. Trabectedin confers clinically meaningful long-term benefits to patients with multiple soft tissue sarcoma histotypes, being either comparable or better than those observed previously in clinical trials, and with a manageable safety profile.

Uterine sarcoma - current perspectives

Uterine sarcomas comprise a group of rare tumors with differing tumor biology, natural history and response to treatment. Diagnosis is often made following surgery for presumed benign disease. Currently, preoperative imaging does not reliably distinguish between benign leiomyomas and other malignant pathology. Uterine leiomyosarcoma is the most common sarcoma, but other subtypes include endometrial stromal sarcoma (low grade and high grade), undifferentiated uterine sarcoma and adenosarcoma. Clinical trials have shown no definite survival benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy and have been hampered by the rarity and heterogeneity of these disease types. There is a role of adjuvant treatment in carefully selected cases following multidisciplinary discussion at sarcoma reference centers. In patients with metastatic disease, systemic chemotherapy can then be considered. There is activity of a number of agents, including doxorubicin, trabectedin, gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, eribulin and pazopanib. Patients should be considered for clinical trial entry where possible. Close international collaboration is important to allow progress in this group of diseases.

Targeted therapy for soft tissue sarcomas in adolescents and young adults

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors originating from the mesenchyme. Even though they affect individuals in all age groups, the prevalence of subtypes of STSs changes significantly from childhood through adolescence into adulthood. The mainstay of therapy is surgery, with or without the addition of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. These treatment modalities are associated, in many cases, with significant morbidity and, given the heterogeneity of tumor histologies encompassed by the term "STS", have not uniformly improved outcomes. Moreover, some subgroups of STSs appear to be more, and others less, responsive to conventional chemotherapy agents. Over the last two decades, our understanding of the biology of STSs is slowly increasing, allowing for the development of more targeted therapies. We review the new treatment modalities that have been tested on patients with STSs, with a special focus on adolescents and young adults, a group of patients that is often underrepresented in clinical trials and has not received the dedicated attention it deserves, given the significant differences in biology and treatment response in comparison to children and adults.

Pharmacological therapies for Liposarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Liposarcoma (LS) is one of the most common adult soft tissue sarcomas (STS). For metastatic disease, systemic treatment options were historically represented by standard cytotoxic chemotherapy. More recently, innovative therapies have been introduced and they are currently part of the therapeutic armamentarium, positively impacting disease control and patients' quality of life. Moreover, in the last decade, a better understanding of the molecular characteristics of each STS subtype allowed to detect new potential targets and develop novel, biology-driven compounds at different stages of testing. Areas covered: This review is focused on LS, retracing their pharmacological management, starting with a summary of results achieved with standard chemotherapy, then moving to a deeper analysis on data obtained with new, approved therapies and finally reporting an update on ongoing clinical trials, thus providing an overview on the current scenario and outlining how it might evolve in the coming years. Expert commentary: Important strides have been made in the knowledge and treatment of LS. Peculiar molecular features and fundamental signalling pathways represent nowadays druggable targets for novel therapies. However, predictive biomarkers still need to be identified in order to better select the target population, to possibly test combinations of drugs, with the ultimate goal of improving outcomes.

Treatment of soft tissue sarcoma: a focus on earlier stages

Surgery, with or without radiation therapy, is the standard of care for primary soft tissue sarcoma, with adjuvant/neodjuvant chemotherapy playing a role only in high-risk patients. Chemotherapy is generally the principal treatment modality for locally advanced or metastatic disease. Within this context, newer techniques and promising new treatments are challenging traditional treatment paradigms. For example, identification of histology-specific treatments is leading the field toward individualized care, with better outcomes. Patients over 65 years represent a sizable and largely undertreated sector of the soft tissue sarcoma population, with many being unsuited to receive anthracycline- or ifosfamide-based chemotherapy. First-line treatment options in this population are discussed.

Efficacy of trabectedin for the treatment of liposarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Trabectedin (ET-743) is a synthetic marine derived alkylating agent, extracted originally from a Caribbean Sea sponge. It is approved for the treatment of Soft Tissue sarcomas (STS) in Europe and recently by the FDA for liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas.

AREAS COVERED

Trabectedin has multiple mechanisms of action, including one targeting the FUS-CHOP oncogene in Myxoid/Round cell Liposarcomas. Numerous Phase I, II and III clinical trials have been conducted with Trabectedin. It has been studied as monotherapy or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. The recommended dose based on clinical trials is 1.5 milligrams/m(2) continuous infusion over 24 hours once every 3 weeks for STS with evidence of disease control in multiple clinical trials at this dose. The most common Grade 3/4 toxicities include neutropenia and transient noncumulative elevations of ALT and AST. Steroid pretreatment has shown efficacy in reducing liver and bone marrow toxicity. In phase III testing comparing trabectedin to dacarbazine, trabectedin was associated with a significantly improved progression free survival rate in patients with advanced lipo- and leiomyosarcomas.

EXPERT OPINION

Trabectedin is an important new addition to the limited treatment options currently available for STS, especially for patients with liposarcoma that have progressed on standard chemotherapeutic regimens.

Metastatic extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma treated with trabectedin: A case report

The Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT) comprises a number of rare malignant tumors. Standard first-line treatment for patients with these tumors includes chemotherapy with a five-drug regimen of vincristine, doxorubicin (Adriamycin^®) and cyclophosphamide, alternating with ifosfamide and etoposide (VAC/IE). In cases of inadequate response, there are a number of second-line regimens available. However, further treatment options are required for those patients with disease unresponsive to standard treatment. Trabectedin is a novel treatment option for patients with ESFT. The present study reports the case of a Caucasian 69-year-old female patient who presented with a soft tissue mass on the chest wall that had developed 7 months earlier. A computed tomography scan revealed a 9×8×7-cm mass on the anterior chest wall above the pectoral muscle. Histopathological evaluations and molecular analysis indicated that it was consistent with a metastatic extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma. The patient was treated with an alternating VAC/IE regimen; however, an inadequate response was observed. The patient received second-line treatment with a gemcitabine and dacarbazine combination regimen, but the disease progressed. Subsequently, treatment with trabectedin (1.5 mg/m² as a 24-h continuous infusion every 3 weeks) was initiated. Trabectedin treatment resulted in long-lasting (18 months) progression-free survival. It is vital that novel drugs continue to being developed for patients with ESFT following progression subsequent to standard chemotherapy. The current report presents a case of a patient with metastatic, pre-treated Ewing's sarcoma achieving disease stabilization with trabectedin. Based on these results and the observed tolerability profile, trabectedin represents an alternative treatment for patients with ESFT. Further studies are required in order to determine the efficacy of trabectedin as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs. It is also important to identify which tumor subtypes, specific translocations and patient profiles will benefit the most from treatment with trabectedin.

Trabectedin for the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas

INTRODUCTION

Trabectedin, a marine-derived DNA-binding antineoplastic agent, has been registered by the EMA and recently also by the FDA for the treatment of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), a rare and heterogeneous disease.

AREAS COVERED

The antitumor activity of trabectedin is related both to direct effects on cancer cells, such as growth inhibition, cell death and differentiation, and indirect effects related to its anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic properties. Furthermore, trabectedin is the first compound that targets an oncogenic transcription factor with high selectivity in mixoid liposarcomas. This peculiar mechanism of action is the basis of its clinical development. The clinical pharmacology of trabectedin, the subsequent phase I, II and III trials are summarized and put into perspectives in this review.

EXPERT OPINION

Trabectedin is a relevant pleiotropic antitumoral agent within the complex scenario of the management of STS. It can be used in advanced STS, either after failure of anthracyclines and ifosfamide or in patients unfit for these drugs, especially when reaching a high-tumor control and a long-term benefit is a priority. Toxicity profile is acceptable and manageable with no reported cumulative toxicities. Therefore, trabectedin has become one relevant therapeutic option in metastatic STS, especially in selected histologies.

Long-term response to first-line trabectedin in an elderly female patient with a metastatic leiomyosarcoma unfit for anthracycline

Systemic chemotherapy comprising anthracycline monotherapy is the standard regimen for metastatic soft tissue sarcomas, particularly leiomyosarcomas, which have limited sensitivity to ifosfamide. However, the optimal chemotherapy regimen for elderly patients, especially those considered unfit for anthracyclines, is undefined. Trabectedin is a potent marine-derived antineoplastic drug with documented activity in liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas. It is registered in Europe for the treatment of adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, after failure of anthracyclines and ifosfamide, or who are unsuited to receive these agents. We report the long-term response to first-line trabectedin therapy in an elderly patient with metastatic leiomyosarcoma unfit for standard therapy. A 66-year-old woman underwent resection of a pelvic epithelioid leiomyosarcoma with positive margins in December 2002, followed by postoperative radiotherapy. In February 2012, she was diagnosed with multiple lung lesions and local relapse in the pelvis. As she was considered unsuitable for both anthracycline and ifosfamide because of cardiovascular comorbidities and because she was highly anxious at the prospect of developing alopecia, vomiting, and fatigue, we commenced treatment with trabectedin at 75% of the standard dose of 1.5 mg/m² every 3 weeks. Treatment was well tolerated, and the patient continued treatment for 25 cycles, with disease stabilization according to the RECIST criteria and a partial response according to the Choi criteria. Disease progression was observed in November 2013 and the patient died 20 months after the diagnosis of metastases. Trabectedin may represent an alternative option for highly selected elderly patients with metastatic sarcoma and unfit for anthracyclines; careful monitoring of toxicities is strongly recommended.

Drug-induced hepatotoxicity in cancer patients - implication for treatment

INTRODUCTION

All anticancer drugs can cause idiosyncratic liver injury. Therefore, hepatoprotective agents assume particular importance to preserve liver function. Hepatic injury represents 10% of cases of acute hepatitis in adults; drug-related damage is still misjudged because of relative clinical underestimation and difficult differential diagnosis. Chemotherapeutic agents can produce liver toxicity through different pathways, resulting in different categories of liver injuries, but these drugs are not homogeneously hepatotoxic. Frequently, anticancer-induced hepatotoxicity is idiosyncratic and influenced by multiple factors.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this paper is to perform a review of the literature regarding anticancer-induced liver toxicity. We described hepatotoxicity mechanisms of principal anticancer agents and respective dose reductions. Furthermore, we reviewed studies on hepatoprotectors and their optimal use. Tiopronin, magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate and S-Adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) demonstrated, in some small studies, a potential hepatoprotective activity.

EXPERT OPINION

Actually, in the literature only small experiences are reported. Even though hepatoprotective agents seem to be useful in the oncologic setting, the lack of well-designed prospective Phase III randomized controlled trials is a major limit in the introduction of hepatoprotectors in cancer patients and these kind of studies are warranted to support their use and to give further recommendations for the clinical practice.

The value of trabectedin in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a group of rare tumors accounting for less than 1% of all adult malignant tumors, a heterogeneous group of more than 50 histological subtypes. Five percent to 30% of STS patients experience local recurrence and 10%–38% present with clinically detectable metastases. Doxorubicin either alone or in combination with ifosfamide has been used as first-line chemotherapy for advanced disease. After failure of first-line chemotherapy, high-dose ifosfamide, gemcitabine + docetaxel, and dacarbazine may be applicable, although high-level evidence is lacking. Trabectedin is a synthetic, marine-derived alkylating agent derived from the Caribbean tunicate, Ecteinascidia turbinata. Several clinical trials have shown that trabectedin has a favorable toxicity profile and is an alternative therapeutic option in adult patients with advanced STS who have not responded to treatment with doxorubicin and ifosfamide. Several clinical trials also recommend the 24-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks regimen. The most frequently reported grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia and elevated serum levels of AST/ALT. Steroid pretreatment is an effective way of reducing the extent of hepatotoxicity, and steroids are now given routinely before trabectedin administration. Further studies are ongoing to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of trabectedin with other agents.

Efficacy of trabectedin in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: beyond lipo- and leiomyosarcoma

Objective

Trabectedin is effective in leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma, especially the myxoid variant, related to the presence of the FUS-CHOP transcript. We evaluated the efficacy of trabectedin in specific subgroups of patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

Methods

Seventy-two patients with advanced anthracycline-pretreated STS, who received trabectedin at a dose of 1.5 mg/m² every 3 weeks by continuous 24-hour infusion, were retrospectively analyzed. Best response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria and severe adverse events (AEs) according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE v4.02) were evaluated. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival (OS).

Results

Median age was 48 (range, 20–75) years, with a median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0. The median number of previous chemotherapy regimens was 1 (range, 0–5). Median number of trabectedin cycles was 3 (range, 1–17). About 69/72 patients (95.8%) were evaluable for response: 9 patients (13%) achieved partial response and 26 (37.7%) stable disease. According to histotype, clinical benefit (partial response + stable disease) was reported in synovial sarcoma (n=5), retroperitoneal liposarcoma (n=10), myxoid liposarcoma (n=5), leiomyosarcoma (n=8), high-grade undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n=5), Ewing/peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor (n=1), and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (n=1). Any grade AEs were noncumulative, reversible, and manageable. G3/G4 AEs included anemia (n=1, 1.4%), neutropenia (n=7, 9.6%), liver toxicity (n=6, 8.3%), and fatigue (n=2, 2.8%). With a median follow-up time of 11 (range, 2–23) months, median progression-free survival and OS of the entire cohort were 2.97 months and 16.5 months, respectively.

Conclusion

Our experience confirms trabectedin as an effective therapeutic option for metastatic lipo- and leiomyosarcoma and suggests promise in synovial sarcomas and high-grade undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma.

Targeted Chemotherapy in Bone and Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

Historically surgical intervention has been the mainstay of therapy for bone and soft-tissue sarcomas, augmented with adjuvant radiation for local control. Although cytotoxic chemotherapy revolutionized the treatment of many sarcomas, classic treatment regimens are fraught with side effects while outcomes have plateaued. However, since the approval of imatinib in 2002, research into targeted chemotherapy has increased exponentially. With targeted therapies comes the potential for decreased side effects and more potent, personalized treatment options. This article reviews the evolution of medical knowledge regarding sarcoma, the basic science of sarcomatogenesis, and the major targets and pathways now being studied.

Efficacy and Safety of Trabectedin or Dacarbazine for Metastatic Liposarcoma or Leiomyosarcoma After Failure of Conventional Chemotherapy: Results of a Phase III Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

This multicenter study, to our knowledge, is the first phase III trial to compare trabectedin versus dacarbazine in patients with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma after prior therapy with an anthracycline and at least one additional systemic regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive trabectedin or dacarbazine intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), secondary end points were disease control-progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression, objective response rate, and duration of response-as well as safety and patient-reported symptom scoring.

RESULTS

A total of 518 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either trabectedin (n = 345) or dacarbazine (n = 173). In the final analysis of PFS, trabectedin administration resulted in a 45% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death compared with dacarbazine (median PFS for trabectedin v dacarbazine, 4.2 v 1.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.55; P < .001); benefits were observed across all preplanned subgroup analyses. The interim analysis of OS (64% censored) demonstrated a 13% reduction in risk of death in the trabectedin arm compared with dacarbazine (median OS for trabectedin v dacarbazine, 12.4 v 12.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.87; P = .37). The safety profiles were consistent with the well-characterized toxicities of both agents, and the most common grade 3 to 4 adverse effects were myelosuppression and transient elevation of transaminases in the trabectedin arm.

CONCLUSION

Trabectedin demonstrates superior disease control versus conventional dacarbazine in patients who have advanced liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma after they experience failure of prior chemotherapy. Because disease control in advanced sarcomas is a clinically relevant end point, this study supports the activity of trabectedin for patients with these malignancies.

A comprehensive safety evaluation of trabectedin and drug-drug interactions of trabectedin-based combinations

Trabectedin (Yondelis(®)) is a potent marine-derived antineoplastic drug with high activity against various soft tissue sarcoma (STS) subtypes as monotherapy, and in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) for the treatment of patients with relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. This article reviews the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of trabectedin. Records were identified using predefined search criteria using electronic databases (e.g. PubMed, Cochrane Library Database of Systematic Reviews). Primary peer-reviewed articles published between 1 January 2006 and 1 April 2014 were included. The current safety and tolerability profile of trabectedin, based on the evaluation in clinical trials of patients treated with the recommended treatment regimens for STS and recurrent ovarian cancer, was reviewed. Trabectedin as monotherapy or in combination with PLD, was not associated with cumulative and/or irreversible toxicities, such as cardiac, pulmonary, renal, or oto-toxicities, often observed with other common chemotherapeutic agents. The most common adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were myelosuppression and transient hepatic transaminase increases that were usually not clinically relevant. However, trabectedin administration should be avoided in patients with severe hepatic impairment. Serious and fatal ADRs were likely to be related to pre-existing conditions. Doxorubicin or PLD, carboplatin, gemcitabine, or paclitaxel when administered before trabectedin, did not seem to influence its pharmacokinetics. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 has an important role in the metabolism of trabectedin, suggesting a risk of drug-drug interactions with trabectedin used in combination with other CYP3A4 substrates. Trabectedin has a favorable risk/efficacy profile, even during extended treatment in pretreated patients.

Optimizing the use of trabectedin for advanced soft tissue sarcoma in daily clinical practice

SUMMARY 

Compared with conventional chemotherapy for advanced soft tissue sarcoma, trabectedin has several distinguishing characteristics which, when optimized, may maximize clinical benefits for patients. In this review, evidence is examined with the aim of answering some vital questions about the use of trabectedin in clinical practice. Who should be treated? When should patients be treated? For how long should patients be treated? What is the safety profile of trabectedin? How should trabectedin be administered?

In brief, trabectedin has shown activity and clinical benefit in nearly all subtypes of soft tissue sarcoma. Improved efficacy outcomes are observed when trabectedin is administered as second-line therapy compared with later-line use. In line with this observation, the European Society for Medical Oncology clinical practice guidelines for soft tissue sarcoma recommend use of trabectedin in the second-line setting. Trabectedin has a role for treatment of elderly patients in whom alternatives are lacking, and can be administered for prolonged periods without cumulative toxicity. A statistically significant improvement in median progression-free survival has been observed when trabectedin is administered uninterrupted until disease progression. The flexibility of trabectedin administration in terms of dose, interval and duration allows for patient-tailored treatment optimization.

Trabectedin clinical cases: use according to indication in diverse clinical scenarios

SUMMARY 

Background: Key distinguishing characteristics of trabectedin in the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma are its prolonged tumor control activity in multiple histological subtypes, positive outcomes in translocation-related sarcomas, maintenance of response, option to rechallenge after treatment interruption and lack of cumulative toxicity. Trabectedin is indicated for use in advanced soft tissue sarcoma after failure of anthracyclines and ifosfamide, or as front-line treatment in patients unsuited to receive these agents. Methods: In this review, cases studies are presented in which trabectedin was used according to its indication but in diverse clinical settings. Results: As second-line treatment of uterine leiomyosarcoma, trabectedin produced prolonged tumor control with good quality of life. In treatment of recurrent synovial sarcoma, the best objective response (partial response) and longest disease control (37 months) was achieved under treatment with trabectedin. As neoadjuvant treatment of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma in a patient unsuited to receive doxorubicin-based chemotherapy, trabectedin induced a pathological response with 85% of necrosis. Conclusion: These cases illustrate the broad range of indications for trabectedin in advanced soft tissue sarcoma and highlight how its unique characteristics can be optimized to achieve maximum clinical benefit.

Phase I study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of trabectedin with docetaxel in patients with advanced malignancies

PURPOSE

Combination therapy with trabectedin and docetaxel was evaluated in patients with advanced malignancies.

METHODS

In this open-label phase 1 study, docetaxel (60 or 75 mg/m(2); 1-h intravenous infusion) was given on day 1 of a 21-day cycle in combination with escalating doses of trabectedin (0.4-1.3 mg/m(2) by 3-h intravenous infusion, 1 h after docetaxel) and prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) as primary objective and safety, plasma pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity as secondary objectives were assessed.

RESULTS

Patients (N = 49) received a median of four cycles of treatment. MTD was 1.3 mg/m(2) trabectedin and 60 mg/m(2) docetaxel for patients with limited and 1.1 mg/m(2) trabectedin and 60 mg/m(2) docetaxel for patients with unlimited prior chemotherapy. Dose-limiting toxicities (during cycle 1) included elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and fatigue in patients with limited prior chemotherapy and elevated ALT and febrile neutropenia in those with unlimited prior chemotherapy. The most common drug-related adverse events were nausea (65 %), fatigue (63 %), and neutropenia (53 %). One patient achieved a complete response. Thirty patients had stable disease, and 11 had stable disease for ≥6 months. Pharmacokinetic results for trabectedin plus docetaxel were similar to those previously reported for the single agents.

CONCLUSION

In patients with previously treated, advanced malignancies, the combination of therapeutic doses of trabectedin and docetaxel showed clinical activity and was tolerable with prophylactic G-CSF, with no evidence of clinically important drug interactions.

Trabectedin: Supportive care strategies and safety profile

Trabectedin is an approved antineoplastic agent for the treatment of adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas or in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with relapsed platinum sensitive ovarian cancer. The mechanism of action is still not fully understood but many typical side effects seen with other chemotherapy drugs are less common, mild or unreported. Although this apparent favorable safety profile suggests a well-tolerated and manageable therapeutic option in the palliative care setting, trabectedin does have specific adverse side effects which can be hazardous for individual patients. The most commonly observed toxicities with trabectedin include neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, and increases in liver transaminases, anemia, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, anorexia and diarrhea. However, for most patients the appropriate use of supportive care strategies can reduce or overcome these side effects. We present a concise review of the safety data of trabectedin with the corresponding overview of the supportive care strategies.

Trabectedin in soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas are a group of rare tumors derived from mesenchymal tissue, accounting for about 1% of adult cancers. There are over 60 different histological subtypes, each with their own unique biological behavior and response to systemic therapy. The outcome for patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma is poor with few available systemic treatment options. For decades, the mainstay of management has consisted of doxorubicin with or without ifosfamide. Trabectedin is a synthetic agent derived from the Caribbean tunicate, Ecteinascidia turbinata. This drug has a number of potential mechanisms of action, including binding the DNA minor groove, interfering with DNA repair pathways and the cell cycle, as well as interacting with transcription factors. Several phase II trials have shown that trabectedin has activity in anthracycline and alkylating agent-resistant soft tissue sarcoma and suggest use in the second- and third-line setting. More recently, trabectedin has shown similar progression-free survival to doxorubicin in the first-line setting and significant activity in liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma subtypes. Trabectedin has shown a favorable toxicity profile and has been approved in over 70 countries for the treatment of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. This manuscript will review the development of trabectedin in soft tissue sarcomas.

The Danish experience with trabectedin treatment for metastatic sarcoma: Importance of hyponatremia

BACKGROUND

Trabectedin was in Europe approved for treatment of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in 2007 based on results of a phase II study with relatively few patients. The purpose of this nationwide retrospective study was to assess efficacy and safety of using trabectedin in the entire unselected cohort of patients with metastatic sarcoma and to test known, as well as new prognostic factors that may affect overall survival (OS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2008 and April 2013, 117 patients were treated with trabectedin for metastatic sarcoma in the three specialized sarcoma centers in Denmark. Known prognostic factors such as age, gender and performance status, the histopathology as well as other new factors such as response to previous chemotherapy and hyponatremia were tested.

RESULTS

Median age was 59 years. Lipo- and leiomysosarcomas (L-sarcomas) represented 43% of the cases and 18% had hyponatremia before the start of trabectedin. The median number of previous lines of chemotherapy was two (range 0-6) and the median number of chemotherapy cycles given before trabectedin was nine (range 0-85). The median number of trabectedin cycles was three (range 1-17). The median OS for the whole cohort was seven months. Poor performance status, non-L-sarcomas, and hyponatremia were statistically significant adverse prognostic factors with median survival of: 4, 5, and 2 months compared to 9, 12 and 13 months, respectively. Moreover, having achieved clinical benefit [complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD)] from previous chemotherapy was a favorable prognostic factor for response to trabectedin. In multivariate analysis hyponatremia was the only independent significant poor prognostic factor affecting OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study confirmed the previously published safety and efficacy of trabectedin in patients with metastatic sarcoma and showed hyponatremia to be a strong independent statistically significant poor prognostic factor.

Trabectedin for advanced soft tissue sarcomas: optimizing use

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma have a poor outlook with median survival in the order of 1 year. There is therefore an urgent need for novel agents to impact this disease. Trabectedin is one such novel agent that has demonstrated activity for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma and it was licensed in Europe in 2007 for patients in the second-line setting or first-line in those patients deemed unsuitable to receive cytotoxics. In order to best serve patients with novel agents, it is imperative to understand the mechanism or mechanisms of action and the best ways of assessing response in order to optimize antitumor activity. Frequently, the mechanism of action and the optimal means of assessing response will be different from those of traditional cytotoxics. Trial design should reflect these factors to ensure that active drugs are not wrongly marked as futile. This review discusses a number of factors that may influence the optimization of trabectedin use. These factors include the administration schedule, the optimal timing of trabectedin administration in the disease process, the histopathological and molecular subtypes that may be most sensitive to trabectedin, the challenge of assessing response, particularly using radiology, and, finally, the safety considerations with this agent.

Going further in the knowledge of Yondelis®; what's new in daily clinical practice?

The approval of trabectedin in Europe in 2007 for the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) was based on four Phase II trials. The extensive clinical trials program currently underway with trabectedin indicates clearly the extent to which this novel agent remains a topic of scientific and clinical interest in the treatment of advanced STS. Results of several retrospective studies examining outcomes of patients treated beyond clinical trials and under everyday practice conditions, including compassionate use programs, were disclosed in 2013. These analyses complement the knowledge about trabectedin gained from previous and ongoing clinical studies. Collectively, the results confirm the activity of trabectedin in inoperable/metastatic STS and extend current knowledge about several aspects of its profile, highlighting in particular improved outcomes when trabectedin is used in earlier lines of therapy and when treatment is maintained in the absence of disease progression. Evidence that the safety profile of trabectedin does not differ materially between elderly (≥65 years) and younger patients suggests no need to discriminate on the basis of age; elderly patients who are sufficiently fit to receive chemotherapy and considered by their physicians as unsuited to receive doxorubicin/ifosfamide can be treated with trabectedin in the same manner as younger patients.